Stephen Jackson saved by undrafted rookie yet again...
Well we just extended this gunslinger and it looks like things haven't changed in Jackson's world still tossing up shots at alarming rates with very little in return.
Last night he went 5-14 from the field as well as 0-3 from 3 and turned the ball over 5 times. Yeah those are the kind of stats he throws up on a nightly basis, given on most nights he makes a 3 because he's ussually taking atleast 6. This guy is not our savior he's a builder of houses with all the bricks he puts up, he's going to shoot our team out of a lot of games and has.
Luckily last night Morrow came to play yet again and did something you'll never see Jackson do go 8 for 12 from the field and score 25 points. Jackson will never play like this in a Warriors uniform or any uniform where he's a starter, because let's be honest with ourselves, he's a roll player he was never meant to be a starter in this league and the reason for that is EFFICIENCY which he throws out the window every time he chucks up a bad shot, which is often.
Has anyone noticed that during the last two games when Jackson went to the bench our lead somehow increased, let me ask you this don't you think if a teams best player (in this case apparently our most popular player according to a host of young kids on this site) goes to the bench a lead would decrease, well it goes up when Jackson goes to the bench surprise surprise surprise... his plus/minus last night -3 did you see that pass at the end of the game we're lucky Fernandez didn't grab it and go for a dunk. Wow this guy is supposed to be our leader OUCH!
Looking to get burned on the perimeter by any player with any semblence of speed. How many times last night did you see our great "lock down defender" get burned by his man whille on defense? I saw atleast 4 to 5 plays were he got worked not by just a step but 2 or 3 ending in a dunk or layup.
I don't know about all you other Warriors fans but I'm horribly dissapointed to see this man on my team for 4 more years after this one with a contract that is pretty much untradeable unless you pay for most of it. So my question to all of you is what should the Warriors do now that they have one of the least efficient players in the league locked up for 5 years into his retirement.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
131 comments
Comments
I
don’t like his game much at all either, but you do have to admit he does bring strong intangibles to the team. I don’t like his extension. I think by the time his contract was over we would be able to find a new leader for the team and we could have used the money somewhere else.
by arsunik on Nov 19, 2008 9:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mr. Make It Rain + Jack Defense
“Money Morrow,” aka “Make It Rain,” aka “A-Money,” aka “Oakland Hills Fire,” aka " Lil’ Jack," aka “Young Jack,” aka “Deep Impact,” aka “Heat Stroke,” aka “Without a Trace,” aka “Special Victims Unit” aka ‘Law & Order," aka “CSI,” aka “the Empire Strikes Back,” aka “ER,” aka “the Wire,” aka “Shoot ’Em Up, Bang, Bang,” aka “Return of the Jedi,” aka “Hi Hater” does it again. I can’t believe people are still hatin on “Captain Jack of All Trades.” He only had 20 pts. 8 reb. 8 ast. and was 10-10 from the stripe. You’re going to point out that he committed 5 TO, right? DWade, A.I., Deron, Lebron, Nash, Durant, and Granger avg. TOs at about the same rate. I think he’s doing pretty well for a first time, learning on the job point guard. He’s our leader, our best player, our best defender, our best playmaker, everybody turns to him at the end of the shot clock, and at the end of the game. As for the FG%…….. c’mon people, be real. The question is, “Who else would you rather have handling the rock?” Not to mention we beat a Portland team at full strength with our patched up, band-aid line-up.
by SPREEE4THREEE on Nov 19, 2008 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
listun man
jax is knows bball and he knows it good, nelly wudnt pley him if he wuznt the shiz, all yall need to lay off jax he fillin up the stat sheet this year!
by HoLdEmUP on Nov 19, 2008 10:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Fillin' up that stat sheet with bricks you fool
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 11:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
didn't know
you could brick assists and rebounds.
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what rebounds?
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 6:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and 5 TOs
What was his “plus/minus?” Oh yeah, minus 3.
Hey, he was better than Marco!
by formerlythecity on Nov 19, 2008 10:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
kobe's plus/minus during the Lakers' bad years was probably not very good either
if you play a lot of minutes plus/minus is a meaningless stat
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 1:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
warriorsfiend
You suck and I hate you for trying to bring us down after a good win.
by obiandandy on Nov 19, 2008 10:20 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Don't get me wrong I love the win
I’d just have liked it alot more if I didn’t have to watch Stephen Brickson
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 11:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Well put words, Jackson can be the emotional leader of this team but please someone tell him to stop shooting threes for a month at least (or shooting from the perimeter at all)
Distribute his shots among Morrow, Maggette, C.J. and… Marco ;-)
=Gaucho=
by Gaucho! on Nov 19, 2008 12:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
pleeeeeease
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 6:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
enjoy the win then
Cause your words arent making him go away..Cmon man serenity now
by highflya on Nov 20, 2008 12:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony "MONEY" Morrow, showed up last night, glad to have him
I would like to see his defense and court vision get better but “Lights Out” Morrow is a great addition to our team
by warriorbum on Nov 19, 2008 10:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Money Morrow......
