Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Nelson Must Leave

Is it just me, or is there always one quarter where we give the other team all the momentum and let them go on a 20-something run? and i mean ALWAYS. and it happens particulary in the 3rd quarter. why? because the opposing teams adjust to us. They change the way they played in the first half and make themselves better. On the other hand, we don't change anything. We stay the way we are. We always start out sloppy, no matter which lineup we put out there. This is because of Don Nelson. Don Nelson has now stabbed Mullin in the back and put in his own man at the assistant general manager position. Don Nelson has also put small lineup after small lineup against teams where we need to go big. I'm sick of this losing streak,  I'm sick of the experiments and I'm really sick of Nelson. Who agrees he needs to leave?

 

 

Poll
If The Warriors lose all their games up to their match-up against the Thunder, should Don Nelson be fired?
Yes
247 votes
No
151 votes

398 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

6 recs  |  Comment 292 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

i agree with one thing about nellie

he is stale. he does the same thing every time. we NEED a real playmaker in order to play nellie ball.

by HoLdEmUP on Nov 28, 2008 7:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

one season he’s the greatest thing in the world and when things go bad, people talk so much trash. i expected this. people here are fake and all talk. give them a chance to learn to play together. this team has not been complete all season.

by Somar on Nov 29, 2008 6:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

if you think that

then you OBVIOUSLY have not watched ANY of the games this season

by gorillas on Nov 29, 2008 6:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

We’d all be lovin’ us some Nellie ball if we still had Baron and Monta in the mix. I don’t think any coach could win with the mess of players and the lack of experience and chemistry that we’ve got right now.

I still think this team is going to come up this year. They just need some time to jell. Maybe I’m just crazy though… or wasted? Tap the 40 and twist the cap! Go Dubs!

"Hold it down for the bay rep'n Oakland" --Keak Da Sneak

by KingCobra on Dec 1, 2008 1:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nellie ball is too predictable!

you can expect all of the same things when you play against Don Nelsons teams!

1. lack of execution
2. bad shots
3. poor defense
4. maybe 1 or 2 good inbounds plays
5. high scoring if players are hot enough (this doesn’t necessarily always win games)
6. outside shots, rarely scoring inside
7. fast breaks
8. too many turnovers
9. terrible rebounding
10. if you’re the other team, you can expect a win! because teams that play against a Don Nelson team play with a different type of swag that is usually not seen by the unlikely killer(s)! there is always a new warrior killer (Mikki Moore, Andray Blatche, Luther Head, Cuttino Mobley) the list goes on and on!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 10:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

#6 Outside shots, rarely scoring inside???

What Warriors basketball games are YOU watching? Last season, I am pretty sure we were one of the highest scoring teams in the league, and also had the most points in the paint. POINTS IN THE PAINT.

by spoon671 on Dec 5, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yea...so!

just because we were one of the highest scoring teams in the league, that doesn’t mean we were doing most of the scoring inside idiot! we jacked up shots from all over the court! what games were you watching you blind moron! who scored all the points in the paint for us huh? who was our low post force?answer : Nobody!

 Our points came from three’s, quick outside shots and fast break points for the most part! yea we had some inside scoring, like any NBA team does, but we never scored inside consistently enough to consider that team one of the leagues highest scoring teams in the paint! i bet you feel pretty dumb huh?

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 7, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

anyone remember the warriors inbetween the nellie years?.

by Warriors510 on Dec 5, 2008 10:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm,

shouldnt consolidate all of the Fire Nellie, Fire Rowell, and Force Cohan to Sell petitions, into 1 super petition?

Ellis to the rim.

by warriorsscore110 on Nov 28, 2008 9:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

into 1 super petition?

and call it “the mother of all whines”?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 28, 2008 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously

Let’s fire Nellie even though he has NO PLAYER on this roster (constituted by management/ownership) that can properly run the point. It’s to bad he is putting his trust in his veteran leadership to try to win games, not just putting out his young players to merely gauge talent. Everyone is hung up on this team right now but aren’t you guys used to the Warriors letting you down yet? I guess some people are just used to the Dubs winning ever since they became fans for the first time…….. BANDWAGON.

by SinceRunTMC760 on Nov 29, 2008 10:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s fire Nellie even though he has NO PLAYER on this roster that can properly run the point.

  He should have figured that out and got one before the season? There was plenty of discussion about Felton, Hindrick, Jaric, etc. If we knew it was a problem seems like Nelson should have too?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 29, 2008 11:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nelson is not General Manager...

.. and is not in charge of personnel decisions. Yet…. haha.

by SinceRunTMC760 on Nov 29, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

is not in charge of personnel decisions.

  Nellie has enough pull to try to get whoever he wants. If they din’t play it his way He’d make life miserable for them. He wants these players cause he’s trying to prove his system can take marginal players and produce wins. Notice how he runs off any player who becomes a star ? Notice how he left dallas when they became too good to be called underdogs ? If he had a different system he’d want different players and he’d probably have won a championship some time over the years.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 29, 2008 2:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If he had

enough pull Baron wouldn’t be wearing a Clippers jersey this year. And get over the championship talk, that is still light years away. Maybe we should try to coax Hubie out of retirement, or Pat Riley. Hell, lets exhume Red Aurebachs corpse and let him run the show.

I NEVER SAW ANY OF THESE COMPLIANTS WHEN WE WERE BEATING DALLAS IN THE PLAYOFFS AND WHO WAS OUR COACH?

by SinceRunTMC760 on Nov 29, 2008 2:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I NEVER SAW ANY OF THESE COMPLIANTS WHEN WE WERE BEATING DALLAS IN THE PLAYOFFS

  Were you old enough to read then? They were there, look in the archives.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 29, 2008 2:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

well they shouldnt have been

13 miserable post-nellie years and then he comes back and ends the playoff drought and leads the greatest 1st round upset of all time and you were complaining?

by sam23 on Nov 29, 2008 3:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Some fans...

… flip out after 15 games when their best player has been on crutches for months during a slow start. And by the way, I only write and never read. My opinion is all that matters. Everyone on the planet is stupid except me.

I am so smart. S-M-R-T!

by SinceRunTMC760 on Nov 29, 2008 3:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

leads the greatest 1st round upset of all time and you were complaining?

  Yeah, we were complaining that he din’t incorporate a big man into the offense for games like the utah series. We had a good chance to win if we’d had a stopper. then we were complaining about the Jrich trade blowing up the team just when it was starting to jell and you see how that has worked out.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 29, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

what big man?

honestly, where was this legendary big that nellie could have inserted into the utah series to save the day? i’m sick of people saying “a traditional lineup would do so much better,” when the warriors do not have the right players to run a traditional lineup. you play your best team and see what happens. if you want to nitpick about losing a playoff series to a better team, be my guest, but don’t expect different results the next time.

and once again, don nelson is not our gm. he did not trade j-rich. don’t throw that into the discussion. that’s weak.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 10:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i wouldn't say Utah was the better team

With all of our momentum after beating Dallas, we should have beaten that team. the first couple of games in that series should have been ours. they were so close but we just couldn’t get over the hump. I think Foyle could have crashed the boards hard for us in that series and made up some of the missed rebounds. if we won the first couple of games, who knows what the outcome might have been! if nellie would have calmed his players down better and gave them a better gameplan after all the mayhem in Utah and lead them the way a great coach would, we just might have won that series.

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 11:54 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you might

be the first person to argue that the warriors were better than the jazz that year. you have to give me something to suggest that. saying that foyle might have helped (while wrong) is only an argument to suggest it could have been closer, the adonal foyle/ al harrington front court is not a scary one. nor is foyle/jackson or foyle/inexperienced biedrins. i’ll take boozer/okur over any of those options. d will was already good enough to not be worked on both ends by baron and the only big edge the warriors had was at the 2 with j-rich. the jazz were exactly the type of team that was designed to crush us, and they did.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 3:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i never said they were the better team

my point was that we weren’t as mismatched as you made it sound! we had an 8 man rotation for that whole last part of the season and for the playoffs because Nelly chose not to groom his bench and let them try to fit in to character with this team. Small ball worked against Dallas and it almost won us a couple of games vs. Utah (imagine if we would have won games 1 and 2). People were taking us to win that series and we probably might have if it weren’t for the heroics of Derek Fisher and the insane atmosphere that is the Utah Jazz stadium. i think the series outcome would have been different if we stole those 2 road games. the run and gun offense works but when it doesnt work, Nelson elected not to try to play big with Foyle at 5, Beans at 4, and put Harrington at 3. at least try it and see if we can get a different outcome. he plays with so many combinations but he never likes to go big, he wants us to be undersized and try to find the advantage somehow every time! he never even looked at the end of the bench for some inspired spirit that would have enjoyed his first playoff appearance and would have dove for every loose ball and went after every block! (FOYLE) when Nellie has his mind made up there is no stopping him. if some things were done differently and unlikely heroes didn’t show up to crash the party (Fisher) we could have beat Utah and you know it!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 4:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

um...

“i wouldn’t say Utah was the better team” was the heading on the post i replied to. now, that doesn’t directly say that the warriors were better, but it does imply that they weren’t worse, which is still false. that lineup that you suggested is still worse than the jazz front court, by a lot, and hamstrings us offensively. if we need to start calling foyle the potential savior of the 2006-07 season (a season that doesn’t need saving, it was a hell of an accomplishment) in order to make people think that nelson is a crappy coach, i think that’s a testiment to what a great job he did that year.

you know, i bet there are some wolves fans that are just furious that mark madsen didn’t get enough burn against the lakers when they lost in the conference finals, maybe you should whine to them about it.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 4:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

and

that 8 man rotation got us into the playoffs. more pt for worse players probably means no playoffs that year.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 4:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you're so dumb

you think you’re smart but really you don’t realize that youre an idiot! hahaha it’s pretty funny! you’re trying to put words in my mouth and trying really hard to prove against my point. it ain’t working little buddy! i never said anything about who is the better team. i thought that they matched up well against eachother, given our hunger and momentum from the Dallas series. i never said anything bad about that 8 man rotation, i loved that 8 man rotation and that team! i never said that Foyle could have been the potential savior, my point is that he could have contributed by supplying hustle, grit and defense downlow (not to mention a couple of rebounds). he’s not a savior by far! don’t try to put words in my mouth moron. you better check yourself! also, i never said the season needed saving! it was probably the best season that i got to be a part of as a warriors fan! don’t get mad because you’re too blind to see that Nellie’s a washup! he lost his passion. i used to be a big nellie supporter but i can see that the fire is gone and it’s time to move in another direction (in my opinion). if he would have looked to see what he had on the bench earlier on then he would know what to expect from each player and he would be able to use them and get some value out of them. who knows if things would have been different. i think we were destined to lose the 2nd round not because we were outmatched but because it was destiny. D Fish was the ultimate mircale for them. the whole thing with his daughter having eye cancer and him coming to play at half time was a huge boost for them. we might have had them with their backs to the wall if we woulda won that game! don’t try to put words in my mouth ever again! f*ckin internet geek!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 4:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

dear lord

-you said that because we only ran with an 8 man rotation, the end of the bench wasn’t prepared. which is true. i’m saying that was the right call.
-we actually matched up horribly with the jazz, which is why we lost. they had better rebounders by far (no matter who we put on the floor) and we didn’t have any huge advantages elsewhere. they were better.
-if you are saying that foyle could have made the difference that put the warriors past them, then yes, you are saying he could have saved the season.
- you are whining about a great year in order to make nelson look like a bad coach. if i mistook that as you not understanding how great that was, it is because most people who see a great season don’t nitpick about all the ridiculous ways in which they could have miraculously gotten farther and then use it as evidence to call for a coach’s head.

please, tell me all the ways that i just put words in your mouth and call me names like a fourth grader. i look forward to it.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 5:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

plaing adanol, biedrins harrington would have meant 2 of our 4 best players would be on bench

by Warriors510 on Dec 5, 2008 10:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it would also mean...

…that we could somehow get our best players some much needed rest and in turn they can be more effective down the stretch of games and through the end of the season. Nelson rode those players as hard as humanly possible and it was the same story the season after. He never even looked at the rest of the bench! 2-3 minutes at certain points during the game could have definitely helped our guys.

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 5, 2008 1:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hopeless

by sam23 on Nov 30, 2008 1:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i don't give him credit for ending the playoff drought

i’d rather credit the players. it was J Rich, B Davis, Captain Jack, Moped Monta, Al TMNT, Beans, MP, Matt Barnes, Buike and the rest of the guys that took it upon themselves when Nellie gave up on them. i refuse to believe it was all in Nelson’s plan to help motivate them. that’s bullshit!! he gave up on them and they took it upon themselves to make something happen! we had heart, grit, hustle and passion on that team! Nellie gave up and pretty much left them for dead. if we would have went up against another #1 seed instead of Dallas, we probably woulda got smoked! the reason why we won that series (not to say that it wasn’t one of the best experiences of my life thus far) was because Nelson knew everything about that franchise. he knew all the players weaknesses, he knew what was going on inside avery johnsons head, and plus he still had his son working for their organization! he did supply a lot of trickery and helped developed a great strategy to win the series but the players played their hearts out and i give more credit to them and the fans than to Nellie himself!! the fans were amazing! i was at every game and it was packed every game! the best sporting experience i’ve been to thus far!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 3:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he brought us back 1 time after he left

but we couldnt hang with Utah. Look how NellieBall sucks ass. We cant win championships playing small ball.

by GsWBush on Dec 2, 2008 7:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

we cant win championships with our roster. we can be entertaining with smallball.

by sam23 on Dec 3, 2008 12:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he didn't want baron

or baron would be a warrior this year.

by formerlythecity on Dec 1, 2008 1:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

just b/c he knows

doesn’t mean he could fix it if the other team’s aren’t interested in what we’re selling.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

did nellie get promoted?

i was unaware he was the gm, too. and either way, it was worth seeing if cj and demarcus could handle the point in monta’s absence. of course, they couldn’t, so it cost us a few games in a season that isn’t going anywhere. oh well. this part of the year was always going to be just waiting for monta, not battling with the power houses.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 11:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

so ridiculous. You should all be ashamed of yourselves with this blame Nellie crap.

by sam23 on Nov 29, 2008 3:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

hahaha yeah..let's fire the bandwagoners too!

I’m not speaking for the band wagoners but i’ve been a warrior fan all my life. i was used to all the upsets and let downs but just having a winning team changed everything! it gave me a team to be proud of!! something different from being the laughing stock of the league since i can remember. how could we go from the spotlight back to the shadows in the amount of time that we did? it sucks!! i thought this team had one of the brightest futures after that “we believe” season but somehow they managed to screw it all up again! who knows when we’ll be able to get out of this mess if ever! all we can do is hope

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 10:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There was a time... (and I love preaching this)

When I would go 2 Family party’s (in-laws, LOL) and get laughed at for Wearing a Warriors jersey (2002-2005 ish…) and everyone would would remind me “Its all about Kobe”… or whatever else was big at that time…

I always ignored every little thing they told me… coz those weren’t my teams t represent. After the We Believe saga of us winning, EVERYONE in my wifes fam that summer became a Dubz fan! They was sporting anything that had a “W” (even the clearance Jerseys!) last season, some of my inlaws had better seats than me at home games and sad 2 say… all they knew was Baron and Monta…

I was at one of there shindigs this past weekend wearing my city throwbacks and everyone there was back 2 there Kobe gear and what not… lol I even saw a Garnett Jersey! and folks asked me “The Warriors suck now! why are you wearing their stuff still?” (in a fobby accent) I didn’t say anything because I didn’t need to…

I knew they would jump ship! LOL!

by Tony.psd on Dec 1, 2008 1:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha!!

that sucks! props to you though man for stickin to your team and never jumpin ship! i’m the same way. i’m a die hard no matter what. through the good and the bad! every time i travel i rock all my warriors,giants and niner shit!! it gets real tough when other people keep reminding me how bad my teams are but i gotta keep reppin ya dig!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 2:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I can relate Tony. Pride and frustration go hand in hand with being a Warriors fan. But when it comes to representing in public it’s always been about pride regardless of team success.

I pray i never have to use a gun again...

...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...

...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...

...But how often does that happen??

by ssmokinjoe on Dec 4, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My sentiments....

EXACTAMUNDOOOOO!!!!!
Nelson is pushing our team NOWHERE!

by GsWBush on Nov 28, 2008 8:13 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I Cant stand Nelly!

He doesnt coach, he’s hindering rookies, he’s stuborn and just doesnt care.
He cant not see what everyone else on this board can. He cant continue to let jack not pass, Maggs hoist 3’s (or even jumpers seem out of his range with his 3 airballs tonight.) I want him gone too, even some nelly purists are starting to sway.

by THIZZ-A-LOT on Nov 28, 2008 8:18 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

HELLA TRUE!

how many rookies do you think Nelly has hindered in his entire career? who knows if some of the players that were forced to play under him could have been true talents all along? Nelson needs to stop being so free with letting his players take bad shots all the time! all he does is run different types of isolation plays. nobody moves without the ball, everyone stands around watching and waiting for something to happen! we look like stupid sitting ducks thanks to Nelly! you mix that with no defense and that’s a formula for a loss pretty much most of the time! Maggs should never shoot a 3 pointer again! stick to slashing and driving! Nelly is the focal point of this post, i want him out plain and simple!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 10:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I cant believe Im sayin this

But i agree too, its time for Nellie to be gone, he doesnt care anymore, hes paid. Hes not hungry no more(infact hes fat, hes the real BellyNelly). Im a huge Nellie supporter but I am an even bigger Mullin supporter and what Nellie is doing right now is no bueno.

by pbra17 on Nov 28, 2008 8:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Mullin over Nellie? why? the JRich signing? the Murphy signing? the Fisher signing? the Foyle signing? the Maggette signing? Add in two great trades and some up and down drafting and youve got yourself a very average GM.

by sam23 on Nov 29, 2008 3:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I dont know that Mullin is really a “problem,” just its a little ridiculous to blame Nellie and praise Mullin

by sam23 on Nov 30, 2008 1:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Average GM's

Arent able to take those bad contracts you mentioned and move them, he isnt stubborn and can admit when he has made a mistake and he moves on, thats how he was able to get rid of contracts that were supposidly unmovable. Hes the GM that took over a crappy roster and led it to its two best seasons in a decade, and is the reason Nellie is even here this time around. And I love how just a month into the season the Maggette deal is bad, lol.

by pbra17 on Nov 29, 2008 5:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He may fix his mistakes some of the time, but he keeps making them. The Maggette signing showed that.

by belilaugh on Nov 29, 2008 8:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Maggette signing really wasn’t a mistake… it wasn’t a great move, but it wasn’t a mistake either. Maggette’s a good player, roughly worth the money we’re paying him, and coming into the year, we did sort of need a small forward. Azubuike seems stretched when he plays starter’s minutes, and Randolph’s not ready. So signing Maggette made sense. Paying $50 million rather than $40 million didn’t, which is why it wasn’t a great move. Still, not a bad one.

Maggette doesn’t seem like a great fit now that we’ve extended Jack and added Crawford, but those were the mistakes, not his contract. Over time, we will come to appreciate Corey Maggette… he’ll win some games for us.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Maggette is not worth the money we are paying him, youre crazy. Jack wont be worth the money we’ll be paying him in another year or two.

by sam23 on Nov 30, 2008 12:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maggette has already lost at least two games for us. I figure he owes us two at this point. I’d be surprised if he breaks even for his Warriors career.

by sam23 on Nov 30, 2008 12:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s got nothing to do with Maggette’s talent. It’s that this franchise refuses to take a position. We won’t rebuild even though the pieces we have suggest we should be leaning heavily towards that. We won’t go all out for this season either, the non-Baron Davis signing showed that. We are taking a stance aimed at pure mediocrity. The only way to go up sometimes is to go down, and we are too scared to do that, maybe because of revenues, I don’t know. All I know is I would have been fine without Maggette, or extending Jackson. Or if you are going to do that, why not just keep Baron in the first place and not bother with Maggette?

The direction of this franchise is not up now, nor up in the future, we are content with being a fringe playoff/lottery team for a long time to come. We put more pressure on our young players to become something because if they just become average, then this team stays where it is. I would rather we just traded all of our young players and make one run at the title and then be forced to rebuild from scratch then do this half ass thing we are doing right now.where

by belilaugh on Nov 30, 2008 11:14 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the sequence of events that led to us not extending Baron and signing Maggette instead was a mess… there’s no doubt about it. (The worst part was the offer to Arenas, which he mercifully didn’t take.) I think Baron was going to slip a bit once he got paid — he’s certainly not looking great in Clipperland right now — but we’d all obviously rather have Baron for $39M over three than Maggette for $50M over five. Rowell flat-out blew that one.

Having said that, at the time of the Maggette signing, it sure seemed to me like a move that’d solidify our shot at making the playoffs. Remember, this is before Monta got hurt. In that window, after Baron left and before Monta and Biedrins signed, we had an opportunity to grab a free agent that we wouldn’t again get for a couple years. So they took the best guy left available, Corey Maggette. Maggette’s a good scorer and a decent rebounder… a bad defender, but a plus player overall. If you look at the Clippers’ plus-minus and other secondary stats over the last several years, Maggette has been a solid positive for them.

An Ellis/Jackson/Maggette/Wright/Biedrins lineup looked to me like it could snag a 6-8 seed… and the funny thing is, it still does. The two big problems have been Ellis’s injury and Nellie’s insistence on MidgetMania, which has precluded big minutes for Wright, one of our best and most useful players. Maggette has also been shooting worse than usual, which makes his addition look worse than it is… he’ll pick it up.

Losing Baron at those terms was stupid. Extending Jack was stupid. Trading for Crawford was stupid. Hell, extending Nellie is looking pretty stupid right now.

But the Maggette signing, at the time that it happened, was not stupid. It was using some brief flexibility to turn a 40-win team into a 44-win team, which is a good idea. Circumstances have made this team far worse than that, but that doesn’t mean the signing was stupid.

by onlxn on Nov 30, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I feel you on that lineup, but Wright as a starter? That’s got a very low chance of happening, though I am not sure why.

I still believe the signing was stupid, because as you said, it turned us into a 44 win team. Is that what we are trying to become now? Good mediocre instead of bad mediocre is still mediocre. The ultimate goal of an NBA team is (should be) to win a championship. I feel the Maggette signing did not help us to do that, it just made us a slight bit more interesting in the short run.

by belilaugh on Nov 30, 2008 4:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

From a financial perspective and a fan interest perspective, there’s a huge difference between making the playoffs and missing them. Getting swept in the first round as the #8 seed is much, much better for a team than missing the playoffs. It’s worth making moves that’ll get you to the dance.

Now, my numbers are just half-assed and hypothetical, but if the team saw it as I did — that we were about a 40-win team without Maggette, and a 44-win team with him — then it was the right move. 44-win teams will usually make the playoffs.

Does the addition of Maggette get us closer to a championship? Not particularly, but who, on our team, has us heading towards a championship? Biedrins is great but somewhat limited so far, Monta is very good but undersized… there’s nothing resembling a championship-caliber team here. Are we supposed to just release all these guys, go 15-67 every year and just hope our Lebron shows up? Because some teams do that, and I’d definitely rather be us than them. Lebrons usually don’t show up. Look at the Sonics — they thought they’d found their way out of the wilderness with Durant, and they were wrong. The lottery’s called the lottery for a reason.

There is value in making your team better. Adding Maggette made our team better, and it frankly didn’t hurt our flexibility all that much… with the impending Monta and Biedrins extensions, we were going to be out of the FA market for a while anyway. (The trade market’s a different story, but the Jack extension and the Crawford trade are what removed us from the trade market, not the signing of Maggette.) It wasn’t the best move the team ever made… it wasn’t even a particularly good move. But it wasn’t a bad one, either.

by onlxn on Nov 30, 2008 4:55 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

But I am not hoping for a LeBron. I think we can win with the people we have. I’ve seen your posts, and I know you do too. I wanted a season for Brandan Wright to play large minutes, and somehow Maggette is cutting into those. I wanted Azubuike to get more playing time since he played very well last year, and Maggette cut into that too. I wanted Belinelli to at least get a chance so we can see what we have with him, and he is buried in the depth chart now (though I’ll admit he was pretty far back before). I know that the only way Don Nelson will paly the young players is if he has no other options (happened earlier this season because of injuries) and you know that if Maggette is on the team, he is taking all the crunch time minutes from players who could use that experience.

Remember, the Maggette signing was made before Ellis’ injury, so I assumed the lineup would be Ellis, Jackson<→Azubuike (and eventually would be Azubuike at the 2, Randolph at the 3), Wright, Biedrins. I am fine with that lineup taking lumps for a year because I feel we will be much better off in the seasons following. Maggette to me represented a giant step back in their development, and nothing that has happened early this season has disproven that to me. He might have gotten us to 44 wins, but like I said, sometimes the only way to go up is to go down. I mean this by getting a higher draft pick and by accelerating the development of our young players and seeing what we have on the bench. As long as Nellie has alternate options to play, that ain’t gonna happen (well, the lottery might, as it turns out the young players might just be better already).

by belilaugh on Dec 3, 2008 9:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I totally get what you’re saying. I would’ve been very happy to watch Monta/Jack/‘Buike/Wright/Biedrins for a year, and I agree that that might’ve been the better long-term move.

On the other hand, I’m starting to wonder about Azubuike’s ceiling. His offense has been very consistently solid, but never better than that, and he doesn’t seem to be making much defensive progress. We tend to do worse when he’s in. His Roland Rating (an advanced version of plus-minus) is the worst of anybody’s in the rotation last year; only Barnes and Pietrus were worse last year (worth noting, by the way, for the folks who think we’re suffering for their absence); and Azubuike had a SHOCKINGLY bad Roland Rating in ‘06/’07. I’ll admit — that doesn’t sound right to me. I love Azubuike, and I don’t get the impression that we do worse when he plays. But the numbers say we do. These are not infallible numbers, but they’re generally pretty telling.

I’m not convinced that ’Buike will ever be a starter-level player in this league, and I have no idea what Randolph will be… he might be a bust, he might be a power forward. With the Monta experiment already planned, I do think small forward was our biggest hole coming into the year. We filled that hole with a good player in Maggette.

Now, the smarter move may have been to leave that hole in the lineup for a year, let the kids take their lumps and keep ourselves in the 2010 free agent hunt. There’s a good argument for going that way. But I can’t blame management for filling a hole with a good player.

by onlxn on Dec 3, 2008 9:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

…“the worst of anybody’s in the rotation this year”, I meant to say.

by onlxn on Dec 3, 2008 9:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I definitely get what you are saying. You’ve made me feel better about the Maggette move no doubt. And I am starting to see that Buike looks to be his best when he is not expected to be a major contributor. When Baron, Monta, and Jack were handling the load Buike was a deadly weapon off the bench. He definitely isn’t a first, second, or third option, but if he has others to take the load off of him he quietly goes about his business and makes some huge plays. He looks his best off the bench, maybe like a James Posey, but should not be starting. Still though, I can’t tell definitively yet what he projects to be, and I feel like a “gamer” like Buike is definitely an asset.

You’re my favorite poster and I will admit I got soundly defeated by your logic on this one. If I could go back in time I would not have signed Maggette but most likely Nelson would have just found another way to avoid playing the young guys. Keep doing your thing.

by belilaugh on Dec 3, 2008 10:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha, I appreciate it. I think we’re basically in agreement, though — the signing was no better than a mixed bag at the time, and it’s a contract we’d probably love to get rid of now. I just think the Jack extension and the Crawford trade were so much worse that I have trouble getting too worked up about Maggette. He seems to be getting more comfortable, too… I doubt many of us will ever love him, but a couple 30-point games in Warrior wins will make people feel a little better about his presence.

by onlxn on Dec 3, 2008 11:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

mullin made mistakes but...

he made up for them. he traded away the murphleavy sisters for Jack and TMNT, signed B. Davis for claxton and dale davis! haha! did his job in re-signing Monta good move if it wasn’t for Monta being an idiot, re-signed Biedrins. i dont think he was a big reason of signing Maggette, he wanted Baron but had to make a move when we lost him. i still think if we find the right way to utilize Maggette and his strengths, that he could help us a whole lot. Nelson needs to have him come off screens or just have better iso plays ran for him but Nelson is an idiot with a weird imagination of how to try to win ball games.

Mullin has a lot of work to do but i think he has good credibility around the league and when dealing with the warriors, people wouldn’t mind talking business/trades with him as opposed to fat, disgruntled Nellie!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 10:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

unfortunately

I don’t think he’s going anywhere considering Rowell gave him his 2 year contract extension before we were into the new season 2 friggin months.

by centerre on Nov 28, 2008 8:40 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Nelson should not get fired

But must accept the fact that this team is really streaky in shooting has no true playmakers other than Monte. This team HAS to play better defense with better defensive rebounds and use an actual system in the half court offense. All 5 must crash the boards. Crawford is not our savior. Really should have gotten G. Wallce – screw the contract issues.

by terryteagle on Nov 28, 2008 8:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on all point (especially Wallace — I thought I was the only person who was outraged that we opted for Crawford over Wallace). Nellie’s done a very bad job so far. But like you (I think), I think the cure for it is better coaching from Nellie, not a new coach.

by onlxn on Nov 28, 2008 10:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the cure (as it has always been in the NBA) is better players

if they can’t win with this style (which always makes you look better than you are and adds about 5 to 10 wins in the regular season), then it’s even more obvious how bad they are.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 8:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wallace vs. Crawford...

I don’t know if I’d use the word outraged but if we really did pass up Wallace and instead went for Crawford (which if you believe the reporting that has been done, we did) I would be extremely disappointed. I said so at the time and I still agree with you on that one.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Nov 29, 2008 2:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

i doubt that we would have “chosen” crawford over wallace. i’m thinking the deal was just not there.

"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball

by flipgatey3 on Nov 29, 2008 2:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was with you guys the whole time on that one too, though I’m not unhappy with Crawford. I think thats pretty decent return for a disgruntled Al. Wallace wouldve been amazing value.

by sam23 on Nov 29, 2008 3:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t at all like how Nellie’s coached the team so far this year. He’s done a downright crappy job.

Having said that, this is no time to fire him. We’re in the middle of the toughest road trip we’ll have all year, we’re incorporating a new starter (or trying to, God help us), and we still haven’t seen Monta. We’re not likely to find a better coach than Nellie in midseason, no matter how irritating his quirks are. And the front office isn’t about to throw eight figures in the garbage because of a bad month, nor should they.

In the last two games, Nellie has stepped back a bit from the small-ball insanity of last week. Brandan Wright’s minutes are trending back upward, albeit not as quickly as they should… Jack’s minutes seem like they’re trending down with the arrival of Crawford, with the exception of the Boston game, where I think we were all happy to see Jack on the floor.

Nellie has gotten in the way of this team, but he’s not the only problem, by any means. Nobody’s hitting from outside, even when they’re open, and most importantly, we still don’t have anyone who can play the point effectively. Now, it’s Nellie’s bad if he thought Crawford would really help in that area, but I can’t blame Nellie’s coaching for the fact that Crawford has sucked as a distributor.

We need to play better. If history’s any indication, we will, if only because Maggette and Crawford are better players than they’ve shown so far. We will play better still if Nellie commits to Brandan Wright and puts the brakes on Jack a little. But firing him now wouldn’t make things better all of a sudden. It’d throw everything into chaos, and we still wouldn’t have Monta.

The Monta-less version of this team is simply not very good. Nellie’s gotten less out of them than he could, yeah, but I’d rather stick with him and see what he does when we get our second-best player back.

by onlxn on Nov 28, 2008 9:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

i wouldn't say he's sucked as a distributor at all

he’s averaged 6.4 assists since he’s come over. he just hasn’t been able to shoot the rock at all

"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball

by flipgatey3 on Nov 29, 2008 2:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i agree with everything except

i think it’s kind of unfair at this point to place any blame on Crawford. he is brad spanking new! the only thing you can get mad at is his shooting percentage really. he’s been shelling out like 7 dimes per game. for a natural scorer that’s pretty good. you can also see that he wants to try to move the ball as much as he can but when people aren’t taking advantage, he feels like he’s forced to try to make something happen. i also don’t agree with you with not firing Don Nelson! he’s like a cancer to this team! i haven’t seen any real progress from Randolph/ Wright/ Bellinelli/ Williams/ and that’s because Nelson is stubborn and hates playing his rookies and teaching his rookies because he doesn’t have patience! he has weird ways of trying to motivate them, like starting them and then yanking them out the game after like 6 minutes and we never see them again. how is that good for any players morale? i think it’s better if we just cut him out completely and even though we’re like 15 games into the season, we trry to start fresh. in the long run, it’s better for our team because what we have on display now , is just not going to work with Nellie having all the control. he wants to win now and we’re simply not good enough to win now with just the veterans we have on this squad. he’s gotta go far far away from warrior land!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 10:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Post But...

You can never wait for one player. Nellie must change the STYLE of play to be consistent with his talent. We have length (Wright/Randolph/Beans) and perimeter defenders (Kaz/Jackson) so we need to focus on rebounding and running when the ball is secured. In the half court, a system needs to be run, not just pick and roll or sporadic offense. The team needs more motion on offense. Nellie will figure this out and not just think a personnel move (Crawford) will change their fortune.

by terryteagle on Nov 28, 2008 9:20 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Motion on offense is a huge thing. And both Biedrins and Wright really help to create, which is one of the reasons I don’t think having them share time on the court would be a problem. Guys need to start moving around and make things happen. The isolation thing was already problematic when Baron was doing it; it’s downright insane now that we have worse players doing it.

by onlxn on Nov 28, 2008 10:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of people keep saying were playing tough teams, we dont have Monta, and thats why were loosing...

Okay agreed, but its not THAT were loosing that drives me to loath nelly, its HOW were loosing. He’s not coaching our guys in correcting their mistakes, if anything he just benches them. His rotations are beyond dumb and incomprehensible. His insistance on small ball is telling of his stuborness, he refuses to play tall ball (normal ball?) for an entire game. They get us the lead then, WHAM, small ball hits the court and we slowly watch the lead slip away one offensive rebound at a time. And still, no return of the lineup that got us the lead. so its not That were loosing, its How…

by THIZZ-A-LOT on Nov 28, 2008 9:23 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

despite all the spelling and punctuation errors

i am still going to rec your post, because you made a bunch of good points.

"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball

by flipgatey3 on Nov 29, 2008 2:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

YUP!!

by the way man you spelled LOSING wrong. it’s all good though because i agree with you. i hate his rotations! i would have never thought in a million years to put Maggette at the 4. it worked against Aldridge but not against gooden and the bulls. yet he insists that small ball is the way to go for this team. i wanna see a front line of Biedrins and Turiaf with Maggs at the 3 jack at 2 crawford at 1. then i wanna see Wright rotated in to spell Biedrins while moving Turiaf to the 5. i wanna see Randolph have time at the 4 and the 3 spot. i want Buike to give Jackson some minutes on the bench while also getting some time from Morrow, Bellinelli and Crawford. Watson should be the main back up at point because of his consistent play and Marcus Williams can even take some minutes. and when Monta returns we can spread the minutes out even more. but nelson refuses to play a normal brand of basketball and insists that we play a more unorthodox style which in turn has hurt us bad!! he’s gotta go!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he doesn't need to leave

i understand where all you guys are coming from, and i also am tired of the disappointing losses and heartaches, but to fully blame nellie for our horrible performances is unfair. yes i know he deserves some or maybe even half of the blame, but you can’t put it all on his shoulders.

if you wanna start blaming people, then you should blame our selfish ass ball-hogs first (Stack Jack, Maggs, and even Crawford). i feel that they are the root of our problems to our horrible play. you would really expect that having these 3 players on the same team would be pure offensive dominance, but when you watch them play, it’s just a nightmare! each one of them tries to be our team’s best player, and they try to prove that by throwing up brick after brick after brick. we’re not going to get anywhere with the mentality that these 3 “veterans” have! look at tonight’s stats: jackson 2 for 11 shooting, -18; maggette 3 for 11, -26; crawford 6-14, -5. there is no type of chemistry, very little ball movement, and poor leadership from these 3 players.

then we can blame our hard-headed coach who allows our 3 best players to continue throwing up those unnecessary 3’s and those horrible contested shots. i don’t know why he allows this to happen?! if he is serious about winning games, he needs to have the best 5 players on the floor that are willing to work together rather than having the best 5 players who all constantly want the ball. i don’t understand why he wants to continue to play nellieball when nellieball only works when there is a real floor general on the court. maybe instead of focusing on nellieball, he should actually focus on defense for a change.

and since we’re pointing fingers, you might as well blame monta for his stupid and childish actions. him getting injured by a moped in the off-season is a big part of our team’s failure this year. because of him, we gotta sit here and think “what if we had monta playing in the game? i wonder if we would have won?”

something obviously needs to change, but i don’t think firing nellie will be the right answer.

by LETS GO WARRIORS on Nov 28, 2008 9:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

+1, now that's what I'm talking about.

Basketball is a team game, the Warriors aren’t playin’ team ball.

by DuikeBuike on Nov 28, 2008 9:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 If someone doesn't want to play team bball he should

just take him out no matter what his name is.

by buky on Nov 29, 2008 4:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nellie

Nellie doesn’t believe in team ball. He makes decisions based on individual mis-matches (as he sees them). So, Nellie wants to exploit mismatches offensively, and play team defense w/ undersized guys. Recipe for Losing and… A Terrible philosophy.

by Colorado Fan on Nov 29, 2008 6:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i doubt it, he ran the 1-4 motion offense in Milwaukee (what they run in Utah)

we just got a bunch of iso players (Maggs, Crawford, Jack, even Kelenna). they’ve been iso players for all their years in the NBA, coach be damned… what makes you think they’ll change now? judging by the looks of some of the plays, it actually looks like we’re running some form of the motion offense in the halfcourt.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 8:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

that's who they are, you got Mullin acting like Isiah or Dumbleavy Sr getting the same exact player over and over again

Nellie’s the idiot who doesn’t play Turiaf enough (imo) and plays Jack/Maggs together too much (imo) and doesn’t seem to realize (maybe he does, i don’t know) that small ball only works against the opposing team’s small ball if your smalls are better than their smalls.

probably needs to change both systems next season (just can’t be done in season).

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 8:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

unlike

the 13 years sandwiched between Nellie where we a picture of unselfishness and quality on the court……

by sam23 on Nov 29, 2008 3:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on all points.

Also, we probably all should try to be a little more patient with Crawford… this was only his third game in a new, foreign system. Nobody’s more down on that trade than me, but I imagine his crappiness so far is due more to confusion than to selfishness.

by onlxn on Nov 28, 2008 10:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

totally agree

JAX has to step up and stop this 1 on 5 basketball, pass the ball and take good open shots, set some screens,PLAY DEFENSE and work together as a team. Nellie should send a message, bench them, go big and start CJ, Morrow, Wright, Turiaf and Biedrins. No ball hogs are allowed to play!

by shootda3 on Nov 29, 2008 12:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe, maybe not

I belive in people who stand for something not opurtunists

by buky on Nov 29, 2008 10:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

*opportunists

"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball

by flipgatey3 on Nov 29, 2008 2:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

what is that even supposed to mean in this context?

nelson doesn’t stand for anything because he won’t pull jack? or that he’s an opportunist because he creates mismatches? sorry, but i’d rather see a team with lackluster talent try to exploit the mismatches they have than assume that they can win by running out a traditional lineup and getting crushed.

let’s be honest people, the ship is sinking this season. no new coach is going to save it. the team isn’t very good.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 10:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

assuming you understood X's & O's, you'd probably make a good college coach

though there it’s more about recruiting. anyway, you know what the deal is with college coaches in the NBA. players tune them out fast.

besides if you made the current W’s players pass the ball at least 4x during each offensive set, you’d likely see close to 30 turnovers a game. hell, we struggle making inbound passes.

i’m sure Nellie’s subtly trying to convey the message.

“Coach came in and said the youngsters are looking at us and not doing it, so I guess it’s us. I thought I was leading the team in assists, wasn’t I, so I know it ain’t me.”

“We go through the game plans before the game and shootaround, and to come out in the game and not to remember anything, what were we doing at shootaround?” Jackson said. “We’re always prepared to play. It’s just about us bringing the game plan to the game. And we haven’t done that.”

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/28/SP3I14DTE7.DTL

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 11:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

'believe

I pray i never have to use a gun again...

...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...

...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...

...But how often does that happen??

by ssmokinjoe on Nov 30, 2008 5:18 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe if

maybe if Nelson would stress that to them and stop choosing to run isolation plays where everyone just stands around while one of the three players that you mentioned tries to create. he doesn’t even use the pick and roll no more. why can’t he set some plays up where we get people free using screens away from the ball? we have capable shooters! the answer to the question that i just posed is—-BECAUSE HE’S DON NELSON!! he’ll never change. he’s stuck in his stubborn ways and is probably the most predictable coach in the league! he’s to blame and no one else! the reason why Jack,Maggs,and Crawford are taking all these shots is because the entire league figured out how to defend us. they know we can’t hurt them on most nights from behind the arc. they know all we do is hope to win by getting the most fast break points. and they know that all we have in our arsenal are nothing but ISO PLAYS!! (thank you Nellie). Nellie doesn’t care. he’s realized that he won’t have a championship title as a coach although he will be the winningest coach in the league! he’s probably accepted it and doesn’t care how bad our team is because he can just experiment all he wants and he is in a position to make all of the power moves. he gets the last laugh!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 2:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

its not nellies fault

although i think it sucks that we see a different starting line up every night, which means players cant really get used to playing together. but thats nellie. he is a great coach, really knows how to get the best out of players, but at the end of the day its the players that have to execute and win the game. i think that pretty soon, the warriors really have to look at who they want to keep around for the long run and who they dont.

by hoopscorer23 on Nov 28, 2008 10:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Nellie is not a great coach

he’s the opposite of that! he’s like a mad scientist always trying to mix and match to create whacky formulas on the court! he does not know how to get the best out of players! if anything he makes the players feel like shit! i don’t know how many rookies careers he’s killed in his entire coaching career but the number is a lot. how is starting a random ass player that hasn’t played in most of the games this season and then pulling him out for the rest of the game, getting the best out of that particular player? it kills their morale and some players are just not strong enough mentally to deal with it. he doesn’t teach, he demands players to either be something thay are not or produce at the snap of his fingers or he will bench that ass!! aside from all that..just look at Nellie,…he’s fat, he can’t even put on a decent outfit for the games, dude can’t even comb his hair, fool always looks like he’s drunk and tired. how is anyone supposed to take this guy seriously? he should just retire and stay retired! he lost all of his passion and that’s why the Warriors will never get to the next level!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 2:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ugh

it takes a great coach to win more games than all but one person in the history of basketball. you could argue that he’s slipped, but saying that he is dressed poorly and benched belinelli is not the best way to go about that either. and please, if you could, name one CAREER he has ruined. if you say marco or POB, we can stop taking you seriously right now. if you want to give me a real example of a guy who failed as an nba player because don nelson was his coach and not because he was a crappy player, go for it.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 3:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If..

Nellie gets fired, fire Rowell also, and sign Eddie Jordan? Mullin for President.

by AlbinoWhale on Nov 28, 2008 10:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

What scares me the most

Is the return of Monta. I love Monta Ellis but when i look at this team, the most glaringly obvious need the warriors have is a playmaker, and Monta has never shown thus far that he is a playmaker. Monta is essentially our best and most consistant isolation player, and im not as confident as everyone else is that Monta will be the answer to the warriors problems, and thats all ASSUMING monta comes back 100% from his ankle injury.

by kyzah on Nov 28, 2008 10:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Dude - can we cool it with the personnel changes/coaching changes

These guys for the most part are here to stay. Nellie knows how to win but right now he needs to not be so hardheaded and instead looks at his talent and coach accordingly.

by terryteagle on Nov 28, 2008 11:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

he hasnt ever gotten to his conference champhionship

let alone the finals. i know he’ll soon have the most nba wins but that doesnt mean anything if u cant survive the playoffs. and he isn’t the right guy to take our team to the next level

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 28, 2008 11:15 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

yeah, this is the dumbest argument ever.

1st, he’s been to his conference championship before, 4x in fact. 82-83, 83-84, 85-86, 02-03

look their are plenty of good coaches or players that haven’t been there or won a title or whatnot. is Doc Rivers all of a sudden a good coach b/c he’s won a title? Riley was absolutely horrible w/ an aging Shaq and a 80% Wade… did he suddenly become a bad coach? are players like Barkley, Baylor, King not great? is KG only now considered great? before last season, he’d been out of the 1st round once.

Nellie is many things. gives up on big lineups too readily, inconsistent minutes, etc. come on, its the team.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 8:48 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

ummm

so which coach would guide this team with a bunch of third bananas to a respectable record?

All of our starters are no 3 options on good teams. Wake up and smell the coffee. We are a team with a bunch of Robins….we need a Batman plain and simple.

warriors dont fish they hunt!

by VonteegoCummings on Nov 28, 2008 11:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I've been saying fire nelly for the longest time!!

I wanna start a Fire Don Nelson movement! Our young guys will never develop the correct way under his coaching! I’ll make a post of the reasons why his time with the warriors should be done!! I’ll get started soon so stay tuned!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Nov 29, 2008 3:38 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for giving me a heads up...

on a post I don’t need to read!

by in for life on Nov 30, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

this team is simply not good enough

to win many games no matter who is coaching. this year has been a disaster because the players aren’t very good. i’m not saying nelson’s been fantastic this year, but pop and phil couldn’t have led this team to a winning record at this point. tons of roster turnover and an overall lack of talent make it really tough to win games. too much duplication at the wing positions, not enough depth at the pf, no real point guard, no one who can carry the team when they need to and you’re telling me that this should be a contender? it’s a poorly constructed team that needs another trade (sadly. i really don’t want to see the team have to adjust to yet another new guy, but it looks needed) to clear up the glut of wing players and add a scoring big or a draft pick or something.

the monta injury doomed this season. as much as we tried to talk ourselves into this being a playoff team, it just wasn’t going to happen. let’s wait for him to come back and at least make the team respectable. it won’t be a playoff team, but it could be a team that we’re not ashamed of and that’ll have to do for now.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 10:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Adjustments and team discipline

I was at the game last night. A humbling experience to say the least. I am continually frustrated by the lack of discipline on this team and I don’t think there’s anywhere else to look but to the coach.

When Dubs went with Wright and Biedrins together, they were able to board and run circles around Cleveland’s big men. But Nelly kept going back to a four guard line-up, which gave us no second chance points and stagnated the offense. We didn’t even shoot threes last night. We settled on one pass and jump shots with defenders in players faces. When we moved the ball, we were unstoppable.

We lost last night because instead of getting after Jackson and Maggette for not going to the hole, he insisted on yelling at Wright, probably one of the most active players on the court last night.

Bottom line: When the Dubs move the ball and slash and dish, no team can stick with their speed. Nelly probably looked interested in coaching for about 20% of the game last night. WHY DOESN’T HE COACH?!?!?!?! Yes we are lacking a big playmaker. But that should compel Nelly to coach up his players even more.

Duke grad student missing the Bay but holding it down for the Dubs from afar.

by eastbayglory on Nov 29, 2008 11:20 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

meh. it's the players.

look, you can change the coach, but it doesn’t have any real effect. the Bulls got rid of Skiles – didn’t do crap, turns out everyone just overrated their players b/c almost all of them shot good for 1 year. but Del Negro looks good now that Rose is playing lights out. Doc Rivers didn’t suddenly become a great coach nor did Riley suddenly become a bad one.

in professional sports, where you’re dealing with grown men, if your best players don’t preach whatever it is that the coach is teaching, it doesn’t matter who the coach is. your best players hold everyone else accountable – that’s why guy’s like Duncan, Jordan, Magic, Bird, Tom Brady/Joe/Steve/Ray Lewis/Ronnie Lott (in football) are so important.

we lost last night b/c we played a vastly superior team who clamped down on defense in the 3rd quarter. it wasn’t just b/c we moved the ball that we had success – it’s that we were able to move the ball b/c of the nonchalant defense that the Cavs were playing at the time.

like w/ all coaches, Nellie’s not w/o faults – gives up on big line ups too early, inconsistent rotation, etc. hate to keep harping on it, but you’d think w/ the Doc Rivers/Pat Riley teams of last year, this point would be obvious. it’s the players always has been, always will be.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 12:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The ONE thing I'd like to see Nelson start doing

Consistent rotations. Period. The warriors have a ton of problems, but I think the one of the easiest things he could do to stabalize the Dubs is simply say, look, heres our rotation, ABCDE are our starting 5, FGHIJ are coming off the bench for ABCDE starters. It’s got to be hard for some of our players to get into a playing rhythm when one night they play 30 minutes, they next they play 4, then the following game their starting, the next game they dont play until the 4th quarter. Lets try to get some semblance of consistency, let these guys find a rhythem to their game.

by kyzah on Nov 29, 2008 11:31 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Great point

It’s tough for guys to not know how they’re going to be used any given night. Consistency would really benefit the young guys especially.

Duke grad student missing the Bay but holding it down for the Dubs from afar.

by eastbayglory on Nov 29, 2008 11:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

dude..

its not the players. honestly, look at some of the talent on this roster and tell me
why the knicks have a better record, why the bobcats have a better record, why the pacers have a better record, why the bulls have a better record, why the nets have a better record. cuz they all have better coaching

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 12:58 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Come On...

You just lost all credibility after saying Vinny Del Negro is a better coach than Don Nelson. Terrible statement and a slap in the face to a Hall of Famer in Nelly.

by JimBarnett2KevinGarnett on Nov 29, 2008 1:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

forgot to mention...

all of the teams you listed are Eastern Conference teams…

by JimBarnett2KevinGarnett on Nov 29, 2008 1:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

okay good points

forget chicago. but do any of those other teams i mention have a credible star thats
leading his team? no. they are just like us. but they are getting farther.
and if aint the players, its the coaching. and i u wanna talk western teams,
the t’wolves and the grizzlies are right there with us

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 1:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

you gotta get league pass...

Vince is insane this year 48% FG, 40 from 3. 23, 5, 4.5, but Devin Harris is ripping it… 22.5 ppg 6.5 asst (3.5 to 1 assist/to) 45% FG.

i’m sure the Knicks will start losing now that they got rid of Crawford (who was shooting 45% from 3 for them) and Zach Randolph (20 & 12 for the Knicks).

Granger is killing it for the Pacers.. 24 ppg, 46, 37 from 3, plus TJ Ford is now on the team. and Marquis Daniels is having a career year so far, Rasho is underrated defending the low post and even Troy Murphy’s back to double doubles.

Bobcats, i don’t know… JRich/GWallace > Jack/Maggette??? they have played 10 games at home.

either way, these are all probably below .500 teams… but their 2 best offensive players are all > than our resident two, Jack & Maggette… another problem. these 2 are like Zach R. & Curry on the Knicks. they do the same things, don’t fit together. Crawford too.

we have 4 big problems. defending, rebounding, passing, and closing.

we have 1 guy who can defend his guy 1 on 1 75% of the time, Turiaf. everyone else needs help. Kelenna, an avg defender (can guard his own guy about 1/2 the time), is our 2nd best defender. Jack’s effort hasn’t been there all season… he’s too focused on offense. among starters, Crawford & Maggette might be the worst defenders at their positions in the entire league. at least top 5. we got bad defenders. Monta won’t help…

we have 1 guy who rebounds at a high rate for his position, Andris. everyone else is horrible. no atrocious may be a better word. Crawford & Jackson are two of the worst . Maggette has been poor. i’m guessing, but i think Randolph is the only guy with a decent rebounding rate. Monta won’t help… he rebounds okay for a 1, but that still moves Crawford and Jackson somewhere.

we can’t pass. we can’t even make an inbound pass. Monta may help… may.

closing, yet to be seen w/ Crawford, Monta.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maggette actually rebounds pretty well for a 3… Wright is okay, though no better, for a 4. But yeah, Crawford and Jackson are a brutal combo in that department.

God, the more I look at the Crawford addition, the more I hate it. I know he’s a pretty good player, and better than he’s shown so far. But all he effectively does for us is to double the flaws in Jack’s offensive game and to weaken our defense even more. I hate that he was brought in to fix a temporary problem — the lack of a point guard — especially since he’s not a player that can fix that problem. Just a horrible fit for this team.

The only way Crawford would really help would be if Nellie used his presence to completely change Jack’s role to that of a defensive stopper. When it’s his priority, Jack is a very good defender, but I agree with the monkey that he’s been focused on offense so far. We don’t need Jack to lead on offense, especially since Crawford gives us the same things (for good and for bad). We NEED Jack on defense. If Nellie could convince Jack that defense was the way he could lead this team, things would get a lot better.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 4:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

and who would step in

as our head coach??

=Gaucho=

by Gaucho! on Nov 29, 2008 2:20 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Keith Smart

I really liked it when it looked like Nellie was actually going to retire and Keith Smart would step in. There wouldn’t be the adjustment to a totally new coach because Keith has been with the team and everybody knows him. Keith could keep the components of Nellie’s system that actually work (few as they are) and work on revamping the rest. He always seemed like a level headed guy and I believe he’s well liked by both the players and the front office. But now that Nellie’s been given the extended contract, who knows when that will happen — if it ever does. I have a feeling Keith will be coaching another team way before Nellie ever leaves.

(and if it were someone who’s already been a head coach, my vote would go to Saunders)

by centerre on Nov 29, 2008 3:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nellies Style

His coaching style is to have a loose system with plenty of room for the main playmakers on the team to freestyle plays on the go and exploit the defense. This philosiphy worked well with Baron Davis because of his superior handles, passing, and scoring ability, which opened up free shots and lanes for the rest of the Dubs. Plain and simple, without a player as dominant as BD we can’t afford to play the same style of ball that we did the past few years. Unfortunately Nellie refuses to except this and resorts back to small ball time and time again, resulting in not so close losses that should have been close wins if we used the bigger lineup more IMO I see the pieces to have a balanced team with potent scoring and tough inside presence. Maybe it just wouldn’t work, but I would at least like to see it fail than to sit and speculate what could have been…

by Pearlsofwisdom on Nov 29, 2008 2:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Avery Johnson?

I wouldn’t mind seeing Avery Johnson take over for Nellie eventually, as weird as that sounds since Nellie tutored him, but Avery seems to stress defense and playing within the system a lot more. Plus I always like him as a warrior.

by Pearlsofwisdom on Nov 29, 2008 2:33 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Popovich is from the Nellie coaching tree too

i’d rather see Moncrief or Smart than Avery though. he pretty much did a number on Dirk by calling him out so much. and that iso offense he was running that pissed off Kidd so much isn’t exactly what i had in mind.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 3:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

why do so many of us forget

the kick in the crotch nellie gave avery in 2007? if that series wasn’t enough proof of who the better coach is, i can’t help you.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's possible...

…to one-up somebody who’s technically better than you. I love Nelson, but you have to face it; a head coach needs to be graded on how he coaches his teams on both sides of the ball. It seems like because Nelson’s teams never play D, people accept it. Don Nelson is a revolutionary and dynamic coach, and also one of the worst defensive coaches in NBA history. And unfortunately, you can’t be called a great coach if you ignore half of the game (the more important half, as results seem to show).

by Zack Vank on Dec 7, 2008 10:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

look all of you guys who disagree

i know the players should get partial blame, but lets look at some stats.
the last two years have been stephen jackson’s worst FG% years of his career.
i know his career fg% isnt great in itself, but its even worse than usual the last two years under nelson’s system. coincidence? maggette is also having his worst shooting year of his career. coincidence? jamal crawford cant buy a bucket since moving to golden state. coincidence? EVEN Turiaf. remember he’s always been making these jumpers against us? HIS numbers have dropped since joining golden state. well that might actually be a coincidence but come on… why do you think everyone’s been doing that? cuz nelson doesn’t teach them to pass the damn ball

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 2:46 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Jackson shot 40.3% in Indy in 04-05

but i’m guessing his adjusted , the one that accounts for 3’s, is probably about the same. actually, i just looked via ESPN, it’s higher. he’s shot about 46 if you accounted for the extra points you get on 3’s. he’s been at 48 & 50 w/ the Warriors, down to 45 this season, but if his 3 pt shooting normalizes to about 33%, i’m sure it’ll be around there.

Corey’s adj FG% has been about 45 to 50, he’s around 43 right now, but if his 20% 3 pt shot normalizes to his career 32%… he’ll probably be shooting about what he is.

i’d say Crawford is coincidence. anyone w/ league pass will tell you that he’s taking the same shots he took in NY, just less of them. besides he was bound to start missing after shooting an astronomical 45% in his 1st 10 or so games.

i refuse to watch Laker games b/c i hate them, yet they don’t lose a lot. but my brother watches them a lot and he says Turiaf got way more dunks down there.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

what, how does that make sense at all? Crawford and Maggette arent exactly high % shooters in case you failed to notice them before they came here.

by sam23 on Nov 29, 2008 3:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

avery definately has more defensive discipline than nellie

Though I just don’t see Nelson leaving unless he quits on his own… Nonetheless, I’m glad that we can “mostly” all agree that Nellie is doing a poor job this season. He is stubborn about changing his style (one big 4 smalls) but hopefully he will come around. He’s very smooth at deflecting criticism from the fans and media with humor which is usually a good thing, but keeps him from being forced to reflect or attempt change. It’s also sometimes a good thing to get on him as a fan just like it’s sometimes good for him to get on his players for poor shot selection. He can do a better job. I know it. And if he can’t I suspect he’ll see he’s unable to get results and take himself out of the picture cause I think he’s that type of person at this point in his life.

by ihatenellie on Nov 29, 2008 3:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Y'all are retarded..

all im gonna say.. after 15 games, I figured they were probably gonna be mediocre at best… apparently, most of you probably cant remember the Brian Winters days or even the PJ Carlesimo days, when they were flat out awful.. Nelsons been the Warriors most successful coach since Al Attles.. Or maybe u dont remember we were 48-34 last year? NELSON does not need to be let go. hmmmm.. damn bandwagoners… always gotta be fairweather when the teams in a slide…..

by warrior2thagrave on Nov 29, 2008 4:33 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Yep

Just a bunch of bandwagon idiots.

by SinceRunTMC760 on Nov 29, 2008 6:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

uhh

i have been and remain a warrior fan for life and have never supported another team thank you very much

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

come on, this is a horrible argument

it’s just like the championship, it really doesn’t say anything.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 10:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you're retarded!

first of all, i aint no bandwagoner and i’ve been through all the drama when it comes to the warriors! with a lineup of Baron Davis, Jason Richardson, Stephen Jackson, Al Harrington, Biedrins, Ellis, Barnes, Pietrus and the rest of the squad, Nelson just couldn’t make it work. He gave up on them, if you remember? i know we had Dunleavy and Murphy for the 1st half of the season but even after a long stretch of games with our new core of players, Nelson still couldn’t get it to work. He gave up and i don’t wanna hear you say it was to try to motivate them. he left them for dead and gave up! there is now way that he could have predicted that they would go on that winning stretch at the end of the season and sneak into the playoffs!! he was as amazed as i was that they made it! why should he get credit for bringing us to that point? his rotations suck. he rides his veterans til the wheels fall off. he has nothing but isolation plays and if they work the credit should go to the player who made the play happen. i don’t know who i want the coach to be but right now, for our team, it is not Nelson! and shut up before you get slapped! you too since runTMC 760. you’re an idiot for real!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 3:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you keep saying that he gave up

when did this happen? the warriors went on a killer run in the second half of that season, do you really think that he was sitting on the sidelines thinking that it was irrelevant and that the team sucked? and when did he fail to get it to work? right after the trade, before the roster got settled?
if he calls iso plays that work, of course the player should get credit, but he deserves some credit for realizing that right after a huge roster shakeup, it’s a bad idea to try to impliment a complex offense mid-season.

i do know who i want to coach this team, and it seems that so do a fair amount of us. that guy’s name is don nelson. the situation this year was not one that was going to allow for the warriors to breeze into the playoffs, take down a high seed and battle to a title. i’ve said it a dozen times in this particular thread, with the offseason the team had, the wins were not going to get here immediately. check back when monta returns, but even then, this isn’t a playoff season for us. sorry.

and honestly, threatening to slap someone over the internet is ridiculously childish, even if it was a metaphoric slap.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

whoa youre so smart!

shut the hell up you damn internet geek! haha if you read all of the posts, and look at the poll, notice who’s on the side of keeping nelson and who’s on the side of firing him! majority chooses that he is not the man for the job any longer! get off Nelson’s nuts! you even have him for you picture hahaha! what a loser, i guess losers don’t see other losers when their fat asses are right in front of them! please don’t pin your hopes on Monta’s return, the situation has gotten really bad between him and the front office and who knows what that could do to his mentality when it all plays out. Nelson gave up man, however you try to spin it, he gave up and the players made it happen! slap yourself loser boy!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 4:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

please read my post

i said a “fair amount” not a majority. i am well aware that more people want him fired than want him to stay, i am just pointing out that quite a few of us disagree. and i am not pinning my hopes on monta’s return, i said, “but even then, this isn’t a playoff season for us. sorry.”

for future reference, actually responding to things people say, instead of personally attacking them is a good way to have a discussion. you could also answer my question about why you think he gave up. just suggestions, that’s all.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2008 4:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

0.0...

knowledge or thought. Fire everyone, trade everyone… weak. Its sad that’s what this site has become…

by in for life on Nov 30, 2008 3:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

quick question

if so many of us seem to think that nellie is bombing this year, what’s our record with the greatest coach possible (i’ll let you make up who that would be)? are the dubs even 2 or 3 games better?

the team is bad. the guys out there are just not good enough. the construction of the team makes no sense, plus they are without monta and have had little time to mesh considering all the roster changes. these are not the types of conditions that bring out the best in players. with monta out, it is really easy for jack and maggette to just say, “it’s my team now, let me prove it.” and guess what, the team wouldn’t be as good with them on the bench all game. are we tossing morrow and kaz out there for 40 minutes? i hope not. it’s been a bad year, but given the circumstances, how can you be surprised?

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 6:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

think about it..

look at the knicks roster, look at our roster. similar? no star player. just a bunch of scrappy guys.
i actually think we have more talent on this team. so what is the difference? coaching. its that simple.
sure nelson was a good coach. even a GREAT coach. BUT, he really has no motivation to be coaching anymore. he’s gotten his money for the next 3 years. i really don’t think he’s hungry for a championship and i don’t care what you say. if he’s not gonna get us to the playoffs he is definitely not the guy to be developing our young players.

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 7:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the knicks

if there is any team in the league who has all the reason in the world to play better it’s them. they just got rid of isiah thomas! if you think those guys weren’t thrilled to start playing for mike d’antoni, you’re crazy. hell, any replacement there would have done wonders. they will come down to earth once the initial excitement wears off. if you want to see a team improve rapidly, get rid of the gigantic poison that was killing their front office and coaching the team, and then bench the player that is the biggest reminder of his failings. d’antoni was in a WAY easier circumstance than people thought before the season.

the warriors are in a very different boat. tons of turnover, lost boom, then saw monta crash his moped. could any coach have stopped maggette and jack for competing for the spotlight? i say no. of course nellie’s not getting us to the playoffs, no coach can.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 7:18 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

u agree we are going no where then?

then fire nelson and hire someone who knows how to develop young players

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 7:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There are no better options around.

Remeber the warriors the last time they went with this approach. The Mike Montgomery era blew up in our faces and there is no one better to teach young guys.

This is not nellie’s fault. It’s the fact we are the youngest team in the NBA and are not that good right now. The only thing that is goign to help is time for these young kids to learn and grow.

Too many people around here are expecting miracles over night and have fantasies of what this current team’s potential is at this young of an age.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

terry eagle's comment below

shows you why tonight’s loss was mostly on nellie’s defensive scheme

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 7:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

playing zone forces a team to shoot

they ried it in the second half, they tried changing things up. The zone wont help when the other team is hitting 3’s at that rate.

With us so young and our two best players injured, what do you expect. Nellie wasnt making our team sluggish. It was the playing 5 games in 7 nights.

If Biedrens doesnt miss 7 layups in his first 8 tries, it’s a different game. But he is wore out from playing all summer and then this long trip.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I assume...
Remeber the warriors the last time they went with this approach. The Mike Montgomery era blew up in our faces and there is no one better to teach young guys.

…that you’re claiming nobody is better than Nelson to teach our young players. I cannot possibly understand how somebody could draw that conclusion.

by Zack Vank on Dec 7, 2008 10:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

why kill next year's chances too?

we can bring in a new coach who will not be as good and then hope that he improves enough to not ruin next year. i just don’t see where that guy is. if we did look another direction, the only people who i see as real possibilities are jordan and casey. that’s not just the short list, it’s THE list of coaches who i think are worth looking at who are on the market. if you think one of them would be better than nellie, then talk to them, but know that the field is limited.

i think saunders and avery are not nearly as good of coaches as everyone seems to think. both led exceptionally talented teams to disappointing finishes in the playoffs. maybe they are good coaches, but they don’t get more out of a team than the talent that’s there and often get less out of them. when i see our team, i don’t see the sort of team that any of the guys i mentioned would do better with this year, or even next year than nellie would.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

no coach can.

  He could teach our guys the pick and roll that worked so well for the knicks? Better than letting them hoist up outside bricks?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 29, 2008 7:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That would be a help and it's a big killer of ours.

If you notice we started off not shooting as many 3’s. So I believe he told them to shoot them less. But when the Knicks started shooting well, there egos took over.

Just like how we beat the clippers earlier. Got them out of there game plan.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We are currently 5-12. 3 games better would make us 8-9… that’s a pretty huge difference. A three-game difference in 17 games ain’t chicken feed.

I think there are coaches — a lot of coaches — who could be 8-9 or maybe even 9-8 with this team right now. We’ve played a bunch of bad teams. We have a fair amount of talent. The lack of a true point guard is a real problem, and not Nellie’s fault, but we have enough talent to be competitive.

I don’t think we’ll fire Nellie, and we probably shouldn’t, but he has done an extremely bad job with a not-that-bad roster. Even without Monta, we have better than 5-12 talent. Nellie’s refusal to play big men has cost us several games.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 7:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Did you not see how bad wright and randolph

were tonight on defense.
Turiaf wouldnt have helped earlier when they were so hot on 3’s, He would have made it worse.
It’s our players are too young and just not that good right now.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dog, David Lee had 37 points tonight, almost exclusively on dunks, and a career-high 21 rebounds. AL HARRINGTON had 12 rebounds.

Wright and Randolph make mistakes on defense, but they WEREN’T bad tonight defensively. Yeah, Wright got used once, and Randolph got dunked on, but we played infinitely better defense when they were in, because we had size to match. They affected shots. They got rebounds. Same thing with Turiaf.

You weren’t watching this game very closely if you thought the problem was anything other than size. We did well with two bigs in, poorly almost every other time. The problem wasn’t that Wright and Randolph weren’t good… the problem was that they weren’t playing.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 7:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We did with two bigs in when it was Bieds and Turiaf

But I disagree that tonight when Randolph or Wright were in we did better. They were out of position alot. Looks like the speed confused them. They tried to do to much and got caught where they shouldnt be.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It doesn’t matter if you agree or not… this isn’t subjective.

We were +1 when Brandan Wright was in the game.
We were +1 when Anthony Randolph was in the game.
We lost the game by 13.

As a practical matter, as a matter of math, we did better when those guys were on the floor. You may have thought they were out of position, but in fact they weren’t any more out of position than any other Warriors tonight… they certainly played better defense than Biedrins did.

“Tried to do too much”? In 18 minutes, they were 4 of 5 from the field, had five rebounds, two assists, two blocks and a steal, with two turnovers. Double those minutes and you get a guy who goes for 16 and 10 a night on 80% shooting, with four assists, four blocks and two steals. And yeah, four turnovers. But that guy would be the best player in the league. Which probably explains why we won the brief segments those guys played, on an otherwise horrible night.

There is no defense for Don Nelson tonight. He can whine about the young guys all he wants. The truth is, they delivered and he didn’t.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 8:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it's not just the talent

it’s the situation. the warriors do have mediocre talent, but given the way the offseason went, there was no way this team was going to be competitive. i just don’t see how you can lose your best player to free agency, then his heir apparent to a moped related injury, and hope that the fairly good players on your team will step up and play well in an unselfish way. this was a team with guys who saw this as their chance to prove that they were all-stars, but weren’t. jack and maggette started shooting too much and trying to prove that they could be “the man.” nelson couldn’t have stopped that. the season was lost from the start and guys started looking for their shot. if anything, having a few relatively talented guys was a determent, because they thought they were better than they were.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 29, 2008 10:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LETS START A PETITION

WE NEED TO FIRE NELLIE. HE DOESNT KNOW HOW TO SINPIRE OUR GUYS OR TEACH THEM HOW TO PLAY DEFENSE. I really didnt think that Baron leaving was going to affect us this much….or maybe its just BAD COACHING….and if we are going to lose…I would rather lose watching our young guys develop. I.E. Wright. Randolph. and Morrow. Not to mention we have 0 ball movement. Its pathetic. ANd IM PISSED OFF.

by ez0es on Nov 29, 2008 7:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Coaching Mistake

When a guy like Duhon gets 20 plus assists you either need to play extended zone or press or do something to take the ball out of his hands. Nellie does nothing – this does piss me off. At least let someone else cover Duhon. Poor coaching – Nellie looks old and out of touch.

by terryteagle on Nov 29, 2008 7:26 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Or the fact your two best players are injured

you have a very young team and on the road at the end of a very tiring 5 games in 7 days trip.
Wow after all that and we lost against a team with a better record on their court. Why are people acting like this is nellie’s fault. No coach could do much better with the current situation.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jack is not one of our two best players. He may not be one of our four best players. You only think he is because Nellie has let him do whatever he wants, and that’s a ding against Nellie.

The Knicks were very banged up, both roster-wise and psychologically, heading into tonight. We had the talent to beat that team. Nellie completely misused that talent.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 7:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Normally jackson is not a 2 best player.

But at this point who is better on this team?

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Then if they are

You definatley cant blame Nellie for tonight’s loss.

Biedrens missed 7 of his first 8 layups.
Mags continues to take takes bad 3’s and turn over the ball alot.
Crawford had a horrible shooting night.

So with our 3 best players in the game all having horrible nights, it’s still nellies fault??

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

um...

i already pointed something out about this. maggette and jackson are both having their worst shooting years in their career this season, under nelson. jackson wasn’t much better last year. crawford is usually a much better shooter, but since coming to the warriors has gone cold. biedrins had an off-night, i admit. but hello, are the rest coincidences?

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 7:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It may not be a coincidence

But I don’t think it’s because of Nelson. I think with any coach right now they would be shooting that way. It may just be the wrong group of people together. There flowing off of each other’s bad habits. They have been in the league for awhile and won’t listen to coaches making less than them. I believe it’s more of just the wrong collection of players. I’m not saying I’m right or your wrong. Just what I believe.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 7:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You really need to watch this game again (God help you). Everybody shot fine. The problem was that the Knicks could score literally anytime they wanted, because they had size advantages all over the floor.

I love Nellie. He’s deservedly a legendary coach, and I like his style. But he flat-out sucked tonight.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea we got beat badly.

I just don’t think any collection of our current players active tonight would have changed it in to a win.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 8:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i think

a biedrins/turiaf/maggette/crawford/watson look was just fine

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 8:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Or Biedrins/Wright/Maggette/Crawford/Watson. Hell, sub Randolph and Morrow in for Wright and Crawford and we’d have had a shot, and I hate Randolph’s game.

These were the New York Knicks. Al was fired up, so they were going to be tougher than usual, but they’re not a good team. Nellie just handed D’Antoni the game on a silver platter, and D’Antoni shrugged and took it. It’s that simple.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 8:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

When the other team's shoots 48% on 3's

and takes almost 30 attempts. If we go bigger, it wouldn’t have helped stop the long shot they had. We try to stop one the kill us on the other. We were just to tired after a long trip and they just had a good night of shooting.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Those things are both true. We were tired, and they were shooting well… they’d probably have shot well no matter who we put out there.

But there’s a difference between giving up 120 points and giving up 138. It didn’t have to be this bad. It was Nellie’s small-ball insanity that made it such a record-breaking night for the Knicks. A more normal lineup definitely could’ve snuck out a win here, even with all the threes they were draining.

by onlxn on Nov 29, 2008 8:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe

More people aren’t noticing this. Onlxn, you have it dead on. Today we lost because we played 4 smalls and 1 big. We have been consistently making mediocre centers look like allstars. Why? because we play small-ball with Maggette at the 4, leaving Biedrins all alone while everyone else let’s their defenders get by. If anything, just look at the 4th quarter of this game. We had two bigs in, and suddenly the Knicks only score 22 points in the quarter vs the 30 somethings in the last 3.
Nelson has to stop forcing his philosophy, when he doesn’t have the players for it.

by Sebulver on Nov 30, 2008 3:34 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was our best lineup tonight

I agree with that. But with as bad as Biedrens and Crawford did on the offensive end and Turiaf not being a scorer. If we went with that line up most of the night. I just don’t believe we would have won.

by The Golden One on Nov 29, 2008 8:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i still really don't see any excuse to lose to knicks

  How about getting out played and out coached? That’s a pretty good one?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 29, 2008 8:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

meaning

don nelson got outcoached, and his players couldn’t play defense cuz he never thought them how?

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

did anyone see Harrington tonight?

any of you wanting to fire Nelson are looking at the wrong issues – game planning, players’ shooting woes, etc.

for a coach is supposed to be great at getting everything out of his players, particularly veteran players, he screwed up with Al over the last year or so.

Lot’s of Al haters here, and I’m sure they’ll all be heard, but Nelson was partner to the spiral and we ended up losing a versatile veteran and picked up a player with that duplicated our depth and has another albatross contract.

ya, it’s the players, but we need to construct a roster with a plan – not reacting to poor player-coach relationships, poor decisions to extend players needlessly, poor trades (MWilliams) …

by hardcore on Nov 30, 2008 8:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it's a young team...

but it can win with a few simple adjustments. a zone look, enter in two big men to stop david lee, and this game would have been in the bag? turiaf and biedrins were playing so well together against the celtics, but nelson instead decided to go smaller and that cost us in the 3rd quarter also. its true. Nelson probably won’t be fired. but the point is he should be. this team didn’t have high expectations but to lose to a banged up knicks team like Onlxn says above is ridiculous

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 29, 2008 7:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

The Knicks Were Shorthanded

No excuses – the pick and roll killed us down the stretch and could have been stopped with simply adjustments. 3’s come and go but a pick and roll will kill everytime.

by terryteagle on Nov 29, 2008 8:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

if the warriors lose their matcup against the thunder

THEN firing nellie should become a consideration

by HoLdEmUP on Nov 29, 2008 9:13 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

anyone else having 94-95 flashbacks?

superstar player leaves (albeit under much different circumstances), team falls apart… and the rest is purgatory.

by the evil monkey on Nov 29, 2008 11:26 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I wonder if david lee would've had 37 points and 21 rebounds if turiaf played more than 10 minutes

I mean he’s only our best interior defender and league leader in blocks per minute but it wouldn’t make any sense to play him lets give nelly a 10 year extension

by gsfan on Nov 30, 2008 12:36 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

my biggest beef with Nellie’s rotation is that he doesn’t play Turiaf as much as possible. Ronny should be fouling out every game before he gets taken out.

but whatever we can always point to the 5th game in 7 nights excuse…

by the evil monkey on Nov 30, 2008 1:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I normally

don’t enjoy the negativity of your posts, but you are completely right about this. Ronny has a huge effect on the game when he is in with Biedrins, or even with Wright or Randolph. Sure it’s more conventional, and Nelson would want to play anything but that kind of basketball, but that’s the only style that works with us at the moment. Now, if Maggette was nailing those threes, and hustling on defense, boxing out, and going for rebounds, maybe small-ball could work. But he hasn’t been doing any of that, while shooting a disgusting, 19% from the arc. I like Maggette at the 3, and would love to see him and Jackson rotate at that position, but when he’s at the 4, the team suffers immensely.

by Sebulver on Nov 30, 2008 3:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

every time turiaf and biedrIns are on the floor together our defense DRAMATICALLY improves. what did nelly expect putting bellinelli, maggette, and crawford on the floor at the same time to start the game? they are all horrible defenders, we would have given up that many points to any team

i love what nelly’s done for the franchise the last two years but that doesn’t mean he isnt doing a bad job with this years team. in my opinion this team has enough talent to be at 500 right now.

by gsfan on Nov 30, 2008 1:26 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Fire his fat a$$!!!

I think I actually hate don nelson!! He’s on my mike dunleavy hate level!!! Fat bastard!!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Nov 30, 2008 2:38 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

just 1 question

where’s Chuck Daly?

(sorry if this sounds dumb, but his name just came to my mind out of nothing…)

=Gaucho=

by Gaucho! on Nov 30, 2008 7:14 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

FINALLY

someone else in the world admits nellie is a crappy coach

by gswLLBatman on Nov 30, 2008 1:10 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I can’t go so far as to say that Nellie’s a crappy coach. His track record is impressive… he’s won with some middling teams over the years. I thought he coached us extremely well in ‘06-’07, and fairly well last year.

But he is an extremely crappy coach for this team, at least so far. It’s a roster that lends itself to a more traditional lineup, and Nellie has been completely unwilling to acknowledge that. I’m still hopeful that he’ll make some needed adjustments, but I’m not convinced they’ll come. He’s a stubborn guy.

by onlxn on Nov 30, 2008 1:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly. This team is not suited for Nelson whatsoever. He is not adapting to his roster, he is trying to force his roster to adapt to him.

by belilaugh on Nov 30, 2008 4:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Nelson has a set system that he runs and needs players that can make things happen on their own. He does not play to his players strengths and forces them to be something their not. Example: Harrington/Center, Maggette/4 spot, Jackson/Point Guard, Dunleavy/Point Forward (What the F?). Look at how well Pietrus is doing now besides his injury. Van Gundy is playing to all of his strengths by making him a slasher and not expecting him to be a ball handler, granted he does have Dwight Howard to play off of, but still! Look at Barnes in Phoenix playing superb basketball! Look at Dunleavy before his injury playing great basketball and that’s tough for me to say because i hate that guy! look at Anthony Roberson haha dropping dimes and hitting big shots against us and last but not least, look at Al Harrington grabbing 12 boards along with scoring 36 pts! (RIDICULOUS!!!!) We have a good enough roster right now (in my opinion) to make a lot more noise in the league. We have speed/length in Wright,Randolph,Biedrins. we have a defensive anchor in Ronnie Turiaf, Biedrins and Stephen Jackson. we have ball handlers like Crawford and Watson even Marcus Williams but he don’t get no play thanks to Nellie! we have shooters to spread the floor (though they are streaky) in Bellinelli,Morrow,Jack, Crawford. we have a whole mess of potent scorers in Maggette,Crawford,Jack and when Monta comes back, him too! we have a lot of the things necessary to become a winning team. the only things we do lack are experience, cohesiveness, good coaching (NELLIE AS THE PRIMARY REASON), true point guard (maybe we’d have one in Marcus Williams if Nelly would let him operate and play within his capabilities! i believed and i still believe that he was gonna be a good point guard for us because he has a pass first mentality and if Nelson could create some plays off the ball, Marcus WIlliams would be able to find people in scoring positions! Don Nelson is not the right coach for our young, developing team. I want a coach who still has passion for the game, not one that just barks orders and has the look of disappointment and frustration on his face as he sits his fat a** in his chair. i want a coach like Byron Scott who stands and demands brilliance from his players (maybe that’s Eddie Jordan)! i want a young coach who is going to teach and lead our young players instead of expecting them to produce right away! Right now the Warriors are playing uninspired basketball and everyone is out to try to get theirs and theirs only!! Nelson is at the end of his rope and so am I, with him mainly and with this losing streak. I bet you he can’t stand playing all these young guys but he’s in a position where he has no other options. Don Nelson could care less, he’s already paid and the reality of not winning an NBA championship as a coach has probably already set in his fat mind a long time ago. all he has to do is collect his check and show up to games and practice! he’s lost his fire and soul for the game which is why he needs to be replaced!! i respect what he did for our organization and as a player but i’m done with this guy!! he has too much power and needs to be stopped!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 1, 2008 9:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

question is...

who’s gonna replace Nellie?
Avery Johnson?
Eddie Jordan?
Steven Jackson?
Adonal Foyle?
John MCcain?
Obama?

by AlbinoWhale on Nov 30, 2008 1:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Musselman

    I’d like to give him another try. He seemed pretty good at Sacto, speaking of sacto, what about adleman?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 30, 2008 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rowell..

Should take a majority of the blame in my opinion, with Mullin second. He’s the one who apparently thought it would be better to effectively trade Baron and his contract for Maggette and his contract. Brilliant…

BUT, even before Monta got hurt, the team was going into the season with a flawed concept. Not even Nellie would say publicly that he though Monta was ready to handle the point. And even if he was ready, making him play the point was a silly because it forces him to take his mind off what he does best. This bothers me more than anything. If we still had Baron or another quality point guard would anyone be talking about rushing to make Monta the point guard? Its moronic, he’s a great scorer why can’t that be enough for now?

And while I’m looking back, talk about defending Nellie, what made the 06/07 team (and last years’ for that matter) so exciting was the very fact that NOBODY thought either of those teams would do as well as they did. They were a bunch of cast aways and Nellie put them in the perfect system for their combined abilities/personalities. Those teams were held together with duct tape and bailing wire so credit Nellie for somehow making something out of nothing.

Fast forward to now, this team doesn’t have even close to the same talent or personality. No more J Rich, Barnes, Pieturs, Harrington, and most importantly no more all-star calliber point guard… So sure, he could use some different lineups and substitutions but the sad fact is that this just is not a good team. Nobody on this roster besides Biedrins and Jackson would be starting on a good NBA team and they would the # 3 or 4 options at that.

Don’t be distracted by the stubborness and attitude, the problem is with a front office that has both no leadership and a mettling owner.

by in for life on Nov 30, 2008 4:16 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

in for life

i get what ur saying. rowell has screwed up this team. but why say mullin is second to blame? mullin wanted to give baron the extension and i really like the moves mullin made to replace people like barnes and pietrus and harrington. imagine this team with baron at the point instead of maggette. don’t you think it’s a way deeper and stronger team than last year? i really don’t see mullin having anything to do with this. as for nelson, sure he can run a great offense, but he is too unconventional. you can’t always put the small lineup out there, and u gotta play defense, or your gonna get outrebounded and no matter how much you score, the other team is gonna put up for points. and with a young, developing team that’s not gonna make the playoffs, he is not the right coach to be introducing them to the next level.

by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Nov 30, 2008 4:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mullin...

failures have been well-documented. Starting with his first move, firing the most successful coach since Nellie Vol. 1 Eric Musselman. Not to mention the rediculous contract extensions he granted Dunmurphy Foyle and Richardson… On the other hand he’s had some good drafts and some lucky trades but overall the results have been mixed whether Rowel is behind the Baron/Maggette debaucle or not.

The bottom line is that the current team is not good and its not Nellie’s fault this is what he’s been given to work with. Nellie could do all the micromanaging of substitution, disciplining, conventional thinking humanly possible and it won’t change the fact that GSW does not have a prime-time NBA lineup right now.

In fact, your last statement proves my point about Mullin. Mullin and Rowel have put together a team that Nelson is not best-suited to coach, as you noted. That said, in defense of Mullin most of the great coaches in this league are not great builders. Phil Jackson, Pat Reilly, George Karl, Doc Rivers, etc probably would do a lot worse with these GSW teams than Nellie has/will… There are only so many Jerry Sloans and Larry Browns to go around the league.

by in for life on Nov 30, 2008 10:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but Mullin’s responsible for bringing in Marcus Williams, Jamal Crawford and Corey Maggette. 3 defensive zeroes.

Marcus Williams is forgivable b/c they took a Celtics w/ POB chance on a youngster and it didn’t really cost them. Maggette & Crawford hamstring the dubs and reminds me of guys like John Starks, Larry Hughes, Chris Mills, and Speedy Claxton. guys that’ll get you to 25-30 wins or no man’s land in the NBA.

let’s say Baron instead of Maggette, it’s not deeper than last year. in terms of guys who are legitimate NBA players right now, it’s Turiaf & Crawford for Pietrus, Barnes and Harrington. 2 to 3. i’m not ready to throw Wright into this mix (until he has enough weight to not be a match up gimmick player), but if you are it’s still 3-3. not deeper. and w/o Monta so far it’s 3-4.

as much hope as we’ve all placed in the young (drafted & undrafted) guys, the chances that they are all going to turn into productive NBA players is slim to none. it’s realistic to think that only AR & BW may still be in the league in 3-4 years. even the most promising, morrow – may at best end up being nothing more than a Legler (though 43% from 3 over your career isn’t bad) or a James Jones type.

nellie, meh. i’m not a fan, but getting rid of your coach is a short term fix. the wizards are still the wiz, the thunder are still the thunder. last yr the bulls were still the bulls.

this just feels like 94-95 when we lost a superstar, had 3 near 20 pt scorers (spree 20.6, hardaway 20.1, mully 19), fans were excited about 3 rookie bigs – donyell marshall 14.8 ppg 6.5 reb, carlos rogers 9 pts 6 rebs in 20 min/g & Cliff Rozier 6.8 ppg, 7.4 reb in 22 min/g. fans were crying out for more minutes for the bigs (Gatling & Seikaly & Big Vic) and fans were excited about some young rookies out of nowhere (22 yr old Ryan Lorthridge & 23 yr old Dwayne Morton). 14-31 under Nellie then 12-25 under Lanier and the rest is, well, history.

by the evil monkey on Nov 30, 2008 10:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice post...

and I for one always wanted more minutes for Gatling!! haha

by in for life on Nov 30, 2008 11:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wright only seems like a matchup gimmick player because he’s been used that way. He’s played well against everyone, big and small. He’s already a better player than Barnes and Pietrus, and a MUCH better player than either was for us last year.

Talk like this makes me think people are really forgetting how poorly Barnes and Pietrus played last year. They’re playing a bit better this year (or were, in Pietrus’s case), sure, but what does that have to do with your comparison? And if you really want to take this year as the gospel, hell, CJ Watson’s playing just as well as either of them.

I’m not contending that we’re a deeper team than last year. We’ve taken a big step backward, especially since the Crawford trade, which zeroed out our flexibility and doubled us up on Jack and Maggette’s worst qualities. But for God’s sake, the lack of Al and Pietrus and Matt Barnes has nothing to do with our current struggles. Our struggles are mainly due to 1) the loss of Baron, 2) the lack of Monta, and 3) the bizarre fact that Nellie has used the absence of those two small guys to go even smaller. Baron’s gone, but the other two things are fixable, by time and sanity.

There are, indeed, a lot of painful parallels to ‘94-’95, but the odds of another season as nightmarish as that one just aren’t high. (I forgot that we had nine players average double figures that year, thanks to all the injuries and trades and chaos). Andris Biedrins and Brandan Wright are — we’re talking present tense — both better than any of the bigs we had back then. It’s not like the warts on ‘Yell and Rozier weren’t obvious at the time… I kinda hated those guys. Wright doesn’t have those warts. The only thing he’s missing is playing time. Plus, c’mon… nobody was excited about Dwayne Morton.

I’m expecting a bad season, a deeply frustrating season, but I’m not expecting another ‘94-’95. There’s a competitive lineup in this team somewhere. At some point, whether through pressure from above, boredom, or sheer accident, Nellie will find that lineup.

by onlxn on Dec 1, 2008 12:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

goosefrabah

relax. #1, the point wasn’t that these guys are the reasons we aren’t doing well. the point was that we’re not “deeper and stronger” than last year as MeTaLLiCs0naTaS claimed.

  1. just b/c guys shot bad doesn’t mean they didn’t contribute.

and that’s just barnes. he still upped most of his other stats his reb rate, ass rate, etc. do you not value individual or team defense at all? toughness?

pietrus wasn’t the 06-07 version shooting wise, but he still shot respectable. he reduced his TOs dramatically, upped his steals and was an important factor in a lot of games during the stretch run before his injuries. he fouled a lot, but his defense was always there.

come on, do you not pick up on all the rotational mistakes these guys make? you’re crushing on Wright way too much if you can’t see all the liabilities he has on defense and limitations based on size. either way, i’m not going to try & sway you on him b/c that’s impossible. i don’t want to sound like a Wright basher. he’s efficient. he usually plays within himself. at worst, he’ll still be a solid off the bench guy for years to come.

anyway, the point still remains that this year’s team isn’t deeper. counting Wright it still only has 8 guys who are rotational type guys which is the same as last year if you don’t count guys like Croshere, CJ, Webber, Wright, Mbenga.

dude, i was a little kid delivering papers back then and i remember reading in those very papers where journalists thought Morton (who was a rookie at the time) was going to be a solid rotational bench guy for years to come, just like DeMarcus Nelson.

by the evil monkey on Dec 1, 2008 1:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Barnes and Pietrus were not nearly the defensive assets people think they were. Toughness, sure, accompanied by scads of stupid fouls. Our defense isn’t actually much worse than it was last year — most of our regression has been on offense.

Rotational mistakes? Sure, there’ve been loads of them. Maggette, Crawford, Azbuike, even Biedrins… we’ve been displaying some of the worst rotating on defense I’ve ever seen. Wright has not been a big part of that problem. Our defense has been better whenever he’s played. He looks overmatched in the sense that he’s skinny, but his length and energy make him a defensive asset anyway. Look at the numbers, watch the games. Wright is a good player.

I agree that we’re not particularly deeper than last year, but our fourth through eighth-best players are much better than our fourth through eighth last year, and I say that as someone who wishes Jamal Crawford had never darkened our door. Complementary players aren’t the issue. The problem is that two of our top three from last year are missing.

And I can deal with the idea that Dwayne Morton = DeMarcus Nelson, considering the Nelson is probably the eighth-most hyped young ‘un on the squad. I’ll admit, I was a Lorthridge fan. God, friggin’ ‘94-’95.

by onlxn on Dec 1, 2008 7:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i still think last year’s versions of barnes & pietrus would be 2 of our 3 best defenders (with Turiaf).

yeah, but the stats also say out of our top 7 (in terms of positive point differential), 5 man units – Maggette at PF is a part of 4 of them, and Harrington a part of 2… i think we agree, contrary to the stats, less small ball is better.

and the stats say that Andris makes our defense worse 112.7 points per 100 possessions which is 2nd only to Maggette unless you count Crawford, then he’s 3rd. btw, Kurz 95.1 points per 100 possessions, only guy even under 105. more Kurz! anyway, the #‘s are skewed by who has played with other big men. Randolph & Wright rarely play w/o another big on the floor, hence their defensive #’s are better, while their offensive #’s are worse (than Andris/Turiaf).

depends who you put in at 4-8. last year AB was 4th, this year he’s in the top 3. either way, 4-8 or whatever fit better into the system last year. again, i don’t want to sound like a Wright hater, i like him and think he should get at least 15-20 minutes consistently. like randolph, he can be an asset on team defense b/c of length alone.

by the evil monkey on Dec 1, 2008 10:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i still think last year’s versions of barnes & pietrus would be 2 of our 3 best defenders (with Turiaf).

Jackson, at his best, is a better defender than either, but he certainly hasn’t been at his best so far this season. Barnes and Pietrus would definitely be two of our better defensive players… they’re solid defensive players. And I’m open to the possibility that they’re better defensive players than Wright. They’re significantly worse on offense, though, which is why Wright’s the best player of the three. Either the Suns or Magic would absolutely jump at the chance to trade their guys for Wright.

yeah, but the stats also say out of our top 7 (in terms of positive point differential), 5 man units – Maggette at PF is a part of 4 of them, and Harrington a part of 2… i think we agree, contrary to the stats, less small ball is better.

Are we looking at the same stats? According to the lineups at 82games.com, every lineup with Maggette at the four has a negative point differential, with the exception of the lineup that features Morrow… we know why that short-lived lineup did well, and it didn’t have much to do with defense. The stats underline the obvious: the bigger lineups are better, both defensively and overall.

(Interestingly, many of the lineups featuring Harrington at the four and Maggette at the three had positive differentials. Al had a negligible effect last year… if anything, this’d lead you to believe that Maggette is a positive contributor at small forward. That’s consistent with his last several years.)

The various defensive statistics of the big men don’t totally strike me as relevant — I agree that Wright’s look better than Biedrins’s due to context. The more general point, which you made, is that we’re a dramatically better defensive team with two bigs on the floor. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if a traditional lineup would give us better overall defense than we had last year, even with the horrible D of Crawford and Maggette. Every time we have two bigs in there, we start blocking a lot of shots, and a lot of blown assignments in the backcourt are covered for.

depends who you put in at 4-8. last year AB was 4th, this year he’s in the top 3. either way, 4-8 or whatever fit better into the system last year. again, i don’t want to sound like a Wright hater, i like him and think he should get at least 15-20 minutes consistently. like randolph, he can be an asset on team defense b/c of length alone.

I’d put Biedrins at #3 last year… he’s better, and certainly more important, than Jackson. This year, I’d go Biedrins/Monta/Maggette as our top three. For all the hate Maggette gets, much of it deserved, he helps us when he’s not a 4… his numbers are a lot better than Jack’s.

I think our 4-8 this year are Jack, Wright, Crawford, Turiaf and either Watson or Azubuike. Compare that to last year: Jack, Harrington, Barnes, Pietrus, Azubuike. There’s no question in my mind that this year’s 4-8 is better.

Jack = Jack. He played much better last year, but I don’t think his skills have diminished… he’s a comparable talent.

Wright > Al. He just is. Wright has his weaknesses, Wright is skinny, Wright is still somewhat untested… but over the last two years, Wright has played better NBA basketball than Al has ever played. Yeah, Al torched us the other night to rub it in Nellie’s face. He’s still just Al Harrington.

Crawford and Barnes… look, I like Matt Barnes’s game better than I like Crawford’s game. Barnes, at his best, is a very helpful player. He’s somewhat underrated around the league, while Crawford is overrated. Having said that, I think it’s a stretch to say Matt Barnes is a better player than Jamal Crawford. Crawford is far more consistent and far more useful on offense, even if he is a country mile worse on defense… he’s better than he’s shown so far. Let’s call this one a push.

Turiaf > Pietrus. Pietrus can do more types of things, but what Turiaf does, he does extremely well. Pietrus might win you a few more games than Turiaf, but he’ll certainly lose you a few more. I’m pretty confident that what Turiaf does contributes more to a winning team than what Pietrus does.

Azubuike = Azubuike. Watson’s season so far is frankly better than any season ‘Buike has had, but I’m not totally buying Watson yet. Azubuike is the same player he was last year… like Crawford, he’s very consistent at his level.

To argue that our 4-8 is worse this year is to argue that we really miss Al Harrington, and to do that is to forget Al Harrington. I really liked him, but he wasn’t all that helpful of a player. Wright does more to win you games than Al does.

Below that, in 9-11, we have Watson, Randolph and Morrow. Our next-biggest guys in minutes a season ago were Croshere, a much crappier Watson, and a rarely-seen Wright, who got fewer minutes per game than Webber and Troy Hudson. Watson, Randolph and Morrow is not a bad deep bench.

The supporting cast here is in okay shape… frankly better shape than it was a year ago. The missing stars are the problem, that and the coaching. Monta Ellis and bigger lineups could get us respectable again in a hurry. The first is coming; we can only hope that the second will.

by onlxn on Dec 1, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hm. i’d go BD, Jack, Monta vs. Jack, Maggette, AB (obviously with the hypothetical being BD, Jack, AB).

yes, we have more potential, but in return we have less experience. historically, young guys = bad defense. i don’t think our young guys buck this trend. even good young defenders like Robin Lopez & Mayo aren’t yet up to par. the only guy i can think of off the top of my head is Mbah a Moute.

by the evil monkey on Dec 2, 2008 1:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

oh one more thing. in regards to individual defense. Pietrus & Barnes, while not always effective, didn’t always require double team help on their man. i’d say they were above average for NBA players in this regard. Wright always needs help, even against the Tim Thomas’ Bargnani’s and Blatche’s of the league. not so much against the Kenyon Martin’s. even though Bosh is 10x better than Jermaine, i’d say Wright at least has a fleeting chance 1on1 against Bosh – whereas he’d get pushed down low and either give up buckets or offensive rebounds to Jermaine.

by the evil monkey on Dec 1, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not quite sure what you’re saying here… Wright always needs help, except when he doesn’t?

Wright needs help sometimes, but not nearly as much as you’d think. He’s held his own against everyone he’s had a chance to play against so far, and I haven’t noticed a lot of people coming to bail him out, partially because nobody’s helping anybody right now. Actually, Wright’s doing more helping than most. He probably is a less talented individual defender than Barnes or Pietrus, but he’s a much better helper than they were. I don’t think there’s a sea of difference between him and them defensively.

by onlxn on Dec 1, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hm, i thought the Bosh (face up guy) vs Jermaine (back to the basket) was clear enough

anyway, Wright always needs help against bigger guys who can post while not so much against skinnier guys. since most big guys are big, he’ll have problems.

you’re entitled to your opinion. imo, B & P are better in rotations, can defend more positions, and defend their positions better.

by the evil monkey on Dec 1, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

er just noticed the bold... if you have league pass archive

you can watch Bargnani, Warrick, insert Sacto bigman name here, Jefferson, Gooden, KG, Evans, Tim Thomas, Blatche all use him either down low or on the W’s defensive glass. this is what happens w/o help.

though i’m starting to think you can’t be objective on him.

by the evil monkey on Dec 2, 2008 12:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, you’re entitled to your opinion on my objectivity. I think Brandan Wright has a number of significant defensive flaws… I think Barnes and Pietrus are currently better defenders than he is. I do think Wright’s a better player then they are, and the numbers back that up.

Also, your list here is a little bizarre. Wright didn’t play in the Clipper game, so didn’t encounter Thomas there… he played six minutes in the Knicks game, and didn’t cover Thomas for much of those six. Played eight minutes in the Raptors game, and didn’t cover Bargnani for much of those eight. Garnett had a fairly bad game against us… all the Celtic bigs did, in fact. Biedrins covered Jefferson. Blatche beat everyone, not just Wright, and did it mainly with jumpers, so clearly Wright’s bulk wasn’t the issue.

I have League Pass, dog… I’m starting to wonder if you do. You seem to just be listing big men we’ve faced, without any thought as to whether Wright played or how they fared against him. Between this and the stats you misquoted above, it seems like you’re really grasping at straws here.

Brandan Wright makes some defensive mistakes, as any young player does, but the idea that he constantly needs help on defense is something you’ve simply imagined. He doesn’t often get help on defense, he doesn’t need it all that often either, and we play better defense when he’s on the floor. You’ve misevaluated him.

by onlxn on Dec 2, 2008 1:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

um. tim thomas.... knicks?

if league pass archive is up, watch toronto game. bargnani vs wright.

by the evil monkey on Dec 2, 2008 1:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nba.com

use your e-mail / password (just in case you didn’t know)
it’s the broadband channel you click on.

you can fast forward to that part it’s early on in the game.

by the evil monkey on Dec 2, 2008 1:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not gonna back and watch that horrible Knick game, but Wright played six minutes against them. In those minutes, he and Thomas each scored four points… Wright also blocked a shot and got a couple rebounds. I don’t remember Wright getting used any more than anybody else in that game… I mainly remember Biedrins sprinting towards Chris Duhon while David Lee would happily skip to the basket. God, that was brutal.

The Raptors game, yeah… Bargnani had a big run when Wright was in. But Brandan Wright can be an effective defensive power forward without being able to cover Andrea Bargnani. Bargnani is a big-ass dude, not only in weight but in length… he’s a rare player who can both outmuscle Wright and reach past him. If Wright struggles against centers, I’m okay with that. I just want him to be able to defend power forwards, and so far, he’s been able to.

by onlxn on Dec 2, 2008 1:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i’m sure you’ll probably at least remember when tim thomas backed him down in the post and dunked on him?

by the evil monkey on Dec 2, 2008 10:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I do remember that. I remember that happening to all sorts of players, big and small, over the years… you screw up your positioning against a big dude, you’ll get dunked on. He screwed that play up. But one dunk is not enough to make me worry about the guy.

by onlxn on Dec 2, 2008 12:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs