Warriors Enjoyment Guide
This won't be the most popular post on the site, but I thought I'd share a few of the things that have kept me a die-hard Warriors fan for over twenty years.
The Warriors do not play to win, they play to wow. Now I know that many of you wish we had the San Antonio Spurs here--a terrific professional mistake-free franchise that plays hoops the way my father and grandfather remember. But instead we have the Harlem Globetrotters. Nellieball is exciting because it features super-athletic, extremely fast, flashy players who can think on their feet and excel at fast breaks. Even in Nelson's interregnum in the 90's the Warriors remained one of the most exciting franchises to watch because they didn't lose their style.
Here's where you say: Style doesn't win games! I agree. But here's where we may differ: Winning games has never been the top priority of the Golden State Warriors. Putting on a great show and putting paying customers in the seats is what any pro sports team is about. We are not winning wars at all costs here. This is entertainment. And in a world of thirty teams each trying to differentiate themselves and keep the home fans excited, the Warriors do a better job than almost any franchise of any sport.
Yes, we keep losing and hardly ever see the playoffs. That's fine. The playoffs are for the likes of Jerry Sloan and Kobe Bryant, ultra-competitors I'd never want to get trapped in an elevator with. I was a soccer player up till high school. Then the super competitive monsters kept popping veins in their necks at our lack of fire and missed assignments and I just quit. With a**holes like that around I wasn't enjoying myself any more.
Now what makes the Warriors special is that other teams are eager to play us. They have a very good chance of winning, it's true, but more to the point they get a license to ill when they come to Oakland. Everyone, including the psychotically competitive, love showing up and having a run n' gun streetball fiesta every few weeks. And we, the lucky fans, get to invite the greatest hoops players from all over the world to Oaktown to put on the best show in the country.
How else to explain it? When you have Jax, Mags, Crawford, Monta, and Biedrins as your starting five you're not working toward a trophy, you're working toward a highlight reel--and contrary to common wisdom, which is that winning puts fans in the seats--we have learned that a feel-good highlight reel is what keeps us paying the increasingly expensive tickets.
So sit back, relax, and enjoy the ride. When another team executes a pretty play and dunks on us I cheer just about as loud as when the Dubs do it. And when we beat all expectations and break every lily-white heart in Dallas against all odds it just makes the story all the sweeter. But don't expect this crew to compete against teams designed to win the championship. And accept that if the NBA only held teams that played basketball "the right way" as Larry Brown likes to sniff, this league would be a hell of a lot more boring. If you want to cheer on the Warriors for the next twenty years, learn to enjoy what you got. If you just HAVE to cheer on a winner, because you're an ultra-competitive a**hole yourself, then root for KG, because he is a god among men.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
Are you calling every fan
that has expectations of winning an A-hole?
KG was not a “winner” until he got 2 all-stars (potential HOF’s) to play with him by the way.
I hope you don’t find the team fun to watch when they lose badly to teams like the Wiz and the Grizz.
by misterjennings on Dec 4, 2008 10:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
his logic seems to be...
IF you are an ultra-competitive a-hole, THEN you have to root for a winner. I don’t think he means to call all Warrior fans who expect to win a-holes. Masochists might be a better term for that. :-)
by exl on Dec 4, 2008 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
pretty weak analysis
I doubt you’ve been watching much, cuz this year’s team isn’t fun at all. They are borderline unwatchable. Run TMC was fun. We Believe was fun.
by J Canseco on Dec 4, 2008 10:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i agree
sometimes this team just HURTS to watch
“stephen jackson inbounds” (OH GAWD)
by alandoeezy on Dec 4, 2008 11:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, style can fill the majority of the seats at Oracle, but WINNING will give us sell out crowds every night. Which means that in a business sense, it is better to win, since you’ll receive more revenue because of it.
WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...
by JustSomeName on Dec 4, 2008 10:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
true, but...
I think many people will agree that the current ownership/management is incapable of building/maintaining a winning team on a consistent basis… so they go for the next best method of lining their pockets with your money.
by exl on Dec 4, 2008 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am speechless.
That was DOO DOO!!!
by nuttinbutnet on Dec 4, 2008 12:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Even though they lose a lot, Warriors are a fun team to watch.
But would you trade fun for winning? WInning like the boring ass spurs?..
by AlbinoWhale on Dec 4, 2008 2:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Winning and Fun
I’d trade for fun or winning, but I’d say that winning is fun. The average fan can watch the Warriors and consider them a fun team because they’ll put up points and they allow a lot of points.
by Rated-R Superstar on Dec 4, 2008 2:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The average fan can watch the Warriors and consider them a fun team because they’ll put up points and they allow a lot of points.
You mean the average fan of the other teams?
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 4, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Average Fan
Yes, the average fan of other teams or just someone that watches basketball and doesn’t support a particular team.
by Rated-R Superstar on Dec 5, 2008 7:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
im not voting on this poll because
anguish isn’t an option.
by HoLdEmUP on Dec 4, 2008 4:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
And this is why....
This is why Cohan and Rowell can get away with putting a subpar product on the court. Because people put up with it being FUN, that is absurd. I love the Dubs but I want them not to be a laughing stock, we are headed back to the lottery and that sucks. Also how fun is it to watch this team consistently make boneheaded plays. I am saying this but I also get league pass and watch all my Dubs games…..
by DubsfaninAZ on Dec 4, 2008 4:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This is just like the difference between watching the Warriors and the Sharks
Would you rather watch the monotony of a predictable Sharks win or the excitement of an up and down never-know-what-will-happen Warriors’ loss?
(How many of you can honestly tell me you have watched an entire Sharks’ game from start to finish without switching channels? I am quite convinced it is not humanly possible.)
by sharpshooter on Dec 4, 2008 6:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I am quite convinced it is not humanly possible.
It’s not even possible to watch a whole quarter( assuming they have quarters?)
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 4, 2008 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They have periods.
You know, like women … :-O
OBAMA AMABO
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 5, 2008 4:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
like women
But not as interesting.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 5, 2008 9:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not by a l-o-n-g shot.
Indeed, the group defined by “is more interesting than hockey” and “is less interesting than women” includes … like, everything on planet earth.
OBAMA AMABO
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 5, 2008 10:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
By the way, Skeptic...
I’m now just three posts away from GSoM post #4,000. What are you getting me?
OBAMA AMABO
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 5, 2008 10:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What are you getting me?
Ice hockey tickets.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 5, 2008 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
You enjoy watching the Dubs because you don’t care if they win. A “long time” fan such as you wouldn’t mind if the Clippers beat us. If I were watching, I’d be hurting at the notion that we’d be getting beat by the Clippers. Watching such a game would be painful, NOT fun.
Ellis to the RIM!
Monta for the win?! YES!
by XIAOXIAO on Dec 4, 2008 8:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
watching and being a fan is fun. winning makes it funner.
by oGwarrior on Dec 4, 2008 9:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















