Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Gerald Wallace? 25% of the League is Chasing Him


Lots of teams could use a dynamic 6-7 wing player who can average 18 points on 50% shooting, collect 7 boards, 2 steals, and 2 blocks. He'll cost some team a ton of money, likely around 10+ million per year. Is he worth it? From the numbers he put up in the last 4 months of the season, I'd say yes. Chad Ford has him ranked as the 3rd best free agent out there behind Rashard Lewis and Chauncey Billups. Honestly, I think he's the top free agent available. He can do almost everything, score, rebound, and defend. Here's what Chad Ford had to say.

If you want to see graphic evidence of a guy establishing his value, go back and look at the tapes of the Bobcats' final 45 games, when Wallace averaged 21.6 points with 14 double-doubles. Wallace opted out of a contract that would have paid him $6.05 million next season, and he'd command double that if there were a more open market this summer.

Michael Jordan says he wants to keep him in Charlotte, but we'll have to wait and see how open owner Bob Johnson's wallet is going to be now that he's taken on the contract of Jason Richardson. Don't forget, the Bobcats also have to offer an extension to Emeka Okafor.

But there are a couple things I'm worried about. First, Chad Ford says he played exceptionally well for the final 45 games, the season is 82 games long. Where was he for the first half of the season? His stats last year show that he can play well across an entire season, but he also wasn't earning a large paycheck. Is the Gerald Wallace teams will play for the guy who played the first 37 games last season or the guy who played the final 45 games? It reminds me of Erick Dampier's contract year where he looked like he could become a future All-Star if he continued to improve. Everyone knew he was playing for money, but I'm not sure about Wallace. I think he'll continue to improve, he just has to become consistent game in and game out. But at just 25, he's worth a gamble for a contending team.

I'm no cap exptert, but the second red flag for me in handing him a large deal is what happens with Andris and Monta. If we use all the cap space on Wallace, these two also need to be extended or we risk losing them. To me, if we get a talent like Wallace, I don't mind losing Monta. But I'm against signing Wallace at the cost of losing Biedrins in a year. He's a valuable commodity and we'll have nobody who can play in the paint. Maybe this is all a moot point and Cohan will pony up the bucks and go over the cap for a shot at a title, but I doubt it.

So what does it take to get Gerald Wallace? I'm not sure, but there are 8 teams in pursuit and that will drive the price through the roof.

The Bobcats were one of eight teams that contacted Wallace when the NBA's free agency period began at midnight Saturday. Dallas, Orlando, Milwaukee, Detroit, Miami, Portland and Golden State all made inquiries, a person close to Wallace said Sunday.

Outside of the Warriors, if Dallas gets him, look out. They'll have two lock down defenders in Josh Howard and Gerald Wallace to really give the Spurs and Suns a run for their money. Let's just hope that if he doesn't go to the Warriors, he stays out East.

I know many on GSoM would love to have Gerald Wallace on the team, but at what cost? Were his final 45 games of the season an precursor of greater things to come or just a guy playing hard in his contract year? Let's say Wallace signs for nothing less than $10 mil per year, what do we do with our youngin' Monta and Biedrins? Cohan isn't going to pay a luxury tax, so these two might have to be shipped out. Is he worth it? I say go for it.

0 recs  |  Comment 48 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

NO!
You gotta love a guy that plays his heart out, which for many reasons renders him inactive or disabled or injured for stretches of the season.  I think our team has a big enough problem with oft-injured high priced players.

Also, I haven't seen him play much, but i heard he's a great defender.  I guess it just seems weird that we would trade Jrich for another player of the similar calibre (but different skill sets).  

by dj fuzzylogic on Jul 2, 2007 2:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

oh you haven't seen him play much?
well let me fill you in... the man is an absolute beast on both ends

by travisl212 on Jul 2, 2007 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

S&T
From what I understand, if we want Wallace (or anybody who'll demand more than the MLE) we have to get him in a sign-and-trade, presumably using our $10mil traded player exception. I want Wallace as much as anyone, but is it really plausible that Charlotte agrees to a S&T with GS, shortly after they made the deal that sent the exception to us in the first place?

Maybe so. Maybe Dream Teammates Mullin and Jordan planned it out this way: GS sends JRich to the Cats for the #8, and then sends Monta + $10 trade exception for Wallace? Hell, the Cats already axed Brevin Knight, so they're suddenly in the market for a backup PG. Another player will have to be involved, as the $10 mil exception can't be combined with another player in a trade, but maybe Monta is traded for 2nd rounder Davidson? This is all baseless theorizing, but Mullin will have to get a little creative if Wallace is the target. And it sounds like MJ wants to keep him anyway.

by ffgolden on Jul 2, 2007 2:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

just a thought
if you're right about MJ&Mully being so in sync, I'd guess MJ would've asked us to keep hands-off Wallace as part of their gentlemen's agreement

by hardcore on Jul 2, 2007 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

go for it
I say go for Wallace...hopefully at 8-9 per year. No more than 10. Jrich was 12 per right? There would be mutiny if Wallace got that. Then we could offer Minnesota Ellis, Harrington, Foyle, and a 1st rounder for Garnett. You may say that the Wolves would never take this, but there are only a few teams with the assests for a Garnett deal, and even fewer actually want him. Would they really risk losing him for nothing? Plus, Ellis is a good prospect, albeit one who I feel is expendable, Harrington is decent, relatively inexpensive, and I feel could easily be traded for a pick. Foyle looks bad, but think of it like this: the Wolves, unless they are more retarded than we thought, are not looking to be contenders again for at least a few years. Next year he would be a burden for their cap, but the year after, he would be an expiring contract, something that is a powerful chip to have. If the Wolves rejected this, there is a good chance if we dealt Ellis and Foyle together, most likely for very little in return. Would at least get rid of salary.
we will miss your j rich

by ripjrich on Jul 2, 2007 2:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i'd love to have him on the team
but it's not realistic.  he's gonna want too much $$ and that would prevent us from keeping monta and AB.  if he's gonna command jrich money - $10 mil a season, we should've just kept jrich.

i'm thinking that artest could be out there for the taking.  maybe sign and trade for MP and some scraps (cabbage, POB)?

the crowning achievement of ira newble's illustrious career

by JudBooshlur on Jul 2, 2007 2:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Sign and Trades:
The team doing the trading usually doesn't get much talent back. The FA's original team is used solely to circumvent the salary cap restrictions of his new team.

Offhand, I can't remember a sign and trade where the old team got real talent (at least at the time- wierd stuff always happens like Ben Wallace becoming a stud when he was merely a good roleplayer before
the Grant Hill trade). if anyone remembers trades where this wasn't the case, please share.

Bringing in Wallace would certainly be a better long-term move than Garnett. While he's no where the talent of KG, he'll be great longer and wouldn't be nearly the salary anchor.

For Ellis and Biedrins...Ellis would most certainly have to be traded since Cohan will not go over the luxury tax cap. I think the best plan would be to trade Ellis for a top draft pick next year (Sacramento's pick looks really juicy).

Going into the offseason, we'd then have our first rounder, the Ellis-trade first rounder, and Adonal Foyle, a $9M expiring contract (no one's picking up his team option). That should be more than enough to trade into the top 5, where talents like Derrick Rose (6'3, power PG like Baron, Memphis) and O.J. Mayo (6'5 mini-Lebron, USC) will likely go.

A couple things about Wallace:
He's about the opposite of Richardson.

Wallace doesn't have much of a jumper and doesn't get his points from the perimeter. All his scoring is moving off ball, slashing to the basket, and off putbacks and transition buckets. He doesn't have 3 point range.

While he's a spectacular weakside shotblocker and steals guy, I don't know if he's necessarily a lockdown type individual defender like Prince, Bowen, and Artest...but in Nelson-style basketball, freakshow team defenders are probably more valuable.

