Start Andris?
When we ended Dallas' 17 game win streak in March at the Oracle, we started Andris, and they "only" scored 100. I don't think we can let the Mavs score more than 100 if we really want to win. Monta's been cold, and Andris starting would allow him to warm up better defensively and stop some of those easy Howard/Ferry layups that kill us.
What do you guys thinks? Should we alter this lineup?
P.S. I know his name's Terry but I don't like him and his dirty shoves/trash talk, I think he's cheap and overrated for playing with Howard/Dirk.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No.
Probably should
by 6thMan on Apr 26, 2007 9:54 AM PDT reply actions
Yes on Biedrins
by GSIBELIEVE on Apr 26, 2007 9:56 AM PDT reply actions
Al
by illmaticwarrior on Apr 26, 2007 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions
True
by GSIBELIEVE on Apr 26, 2007 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm Torn
by dallesandro25 on Apr 26, 2007 10:00 AM PDT reply actions
I think
Start Beans in front of Al...
On the flipside, putting beans in does make the big lineup that the mavs play more effective since al will stretch the floor but at this point, we need to be able to get into the mavs heads again.
Hopefully the home crowd on friday just amps the hell out of the warriors and they go berserkf on the mavs. The dubbs feed off the homecourt like no other team in the league...
To those going on friday, we better hear you guys on TV.
You're all just trippin.
I agree here...
on the other hand, Al hasn't done jacksh*t the past two games. Whether he's jacking up 3 pt shots with people in his face or he's driving to the basket out of control or he's getting out rebounded, he's not helping much out there.
I appreciate that he does work hard on the defensive end, but I would like to see them put AB to work as it seems everytime he comes in, he's getting blocked shots, rebounds on both ends and just being a plus. He's contributed to a part of the success of the team and getting some post season PT would help him for the future.
by david240z on Apr 26, 2007 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Absolutely not
Meanwhile, an athletic 5 puts the pressure on the mavs to go small, where we undeniably have the advantage.
Beans is great but he just does not fit in this series at all.
LOL
With your reasoning, a team that has a true Center in the game won't play well in a series against the Mavs, so teams like the spurs, heat, and rockets won't have success against the Mavs.
The outcome on Friday's game will prove how effective or ineffective the small ball lineup will be against the Mavs.
by david240z on Apr 26, 2007 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Putting in Beans would be a bad idea
Before the total meltdown the Warriors were in a single digit deficit, there is no need to worry, we WERE fine. As I think we will be on friday.
RUN TMC!
the threat
by travisl212 on Apr 26, 2007 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions
and
by travisl212 on Apr 26, 2007 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions
i think so
i looked at the game logs for each player against the mavs and harrington and beans did not have any great games against the mavs anyway, so i don't think it will matter. but if you look at al's career stats vs the mavs, then he is actually ok.
so i say its definitely something to think about. it's nellie's call. nellie knows best.
by thewarriorsrule on Apr 26, 2007 3:15 PM PDT reply actions

by 
























