What about J-Rich for Kirilenko?
Just idle conversation, but I think this trade would make sense for both teams.
Kirilenko is having an off-year and Sloan has apparently had it with him. The Jazz have been looking for a quality big guard for some time and Jason certainly fits that bill.
The trade would work salary-cap wise, although the Warriors would be taking on the bigger salary, which is another reason that the Jazz may be interested.
AK-47 isn't the true PF that the Warriors need, but he would improve their rebounding and defense. Warriors would start Harrington and AK as two tweener forwards, with Baron and Jackson as the starting guards and Monta and Pietrus off the bench. Kirilenko's blocks and steals would be a great way for the Warriors to ignite their fastbreak.
Also, J-Rich and AK-47 are the same age almost to the day. What do you think?
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
19
comments
Comments
Might be a good deal
by Skeptic con Urquell on Feb 18, 2007 2:51 PM PST 0 recs
I vote no
1 Kidd
2 Monta
3 JRich
4 Kirilenko
5 Biedrins
Nice, huh? But, yeah, hard to imagine Utah would be that hot to deal for either AH or Pietrus. Can you imagine MP3 playing for Jerry Sloan? I guess overall I just don't see them as a very likely trading partner.
But hey Slim, on an unrelated note: is there a reason for the misspelling of "San Francisco" in your screen name?
by Sleepy Freud on Feb 18, 2007 3:33 PM PST 0 recs
First Off,
You probably know this as well as I do, but there is a much much better chance that J-Rich will be traded rather than Harrington. Mullin had been trying to land AH for most of a year - it is really unlikely he would be traded at this point. Richardson and Jaxson play the same postion, but Stephen Jax would be difficult to trade and wouldn't warrant much in return.
The Warriors frontcourt is still a work in progress and their best value to trade is Richardson. There is a reason the Warriors landed BD for only Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis. He doesn't have dynamite trade value, due to a fragile body, a big salary and the inability to get along with coaches. No, the conventional wisdom is that if the Warriors want to get value back, J-Rich is the guy to trade.
But as you said, J-Rich probably won't get maximum value back until teams are sure that he is a 100% healthy, which he hasn't been at all thus far this season. However, I think the Jazz might pull the trigger now, upon seeing the condiditon of Richardson's knee. But, most likely, Richardson will be traded this summer.
by San Francisco Slim on
Feb 18, 2007 5:31 PM PST
up
0 recs
Don't get me wrong,
by San Francisco Slim on
Feb 19, 2007 9:21 AM PST
up
0 recs
How come
by bayagrow on Feb 18, 2007 3:37 PM PST 0 recs
good point
by travisl212 on
Feb 19, 2007 10:25 PM PST
up
0 recs
i wouldnt give
by gogomaplata on Feb 18, 2007 5:15 PM PST 0 recs
Kirilenko
by BiedrinsORBust on Feb 18, 2007 9:09 PM PST 0 recs
Um, Utah's probably saying the same thing
I like the idea of looking into "buying low" on AK47 -- but I don't think we ought to "sell low" on JRich.
by Sleepy Freud on
Feb 18, 2007 10:54 PM PST
up
0 recs
kind of
by BiedrinsORBust on
Feb 19, 2007 8:19 AM PST
up
0 recs
Did I Miss Something?
Listen, a healthy J-Rich is one of the top half dozen or so shooting guards in the league, but coming into this season, AK is easily the better player.
Their PERs the last four seasons:
AK 20.71, JR 19.28
AK 24.44, JR 19.00
AK 22.79, JR 16.81
AK 21.22, JR 14.77
Last season, when Boozer was out, the Jazz were 36-27 when AK started, 5-14 when he was a sub and 3-10 when he didn't play. One problem AK-47 is having this season, the first where both Boozer and him have played at the same time, is adjusting to playing outside offensively, since Boozer is always in the block. AK's shooting has been dismal.
The big gamble with AK is whether or not injuries are effecting his slump, ecspecially considering his Baron-like contract. He has apparently been fighting off back spasms all season. But he hasn't been Baron-like fragile throughout his career. He missed 41 games two years ago with a broken wrist and a knee injury, but that's pretty much been it.
It's an interesting call. As Sleepy Freud pointed out, both players have low values at this point. But I do think that the Warriors, influenced by Nellie, are going to take this sort of gamble sooner than later to try and improve themselves.
by San Francisco Slim on
Feb 19, 2007 9:50 AM PST
up
0 recs
ewweweew

If you take a look out of your windows, you can now see Dallas, TX. Quite the site, no?
by coma on
Feb 19, 2007 4:44 PM PST
up
0 recs
Well
by San Francisco Slim on
Feb 19, 2007 6:32 PM PST
up
0 recs
AK47...
by mightymadskillz on Feb 18, 2007 9:32 PM PST 0 recs
NO NO NO NO NO
by KCBS Warrior Fan on Feb 19, 2007 10:08 AM PST 0 recs
hahahaha
by travisl212 on
Feb 19, 2007 10:29 PM PST
up
0 recs
Go for it
If you're building around Monta and Biedrins, Kirilenko would bring some permeater defense which is going to make Biedrins a more effective defender and player without raking up all the fouls. I'd say try and throw Harrington out infront.
Imagine the shot blocking capability you'd have... hell, pick up Darko in free agency, him at 5, Biedrins at 4, and Kirilenko at 3, no one would ever get a shot off on your team.
by Biedrins Will Break You on Feb 19, 2007 12:30 PM PST 0 recs
hell noooo!!!!
by ruderu22 on Feb 20, 2007 5:14 PM PST 0 recs










