Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Battle-lg

I admittedly don't follow hockey one bit. (I hear the San Jose Dolphins- I mean Sharks are good though!) The NHL is an absolutely barbaric league that gets a pass for its thuggery because of the racial makeup of both its players and fans in stark contrast to the unfairly targeted and criminalized NBA. BUT even to a hockey hater such as myself new SBN ice blog Battle of California looks really fun. Also shout out to San Jose Sharks blog Fear the Fin. They're just off the tank!

11 months ago Atma-160_tiny Atma Brother ONE 219 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

“The NHL is an absolutely barbaric league that gets a pass for its thuggery because of the racial makeup of both its players and fans in stark contrast to the unfairly targeted and criminalized NBA.”

Nice, you get four stars for ignorance. The reason players like Ron Artest, Stephen Jackson of Old and Chris Anderson get a bad rap is because of the color of their skin not the content of their character. I agree hockey is boring as all hell, but give me a call the next time Gretzgy fires a gun off outside of a strip club and doesn’t get into trouble for it, and i’ll give you the touche on this one. But until then, whats the point of blindly pulling the race card? None.

by ekkodesigns on Dec 9, 2008 5:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Seriously

how can you say you don’t follow hockey, but then call it a barbaric league in the next sentence?
horrible.
You know nothing about the game yet think because of the color of the majority of the player’s skin they don’t get in trouble? ridiculous.
Maybe you don’t know this, but in hockey, it’s absolutely okay to level someone on the boards.

That’s downright racist on your part.
Shame on you.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 9, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's barbaric

Nightly in the NHL nightly there’s some bloody fist fight on the ice and the fans in the stands just keep cheering it on. It’s considered “just part of the game”. Melo and lil’ Nate get into a little slap fight (violence in the NBA incredibly rare unlike the NHL- less than 0.1% of the games at best) and the whole NBA is considered filled with thugs. I would venture to say that if NHL was predominantly Black or filled with more people of color, it would be criminalized and the mainstream media/ corporate fanbase would constantly try to remind us how much thuggery is part of the game. Seems like downright racism in my book.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 9, 2008 9:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

They are thugs. Read ekkodesign’s post, you don’t see NHL players running around at odd times of the night while illegally possessing handguns and shooting them in the air outside strip clubs. You don’t see hockey players jumping in the stands to go pounce on some fan that was trash talking him. The violence in hockey is part of the game. How can you say it isn’t when you “don’t follow hockey one bit?” You can’t. It grew up with the game. Like the hard hits in the NFL, it’s just part of the game. Don’t say it isn’t, because you don’t know that.
You, Atma, are the racist; and you’ve done it before.
I’d also like Earl Sleek to comment on this, if he see’s it.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 9, 2008 11:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, I have a lot of trouble playing theoretical guessing games like “if they were black”. Yes, things would be incredibly different, and that’s a shame, but it’s tough to say much more than that.

Hockey being a hitting sport and race perception being a regrettable phenomenon really don’t seem related to me.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 9, 2008 11:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Please explain

I never understood why fighting is an acceptable part of hockey. I understand the hard hits are part of hockey as they are in football. But outright fighting? I’m not sure I see the point in fighting and how it gives one team an advantage over the other. It confuses me but perhaps you can please explain?

by Fantasy Junkie on Dec 9, 2008 11:47 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

It’s cultural more than anything. There’s (in theory) a code among fighters — protect their teammates, stand up to the opponent’s champ, whatever — but these days it’s more a crowd-pleaser more than anything.

Sure, teams play well after a good fight by their guy — I’ve seen it plenty — and it is somewhat a deterrent from harassing a team’s superstar, but you’re right. Games get won outside of fighting — doesn’t necessarily mean it needs to go away, though.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 9, 2008 11:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is it necessary?

Seems like in every other sport, fighting is not a necessary aspect of the game. In fact, it’s heavily punished.

So why is hockey any different than those other sports?

Just because it’s cultural means it’s okay or accepted?

If it went away, would the sport be affected? If so, other than fan appeal, how would it be affected?

by Fantasy Junkie on Dec 10, 2008 12:03 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Necessary might be too strong a term. It is likely, though — just with the confines of big bodies on a closed in rink all with the speed of skates — generally there’s a natural-ish lead in to a fight.

The sport could exist without fights, sure, but it’d take a while to get used to.

European hockey, best I understand, is a sport that largely exists without fights. The complaints generally about its play (and its players) is that the hitting aspect is lacking — things may get a bit too cute. I’m of course way over-generalizing, but it does exist. And eventually, I suppose the NHL will go that way. I’m just hoping it’s after I’m dead — I still love fights on skates, probably because it’s something I know I cannot do.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 12:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cultural means two different things if it is black or white

Dogfighting, supposedly part of black culture according to the MIke Vick media (though I’m pretty sure that started out as a white thing), is destructive and savage.

Fighting, part of white hockey culture, is glorified and part of a “hockey code”.

I guess protecting your people and standing up for your honor in the “street code” is bad but doing it in the “hockey code” is good.

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 10:05 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Which brings up another double standard...

Joe sixpack bloodily chomping away on his cage-raised hormone-fed cows and pigs while acting shocked, SHOCKED at the horrific barbarism of Vick’s dogfighting.

Yup, we’re a pretty irrational, inconsistent, and hypocritical species…

OBAMA AMABO

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 10, 2008 10:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I don’t see the connection, but dogfighting and hockey fights are two completely different situations- one is between two willing humans, while the other is between animals that are forced into the situation.

Fear The Fin: Where the second round is overrated.

by Mr. Plank on Dec 10, 2008 3:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How about the difference between the reception of Sarah Palin enjoying moosehunting and Michael Vick engaging in dogfighting?

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 3:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But now you’re talking about perceptions of race in general. I’m not saying racism doesn’t exist in our society (it most definitely does); I just don’t see how relating hockey fights to race relations is applicable and/or acceptable.

This isn’t an attack on you, mind- I just have no idea why this was brought up in this way (a fanshot nonetheless).

Fear The Fin: Where the second round is overrated.

by Mr. Plank on Dec 10, 2008 4:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

True, it did not address race in sports, but my point is that if double standards can exist in society in general, why would sports be some sheltered section where racism or double standards are not allowed?

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 4:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If you care to respond, follow me at the bottom of the thread- words get too squished and ugly once it’s indented this far :)

Fear The Fin: Where the second round is overrated.

by Mr. Plank on Dec 10, 2008 5:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t see hockey players jumping in the stands to go pounce on some fan that was trash talking him.

New York, 1979. Apparently incensed over heckling and insults from rabid New York Rangers fans after a 4-3 Boston Bruins victory, Bruins players climbed into the stands to duke it out with their vociferous antagonists in this 1979 melee in Madison Square Garden.

Strangely enough, in both this case and the Auburn Hills Melee, I was kinda rooting for the players…

OBAMA AMABO

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 10, 2008 4:27 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You know

I could’ve sworn that something like this happened recently as well in the NHL. Say past 10 years?

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 9:14 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing I can really think of (though admittedly, I’m not an encyclopedia) was when a Philly fan fell through the glass into the penalty box with the Maple Leafs’ Tie Domi and they exchanged punches (Domi handily won, of course).

I think that was more than ten years ago, but right around that time.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 9:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it says something that you have to look that far back to find examples of it…

by Bleys on Dec 10, 2008 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As Skip T noted

4 fights last night in the NHL. 0 in the NBA.

The evidence seems to demonstrate (don’t know hockey well enough- so let me know if I’m wrong) that fan/ player brawls like the 1979 hockey melee and the Pistons-Pacers Palace brawl are oddities that only happen every few decades.

At least to me what makes the NHL barbaric and what illustrates this double standard which race plays a big role in creating is the astounding discrepancy in the nightly fight counts.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

its not race, its the game

Fights in hockey aren’t s serious and allow two people who have been banging heads to let off some steam, fights in hockey rarely if ever result in energy, it’s all about the pads and trying to keep your balance on skates. However a fight in BB can do some serious damage.

by qin on Dec 10, 2008 6:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"You, Atma, are the racist; and you’ve done it before."

Sorry man I think you’re confusing things. This is exposing racism (something you’ve done in the comments section before). Not being racist. Confusing the two is just silly.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 9:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wrong again

your personal thoughts are being portrayed here, racist ones.
And i’ve exploited you for it too, pre-SB days.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

There was a case of a hockey player going into the stands and punching a fan while he was in the penalty box. So…..

by Number22Drew on Dec 10, 2008 9:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? How’d the player get over the glass?

I don’t recall it, but ten years ago isn’t my forte, necessarily.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 9:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They are thugs. Read ekkodesign’s post, you don’t see NHL players running around at odd times of the night while illegally possessing handguns and shooting them in the air outside strip clubs.

Way to stereotype the entire league. I would venture to say that the exact events you are describing have happened once or twice in the NBA this entire decade. That makes the entire league thugs and deserving of criminalization when they get into a little pushing match with an opposing player while NHL players can break someone’s nose with their bare knuckles? Don’t think so.

You’re probably referring to Stephen Jackson too, which is odd coming from a Warriors fan who should know more than anyone how much good that man has done for his community since then. If he’s a “thug” in your book, then you haven’t been paying attention.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 7:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I sterotyped the NHL

They do NOT do that. I never mentioned the NBA in that paragraph. And I am referring to SJax, so? I’m well aware that he has improved his behavior and conduct after joining the Warriors. However, that does not erase what he did. He was a “thug,” plain and simple. And this simple fact is not getting through your head — fighting in hockey is not just some street fight. It’s been implemented in the league and ok’ed in the league. Hockey players fight because of the many reasons that have been mentioned many times in this thread already. It’s part of the sport. Get that through your thick and biased head. It’s part of the sport, so it’s okay. Therefore, they are not thugs. Some basketball players like being thugs because they like to think they’re tough. Like Melo bitchslapping little Nate. It’s comical. Is it part of the sport? No, it is not.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 11:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL It's barbaric

says the guy who “admittedly don’t follow hockey one bit.”

by qin on Dec 10, 2008 6:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The culture of the game encourages hard hits to a degree where the intent to injure is not far off

Todd Bertuzzi’s violent take down of Steve Moore, resulting in the 3 fractured vertebrae and a concussion for Moore is completely unlike anything I’ve ever seen in basketball (Kermit Washington’s punch is the only thing even remotely comparable in its effect, but that happened in the context of a brawl, not during play). Marty McSorley’s hit on Donald Brasher is equally sickening. Let us not forget both of Chris Simon’s incidents in 2007, one for slamming his stick into the side of Ryan Hollweg’s head following a clean hit and another in which he stomped his skate onto the leg of Jarkko Ruutu. Suspensions of 25 and 30 games respectively were assessed for these actions, similar to the penalty the NBA gave Carmelo for a slap.

Despite all this (and these are only the most notable of incidents, we could go on and on about dangerous, unnecessary hits along the boards) many of the NHL’s fans (I’m generalizing, but I feel relatively confident doing so) glorify the toughness and violence in the game. Attend or watch a game and when a fight breaks out (there were 4 fights tonight, December 9th alone) and the fans will cheer as loudly as they do when a goal is scored.

Tell me this isn’t a blatant double standard and I’ll show you a person who is being actively ignorant.

by SkipT on Dec 9, 2008 10:30 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Props to SkipT

SkipT’s also blatantly wiser than me in this arena- probably in general too!

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 9, 2008 11:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tell me this isn’t a blatant double standard and I’ll show you a person who is being actively ignorant.

Dude, we root for sports teams. That in itself is actively ignorant.

Besides, I’m not one to equate the Bertuzzi incident with 4 nightly fights—that’s a very rough generalization. I feel like I can be for one and against another without losing much sleep.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 9, 2008 11:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But the Bertuzzi incident is a product of the game's enforcer culture

Bertuzzi’s actions were in retaliation for a hit by Moore, ruled legal by the NHL, a month earlier on on the Canucks’ captain Markus Näslund which sidelined him for a couple of games. Even though Moore fought a member of the Canucks early in the game, Bertuzzi was trying to provoke him the third before hitting him from behind and driving his head into the ice.

I don’t for a second think Bertuzzi, as cowardly and disgusting as what he did was, was making an effort to end Moore’s career. However, he is hardly the only player in the NHL who feels that is necessary to “send a message” to other players and protect their own team physically. This is exactly what drives all the fights in the NHL, a silly, barbaric and clearly dangerous effort for players to police the game themselves.

The MLB doesn’t allow pitchers to throw at players anymore for retaliation by encouraging and giving umpires the authority to immediately eject pitchers believed to be intentionally throwing at opponents. The NBA very clearly takes a strong stand fighting. The NFL protects QB’s from late and dangerous hits with significant fines and suspensions.

Whats different about the NHL? For whatever reason, the “entertainment value” (I’d rather just watch the hockey) outweighs the safety of the players to an extent. In the aftermath of Bertuzzi’s attack, the NHL fined the Canucks 250k for “…failure to prevent the atmosphere that may have led to [the incident].” To me, the league is admitting that they too have a responsibility here, for more or less turning a blind eye to this enforcer behavior, which when escalated, can clearly become incredibly dangerous. Fights in the NHL and both a symptom and a cause of a greater issue facing the NHL. I would far and away prefer that they instead focus on selling the skill of the game (and maybe obtaining a decent national TV contract would be nice touch too).

by SkipT on Dec 10, 2008 2:59 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree completely with your assessment, however that doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy hockey. If anything, it just means you can enjoy hockey with some perspective. Watch some playoff overtime hockey, it is the most intense thing you will ever see. The only time in any sport where any team could win or lose the entire season instantaneously.

by belilaugh on Dec 9, 2008 5:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

yeah

trust me, i’m no hockey fan. i don’t think i could name 5 NHL players. seriously.

but i watched the sharks play in that quadruple (or whatever it was) overtime game in the playoffs last year and i went nuts. that was some exciting stuff, i have to admit. if you like sports, odds are you just like watching competitive things like me, and things don’t get a whole lot more competitive than playoff hockey, because a single goal is a game-changer and is seemingly always 5 seconds away!

by Run Dubz on Dec 9, 2008 6:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Playoff hockey is really spectacularly intense to watch

for sure.

Too bad mah Blues haven’t been there since the lockout…=[

Monta! Montaye! Montae!

by Baked Biedrins on Dec 9, 2008 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

a single goal is a game-changer and is seemingly always 5 seconds away!

   But a very boring 5 seconds. I think the problem is they are too spread out on the ice court and they are wearing skates and padding which makes it hard to connect with the action. We’ve all played a little basketball so we know what’s going on but unless you live in minnesota hockey is kinda foreign.
   Atma, Don’t sweat the “barbarianism” , it’s put in to please the crowd, much like pro " wrestling". If the hockey league din’t want it they would control it.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 9, 2008 6:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the shout-out, although your feelings on hockey mirror mine on basketball. I think I saw a game three years ago?

Still, we can probably agree on one thing — us Californians sure can be a-holes sometimes. Have fun bouncin’ that ball around!

— Earl from the BoC

Oh yeah, and take it from this Ducks fan — the Sharks are very, very good this year.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 9, 2008 6:44 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Atma...

I find it very ironic that you complain about the stereotypes of the NBA and YET you go on and stereotype hockey as being “barbaric”.

Talk about double standards…

by R I O T on Dec 9, 2008 7:45 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

R I O T

See the double standard in my comment above.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 9, 2008 9:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you remember when Carmelo Anthony, some other Nuggets, and the Knicks got into that fight? Anthony got suspended, it was on ESPN, the Nuggets had to trade for Iverson to keep their season alive? If you remember that, well, exactly.

In a perfect world I’d be willing to bet Atma would sound more consistent in his views to someone like you, because he would probably dismiss both acts (that and a typical hockey fight) equally. But in today’s world one gets a lot of publicity, one gets none and is encouraged, so when he is talking about, he needs to be one-sided or his point will be ignored. Of course, there are always the people that are so quick to dismiss his point, but think about it. You don’t see any double standards in media coverage of the two sports?

by belilaugh on Dec 9, 2008 11:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m confused by the use of the term “double standard” — are you saying there should be one standard to apply to these separate sports? They barely resemble each other at all.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 9, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You seem like a rational guy, so I will try and explain it to you

The question is not if the cultures of the two sports resemble each other, because they “barely resemble each other at all”, the question is why they do not?

Why is fighting in hockey just a “part of the game?” The actual game of hockey involves putting a puck in a goal using a high level of skill. I don’t see where fighting is necessary to do that. Basketball involves putting a ball in a goal using a high level of skill. I don’t see where fighting is necessary to do that.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I am not simultaneously condoning basketball fights while condemning hockey fights. In a perfect world, I would be able to voice my disapproval of both. However, all too often a critique of the NBA ends up being a critique of an entire race, while a critique of the NHL ends up being the critique of an individual. I find it funny that during the Warriors playoff run of 2007, there were all kinds of people calling Matt Barnes a thug. But wouldn’t he be a perfect teammate in hockey (assuming he didn’t suck ass, which he probably does)? Always has his teammate’s back, goes right at the champ, defends his team’s honor, etc.? Sure he gets a couple flagrant fouls, but how is that different from some of the penalties that some hockey players get? Why is the term thug applied to Matt Barnes and not them? The acts that occur are exactly the same, yet one is seen as a thug. This is what I mean by double standard. In the NBA you can be clean as possible, and still get labeled a thug. I heard the term applied to Baron as well.

Condemning an NBA fight, though some may not be influenced by it, is condemning an entire race in today’s society. It is unfair that hockey gets a free pass while this goes on. Do I blame hockey for that? No, I blame the media coverage.

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 10:27 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, I see what you’re saying (and if it’s not clear — I have no idea what goes on in the NBA at all, so I’m largely ignorant on half this discussion). I just don’t really understand why it’s important to say “fighting is necessary” — it’s not necessary, just like dribbling’s probably not really necessary for basketball — you could play a sport without either mechanism, and it would simply be a different sport. Why they’ve stayed in either sport? Probably because we’re used to it.

I call tons of NHL players “thug” all the time, btw — you’re right, it carries a different connotation entirely in hockey. But I dunno, the differences we’re talking about just seem like differences in the development of the sports themselves.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 10:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s good that you have perspective, but most people simply do not share that. Most people see a thug in the NHL as a tough guy, or an enforcer, or whatever, as opposed to the gangstas, thugs, ghetto activity, hood culture, etc prevalent in the NBA. I think the fact that you understand that and still argue on the side of hockey clouds your assessment of the situation, however. To you, there is not a lot of racial bias because you personally do not see it as such, but just because you personally have that perspective doesn’t mean the majority of the public have that same view.

But again, my question is why the sports are developing the way they do? In its purest form, hockey does not involve fighting, and basketball does not either. Why has hockey developed fighting, and why has it been so accepted? Though basketball has not developed fighting, why is it that everytime a fight breaks out it is front page news?

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 12:47 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

That's very silly

First image that pops up on a Google Image search for “hockey fight”:

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 13, 2008 5:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Brilliant
I find it funny that during the Warriors playoff run of 2007, there were all kinds of people calling Matt Barnes a thug. But wouldn’t he be a perfect teammate in hockey (assuming he didn’t suck ass, which he probably does)? Always has his teammate’s back, goes right at the champ, defends his team’s honor, etc.? Sure he gets a couple flagrant fouls, but how is that different from some of the penalties that some hockey players get? Why is the term thug applied to Matt Barnes and not them? The acts that occur are exactly the same, yet one is seen as a thug. This is what I mean by double standard. In the NBA you can be clean as possible, and still get labeled a thug. I heard the term applied to Baron as well.

That was probably one of my favorite subplots of the We Believe run in 07. Haters were calling the Warriors players and fans in Oakland thugs. But we showed them what it was all about. We weren’t thugs. We just happy and passionate as hell. And it didn’t take any violence to prove it.

Remember our “blog-battle” with The Association? Good times.

Man things used to be so genuinely exciting here in Dubs land. I’m a sucka for the golden age.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 10:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This blog post was like sloppy seconds.

by stimpasaur on Dec 9, 2008 9:31 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

what if...

a hockey game broke out in the middle of a boxing match? which would you complain about THEN?

by TheWarrior on Dec 10, 2008 12:09 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

a hockey game broke out in the middle of a boxing match? which would you complain about THEN?

Ha ha, as much as this is a pretty funny joke, TheWarrior brings up a really good point. I think it’s more about the rules of the sport. Football would be considered barbaric under most standards, but its the rules of the sport.

Now Atma is right about the fact that there are some ridiculously barbaric things that happen in hockey that are completely uncalled for. As there is in baseball (thrown baseball into the stands), football (cleat stomp on the face) and any other sport under the sun.

But i just don’t like trying to boil it down to a race thing, when certain players have fully earned their reputation. Packman Jones is Packman Jones no matter what race he is. You don’t see white american baseball heroes getting off scott free for their steroid scandals.

I’m just saying lets call it what it is, no need to pull the race card. Its a blameshifting cop-out.

by ekkodesigns on Dec 10, 2008 1:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry my friend

It has everything to do with race in how the NBA and NHL are portrayed, marketed, etc. It’s about “entertainment value” when a predominantly white group of athletes routinely rough house, but “thuggery” when once or twice an ENTIRE season when the mostly black athletes in the NBA get into a silly little playground pushing fight.

But i just don’t like trying to boil it down to a race thing, when certain players have fully earned their reputation. Packman Jones is Packman Jones no matter what race he is. You don’t see white american baseball heroes getting off scott free for their steroid scandals.

That’s an entirely different issue. We’re not talking about illegal drug and substance usage and abuse. We’re talking about different standards and rules for the amount and degree of physical violence.
 
I’m not pulling some card, just telling it like it is.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 9:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It has everything to do with race in how the NBA and NHL are portrayed,

 I’ll have to agree, hockey makes white people look awfully stupid. NBA players get along much better with the other team, they seem a lot more intelligent.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 10, 2008 9:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll have to agree, hockey makes white people look awfully stupid.

Because they play a sport where there’s hitting and fighting? I dunno — I’m hesitant to judge anyone’s intelligence based on their physical skills.

Race is definitely an issue in America, but I feel compelled to point out that there are some mean on-ice fighters in George Laraque and Donald Brashear, both black, and a superstar in Jarome Iginla. If there were lots more of those specific players in the NHL, I still think that hockey would be generally the same sport as it is today — those guys are practically saints off the ice.

Also, don’t forget that the NHL just handed out a six-game suspension to Sean Avery for saying “sloppy seconds” in front of a microphone. Just curious — what would that get in the NBA? Say what you will about the on-ice violence, the NHL has done very well in keeping its nose clean off the ice, and I think that matters.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 10:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Very odd
Also, don’t forget that the NHL just handed out a six-game suspension to Sean Avery for saying "sloppy seconds" in front of a microphone. Just curious — what would that get in the NBA? Say what you will about the on-ice violence, the NHL has done very well in keeping its nose clean off the ice, and I think that matters.

He got 6 games for that? I don’t think he should get any games for that dumb comment. Just a nice long talk with his team’s PR folks.

But I don’t see why we should give a league props for suspending a guy for mouthing off a dumb liner, but allowing and even to some extent marketing nightly bloody fist fights on the ice. The sloppy seconds line was stupid, but the amount of violence in the NHL is barbaric. The double standard in the coverage of the common violence in the NHL compared to the miniscule violence in the NBA is deeply rooted in racism. Seems pretty clear to me.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 10:18 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

See this is where you don't understand hockey

Avery was going to play that night against the same player who he just called his girlfriend “sloppy seconds”. The NHL avoided an elevated incident by suspending Avery two hours after he made that comment. Had he played that night, I guarantee you that there would’ve been some ugly incident.

Hockey is barbaric. But the very nature of the sport is violence. You’ve got very large humans strapped to blades that make it so they can go 30 mph plus and then encourage running into each other head on or smashing them into the boards. As a matter of fact if you don’t take the body in hockey you’re considered soft. Even stars like Crosby and Ovechkin hammer people these days.

All that being said, hockey has toned down its violence a lot over the past 20 years. There used to be bench clearing brawls and yes, players going into the stands. The 70s were crazy. A lot of those images resonate in people’s minds still. Hockey is really a ballet of choreographed beauty and brutality when executed at its best.

Fighting was allowed back in the day because it was a way to allow coaches and players to police the ice. If you notice, fighting is almost always a one-on-one experience, two guys dropping the gloves throwing some haymakers and then sitting in the box for five minutes. I’m not the biggest fan of the fighting aspect of the sport, but it is something that many hockey fans love and I don’t see the issue with letting two guys drop the gloves and go at it like a boxing match.

I think part of the difference of what you see in basketball and hockey is that in recent history, hockey fights consist of two guys squaring off and everyone else backing off and letting it happen. In basketball when it happens, you see it spill over to multiple players where chaos seems to ensue. I don’t see a racist thing about this. I just think one sport has a legacy of fighting and being a violent sport by its very nature and one doesn’t. So when one sport has a bench clearing brawl that includes a slap fight and a lot of chaos, it’s going to get coverage.

Oh and I wouldn’t call basketball players thugs. Maybe allowing the odd one on one square off would make it a little more entertaining ;-)

by Tyler Bleszinski on Dec 10, 2008 4:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

First of all major props to my man Blez. He’s a hockey fan to the core and I just dissed his game. I’m thankful he didn’t take a hockey stick straight to my throat. Hey you know how those barbaric hockey players do it! I kid. I kid.

Seriously though Blez- good thoughts on the background and history of the game. Your point about one-on-one vs bench clearing brawls (which are excessively punished in the NBA now- just ask the Suns) is very intriguing and something that definitely has to be considered.

I think part of the difference of what you see in basketball and hockey is that in recent history, hockey fights consist of two guys squaring off and everyone else backing off and letting it happen. In basketball when it happens, you see it spill over to multiple players where chaos seems to ensue. I don’t see a racist thing about this. I just think one sport has a legacy of fighting and being a violent sport by its very nature and one doesn’t. So when one sport has a bench clearing brawl that includes a slap fight and a lot of chaos, it’s going to get coverage.

But here’s my key point. The NBA does have that rough and violent past in the 90’s- nothing to the degree in today’s toned down NHL as you noted though. The common complaint from the media and the casual fan all through the 90’s was that it was too violent and dirty. However, unlike the NHL (a predominantly white league) the NBA couldn’t market rough-housing from mostly big Black athletes to mainstream America. David Stern’s no fool- he knew that and turned into a softie league where superstars get ALL the calls and it’s not that hard to get a suspension or get thrown out of a game for being rough.

I don’t think that it’s any coincidence that a league that was branded as being “too Black” in the 70’s was rescued by the Bird-Magic rivalry in the 80’s. Bird is undoubtedly one of the greatest to ever play (not just a shooter- look at his amazing rebounding totals), but we’d be kidding ourselves if we didn’t recognize that his skin tone played a big role in resurrecting and “cleaning up” the NBA’s image.

It’s a mistake for us to ignore the racial elements that dictate what’s acceptable and okay by the rules in these two sports because of their player makeup. I’m also positing that the NBA could never get alway with legalized one-on-one fighting not just because it’s a bold new rule to institute, but because two dark skinned guys going at it makes the majority of this country scream “ghetto” in fear.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 6:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I buy that

Someone else mentioned this, but Donald Brashear and Georges Laraque are both dark skinned and have squared off in hockey before.

I’m guessing I would buy more of a class argument here over the racial argument. Hockey is typically a sport of privilege (not in all cases – the Devils’ John Madden grew up in a pretty bad situation and still played) simply because it costs so much for the equipment and ice time. Basketball, on the other hand, is a sport that can be played at any playground in any place in America. All you need is the ball.

Now perhaps there might be a touch of race in this, but hockey certainly doesn’t get much love from the mainstream media at all. I mean, how often do you really see hockey highlights at all any more? Hockey’s been relegated to niche sport at best, below things like MMA and NASCAR. If your argument was true and there was overt racism favoring hockey over basketball, wouldn’t hockey be receiving much more coverage on ESPN and the local news outlets? Instead it’s relegated to being the little kid in the corner that only seems to get attention when Marty McSorley slaps someone in the skull with his stick or Todd Bertuzzi buries Steve Moore’s face in the ice.

The point is, I think because we love our respective sports, we see it very differently. I feel like the jilted hockey lover when it comes to getting good coverage. Maybe it’s being overly sensitive about the lack of good coverage of the sport, but I really see a beautiful thing out there on the ice. It’s also why I created Athletics Nation because I felt like the A’s were being ignored. I imagine you’re pretty sensitive to the coverage of your favorite sport as well and when you feel like people are looking for the “thugs” and “criminals” in your sport. I mean, I hardly heard squat about hockey this year on ESPN and yet the Avery thing was everywhere.

The good news is that with the NHL Network out there, I get all the hockey coverage I want from people who love the sport like I do. I imagine you might be getting the same thing from NBA TV.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Dec 10, 2008 8:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If your argument was true and there was overt racism favoring hockey over basketball, wouldn’t hockey be receiving much more coverage on ESPN and the local news outlets? Instead it’s relegated to being the little kid in the corner that only seems to get attention when Marty McSorley slaps someone in the skull with his stick or Todd Bertuzzi buries Steve Moore’s face in the ice.

I think it’s COVERT racism which leads people to use cultural arguments about why fighting is acceptable in one sport and not in another when it’s mostly a product of the racist attitudes, beliefs, and double standards in this country.

The NHL’s minimal coverage compared to the NBA was never my or other’s point- it’s the TYPE of coverage and why one sport can get away with frequent violent displays and the other can’t.

I mean let’s face it. It’s really simple: hoops > hockey (just kidding)

No doubt about it though. I respect your passion for the NHL and the A’s (LET’s GO OAKLAND!) though Blez.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 6:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Like I said I think it goes back to the roots

Hockey is violent by its very nature. Basketball is much more of a gentleman’s sport. I mean fouls are plentiful for any kind of body contact. So yes, it comes across as striking when two basketball players go at it. There is no other violence in that sport.

Hockey lives on giant men hitting each other at 30 mph plus. I think it comes down to the nature of the sports, not some underlying attitude of racism.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Dec 11, 2008 6:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But the roots are informed by past and current racism in this country

That’s why there’s a double standard. We’ve demonstrated the violent and rough-housing past in hoops, but commissioner David Stern has been “forced to clean up the game.” Go out onto the blacktops and even look back at the 90’s NBA- it’s not a softie gentleman’s sport like you’re making it out to be.

No one’s saying that hockey isn’t violent. No one’s saying that hockey players aren’t tough. No one’s saying that the NHL or its fanbase are inherently racist.

At least what I’m saying is that these historical roots and current acceptability of these two sports are informed by racial attitudes and prejudices.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 12, 2008 6:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Because they play a sport where there’s hitting and fighting?

  Yeah, how smart is that? NBA players compete hard without fighting,they show a genuine respect and love for one another, tell me that’s dumb?
   If it’s not the players then it’s the game that is stupid. Maybe they think it will lose fans if they tone it down? Maybe they should lose those fans that like the theatrics and make a better game of it? or maybe like tractor pulls and swampbuggy races it’s a match made in heaven?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 10, 2008 10:46 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

NBA players compete hard without fighting,they show a genuine respect and love for one another, tell me that’s dumb?

I’m not saying it’s dumb, I’m not saying it’s smart. It’s a feature of the sport they play.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 10:53 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

dang I was gonna say that

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 10, 2008 3:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ur an idiot

flat out. Why would u even state an ignorant ass post like this in a Warriors forum. I mean my boy J-Rich was about to play hockey, before tha NBA. So not jus white people watch tha NHL and like hockey. And if I hope that none of these cats who get mad see u at a Warrior game, because they might have have to take a 5 min major. Haha my hockey people know wat that is.

I love 2 tell tha truth, but I'm such a Good Liar

by JRichIsStillAGodButBiedrinsIsABeast on Dec 10, 2008 7:03 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

And if I hope that none of these cats who get mad see u at a Warrior game, because they might have have to take a 5 min major. Haha my hockey people know wat that is

.
Seems pretty barbaric to me.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 9:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No one ever said just white people watch hockey. That’s irrelevant. The actual game of hockey is not racist, and that’s not what Atma is saying (at least I’m pretty sure, I don’t want to put words in his mouth). The perception of hockey in comparison to other sports, especially ones with a high percentage of black athletes, is what is unfair and sometimes (hell, most of the time) racist.

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 10:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Very true

I used to think street hockey was crazy fun back in elementary school. It has nothing to do with the actual games. It has to do with the racial makeup of these two leagues, the media’s oftentimes racist agenda against the black and other colored athletes, and the existing and further cultivated “household” perceptions of the normalcy of thuggery vs toughness.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 10:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right.

the media’s racist agenda against blacks in hockey.
right.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 12:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously?

Hockey = bad because of fighting?

So you don’t ever watch UFC, Boxing, Wrestling or any sort of martial arts?

Atma, you always gotta put a whiney, negative spin on EVERYTHING you write. Which is a shame because all the other moderators are generally positive and would at least support our local sports teams. San Jose Dolphins? They’re the only Bay Area team worth giving two sh*ts about these days.

Instead of making this post about hockey blogs, you had to turn it around and make sure everyone in the community knew how YOU felt about the sport as if anyone cared. Maybe a different moderator with a smaller ego would have been better served writing this entry?

What you wrote perfectly sums up a general ignorance in America: “I don’t know anything about this topic, but let me formulate an opinion and misinform everyone through it.” Write whatever you want, but most of us like reading informed opinions over generalized, half-hearted guesses.

Sorry for the attacks, but I’m still butt hurt over the JRich trade.

www.jettisonhigh.com

by BALLINelli on Dec 10, 2008 9:06 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I love Hockey

I played it as a kid. I watch it now. In fact i say hockey is one of the best live sports to watch. I don’t think it’s barbaric but i could do without the fighting. not my styel. But Hockey itself is a great sport.

i don’t see the racism in the sport either, just lack of diversity but in due time that will change and you can’t expect it if only certain countries on this planet have the capabilities and WEATHER to play it haha.

by YaoButtaMing on Dec 10, 2008 10:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting
i don’t see the racism in the sport either, just lack of diversity but in due time that will change and you can’t expect it if only certain countries on this planet have the capabilities and WEATHER to play it haha.

I’m not sure exactly what you’re saying here. Are you saying that if hockey had more diversity (i.e. more Black players) and basketball had more diversity (i.e. more White players) there wouldn’t be this double standard in the portrayal of thuggery and criminalization? That seems like an argument supporting the notion that there is indeed racist hypocrisy here.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 10:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good thoughts- hopefully it will continue

Props especially to Earl Sleek, Fantasy Junkie, belilaugh, Sleepy Freud, Number22Drew, Skip T, ekkodesigns.

It’s not important whether we all agree, but it is important that we have a constructive, meaningful discussion. I’m learning from all your insights here.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 10:12 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

"It is important that we have a constructive, meaningful discussion"

That’s exactly it. The comments that suggest that this post has some unnecessarily opinionated language are being silly. This is a place for opinions and this is a place for discussion. When one helps facilitate the other, you’re doing exactly your job.

by SkipT on Dec 10, 2008 1:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Constructive, meaningful discussion? Are you joking?

Not sure when you started writing for this blog, but it was a definite step backwards. And that is coming from a 30+ year Warriors fan.

by pj48 on Dec 10, 2008 1:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"started writing"?

I co-founded it before it was even GSoM. That’s well over 3 years. Oddly enough folks have the audacity to try to censor me and others from expressing and discussing what we see and think when they don’t agree.

For the most part there has been constructive, meaningful discussion in these comments which I appreciate. There’s a few of the usual suspects who simply can’t or don’t read, but other than that some good stuff.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 1:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely not joking

There has been thoughtful clarification and explanation of different viewpoints belonging to the various posters. I for one I have enjoyed reading the different perspectives.

by SkipT on Dec 10, 2008 2:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think there’s any doubt that basketball players get a bad rap because they’re predominantly black, and hockey probably gets a little too much credit (it always makes me cringe when people talk about how polite hockey players are compared to the other major sports), but I think the difference between the two sports is that fighting is expected in hockey and it’s not in basketball. A guy fighting in basketball is as unexpected in basketball as dunking would be in hockey, so people react violently to it. I think society has shown that they’re OK with violence as long as there’s a semblance of normalcy to it; people have seen hockey fights enough to know that it’s normal and there’s no real danger there. That’s missing in basketball fights.

Also, basketball fights are always embarrassing. Hockey players grab each others’ jerseys and punch each other in the face; basketball players flail their limbs in a comical fashion or set land speed records backing up after landing a punch (Carmelo).

Thanks for the shout out, man; despite your team handicap (Trevor Ariza is my homeboy), I appreciate your vigor.

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 10, 2008 10:20 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is sad...

By starting your article saying you don’t follow hockey at all, you already admit you’re ignorant to the topic before you even say anything. How can you expect to get your point across?

Longtime Ducks fan here, been playing hockey since I was 8. Admittedly, on my horribly crappy bronze league team, I am the skill player. I’m the all-star gamer. I’m all skill, and I barely play the physical game. So here’s a scenario for you. Here’s me, annoying the piss out of the other team by making their d-men look like swiss, so one of their guys starts slashing up my legs any chance he gets. He gets a penalty, still does more. Actually purposefully runs me knee to knee contact. Barely any calls. So what do I do? Next time he pins me on the boards, I unload straight to his face, and flops on the ice like an idiot. We both get a penalty (his interference, mine roughing). Doesn’t bother me the rest of the game. Now, if I hadn’t done that, he keeps slashing me, there’s your higher chance of injury.

Rec leagues don’t have enforcers, so you have to stand for yourself. But what if the guy who is doing such things is 50 more lbs than you? That’s why guys like my man George Parros have contracts in the NHL. The refs won’t catch everything. He’s there to equalize that, and yes, every once in awhile two guys will drop gloves to fight for momentum. It’s part of hockey. It’s been so since before the NBA even existed. Cheap-shot artists like Avery (and sometimes Pronger, admittedly) need someone to hold them in check.

By the way, something was said about dumbness and hockey? Parros is a Princeton grad, majored in economics.

by Bleys on Dec 10, 2008 11:01 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

How can you expect to get your point across?

I guess I expected someone would actually address the matter at hand or actually read the comments above their tangential (at best) post?

Your personal anecdote about hockey is cute, but it has little relevance to what everyone is talking about.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 11:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Aw, be nice. I linked over to this discussion from the BoC comments because quite frankly I don’t follow the NBA enough to properly have this discussion. There’s been plenty raised about the role of fighting in hockey (how useful or necessary is it), and at least Bleys is getting towards that.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 11:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There’s a larger issue here than the role of fighting in hockey. As a hockey expert you can tell me how it’s part of the game and that’s fine. It’s something I’m not qualified to really argue.

But as a hoops junkie and follower of sports, racial politics, etc I can note that:

  • every night on Sportscenter I’m “treated” to a handful of bloody glorified violence in the NHL and it’s a head scratcher how it’s considered a family show
  • in the hockey promos that I see on TV they try to hype up the game by displaying these barbaric fights- so it’s integral to it’s marketing of “tough white dudes”
  • the NBA has the stigma of being the “thug” league even though there’s a tiny fraction of the physical violence that you see in the NHL and every knows the little fights in the NBA are mostly a joke and epically blown out of proportion
  • racism plays a tremendous role in what the NHL compared to the NBA can get away with

We could easily have combat basketball (see Riley, Pat), but that’s not going to fly in the NBA because of the racial makeup of the players and the racist attitudes and beliefs of America. If there’s a rare fight in the NBA the whole league is considered “ghetto”, but if there’s a fight in the NHL the individuals in the brawl are considered “tough”. Yes, the fun world in which we live in.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But I guess for me it’s that to have fighting in basketball, you’d have to introduce it. To eliminate fighting in hockey, you’d have to outlaw it. Those would be significant changes.

It’s probably too late for either sport to radically change what they are — for better or worse, fans are fans of the sport that they grew up with. That the media presents each sport to its fans with differing values should be somewhat expected — brutality is a tradition in some sports and not in others.

I do think that we should probably hand this discussion over to people who watch both hockey and basketball, though, as it stands to reason that they probably offer a better comparison viewpoint than you or I could. At least for me, it’s perfectly reasonable that there’s been unfair discrimination in the NBA — I’m just not in a position to know to what extent.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 12:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Can you imagine what the view of the league would be if they introduced fighting in basketball? Do you think it would get the same reception as fighting in hockey?

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Too late to change?

I wasn’t alive when it happened, but when the NBA instituted the 3 point line, that was a major shift in the game. What would prevent hockey from outlawing fighting even if it is a major shift as well? Would these rule changes be synonymous?

by Fantasy Junkie on Dec 10, 2008 5:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I suppose, but there should be a reason to change the sport, and I hope that would be based more on hockey fanbase opinion than basketball fanbase opinion. If hockey fans stop tolerating fighting, that’s the time to change the sport — it’s their dollars that matter to the owners and players.

I have no idea why the NBA implemented the 3-point line but I suspect it wasn’t because hockey fans preferred it.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 5:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

what he said

that was my point, to highlight why fighting is in hockey. Hockey is a physical sport by definition. When you understand why, strategically, fighting has a place in hockey, you can see why it isn’t a big deal when they fight. If basketball had that side to it, well then it wouldn’t be a big deal if they fought. But it doesn’t. Through that, you can see why on-court fights in the NBA draw out the “thug” moniker, but an on ice fight doesn’t.

by Bleys on Dec 10, 2008 3:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

not true again

it’s very relevant, because you can’t make the connection between the violence in hockey and the thuggery of it’s players, eg. none.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 12:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Great post Atma! (not)

Personally you lost me at “San Jose Dolphins” Not even sorta funny A-Bro.

I will give you props for lighting a huge fire though: Thuggary, Steriotypes, and the Race Card all in one post! WOW! Now all we need to do is throw in a Political slant: Hockey fans are all Conservative Republican Rednecks and NBA fans are all Liberal Democrat Pansies!!! Then this site would have one seriously massive conflagration!!!!

I think I hear the music now: The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire….

"Hold it down for the bay rep'n Oakland" --Keak Da Sneak

by KingCobra on Dec 10, 2008 1:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

get a clue

This is Willie O’Ree (right), the NHL’s answer to Jackie Robinson, and Cyril Allen (left). Allen is the coach of the Cal Berkeley club hockey team, and also an instructor as well as someone who is involved with the local rinks. Two prominent examples of how inclusive the sport is.

I have volunteered with youth athletics for 10+ years, and one problem with hockey in many places where you don’t grow up playing the sport is how expensive it is to get started. O’Ree has started a program with the NHL where any child can start the sport for only $50. Allen deserves a lot of credit for his work in the East Bay. From teaching skating and hockey classes, to keeping rinks open (or trying in Berkeley Iceland’s case), to helping giving college students a chance to play. How many sponsors to the club hockey teams have, how much does the school contribute to those sports? Very little.

“The NHL is an absolutely barbaric league that gets a pass for its thuggery because of the racial makeup of both its players and fans in stark contrast to the unfairly targeted and criminalized NBA.”

My only problem with fights in the NBA is how weak they are. If you are going to go, go, then deal with the consequences afterwards. Is hockey better or worse than boxing, better or worse than mma, than kickboxing/judo/wrestling/BJJ? Those are all very popular in the south and east bay. Fighting is one of many elements of the NHL, and that is one reason I enjoy the sport.

Delving into the racial makeup of the NHL and its fan base is kind of weird. I have met very few NBA fans who have a problem with the NHL. There are many who enjoy the sport, those who enjoy the fights, for some it is a curiosity or something that is not on the radar, but very few have ever blasted the sport as hard as you have. If you dont watch, fine, but leave the racial stuff out of it.

Or you can head down to Oakland Ice today and ask O’Ree his thoughts on the subject, or head down to Sharks Ice in San Jose Friday for the free hockey clinic there. I have always kind of admired Canada for leaving racial and ethnic politics at the door. Something it looks like you still need to work on.

by pj48 on Dec 10, 2008 1:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Uh-oh. PJ’s learning to insert pictures in comments now!

Forgive me, but this is just BoC’s third day on SBN, and I’m still in the “amazed” phase about all this functionality.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is Willie O’Ree (right), the NHL’s answer to Jackie Robinson, and Cyril Allen (left). Allen is the coach of the Cal Berkeley club hockey team, and also an instructor as well as someone who is involved with the local rinks. Two prominent examples of how inclusive the sport is.

Props to O’Ree, Allen, and yourself. Those are some very positive community efforts and only a fool wouldn’t support that.

BUT again this has nothing to do with my critique of the everyday violence in the NHL (fights obviously as it’s easy to equate a hard check with a hard hit in football or a good box out and hard foul in hoops) or how it gets a pass while the NBA is branded as the thug league despite minimal physical altercations. To leave the “racial stuff” out of it is simply being ignorant of the media landscape and double standards that exist in this country. That’s not in the DNA of GSoM. We examine and discuss these issues. I’m not saying anyone has to agree with me of course, but we’re here to discuss and learn.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 1:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well one, I think you are an idiot in how you phrased your question. And two, you haven’t really thrown out anything for a valid discussion other than some base insults. So instead of getting into this any furthur, I will just point to a good article I read yesterday.

YOU DON’T KNOW STEPHON MARBURY, "THE QUINTESSENTIAL SELFISH ATHLETE"
http://sportsonmymind.com/2008/12/03/you-dont-know-stephon-marbury/

Very good read.

by pj48 on Dec 10, 2008 1:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Huh?
Well one, I think you are an idiot in how you phrased your question.

Aren’t you the one who was critiquing how this wasn’t a productive and constructive discussion? Good job.

And two, you haven’t really thrown out anything for a valid discussion other than some base insults.

Right. Well since you haven’t addressed any of the very valid critiques that I or others have the burden that seems like a real deal cop out.

So instead of getting into this any furthur, I will just point to a good article I read yesterday.

YOU DON’T KNOW STEPHON MARBURY, “THE QUINTESSENTIAL SELFISH ATHLETE”
http://sportsonmymind.com/2008/12/03/you-dont-know-stephon-marbury/

Very good read.

It is indeed an excellent article. The author of that piece Modi is my longtime blog-buddy. I wouldn’t be all that surprised if Modi had a similar take than I did about the racist double standards facing the NBA and NHL.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 2:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is a non-sequitur not a double standard. You took two problems facing one sport and used that to completely blast another sport and its fans. Not really anything to discuss.

by pj48 on Dec 10, 2008 5:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is all very silly.

Your entire argument is planted with seeds of ignorance. Your crass stereotype that every single player in the NHL is white, is frankly disgusting. It may not be as ethnically diverse as the NBA, per se, but the only person making this a race issue is you.

Secondly, to sit here and lie about what you see on sportscenter and what not, is another reason why your argument is holding little to no water. The only people who care to seek out the fights that happen within the NHL, are fans themselves.

It’s not a race issue, it’s a culture issue. If you feel that it’s too barbaric, perhaps you feel that way about MMA. I guess you wouldn’t though, because of guys like Cheikh Congo and Anderson Silva. As long as there are people of color playing, there isn’t a problem? Give me a break, man.

Also: you just taking every argument that combats your ridiculous notion that the NHL as a league is successful because of a stereotype you made up and saying “No but that’s not what I’m saying, I’m saying black people are unfairly stereotyped as thugs. I know there are good black people in the world, and even black people playing in the NHL, but nooo you can’t prove me wrong.” is stupid. You’ve already said you have no idea what you’re talking about. If you’re truly drinking in the opinions of other people, you’re doing a terrible, terrible job at showing it.

Why do you feel the need to play the race card so often? Not everything is as cut and dry as you’d like to make it, buddy. Not everyone is out to get us. Hockey is hockey, deep rooted in it’s history and it has been for years. You can’t just call it racist because the NBA choose to have a different decorum for it’s players to live by.

Mike Grier is a god damn boss, dude. Talk to him about how hard Blacks have it in the NHL.

by 003MorrowNeverDies on Dec 10, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Your entire argument is planted with seeds of ignorance. Your crass stereotype that every single player in the NHL is white, is frankly disgusting. It may not be as ethnically diverse as the NBA, per se, but the only person making this a race issue is you.

Um, I don’t think it’s only me. Nowhere have I said “every single player in the NHL is white”. It’s predominantly white. Just like the NBA is predominantly black.

Secondly, to sit here and lie about what you see on sportscenter and what not, is another reason why your argument is holding little to no water.

Lie about what I see on Sportscenter? How would you know what I see on Sportscenter?

The only people who care to seek out the fights that happen within the NHL, are fans themselves.

So the fans are the bloodthirsty barbaric ones?

It’s not a race issue, it’s a culture issue.

We’ve all heard this sort of cultural rhetoric time and time again from the right wing of the Republican party. Post 70’s in this country cultural critiques has been used to mask racist critiques. This is not a new game.

If you feel that it’s too barbaric, perhaps you feel that way about MMA. I guess you wouldn’t though, because of guys like Cheikh Congo and Anderson Silva. As long as there are people of color playing, there isn’t a problem? Give me a break, man.

Right and where did I say this?
I will say I’m conflicted about how barbaric boxing, MMA, UFC are. On one hand they are incredibly violent and appeal to the lowest urges and impulses of people kind. But on the other hand there’s an art and skill behind them. These are incredibly well trained athletes. That’s the sport. If someone’s going to argue that these are barbaric sports however, I don’t think I could come up with a solid reasoning to challenge their position.

But as my man FJ pointed above how is a fistfight endemic to hockey as a sport? We’ve all noted that the pushes, checks, etc are part of the game, but why the constant “street fight on ice” sideshow that you claim fans lust after? Why is that acceptable but the 90’s rough housing of Rileyball on the Knicks and the Pistons Bad Boys was “bad for the league” and “too thug”? Keep in mind there was nothing there that even approached the nightly violence in the NHL today.

You’ve already said you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Actually I said I admittedly don’t follow hockey one bit.

Why do you feel the need to play the race card so often? Not everything is as cut and dry as you’d like to make it, buddy. Not everyone is out to get us. Hockey is hockey, deep rooted in it’s history and it has been for years. You can’t just call it racist because the NBA choose to have a different decorum for it’s players to live by.

Racism isn’t some card you just play with. It’s a real and tangible problem still facing this country (yes hard for many to understand even though the moderate Obama just got elected),

My point is that the NBA didn’t have a choice in decorum for it’s players to live by. The NHL can succeed with nightly bloody violence because of it’s predominantly white player-force, but the NBA doesn’t have that opportunity because it constantly has to avoid the stereotypes of young black males prevalent in this country. Even the slightest slip (the Melo-Nate slapfight or any rough foul) creates the biggest stir and cultural blame game. It’s about the individual thug in the NHL, but about the entire association of thugs in the NBA- why?

Mike Grier is a god damn boss, dude. Talk to him about how hard Blacks have it in the NHL.

Props to Grier. Again one isolated person of color in the NHL does nothing to disprove the points people have been outlining here.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 2:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ohh... I seee.
Props to Grier. Again one isolated person of color in the NHL does nothing to disprove the points people I have been outlining here.

Fixed that for you.

by 003MorrowNeverDies on Dec 10, 2008 2:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Talk to him about how hard Blacks have it in the NHL.

Forgot to add- I don’t think anyone (at least I haven’t) made the argument that Blacks or other people of color have it hard in the NHL. That’s not the issue at hand.

Now if I made the argument that “Blacks have it hard in the NHL” you could rightfully call me on it, since I don’t follow the NHL passionately.

Just curious since we’ve attracted some sharp hockey-heads to this thread- what are the experiences of non-whites in the NHL? It sounds like a really interesting topic because:
1) they’re statistical anomalies
2) it’s not really a league that gets all that much love in-group

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 2:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So the fans are the bloodthirsty barbaric ones?

More or less, but your terminology is pretty rough — it’s more that we have differing views on how to characterize fighting. You’re very willing to throw the terms “bloodthirsty” and “barbaric” at it, as are some hockey fans. For a great portion of the NHL’s fanbase, however, that’s not how it would be characterized. I think your appreciations in boxing kind of mirror that.

But yes, if there were no fans that liked fighting it would get out of the game fast. There is a demand for it, largely by people who see it in a different and acceptable light.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 2:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BUT again this has nothing to do with my critique of the everyday violence in the NHL (fights obviously as it’s easy to equate a hard check with a hard hit in football or a good box out and hard foul in hoops) or how it gets a pass while the NBA is branded as the thug league despite minimal physical altercations. To leave the "racial stuff" out of it is simply being ignorant of the media landscape and double standards that exist in this country. That’s not in the DNA of GSoM. We examine and discuss these issues. I’m not saying anyone has to agree with me of course, but we’re here to discuss and learn.

I think you just answered your own question. While the NBA has minimal physical altercations on the court, off the court, it is known as a league whose athletes frequently get into trouble with the law. Similarly, in the NFL, it’s off field legal troubles are much more well documented, and occur much more frequently than those of MLB or NHL’s athletes.

While the previously mentioned cases of Chris Simon, Marty McSorley, Bertuzzi etc, on ice goonery/thuggery in the NHL are well documented by mainstream media. The fact that they occur on ice, during games, in the heat of physical play – mean they by definition will be categorized differently by the media. (that doesn’t mean they are condoned, the majority consensus in the NHL is all 3 of those players I mentioned should be in prison, or at least have been vilified by the NHL and the media)

Where as, when I watch the 500th iteration of an NFL or NBA star getting in trouble with the law over off court/field issues(usually involving some idiotic gun play), naturally, the inclination of the public is to label the athletes from those sports as more “thuggish”(or whatever term you want to use).

The simple fact that the racial makeup of the NBA is predominantly black, and the racial makeup of the NHL predominantly white, means that race will always be an issue when this discussion comes up. But I think pj48’s post makes an important point. That the NHL’s fanbase and athletes are predominantly white is not because of some overt racial prejudice, but an economic one.
So, while you may think the media and public has some sort of racial prejudice when viewing off court/off ice events, IMO, I see it as more of a reflection of the economic backgrounds these 2 sports come from.

NBA and NFL players generally come from poorer, inner city neighborhoods, and have grown up in an environment where a situation like Plaxico Burress thinks it’s normal to walk into a night club carrying a loaded weapon in his sweatpants. I doubt there was ever a point in time when Wayne Gretzky was growing up that he had to worry about protecting himself by carrying a loaded weapon while going out at night with friends …

Don't bRuin your life. Make love with a Trojan

by Morbo on Dec 10, 2008 2:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A Trojan is only good once, a Bruin lasts forever

But anyway,

“Where as, when I watch the 500th iteration of an NFL or NBA star getting in trouble with the law over off court/field issues(usually involving some idiotic gun play), naturally, the inclination of the public is to label the athletes from those sports as more "thuggish"(or whatever term you want to use).”

Exactly. The troubles of black athletes are well documented by the media, the troubles of white athletes are not unless they are extremely severe (Chris Benoit), or force the media to have no other choice (Roger Clemens, if he didn’t push to save his image, he would never have gotten into this mess, they didn’t want to do it to him like they do Bonds).

The problem starts out much higher than the fans or the “culture.” The filter which we get our information has an undeniably white tint. “Naturally the inclination of the public is to label the athletes from those sports as more thuggish” because the public doesn’t know any better. Their opinions are subtly influenced by the media, and they think the media is fair and balanced because when an act of overt, obvious racism or just prejudice occurs (like Don Imus) the media will jump all over it. Thus it looks like they call out racism when they see it and their portrayal of black athletes is a reflection of just that athlete, but they know that that isn’t true. And they know that this method will get the public to have a “natural inclination” against black athletes.

Eff the Trojans.

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 2:43 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

there

There is a fine line between taking steroids and cheating in the sport then brandishing and shooting a weapon in public.
Don’t compare the two.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 2:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

one problem with hockey in many places where you don’t grow up playing the sport is how expensive it is to get started.

  That’s cause it’s unnatural to put a cold weather sport in a warm weather location. Just like putting Mickey’D’s in china or trying to grow cotton in british columbia. Things work better when they evolve in their environment. The money spent trying to push hockey in california would probably be better spent promoting warm weather sports. It’s not good to homogenize the world.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 10, 2008 2:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s cause it’s unnatural to put a cold weather sport in a warm weather location.

Shrug. Supply meets demand, for the most part. Of course hockey’s got nowhere near the fanbase that baskeball does at least down here in OC (everybody’s a goddamn Laker fan). But hockey fans in CA do exist, and are quite passionate, and the teams draw decently.

It’s kind of what BoC’s all about, in a sense. CA hockey fans are a minority fanbase both in the hockey world and in their own state. But hey, so long as the there’s money to be made playing hockey in CA, it’ll happen. Whether warm weather sports neeed more promoting, I dunno. I’d rather have options, I guess.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 10, 2008 2:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Roller hockey is a warm weather sport :P

by Netsky on Dec 10, 2008 2:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Roller hockey is a warm weather sport :P

  No it’s more like a wanna be of a cold weather sport. Skateboarding is a warm weather sport.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 10, 2008 2:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Skateboarding is a sport?

by Netsky on Dec 10, 2008 2:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Skateboarding is a sport?

  X games baby!

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 10, 2008 2:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Uh oh....

I’m sorry Skeptic, but I think I just threw up a little in my mouth…

X games???!!!! gag At least reference something legit like the Dew tour or that show with Ryan Shekler (sp?)… haha oh gee, here I go again gag

Yep, defintaltey vomit in my mouth.

"Hold it down for the bay rep'n Oakland" --Keak Da Sneak

by KingCobra on Dec 11, 2008 9:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you can say the same thing about football

unless just tossing the ball around is enough

by qin on Dec 10, 2008 6:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

New poster here...

I’m coming at this from being 1.) an African-American, age 50, so I’ve seen some stuff 2.) a hockey fan first and foremost and 3.) a Warriors fan (from my days in the Bay Area, the Run TMC days)

You have a great site here, and now living in Chicago, this is the place I come for my Warriors fix.

There is a lot of back and forth here, and I wanted to drop in my .02 if I could

 I can understand the perception of a double standard, believe me, but I don’t really see it, at least in the United States…hockey lost a lot of prestige with the lockout, and with it much of the media attention it enjoyed in the 70’s and 80’s…even pre-lockout, the NHL had no shortage of critics because of the violence and it idiotic business model it had last decade and well into this one…and let’s face it…the NBA isn’t the league that has had trouble keeping a national television contract in the U.S…if there is something that the general public isn’t liking about basketball, even with the alleged image problems, I’m not seeing it.

The fanbases are totally different, for the most part, so the fact that there are large groups that don’t like either hockey or basketball is not surprising to me…it’s just what you grew up with, for the most part, and what you like…it’s like me and NASCAR…I wouldn’t cross the street to see cars racing around and around a track, but I’d drive 100 miles to see a hockey game or my Warriors…I deplore violence of all sorts, so despite my passion for hockey, I could do without the fights, but I understand why they occur and it doesn’t deter from my enjoyment of what is an incredible beautiful game…I understand basketball less, but if the W’s are playing, well, I just follow the back and forth!

As I said, you have a great site and I hope to contribute more now that I signed up for GSoM… I’m just getting to know the gang at BoC, and I like them too…I hope we can have some honest debate without resorting to name calling and such…we are all intelligent grown folks here…let’s debate the merits of our favorite sports in a respectful but passionate way.

Thanks for listening

by tbell61 on Dec 10, 2008 2:34 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Good thoughts

Just curious about this part:

even pre-lockout, the NHL had no shortage of critics because of the violence and it idiotic business model it had last decade and well into this one…and let’s face it…the NBA isn’t the league that has had trouble keeping a national television contract in the U.S

What’s so “idiotic” about the NHL’s business model? It seems very similar to the NBA- get local TV contracts even if attendance is low. I know they don’t have a great national TV deal (Versus?), but other than that the NBA and NHL have similar business models. Interested to hear your thoughts about this.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 2:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In my opinion,

I think the league expanded too quickly into non-traditional hockey markets, without the national TV revenue to back it up…I think we are seeing that, to some extent with the problems of the two franchises in Florida…I’d have to look this up, but my general feeling is that each year from about 1996 or so, there were fewer hockey games available on National TV, as ESPN cut back on their coverage, and the league was not seen on NBC until well after football was over.

Also, the labor relationship between the players and owners was quite a bit different between the two leagues, IIRC…for decades, hockey owners treated the players badly, and I think it came back to bite them in the ass in 2004 when the situation became so bad, they shut down the league for a year…that’s hard to recover from when you are competing with the big three, plus college sports and what was then a rapidly emerging NASCAR scene

Perhaps, “idiotic” was too strong a term…however, the NBA owners didn’t shut down their league for a year…what would you call that.

by tbell61 on Dec 10, 2008 2:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Interested to hear your thoughts about this.

  I don’t like it when they put hockey on instead of the warriors.
    otherwise I don’t really care what hockey or it’s fans do, just like if Palin stays in Alaska she’s fine with me.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Dec 10, 2008 2:45 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I’m equally a fan of both teams, but since the Warriors are bad and the Sharks are having one of the best starts in the history of the NHL, I’d rather watch the Sharks. If the Warriors were as good as the Sharks it’d be a tough decision, but I would be complaining too much :)

But I get CSN+ so it really doesn’t matter all that much.

by Netsky on Dec 10, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wouldn’t be complaining* haha

by Netsky on Dec 10, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

god...

First Where Do most of hockey players come from? They dont even come from America. They come from places like Russia Canada and Sweeden. WHERE IT IS REALLY REALLY COLD. DO you ever follow the Olympics? How many times has the American team Won? This is how it has always been.

 If you are a person of color do you start idolizing some great Russian players like Ovechkin from Russia who looks like a 30 year old man? Zetterburg from Sweden? Crosby from Canada? Watch the Olympics in two years. Russia Vs. Canada are insanely stacked teams. These countries have always been know for their ethnic diversity.

 Mike Grier is a great player for the Sharks. He is a great grinder and is awesome on the penalty kill. A great example of an American player. But he is absolutely boring to watch. He doesn’t have any finesse, and no real shot. He gets the more break aways then any one but I have no expectations of any thing exciting to see. He will get some goals in but would you make him your Idol like Lebron James? No! Humans as a species have always had more affiliation with people we look like.

Basketball is an American sport. America dominates. We have people to look up to. No one is color blind to race. We idolize people who look like us.

by Fozz on Dec 10, 2008 4:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Canada is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. Toronto, in particular.

As for the makeup of the NHL, the American influence is large and always getting bigger. The U.S. will be a major player in international competition going forward:

You’re absolutely right, hockey’s not a sport filled with people of colour, and no one’s saying you have to watch it or idolize its athletes. But that also doesn’t make the league not worthwhile or barbaric or whatever. Just different.

by James Mirtle on Dec 10, 2008 5:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Fozz + James Mirtle

It’s always good to learn about hockey from passionate fans such as yourselves, but I don’t think anyone’s arguing if hockey is American or anything about identifying with its athletes.

I’ve called the NHL barbaric because of the bloody nightly fights which are legal and the fans in stands cheer on a la Fight Club. Blez, one of the biggest hockey fans you’ll ever meet, also noted that it was barbaric.

And trust me I look nothing like Lebron James. If I did have his height/ weight/ skill, trust me the last thing I’d be doing is blogging right now. Haha

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 7:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s all within the context of the game. And as I said earlier, fights are extremely rare, at a rate of one every two games, and take place between mostly fringe players on the roster.

It’s a very small part of a physical, brutal game. It’s a fierce contact sport, like rugby or MMA or whatever. I don’t think you can compare it to basketball.

by James Mirtle on Dec 10, 2008 10:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

fights are extremely rare, at a rate of one every two games

That’s rare? Doesn’t seem like a small part of the game if it’s happening that often.

In the NBA I’d say it’s about 2 out of every 1230 games if that (2 a season).

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 6:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You said so yourself

you don’t watch hockey, how do you know fights happen that often. Even if they did happen often, there’s a hole in your logic.

If you don’t watch hockey, it’s not fair to make this argument

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 11, 2008 9:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

espn highlights maybe?

how often do we not see fights on espn. in fact, i was watching clips from last nights sharks game, and lo and behold. fights! along with great plays of course.

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 12, 2008 7:11 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

The NBA probably has fewer bodychecks, too, no? Not that many jump shots in the NHL lately.

by James Mirtle on Dec 11, 2008 11:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There’s a flaw in your logic here. They’re rare in the NBA because it’s illegal in the NBA. Again fighting is legal in hockey and is accepted as part of the game. Because of that, you will see fights happen. If the NBA were to legalize fighting (it will never happen), you would probably see fights on a nightly basis as well. And if fights were made illegal in hockey, you would probably see the same type of results, where there might be 2 a season.

by Wooster11 on Dec 13, 2008 9:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not at all

See the discussion above about how what’s accepted and legal between the two sports is informed by history. The question to ask is why, especially the point you said:

If the NBA were to legalize fighting (it will never happen)

Why not and why can’t it? It isn’t the gentlemen’s game like golf or tennis that some hockey fans have made it out to be by any stretch.

The cultural and historical arguments that some hockey folks have put together here are only partial explanations at best.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 14, 2008 10:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Go back and watch Douglas Murray’s 1-on-1 battles with Calgary Flames captain Jarome Ignila last year in the first round of the Sharks playoffs. This is a regular season photo, but Iginla is one of the most explosive talents in the league.

by pj48 on Dec 10, 2008 5:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

In response to belilaugh:

Good point, but once again I think too broad a generalization is being made:

Acceptance of Hockey Fights + Condemnation of Basketball Fights = Racism.

I’m not saying that professional sports are excluded from racism, but something that is legal in the rulebook versus something that is illegal are two completely different situations. Just like any culture on the planet, different situations carry different connotations in respect to their backgrounds.

When an African American drops the gloves in hockey he isn’t perceived as any more of a “thug” than if a Caucasian did. I would assume (granted I watch very little of the NBA so I could be wrong here) that if an African-American got into a fight during a basketball game, he would be held to the same standard as a Caucasian player. If that’s not the case, then it would be an inherent problem with the media’s perception of the NBA- I don’t think the NHL would have anything to do with it.

Two notable “enforcers” (hockey jargon for "fighter") are Donald Brashear and Georges Laraque. They are very much respected for their contributions to the team, and both happen to be African American.

What you have is different rules for different situations. It doesn’t make one sport superior to the other, but it sure as hell as nothing to do with race.

Fear The Fin: Where the second round is overrated.

by Mr. Plank on Dec 10, 2008 5:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

When an African American drops the gloves in hockey he isn’t perceived as any more of a "thug" than if a Caucasian did. I would assume (granted I watch very little of the NBA so I could be wrong here) that if an African-American got into a fight during a basketball game, he would be held to the same standard as a Caucasian player. If that’s not the case, then it would be an inherent problem with the media’s perception of the NBA- I don’t think the NHL would have anything to do with it.

Two notable "enforcers" (hockey jargon for "fighter") are Donald Brashear and Georges Laraque. They are very much respected for their contributions to the team, and both happen to be African American.

That’s probably the most valid argument I’ve read in this entire thread about why racism DOES NOT play a role in the acceptance of fighting in the NHL vs the different standards in the NBA.

I’m curious to hear whether Brashear and Laraque often get involved in these fights? I’ve never seen them on Sportscenter (my limited hockey knowledge comes primarily from there) in those barbaric fights. If they do and the coverage and fan reaction is the same as with white players in the NHL, that’s a great unexpected step forward.

At a micro level this is very interesting, but I’ll still contend that at a macro-level that NBA is considered a Black league, the NHL a White one, and with that the associated double-standards in American society with violence and criminalization.

What you have is different rules for different situations. It doesn’t make one sport superior to the other, but it sure as hell as nothing to do with race.

See above. The rules and cultures of the two leagues are informed by racial stereotypes and inequalities in media coverage and American attitudes and perceptions. The NHL CAN be violent and successful. The NBA can’t.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 7:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m curious to hear whether Brashear and Laraque often get involved in these fights? I’ve never seen them on Sportscenter (my limited hockey knowledge comes primarily from there) in those barbaric fights. If they do and the coverage and fan reaction is the same as with white players in the NHL, that’s a great unexpected step forward.

Brashear and Laraque both lead their respective teams in fighting majors, as well as being some of the most prominent enforcers in the game.

Just an aside- if one of the main reasons you avoid the sport of hockey is fights, the San Jose Sharks are probably your type of team. We have one of the lowest amounts of fighting incidents in the league, and win games with speed and exceptional puck movement. They’re local, have established a great record thus far, and look to have a bright future.

At a micro level this is very interesting, but I’ll still contend that at a macro-level that NBA is considered a Black league, the NHL a White one, and with that the associated double-standards in American society with violence and criminalization…..

….The rules and cultures of the two leagues are informed by racial stereotypes and inequalities in media coverage and American attitudes and perceptions. The NHL CAN be violent and successful. The NBA can’t.

It seems to me that your problem lies with American society as a whole- I’m still uncertain as to why the NHL is in play here, especially considering the lack of media coverage of the sport on major news channels such as ESPN.

Fear The Fin: Where the second round is overrated.

by Mr. Plank on Dec 10, 2008 8:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the issue

is about the perception of race and its role on the perception of 2 very different sports.

the major sports media, which is by far the greatest source of our information regarding these 2 sports, is the heart of this discussion. i think it helpful to find the common link between the 2 sports in the MSM’s coverage of them. that is:

hockey has it, whether you believe it is a valid aspect of the sport or not; it is within the current rules of the game. it is a common and expected occurrence.

basketball very very rarely is violent. violence is for the most part against the rules and is also very unexpected.

Sports media, as does all major media, needs to attract audience. VIOLENCE draws a crowd. from our days on the playground when two kids would fight over a girl to a nasty car wreck that slows traffic in all directions, something in a lot of people is fascinated by VIOLENCE.

this truth is capitalized on by the media,
in BB by playing to people’s (mostly WRONG) fears and (mostly WRONG) suspicions that BLACK PEOPLE are violent and thuggish.
in Hockey by only tuning in when a particularly bloody fight (most NHL fights are not much more than grappling matches) or heinous incident (a la chris simon).

i really appreciated everyones incite so far, i think we can all agree that our favorite pass-times are poorly and often unfairly portrayed.

LONG LIVE SPORT.

by denver_diaspora on Dec 16, 2008 9:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You focus too much on the individual. Individually, there is a lot more wiggle room than there is for an entire group.

Black athletes playing in a white sport, the sport will overshadow the individual. Same with white athletes in a black sport. Because one of these two (the sport, which is like the sports microcosm for the community at large) represents a larger image than the other. It is much more effective to villainize a black athlete in a black sport because the connotations are much larger than the demonization of that one individual, they demonize they entire race. Dehumanizing a Mike Grier will almost certainly never have the same effect as dehumanizing a Stephon Marbury. Dehumanizing Jimmy Rollins will not (unless the MLB has a big shift in racial makeup) have the same effect as dehumanizing Sean Taylor.

Race is a complicated matter, and there are many levels of it. In this situation, individual racism looks non-existent, but collective racism (which is much more dangerous) is in full effect. If you ever hear someone saying they can’t be racist because they have black friends, this is exactly why they are full of sh*t. WHite society is a lot more accepting of integrated blacks than other blacks.

by belilaugh on Dec 10, 2008 7:39 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Race is a complicated matter, and there are many levels of it. In this situation, individual racism looks non-existent, but collective racism (which is much more dangerous) is in full effect. If you ever hear someone saying they can’t be racist because they have black friends, this is exactly why they are full of sh*t. WHite society is a lot more accepting of integrated blacks than other blacks.

Damn man. Speak on it!

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 7:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So wrong

no proof of it.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 11:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There will never be any extremely obvious proof of this by the mainstream media because if true feelings and attitudes were expressed the fabric of white American society might just crumble. But that doesn’t mean there is not any proof, or at least implications of racial bias at work.

by belilaugh on Dec 11, 2008 12:28 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Goes

both ways. Cop out answer too.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 11, 2008 1:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

“Cop out answer too.”

Ironic…

But anyway, you clearly have your mind made up, so let me reiterate. There is proof, but not for someone who will refuse the proof or bring up other reasons why it’s not racist when in reality one explanation of a situation does not mean that the other can’t exist as well. So I will waste my time explaining it, but not to you, because I know there is no hope of getting you to listen.

by belilaugh on Dec 11, 2008 11:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Revisiting your equation

Hopefully belilaugh can make this clearer, but what I’m seeing:

Encouragement/ praise/ acceptance of NHL nightly bloody fights with a predominantly white player composition and fanbase

+

Condemnation of incredibly rare NBA slap/ push fights by predominately Black players with a very multicultural fanbase (both stereotyped at thugs)

=

Unfair double standard where racism plays a huge role

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 9:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I really don’t understand how you’re making this connection. I’ve layed out everything I feel is necessary to say, and frankly only came back because one of our shared readers was banned from the site after he voiced his opinion in this thread. I’m not asking why, I’m not questioning your ability to boot people at your discretion. I’m here because someone’s voice was taken away.

Fighting in hockey is part of the sports roots. Fighting in basketball is not. I’ve layed it all out in various portions of this thread. We’re running in circles now.

Consider where your game’s roots are from. Hell, who founded the sport? Wasn’t it a Canadian guy? I don’t understand the connection you’re making- it seems haphazard, and frankly an attempt to bait people into talking about things that are not connected in any way.

“Barbaric”, “San Jose Dolphins”, “racial makeup of players and fans”, “thuggery”.

These are all shock words. Next time please approach the very sensitive subject of racism with a little more class and research.

Fear The Fin: Where the second round is overrated.

by Mr. Plank on Dec 12, 2008 3:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

frankly only came back because one of our shared readers was banned from the site after he voiced his opinion in this thread. I’m not asking why, I’m not questioning your ability to boot people at your discretion. I’m here because someone’s voice was taken away.

Sorry man but that’s distorting reality. That commenter was warned 3 times that swearing is not allowed on GSoM, yet still continued to do so. It’s a family show and that’s integral to the character of this community. That’s always been the rule here and what ensures we can have a constructive and intelligent discussion, which this has mostly been.

Please don’t distort something you don’t know anything about. If you’re even going to slightly posit that a commenter’s voice was silenced her because I personally didn’t agree with their views you need only look at the majority of the comments in this thread that critique with varying levels of success that points I and others have layed out. They’re far more intelligent and well-reasoned that the commenter you’re blindly trying to support. Don’t you think if your reasoning was true we’d “silence” those first?

People have been banned here for profanity and personal attacks even when I or the other writers of the site actually agreed with their underlying arguments.

Fighting in hockey is part of the sports roots. Fighting in basketball is not. I’ve layed it all out in various portions of this thread. We’re running in circles now.

FJ has asked numerous times why fighting is so critical to a sport where the goal is to get a puck into a net and I don’t see any good answers.

I’ve layed out how hoops has had a rough-housing past, but not a single person has addressed it.

DJ Fuzzy Logic has clearly outlined the inequalities in what’s deemed appropriate for different racial groups to exercise their emotions.

We’re running in circles here precisely because you and many others have failed to address these points. Look up and down this thread- I and others have acknowledged good points that challenged my thinking.

"Barbaric", "San Jose Dolphins", "racial makeup of players and fans", "thuggery".

"Barbaric"- See below for the definition and application. Seems to fit the NHL to me.

"San Jose Dolphins"- Obviously that’s a joke. Look at the context. A bad one probably, but a joke nevertheless. If that offends you, then hockey fan’s claims to hyper-masculinity because of the silly violence in their sport seem especially dumbfounded.

"racial makeup of players and fans"- That’s a critique. Nothing racist or shocking about it. There’s nothing wrong with analyzing race in this country or having a viable discussion about it. Maybe that’s not allowed on Fear the Fin, but it’s always produced some interesting discussions here.

"thuggery"- See above. Blez has even conceded that it is a thug sport. The pics below that a hockey fan used to glorify the rough-housing in the NHL further demonstrate that this league markets itself on thuggery.

These are all shock words. Next time please approach the very sensitive subject of racism with a little more class and research.

Next time please carefully read the very intelligent points before making these silly allegations that are both classless and done without any evidence. There’s plenty of good stuff in this thread from all sides and folks from all over. Seems pretty classy to me.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 12, 2008 9:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

FJ has asked numerous times why fighting is so critical to a sport where the goal is to get a puck into a net and I don’t see any good answers.

I don’t know what you are looking for here, but I feel comfortable saying that if coaches felt like fights were costing their teams wins, fighting would go away on its own. If owners felt like fights were costing their teams fans, fighting would got away on its own. Neither appears to be the case as of yet, so regardless of whether we can properly say that it is “critical” to the sport, it definitely has its role in hockey and its fanbase.

Besides, we are talking about sports here — I doubt anything is truly critical. For me, I’m largely ignorant on basketball, but is dribbling really critical for a sport where the goal is to get a ball through the hoop? I could imagine a sport without dribbling, why does it persist? Is it truly necessary for the game, or is it there because it always has been?

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 12, 2008 9:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

WHAT WE ARE ALL SAYING

the issue
is about the perception of race and its role on the perception of 2 very different sports.

the major sports media, which is by far the greatest source of our information regarding these 2 sports, is the heart of this discussion. i think it helpful to find the common link between the 2 sports in the MSM’s coverage of them. that is:

hockey has it, whether you believe it is a valid aspect of the sport or not; it is within the current rules of the game. it is a common and expected occurrence.

basketball very very rarely is violent. violence is for the most part against the rules and is also very unexpected.

Sports media, as does all major media, needs to attract audience. VIOLENCE draws a crowd. from our days on the playground when two kids would fight over a girl to a nasty car wreck that slows traffic in all directions, something in a lot of people is fascinated by VIOLENCE.

this truth is capitalized on by the media,
in BB by playing to people’s (mostly WRONG) fears and (mostly WRONG) suspicions that BLACK PEOPLE are violent and thuggish.
in Hockey by only tuning in when a particularly bloody fight (most NHL fights are not much more than grappling matches) or heinous incident (a la chris simon).

i really appreciated everyones incite so far, i think we can all agree that our favorite pass-times are poorly and often unfairly portrayed.

LONG LIVE SPORT.

by denver_diaspora on Dec 16, 2008 9:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My opinion (if anyone cares that is):

Before I start I would like to say. I’m a huge hockey fan and I’m not the biggest basketball fan (i probably just don’t understand the game, much like some of you who probably don’t understand hockey the way hockey fans do).

Both you hockey and basketball fans cannot compare the two completely different sports together. This is like saying how violent UFC is compared to NASCAR.

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 10, 2008 5:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is like saying how violent UFC is compared to NASCAR.

That’s about it.

Besides, fighting is a very, very small portion of hockey. The NHL averages about one fight every two games, and it’s generally between two fringe players on the team. Unlike the NBA, it’s also considered within the rules of the game.

by James Mirtle on Dec 10, 2008 6:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Fighting in hockey is almost always 1-on-1. There used to bench-clearing brawls in the game and people thought it was a “thug” sport. The NHL worked very hard to clean up that part of the game and make it that if guys are going to fight, then it’s at least between two men. And it’s worked. If guys squared off and traded punches in basketball, I don’t think people would mind. It’s the fact that it’s usually both teams involved in a melee that upsets people.

And why is fighting in hockey even a problem? It’s awesome. I wish I could have seen Charles Oakley and Patrick Ewing square off, and I think everyone here would like to see a Warrior punch Luke Walton in the face.

The racism that drips from basketball’s perception is abominable, but I"m not sure if it relates to hockey. The only thing I can think of is that people call hockey players “working class” while basketball players are usually referred to as poor.

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 10, 2008 6:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It’s the fact that it’s usually both teams involved in a melee that upsets people.

Those melee’s are so rare in the NBA. In this past decade I would bet there’s no more than 5 if that. They’re usually just silly slap and push fights which happen between every other play in the NFL and are no harsher than the routine shoving and pushing in the NHL.

And why is fighting in hockey even a problem? It’s awesome. I wish I could have seen Charles Oakley and Patrick Ewing square off, and I think everyone here would like to see a Warrior punch Luke Walton in the face.

Um no. Actually that would be barbaric.

The racism that drips from basketball’s perception is abominable, but I"m not sure if it relates to hockey.

I’m not saying by any stretch that hockey is the cause or is responsible for the racist depictions of the NBA especially pertaining to the rare occurrences of violence. I’m using the NHL to illustrate a double standard. I’m not blaming the NHL by any means.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 10, 2008 7:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Those melee’s are so rare in the NBA. In this past decade I would bet there’s no more than 5 if that.

Yeah, but those are the only fights that happen in the NBA, as compared to the many, many one-on-one fights that occur in the NHL. I think you could make a much better case if you compared the NBA’s fights to bench-clearing brawls in baseball.

Fighting in hockey is a lot like bare knuckle boxing used to be, where guys don’t get knocked out because fighters can’t put their whole weight behind a punch. It’s 1,000x safer than boxing and fighters hardly ever suffer from long-term effects.

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 10, 2008 7:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but those are the only fights that happen in the NBA, as compared to the many, many one-on-one fights that occur in the NHL. I think you could make a much better case if you compared the NBA’s fights to bench-clearing brawls in baseball.

That’s also a great point. There does exist a double standard in the way baseball brawls and basketball brawls are portrayed and received by middle American and the media. Baseball junkies can jump in with specifics here but as I understand/ see it:

  • baseball bench clearing brawls happen way more frequently than the NBA, yet the MLB is a “goold ol’ boy” league and the NBA is the “thug league”
  • the penalties for participating in these baseball brawls and leaving the dugout pale in comparison to the lengthy and heavy fines that David Stern and company mandate in the NBA
Fighting in hockey is a lot like bare knuckle boxing used to be, where guys don’t get knocked out because fighters can’t put their whole weight behind a punch. It’s 1,000x safer than boxing and fighters hardly ever suffer from long-term effects.

That’s all good and fine, but I still don’t buy that legalized fighting in a sport that isn’t even about fighting is both very unnecessary and crude.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 8:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the NHL

Is not an example for the fabricated double standard you have made. “Racist depictions of the nba” — what??? Who actually sees the NBA as a bunch of black guys running all “thugged” out and jumping each other. So stupid.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 10, 2008 11:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My friend’s dad said that every player in the NBA was a thug except for Steve Nash…take that as you will.

I hate using the personal argument as it doesn’t really prove anything, but you have to realize that you do not know everybody in the US, and you do not know their views.

And even if you don’t see that you see this, you can still be influenced to subliminally make this connection.

by belilaugh on Dec 11, 2008 12:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

so it's therefore

ok for Atma to assume we all share his views?

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 11, 2008 1:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Very confusing logic

Where did I assume everyone shares my views? Try actually reading what people are writing and you’ll find a very interesting discussion where folks are trying to actually learn and throw out there own ideas and analysis in a safe space. If you’re just here to flame and spam, you should probably take your act somewhere else.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 8:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Who actually sees the NBA as a bunch of black guys running all "thugged" out and jumping each other.

Umm, a lot of people?

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 11, 2008 8:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Defintion's of Barbaric:

1. without civilizing influences; uncivilized; primitive: barbaric invaders.
2. of, like, or befitting barbarians: a barbaric empire; barbaric practices.
3. crudely rich or splendid: barbaric decorations.

just to clear some things up, barbaric is clearly the wrong word to describe fighting in hockey

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 10, 2008 7:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sounds about right to me

1. Those silly fights are uncivilized and primitive. Listen to the language fans and media alike use in sports. “We went into their house and beat them”- there’s your invasion aspect that’s only exacerbated by the Neanderthal punchouts on ice.

2. Routine nightly spilling of blood on the ice seems like a barbaric practice. With thousands of fans cheering it on because it supposedly protects “their empire” you’ve got your mob mentality aspect.

3. Some of those NHL jerseys are hideous!

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 9:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds about wrong to me

1. The fighting is not uncivilized and primitive. Two men agree to fight whats wrong with that.

2. Tell me the last time blood was “routinely on the ice” and whats wrong with fans cheering it on. Since you hate fighting so much you should go complain at Bloody Elbow, instead of hockey fights which are nothing compared to MMA fights.

3. At least the NHL did not look like this:

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 11, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

1. Did you cut class when they were going over the teachings of MLK and Gandhi? This is the kind of foolish thinking that gets people killed and starts wars.

2. Look above- 4 fights in one night and no major outcry from the media or fans? If there were 4 fist fights in the NBA on one night, the league would be done. Banned from ESPN and would instantly lose much of its corporate fanbase.

MMA, boxing, etc are sports about fighting. FJ asked above (and has yet to get a rationale response) about why fighting is integral to a game where you’re supposed to get a puck in a net. This is getting repetitive.

3. Not sure what you’re trying to say here. Magic was one of the classiest on court players and a great face of the league for over a decade. Now he’s one of the most impressive entrepreneurs and role models in this country. I’m not saying he hasn’t made mistakes, but he’s a great ambassador for the game- aside from the fact that he’s a little painful to watch on TV as a hoops analyst!

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 5:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

1. Oh yeah one little hockey fights will lead to wars LOL

2. Again Hockey, Basketball two completely different sports, with different sets of rules.

Hockey is about fighting too.

3. I thought three was a joke one. Of course Johnson is a great player. I thought your #3 was a joke so i answered with a joke, see the short shorts?

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 11, 2008 9:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If there were 4 fist fights in the NBA on one night, the league would be done.

Sure, and if there were 4 fistfights in tennis in one night, or six fights on the golf course, or three fights in the hundred-meter breast stroke those would be out of place too. Sport seems the bigger classification here than race.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 12, 2008 6:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

3. Some of those NHL jerseys are hideous!

Said the Warriors fan.

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 11, 2008 9:04 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Watch it!

I like the Warriors jerseys! If only they brought back Thunder. Haha

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 9:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

my goodness

i’ve heard repeatedly in this thread that fighting in hockey is “ok” because it lets people “let off some steam” produced in the “heat of the game.” Also, that hockey’s fighting is not “malicious.” How would you know? How is that different from basketball players fighting? How are you judging what’s “in good nature” and whats not?

i liken this justification of white fighting with the whole vilification of rap music’s as making youth violent and misogynistic. funny how in reports of youth violence, video games and movies have influenced how youth have acted. Why the vilication of black masculinity, but white masculinity — using the same tools of guns and fists — is considered a no-no? hmm…

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 11, 2008 9:04 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

edit

but white masculinity — using the same tools of guns and fists — is considered a [edit no-no?] just boys being boys hmm…

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 11, 2008 9:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I personally think that if you outlawed fighting in hockey, it would:

1) still happen;

2) more people would slash and cheap shot other players.

Look at the last Kings’ game. John Zeiler of the Kings boarded Adam Foote of the Avalanche earlier in the season and earned a 3-game suspension. (Foote is still out with a back injury as a result of the incident.) At the beginning of the game, Ian Laperriere of the Avalanche lined up opposite Zeiler and then the two of them dropped the gloves when the play started. The threw each other around for a little bit and then sat in the box for 5 minutes. There, it’s over. No one else got hurt, no one tried to knee anyone, and the Avalanche proceeded to blow the Kings up.

Hockey is a very emotional sport, and the players often make poor decisions when their blood is up. Hockey helps defuse that emotion and helps prevent injuries. Plus, it’s cool.

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 11, 2008 9:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i'm not saying hockey is bad sport

but your insinuating that basketball is less emotional and that “poor decisions” like fighting should never happen, or if it does, its considered even worse than any other fighting in professional sports.

someone mentioned earlier that fighting is a form of showing support for your teammate. okay, that’s fair. it’s fair in baseball isn’t it? benches clear, we think it’s exciting. but when benches clear in basketball, UH OH!!!!! time to start fining people.

i actually find hockey to be an interesting sport. i wish i could fly around on ice like they could. in fact, living in michigan, i can see why hockey is the more popular than basketball and football. this iisn’t about why hockey is good or bad, its more why we legitimize fighting when its white players versus when its black basketball players.

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 11, 2008 11:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

also

why DOESN’T fighting exist in basketball? why isn’t it made a rule? if people get emotional, why not let em duke it out, throw em in the penalty box?

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 11, 2008 11:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d say basketball isn’t quite as emotional as hockey because there’s not that much physical contact. Guys bump into one another, but you fouls are called a lot more, which kind of settles things down. I don’t know why people freak out when basketball players fight, especially because it’s always embarrassing, but I think race has a bit to do with it. Atma and I are on the same page about the double standard, we differ on whether fighting is necessary or not.

The biggest problem with allowing fighting in basketball is that most people don’t know how to fight so someone would get hurt in a sport where guys can square their feet and deliver serious blows, and because you have to wait until a stop in the action to insert new players. That’s really why hockey can get away with fighting; goons can get on the ice and fight without making it look like a deliberate act. If fouled Lebron hard and then some big goon immediately entered the game, it would look staged.

And I love basketball, but they’re not really fighters. Hockey players are the types of guys that would probably get into a fight in everyday life at a bar or something (and that’s usually how hockey players get into trouble with the law), while basketball players are kinda… whimps, I guess. I mean seriously, can you imagine Manu Ginobili throwing anything but a limp wrist at another player?

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 11, 2008 12:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Huh?
Hockey players are the types of guys that would probably get into a fight in everyday life at a bar

If what you’re saying is true (and I don’t buy it since you haven’t given any evidence to show that it’s true), then hockey players seems like a bunch of violent bums who should be behind bars instead of getting big contracts to dance around on the ice and get cheered on.

I don’t buy that there’s isn’t enough physical contact in the NBA to stir up player’s emotions or that it isn’t as emotional as hockey. Where’s the evidence?

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 5:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

in hockey players are the ones that fight in everyday life at a bar

then I guess we should forgive Pacman Jones, Stephen Jackson, Burress et al?

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 12, 2008 7:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

that would be scary

7 foot guys slugging it out. plus when your on the ice you can’t use your full weight to throw punches.

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 11, 2008 3:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

uh oh

here’s the friend to the rescue.
Quite sickening, really.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on Dec 11, 2008 10:54 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How are you judging what’s "in good nature" and whats not?

Because respected enforcers like the aformentioned Laraque often pat each other on the back after a fight, and are known as some of the classiest and most fan friendly players in the NHL.

The Ducks enforcer plays an average of 5 mins a game, yet on any given night, you’ll probably see just as many fans wearing his jersey as the teams MVP/hall of fame captain. Enforcers are often some of the smartest guys in hockey, because they figured out a long time ago that they didn’t have the skills to make it in the NHL, and had to adapt to fill a niche in the sport. Ducks current enforcer is a Princeton Econ grad, who donates his hair to cancer patients. Some of Ducks previous enforcers are law school grads who write children’s books, and in interviews have said that the respect among enforcers/fighters in the NHL are indicative of the nature of why they fight in the first place – to stand up for their teammates, and not as an overt gesture of hate or aggression. The latter being the reason why NBA/MLB/NFL fights usually occur.

Don't bRuin your life. Make love with a Trojan

by Morbo on Dec 11, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

interesting

i didn’t know that about the ‘enforcers’ but that’s an interesting point worth adding to the discourse. but sometimes people fight in the NBA to stand up for teammates as well. i mean, whenever one dude gets into it, everyone else mobs. same goes for baseball, people mob. its not necessarily about hate or aggression. magic and isiah were best friends (so they say) but would get into it. people are angry over hard fouls, not because they hate each other.

to say its just say (not you but responding to guy below you) its part of the “culture” of the Hockey, you have to wonder why it isn’t part of the culture of basketball. just because its not a rule? then why ISN’T it a rule? why are bench clearing brawls OK in baseball. we’re not just talking about what’s ‘legal’ and whats not. its why is it that fighting in basketball — at all — is stigmatized, when Atma has outlined that it happens so rarely. Why is fighting in baseball not as looked down upon? Why is it that we feel like we need to vilify fighting in basketball, when other sports [baseball] tend to get the pass?

in responding to the R I O T, i mean, out of all the players in the NBA, how many are having legal problems in comparison to the total number of actual players and coaches? And what about the NFL? I think the ratios are pretty tiny. I’m not denying the NBA has had issues with some of its players (some of them i i think are unfairly vilified, but some of them are just plain stupid), but i’m also suggesting that there’s a weird way that basketball as a professional and commodified sport has specific set of rules regarding the conduct of its players.

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 11, 2008 4:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: why DOESN’T fighting exist in basketball?

It’s the sports culture…

The NBA does not allow it.

The NHL allows it, to a point. (which is why it’s not "barbaric")

I can’t blame Stern, though. The NBA has an image problem. It suffers from countless (major) off-court issues. (Remember the good old “Jail Blazers” team?)

This kind of stuff just isn’t happening in the NHL. There is not the volume of arrests and nowhere near a similar number of legal problems.

Also, it isn’t as the NHL gets a “pass” for unacceptable violent moments on the ice. The Todd Bertuzzi attack on Steve Moore stirred up huge headlines across the country similar to that of the brawl in Auburn Hills. Right after, people didn’t hesitate to call Bertuzzi, who happens to be white, a “thug”.

The bottom line, this idea that the NHL is getting a “pass” because it’s a “white league” is bull shit…

by R I O T on Dec 11, 2008 2:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I can’t blame Stern, though. The NBA has an image problem. It suffers from countless (major) off-court issues. (Remember the good old "Jail Blazers" team?)

Countless and major is way to strong. Like Fuzzy said- let’s look at the percentages across the entire NBA.

This kind of stuff just isn’t happening in the NHL. There is not the volume of arrests and nowhere near a similar number of legal problems.

That’s not a perfect metric even if it was the case- which at this point is all hypothetical without any real data. Countless research has been done that clearly demonstrates the racial bias in law enforcement in this country.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 5:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Countless research has been done that clearly demonstrates the racial bias in law enforcement in this country.

Let’s do some research on this topic, then. Instead of using hockey as basketball’s reference point, list out all the sports that don’t tolerate fighting and then put a checkmark next to the ones that are predominantly black. It seems to me if the notion is that race is dictating fight culture in these sports, there should be some correlation, no?

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 12, 2008 6:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i brought up baseball earlier

of course no one has actually responded to it. hmm.

baseball has a pretty wide range of players. white, black, afro-diasporic, latin-carribean, south American, Asian, etc. Fighting is pretty rare, except during those heated series where people start throwing balls at people’s heads and torsos. Then the subsequent bench clearing brawl.

baseball is “America’s” sport and in spite of it’s current diversity in professional sports, its “racial” character can come to mean ‘white’ in various ways. take for example qualifying format changes to the little world series in 1997 that has now made it more difficult for teams like Taiwan to throttle “America’s” young talent. In response to Taiwan little league teams winning something to the effect of 17 little league world series titles between the years of 1975 and 1995, its pretty clear to me, and to journalists writing about this, that the new changes were to protect the the national character of the game. Though the national character of the game is not overtly racialized, its pretty clear from watching the little league world series how we associated it in the U.S. with white kids. of course this isn’t how it actually is all across the country, but what i’m saying is that the little league world series is supposed to represent America’s dominance of the game on a global scale, and it ends up getting represented by white people.

just because a bunch of different people play the game around the world and possibly play it professionally in the U.S., doesn’t mean that they aren’t pre-existing ideas that the sport is ‘white’ or ‘black’ (i.e. espn ran an article a few years back when hansborough, mcroberts, and adam morrison were tearing up the NCAA bball, citing how white athletes felt unfairly treated like outsiders to a ‘black’ game). i mean, how many times have you heard someone make a joke/comment about black people being good at basketball or how boring baseball is because it’s “white”?

So, i’m saying that we can’t just look at the racial make up (though it plays a huge role in my mind), but we got to also think about how these sports are embedded in larger ideas of what “America” is. basketball doesn’t represent “America” the ways baseball has with or without all the historical legacies of baseball.

by dj fuzzylogic on Dec 12, 2008 7:37 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I don’t think race is the reason for such contrasting images of the sport and people who play it. I think an obvious example is boxing (where fighting is part of the game, just like hockey), which has a heavy population of african american athletes. This, by your definition, is a barbaric sport (I don’t men to put words in your mouth). Is this profession demonized and criminalized? Not on a nightly basis like the NBA is.

I think the reason is that boxing is not popular, just like the NHL. The NBA has deals with ESPN, TNT, and ABC and all of its superstars are marketed by the biggest shoe companies and clothing lines. These guys are like movie stars, their faces are all over the place. So, to use and exaggerated example, this is much like movie stars being shown in tabloids. Is it national news when you have a couple too many brews and end up doing something stupid, no, but it is when a A-list star does. Why…Popularity.

I think the reason why the NBA is labeled as “Thug” is a horrible stereotype, but I don’t think it happens because of race, it happens because basketball is simply MUCH more popular than the NHL.

Playoffs!!??

by PAWarrior on Dec 11, 2008 8:04 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting take

I’m sure popularity and the face time/ recognizability of NBA players IS in indeed a factor in why the NBA can’t get away with fighting like the NHL, although it’s not a good explanation for the “thug” stereotyping of the association. Let’s not forget that the MLB (with “boys are being boys” brawls) and NFL (more push/ shove fighting in 1 game than you’ll find in years of NBA action) are much more popular, yet out of the 3 the NBA gets the thug stereotype.

It looks like your argument (correct me if I’m misinterpreting it): NBA → Popular → Thug

But that just doesn’t hold in the movie star example you’re throwing out. When was the last time you heard someone say “movie stars are thugs”? I bet the odds are much less than you’ve heard someone say the NBA is a thug league.

When was the last time you heard someone say the NHL is a thug league? (which it undoubtedly is and many of its fans seem to enjoy as evidenced by the postings here from the hockey fandom)

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 9:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Like you said you know nothing about hockey.

If any one should be complaining it should be the players. Do you have any Idea what kind of caliber hockey players are? When they have a Microphone in their face they sound like they would rather be eating rocks. I love hockey players. All they care about is the game.

Then you got Captain Jack mouthing off to the refs all day long. Hockey players figure it out on the Ice.


patrick marleau played his next shift after bleeding all over the Ice.


Hockey players dont play for their health. They know what they are getting themselves into. They play hockey and they play to win with complete disregard for thier own safety. Dont speak of what you dont go.

 

by Fozz on Dec 11, 2008 8:48 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Great!

Hockey players are tough. No one’s disputing that. Moving on…

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 11, 2008 8:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

.................................

I am talking about players attitudes, how they present themselves and the actions you hear about on and off the court. Hockey players are tough with little care for fame. They play for the game. NBA players are portrayed as thugs because they act like it. Kobe being a selfish little girl 2 seasons ago, Kobe rape case. (he has redeemed himself) Players firing guns in the air, drugs, and basketball players with huge egos.

by Fozz on Dec 12, 2008 3:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And what was the result of that case? Funny how the court of law gives way to the court of public opinion when it comes to determining a player’s legacy, though one is a lot less biased than the other.

The huge egos is purely subjective. When the media doesn’t have any real dirty laundry to expose, they make their own. The thought that most or all basketball players have huge egos is one of those media created stories. Maybe most do, but the evidence presented in the media’s cause is often faulty at best. See: Marbury, Stephon.

The drugs or firing guns in the air seems like a good argument at face value, until you remember that for one thing there is a large discrepancy percentage of players involved in those activities versus the amount of coverage players get in those activities. And for another thing there are massive underlying socioeconomic causes behind the actions of those few players. I would elaborate but only if it isn’t clear.

by belilaugh on Dec 12, 2008 3:26 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Laraque vs. Brashear — 10/20/07

The rematch — two months later

I don’t know if this contributes much at all, but these guys are getting cheered quite a bit.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Dec 12, 2008 7:32 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Are you kidding me with this?

You should check out the ratings between the NBA and NHL. Don’t look now, but the NHL is making an incredible climb and soon will overtake the NBA as the #3 sport.

Hockey is twenty times more exciting that the NBA ever will be. You can skip 90% of an NBA game and still catch all the good parts. When I watch an NBA game, I see very little passion. The NBA trophy is also a joke (but it sure is cute!).

People who don’t understand the NHL are too stupid to learn the game. They can’t follow something that fast and thus brush it aside.

by themerve on Dec 12, 2008 12:46 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is getting old

No one’s arguing whether the NHL or NBA is more exciting or whether the NHL will overtake the NBA (where’s your evidence by the way?).

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 12, 2008 6:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would just like to say

that for anyone who makes the argument

“I don’t think racism is the reason for this, I think that _ instead”

why can’t both factors be present? Why is it an either/or situation?

by belilaugh on Dec 12, 2008 3:32 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

This is very true

Racist double standards, portrayals, and expectations don’t wholly account for everything and there’s some other good factors that the hockey fans have brought up here (no pads, popularity, etc) which I find very interesting, but to deny any influence of race here is just narrow minded.

If I were to turn this into some regression equation to explain why the NHL gets a free pass for it’s nightly barbarism while the NBA gets ridiculous censure for it’s rare weak slap fights, the biggest significant explanatory variable would be race, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t other elements in this equation.

But what can you do my man? Half of the commenters here don’t even grasp the points being made and have tried to turn it into some silly “NHL players are tough” “but there’s some minority players in the NHL” “the NHL is not racist” debate, which no one is even contending.

Talking about race is hard. Talking about race in sports is even more difficult because a lot of folks just want to zone out and escape from societal realities.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 12, 2008 6:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We basically agree except I think you’re comparing basketball to the wrong sport. The part of hockey you’re discussing is much more comparable to boxing or the UFC than basketball. The hockey that Sidney Crosby plays is much different than the hockey that George Laraque plays and I don’t think you know that because you admittedly haven’t watched much hockey. Compare basketball to a sport like baseball or soccer and you have a much better case.

And to be fair, I don’t know how you can say, “The NHL is an absolutely barbaric league that gets a pass for its thuggery because of the racial makeup of both its players and fans,” and then act surprised when people get defensive.

The West Coast is the Best Coast.

by RudyKelly on Dec 12, 2008 8:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We basically agree except I think you’re comparing basketball to the wrong sport. The part of hockey you’re discussing is much more comparable to boxing or the UFC than basketball. The hockey that Sidney Crosby plays is much different than the hockey that George Laraque plays and I don’t think you know that because you admittedly haven’t watched much hockey. Compare basketball to a sport like baseball or soccer and you have a much better case.

I’m with you that there is also a double standard between the NBA and MLB, but for you to try to segment the NHL into artificial thuggery and non-thuggery lines does nothing to address to points we’ve been outlining. We can segment the NBA into rough-housers and softies too. What’s key is to examine the perceptions of the leagues at the macro levels as belilaugh has so eloquently explained.

And to be fair, I don’t know how you can say, "The NHL is an absolutely barbaric league that gets a pass for its thuggery because of the racial makeup of both its players and fans," and then act surprised when people get defensive.

I’ve enjoyed this discussion immensely and I’ve learned a lot very quickly about hockey. There’s no surprise about people having very different passionate views on the topic. BUT there is tremendous surprise on the poor reading comprehension skills put on display here by the visiting hockey fans.

Like I said:
Half of the commenters here don’t even grasp the points being made and have tried to turn it into some silly "NHL players are tough" "but there’s some minority players in the NHL" "the NHL is not racist" debate, which no one is even contending.

It’s pretty embarrassing to see people putting up these straw man’s and posting silly comments and arguments that have nothing to do with anything people are discussing. All these weak lobs “he’s a racist” without any rationale or evidence are absolutely foolish.

It’s also funny to see you take some sort of moral high ground after your recent post on Battle of California (Parros-Shelley: Manly Men Doing Manly Things) where you:

  • glorified the inane fighting in the NHL which does nothing to disprove my claims that the NHL is an absolutely barbaric league with bloodthirsty fans that gets a pass for its thuggery
  • immaturely called people at Golden State of Mind “pussies”

Real classy. It’s no wonder we’ve had to sift through so much garbage and low IQ comments in this thread from the visiting commenters from Battle of California and Fear the Fin. You’re making your community and league look bad. Good job. Meanwhile we’re trying to get a good discussion going over here which for the most part has been excellent.

Hoops fans 1, Hockey fans 0

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 13, 2008 12:18 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Atma

thanks for re-directing this discussion back to the core issue:

the unfair portrayal of the sports we love.

i am a lifelong hockey fan, i went to college in canada, and those people love that game more then most american sports fans love anything. they articulate the history and passion and skill involved with that game in ways i can not.

therefore it is difficult for me not to try and explain the sport i have examined, discussed, and loved for years, ESPECIALLY when i sense an unfair misrepresentation of that game.

BUT

the issue is not the merit in our prospective sports.

the issue is how our beloved games are portrayed to people who only have passing knowledge of them.

the issue
is about the perception of race and its role on the perception of 2 very different sports.

the major sports media, which is by far the greatest source of our information regarding these 2 sports, is the heart of this discussion. i think it helpful to find the common link between the 2 sports in the MSM’s coverage of them. that is:

hockey has it, whether you believe it is a valid aspect of the sport or not; it is within the current rules of the game. it is a common and expected occurrence.

basketball very very rarely is violent. violence is for the most part against the rules and is also very unexpected.

Sports media, as does all major media, needs to attract audience. VIOLENCE draws a crowd. from our days on the playground when two kids would fight over a girl to a nasty car wreck that slows traffic in all directions, something in a lot of people is fascinated by VIOLENCE.

this truth is capitalized on by the media,
in BB by playing to people’s (mostly WRONG) fears and (mostly WRONG) suspicions that BLACK PEOPLE are violent and thuggish.
in Hockey by only tuning in when a particularly bloody fight (most NHL fights are not much more than grappling matches) or heinous incident (a la chris simon).

i really appreciated everyones incite so far, i think we can all agree that our favorite pass-times are poorly and often unfairly portrayed.

LONG LIVE SPORT.

by denver_diaspora on Dec 16, 2008 10:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said

I agree with most of that but VIOLENCE is not the main part of hockey. It is a part of hockey

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 17, 2008 10:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

http://sharks.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?catid=-6&id=28076

Everything you said was racist. If you don’t follow a sport or know what’s going on with that sport stay out of it.

“Race-baiting” is despicable. I’ve never commented here, but I’ve been a reader for about sixteen months.

I’m never coming back.

by Jumbo Whoah on Dec 12, 2008 6:19 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

There's no "race-baiting" here

But there is a great discussion of race, media, and sports in this country that you’re unfortunately missing.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 12, 2008 6:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Everything you said was racist.

couldn’t agree more

by mattman on Dec 12, 2008 7:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How is hockey racist?

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 12, 2008 7:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

You really don't even want to try and talk to this guy,

he just doesn’t get it because he doesn’t understand hockey.

by mattman on Dec 12, 2008 8:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

You tell me. You’re the hockey fan. Not one comment here has made the claim that hockey itself is racist.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 13, 2008 12:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You are a fool. First you call hockey barbaric, then you say the racial makeup of the league and the fan base is the only reason it gets a pass. Then you say the NBA is unfairly targeted and criticized.

Ignore this fool, and ignore this blog.

by pj48 on Dec 13, 2008 8:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Just removed GSOM link from my blog, I in no way want to be affiliated with this moron.

by pj48 on Dec 13, 2008 8:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

First you call hockey barbaric,

That has yet to be disproven. It has only been supported in this thread by NHL fans alike and even the glorification of thuggery on Battle of California, which is one of the top hockey blogs around.

then you say the racial makeup of the league and the fan base is the only reason it gets a pass

See the comments above this. I did not say it is the ONLY reason it gets a pass. I said it’s a strong significant contributing factor, which several others have supported. That’s a critique of the racial landscape of the sport fueled by the social politics in this country.

Then you say the NBA is unfairly targeted and criticized.

I think we’ve given ample evidence in this thread why this is true.

Glad to see you won’t be posting here. Not much is added to an interesting debate when someone has to resort to “you’re a fool” and “you’re a moron” tactics because they can’t muster up anything intelligent to say.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 13, 2008 10:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

haha

you’re funny.

Hockey fans 999999 Hoops fans 1/2

even the basketball fans are on the right side

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 13, 2008 10:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I have another question

Why did you post this if you are unwilling to change your opinion? This post only promotes chaos. What good did you expect to come out of this when you posted it?

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 13, 2008 10:55 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

oh and also

Is golf a racist sport?

"Gotta suck for the other teams. You finally catch the Sharks on an off night and you still lose." -Shark Man

by idunno723 on Dec 13, 2008 10:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It doesn’t look like you’ve actually read the comments in this thread. Please do so before commenting. Thanks.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 13, 2008 11:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Again

No one said the NHL is an inherently racist league or sport.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 13, 2008 11:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If this isn't calling hockey racist, I don't know what is.
The NHL is an absolutely barbaric league that gets a pass for its thuggery because of the racial makeup of both its players and fans in stark contrast to the unfairly targeted and criminalized NBA

by mattman on Dec 14, 2008 11:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Then you really don’t know what racism is and your reading comprehension skills need some work.

by Atma Brother ONE on Dec 15, 2008 10:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This

is ridiculous.

by Djkling15 on Dec 15, 2008 12:48 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

A hockey blog just posted the same topic:

http://uisjmcmorgan.blogspot.com/2008/12/punch-is-punch.html

and in another blog:

http://harrisonexists.blogspot.com/2007/03/artifacts-of-racism-archeaology-of.html

Maybe this will have a little more perspective?

by Djkling15 on Dec 16, 2008 12:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Alright, I got a question. Is fighting in hockey a part of the game or not?

Because if it is, and violent assaults like Bertuzzi’s occur, then wouldn’t that give Atma’s statements that hockey is barbaric credibility?

And if it isn’t then I don’t see how the racial aspect of the issue can be denied.

by belilaugh on Dec 16, 2008 10:02 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

good point...

but i truly believe this has more to do with VIOLENCE than with RACE.

Major Sports Media sells violence.
the game of basketball is not violent, so you can’t sell that, but there is a perception that basketball players are violent. i believe that this perception is usually false, although sometimes legitimized by the actions of a VOCAL MINORITY of NBA players. so the violent aspect here, “basketball thugs” is capitalized on.
the game of hockey, on the other hand, IS violent. Hockey is a game with a long and rich history of violence as a part of the sport. guys fight, hit, and shove, all within the good graces of the rulebook. so the violent aspect here, fights and hits, is capitalized on.

where we can overcome this is educating ourselves as to what is truly involved here. i know not all basketball players are violent gun-slinging thugs. some are. deal with it. what is violent and wrong in the game has more to do with selfish individuals breaking the rules then with a problem intrinsic to the game itself.

fighting is a sport that goes way way back, like pre-history old. it is a classic battle that allows two men to test muscle and mind against one-another. it is a pure sport, in many ways. that this pure sport became a part of hockey is due in part to the long history of the game, when the sensitivity training and kum-bye-ya everyone gets a trophy attitude had yet to pervade competitive sports. as the game has evolved the nature of the rules have been built to preserve the pure sport while allowing two grown men to choose to play within the rules, which are designed to maximize and balance entertainment (an undeniable purpose of professional sports) as well as safety for athletes.
some guys are a detriment to the Nhl. as an example, Sean Avery has a history of selfishly breaking the rules.
what is barbaric and wrong in the game has more to do with selfish individuals breaking the rules then with a problem intrinsic to the game itself.

just my experience and education.

by denver_diaspora on Dec 16, 2008 10:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of points brought up, but really, all I asked was the question I posed.

Because even if it is a minority of people in the NHL who are selfish individuals breaking the rules, if fighting is part of the game then the game is fostering their ruthless play.

And if it is not a part of the game, then why is it more accepted than basketball fighting, which you agreed is not violent and does not condone fighting?

Either way something’s up.

by belilaugh on Dec 16, 2008 11:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

something's up?

like a conspiracy? i dont want to put words in your mouth so i want to assume you just mean that a cultural bias is possibly at work here. not that the league admin is in cahoots with the media with an evil plan to make blacks look like violent maniacs while shrugging off white guys pummeling each other.

i would argue that yes, as much as dunking is an unnecessary but entertaining aspect of the game of basketball, so is fighting an unnecessary aspect of hockey.

could we argue that because you can score points in basketball without jumping off the court and slamming the ball into the hoop that it is just indicative of black people wanting to showboat and have the limelight? i think that if anything, the NBA has more of a rep of being a prima donna league, the 1 or 2 stars per team are focused on with a second class of players who exist to pass and guard while the stars make amazing plays.

if fighting in hockey is “barbaric” (terribly loaded word, not really helpful for an open discussion) than we can also say that dunking in basketball is egomaniacal.
both barbarism and egomaniasm are character flaws, not culturally acceptable, and not helpful to the sports we love.
should we eliminate all unnecessary aspects of our sports? what about a literal coin toss in football? what a waste of time why not just have the computer sort it out at random as the schedule is made.
what about the 7th inning stretch? messes up the flow keep the game rolling, who watches 6 hours of baseball anyways?

you see, these flavors of our sports are things built in from their inception. the traditions and history are what make the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL quite wonderful and unique from say the arena football league, or Roller Hockey International. correct me if i am wrong, but basketball was not always a sport predominantly played pro by black athletes. did the league allow fighting then?
hockey has always controlled but allowed fighting. basketball never has.

will people read into this many different things? yeah, some do. is that perception the truth of the situation? i do not believe so.
please do not perpetuate racial division by creating arguments that only exist in perception

by denver_diaspora on Dec 17, 2008 8:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

We_re_back__small
Terms of Service and Moderation on GSoM...
Small
Five Good Things So Far
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
The Warriors as Simpsons
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Live-Tweeting from Row 8!!! (GSoM's Charity Auction seats)

Recent FanPosts

Photo-225x300_small
On Mikki Moore, Anthony Randolph, and 'Done' Nelson
Oaklandathletics_small
facebook Members: Keep the A's in OAKLAND
Small
They're bad
Clipsnation_small
Attention SoCal Dubs Fans
Small
Why Wright's injury could help the team
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Need extras in a basketball-related Doritos commercial
Small
Time to get someone to listen (ala Cleveland Browns)
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
New Warriors logo
Chuck_norris_small
Should we try to get Brand?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GSoM Motto

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview