Rumor: Don Nelson and Chris Mullin Battling at Golden State?
ESPN's Chris Broussard reported this morning on First Take that Don Nelson and Chris Mullin are battling and aren't on speaking terms right now. The juiciest tidbit in Broussard's clip is their differing views on Randolph and the young players on this roster. Mullin thinks Randolph's a superstar in the making and the face of the franchise, but Nellie told the rookie to have his agent look into trades. Currently Randolph (Rookie Card) rates as the 23rd best rookie in the association this year according to David Thorpe, Scouts Inc.
J-u-m-p for some thoughts on the drama!
If there's a difference of opinion in player projections between the two, you've got to side with Nellie. Mullin is the GM who brought you such bust picks as Ike Diogu, Chris Taft, Patrick O'Bryant, Kosta Perovic (one of the silliest 2nd round contracts of all time), Marco Belinelli (jury's still out), and Stephane Lasme plus outlandish deals for Adonal Foyle, Derek Fisher, Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy, and Corey Maggette (Robert Rowell?). This is a guy who honestly believed that a front court "core" of Foyle-Murphy-Dunleavy was actually a good idea and wasted a full season of BoomRich-ness. The current D-Leagueness of the Warriors roster is a direct consequence of Mullin's blown picks, silly trades, and contract decisions (Foyle's still on the books this year). Don't forget that Mullin is no stranger to overrating his young "potential". He wouldn't move Diogu (currently a 12th man on the Blazers) to get Ron Artest in his prime. He and Rowell's moves destroyed We Believe.
Nellie on the other hand has a proven track record of scouting and coaching success. He took the Milwaukee Bucks to the conference finals, the Dallas Mavericks from worst to 1st in the West, and saved the Warriors not once, but twice. If Nelson doesn't think a player's good enough to blow up in the NBA, they probably aren't. Nellie doesn't "hate" rookies or young players (see Chris Webber, Tim Hardaway, Mitch Richmond, Monta Ellis, and Andris Biedrins, Josh Howard, and Marquis Daniels). He just doesn't like to give out playing time to players he doesn't think are worth giving playing time to- they either aren't ready or don't have a bright future. My goodness thank you Nellie for not investing playing time in trying to mythically develop the untapped potential of Mullin "finds" like Diogu, POB, and Kosta.
There's no doubt Nellie's a drama queen (a wildly entertaining one at that), but this is indisputably one of the shrewdest basketball minds of all time. His critics constantly harp on his lack of emphasis on D. They obviously didn't watch We Believe. That amazing 16-5 run and upset over the Mavs was heavily due to Nellie's defensive strategies- the gameplans that shut down Yao Ming, Steve Nash, and Dirk Nowitzki that spring were unBELIEVABLE. Give him some players and he'll do some truly amazing things. If he had Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, Shaq, Kobe, Karl Malone, John Stockton, Tim Duncan, or Kevin Garnett he'd have a few rings. But he's hasn't, so he's ringless. I remember Nellie saying last year it takes 3 All-Star players to win it all or 2 all time greats (Shaq and Kobe) to bring home a championship. Mullin hasn't exactly proven to be the guy to get that done.
Check out Nellie's resume on Wikipedia. He's by no means perfect, but no one has done more with less in his NBA coaching career than Nellie. This sorry organization is lucky to have him because coaches and hoops masterminds of his caliber aren't going to be walking down Hegenberger to work for the Warriors anytime soon as long as Chris Cohan owns this team and the unqualified and classless Rowell is heading up the operations.
I see a lot of folks in the local media and in the GSoM community calling for Nellie's head. I just don't get it. Under Mullin the Warriors have had one playoff season over 5 seasons (hey they aren't making the playoffs this year), but people are willing to give Mullin more time and cut ties with Nellie because the team is struggling mightily in one single season through 26 games with an injured and under-talented roster. It seems like folks have an agenda to axe the old man. It's pathetic and unfair. Critics and bandwagoners alike might not remember pre-Nellie, but we do. See The Dirty Dozen: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
This Nellie vs Mullin drama is probably just some media fabricated hysteria to get more viewers. I really doubt this is anything that major. BUT if it really is Nelson vs Mullin who are you siding with and why?
I'll take the coaching legend and hoops mastermind despite his quirks and narcissism (he more than makes up for it with his humor especially on The Don Nelson Show on KNBR) any day over a figure head executive who was handed the job not because of his qualifications or expertise, but because of his name. If this were Chris Smith instead of Chris Mullin he would've got canned years ago- probably never even hired.
Also see GSoM reader kyzah's FanPost: On ESPN First Take: Nellie Tells Randolph's Agent to Seek Trade Options
0 recs |
71 comments
|
Comments
This soap opera just gets
Worse and worse. What’s on the other channels?
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 19, 2008 12:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Can I abstain?
I think they both need to go. Mullin was horse poop until Nellie showed up and Nellie is a crazy dr. frankenstein genius that could destroy the franchise.
by chacabuco on Dec 19, 2008 12:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It all started
when Rowell decided to leave Thunder in China.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/warriors/2008-10-02-thunder-mascot_N.htm
Mullin didn’t like it at all. And it just caused a rift in the front office.
by lightz0ut on Dec 19, 2008 12:37 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Where's the option....
Put a hit out on Cohan and Rowell.
True, Mullins has had some pretty questionable moves (questionable extensions, Maggette, etc), but this team (barring one incredible finish to the season a couple years ago) has been in the toilet since Cohan started fighting with Nelson back in the early 90’s. Whether it be questionable coaching hirings to allowing Garry Saint Jean to control our roster to produce countless 20 win seasons, this is problem that started at the top.
That said, Nelson is trying my patience as a fan. Losing is one thing. Losing while trotting an injured Stack Jack and not giving consistent minutes to our 1st round draft picks from the past 2 years is another. The excuse that they don’t give you the best chance to win is ridiculous. Our vets are getting embarassed on a nightly basis. This will have an affect on them, which will trickle down to the younger players.
by KeepRunnin on Dec 19, 2008 12:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
FUBAR - IF TRUE
Rowell’s in charge, no need to pick between Mullin and Nelson cuz Mullin’s already dead meat
by hardcore on Dec 19, 2008 12:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It’s worth pointing out that Morrow is 19 on that rookie card.
by so ill so d0pe on Dec 19, 2008 12:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No
don’t trade AR. Fire Nelson instead! No more Small Ball, we are not the same team back then.
I will always be your fan JRich. Good Luck
by chili01 on Dec 19, 2008 12:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This is why I've always said DONT FIRE NELLIE
he’s a hall of fame coach!
now, I personally think randolph is going to be a great player in this league. WE SHOULD NOT TRADE HIM. he has the HEART and the DESIRE to win. NONE of those other players besides foyle had any testicular fortitude. randolph is 100% committed and I know he will be a great player.
I look at nellie telling randolph to have his agent start looking at trades as a way to get the kid working hard again. nellie is famous for stuff like that.
as far as chris mullin and nellie not speaking? well chris broussard is a dbag so who knows if what he says is true. i always thought mullin was around practice and stuff, i highly doubt you could run an nba franchise where the gm and coach dont talk.
by HoLdEmUP on Dec 19, 2008 12:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hit or Miss
Both have been hit or miss as far as talent is concerned as of late. Mullie has made some questionable contracts, to be sure, but Nellie has made some questionable use of his available personell. Did ya’ll see that recent peice in the SF Chron about Mike Dunleavy speaking poorly of the organization, saying it’s no coincidince that players thrive once they leave the franchise? He raises an interesting point. Dunleavy is playing lights-out in Indiana, at least he was untill he got hit with injuries. Matt Barnes is blowing up down in Phoenix. Al Harrington is shooting lights-out in NYC with the Knicks. And Pietrus is making Orlando fans very happy with his production at SG, his natural position. Granted, this isn’t across the board, O’Bryant still is loitering on the bench, just for a diferent team, but it still raises some interesting points.
With Barnes and Pietrus, a lot of it has to do with being asked to play the PF position because of a lack of better alternatives / depth. It’s not their game, and it’s going to make their production drop, especially considering the wear and tear of slight-of-frame guys like Barnes banging with PFs, or short guys like Pietrus praying a rebound drops down to their 6’6" airspace. But what about Dunleavy? He complained he was mis-used as well, asked to play the role of a spot-up shooter when he likes to spread the court and facilitate ball movement. Harrington’s problem was similar in nature – Nelson wanted him to wait in a corner and shoot the 3-ball whenever the ball eventually got passed to him every fourth possession – and then griped when Harrington didn’t “hustle” for offensive rebounds, despite the fact that he was out on perimeter duty by design.
Don Nelson is a good coach and has a great mind, but he needs to make better use of his players’ strengths in order to maximize potential. It’s not the square peg’s fault that it doesn’t fit into the round hole. You want Harrigton to realize his potential? Put the ball in his hands and allow him to be an on-the-ball scorer. If you don’t want him to be an on-the-ball scorer, then don’t gripe when you play him in a position where he isn’t comfortable or effective. Nelson expects players to play a certain way, regardless of the talent he has. If he were a great coach rather than a good one (and we’re talking about this year mostly, he has flirted with greatness in the past), he would either adapt to his players’ strengths accordingly, or have his system and play preference so well-known and universally bought into around the organization that players would fit within the system, a la what Sloan has going in Utah. There’s a coach with a $68 million dollar player in Kirilenko, who has AK47 coming off the bench and suppressing his individual skill and abilities in order to mesh in the system and produce wins. For whatever reason as of late, Nelson hasn’t been able to universally instill that mentality within his players, for whatever reason. Maybe it’s a lack of trust in his system amongst players, maybe it’s a lack of motivation coming from Nelson, or maybe Nelson just has punks on his hands. Who knows?
But there’s a real disconnect between the personell and Nellie’s system, even for players who are hearalded as “natural fits” for Nelson’s system, such as a big-man with a 3 shot, Al Harrington, or a high basketball IQ slasher with a sweet shot named Bellinelli, or an athletic big-man who can run, plays with confidence, and has point-forward capabilities in Randolph. If these players can fall out of favor so quickly, who the heck IS the right fit for Nelson, who SHOULD the GM be bringing in? It must be baffling trying to figure that one out. Nelson of late either needs to adapt to the talent he DOES he, or be more assertive in obtaining the talent he WANTS, because right now there’s so much untapped potential and an extremely mis-manged roster with eight or so undersized combo guards. And you’re telling me Randolph’s the problem? Sheesh, what a mess.
by kpg on Dec 19, 2008 12:58 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Mullin was never better than mediocre as a GM. He looked better compared to the morons who were in before him, but they were particularly bad, somehow being right less often than broken clocks.
Nellie is a quality coach and an accomplished talent scout. He’s also got some issues that impede his own success and have kept him from being a true legend. He also appears to be better at building things up than holding things together. He does not seem to care presently and seems to be letting all of his faults present themselves at the same time. He has watched a team implode before with no ability to hold it together. It looks like he could be doing this again.
Rowell is an administrator who probably loves sports, but doesn’t have much of an eye for talent and seems as bad at judging it as the average yahoo fan who sees a 20ppg average and assumes that someone must be a great player accordingly. He has no business being involved in personnel decisions.
The three of them are not on the same page.
The reality is that Mullin should probably go, Nellie should probably go and Rowell should get back to doing whatever he can to get out of the way of another GM/Coach combination (one or two people). It’s a mess. I suspect that there’s some real spite building such that if someone goes, the remaining party will do things counter-productive to winning if only to spite the deceased.
by jae on Dec 19, 2008 12:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Broussard...Lol
This is probably the most relevant comment in this thread:
well chris broussard is a dbag so who knows if what he says is true
I don’t think there is a talking head who spouts more nonsense than this guy. If a real reporter comes out with a similar story, then I will take it more seriously.
by UncleCliffy on Dec 19, 2008 1:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Correction
Nelson WAS a good coach. Now he is a dilusional old man running an outdated system with the wrong personnel to even try it, running our franchise into the ground AGAIN, but I’m sure he’s cool with it because he’s GETTING PAID. Things couldn’t have gone worse for the Warriors in the past 5 months
by Pearlsofwisdom on Dec 19, 2008 1:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Randolph is a star in the making
Fire Don Nelson if it means that we get to keep Randolph and Wright. They clearly have potential and if they got consistent minutes would be excellent in our rotation.
Holy crap, end the drama.
by hv23 on Dec 19, 2008 1:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hey Atma do you even watch the games that this Coach your defending coaches?
He’s been starting consistently almost all season 3 or 4 guards if you count jackson or Magette and I would considering there both pretty terrible rebounders) and a power forward Biedrins yeah sorry he’s not a center at 6’10" and 235. He’s playing some of the dumbest lineups I’ve ever seen!!!! He plays Wright who’s one of the top players in field goal % in the league spot minutes, this coach is a nightmare! Fire him now before he rips out the hearts of the majority of fans by trading the guys we’re most interested in for the FUTURE since it’s all we have to look forward to. By the Future I mean after Jacks, Maggs, and Crawford are gone probably in the year 2013 and we can actually get some rebounding & defense playing players in here that don’t ball hog constantly. I’m siuck of this team and their inability to do anything right when it comes to personel.
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Dec 19, 2008 1:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hey warriorsfiend did you even read this article before posting your comment?
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 1:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, but your comments are stupid if my assumption that you don't watch the games is true.
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Dec 19, 2008 2:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No way better to destroy your credibility than to call the other guy stupid for disagreeing with you.
Mullin is a mediocre gm at best, but far better than his precedessors. At the same time, I cant seehow anybody can trust Nellie. Since CC and RR arent going anywhere, I hope Mullin(first) and Nellie(second) are gone and RR brings a legitiment basketball guy to make the basketball descisions and gives him the power over all basketball moves, including who should be our coach.
What is the status of our petitions to fire Robert Rowell and have Chris Cohan commit Hari Kiri, or at least sell the team?
by warriorsscore110 on Dec 19, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No I simply was calling him out for obviously not watching the games apparent by his
stance on keeping nelson who is coaching horribly.
It's all about the killer cross-over baby!
by warriorsfiend on Dec 19, 2008 2:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
pretty sure its all part fo nellys plan
to get paid and not coach…he wants to be in hawaii, not stuck with rookies that have potential and actually have to work at making them into superstars
by DeepS on Dec 19, 2008 2:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Biedrins not a center?
Because he is 6’10 235?
So Rashard Lewis is also a Power Forward? I mean Rashard is 6’10 like Biedrins but he weighs 230, 5lbs lighter than Biedrins.
Its not a player’s size or stature that determines their position, its their skills and abilities that determines their position. Someone reword that more coherently for me later…
If I am wrong i will respond with a D'Oh
by StephenO4 on Dec 19, 2008 11:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dump Nellie
If he’s deliberately sabotaging players out of spite, he should not be here
by dprodigy19 on Dec 19, 2008 1:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dump Mullin
We suck this year becasue of a bad team put together by Mullin and management, not because of Nelly. Trade AR with Maggette for Boozer!
by rainman120 on Dec 19, 2008 1:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
OH YEAH
The Jazz will realy jump all over that trade, especially with Maggette involved; what team doesn’t want banged up bitch who hogs the ball and jacks up airballs.
"Rosa Parks sat so Martin could walk. Martin walked so Obama could run. Obama ran so we could all fly. Let's get fly."
by marzorg on Dec 19, 2008 3:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nelson has done great things but...
as of right now, he’s destroying this franchise. He’ s frustrated, the players are frustrated, the front office is frustrated, I’m frustrated, you’re frustrated, he’s frustrated, she’s frustrated, HELL! we’re all frustrated! No one in their right minds would think to put 4 guards and one none-true center out on the floor at the same time. Even if someone ever decided to try it, they would eventually realize that it doesn’t work for sh*t and they’d go with a more traditional lineup. We can make all sorts of combinations with this team to find more effectiveness on the court. I honestly thought that with Don Nelson’s ability to create different combinations, that he can somehow make this work but i thought wrong. If rebounding is hurting us, why not try putting Biedrins and Turiaf in at the same time while rotating, Wright,Randolph and occasionally Kurz to get these guys some rest. He continues to hurt this young teams progress. From a players standpoint, you never know when or if you are going to play for Nelson. Random nights, you may find the player at the end of the bench starting and then being pulled out of the game for the rest of the duration. On other nights, you may get 2 minutes of playing time (not even enough time to work up a sweat) and then not be seen for the rest of the night, maybe even for the next 2-3 games. What I hate most is when a player (Wright,Turiaf,Belinelli,Morrow etc.) is playing really well and bringing a lot of energy, then Don Nelson decides to sit him down for an extended amount of time and sometimes they don’t even get back in. He’s depriving his players of their confidence. I’ve seen it happen way too many times. It’s an injustice and I hate it. Now, just hearing that Nelson doesn’t play certain guys (Wright/ Randolph) simply becuase of spite, irks the hell out of me. Nelson is as stubborn as they come and he has way too much power. He has done great things in the past but right now, it doesn’t seem like he gives a flying f*ck about where this team ends up. He’s paid and he has guaranteed money coming to him. He has shown plenty of signs of greed before so this shouldn’t be new to anyone. Now he’s going to give away not 1 but 2 potential superstars in the making. Are people afraid of this guy or something because nobody can’t seem to tell him sh*t!! We as fans need to let our voices and frustrations be heard in order for there to be any sort of action. Every time i watch a live home game, I’m boooooo-ing the sh*t out of old fat as$!
by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 19, 2008 2:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
oh and by the way
you make really great points Atma but i came to a point a long time ago, even during the we believe season and last season, that i was set with my decision. I have plenty of reasons for wanting Don Nelson out of this organization, though it’s not likely it will happen. At least i can vent my frustrations. I know you mention he isn’t perfect, and really no one is but i think Nelson has chances to make things work with what we have but because of his stubborness, he chooses not to. This is the straw that broke the camels back again!!!!!! He’s not playing Wright and Randolph because he’s feuding with Mullin? That is simply childish. He’s depriving these guys of becoming great by not providing them with the proper coaching and consistent playing time. This team is terrible and i still keep wondering why people continue to support this loser! he’s done. He may have done great things but he’s reached his prime (if there is a prime for coaches). He’s actually way past his coaching prime and is already set to retire on the beaches of hawaii. I’m just shocked with how fast this franchise has risen from the depths and even more shocked at how quickly we’ve sunk back all the way to the bottom. It leaves me feeling absolutely disgusted (the most i’ve ever felt while being a warriors fan since i was 6 years old). Pitiful to say the very least.
by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Dec 19, 2008 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dump Mullin....
It’s such a hard thing to say… but if I had to see one go… it would be Mully. I honestly would want to see both stay, as longevity usually brings stability which usually sparks chemistry which means a good team (see Jazz, Utah) but alls well ends well.
by Mr. Monday Night on Dec 19, 2008 2:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
nelly wants to be fired IMO
randolph and ellis are the future baby, i hope mullin never lets them go!
by DeepS on Dec 19, 2008 2:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
and belinelli
I will always be your fan JRich. Good Luck
by chili01 on Dec 19, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mullin’s okay, but no better… I would happily side with the Don Nelson Atma describes. The problem is that we’re not currently getting Good Don Nelson. We’re getting Bad Don Nelson, in all his stubborn, spiteful, lazy glory, and he’s a sight to behold.
Nellie either needs to snap out of this or get going. Doing a terrible coaching job for two months is one thing… trying to engineer the ouster of two of our most promising young players (if the rumors are true) is quite another. That’s potentially franchise-ruining stuff.
I don’t really want to see Nellie go… when his head’s on right, he’s a very good coach, and I do think he’s probably played a part in the improved decision-making on personnel from ‘06 to this summer. But we can’t survive much more Bad Nellie. For that reason, I went with Mullin.
by onlxn on Dec 19, 2008 2:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I Agree...
Mullin has my vote. The “Nelly” Atma described is not the Nelly we’re seeing.
And come on…Taft, Kosta, Lasme = Busts?? When did 2nd round draft picks become such a strong barometer of a GM’s performance? That’s a reach.
You may run like Hayes. but you hit like sh**!
by Orbit1099 on Dec 19, 2008 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2nd round picks as a barometer
It’s just supplemental evidence. No one’s using it as the entire basis for evaluating his poor performance. The worst part about the Kosta move wasn’t the wasted 2nd round pick, it was the silly $3.5 million Mullin pain him (using the midlevel exception) to ride the pine.
His misuse of 1st rounders, questionable trades (Marcus Williams and even adding Jamal Crawford’s salary), inability to use 2 large trade exceptions, and horrible signings/ extensions are what’s done him in.
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why did he trade for Crawford though? Who initiated that?
by belilaugh on Dec 19, 2008 7:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who initiated that?
Al Harrington’s agent?
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 8:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And why was Harrington upset? Why did he want to pack his bags anyway?
by belilaugh on Dec 19, 2008 8:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve said for a long time now that Nellie has always been too hard on Al. I like Al and I wish he could’ve stayed.
But let’s not get it twisted. Al is a below average starter in this league. He’s a terrible finisher around the rim, a poor rebounder, and incredibly streaky. I didn’t mind it during We Believe because he was playing excellent D, but with his mock back injury he had to go.
Now moving Al for Crawford? That’s a Mullin move that created the worst starting defensive backcourt in the league and possibly of all time in Crawford/ Monta Ellis. It also further tied up this team’s salary cap for the foreseeable future to suck.
We’ve been through this before with the Fisher/ Foyle/ Murphy/ Dunleavy contracts. Mullin doesn’t know what he’s doing.
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
crap
I voted for Nellie, I misread it and thought who am I battling against. I want Mullin to stay but Nellie either needs to play Randolph and Brandan or he neeeds to go!!!!
by Ali luvs monta on Dec 19, 2008 2:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mully is the man!
Yeah yeah yeah, he signed a lot of crap. But he did so at a time when the dubs were notorious for letting their OWN players go. Signing those players showed that the warriors were not so cheap as to not pay out the frame for talent. Despite that, he moved all these crap players for good ones in return, brought Nellie back, and managed to get Baron for SPEEDY CLAXTON. He was the only person on the planet who scouted Monta Ellis and he picked up on Biedrins, Azebuke and Randolph. Mully is a great GM. I used to love Nellie as a coach, I think I still do. But the team Rowell has him coaching is not the team Nellie should be coaching. Give Nellie some vets with athleticism and he will make them special because he gives his players a lot of freedom, but on a young, inexperienced team, he is worthless. Let him go, let Smart take over. We need randolph, that kid is going to be something special between his athleticism, skill, and shot blocking ability. If he walks, so do I!
by gmoney423 on Dec 19, 2008 3:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He Would....
Nelson would tell AR’s agent to look for a trade. He screwed the Warriors over with Chris Webber (who btw is getting his number lifted to the rafters this year). Webber made 3 all-star teams since the last time the Warriors have had a single representitive. And here Nelson goes again, not playing players to “get back” at Mullin like a little girl. It shows what Nelson really values: Being Top Dog>Helping the Franchise. And its not like Nellie has had horrible talent, in 2004 he had Nowitski, Nash, Michael Finley, Josh Howard, Antwan Jamison, and Antoine Walker and he still lost in the first round. Coaches like Pat Riley have won with less. I was indecisive on what side to take in this battle, but the idea of trading Randolph makes me for the firing of Nelson.
"Rosa Parks sat so Martin could walk. Martin walked so Obama could run. Obama ran so we could all fly. Let's get fly."
by marzorg on Dec 19, 2008 3:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
nelson is done
i thank don nelson for all he’s done for the franchise, but he is hurting the team now. mullin got my vote in the poll, not because he’s so great, but because nellie is so awful at this point. he has some talented young guys, but refuses to play them consistent minutes. i’m not asking for 35 minutes a game, but why randolph, wright, belinelli, morrow, and maybe kurz can’t get in for a consistent 15 minutes, i just don’t understand. is it really that compelling to play four guards plus andris? must guys like jackson, crawford, maggette be out there 40+ minutes per game? given that they’re 7-19, how much worse could it be to let the young guys get some real game time?
and i haven’t even touched his behind the scenes maneuvering. he’s got that big fat extension protecting him, though, so i assume he’ll be around until they fire him.
by g8tgod on Dec 19, 2008 3:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ranolph not ready yet.
i wouldnt trade him but i wouldnt give him much run yet cause every time he comes in he does more bad than good. in the future he could be good.
by Belinelli's the savior on Dec 19, 2008 3:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
go away nellie
with all due respect, golden state of mind is much better for cheering than any analytical thought. supporting nelson despite his erratic coaching and personnel moves makes no sense.
this team has taken a tremendous step backwards from before and the results are directly attributable to nellie’s coaching. don’t forget you guys are the same folks who complained about trading for BWright who is already putting up great numbers in limited minutes. oh wait, a minute, who’s limiting his minutes again? that’s right, it’s don ‘larry brown crazy’ nelson.
by fulminating on Dec 19, 2008 3:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
this team has taken a tremendous step backwards from before and the results are directly attributable to nellie’s coaching
Really?? I’ll just pretend you were distracted while typing that…
by in for life on Dec 19, 2008 11:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't...
…understand how anybody can defend Nelson at this point. The knowledge that his poor decisions making may be based on a blood fued doesn’t exactly help the team, the organization, or our future. It’s true that Mullin hasn’t always been a great GM, but he’s always clearly worked tirelessly to make this team better. I hope Don Nelson doesn’t get another red cent off this team.
by Zack Vank on Dec 19, 2008 4:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i don't see
how anyone can defend nellie at this point. the original argument is completely biased. u leave out all the positive things mullin has done, and only talk about the stuff that nellie has done in the past. wake up and see that he’s doing a terrible job of coaching this team. small ball works sometimes, but when you don’t have the talent for it (not to mention a few talented big men) then u need to switch it up
by AJC3317 on Dec 19, 2008 5:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
And by the by...
There’s no doubt Nellie’s a drama queen (a wildly entertaining one at that), but this is indisputably one of the shrewdest basketball minds of all time. His critics constantly harp on his lack of emphasis on D. They obviously didn’t watch We Believe. That amazing 16-5 run and upset over the Mavs was heavily due to Nellie’s defensive strategies- the gameplans that shut down Yao Ming, Steve Nash, and Dirk Nowitzki that spring were unBELIEVABLE.
Actually, the Warriors allowed their opponents to score an average of 104 points per game over the course of their 16-5 run. That’s not very good. And even if it were, picking 21 games of Don Nelson’s coaching career (hell, I’ll even throw in all six of those Dallas games) to try to make the case that he’s actually a good defense coach is a little silly. It’s honestly a little unBELIEVABLE to me that anybody would have to mount a case for Nelson being a crappy defensive coach.
Additionally, the framing of this discussion is all wrong. This isn’t a decision wherein you must be for Nelson or for Mullin. Mullin’s made mistakes, and most everyone acknowledges that. But if Nelson is specifically blocking Mullin’s pick in Randolph, and has told Randolph to look for trades because it “isn’t working,” that is insane. It’s completely indefensible. It goes beyond Nelson making judgement calls about what’s best on the court to him making one that I guarantee you no reputable GM would. You don’t watch a nineteen year old do the things Randolph has done in limited minutes, and suggest he start shopping for a new apartment. It implies a lack of interest in the health of the franchise that I find very telling, and very horrifying.
It’s entirely possible to disdain Mullin (as I sometimes do), and loathe management (as I always do), and still realize that Don Nelson is the wrong coach at the wrong time, and he may just rip this whole damn thing to shreds before he leaves. I’m sorry if this seems overly confrontational, but I don’t take kindly to being called “pathetic and unfair.”
by Zack Vank on Dec 19, 2008 7:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Actually, the Warriors allowed their opponents to score an average of 104 points per game over the course of their 16-5 run. That’s not very good.
Points per game allowed is a terrible metric for assessing D. You have to look at possessions, FG%, and turnovers. The Warriors played some amazing defense that spring and it’s a big reason they had all that success.
It’s honestly a little unBELIEVABLE to me that anybody would have to mount a case for Nelson being a crappy defensive coach.
I don’t mean to say he’s an incredible defensive coach, but let’s look at what he’s had to work with. His key players have mostly been poor defenders- Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Chris Mullin, and now- Andris Biedrins and Monta Ellis.
But if Nelson is specifically blocking Mullin’s pick in Randolph, and has told Randolph to look for trades because it "isn’t working," that is insane. It’s completely indefensible. It goes beyond Nelson making judgement calls about what’s best on the court to him making one that I guarantee you no reputable GM would. You don’t watch a nineteen year old do the things Randolph has done in limited minutes, and suggest he start shopping for a new apartment. It implies a lack of interest in the health of the franchise that I find very telling, and very horrifying.
If Nellie sincerely believes that Randolph is going to be a player in this league then why not? We’re not talking about the #1 overall draft pick here (i.e. Chris Webber). We’re talking about a very erratic, mistake prone #14 overall pick.
It’s entirely possible to disdain Mullin (as I sometimes do), and loathe management (as I always do), and still realize that Don Nelson is the wrong coach at the wrong time, and he may just rip this whole damn thing to shreds before he leaves. I’m sorry if this seems overly confrontational, but I don’t take kindly to being called "pathetic and unfair."
Then who’s a better coach right now?
(No offense taken whatsoever- you bring up a lot of good points)
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 9:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
…in all seriousness, I enjoy discussing this stuff with you. Complete respect, I promise you.
The fact that the rumor involves Raymond Felton is very confusing to me. Felton seems at best redundant and at worst an albatross; the Warriors have already made one trade that I viewed as a panicky, “where’d Monta go?” sort of deal in picking up Crawford. If we traded Randolph for Felton, the principle fact that we’d then be left with Monta/Felton/Crawford in the backcourt is confusing to me. It seems utterly pointless. I think Felton is an FA after this year, too, so unless you’re trying to make the playoffs, it seems at it’s core to be a bizarre trade.
Admittedly, Randolph is rather raw, but he’s shown a great deal of energy on defense, shotblocking, and on the boards- all things the Warriors always seem to need more of. He’s literally a teenager (three years younger than me, which is always a shock). And it seems a forgone conclusion that Maggette isn’t going to work out here; even though I haven’t heard your views on him, I’d say it’s been an inauspicious beginning to the second phase of an inauspicious career. Randolph is tailor made to be a matchup nightmare at small forward, Given how little he’s played, and the occasional spectacular nature of his play (again, not denying he’s flubbed some things), it seems insane to me to deal him thirty games into his NBA career.
Your points about defensive metrics are well taken; I may yet try to run the numbers in a more sophisticated way, because what you said about points allowed is certainly true. You likely won’t have to deal with any more bellyaching from me tonight, though, since I’m gonna be leaving to play some hoops on a pitch black basketball court in a few minutes, and I’m quite bad, so I’ll be out there a while.
by Zack Vank on Dec 19, 2008 9:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The fact that the rumor involves Raymond Felton is very confusing to me. Felton seems at best redundant and at worst an albatross; the Warriors have already made one trade that I viewed as a panicky, "where’d Monta go?" sort of deal in picking up Crawford. If we traded Randolph for Felton, the principle fact that we’d then be left with Monta/Felton/Crawford in the backcourt is confusing to me. It seems utterly pointless. I think Felton is an FA after this year, too, so unless you’re trying to make the playoffs, it seems at it’s core to be a bizarre trade.
I have a feeling the trade was more like this: Raymond Felton + Gerald Wallace for Anthony Randolph + Brandan Wright + Corey Maggette
I’d have to think more about that one, but it instantly improves the Warriors hoops IQ, gives them more passers, and significantly upgrades their D. Cap-wise Felton comes off after this season and Wallace’s deal (a better player than Maggette) is shorter by 1 year.
Admittedly, Randolph is rather raw, but he’s shown a great deal of energy on defense, shotblocking, and on the boards- all things the Warriors always seem to need more of. He’s literally a teenager (three years younger than me, which is always a shock). And it seems a forgone conclusion that Maggette isn’t going to work out here; even though I haven’t heard your views on him, I’d say it’s been an inauspicious beginning to the second phase of an inauspicious career. Randolph is tailor made to be a matchup nightmare at small forward, Given how little he’s played, and the occasional spectacular nature of his play (again, not denying he’s flubbed some things), it seems insane to me to deal him thirty games into his NBA career.
I like Randolph, but it’s not like he’s setting the league on fire, despite what his highlights might suggest. He’s ridiculously turnover and mistake prone- look at his summer league stats too- and he’s a perfect example of why young teams don’t win. Nellie hasn’t handed him playing time just because people are whining and that’s good. You have to earn playing time by working hard in practice and minimizing your mistakes. He hasn’t done that yet. Remember he’s a #13 pick. Folks are treating him like he’s a top 3 untouchable pick.
I like Maggette, but I’m not a big fan of that contract. He is what he is at this point in his career. Asking him to morph into even a decent defender and passer is a strange request. Everyone should have been prepared for what they’re getting- a nice injury-prone, flawed, 1 dimensional player.
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 20, 2008 10:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess...
…what I’m really asking for as a fan is a peek. We barely get to see Randolph play, nor do we get to attend practices. I fully understand that he’ll make some mistakes, as I’ve seen him do, and as any kid his age might be prone to. But the reality of the situation, as I think most see it, is that we suck this year. At the apex of our powers, with a healthy Monta Ellis, we’d never be able to play the kind of ball from there on out to make the playoffs this year. So the year is moot. I agree with the concept of basketball meritocracy in a general sense, but given how caustic the situation seems to be right now, I think it’s in the franchise’s best interest to play Randolph and Wright starter’s minutes, and make it clear to them that they will get those minutes regardless of their performance, because we need to know what they can do over the haul of a season. If we do this now, we don’t have to do it later in the midst of a playoff push. This is an opportunity, a silver lining of a terrible year.
by Zack Vank on Dec 20, 2008 12:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not that no one else could win with this roster, it’s that the wrong players are playing. It’s that no matter how well B Wright plays, he doesn’t get consistent burn. It’s that no matter how well a big lineup is playing, Nellie will tighten up and go small if the game is on the line. It’s that the small lineup has not had success, yet we use it a lot. It’s that Marcus Williams has not been given a fair shot whatsoever. It’s that Harrington could have been a much more effective player, but since Nelson only wants him as a 3 point specializing defense stretcher, when things go bad the fans blame him and we end up shipping him out for a player we don’t need. It’s that it is impossible to judge a player (Randolph) based on not even half a season of play. It’s that nothing short of injuries have forced Nelson to change his tendencies. It’s that Nelson’s system may have once been a meritocracy, but now is a dictatorship that rewards Jackson for mistakes that would and have buried Randolph, or even Belinelli before injuries forced Nelson to play him. It’s that veterans understand they do not have to give maximum effort on defense and set a bad example for the younger players. It’s that it is scary having your coach being your biggest wild card and liability. It’s that he should be somewhere else coaching a veteran team, and nowhere near this young team. It’s that I can’t be sure Nelson doesn’t make things personal.
It’s that Nelson is too afraid to try something out of his comfort zone even when the situation calls for it. Case in point: last year, the reason the Warriors fizzled out at the end of the year? Fatigue. What would have helped the fatigue? A longer bench? How do you get a longer bench? You play bench players in the fall instead of riding Baron and Jackson for 40+ minutes a night to develop a bench. You give Wright minutes instead of giving them to Chris Webber. Maybe in a regular year riding the veterans until the end and getting 48 wins would have done it, but it was obvious early into the season that that year was not normal. A coach with championship on his mind would have taken a gamble, would have played his bench more earlier to give his starters rest and develop rotation players for late in the season. If that costs a couple wins, that is a risk you have to take for the sake of ideally having a fresh team come playoff time. Would the Warriors have won even if they got in the playoffs? Hell no, you saw the way they were diving that last month. That was purely from fatigue.
It’s that Nelson’s system, when working at its best, will give you regular season wins if for no other reason then Nelson being a master at gimmicky schemes. But if he plays you in the playoffs and you adjust to his gimmicks he has nothing.
It’s a lot of things, none of them having to do with the Warriors win loss record.
by belilaugh on Dec 19, 2008 7:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
small ball sucks
fire nellie Anthony Randolph could be a cornerstone piece and you want to piss it off for another guard?
by hammer_time on Dec 19, 2008 8:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
PEOPLE STILL LIKE NELSON?
THATS EFFIN RETARDED!
by THIZZ-A-LOT on Dec 19, 2008 8:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
COMMENTS LIKE THIS?
THATS EFFIN RETARDED!
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 8:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
your right, just was pissed off. the life of the warriors fan...
frustrating, my bad
by THIZZ-A-LOT on Dec 19, 2008 9:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
frustrating, my bad
Actually you were right. We went thru this whole scenario the first time nellie was here, the new crowd just doesn’t realize it yet.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 19, 2008 10:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's what I don't get
Just for the sake of argument let’s go with the opposite extreme and say Nellie has been absolutely horrible coaching this season through 27 games. I don’t buy it of course since this is a terrible losing roster saturated with poor defenders, but I’ll play the game.
That still highlights a huge inconsistency here.
- This team was absolutely awful and even more frustrating than this under Mullin’s first 2 years at VP/GM, yet he got to continue. The team is arguably worse now than the team he inherited yet he still has a job.
- Moped Ellis has been a complete disaster this season. 0’s all across the board.
- Andris Biedrins has been a poor defender for nearly 2.5 seasons and has failed to even develop the simplest jump shot which most middle schoolers have.
- Stephen Jackson is one of the league leaders in turnovers.
- Through 18 games Anthony Randolph has averaged more turnovers and fouls than assists, steals, and blocks combined.
- Now in his second season Brandan Wright still has no idea what play the team is running whenever he’s out there.
- Chris Cohan has been one of the worst owners in all of sports for a decade and a half.
Yet no one’s looking to ship them out of town and putting up all these “Fire Nellie!” hysteria.
Why does Nellie get such a short leash and all the blame, especially when he’s far more accomplished in the NBA than all of these other guys? Completely unfair.
Dumping Nellie creates far more problems than it solves. He deserves time to fix this mess. Good things come to those that have patience in Nellie. Just ask the Dallas Mavericks:
1997-98: 16-50
1998-99: 14-36
1999-00: 40-42
2000-01: 53-29
2001-02: 57-25
2002-03: 60-22
2003-04: 52-30
Nellie knows when/ how to tank it and how to build a winner. Believe that.
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 19, 2008 8:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The fact...
…that we have a bad record isn’t the reason I say Nelson has done a terrible job (although it doesn’t help his cause). It’s because we have a bad record and we’re not giving the kind of minutes to our young players that we should. Paying big money to Jackson and Maggette is, at this point, a sunk cost. That is to say, because we’re paying that level of money, there’s a desire to play them into the ground because of how expensive they are. The flaw in that reasoning is that the money is spent either way; barring some breach of contract that would void either of their deals, we’re out booku bucks on these guys. If they aren’t performing well, the smartest possible decision is to play guys who give us a better chance to win regardless of salary.
Now, clearly we see different things when we look at Brandan Wright. You see a guy who is missing his defensive assignments. I see a guy who despite missing some assignments is still doing more good on help defense than some of our vets do (Crawford and Maggette most notably). I see a player who’s physical tools give him some nearly unblockable offensive moves. I see a player who at 21 I think could be posting an efficient 16/7 a night. I see a power forward who could become a dependable 20/10 man within a couple years, provided he gets the game time now. And I’ve seen this player languish on our bench when he is clearly the best true power forward on our roster, in favor of playing Corey Maggette at the four. I’ve seen him post great, “confidence building” games and then never sniff the hardwood the next night. The last time the Warriors chose Nelson over player, Nelson was gone not long after and we didn’t make the playoffs for twelve years. If keeping Wright and Randolph requires us to ditch Nelson, then that’s what I’d prefer to do.
Don Nelson, who always seems to leave a wake of strife behind when he leaves a job. He’s sixty-eight, and one would imagine not interested in rebuilding. He never puts together teams with the kind of defensive prowess I like to see, and while you’re right that we have bad defenders on our team, we shouldn’t have so many effortless defenders. The brand of defense they’ve been playing transcends the question of ability. It’s clear they’re not trying. And as a head coach, when you let a team get away with that, even if it isn’t your fault, you’ve severely compromised your ability to get things back on track.
As for nobody calling for the heads of other figures in Warriors management… we can’t fire an owner. I think basically everybody’s wanted Cohan gone for a decade, it’s just the nature of owning that makes that a slightly more desperate, unlikely, and fruitless battle to wage.
by Zack Vank on Dec 19, 2008 9:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
" * This team was absolutely awful and even more frustrating than this under Mullin’s first 2 years at VP/GM, yet he got to continue. The team is arguably worse now than the team he inherited yet he still has a job."
I’m not saying Mullin is deserving of keeping his job, it’s more like a lesser of two evils thing. I still can’t believe that Maggette signing.
" * Moped Ellis has been a complete disaster this season. 0’s all across the board."
Has nothing to do with the team being put out on the floor. Why call for his head, he is a proven producer when he is out on the court. He made a mistake off the court, and he paid for it financially. That’s done.
" * Andris Biedrins has been a poor defender for nearly 2.5 seasons and has failed to even develop the simplest jump shot which most middle schoolers have."
Yet he continues to be one of the better centers in the league. There is a difference between an unconventional center and a bad one. And I disagree with the bad defense comment. With no exterior defense, he gets challenged all the time, leading to a lot of fouls. If there is better team defense, then we can judge his defensive ability (which I’ve always thought was pretty good.)
" * Stephen Jackson is one of the league leaders in turnovers."
He’s playing terrible. And yet he keeps playing. Usually when a player consistently isn’t producing the coach will bench them. And before you bring it up, I supported his decision to bench Baron last year.
" * Through 18 games Anthony Randolph has averaged more turnovers and fouls than assists, steals, and blocks combined."
I’ll give you that. I don’t really think he should be playing yet. He’s got a lot to work on. But he’s a rookie with unbelievable athleticism, why would anyone call for his head and want to ship him out?
" * Now in his second season Brandan Wright still has no idea what play the team is running whenever he’s out there."
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuulll***************************t. People who defend Nelson look for any reason why he shouldn’t be on the floor. When he is on the floor, he produces. Period. It sure doesn’t look like he’s out of place there, he looks more out of place when he is inexplicably on the bench.
" * Chris Cohan has been one of the worst owners in all of sports for a decade and a half."
Anyone who argues with you there is a “hater.” No doubt about it. Just because Cohan is bad doesn’t mean Nelson can’t be bad at the same time. The difference is that it would be pretty damn hard to get rid of Cohan, much easier to get rid of Nelson.
by belilaugh on Dec 19, 2008 9:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting take
Has nothing to do with the team being put out on the floor. Why call for his head, he is a proven producer when he is out on the court. He made a mistake off the court, and he paid for it financially. That’s done.
Hey at least Nellie and the other guys are out there trying. Why does Nellie have to go when he’s actually showed up this season, rather than this immature liar who has made the franchise look stupid?
Yet he continues to be one of the better centers in the league. There is a difference between an unconventional center and a bad one. And I disagree with the bad defense comment. With no exterior defense, he gets challenged all the time, leading to a lot of fouls. If there is better team defense, then we can judge his defensive ability (which I’ve always thought was pretty good.)
Biedrins still cannot guard a single starting 4 or 5 mano y mano consistently. He’s one of the major reasons we keep seeing career nights from guys like Josh Boone, Marc Gasol, Nene Hilario, Hakim Warrick, Spencer Hawes, Greg Oden’s best game as a pro, Drew Gooden, Andray Blatche, Kendrick Perkins, David Lee (37-21!), and Marcin Gortat.
Yet for some reason Nellie has to go after a 27 game stretch instead of their franchise “cornerstone” who doesn’t seem to be all that interested in improving his D?
I’ll give you that. I don’t really think he should be playing yet. He’s got a lot to work on. But he’s a rookie with unbelievable athleticism, why would anyone call for his head and want to ship him out?
It’s funny how folks act like he’s CWebb or a superstar in the making. If Nellie’s ready to give up on him, chances are he’s probably not an elite NBA player.
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuulll***************************t. People who defend Nelson look for any reason why he shouldn’t be on the floor. When he is on the floor, he produces. Period. It sure doesn’t look like he’s out of place there, he looks more out of place when he is inexplicably on the bench.
I guess that’s how you see it. The guy looks utterly lost to me and looks like he has 0 desire out there.
Anyone who argues with you there is a "hater." No doubt about it. Just because Cohan is bad doesn’t mean Nelson can’t be bad at the same time. The difference is that it would be pretty damn hard to get rid of Cohan, much easier to get rid of Nelson.
All I’m saying is I don’t see all the very necessary “RECALL COHAN” cries and instead the short-sighted “FIRE NELLIE” (what has he done for me lately?) whining from this fanbase and it’s annoying.
Getting rid of Nellie solves nothing. You might get a short term defensive boost, but in the long run it’s going to set off a long, nightmarish playoff drought.
See Lanier, Bob
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 20, 2008 10:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Atma
You make great arguments in favor of Nelson, or at the very least against firing him. You’ve said it all better than I could so I wont’ try to restate it all.. But one thing I don’t understand is why people don’t trust his judgement on young players. Who exactly has he been wrong about ? I mean, I’m as impressed as everyone with the athleticism of Wright and Randolph but we don’t see these guys in practice every day and their limitations have already been well-documentd. Rushing them out onto the court isn’t going to make the team any better right now…
Anyway, thanks for the hi IQ content here. I’m really getting annoyed with all the low brow shouting and lowest-common-denominator attacks… This whole Fire Nelson movement is equally as offensive and mindless as all the ‘bandwagon’ fans that jumped in a couple years ago. In fact, its an anti-bandwagon…
by in for life on Dec 20, 2008 12:08 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Can't vote both?
seriously, is there any way to fire mullin , nelson and rowell? what about moving the warriors to Iraq?
“BAGDAH WARRIORS” sounds nice
=Gaucho=
by Gaucho! on Dec 20, 2008 9:28 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mullin and Nelson
For the most part, Nellie tried in Dallas to surround himself with people who bought into his system. With one major exception—the crazy high school kid—he drafted players he could work with. It seems to me that if Nellie and Mullin have trouble, it is over the kind of players Mullin has provided him with. I don’t know who is responsible for what, but the draft choices don’t look much like Nellie. GSW fans seem to think Wright and Randolph are major stars and it is the crime of the century they aren’t playing. I doubt that. It’s really obvious Randolph can’t control his emotions on the court and makes a lot of bad decisions. He is very young and inexperienced. If I couldn’t work with him, I would trade him because he’s going to be awhile developing. As for Wright, who knows? Seems to have more of a game this year but whether it’s a game that fits what the Ws are trying to do is anyone’s guess. What management has done is hire a 68-year-old coach and give him less and less to work with each year. Someone should compare a list of personel moves by Mullin and Nelson in the last 10 years. Did Mullin trade for Nash, the guy who became MVP twice? Did Mullin trade that fat guy for Dirk? Did Mullin draft Josh Howard? Devin Harris? Give me a break. We are in the grips of losing hysteria and all the facts have been thrown out the window. Nellie is a smart basketball man. You are lucky to have him. He seems to be one of the few sane people in the gym.
by Marques8 on Dec 20, 2008 10:04 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Someone should compare a list of personel moves by Mullin and Nelson in the last 10 years. Did Mullin trade for Nash, the guy who became MVP twice? Did Mullin trade that fat guy for Dirk? Did Mullin draft Josh Howard? Devin Harris? Give me a break.
No doubt. Even if you go back to his first tenure with the Dubs and his Bucks days I’m sure you can dig up far superior talent decisions from Nellie vs Mullin’s run here.
The best things Mullin has done during his tenure are:
1. Trade Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis for Baron Davis
2. Draft Andris Biedrins with the #11 overall pick
3. Draft Monta Ellis in the 2nd round
1 was unquestionably a brilliant move, although a LOT of Warriors fans didn’t think so during the 2005-2006 season under Monty.
2 was a grade A-move, but let’s not forget that he passed on Al Jefferson, Josh Smith, and Kevin Martin.
3 was one of the greatest second round picks of all time, but let’s be real there’s a huge amount of luck involved here. If Mullin truly believed Ellis would be so great (he’s on the record saying he’s surprised Monta blew up to these levels), he would’ve selected him ahead of his lottery bust that year Ike Diogu (untouchable for Artest? WHY?).
Check out Grading the Mullin Picks from last spring.
by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 20, 2008 10:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not about Mullin or Nellie indiviudally, but about the team.......
Atma,
You come strong, but let’s try and be objective here. There are several factors why the “Fire Nellie” chants are going on:
The first is the “What Have You Done For Me Lately?” crowd. The Warriors have looked horrible this year and their record reflects their play this season. It is the opinion of several fans on the Warriors Usenet group that Nellie is NOT adjusting his game plans to his personnel and keeps playing small ball even when the Warriors are getting pounded on the boards.
The second factor is that most fans knew the Warriors would be hard pressed to duplicate the success of the last two seasons (playoffs and then 48 wins). There’s no Baron and Monta gets into an accident. Even if Monta was healthy, there was no guarantee the team would do well.
Knowing the team will struggle a bit, lots of fans want to see the younger players play. We know what Magette, Sjax, Kelenna, etc can do. Ok, folks can argue that younger players have to earn their playing time. However, for me personally, I’d like to see what some of the young guys can do. I’m not saying feed them 48 minutes of game time, but some consistent minutes would be nice.
The third factor is the unstable structure at the top of the Warriors management chain. The reason folks are getting hard on Nellie is because they feel that NELLIE has undercut Mullin and not Rowell. I fear that we may never know the true answer. One can look at it many ways. Rowell may not have been happy and decided to get Mullin out of the picture. Rowell may have asked Nellie for advice. Nellie may have told Rowell to get rid of Mullin.
This really has little to do with Nellie’s past history and more to do with the here and now.
by coach41 on Dec 21, 2008 9:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