…I like that!
We're Golden!
by Krossover on Nov 19, 2008 11:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Quit complaining
Despite all the bellyaching, Stephen Jackson still scored more points than shots he took, made every single one of his FTs, dished out more assists than turnovers, and grabbed 8 rebounds. I’d say it was a pretty good day. Sure, he took some bad shots and made some bad decisions, but he only took 3 3s, which is a full 60% off his average. You can’t bemoan a guy for reducing the number of 3s he took, and he actively deferred to Morrow on at least one fast break occasion which resulted in a made 3.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 19, 2008 10:48 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Despite all the bellyaching, Stephen Jackson still scored more points than shots he took, made every single one of his FTs, dished out more assists than turnovers, and grabbed 8 rebounds.
Pretty sad when a guy almost makes a triple double and a win over a superior team and then gets dissed.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 19, 2008 11:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i actually agree with this
and i’ve been one of the staunchest in opposition of the extension, and jackson’s game in general.
enjoy the win.
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm probably one of the older fans on this site and let me tell you something " warriorsfiend"...
I totally agree with you. The thing with Jax is he’s actually a decent player IF he’s only a role player. Nellie really has no veteran with a good mouth who could provide leadership so he’s the captain by default. His point fwd role reminds me so much of Mully back then. Both try to force issues (i.e. driving in, pick n roll, bad shot selections, etc). It seems everytime they run a pick and roll or when he drives to the paint, one of 3 things happens: a) the ball gets stripped causing a loose ball, b) he dribbles off his foot or leg, or c) the pass to AB is successful.
You really can’t fault Jax completely since Nellie put him in this role, where he’s even more susceptible to TOs with the high dribble and bad shots. Ideally, he would be more valuable concentrating on his lock-down defense and improving on his rebounding while a proven PG runs the offense. BUT, let’s face it…he’s here running the show since no else can. Nonetheless, since he’s wearing a Warriors jersey, let’s continue rooting for him. But expect a lot of TOs and bad shots left and right.
No, I’m not a Jax hater…I just tell it like it is.
JR...An All-Time Warriors Favorite!
by MANUTEs BOLs on Nov 19, 2008 10:54 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
When did Chris Mullin
In his prime shoot 39 percent? If Jackson reminds you of Chris Mullin, especially their shot selection then your pretty delusional and have a bad memory of how Chris Mullin played.
by pbra17 on Nov 19, 2008 1:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry for not making it clear
but I meant driving in and doing pick n rolls, not bad shot selections. My point is, they’re not skilled enough to be handling the ball to initiate the offense. High dribble begets TOs.
JR...An All-Time Warriors Favorite!
by MANUTEs BOLs on Nov 19, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm horribly dissapointed to see this man on my team for 4 more years after this one
Maybe you should take a 6 year vacation from basketball?
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 19, 2008 11:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm a fan of the game as you can see by my name so no I'm not taking a break
I watch most of the games twice, and have been pissed off by this player for years, I can’t do much about it but complain so I’ll keep complaining until he shuts me up with his superior play, when hell freezes over!
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 11:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
damn you got high expectation
he nearly got a triple double, and you still found a way to whine about it. jackson played a good game last night, do you remember that clutch fadeaway he made. if that didnt go in we lose. so not only did jackson give us a near triple double but he also gave us a game winner…what a bad game right??
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
let me guess
it wasn’t monta’s fault he got hurt either, and the warriors never should lose, it’s the refs’ fault
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
thats not what im saying
im just making the point that jackson has been playing well while out of position, hes getting the job done, the goal is to stay at .500 til monta gets back…
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 7:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, his "position" is coming off the bench
as a “defensive specialist.”
But not running the team. And taking the most shots.
Eventually even Nelson will have to admit this.
by formerlythecity on Nov 19, 2008 10:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
your not the quickest are you
jackson is running the team and taking the most shots because monta is out. im sorry but if you dont understand this then i dont know…
by montamazing on Nov 20, 2008 1:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
actually i think you dont understand.
just because he is taking the most shots on the team doesnt mean that he should be taking them. his awful shoting %’s are proof of that. if his job as you say is to run the team then he did a bad job of it in the 4th qtr not getting the ball to morrow. instead he felt the need to take over and jack up all the those crazy shots. but at least by the end of the game he got enough shots off to get his points.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 20, 2008 8:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you do not have 4 offensive players starting, then a "defensive specialist" coming off the bench
Jackson fulfills roles that we need in the starting lineup- defense, 3’s, leadership.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 1:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"if that didnt go in we lose"...what?
you do realize we were up still at that point and it’s pretty brass to say we would lose if that shot doesn’t fall. if you want to make such and arguement then we could have been up by 15 at that point if jackson would have made just a couple of his 13 misses before that shot. it’s just ignorant to make either claim. and, a near triple-double is awesome, but as you should know the game isn’t decided on stat sheets. did you purposely forget to mention he had five turnovers, poor defensive rotations, 13 misses in 18 shots, and 0 for 3 from three-point range. now he did do some good things, but be honest when reviewing a player. he has major faults in his game that can’t be just looked past because he “nearly had a triple-double.”
by jnormous on Nov 19, 2008 7:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he shot a poor percentage
but made up for it with the tirple double
the clutch shot at the end
and he did end with more points than shots so thats not THAT bad
WHY CANT EVERYONE JUST GET OVER A BAD GAME PEOPLE HAVE BAD GAMES
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 8:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I watch most of the games twice, and have been pissed off by this player for years,
There’s your problem, watch them once and you’ll be half as pissed.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 19, 2008 2:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Come on Skeptic. your smarter than that!
by smearthebeard on Nov 19, 2008 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Come on Skeptic. your smarter than that!
Haha, I’m not the one watching re-runs to make myself pissed off.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 19, 2008 8:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
are all of you anti jackson guys
smoking cyber weed. If he isnt on our team…WE DONT WIN.
by highflya on Nov 20, 2008 12:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
who knows,
a year or two from now, jackson could be coming off the bench as a role player. why not have a guy like that coming off our bench for years to come?? i’m happy with jacks!!
by Young Moolah on Nov 19, 2008 11:10 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Coming off the bench
making 10 million a season ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 11:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ummmmm...
better than paying 15 mil for andrew bogut. there are many worse contracts in this league, stop whining
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 1:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
actually
bogut is not bad. you could do a whole lot worse than bogut with 15 mil, like almost anyone on the knicks
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
my point exactly
there are a lot of bad players making a lot of money. and no matter what you say bogut is overpaid, he doesn’t bring any dominance to the center position no matter who hes up against. he just doesn’t have the skills to dominate down low, which is what hes being paid to do
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 7:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i would argue that
he isn’t being paid to “dominate” down low. but no one is saying the bucks are smart
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
trade this fool!!!!!
and task the season to get Ricky Rubio. This dood is not our star player. He just lucky were dumb enough to give him more money. and were paying 9 million to come off the bench, He better bring some trade value to this team, because his asset isn’t worth much at all.
by warriorfan4life on Nov 19, 2008 11:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
much rather have...
brandon jennings…
by Young Moolah on Nov 19, 2008 11:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rubio is more of a true pg. and that boi could dish and throw it down too. So, I take Rubio
by warriorfan4life on Nov 19, 2008 11:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ive got a really good idea
lets give our leader away for 6ft skinny 17 year old, whose completely unproven. oh wait you already came up with this ingenius plan
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
hey a post of yours i like
good work. but this fool is trolling, don’t trip off him
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ok
Don’t blame me if keep action jackson jacking up retarded shots. Didn’t we trade J-rich for Brandan Wright, and he isn’t proven either. Rubio got skills!!!! Jackson is a damn average role player at best. He won’t be putting up 23, 6 and 4 if he on another team. He is a 15 and 4 sg with a awful fg percentage. Minds as well try something crazy to shake the team up. We all know this team is far from being a playoff team.
by warriorfan4life on Nov 20, 2008 7:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rubio got skills!!!!
Like Marco?
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 20, 2008 9:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
jackson isn't
Our star player Monta is and I bet jackson’s efficiency will go up when Monta is back cause he won’t have to create for himself as much. We paid him because he is our leader and despite getting older he seems to be putting up numbers in every category. I know he shoots a horrible percentage right now but give that time it will improve.
by FeartheBeard4 on Nov 19, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wow that's a great idea
give him a deal+extension, then offer to trade him. Why aren’t you running the franchise by now?
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 1:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
summer fan
OKAY everyone know that stephen is being asked to do ALOT of things every night
hes asked to be
+point, playmaker
+scorer
+defend the other teams best player
jackson is trying to do things hes never done before and hes not doing THAT BAD, I don’t really agree with the amount of the extension but he def deserves one for what he brings to this team.
Yeah just like you i was yelling curse words at my screen when jax made that pass, but regardless of how badly i felt about him this game he almost got a triple double.
so yeah during the season its inevitable for him to have games like this.
and on the other side we know that there will be games when hes unstoppable
give him credit for what hes done and stop being a summer fan, even kobe has shitty games
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 11:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not a summer fan I watch every god damn game kid
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
didnt mean to insult
just no one talks trash about jax during his good games, so what if he plays bad everyone once in awhile
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 11:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and although it was horrible to watch
ALMOST TRIPLE DOUBLE
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 11:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"even kobe has shitty games"
This would have been a perfect comparision if… Jack could have at least 10% of Kobe’s good games
=Gaucho=
by Gaucho! on Nov 19, 2008 12:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and you can watch every game
and be a summer fan
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 11:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's shooting 37% for the season
that means almost every game is a bad game for him shooting.
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 11:35 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
+1
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
one of the main reasons he is not efficient in his shots
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/stats/bycategory?cat=Fielding&sort=25
he basically leads the league in minutes.
hes getting older and cannot handle this kind pt day in and day out, YES HE HAD AN OFF GAME but how many clutch shots have you seen him make. how many great dishes to beans have you seen him throw. how many ugly drives have you seen he make and somehow pull out an and 1.
as our team settles in with morrow watch jackson get some good rest and get used to having people to pass to
and he will be at his highest efficiency when monta gets back, when he can mainly focus on
+lockdown D
+spreading the floor with his shot
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 11:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
that's a terrible argument
if he’s playing so many minutes and he’s tired, WHY IS HE SHOOTING?
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe because...
nobody else can create shots?
Would you rather have Biedrins do his Duncan impersonation in the low post?
How about Azubuike trying to make offense for himself Jordan style?
Sorry we don’t have Duncan or Jordan, Jackson’s the best we’ve got.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 2:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he creates missed shots
jackson is much better when he’s getting to the rim than when he’s shooting jumpers, so wouldn’t it make sense to try to get to the rim, or be in position to post a smaller player up than shooting (short) 24 footers in transition?
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 20, 2008 8:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't like him going to the rim very much
even though conventional wisdom says everybody should drive the ball- even Jason Collins.
Ideally (if our team did not suck) he would not be driving at all. From what I remember last year he was very good at jumpers when open, decent when defended, and he was a jump-shooter for the 03 Spurs.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 10:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Strawman alert
Nobody else compared Biedrins to Duncan and nobody compared Buke to Jordan. Both Biedrins and Buke are more efficient scorers than Jax. I’d rather have Biedrins operating down low, Buke shooting a spot up corner 3, or Buke driving off the kick than Jax shooting a fadeaway 22 foot 2 pointer.
As Sleepy has pointed out many, many times. Stop trying to turn others’ actual statements into statements that are easier for you to argue against.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 10:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm arguing against the statement that Jackson should stop shooting because he is inefficient
My point was- Biedrins cannot “operate” down low; he gets his points primarily from offensive rebounds and assists, occasionally a quick move to the basket. He cannot draw the defense (as a Duncan would) or create a shot for himself.
Likewise, Azubuike cannot create shots for himself as a Jordan-caliber shooting guard could. Basically, if your offense is predicated upon Azubuike playing a Jordan role, your offense will suck. Incidentally, the things you’d like Azubuike to do are based off someone ELSE doing the hard work (drawing the defense and passing). If Jackson does not establish himself as the primary threat, Azubuike won’t get his.
My point is that Azubuike and Biedrins are great players, but they are complementary players. A team of Azubuikes and Biedrinses will fail. They are efficient scorers BECAUSE of Jackson, not despite him. If you like, I can replace Duncan and Jordan with, say, Ilgauskas and Mayo, who can create their own shot.
I don’t think Jackson is the ideal creator, but he’s the best we’ve got right now.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 10:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A big man who gets his points from assists?!?!?!
Unheard of! Let’s go get Carlos Boozer, he doesn’t get his points from assists!
Azubuike cannot create shots for himself as a Jordan-caliber shooting guard could
Just stop. Nobody is a Jordan-caliber shooting guard. Unless you’re talking about the Washington Wizards Jordan.
I fail to see how Jax makes Buke & Beans more efficient. I don’t think Jax is as bad as many would like to believe, but he does take a lot of bad shots that could go elsewhere is all I’m saying. Yeah, what I want is for Jax to drive the lane and kick it to Buke, not sit there dribbling on the perimeter and pull up for a fadeaway 20 footer. And Beans is putting up 17/14 this year, what more do you want from him in terms of “operating down low”? Have you seen the video in my sig?
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I want Jax to do what he does best, not what he doesn't
He’s not a distance shooter, he should stop taking so many.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 11:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he IS a distance shooter
that was his offensive role on the championship Spurs and the Believeteam
he shot a good % last year, especially when open, often even when defended
he is a good shooter and that is his ideal role in the offense
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 12:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's a career 34% shooter from 3
In what realm does this qualify him as being a good distance shooter? He also shoots less than 42% from the field, also bad for inside the arc. Career, he scores 15 points on 12.8 shots per game, again below average. He is a below average shooter who does not shoot well from distance and Nellie lets him take 7 a night.
By the numbers, he is a below average shooter.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 1:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so in the last game
he did us a favor by only goiong 0-3 from the 3 pt line instead of 0-7. now i see how he had a great game.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 20, 2008 1:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly! Very astute judgement.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 1:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Baron Davis 33%
Kobe 34%
Lebron 32.5%
Richardson 36%
None of these guys are “below average shooters” by any standard. Even LeBron. Take Jason Kapono, or Carroll, or Raja Bell- percentages to drool over, right? Has Kapono ever had to shoot over someone in his life? There’s a market for players who can shoot while defended, who aren’t afraid to pull up in transition, who can hit at the end of the 4th.
Pop let him take 3.7 3’s a game at a 32% clip.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 1:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The NBA average is somewhere around 37%
JAE & co. can provide a better answer. Jackson shoots 34. 34<37%.
By the standard of “The average is 37%”, all of those players are below average. It’s math buddy. If you want to start looking at shooting inside the arc Kobe & LeBron tell a different story. BD & JRich? Not so much.
You think NBA teams are just leaving the 3point contest winner out on an island? Jackson can’t shoot, he has some clutch, he can defend. He should stick to what he can do and try to stay away from what he can’t.
Has Kapono ever had to shoot over someone in his life?
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kapono
only made 57 3’s last season. I remember reading something about how defenses stuck a man on Kapono all the time last season, and because he’s only a “3-point shootout” shooter (read: when open) he couldn’t showcase his talent. TNT just said that 4 Celtics made over 100 3’s a game, including House who doesn’t play a lot of minutes either.
Incidentally I don’t recall a lot of complaining about Baron’s pull-up 3’s last season. Even though there was more offensive firepower on the team, so wasting a possession with a pull-up 3 would be even worse.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 6:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There was some complaining about BD
But Baron did other things well on offense… like dish out a ton of assists and not turn the ball over that much. He and Jax were lumped together in the “Why the heck are these two awful shooters taking a combined 15 3s a night?!??!?!”
Oh Kapono, yeah, sure… he’s not the best things since sliced bread. There are plenty of other players in the league who take plenty of shots. Combined, they all average better than Jax. Maybe Jax isn’t a high percentage shooter because he takes too many shots over people. If so, he should stop doing that. Pass the ball to somebody else who can do something, anything better with the ball.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 20, 2008 8:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ok... a Jordan TYPE shooting guard
Excuse me if I don’t pick the right words on a sports site. You know what I mean… a creator. There are roles in this league. I threw out Barbosa; probably not the best comparison. If you watch college ball, try Mayo or Afflalo from recent years, Rice from BC, Cal’s Robertson and Christopher, etc etc etc. Jordan TYPE guards are much more common in the college game than the pro game.
You are right. A big man who does not get his points from assists is rare. Boozer, Duncan, Z (probably another bad comparison), Gasol. The point is, it’s HARD to find one of those (that’s why they’re all considered good). Biedrins is not one of them, so your suggestion to let him “operate down low” is ridiculous. 17/14? 17 points from putbacks, screen-and-rolls, and free throws.
Jackson tries to run the offense, and he tries to drive, neither of which he is great at. Sometimes he just HAS to put up a shot because nobody else can and he gets killed for that. Who knows what goes on on the floor? Maybe the play breaks down, there’s 9 seconds left and Jackson knows there’s no way in hell he’s going to give it to Watson or Azubuike and make them look stupid.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 12:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I keep my word (from the other post) - Trade him
while he “still” has value. (and while Morrow keeps saving us games)
=Gaucho=
by Gaucho! on Nov 19, 2008 12:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
too late, that train left the station when the extension got inked
by hardcore on Nov 19, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True. He's a W for life now.
Nobody will touch his problems for that kind of money. This is the only place he could be a factor.
by formerlythecity on Nov 19, 2008 10:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
SJax
I concur with everything regarding efficiency and ludacris shot selection. here are my perception on the positives and negatives of capt jacks game.
cons:
BAD SHOT SELECTION/low fg percentage
over rated defender
limited athletesicm
can lose control of his emotions
pros:
chasmatic leader
crazy chemistry w/beidrins
solid ft shooter
he’s a vet’s vet (which makes me ok with the contract)
learning the point in the short term but definately not a long term solution
BRINGS A SWAG everyone feeds off
Look, he has his faults but i saw him shoot 7 for 7 on threes his first year in GS contrary to your comment and realize those days come 1 out of every 20 games. in my opinion he needs to be tamed to harness his pros and limit his cons. i just dont know if its possible for don or anyone for that matter to limit those cons keep the same guys that gets to the foul line when he wants too and most importantly brings that swag. he isnt a #1 option on a team. he is suited to be a 2nd but ideally a 3rd option(on the court). as a leader he is a perfect guy for our youngins to follow and learn from(his mistakes).
by IndubitableBayAreaGM on Nov 19, 2008 12:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
mostly agree...
.. but, over rated defender? Even if true, he is still the best defender (’cept possibly Andris – apples and oranges) on this team.
His contract is fair. For the next five years he will be paid less than Maggette, less than Monta, less than Andris. He needs to settle into a 32 min role and take half the number of long shots. That should happen when Monta and possibly Morrow play more minutes. Right now his coach is asking too much of him. People shouldn’t get down on Jackson for that.
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
by fotd on Nov 19, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Look at where we were
Warriorsfiend, I do understand your points about StackJack’s low shooting percentage. However, consider this, since we have acquired Stephen Jackson, our record with Stephen in the lineup is something like 46-27 (.630). One could argue that he has played with great players and that is why the win percentage is so how; but, that same great lineup went 0-6 to start the year without him last year, and the year before that were lost without him.
Stephen Jackson’s game transcends shot attempts and percentages. He brings leadership, toughness, and an actual respect to the idea of being a Warrior. Hammer Jack and this extension all you like, but the guy has helped make it cool to be a Warriors fan again. Don’t get me wrong, I used to love rooting for Gil and J-Rich, and others who have come through the ranks; however, this guy has produced much more than any of those individuals could have imagined.
And lastly, since when has 30 years old become too old to produce. Mark Cuban argued Steve Nash was “too old” to sign at age 30, and Mr. Nash proceeded to win two MVP’s after that; Michael Jordan won three titles in his mid 30’s; John Stockton and Karl Malone achieved success well into their late 30’s. Not saying that Jack is these players, but the guy’s game is not predicated on factors that you lose with age. His game is not about speed or athleticism; his game is about heart, toughness, and knocking down jumpers. I see Jackson being able to play this role for a while longer, and I see a leader who can and will represent a successful Warriors organization. Jack’s signing represents loyalty, something this organization’s fans should know well about…and something that until now, has been left at the wayside by management (see Baron and J-Rich, which Atma covered in depth).
by str8ballinsf on Nov 19, 2008 1:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
the money
For the production we get from him, and the amount we pay, he’s definitely worth it. He puts up bad shots, but without him our team would be worse off. Blame the bad shots on Nelly if anything, since he hasn’t reeled him in when he gets like that. I wouldnt be suprised if Nelly told Jax to shoot whenever he wanted.
by q00pster on Nov 19, 2008 1:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
well said warriorsfiend
its frustrating to watch jax play most of the time. i think if he wasnt such a selfish player always trying to get his points regardless of how well he is shoting he mite be a better player.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 19, 2008 1:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jack
I understand where the negative comment is coming from. I was at the game last night, and for some reason those bad shots he throws up looked way worse in person. Don’t get me wrong, I still love the guy, and am glad that he is on our team, but he really does need to move the ball around a little more when he is triple teamed. He thinks everything is a foul and lies on the ground while the other team takes a fastbreak to the bucket. I love the intangibles that he brings to the game i.e. toughness, veteran leadership, and drive, but he really does need to learn the difference between a good shot and a bad shot. Sooner or later it will cost us an important game (probably already cost us a couple, though you could argue he won us a couple too.)
by Pearlsofwisdom on Nov 19, 2008 1:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
no matter where you saw those shots they were really bad ones
some are talking about how he saved the game by hitting that fadeaway. he was going to take that shot regardless. i think he had 1 assist in the 4th and that mite have been the last time he actually passed the ball.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 19, 2008 2:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
your overlooking
everything jack did well just to diss him, we won the game… now shut the ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff up
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 6:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think the problem is your only seeing what you want to see.
im not trying to dis your guy. he doesnt need my help he’s doing a good job on his own. sure he got his pts but how many shots did he have to take to get them? he got all those assists but how many TO’s did he have?
jax is a cool dude. he exhibits alot qualities that many people admire. i think the biggest problem with jax is wants to be the man. he wants to jordan but he’s a poor mans pippen.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 20, 2008 9:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you'll never see Jackson do go 8 for 12 from the field and score 25 points
To Stack Jack’s credit though, he did make 7 threes and finished with 31 in game 6 against Dallas in the playoffs 2 years ago.
I know i know… that was a long time ago and it’s more of like “what have you done for me lately?” I know… he takes too many shots and comes out with a low percentage. Let’s not forget he helped turned things around after the Dunmurphy trade. He’s not a superstar leader, but he’s gotten the Dubs somewhere in the past.
by spacedout on Nov 19, 2008 2:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Part of the problem I see with Jax
is that he takes the ball into traffic expecting the calls. Defenses are tuned into collapsing on him and when they do, he doesn’t get nearly the calls that he thinks he deserves. I’m a Warriors fan, so I’m biased in that I think he should be getting a few more calls, but he doesn’t. The sooner he realizes that and be a little more selective in forcing shots, the better the team will be. But he’s a vet (and plays his way) and as others have said, is learning the pg position which is notoriously difficult. It was good to see that he was looking for others (especially Morrow) last night though. Let’s hope he continues to build on that.
by yuletak on Nov 19, 2008 3:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
To his credit
Jackson in the second part of last season shot %38 from 3 point land and had a nice 2 to 1 assist to turnover ratio. He also shot 85 percent from the line. Not terribly inefficient. But I have to agree, his shot selection is woeful at times (almost all the time actually) I can only imagine how good he would be if he improved his shot selection and got to the line more. Of course, there were no other shooters besides Monta on the team; this year I’ve been really impressed with Maggette’s ability to positively change the tempo of the game by nailing simple jumpers and getting to the line. Not to mention Morrow. Hopefully, with Monta and the two other good shooters on the team Jack’s poor shot selection will be minimized a bit.
by lawrencehagman on Nov 19, 2008 3:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
First player in the history of basketball to get
taken down by a stupid fan when he almost ahd a triple double. Funny all reports praised Jackson on his complete floor game. Sure he had a bad shooting night but my god, he did everything else. Just shows how uninformed some fans are.
by smearthebeard on Nov 19, 2008 4:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
exactly what im saying
if i ever see a fan dissing jackson at oracle, i will tell them to jump on a new bandwagon. ive been a fan through the good and the bad, and this guy brought the good, pretty much single handedly. we sucked before he got here even with baron. they jumped on the bandwagon once we made the playoffs and dont know what heck they’re talking about
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 7:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't consider myself stupid
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Nov 19, 2008 4:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think matt steinmetz said it best, short and simple
“You can’t be a winning team if stephen jackson is your best player.” Pretty much sums up the whole arguement. He does alot of good things, he does a lot of bad things, but as long as he’s your best player, you’ll never be a contender team, period.
by kyzah on Nov 19, 2008 5:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
hes not our best player
monta is our best player
i think once maggs gels into our system he will be better than jax too
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 6:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hes our leader,
not our best player, dont get confused…temporarily hes been our best player due to injuries, and hes doing a damn good job.
by montamazing on Nov 19, 2008 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
name a team where the best player isnt the leader
Please do. That’s the problem I think monta will face when he gets back. I yhink Jackson BELIEVES he’s the best player on the warriors, even with monta. If you want to be the leader, you need to be the one that every can count on to put up all-star numbers, the one who takes the clutch shot at the end, the one who dominates the ball when it comes crunch time, when your team needs that shot. Argue it all you want, but Baron Davis had the resume to be leader of our team, I don’t believe for a second when Monta comes back that Jackson will go along with the, I’m your Robin monta, attitude.
by kyzah on Nov 19, 2008 7:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
why not
stephen fully trusts monta and will be glad to pass the rock when he gets back
basketball is a team sport and stephen is a playmaker and he understands the game, yes for the love of god he had a bad game, over dribbled but he’s in a situation that puts him here, and hes not doing that bad
you act like stephen will be like NO MY TEAM to monta or something
by alandoeezy on Nov 19, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why so?
I never said stephen didnt trust monta. What i said is I believe Stephen see’s himself as the leader of this team, as the best player, as Captain Jack. Right now he has to be cause he is our best player, and like i said quoted above, “You can’t be a winning team with Stephen Jackson as your best player.” He’s shooting 37.3 percent from the field and 25.6 percent from the three, and what pisses me off the most about that stat is he’s taking the most shots out of everyone WHILE he’s dominating the ball more then half the time. He doesn’t need to chuck up shots to win, if he wants to be our leader he needs to learn to play into his offense and take good shots when they are there.
Now let me just say this, I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH STEPHEN JACKSON. There’s not question he leaves his heart and soul out on that court every night and i don’t doubt for a minute that without him, the warriors would be lucky to have a single win under the belt. BUT, he can’t be the leader of this team if we ever want to be championship contenders. He can’t take the most shots, or I would even say the 2nd most shots, if we want to be championship contenders. At some point, Jackson will need to assume a back up role to Monta, Bean’s, and maybe even Maggette, (maybe not maggette). And I just dont believe he will be willing to do that. I may be wrong, but i doubt that i am.
by kyzah on Nov 19, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ummmm
if jackson thought he was the best player on the team dont you think he would seeked a contract that paid him as the best player, like more than monta and biedrins. well he didn’t he realizes he is vital to this team which he is, but he also knows hes not the best player, unlike harrington
by montamazing on Nov 20, 2008 1:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he couldnt get a contract monta and beans
he was only entitled to small raise because he was still under contract.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 20, 2008 9:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he couldnt get the max
Ya like the poster below mentioned, Jackson wasn’t allowed to get a max deal like Monta or Beans. But since you mention contracts, heres an interesting tip for you, Jackson is on record prior to his exstension as saying, I’m not seeking the max deal for my exstension." What did he get? He got the max deal for a player in his situation. Not to say he didn’t deserve it, but it flys in the face of your statement.
by kyzah on Nov 20, 2008 9:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We could be the Lakers. Derek Fisher is a leader. He’s not their best player. You can have more than one leader, but Monta is a lead by example guy, and he’s out, so we got Jack.
by belilaugh on Nov 20, 2008 10:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Additionally, how much does Fisher make?
Less than the MLE. He’s a starting PG who does some little things (make FTs, draw charges that irk the opposing teams), doesn’t often try to do things outside of his realm of responsibility, and gets compensated appropriately.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 21, 2008 6:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
radnich said the same thing
and it’s true
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 19, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Punctuation can save lives.
Member of the "Stop calling him Beans" movement
by StSaints408 on Nov 19, 2008 5:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thank you "warriorsfriend"
I’ve been arguing your points all of last year and this year. I don’t hate Steven because he does ad value to our team, but as a 1st or even 2nd option he is horrid. It’s not all his fault of course, but If he wants to be the leader of this team then he also will take the blame for his awful shot selection, unacceptable turnovers, and for the most part, lack of rebounding. It’s on his shoulders now and I hope he can correct his poor performances as the year goes on. I love is heart, leadership and desire, just not his game. And I’m definitely not going to be a fan of it four years from now. I can not believe how foolish Rowell was to extend Jack for two more years. I hear Rowell is a basketball junky and follows the game intently, but the move to sign him for two more years when he had absolutely no reason to at this point is not only stupid, but just a bad buisness decision on so many levels. But lets just leave it at that…
by jnormous on Nov 19, 2008 7:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
+1 I love is heart, leadership and desire, just not his game.
that pretty much sums it up for me.
be the change you wish to see in the world.
by Rach on Nov 20, 2008 9:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My take is, you can hate on the extension, but you can’t hate on the player after a good game. Eventually Jack will piss me off, but this year I expect him to still be pretty good.
by belilaugh on Nov 19, 2008 11:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
WOW... YOU GUYS ARE A JOKE
so your telling me you guys want jackson to score 35+ and do everything else on the team in order for you guys to be happy? you guys are like women, never going to be happy.
stack jack is the veteran player, the only guy on the team with true leadership skills.
he’s going to be solid for the rest of the year, im glad we locked him in.. obiviously i miss baron but how are you going to start a blast on stack jack when he’s the one winning these games for us.
morrow is a beast but seriously tho…. how you kids gonna say that garbage about stack.
by itzlilgx23 on Nov 20, 2008 1:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I believe they want Jack to take 5 shots a game
and the rest of our offense magically rain down from the sky Hammer of Dawn style.
Or… throw out our wonderful youth lineup of Marco, Morrow, Azubuike, Randolph, and Wright and let the young kids play! Never mind that Azubuike will go 5-23 and be the new Jackson! Never mind that our frontcourt combined weighs less than some centers! Never mind the 112-55 games! WE’RE DEVELOPING YOUNG TALENT.
by antihero on Nov 20, 2008 2:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Look at his 4th quarter production against portland
10 points in the 4th quarter
…that qualifies as clutch…(especially in a 5 point game)
He is one of our 2 (ok…now 3) players who we want shooting free throws at the end of the game…as much as some (ok…A LOT) of his play can be frustrating, he’s the heart of the team and the rallying cry…
you’re just gonna have to live w/ the bad plays he has, too…
by wizard5ive on Nov 20, 2008 12:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