At 6'7, he can spot minutes at PF as well.

I haven't heard anything on his passing, but I know he also isn't a individual ball-handler that will create himself.

On the upside, he's only 24, so he has years of production ahead of him.

Regarding his second-half production...sure, he did better later in the season, but this isn't really his only season as a stud. His '05-'06 was actually better than last year by PER (21 v 19).

Unfortunately, he can't shoot FT's either.

In sum, I think he's Michael Pietrus who has figured out how to use his skills (which says alot).

by OptionZero on Jul 2, 2007 3:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade Monta later?
I also can't think of a S&T that resulted in significant talent being sent with the exception. I only thought that MJ might demand more talent in this case because of the previous trade: if he accommodates GS, he's essentially dealing Gerald Wallace and the 8th pick for Jason Richardson and a 2nd rounder, which is a grossly uneven trade in favor of the Dubs IMO. But the 'Cats are indeed disadvantaged in the scenario in that Wallace is an unrestricted FA, so I suppose they can't expect to get an even trade.

I like your plan. But could we trade Monta next season, prior to the draft? Is that even allowed, trading free agents-to-be during the offseason but prior to July 1st when they actually become free? I can't remember that ever having happened, though I suppose they could just do a S&T next summer themselves, grabbing an exception and maybe a low draft pick in return.

by ffgolden on Jul 2, 2007 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe
IIRC he'd actually be a restricted FA then next offseason? Since we couldn't afford to keep him, it would be a sign and trade. Unless he were dealt to a team under the cap, we'd have to accept, at least for one year, equal salaries back, which would result in a luxury tax hit.

I'd imagine that letting actually walk at a FA would cause alot of uproar (not to mention wasting a trade chip).

Also, trading for draft picks...it's alot easier to get a team to deal away a draft pick a year in advance, isn't it? Once prospects become more solidified and teams know more certainly where they'll pick, the price for them will probably go up.

Sacramento we know will suck next year.
Atlanta got better, but not enough.
Philadelphia won't be better anytime soon.
Miami, I expect, is gonna fall hard.

I wouldn't mind dealing Ellis to any of those teams for their 2008 first rounder, unprotected when the draft class is so PG heavy.

by OptionZero on Jul 2, 2007 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 2, 2007 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not allowed
You cannot trade a free agent.  Once the team's season ends, the contract is over, meaning that a pending free agent can't be dealt after the trade deadline.  You cannot, in essence, give another team your options to resign their own free agents, the player never having been under contract with that team.

by jae on Jul 2, 2007 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His jumpshot
is actually improving rapidly, and he is extending his range out to 3. Consider him and Travis Outlaw on about the level with their jumpshots. I follow his game fairly closely. He loves to play passing lanes, his strength allows him to burst through screens and his athleticism enables him to deflect alot of passes that usually lead to dunks on the other end. He is a great rebounder for his position, and he can play the 4 spot due to this. His upper body strength, and lateral quickness make him a lockdown defender. His explosive leaping ability and timing allow him to block alot of shots. (2.0 bpg) (2.0 spg).

Your right about his upside, he is only 24. I say a deal worth 9 mil a year would suffice.

This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 2, 2007 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly what i was thinking
in the evaluation of gerald wallace.  one thing im pretty sure of that you didn't mention is that he is fast and he has hops

by travisl212 on Jul 2, 2007 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

obviously
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 3, 2007 6:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

go for it
Go for it, mully is very crafty with salaries as weve seen, I say get him with our exception. Mully would make MJ look like a moron by getting Wallace and Wright for j-rich at the same cost.

by raypress23 on Jul 2, 2007 4:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wallace would be insane on the Warriors
But I doubt the Warriors have what it takes to outbid the Bobcats, they're some $20million under the cap right now even with the addition of JRich's contract.

