a.what do k love and fuller have in common besides the fact that they're white centers? k love, while he is limited athletically, has an amazing skill set. he would be a great backup to biedrins. he'd be the best passing big man in the league, he can shoot, execute the pick and pop, create his own shot, you name it. i'd be hella juiced if we landed him. we could have a front court rotation of biedrins, harrington, wright, and love. that's kinda money.

b. lemme go a bit further with my case for westbrook. he's more than just monta without the jumpshot. first, he's a much better defender than monta. his shot's improving...he would be a bit redundant on this team, but he would be a helluva bench player, and that's basically what the warriors need, more depth on the bench, considering barnes and pietrus will be gone after this year. we could use some more swingmen, westbrook fits, and he's getting much better every year, kinda like monta. nbadraft.net has westrbook going 10 over all.

c. no, collison is not a consistent scorer, but he's a great spot up shooter (over 40% from 3 pointers), he runs a 4.1 (look it up. it's true. he's quicker and faster than monta. great ball handler. great in the half court offense. he'd just be a great backup poitn guard for us. he'd be our jordan farmar, but better.

d. yes, i was joking about mata. but he's still NASTY.

i think the warriors are settling into their starting lineup for the next few years. assuming biedrins and monta get signed, baron comes back, our only position that's somewhat up in the air in the 4, but i'm pleased with harrington and wright. so we just need to improve on the bench. look at the lakers, they're 10 deep. next year, we'll be 6 or 7 deep.

recent ucla draftees have been good bench players (farmar, afflalo). they're well coached, play hard defense, sink their shots, know their roll. we could use players like that on this team.