Sure!
We’re starting to get some kind of chemistry goin,which would be bad to break up…but really though, it couldn’t make us any worse ha ha

BD I LOVE YOUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

look at what the clippers linup would be-
1-jamal, mike, jordon
2-thorton, jordon
3-maggette, thorton
4-zach, camby, paul davis
5-cayman, camby, deandre

plus that would give the clippers a real player that can come off the bench and play in eric.

honestly i think this trade would really benifit both teams. barons not meshing with that style, or coach, or team, while jamal and maggs preferr the half court style, and it would relive the warriors of 2 players that we never really had room for.

so then it will be

1-baron, monta, belinelli
2-monta, belinelli, azibukie, stack jack
3-stephen jackson, azibukie, belinelli
4-brandan, randolph, ronnie
5-andris, ronnie, brandan

honestly it makes both teams better. i just hope our stupid owner/president could take this trade. cause were practicly paying the same for maggs and baron, exept maggs missed more games, and baron makes our team better. and we just geek a salary dump with jamal.

baron for: Maggs + Williams + Watson

we’d have:

1: Baron – Crawford/Bellineli
2: Ellis – Crawford/Bellineli
3: Jackson – Buki/Morrow
4: Wright – Randolph/Turiaf
5: Beans – Turiaf/Randolph

wow, i really hope this happens!!! i hope this ‘rumor’ is true!

BTW…Tony.psd….make a “Bring B.D. Back” movement logo…i wanna make a shirt! and signs!

if we could somehow get odom too…OMG! odom starting at the 4…we’d be nasssty

need to give Crawford for this trade to work. Jamal cannot be a bench guy, and we need to give the clips back a pg. our line up would work like this anyways
1: BD CJ
2: Monta Belinelli Morrow
3: Jackson Buke Morrow
4: Wright Turiaf Randolph
5: Beans Turiaf. Kurz?
Thats what we need!
and at least the clips would get talent in return and Crawford would work better in the clips offense anyways.

cause first off, dunleavy isnt a fan of maggs, and they would need a starting level pg to get in return.

anyways its better for us, we already haave to make room for jack, monta, bukie, and belinelli, where would crawford fit?, expecially if we get baron back, so no really, wed need to give up crawford.

to use for this to happen. although i used up all my mulligans with God the year we got into the playoffs.

cuz that’s just mean.

if BD and Jax want to play together, what if Jax got traded to the Clips? Haha imagine Dunleavy handling both Jax and BD.

I’d give up anyone of our backups guards… Morrow, Watson, Williams; although i’d figure that they’d want a PG and Williams seems to be the most attractive to survive a Mike Dunleavy Sr. structured system… since it will cater to his strengths and would have him play similar to his college game. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN!

Nice when like 20 interesting posts are deleted ‘cos the posters couldn’t figure out which of the seven “BD to the Bay?” diaries to post in. I chose the one that seemed to have the most action; I chose … unwisely. Is there no way to merge threads?

Brief recap … assuming BD and Jack are pining for a reunion, here was my cockamamie alternate scheme: Maggs and Jack to LAC for Chris Kaman and the expirings of Brian Skinner and Ricky Davis (or equiv.)

They get better in the short term and add a couple of charismatic highish-profile “stars” to draw the LA glitterati; we squash smallball once and for all, hand the creating/playmaking keys to Moped Ellis, and get longer, stronger and more efficient overall.

Them:
1 BD
2 Jack/Gordon
3 Maggs/Thornton
4 Z-Bo
5 Camby

Us:
1 Monta
2 Azubuike (or Morrow or Craw or Beli — whoever wins the job)
3 Wright/Randolph
4 Biedrins
5 Kaman/Turiaf

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=109045640047

‘bring b.d back movement’ facebook group