I doubt the Bobcats would let their starting SF just walk away either, trading for JRich shows they want to be a competitive team now and Morrison just isn't ready to start at SF yet.  Gerald Wallace has also already stated he wouldn't mind going back to Charlotte.  The Warriors' plan may have just backfired a little because sending JRich to the Bobcats may have made them a more attractive bidder to Wallace now.

The only scenario I could see Wallace not being a Bobcat next year is if they choose to pursue Lewis instead.  Otherwise, I can't see them getting outbid for Wallace when they have the most money to spend and no other SF options out there.

by jlagace on Jul 2, 2007 4:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thinking about it
The smartest thing the Bobcats could do right now is  go sign Rashard Lewis, then sign-and-trade Gerald Wallace for a big name PF/C to start alongside Okafor.  That would result in an insanely competitive team in Leastern Conference, and they'd still have money under the luxury tax threshold to extend Okafor to a big money contract.

by jlagace on Jul 2, 2007 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In theory
I agree with you, but I think the fact that the Bobcats can outbid us is irrelevant. I dont think MJ would offer Wallace anything more than 10 mil, or something outrageous. I think it just boils down to who Wallace wants to play for, and if they offer him a good price, thats where he'll be.
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 2, 2007 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okafor
Okafor is gonna get a huge extension, and they need to decide if Raymond Felton is their PG of the future.

Walter Hermann will also need an extension, and they need an other big.

So it's not like they can throw that much money at Gerald Wallace without future ramifications. They certainly could, but it would hurt them in other ways.

Thus far they've been pretty patient and prudent with their money, the only dumb move I'd point out is using a first round draft pick on the worst forward in the league, Adam Morrison.

Additionaly, their first rounder this year, Jared Dudley, is very possibly a replacement for Wallace at the 3, at least as part of a rotation.

by OptionZero on Jul 2, 2007 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn I hope your right...
Ive been having dreams of Wallace on our team for a year now...smiling...Warrior uniform... hes smiling...flash flash...smiling......
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 2, 2007 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And that PF/C would be?
Wallace is good, quite good.  I think he's a more productive player than Richardson because he's better at defending, rebounding, and getting to the FT line and he knows his range and doesn't drift beyond it.  But who exactly is going to give up a PF/C with any value for him?  Big men are at a premium.  Few teams are willing to deal big men without flaws.

Wallace has to agree to a sign and trade and it's in his interest to block deals that will result in the team he's going to giving up large amounts of talent to get him if he's interested in winning.

by jae on Jul 2, 2007 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im Sorry But..
I just got to say that Mark Cuban is a slimey bastard. He is the Paris Hilton of the NBA. What kind of man is this? He is trying to assassinate Nelson's glory. If it werent for Don Nelson, the Mavericks would have NOTHING. Nelson saved them from the depths, and brought a winningness to their franchise, just as he resurrected us. Who acquired Nowitzki? Who drafted Josh Howard? Who developed all their young talent and was resposible for so many winning seasons? AND who seasoned and mentored a coach like Avery Johnson, who will be great for them for a long, long time?
Nelson did it.
AND THEN he had the nerve to try and sue Nelson out of some money..what a rich jerk...after Cuban had that record season, he thought it was going to be his year. We shattered his little dream. After the series, instead of congradulating Nellie and taking it on the chin like a man, he folded his arms and pouted like a child. He cried himself to sleep like a little bitch. He moaned and wailed, hanging all over Dirk's shoulder.
The fact that he is STILL not letting this go, and trying to build ammunition against a great guy like Nellie, shows how poor a character he really is. His integrity is a joke, and I hope this all comes back to haunt him and his children's children's children! He needs to go.
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 2, 2007 5:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

second option
if we can't land kg it would be nice to have wallace. i'm also worried about monta and andris tho if we sign him.

by AJC3317 on Jul 2, 2007 5:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i say we go ballz out
in getting him with out giving up baron, monta, wright, or andris.  then just tell cohan to suck it up and pay the luxury tax.  its not like we can't sign monta and biedrins, its just that we're assuming cohan won't pay the tax.  i don't think everyone knows that.

by travisl212 on Jul 2, 2007 7:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

isn't the IRS
after him? he might be needing that money.

by the evil monkey on Jul 2, 2007 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

dude is a dumbass
he needs to sell the team if he's not willing to pay for a contender.  if the dude puts out a few million and we end up being a contender hes gonna rake in more then that.  even with the irs after him i think he has enought money to take the gamble.

by travisl212 on Jul 3, 2007 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

understand where you're coming from, but
we're not talking about a few million. on knbr, they said the IRS was after him for $165 million.

and, after 14 or so years, we as fans may as well be resigned to the fact cohan's going to be the owner. it could be worse, see hawks, grizz, clips, bobcats.
besides, most owners are pretty much the same.

by the evil monkey on Jul 3, 2007 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

true...
except for that oracle guy.  wouldn't he put out the money to make a contender

by travisl212 on Jul 3, 2007 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cohan will
run for the hills when the words "luxury tax" are thrown at him...he will hide with his head buried under the sand, and he will NOT come out of the ground until he is certain that those dreaded words are gone for good.
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 3, 2007 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

YA!
COHAN! ANTE UP!

sidenote, saw Nellie at the A's game a couple weeks ago rocking a Mavs hat. very funny.

by latvianlegendflex on Jul 2, 2007 7:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

hahaha
are you serious?

by travisl212 on Jul 3, 2007 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lets do it!
If we can't swing a deal for KG that would leave us Baron and Beans, let go all out and get this guy. I have a hard time thinking of a player that would fit in our system better than Wallace.

I know that it would put us in the same financial problem we were in before trading JRich but that doesn't scare me. Don't forget we still have half the season to decide who we are going to keep. If it looks like we would rather have money to resign Monta than having wallace around I'm sure we would have no problem dumping him for a expiring contract at the trade deadline. I love Monta but I think if i had to choose I would probably take Wallace. If I'm wrong and he comes out blazing this year and proves he is worth building around (and sacrificing other talent to keep) I'm sure we could find a way to dump some salary (and talent).

The one thing I didn't mention is AB. I think keeping him is Priority #1. I wouldn't do a deal for KG or Wallace if it means putting ourselves in a position where we would lose Monta and Andris (which it could). From the looks of it Andris is the sticking point in the proposed KG deal, and if we sacrifice our chance at KG to keep him and then loose him a year later because we can't pay him that is flat out foolish. I don't follow the cap and salary figures that closely but I think that if we can find a way to get Wallace and keep AB we have to make that move. If it means losing AB for sure then I'd probably pass.

by olympicmike on Jul 2, 2007 8:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

excellent points olympicmike
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 3, 2007 6:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gerald Wallace and Stephen Jackson
One problem with Gerald Wallace is that he fills the same mold as Stephen Jackson.

That being said, if we acquire Wallace, how is our lineup going to look like?  I believe that both Wallace and Jackson are too slow to be playing SG in  a Nellieball fashion.  Also, I'm sure if either can play the PF position as well.  Sure, SJax was assigned to do it against Dirk in the playoffs, but what about against traditional post PFs?

by jlagace on Jul 3, 2007 12:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Blitz
Gerald Wallace and Stephen Jackson are not of the same mold at all. Jackson and Wallace are both tenacious on-the-ball defenders that will each give you 2spg. But thats about all they have in common. I would compare Pietrus to him much more than I would Jax. The reasons why Wallace would be a perfect fit are these:

1.Weak side shot blocking - Our team relies on help defense, constantly switching and rotating. Wallace covers alot of ground quickly and gets most of his blocks from the weak side.

  1. Help defense - He reads passing lanes like a book. With Baron and Jackson sapping offenses with their double teams, Wallace would be lethal in the passing lanes. He is also strong enough to front a PF, and athletic enough to deflect inside lobs.
  2. Defense = High Score - Wallace, Davis, Jackson. This team would cause more turnovers than any other in the league. A stick and move defense that leads to lay ups and dunks on the other end.
  3. Toughness - Wallace seemingly never gets tired. He will go all out on the boards and wear the other team down. We would not see us be outhustled on the glass anymore.
  4. Janatorial duties - He would be our clean up man. Wallace loves the dirty work, and he would bring back that Charlie Hustle style that J-Rich brought to us every night. Not to mention some highlight dunks on the FB.
Can you imagine the kind of blitzing, in your face D we would be playing with Wallace coming to the team? If Wright and Biedrins develop into the kind of shot-blockers they are capable of becoming, and with our ball hounds Davis and Jackson, could you imagine what bringing Wallace would do for us?
This is my team There are many like it But this one is mine. My team, without me is useless. Without my team, I am useless

by BlueNgoldBlood on Jul 3, 2007 6:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean
They're in the same mold physically.  I doubt they have the ability to be effective against most or all power forwards in the league.  Meaning
  1. I don't know if they can get boards over PFs
  2. I don't know if they can stop PFs in the post
It's true Gerald Wallace is a rebounding machine, but he's been doing that primarily as a 2/3 in Charlotte.

It's true that most teams only have one post offensive threat, but what happens if we go against the Jazz again?

by jlagace on Jul 3, 2007 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

rebounding
Wallace is a rebounding machine at the 2/3.  He probably won't win rebounding battles as a full time 4, but he'd grab some.  

Jackson isn't even an adequate rebounder as a 2 or a 3.  

If they're in the same mold physically, why can't Jackson rebound at any position  consistently?

by jae on Jul 4, 2007 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why can't SJax rebound like Wallace?
That's an easy answer.  Desire, instinct, and technique

by jlagace on Jul 4, 2007 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

all your points
are 100% correct

but, i would have added a number six and that is he absolutely will thrive in a running game because he is very fast and will get dunks at will in the open court.  him and josh smith would dominate on the dubs gettin out on the break and flying in their throwing it down.  

by travisl212 on Jul 3, 2007 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

gerald is raw
i woudlnt mind having him

by djchuckdeez on Jul 3, 2007 12:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Injuryprone so a real big risk
GWallace had a great season but the guy has been injuryprone his whole career. A surer thing is what is needed, like trading Harrington, BWright, Jask and Foyle, throw in a resigned Pietrus or O'bryant to TWolves, Garnett to Phoenix and Amare and Banks to Warriors

by migya on Jul 3, 2007 1:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You mean that paragon of health
Amare "microfracture" Stoudemire?

Really, get over the Stoudemire thing. He's not coming here. Why on earth would Phoenix and Minnesota involve us in that deal?

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 3, 2007 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

why not
pheonix wants kg.  minnesota wants talent such as AB, Wright, and Monta.  im not saying do it, but why couldn't it happen.

by travisl212 on Jul 3, 2007 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You bring up a good point
And I certainly wouldn't be against bringing Amare here

by jlagace on Jul 4, 2007 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Help Fire Don Nelson By Signing Petition
We_re_back__small
Terms of Service and Moderation on GSoM...
Small
Five Good Things So Far
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
The Warriors as Simpsons

Recent FanPosts

Lakers_small
Stephen Jackson - Trade Partner/Asset Analysis & Weighted Ranking
Britwarriorgswavatar_small
GSW Coaching - Who is the Boss?
Small
Don't trade Stephen Jackson
Pitofdespairguy_small
Warriors Chemistry and Leadership
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Jonny Flynn, Wayne Ellington, Corey Brewer: Summer Glimpse to Fall For-Real
Sp_baron_edited_small
Could the Warriors run the triangle offense?
Small
Would you be opposed to trading Ellis?
Australian_flag_reduced_small
Miami Interested in Stephen Jackson Trade
Small
Who is your starting 5 if you ran the team?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GSoM Motto

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae