Mock Trades and rumors are fine for what they are, but most run afoul when they ignore basic realities of NBAeconomics.  Most players have value, but this value is mitigated if not completely overshadowed by by contracts associated with the players.

The REAL trade value of your Warriors.  Let's ignore Jax and Baron. They aren't going anywhere.  Their value here is too high relative to their value to anyone else.  

One nice thing about the trade situation the Warriors are in is that our TPE from Richardson means we can send out low dollar for high dollar, provided a player we get back is paid less than the TPE.  This makes some things much, much easier to deal with.

So here's my assessment of the pieces we'd have to work with and the limitations surrounding each one.

Azubuike:  It's hard to say what his value is.  He's young and producing average to above average for his position.  He isn't paid much (though next year he may be due for a raise up to but not exceeding the MLE) and can produce.  He's a good buy for a team rebuilding, but is a good buy to keep as well.  

Barnes and Pietrus:  for both, value as a free agent wasn't terribly high and neither's doing much on court to change this.  Both can help, at least in theory, but any team acquiring either will probably lose them at year's end.  Both will be non-Bird, unrestricted FA's at year's if traded.  Barnes is an unrestricted FA no matter what while Pietrus keeps his Bird rights if he's here, loses it elsewhere. Pietrus can also veto any trade. Their salaries are relatively modest, but could have some value as either rentals (though that seems unlikely) or as potential cap relief as expiring contracts.  It's tough to see this bringing back much though as trading partners are limited by those conditions.

The POB: similar to Barnes and Pietrus, any team trading for him would be renting him since at year's end, he'll be a non-Bird FA.  (I'm less clear about the "early-Bird" status on him, if any.)  He'd be a rental for an expiring contract, but he's a rental of a player who doesn't get into games here.  If he did show value, he'd be difficult to keep for anyone who had him.

Biedrins:  There's no indication that he's being shopped, but he has real value as a player and a team getting him gets the rights to match offers for him for another year, so he could be part of any team's long term plans.  I suspect he's a valuable commodity, as he's a valuable commodity here.  Another team would have little problem finding parts to fit in his salary.

Ellis: similar to Biedrins, fitting in his salary is easy and he's potentially part of any team's long term plan.  He's cheap for this season and a team would have the potential to keep him.  I suspect combo-guards aren't really high on most team's building plan, but he could have value.  He has value to us too, but if the Warriors are talking trade, his name will invariably come up.

Harrington:  tough to tell.  I think many have figured out that he's a power forward's body without the power forward's game, that he didn't make a bad team better in Atlanta and wasn't considered part of a long term plan in Indy either.  His contract isn't easy to deal with (though not ultra terrible either).  I suspect he goes only as part of a package with Ellis.  No one is going to give us the dynamite 4 we need for him.  No one.

Brandan Wright: an unknown.  Still loaded with 'potential' but hasn't really played much.  Part of any package potentially as his salary is still modest and he's potentially part of 'the future' here or elsewhere.  

Belinelli: similar to Wright, but as a later pick and as a wing player, probably regarded with less 'potential.'  Has done little to distinguish himself so far.  Cap filler?

Everyone else is cap fodder.