Watching Jack's D in Toronto got me thinking about Artest
Hi guys, longtime Warrior fan here. I've been lurking here for a while and finally decided to post. Super long post warning!!
Watching Jackson come back in Toronto and playing exceptional man to man D on Bosh in the post and then TJ Ford of the penetration got me thinking about Artest, and how I think his presense on D would transform our beloved W's into title contenders.
Jackson can lock or slow down anybody playing 1-4(except for likes of Garnett and Boozer, but who can stop them anyways?) The problem is that he is the only great 1on1 defender on our team.Baron is a good defender, especially in the clutch, when his willpower takes over on both ends of the floor, but he spends so much energy on the offensive end, that it's impossible for him to play good 40-42min on defense. Often times Baron is asked to play D against the opposing team's second best player, and because of his fatigue he doesn't fare well. Biedrins, because of his mobility is a good team defender(weakside+rebounding), but his lack of strength in 1on1 D makes him below or close to average. Everybody else except for Barnes(who is a decent defender) are well below average. Which leads me to Artest who, if you watch a lot of Bball, is as good of a defender as Jackson. He can also guard strong 4s, something that Jackson can't. They(Artest and Jackson) do have a similar skillset when you think about it. Both play superb D, can post up,drive of penetration shoot a 3ball. Jackson is a better distributor, while Artest is a better rebounder.
Most of the good NBA teams have 2 players that initiate offense, the best ones(SA,Bos)3 at the most. Acquiring Artest would allow us to have 2 lock down defenders that can guard 1-4,and that will allow Baron to coast on defense, guarding the weakest of opposing 1-3 and conserve the energy for the offense. Artest is also a perennial NBA top 10 steals leader, and is quick enough to finish on an ensuing fast break. Plus if you slide Jackson to SG, and put Artest at SF, we will have the strongest, toughest and most physical 1-3 in the entire league, which would compensate for the lack of strength and toughness in the frountcourt. Baron, Jack, Artest, Al, Dre would be a much better staring 5 than a last years team, much more versatile and very Nelsonesque. This team will be able to man up any opponent, and go to the zone not out of necessity, but rather on our own terms, when we feel like it.
Also something to consider is that Artest only makes $8mil this year, and that even though he can opt out in 08-09, his market value is not very high,just like Jackson's, and he can probably be had for a $9/mil a year. This is less than a Ellis/Pietrus(a trade scenario discussed on the board before)combo will command next year.
As it stands right now I would consider giving up Ellis/Pietrus/O'Bryant for Artest+Udrih or 2nd rounder.
What do u guys think? Any comments, ideas will be appreciated
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
I'd really...
I heard Henry Abbott on the Basketball Jones podcast talk about Artest, and he mentioned that Artest is an incredibly sweet, almost "delicate" seeming guy when he's talked to him off the court, but that he seems to lack certain psychological things that people need to have in order to lead normal, happy lives. I'd be very concerned about how Artest would react to playing for us. Baron, Barnes and Jackson are all kind of crazy sometimes, but it usually reads as a positive, overexuberant kind of crazy. Artest's brand of crazy is a little darker than I'm comfortable with, especially on a team that needs to win by utilizing an "us against the world" mentality.
Also, adding another eight to nine million in payroll isn't something I want to do right after we unloaded Richardson's salary and were lucky enough to have Azubuike ready to pick up where he left off. While Artest is a great man defender, that doesn't erase the deficiencies in our team defense, and there isn't much room on our team for him to play any realistic position. I suspect if the Kings traded him to us, they'd want relatively cheap talent. What is Artest worth to us?
Won't trade Baron, obviously. Not Jackson either. Those two aren't going anywhere.
Harrington has been one of our most consistant scorers, and his conditioning and added emphasis on rebounding are really showing. His post moves have been slick. He could possibly be a piece in an Artest trade, but he's probably more worth to us than Artest.
Azubuike is cheap, young, and super talented. He's simply too good a player at too good a value to give to the Kings. Also, they already have Kevin Martin.
I'm sure the Kings would give us Artest if they got Biedrins back. But 99% of all trades involving Biedrins I would consider to be unmitigated disasters, and this scenario qualifies. I'm not entirely sure Biedrins' isn't already better for us than Artest would be.
Brandan Wright and POB? On the off chance Sacramento would take them in an Artest deal, we've lost two promising, athletic young bigs, and we're still so stacked at the 2/3 spots that Artest would be blocking players more suited to our style.
Basically, I just don't see any way in hell it happens, and I'm pretty content with that reality.
by Zack Vank on Nov 20, 2007 1:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
trading for Artest
More likely scenario: Kings find themselves at the bottom of the NBA barrel, Ron Artest is unhappy or he does something stupid or there's team chemistry issues, Ron Artest is likely to opt out after the season to either get away from the team or go after more money (or both). Ron Artest will then most likely be traded, to preserve team chemistry and to get value in return for the $9mil player that will be walking away (even after an Artest opt-out, the Kings won't have significant room under the cap to make a big free agent signing).
If Artest indeed is available, I like his contract situation if we attain him at the deadline. To get Artest it would probably take some combination of draft picks, the JRich TPE, and/or some/none of the following players: Pietrus, Barnes, POB, Monta, Buke (all expiring).
Two situations:
- With Artest, the Warriors do well and make it into the playoffs again, Artest is happy and doesn't opt out. We'd probably lose Buke and Pietrus (at the least) in the offseason, but a starting lineup of Baron/CaptJack/Artest/Harrington/Biedrins is hard to argue against.
- With Artest, the Warriors self implode and do horribly. The good thing about this is, chances are he'll opt out in the offseason if the year goes sour, and our Ron Artest experiment will only have costed us half a season, and our financial situation in the offseason remains the same as it would've been. Sure, we'll lose the chance to resign whichever players we sent over to the Kings to get Artest. But realistically speaking, along with re-signing Biedrins, we'll only be able to re-sign one (or two maybe) of those expiring contract players anyway.
by jlagace on Nov 20, 2007 2:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
BUT
A few teams off the top of my head in the East that could sure use a SF like Ron Artest: Knicks, Bucks, Sixers, and the Heat.
by jlagace on Nov 20, 2007 2:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If...
by Zack Vank on Nov 20, 2007 2:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Buke
However, it's probably unlikely the Kings would ask for Buke considering the emergence of their very own high-scoring SG, Kevin Martin.
by jlagace on Nov 20, 2007 2:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hm
- Put the "title contenders" concept out of your head. Artest makes us a better team, for all the reasons you mention; and he gives us a much better chance of wrenching the #8 seed from LA, or possibly #6 or 7 from New Orleans or Denver. That's not the same as competing with the San Antonios, Phoenixes, and Utahs of the world. We still wouldn't have a legit board-banging 4, and we still wouldn't have a Top 5-10 NBA player. We'd also likely need more than half-season to gel into said "contender." Basically we'd be lucky to make it into the second round of the playoffs ... but we'd at least stand a better chance of doing so than we do now.
- Even if Sacramento falls out of the race and wants him gone, we'll still have to make a competitive offer. The best fit in terms of contract is probably Harrington, but his departure would leave us without our #2 rebounder and our #2 scoring option. I agree with JLagace that Azubuike should be off limits, and that Sac probably wouldn't want him anyway. Obviously no way on Biedrins. Monta I would do, but again, with Martin in the fold, he's not a great fit for them. Best case would be the TPE plus a draft pick, but I'm not sure that's quite enough...
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 20, 2007 3:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
title contender
however, we would scare ourselves as well. it really really sucks because 1)i think there is a good chance we can get him b.c. of sactos rebuilding issues 2)we could be soo good with that team, and as mentioned, hes cheap! But unfortunately, he is waaay waaay too unpredictable, dangerous, and a team killer. Every where he goes he causes problems and that would not be good for this family. Only chance is if nellie can somehow rein him in and he becomes reborn as a gsw.
So, his character issues outweighs every positive he would bring to the team because hes a potential team cancer. If he could find a way to supress those flaws(ala TO) then i think the deal would be amazing.
by jrizzle on Nov 20, 2007 7:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i dunno
by gsw4life on Nov 20, 2007 11:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its Geoff Petire
read: we could get a good deal
read: thats not how u spell jeff
by jrizzle on Nov 20, 2007 7:32 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I just can't remember...
by Zack Vank on Nov 20, 2007 8:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Positive:
- Single handedly took a lottery bound team to the playoffs and gave San Antonio a run for their money the season he went to Sac
- Went on an excursion to Africa where he humbled himself
- Is definitely a to 10 player in the NBA
Because Oakland (Oakland), is just like Compton (Compton).
by dubsball on Nov 20, 2007 8:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"Top 10 player"
KG
Duncan
LeBron
Wade
Kobe
Nash
Marion
Deron
CP3
Boozer
D. Howard
Nowitzki
Yao
McGrady
That's 14. Artest doesn't crack that list, even on a good mental-health day. BD's probably closer to it than he is. That said, I'd love to have him at the right price -- basically, anyone but Baron, Biedrins, Buki, Brandan or Jack.
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 20, 2007 9:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"even on a good
zorgon will be pissed Foyle didn't make the list
"Hey, i'm a warrior fan so i'm naturally pessimistic." - Kenntoe
by Anomaly on Nov 20, 2007 12:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey!
Well, I basically agree with it. I would not include Chris Paul, Deron Williams, or Shawn Marion in that category though, that's my personal opinion. If Marion were swapped for Artest Phoenix would be even better. McGrady is also a little suspect because lately he's only strong with Yao, so I'd probably accept Yao in that list and start to trade my T-Mac cards if you know what I mean.
So in that case, I still see Artest flirting with #10-12, close enough I guess. I think you're forgetting how Indiana bombed after he and Jack left, not to mention, how hard teams were trying to get him when Sac decided to throw a hot Peja at Indy to get him. (Now Peja's in New Orleans where they lead the West, you can't credit CP alone for that). Artests stock has just been a little down because he was mentally out of it with his domestic issues, but he's a baller, with the right coach and the right teammates, (i.e. Miami or GS), he would be right back in top 10 status with no question.
BTW can you explain your username, Sleepy Freud? Just curious.
Let's beat the Knicks tonight!
Because Oakland (Oakland), is just like Compton (Compton).
by dubsball on Nov 20, 2007 1:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
As far as the handle ... first name that popped into my head, really. Sleepy Floyd was the first Warrior I liked (I kinda liked Rick Barry as a tiny tot, but I was a Celtics fan then) and I dug the Freud/Sleep connection. Plus when you live in Japan for two years, you start to hear Freud and Floyd as the same word.
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 20, 2007 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
And I see where you are coming from now with the Artest thing, still don't agree, but maybe I just liked him for naming his music company Tru Warier lol.
Hey what's your email address I want to send you something related to our discussion that you might like? Or if you do not want to post it publically email me at dubsball@gmail.com.
Because Oakland (Oakland), is just like Compton (Compton).
by dubsball on Nov 24, 2007 12:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
when he
by jrizzle on Nov 20, 2007 8:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sac is trying to build around Kmart
As far as our offer Pietrus is having a decent year, POB will give them a second center behind Hawes, if Miller is traded and Ellis is at least a temporary relieve at PG, and who knows, maybe if given enough trust and freedom, he can be a better player and PG in Sac alongside Kmart.
Now if you throw POB(2.2mil)Pietrus(3.5)Ellis(.8mil)for Artest(7.8mil)this deal goes through on Real GM. Worst case scenario we throw a pick their way, not that we don't have enoguh young and promising on our team already
by JustAnotherWarrior on Nov 20, 2007 8:42 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This isn't my forte...
Knicks get Ron Artest & Monta Ellis
W's get David lee & Nate Robinson
Kings get Knicks 1st, W's 1st 8 mil TPE
Don't know if it works CBA wise. I think no team comes out fleeced. And all teams kinda get what they want.
Input, guys?
Best duo since...
by Tim N Chris Burger on Nov 20, 2007 8:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't work
If Sac falls out of the race, I'd offer them the TPE and a lottery-protected first-rounder and see what happens. They might not do better than that.
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 20, 2007 9:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What if it went down in this order
- Artest for warriors 1st and 8 mil tpe + pick to be named
- Artest & Monta for D. Lee, N. Robinson + NZ 1st
- Nz 1st = pick to be named
Best duo since...
by Tim N Chris Burger on Nov 20, 2007 9:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ron Artest
Trade 1: Artest for TPE
Trade 2: Ellis, Perovic and Pietrus for Abdur-Rahim who has a bad contract and they don't really need because they have a lot of forwards.
I think it would work and it would mean we get a great defender to play at either SF or PF and this would make our defense much better. Also, we would get Abdur-Rahim but we could always buy him out if we didn't want him. They would get a good young player in Ellis, an average forward in Pietrus, a young center in Kosta as well as good cap relief and the TPE. I'm not totally sure if both teams would agree to it though but I would be happy if it did.
Line-Up:
PG: Baron, Hudson
SG: Azubuike, Belinelli
SF: Jackson, Barnes
PF: Artest, Harrington, Wright
C: Biedrins, O'Bryant, Mbenga
We could always get bigger by playing Jackson at the 2 and Artest at the 3.
by zaki on Nov 20, 2007 10:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I love the idea
A core of Baron, Captain Jack, and Artest would be extremely scary, for fans of both teams. True, that group will be as likely to reach the 2nd round again as its chances of a member getting suspended for a year, but I think that the respect Nellie commands gives the situation a higher chance to work.
by gsw4life on Nov 20, 2007 11:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
REPOST
Short answer for anyone who doesn't wanna read:
ITS TOO EARLY
Long answer for those who like pain:
Essentially, I see the price range of Artest (depending on how he's playing, how he's acting, and how the Kings feel):
Low
TPE + pick of some sort
High
- Ellis/Pietrus/Kosta or POB for Artest
- separate deal, TPE for Shareef Abdur Raheem
The kicker is that Udrih is playing pretty well. Its probably a stretch, but they might like Udrih enough that the thought of paying Ellis 7-9m isn't too attractive anymore. Who knows.
All of this goes back to the main point...it's too early. We don't REALLY know how the trade pieces around the league and on our roster will sort themselves out.
One question no one's put forth:
Where does Artest play?
Related question:
How does he affect our current players?
Baron and Biedrins go no where.
Artest can play anywhere 2-4 on this team.
Jackson, presumably, stays in the lineup.
That leaves either the Azubuike or Harrington to get kicked out of the starting lineup.
Azubuike and Harrington are both considerably more efficient midrange scorers than Artest and shoot better from 3P range(40% ish, superb)- an element necessary for spacing on our team.
You really, really, don't want to rely on Artest jacking up 3Ps (ask the Kings).
On the boards, Artest has probably no better (possibly slightly better, at best) than either SpecialK or Al.
Another unmentioned point: Harrington is playing extremely good defense. He's underrated at getting position in the post, switching and covering a wing player, and frustrating opposing bigs with footspeed. Artest is superior outside, but if he's asked to play the 4, your gains are minimal at best on the offensive end.
That leaves Artest in, Azubuike out. Artest and Jackson are mirror images of each other, it doesn't matter who you call the 2 or the 3, they both go around 6'8, strong, and willing to physically dominate a smaller player on both ends of the court. Defensively, the upgrade is unquestioned. Offensively, you remove one of your most reliable shooters for a guy who might, when he feels like it, kill your offense by shooting your team out of the gym. Would Nelson reign him in when he's cold, and pull him when he's pulling a Starbury?
Now, I like Ron Artest; I love his game. I would not complain if we got him.
But these are concerns that should be considered before doing any deal more than TPE + pick.
24 > 23
AIM: Jetforze
by OptionZero on Nov 20, 2007 1:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good questions...
I say Kaz for two main reasons. First his youth, in the sense that he is not expecting to start and doesn't have a history as an NBA starter. Second his contract status. If there is any way we keep this guy slightly under the radar for next offseason that is a big plus for us.
Having said all this I should add that I am not a big Artest fan. I just don't think he can be a net positive over the long run. Too unstable, too much missed time due to suspension, record promotion, too much of a drain on team chemistry yada yada... Anyway, if he can ever put it together for an extended period we would be great on this team.
As far as what we would give up, I would do the TPE+pick but anything else I'd have to think long and hard about.
.
by olympicmike on Nov 20, 2007 3:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rental?
He would might earn more on the open market since he's unrestricted; he'd certainly get a multiyear deal around that same amount of money.
So...it's quite possible he does well or moderately well, and opts out, leaving us with nothing.
Now, TPE + 1st probably isn't a big deal if Artest get you to the playoffs, but surrendering Ellis for a rental and taking on a long term contract?
You only do that if you are supremely confident Artest takes you to 2nd round and beyond...which he might. Might. Might.
24 > 23
AIM: Jetforze
by OptionZero on Nov 20, 2007 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Does anybody know
Does it ever make sense to trade one of your best players to another team that you are competing with, if I were a GM it would make no sense.
Are/were there any GM's stupid enough to do that? Or has it ever worked out for a team?
Only thing close i remember is Ben Wallace going to Chi from the D, but that was free agency.
by The Barnes Supremacy on Nov 21, 2007 12:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















