B. Diddy Wants Back In? [Inside the Warriors] Let's do it!

B. Diddy Wants Back In? [Inside the Warriors]
Let's do it!

6 months ago Atma Brother ONE Comment 46 comments 4 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

OH EM GEE

dooo eeettt!

by Dr. Orpheus on Dec 28, 2008 10:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

depends on what we give up

but if we could get it done for maggs + williams then hell yes i’d do it

by AJC3317 on Dec 28, 2008 10:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

yeah exactly

BD/Craw/CJ
Monta/Belli/Morrow
Capn/KAz
Wright/Rudolf
Biens/Ronny T/Kurz

BD coming back brings back the on-court leadership, which IMO is what we are missing the most. Can even have marco run point to relieve baron on ball distribution

by Dr. Orpheus on Dec 28, 2008 11:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Wouldn't marco be bd's backup?

And CJ would backup monta, since the two are becoming somewhat similar plays (fast, nice mid range jumpers).

Anyways, pipe dream.

by mosdl on Dec 28, 2008 11:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Hell Send them Crawford

somehow too

Do it!

by SFzig on Dec 28, 2008 11:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

NOOO

more like, send em CJ!

put crawford back where he belongs, at the 2…so backup monta

run

baron/bellinelli
monta/crawford/morrow
jackson/buki
wright/randolph/turiaf
beans/turiaf

omg i hope this happens

baron for maggs + williams + watson

omg plz

by DeepS on Dec 29, 2008 12:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Gotta Keep CJ thats Jacksons son

Uh this is a response to no, he called morrow his son

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/17/SPRS1465MU.DTL

Within weeks of coming to the Warriors, Morrow had earned the nickname "Little Jack" because he reminded people of Stephen Jackson, whom he resembles from a distance. (In college, he went by A-Mo.) Jackson welcomed the comparison and decided to quasi-adopt the rookie.

"I always like the underdog," Jackson said. "I root for them in movies. I root for them in sports. … Players who make it when they’re not drafted, I love their attitudes. Last year, I said C.J Watson was my son. Now, he’s got a brother."

Trade a 2nd round pick instead of Watson because at this point Watson has been playing better than the last 3 second rounders
CJ>Kosta
CJ>Lasme
Hendrix wasn’t given a chance, but a PF waived on a team that needs a fearless bigman; that says something about him.
CJ is better than the last 3 2nd round draft pick therefore he will probably be better than next year’s 2nd round draft pick. That was Inductive reasoning right?

Baron For Mags, Williams, And a 2nd round draft pick.

If I am wrong i will respond with a D'Oh

by StephenO4 on Dec 29, 2008 11:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

why watson?

That guy is good.

by GSW Fan on Jan 7, 2009 8:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Never happening

Sadly, that would require two teams to admit to doing something wrong. Which I highly doubt they would do.

Though BD backed up by marco/cj would be nice.

by mosdl on Dec 28, 2008 11:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

screw it, if they go through with it...

i forgive them

by Dr. Orpheus on Dec 28, 2008 11:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Sure!
We’re starting to get some kind of chemistry goin,which would be bad to break up…but really though, it couldn’t make us any worse ha ha

BD I LOVE YOUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by jimmycaps on Dec 28, 2008 11:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

check it

look at what the clippers linup would be-
1-jamal, mike, jordon
2-thorton, jordon
3-maggette, thorton
4-zach, camby, paul davis
5-cayman, camby, deandre

plus that would give the clippers a real player that can come off the bench and play in eric.

honestly i think this trade would really benifit both teams. barons not meshing with that style, or coach, or team, while jamal and maggs preferr the half court style, and it would relive the warriors of 2 players that we never really had room for.

so then it will be

1-baron, monta, belinelli
2-monta, belinelli, azibukie, stack jack
3-stephen jackson, azibukie, belinelli
4-brandan, randolph, ronnie
5-andris, ronnie, brandan

honestly it makes both teams better. i just hope our stupid owner/president could take this trade. cause were practicly paying the same for maggs and baron, exept maggs missed more games, and baron makes our team better. and we just geek a salary dump with jamal.

by gswfan1 on Dec 28, 2008 11:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

hahah

what if we somehow we incorporated zach randolph into the trade. hes got a bad personality, but the dude puts up some numbers 22 PPG and 11 RPG. wed have a pretty solid 12 man rotation:

Baron / Watson
Ellis / Belinelli / Morrow
Jackson / Azubuike / A. Randolph
Z. Randolph / Wright
Biedrins / Turiaf

but that would never happen because there would be some salary problems. oh well…

When Maggette missed those consecutive shots in a span of a humming bird’s flap,
Crawford simply looked at the bench and said, "Are you serious?"

by gorillas on Dec 28, 2008 11:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Give them Crawford too

and take another garbage time player

that should do it

I will always be your fan JRich. Good Luck

by chili01 on Dec 28, 2008 11:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

make it happen cap'n

by disguy on Dec 28, 2008 11:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

+1

i second that. i want this to happen like CRAZY!!!

Ya, 'cus Trix are for kids!

by BayWarrior on Dec 28, 2008 11:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

If Baron

commits to this new Smart+Moncrief defensive approach, and if Baron commits to staying in shape (Jenny Craig?!?), and if Baron shows a little more responsibility (remember that birthday party thing late last season?), then +10000 I want him back!

by IQofaWarrior on Dec 29, 2008 12:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

IMO best possible trade for us would be:

baron for: Maggs + Williams + Watson

we’d have:

1: Baron – Crawford/Bellineli
2: Ellis – Crawford/Bellineli
3: Jackson – Buki/Morrow
4: Wright – Randolph/Turiaf
5: Beans – Turiaf/Randolph

wow, i really hope this happens!!! i hope this ‘rumor’ is true!

BTW…Tony.psd….make a “Bring B.D. Back” movement logo…i wanna make a shirt! and signs!

by DeepS on Dec 29, 2008 12:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

Also

if we could somehow get odom too…OMG! odom starting at the 4…we’d be nasssty

by DeepS on Dec 29, 2008 12:43 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

We

need to give Crawford for this trade to work. Jamal cannot be a bench guy, and we need to give the clips back a pg. our line up would work like this anyways
1: BD CJ
2: Monta Belinelli Morrow
3: Jackson Buke Morrow
4: Wright Turiaf Randolph
5: Beans Turiaf. Kurz?
Thats what we need!
and at least the clips would get talent in return and Crawford would work better in the clips offense anyways.

So I don't have a signature well these words would do! Who knew that upgrades can have downgrades too!

by 24k state fan since 87 on Dec 29, 2008 12:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

cj + williams + maggs isnt enough?

by DeepS on Dec 29, 2008 1:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

just

think if you were a team would you want that?

So I don't have a signature well these words would do! Who knew that upgrades can have downgrades too!

by 24k state fan since 87 on Dec 29, 2008 5:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

So basically

we’d have the same exact lineup as last season except without Harrington and plus Turiaf and some rookies?

Is that good?

by Calamity on Dec 29, 2008 1:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

well

we got a good belinelli and wright now.

So I don't have a signature well these words would do! Who knew that upgrades can have downgrades too!

by 24k state fan since 87 on Dec 29, 2008 5:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

our rookies

are better than they were last season…so nelly can actually play them and give people rest and not burn them out like last season

by DeepS on Dec 29, 2008 11:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

no they arnt

cause first off, dunleavy isnt a fan of maggs, and they would need a starting level pg to get in return.

anyways its better for us, we already haave to make room for jack, monta, bukie, and belinelli, where would crawford fit?, expecially if we get baron back, so no really, wed need to give up crawford.

by gswfan1 on Dec 29, 2008 1:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

im putting my filipino voodoo/christianity novenas

to use for this to happen. although i used up all my mulligans with God the year we got into the playoffs.

warriors dont fish they hunt!

by VonteegoCummings on Dec 29, 2008 2:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

don't get my hopes up

cuz that’s just mean.

by Run Dubz on Dec 29, 2008 10:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

+1

But being a Warriors fan for so long, aren’t you used to getting your hopes and dreams shot down just as quick as the Warriors bring them up? haha

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 29, 2008 10:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

one other thought

if BD and Jax want to play together, what if Jax got traded to the Clips? Haha imagine Dunleavy handling both Jax and BD.

by Fantasy Junkie on Dec 29, 2008 10:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

Sjax running set plays?

That would be fun to watch – the tanking of the clips. BD/Sjax simply are fast/small/nellie ball type players.

by mosdl on Dec 29, 2008 12:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

IMHO...

Crawfish > Maggs. Maggette is too into the half court offense that he’s been so used to with the Clippers. But Crawford can run if he wanted to. So what if we’ve lost so many games with him, but if we had such a prolific scorer come off the bench as a sixth man, we’d do AWESOME. But knowing Nellie, if this trade went though of Baron for Maggs/Williams, he’d probably have a lineup that looked like this…

Baron
Monta
Crawford
Jackson
Biedrins

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 29, 2008 10:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

P.S.

I know that on the Clippers side, the Clippers would want Maggs back, but do you guys really think that Rowell would really go through with this?Doubt it..

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 29, 2008 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

He’s got too big of an ego to admit that he was wrong in letting go of Baron in the first place.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 29, 2008 10:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

lol

that lineup looks so bad…no D

id rather do

baron
monta
jackson
wright
beans

and have crawford come off the bench for the 1/2 spot

by DeepS on Dec 29, 2008 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

I would rather have that lineup too. But remember, NELLIE is our coach. He will play small ball til the day he retires.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 29, 2008 1:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

I'll take it in a heartbeat...

I’d give up anyone of our backups guards… Morrow, Watson, Williams; although i’d figure that they’d want a PG and Williams seems to be the most attractive to survive a Mike Dunleavy Sr. structured system… since it will cater to his strengths and would have him play similar to his college game. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN!

by Mr. Monday Night on Dec 29, 2008 12:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

Hahahaha. What a joke. Hilarious.

by 003MorrowNeverDies on Dec 29, 2008 1:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

Ugh.

Nice when like 20 interesting posts are deleted ‘cos the posters couldn’t figure out which of the seven “BD to the Bay?” diaries to post in. I chose the one that seemed to have the most action; I chose … unwisely. Is there no way to merge threads?

Brief recap … assuming BD and Jack are pining for a reunion, here was my cockamamie alternate scheme: Maggs and Jack to LAC for Chris Kaman and the expirings of Brian Skinner and Ricky Davis (or equiv.)

They get better in the short term and add a couple of charismatic highish-profile “stars” to draw the LA glitterati; we squash smallball once and for all, hand the creating/playmaking keys to Moped Ellis, and get longer, stronger and more efficient overall.

Them:
1 BD
2 Jack/Gordon
3 Maggs/Thornton
4 Z-Bo
5 Camby

Us:
1 Monta
2 Azubuike (or Morrow or Craw or Beli — whoever wins the job)
3 Wright/Randolph
4 Biedrins
5 Kaman/Turiaf

OBAMA AMABO

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 29, 2008 3:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

Is there no way to merge threads?

Sadly no, but if that happens again and one of your comments is hidden just drop us a line and we’ll send it back to you. I’ll look into this issue and see if we can build in some kind of consolidation/ merge threads feature. Sorry about that.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 29, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Thanks, man.

I appreciate it. Happy Holidays! :-)

OBAMA AMABO

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 29, 2008 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Nice when like 20 interesting posts are deleted ‘cos the posters couldn’t figure out which of the seven "BD to the Bay?" diaries to post in.

That’s why it’s fashionable to be late, give the riff-raff time to be kicked out.
1 Monta
2 Azubuike (or Morrow or Craw or Beli — whoever wins the job)
3 Wright/Randolph
4 Biedrins
5 Kaman/Turiaf

Can Kayman shoot? otherwise 2/3 of your team couldn’t hit a basket from more than 5 feet from the rim?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 29, 2008 6:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs