Rumor: Warriors Interested in Morris Peterson

Not sure why he's got toilet paper on him
The Warriors are trying to make some big moves this year in free agency. In addition to pursuing Gerald Wallace and Mikki Moore, they're going after Morris Peterson.
I'd stay away from Mo Pete if he wants to start. If he's okay with being the 6th man, then I'd sign him, but only if Matt Barnes prices himself out of the Warriors' range. He could fill a valuable role as a shooter off the bench, but I have a feeling he peaked 2 seasons ago.
Should the Warriors sign Mo Pete to the MLE? Would you take him over Barnes?
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
uh
and im guessing the toilet paper might be a sling for an arm injury or something which is possibly a joke cuz it says "raptors ironman" at the bottom of it.
by llamalimbo1 on Jul 3, 2007 1:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
no
i would also rather have pietrus over mo pete b/c pietrus is more athletic and is a better defender
by thewarriorsrule on Jul 3, 2007 1:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
barnes first
by thewarriorsrule on Jul 3, 2007 1:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Barnes > Morris Peterson
by jlagace on Jul 3, 2007 1:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
barnes first
by Warriorfan25 on Jul 3, 2007 1:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ideally
On his defense, here's what Hollinger says:
If he's ok with competing for a starting spot with Monta, sounds good to me. If he demands one, I think the Jazz are his only possible destination.
by ffgolden on Jul 3, 2007 2:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
S&T w/ Sarunas
by olympicmike on Jul 3, 2007 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
id rather keep what we got
by stevenro59 on Jul 3, 2007 3:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mo Pete, Mo Problems...
Na, what the warriors need to do is bring back Barnes. That is unless they want to pick an athletic 5 that just go freed from his restricted FA status. That's right DARKO is free for the taking and I'm sure he'd thrive in Nellie's system.
by mcwalter44 on Jul 3, 2007 4:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I am so happy to see so many no's here already
by walkerp on Jul 3, 2007 4:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No way
I don't want them to squander that $10 million exception on anyone less than Gerald Wallace. And even he doesn't make me too excited.
by Jeremy Belvins on Jul 3, 2007 5:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Where
by DaAzNJRiCh on Jul 3, 2007 5:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No Mo...LOL
by Phil T28 on Jul 3, 2007 6:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mo: worst kind of free agent signing
Ignoring $$$, my order of wing players would go Wallace, Nocioni, Barnes. But I'm worried hey might all be too expensive.
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 3, 2007 6:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL

Let's Go Oakland! Gas, Brake, Dip.
by OaktownFunk on Jul 3, 2007 6:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
order
I doubt Peterson gets a starting job anywhere.
Peterson does the same things Pietrus does, but trading athleticism for veteran savvy.
None of those guys is worth the full MLE, therefore we shouldn't sign any of them. I don't want 3-4 years of them at around $6M hogging up that cap space.
One name that might be had for say, half the MLE:
James Posey. Gets no pub, and probably won't draw any interest except from Miami, so there'll be no competition.
This is actually FA season full of small forwards (in no order):
Gerald Wallace
Grant Hill
Desmond Mason
Devean George
DeMarr Johnson
Dahtay Jones
James Singleton
Jumaine Jones
Matt Carrol (better than Kapono cuz he gets to the line)
Pietrus
Posey
Barnes
Ruben Patterson
Nocioni (bulls will match any offer)
Just wait the FA season out and pick up the leftover ones, there's bound to be one that's available for about half the MLE when all's said and done.
just off the top of my head
by OptionZero on Jul 3, 2007 7:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
mason

Let's Go Oakland! Gas, Brake, Dip.
by OaktownFunk on Jul 3, 2007 11:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No Mo' Pete
by Phil T28 on Jul 6, 2007 11:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















