Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

How about some love for MP?

Why the hate? Look, the guy runs baseline to baseline every minute he's in, he's asked to play out of position at power forward and guard premier perimiter players. He increases the team speed and defensive rotation and he rebounds well for his size. He never takes a play off and is one of the only players on the team with a gnuine defensive mindset. Until this year, he was a fairly reliable threepoint shooter and had a good FG%. And he doesn't turn the ball over as much you think. His career plus-minus is good (and it roughly the same as fans'' darling Barnes' this year.) So why is it you know-it-alls think you can comment on his basketball IQ? Because...

There is always someone like that with Warrior fans. Someone who all armchair coaches feel is stupid and is responsible for losses. And because most of you are unoriginal, you'll just pile-on without looking closely at the game.  

I remember when Warrior fans used to boo Tim Hardaway because they said he shot too much. Called him "Shootaway" during the games. Hardaway then bad mouthed the no-nothing hater Warrior fans. Timmy was an All-Star and he took crap from Warrior fans? Typical. Don't pretend you don't know about it. You know who you are. They sounded a lot like you Pietrus haters sound now.

Then there was Tyrone Hill. Hated like a mother-f... becuase he was a crude undersized center, a grinder and not a slick offenive player like the W's fans love. But Tyrone was a top-10 performer in rebound rate for us even though he was playing up a position (like Pietrus is now). By the way, Hill was all-star power forward after he left us for Cleveland. Wonder what happened? Prodcution per minute was the same...maybe he wasn't all that bad.

I've seen it a million times. The guys that Warriors fans get wood over -- Barnes, Azubuike, Tony Farmer, Brian Cardinal, David Wood, Keith Jennings. Man, I could fill A phone book with all the mediocre players that Warrior fans fall in love with. Suckers.

Warrior fans have always hated on the wrong guys. Maybe because they listened to Jim Barnett (who never played any defense when he was a player) and that blowhard Bob Fitzgerald (never even played basketball at all). Barett and Fitzgereald's drooling all over themsleves over Dunleavy for years should have exposed them as unquialified. Maybe fans they think they know it all because they, like all fans, like the sound of their own voice.

Listen, y'all, Nellie likes Pietrus, Van Gundy likes Pietrus, Riley likes Pietris, Scouts like Pietrus, the Laker announcers think Peitrus is good. But some idiot 12 year old with a computer in their mothers' house thinks he's a bonehead and everyone believes him. Whatever.

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

Comment 66 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

what ?
how many credentials does somebody need to have to recognize that Pietrus makes mistakes that can't be excused. He is a terrible dribbler, and he steps out of bounds all the time with the ball, do I need to run a 5 star basketball camp and be a member of the basketball hall of fame to recongize that Pietrus hasn't worked on his game as much as he should have? honestly, he has the same skillset he had when he first came into the league. with that said, there are positives about him, and they all come from the defensive end when he isn't picking up silly fouls. out of all the warriors, he's the best at masquerading as a power foward even though he's a wing.

by bigbenny11 on Feb 27, 2008 3:46 PM PST reply actions  

wow?
the whole basis of your argument is we love barnes.

sorry fella.. barnes has also been blacklisted now. He's not exactly a fan favorite anymore not the way he's been playing recently.

and I find it funny that you say Nellie likes him but Nellie also only plays Pietrus like 6 minutes a night before Biedins got injured.

You also forgot to mention that Pietrus ASKED to be traded. You are saying Pietrus reads our blogs and he wants to leave because of that or maybe its because Nellie doesn't like or trust Pietrus as much as you say? Is Nellie one of those boneheads who don't appreciate Pietrus?

you yourself sound like a angry know it all trying to educate us "boneheads." Maybe you are the one living in mommy's basement?  

by saintdee on Feb 27, 2008 3:47 PM PST reply actions  

you have the power to blacklist Warrior players?
In what capacity, exactly, do you blacklist players? Blacklisted from what?

Much I admire your self-importance, Silly rabbit, I didn't make any presumption that you or other fans were the reason that Pietrus wants to be traded. My point is that he's been asked to play out of position which he has done pretty admirably. Nelson's system always sacrificices a forward in order to make the smaller players more effective. My example about Tyrone Hill is worth reexamining. Hill was getting killed as a power forward playing center and looked overmatched. Fans couldn't stand the sight of him even though he did pretty well all things considered. He left the Dubs, played his natural PF position and was an all-star. Worth considering, no?

And, I submit that his turnover numbers are not that bad. Certainly not as bad as someone who gets singled out every minute for constantly making silly turnivers. Buke's and Barnes per-minute TO's are comparable. I believe that you and others simply magnify his mistakes irrationally. Just the other day I read someone blaming Pietrus for Jackson having a three point shot blocked. And Peitrus' didn't even make the direct pass to Jackson! Stuff like that is stupid.

Look, I don't think Pietrus is world-beater and surely he could be better, but he's not the problem you make him out to be. Just trying to play it straight.

by Dubmanny on Feb 27, 2008 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Good point, but
I think the real reason why we hate on MP is because he was drafted as an athletic slashing "air france" player. He has not shown or used most of the weapons he was drafted for. Instead he stays outside the Three point line and never really takes advantage and uses what got him drafted to begin with. I'll admitt, a lot has to do with the Dubs playing him out of position and how the coaches utalize him (kind of like Harrington), but MP is the one on the court and he is the one that decides to shoot a three or slash to the rim, rise and take it strong (Most of the time he shoots).
   His defense is good and he is one of our best, so I ease up on him for that, but again I think his lack of improving his offensive game and taking advantage of the skills that got him to the league is what is fustrating. Bukie and Barnes really had NO expectations, so anything from them was a surprise. MP is a surprise that we did not get the type of player that made the Dubs draft him so high.....but I get what you saying, he tries.

by ineemoney21 on Feb 27, 2008 3:51 PM PST reply actions  

We could have drafted
Kwame Brown with the first pick, or Michael Olowakandi

by mightymadskillz on Feb 27, 2008 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

asf
ok when someone makes the same mistakes, and the same really stupid mistakes i.e. step out of bounds with a pivot foot, lift his foot before he dribbles, and turn the ball over in other ways, it gets irritating. to add to that, hes been doing it for a couple years now

he isnt fixing these flaws and they are middle school mistakes.

he also has a very very low basketball i.q. if he wasnt athletic, i dont think he would have anything going for him. that may sound dumb, but for example croshere is not athletic yet he knows what to do and where to be. i think you saw him last night

and also im disgusted with barnes. he was great in the playoffs and thats why many still like him. but thats wearing off  so that point of yours is also invalid.

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 4:03 PM PST reply actions  

dont be too sure
that Croshere isnt athletic. He doesnt look it, but hes pretty quick, and he can get up and dunk it pretty nicely.

by ilubthedubs on Feb 27, 2008 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

good point
he just looks so out of place sometimes

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

the foot out of bounds thing
..is becoming the stuff of legend at this point. Not killing anyone, but Buke has done it twice since Pietrus' last offense. This is a case of being told what to believe rather than simply observing. It's like getting some new wheels. As soon as you get that car you start to see all the other cars on the road just likes yours. Pietrus can go like 8 games wothout the foot out of bonds thing and then it happens and it's like to happens everytime he dribbles, Fitzgerela dn Barnett het hysterical and it's all ridiculous. Lazy observing on all our part, really.

Again, not saying Pietrus is an all-star or anything, just trying to keep it real.

by Dubmanny on Feb 27, 2008 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

ya well
i often mute the tv and listen to tim roye instead so you might not want to assume so much and build off your false thoughts.

what buike does as far as finshing at the rim, hustling, and not making STUPID decisions is more than acceptable as a bench player.

if there was a stat of the foot thing id be willing to bet that pietrus has done it more but i guess im not positive.

and that foot out of bounds thing was only one of the flaws of pietrus i mentioned, and azibuikes handling is far better that mickael as is his ability to not travel

so it look like bad assuming on your part, really.

Again, not saying Azubuike is an all-star or anything, just trying to keep it real

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

take your point but
There is a reason Buike makes $687,00 and had no other offers in the offesaon. He's a useful offensive player who can only guard the 2, and is shaky at that. He's a great value and helps in the boards, but if you think that any rotation that prominently features Kelenna Azabuike can contend for a title, you're mad.

It's simple, Pietrus gets playing time because he's more versatile that Kelenna defensively. He guards the 2,3,4 and sometimes even the point of attack -- the 1. Look Twelve Years, The Warriors problems are not on offense -- they lead the league in points scored. They will be fine on that end of the floor. The problem is they don't have a lot of versatile defenders. Or one that can play defensively above their natural positons.

Here it is in a nutshell. There are thousands of guys in the NBA and the D-League who can kind of do what Kelenna does. But NBA-level defenders at multiple positions are rare. Very rare.

Not that Pietrus or Barnes were particulalry coveted, but Pietrus had more interest that the other two combined because of his defensive versatility. I know he looks brutal sometimes, but look at the big picture, please.

by Dubmanny on Feb 27, 2008 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

hmm
well the warriors arent very defense minded if you havent noticed, and i thik kelenna fits in quite well.ill admit hes nowhere near starting status but i would simply take him over pietrus because of his awareness and lack of mistakes.

pietrus has overrated defense and he fouls more than the one-minute man used to. plus his offensive woes do not make up for his defense anyway.

on the other hand, kelenna can absolutely go off on offense, and his defense isnt atrocious. (did u see his block against j.r. smith's dunk attempt? NASTY). once again going back to the fact that we are an offensive team, kelenna is much more reliable.

i never said he should be prominently featured and i never said we're near a title so i duno where that came from. i would just pick him over pietrus any day. so if you think that any rotation that prominently features Mickael pietrus or kelenna Azubuike can contend for a title, you're mad

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

agree...sort of
I like Buke but 6'5" offensive minded 2 guards are about as easy to fill as anything on an NBA roster. Guys who can guard multiple positions are more coveted and tend to last loinger in the league. If Kelenna was so great on defense Nellie would call his number on perimeter isolation. He doesn't, Pietrus gets that assignment. When they have to leave someone on an island defensively, it's Pietrus, not Kelenna. And for every "nasty block" there are plenty of tyimes when they have to rotate help because Kelenna is getting abused by average 2 guards.

6'5' guys who can score a little a dime a dozen, I'm afraid. 6'5" guys who can score a little in Don Nelson's system are a dime a hundred. If he could play the point (can't), pass (can;t) or post up (again, can't) then he'd make more than the minimum. His game looks good and he can get on a roll. What keeps him around is his pittance salary and his good shooting percentage.

By the way, you'd be wiser to mention Buke's rebounding skills to make a case for him.

by Dubmanny on Feb 27, 2008 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

ok
i guess i can see what your saying about mickael's defense but you said nothing of the fouls. his stupid fouls lead to early bonus and kiling of the momentum.

players that make so many mistakes are not really a dime a dozen because they are on the bench or waived.

why nelson plays pietrus so much is a question me and everyone i talk to would truly like to know because i just dont get why he recieves so many extra chances. if  buike makes one, hes out. maybe nellie just plays favorties.

id say the rebounding is about equal because due to pietrus's athletecism, he can grab boards too. thats not really the issue or factor when deciding who is more skilled.

nellie does not put in players due to defensive productivity (Monta Ellis?) so if you think im the only one wondering why pietrus plays so much over not just kelenna but others, check out last nights thread.  

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

don't you think it's odd that FANS think Kelenna
is better, while NBA people think Pietrus is the more effective player? Whose expertise should we have more faith in when it comes to player evaluation, some random fans, or nellie & company?

I know Kelenna has the more polished game which tends to distract most fans. Since I don't think any fans are going to change their minds on who has been the more effective NBA player by discussion of each player's games', check out 82games.com (which bases stats on PER 100 POSSESSIONS).

Basically, Kelenna on the floor vs off the floor, the dubs have a -9 point differential. With Pietrus it's -3. You can also see how important Baron is +12.1 (and they are almost -8 when he's off the floor) and Andris who is 2nd on the team at +7.2.

It's not a statistical anomaly either b/c Azubuike's played 44% of the minutes and Pietrus 31%, so it's not the same as guys like Kosta, Belinelli or even CJ who've barely played and hence there is not much of a sample to pull from.

it's like Barkley says, most fans don't understand basketball, and even more so good basketball - that's why we think teams like the spurs are boring to watch. it's all about the highlight.

I really don't think either one is all that great (about 8-10 on most NBA depth charts), but we need one of these two or Barnes to step up and start hitting that corner 3 w/ some regularity in the name of floor spacing.

by the evil monkey on Feb 27, 2008 7:33 PM PST up reply actions  

who are these so called experts?
JVG - he has seen mp2 maybe 3 times a year?  LOL, he still thinks monta is under 6 ft.
Riley - even less mp2 exposure than JVG?
LA Laker announcers?  Please.  If I had to bet my life on their warriors info, you'd all get invitation to my wake by email tomorrow.  For two years I've had to endure their crappy warrior coverage, & I have laundry list of misinformation they've fed the LA public.

You lost me completely when you threw barkeley's entertaining, but idiotic a$$ in to make your point.  That dudes mouth has seen more feet the AF1's.

"To my dear brother, Noompsy."

by Tim N Chris Burger on Feb 27, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions  

nellie & colangelo are two of the most highly
respected talent evaluators especially at swing positions. uh... miami's GM is Randy Pfund, another well regarded evaluator of talent. I don't know what JVG has said on Pietrus, but that said, he may not know Monta's height, but he knows 100x more than you about basketball.

Typical fan, talking about commentators, I'm talking about GMs and scouts. Isn't it funny how HATE blinds ppl to the truth.

And all I'm saying about Barkley, is I bet you think the Spurs are boring.

Btw, stop being so butt hurt about this issue, it's getting old.

by the evil monkey on Feb 27, 2008 10:08 PM PST up reply actions  

JVG knows basket ball ...
but that doesn't necessarily make him a mikael pietrus expert.  Its like expecting the guy that designed the pants that you are wearing to know what's in your pockets.  Giving a guy an "expert's hat" doesn't magically make everything he says "truth".  It doesn't even guarantee that he's done his due diligence behind ever word he utters. Now if these experts you state say "Hey, I've studied his stats and watched hours of film on peitrus, and I believe he's gem" or "I've spent a lot of time watching his games" then color me wrong.  

Although I think its more like "I've seen him play a couple of times, and I don't know why he doesn't play more."  Hardly startling testimony if that's the case.

I'd just take the words of the regular people that watched him play 40+ games vs the expert that seen him play 2.

Oh and as for being butthurt - I wasn't the one calling out "fans" for not being "basketball smart".  I critique logic, you critique people.    

"To my dear brother, Noompsy."

by Tim N Chris Burger on Feb 27, 2008 11:56 PM PST up reply actions  

reading comprehension
um i included myself in fans.

um i never said anything about JVG on Pietrus. you brought him up.

critique logic? then do you understand the stats i gave you above.

you've refuted none of the evidence that suggests Pietrus may help the Warriors more than Azubuike.

you have the audacity to suggest that GMs like Coangelo & Pfund don't do their due diligence when obtaining a player by saying things like the experts have only seen 2 games while focusing on commentators like JVG. flat out, that is a SOPHISM.

hopefully you can admit to yourself that you might be too biased against Pietrus to judge him fairly.  either way, we're gonna need either him, Barnes, or Azubuike to start regularly hitting that corner 3 for the sake of floor spacing.

by the evil monkey on Feb 28, 2008 12:15 AM PST up reply actions  

asd
not everything shows up on the stat sheet. not the best answer but if you think that mickael pietrus is more productive and reliable than kelenna azubuike, and if you think the spurs are fun to watch....your insane.

i dont care what the numbers might say pietrus is unreliable and has a LOW basketball I.Q. im done with this rediculous arguement

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 10:19 PM PST up reply actions  

asd
asd
not everything shows up on the stat sheet. not the best answer but if you think that mickael pietrus is more productive and reliable than kelenna azubuike, you actually take into account what charles barkley says (HAHAHA!) ,  and if you think the spurs are fun to watch....your insane.

How does a more polished game distract fans. WTF are you on?! so youre saying when a player is better than another one it tends to make people think he is better than the other one?

"It's like Barkley says" haha priceless

i dont care what the numbers might say pietrus is unreliable and has a LOW basketball I.Q. im done with this rediculous arguement

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

asdf
i hit post before i was done on accident so that explains the 2 versions

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 10:25 PM PST up reply actions  

What is wrong w/ reading comprehension
you do realize i included myself in fans on the Spurs point. Sheesh, reread your post that i replied to. Now read my reply over again.

Anyway, we know that Nellie and other GMs value Pietrus more than Azubuike. Now instead of assuming they're idiots and we know all, THINK for once. Try to humble yourself and realize they know more about basketball than you do.

You obviously don't understand that stat or believe that it's pure coincidence that the Warriors suck when Azubuike plays and do incredible (by their standards) when he doesn't.

Sheesh. On the polished thing. Let me go to Layman's terms... Just b/c POB is more polished offensively than Dwight Howard doesn't mean he's more effective than him. Do you understand that?

We're fans, we value the highlight. That's why ESPN and that NFL show Red Zone or whatever you call it is so popular. I'm pretty sure most ppl don't even know what the Flex is in basketball.

by the evil monkey on Feb 27, 2008 11:37 PM PST up reply actions  

just to go further on the distract part...
using POB again as an example. we, as fans, get distracted by the novelty of his semi-sky hook or the fact that he can shoot a jump shot.

andris has none of this, but is 10x the player POB is. seriously, i have read posts here that POB would be better than andris if nellie would let him play. hopefully, i don't have to explain andris > pob.

simply put, in the NBA, it's better to be good to great at 1 or 2 things than be average at 5 or 6 different things.

by the evil monkey on Feb 27, 2008 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

jason
don't you think it's odd that FANS think Kelenna
is better, while NBA people think Pietrus is the more effective player? Whose expertise should we have more faith in when it comes to player evaluation, some random fans, or nellie & company?

If you look at the minutes played I would say that Nellie does prefer Buike. He has chosen to play him 300 more minutes this season.

Looking at all the standard per minute stats Buike is a better player in every aspect of the game other than defense. Defense is very important but the problem with MP is that while he has the ability to defend well he fouls at a rate that almost negates his good D (gets the other team in the bonus, slows the pace, gives up three point plays).  

I'll say this, MP's D keeps him in the conversation but he is not giving the team enough production in other areas. At least last season he was consistent from the corner. He would play good D and space the floor. This year it's always two dribbles left and a step back jumper that I've only seen him hit once or twice all year.

To be fair Buike's D kills his game. He needs to get much better, I have seen his man blow past him way too many times.

I've said this before, but it is funny that we as fans always compare these two players because Nellie doesn't play them at the same position.

by olympicmike on Feb 28, 2008 12:44 AM PST up reply actions  

good point, though just to somewhat defend
the other side, I was taking into consideration that Kelenna played a lot when Monta was struggling and we were w/o Jack.

Also Pietrus missed time due to the birth of his child and barely played when he had that broken nose. And, as you stated, Pietrus gets into foul trouble. though more so while playing the 4.

I'm actually a Kelenna supporter, but as I tried to understand Nellie's POV on Pietrus, I could see some of the reasons why Nellie has him in there. He's really a lot like Baron on defense. Able to guard multiple positions - so not a liability in pick & roll, willing to protect the rim, picks up steals (doesn't get the calls Baron gets), picks up charges, he doesn't double down as well, but isn't prone to the laziness that Baron sometimes suffers from from playing so many minutes. and unlike many of the warriors, he usually rotates defensively.

He hurts them offensively, but all Nellie wants is for that player to fill a lane on the break and shoot corner 3's in the half court so the fact that Buike can dribble better than him isn't that big of a deal.

Yeah, i really think Nellie views Kelenna as a 2. He's not long enough to guard 3's who tend to be around Joe Johnson's size (Carmelo, Prince, Pierce, Odom, Granger, Peja, Marion for example). Unfortunately, Monta and Baron get the bulk of the minutes at 2 now and Kelenna is the odd man out.

I thought when they brought in Webber that it'd be a let Baron rest squad of
CJ
Kelenna
Pietrus/Jack
Webber
? depending on match ups.

my thoughts:
(1)If you run the offense through webber, there isn't much need to have baron out there.
(2)surround webber w/ defensive players. Kelenna>Monta defensively.
(3)surround webber w/ shooters/cutters.

but whether it be chemistry, consistency, or webber's oldness, it doesn't seem as though it's a viable option in nellie's opinion. though i got the feeling that was his original plan when bringing in webber w/ his it'll "allow him to use his bench more" statement.

by the evil monkey on Feb 28, 2008 2:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough
Re: MP's missed time
One thing people do tend to forget is that Buike has missed time this year and been hampered on the court by tendonitis in his knee. I noticed a big difference in his defensive ability since it started to bother him. Both guys have had some struggles throughout the year.

Re: Rolls
Yeah, think MP definitely fills a roll for Nellie. I'm not one of the guys saying he should never play, but I can understand the frustration.

I try to be as fair as possible with their limitations. Both guys frustrate me to some degree. Buike's D drives me nuts because I know it is the only thing standing between him and being a starting caliber SG in this league. If MP could get that corner three going again this year he would be a major asset to the team. As it stands they are both somewhat reliable back-ups and thats about it.

RE: Stats
Just for fun here is a copy of something I posted in another thread -

Quick comparison, just for fun. I'll use stats that are Per 36min played just to level the playing field a bit.

Buke: .456fg% .395 3pt% .713ft% 6.5reb 1.8ast 1.0stl 0.6blk 1.4to 3.2pf 14.9pts

MP: .404fg% .344 3pt% .656ft% 5.8reb 1.3ast 2.0stl 1.1blk 1.4to 5.9pf 11.4pts

The number show about what you expect. Buike is a much better offensive player, MP is a much better defensive player that fouls too much.

Anyway, it's been a fun chat.

by olympicmike on Feb 28, 2008 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I for one
would go with the Warriors fans who watch every Warriors games and notice the little things that make the team click over the Suns and Lakers' GMs (nice pickup for Shaq, good work Jerry Colangelo, way to scout talent).

Things that the experts can't tell you:

That Azubuike is much more clutch than Pietrus (game winning three versus Sixers is the most clear example)

That Azubuike's plus minus should be low, because the bulk of his minutes came during the first 7 games where the Warriors went 1-6. He hasn't seen much time since then, and when he does, it is usually in garbage time where +/- means nothing.

That Azubuike is like a J Rich Jr. the way he can post up his man.

That Azubuike is a smarter player than Pietrus. I like Pietrus actually, but this is just the truth. I already gave an example of Pietrus' low basketball IQ in this thread, so I won't give another one. But on a team with such wildcards as Jack, Baron, Harrington, and Barnes, I would much rather have the solid, consistent play of Buike than the wild, unpredictable play of Pietrus. We NEED production of the bench, and we never know if we are going to get it from Pietrus, it changes daily.

Pietrus is the type of player that casual observers LOVE, but team insiders grow discontented with. This is because on the surface he makes spectacular, athletic blocks and dunks and plays that can take your breath away. But he also does subtle things that nullify his positive contributions. Do you remember that game against San Antonio, where with a few seconds left and San Antonio down three, Pietrus LOSES Tony Parker, who hits a three? For all the athletic ability he has, he doesn't understand the game of basketball well, and as a result will do things like step out of bounds on drives (couple times), set a screen out of bounds (one time), foul man out near half court (numerous times), etc. He perenially plays like a promising rookie.

By the way, blindly following authority figures like Colangelo is not a good way to go when evaluating players. Anyone can have basketball knowledge if they watch and learn the game enough. Many who have watched Pietrus have come to the conclusion I have come to.

by belilaugh on Feb 28, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions  

affected by fouls
being that the w's are as uptempo as they come in the nba, fouls hurt them more than most teams.  The constant stoppages actually kills their rythm on both sides of the ball.  That's why the suns don't foul.  They'd rather let a guy go to the hoop uncontested than to foul him and slow their tempo.

And mp2 has one of the worst foul rates in the league.  So for every good defensive thing he does, he basically cancels it out by commiting a stupid foul.  Every time the dubs go into the penalty early, its like throwing a monkey wrench in the w's offensive machine.  Don't underestimate the damage caused by mp2's fouls.  Fouls hurt.  Especially the dumb ones.

"To my dear brother, Noompsy."

by Tim N Chris Burger on Feb 27, 2008 7:58 PM PST up reply actions  

The Warriors heavily rely on their defense
For a team who decides to go on a 15-2 run to win games (often at that), there has to be some remnance of defense played.  They are currently 3rd in steals and in the middle of the pack in terms of blocks in the lower levels in terms of rebounding.  Less rebounds means a whole lot more turnovers they have to create.  You can't say that this isn't a defensive minded team.  They just aren't your typical defensive minded team.

by mightymadskillz on Feb 27, 2008 5:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I got Pietrus love.
I have always supported Pietrus, ive been a fan throughout all the bashing that goes on in this site. Props to you Dubmanny for expressing it. Usually i dont even want to get in to it on this board since i know exactly what the reaction would be; "he steps out of bounds alot, stupid fouls, etc.. see above post". but really people say he does this more than he actually does. Pietrus is better than Barnes in my opinion, and has been playing better than Buike lately too.

Its nice to have a guy like him on the team when so many others dont play an ounce of defense some nights. He always plays hard. On a team such as ours, we need a guy like that.

All you haters need to stop. How can you bash on Pietrus so hard when he is playin with heart and hustle and a guy like webber comes in and doesnt put out any effort, is slow, lazy, and overweight, and makes some really stupid pass turnovers. (hes suppossed to be a good passer). He has made numerous turnovers on outlet passes already after defensive boards.

by ilubthedubs on Feb 27, 2008 4:05 PM PST reply actions  

nah
i watch pietrus play, he does go out of bounds with his feet before driving. and he's 6 foot 6, he's been in the league for several years, why hasn't his dribbling improved? he could be a really good player if he could dribble like jackson.

by bigbenny11 on Feb 27, 2008 4:19 PM PST reply actions  

Half of basketball is on defense
Why does he have to be great dribbler to useful? Why is it always all about offense?

Again people, the Warriors lead the league in scoring. Offense not a problem.

by Dubmanny on Feb 27, 2008 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

i dunno
i agree that he is a decent defender when motivated and playing the right position.  The thing that kills me with him is that he is so athletic but instead of working on his dribble to improve his drive, he settles for a step back fadeaway three

by BD4mvp on Feb 27, 2008 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

yes!
and i hate when he sits there on the three point line wide open, waits for a defender to come, takes a dribble in and steps back for the fade. its such a lower percentage shot!

by twelve years on Feb 27, 2008 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

lol
just thought it was funny you upgraded his dribbling to Jackson. If he is to work on his dribbling, he should at least aim a little higher. Otherwise, he'd get hated on. This time for dribbling off his leg instead of stepping out of bounds.

by lightz0ut on Feb 27, 2008 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

dude
jackson steps out of bounds like that almost as much as pietrus! its just overlooked because everyone is on his nuts

by ilubthedubs on Feb 27, 2008 9:18 PM PST up reply actions  

that's not saying much about pietrus...
jax has the ball in his hands around 10 times as much peitrus.  With the same rate of occurance, jax WOULD step out of bounds 10 times as much.
"To my dear brother, Noompsy."

by Tim N Chris Burger on Feb 27, 2008 9:29 PM PST up reply actions  

thats true but...
people are saying that he should have worked on this and rid his game of it by now. basically it shouldnt happen ever.

Jack has been in the league alot longer the Mickael, should he have not gotten rid of that too barring the same criticism?

by ilubthedubs on Feb 28, 2008 5:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Never say never...
Ish happens. I bet if mp2 was shooting the corner 3 at a 38%+ clip, less people would be talking about him stepping out of bounds.  The thing is mp2 doesn't contribute nearly as much as jax, so people don't notice him stepping out of bounds every once & a while.  Pietrus has been so notorious for that, plus he's struggling offensively, plus he's publicly asking to be traded... people are just looking for that step out of bounds routine to rear its ugly head.
"To my dear brother, Noompsy."

by Tim N Chris Burger on Feb 28, 2008 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Word
I won't say Pietrus is a great player, and I still think he should be traded (if only because I don't want a player in my locker-room that doesn't want to be there). But that said, he ranks pretty high in my ideal rotation. In order of utility (both offensive and defensive):
  1. Baron
  2. Monta (would be first but for his defense)
  3. Biedrins (more important defensively than Jax, in my opinion)
  4. Jackson
  5. Harrington (down recently, but in general a good scoring threat)
  6. Wizard of AZ
  7. Pietrus
  8. Croshere
  9. Watson
  10. Barnes (wayyyy over-rated... he only has a stat-line because others set him up... his hustle is easily matched by any of the 4 players listed above)  
"SCARY HOT!"

by Talimon on Feb 27, 2008 5:31 PM PST reply actions  

Barnes
is the only one Nelly trust to pass inbounds on critical plays.

by saintdee on Feb 27, 2008 5:46 PM PST reply actions  

If I recall...
 The reason Pietrus gets branded as having a "low IQ" was about 2-3 years ago.

 I believe it was at the end of the game and the score was tied and Pietrus fouls someone. Derek Fisher throws his hands in the air and says something to Pietrus. Pietrus just shrugs and walks away. Player that was fouled makes his free throws and Warriors lose.

 Anyway, that game was when Fisher was on the team so my memory is somewhat sketchy. But if I remember correctly, since then Pietrus and low IQ have been somewhat synonymous with one another.

by faybo on Feb 27, 2008 5:51 PM PST reply actions  

I poked around the Net
and I think I found the game you're talking about. Feb 13, 2006, vs Memphis. Game tied at 7.5 seconds, no fouls to give. Memphis had just missed and grabbed the rebound. Pietrus fouls Atkins 35 ft from the basket, who makes both. Fisher did tie it up, but Gasol finished us off.

GSOM open thread and GSOM recap.

by IQofaWarrior on Feb 27, 2008 7:31 PM PST up reply actions  

simple
 "I want to be moved," said Pietrus, who will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of this season and has no plans of returning to Oakland. "I want to be moved. I want to be moved. I want to be traded."

why anyone would root for a player who doesnt even wanna be on your team is beyond me. im not a big fan of barnes either. but at least he pushes the tempo(kinda important)and DOESNT COMPLAIN about guarding 4's

by teehjay on Feb 27, 2008 6:33 PM PST reply actions  

i do agree that there is some over-bashing
but the fact of the matter is pietrus does have some very irritating and frustrating tendencies and I think the big key here is that we drafted him 11th Overall! At least for me personally, the frustration comes into play so often becuase a) he has so much potential and b) like stated earlier he simply has not gotten better or shown the commitment to do so, a wasted talent. The fact that Buike, an undrafted, d-league free agent pick up is even close in productivity to a former #11 pick demonstrates Pietrus' lack of development and maybe lack of work ethic.
          I would still rather have Buike on the court over Pietrus straight up. The one thing I will give Pietrus is that he does hustle, but sometimes it is hustling without a purpose, or like yesterday's game hustling after his own turnover. And Pietrus is a better defender, but the one thing that is overlooked is his fouling situation. It almost negates his defense as he puts the opposing team to the line early and often. He average nearly 3 FOULS a game in 17 MINUTES. That is fouling out in 34 minutes of play on average. He has to be tops in the league in fouls/minute. That is horrendous as that indicated he is either constantly out of position or he is being overly-aggressive . Half of the game is defense, but let's not forget the other half too, offense. Pietrus is one of the least productive offensive players on our team. He is so one-dimensional as all his points usually come off someone else creating for him an open 3 point shot in the corner. That is it, just standing at the 3 point line in the corner waiting for someone to create for him. And it would be fine if he was very efficient from that spot, but he is shooting an average 33% from the 3 point line and don't even get me started on the classic I'm open for the three but I'm going to dribble once and then shoot a step back, fade-away contested 3. He can't drive to the hoop and finish(without turning it over), he is not a great passer, he rarely gets offensive rebounds(.6 a game), and even if he does, doesn't finish the put back or he gets fouled and here comes a 63% free throw shooter to the line. At least Buike has a diverse offensive game. He moves without the ball, can create for himself, is a better 3 point shooter(39%), is more active on the offensive glass(1.3/ per game), and is a lot stronger finisher in traffic as well as a better free throw shooter(71%).
           So yes, Pietrus is a better defender, but I believe his defensive lapses and his ridiculous habit of fouling are large weaknesses for him on the defensive end. Add that to the fact that he is not a good or efficient offensive player, I would actually say maybe the worst on the team, and that he won't even be on the team next year, I think Buike should be getting more minutes than Pietrus, I would even say a lot more minutes.

by innelliewetrust1989 on Feb 27, 2008 6:48 PM PST reply actions  

i hear you
about jackson dribbling the ball off his leg, I meant as far as being a competent enough ball handler that he can take over the point, also he has a nice crossover dribble and he can step b ack and shoot it. pietrus looks ackward as hell when he has the ball in his hands. if he could do some moves where he fakes and then dribbles once and shoots his game would improve remarkably.

by bigbenny11 on Feb 27, 2008 6:52 PM PST reply actions  

asdf
I give Pietrus props when he deserves it, which if you go into the past couple game threads you'll see is true, but at the same time if he doesn't deserve it then he won't get it.

I know you've said that Pietrus was playing pretty good the  last couple of seasons but he hasn't shown up this year on the offensive end at all. That corner three used to be a given, now he can only hit it after he gets a LOT of confidence from a steal or a block or something.

And he does have a low basketball IQ. Take last game, around two minutes left, Warriors up by around 8-10 (can't remember exactly), and the Warriors just missed a shot. Someone on the Warriors gets a rebound, and gives it out to Pietrus, with there still being around 22 seconds on the shot clock. Pietrus shoots the three pretty much the instant he gets it. Now, it goes in, so one could say no harm no foul, but that's just not a smart basketball move. You would NEVER see Davis do that, I don't even think you'd see Jackson do that.

But I do appreciate the defensive effort, some of the blocks that Peach gets are unreal.

by belilaugh on Feb 27, 2008 7:14 PM PST reply actions  

lol
I'm pretty sure we've seen Jackson do that about 903202309843 times this year
It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Feb 28, 2008 8:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Bull
we have seen him do it early in possessions in the first, second and third quarters, and even sometimes in the fourth. But NEVER in the waning moments of a game when protecting a lead. Don't get it twisted.

by belilaugh on Feb 28, 2008 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

azubuike
is overall better than pietrus period. dub manny, if you can tell me one reason why pietrus should be in the rotation other than his defence( we drafted him really high for his defense, so we should expect him to play great defense).Pietrus is a one demensional player with basically no moves in offense. him goin for the low percentage shot with that step back fade? the only person i compare him to right now is barnes. pietrus asks to be traded, i would never want someone on my team that doesnt want to be there. hell if monta asked to be trade, i would have to trade him and get someone who acually wants to play for us.
Face it. all your points are things we are expecting pietrus to do because we chose him as a lottery pick for his defense. he sucks. we shoulda traded him when we had a chance. he already had his chances to make up all his weaknesses a few years ago, but instead hes done nothing. still the occasional travel or step out of bounds, the constant fouls near the top of the key, and the "where do i go?" look when on offense. yes hes a good defensive player, hustles and can make alot of blocks, but it definetely doesnt make up on the offensive side of the floor. On your comment on buike, buike was undraftedand no body probably expected to see him do any good. look what he did when jackson was out. he was spectacular. His defense is probably not as good as pieturs, but its way bettr than montas. you shouldnt really hate on buike because i guarentee you if GSom puts a poll on who would u rather have on the rotation pieturs or buike, i bet you 80 percent would be buike. of course, were all not the coach, and of course nellie is still naive to play his young players. I bet you if pietrus was in the league for only 2 years, as much as azubuikes, nellie wouldnt even consider putting in pietrus. its the way he is. doesnt play them.

by GSwarrior on Feb 27, 2008 7:39 PM PST reply actions  

Are you serious?
You can't be serious about giving MP love... outside of his athleticism and his defense he is a complete liability.

If I have to watch MP miss both FTs throws from the line (Seattle game / playoffs come to mind) -- I'm going to lose it. His FT percentage is horrible for a swingman. If that wasn't enough his assist to turnover ratio is pathetic (only ahead of Biedrins for rotation players).

MP was a lottery pick who was described as a 'French Jordan'. That's the reason for the 'hating' -- because he's a one dimensional player with little to no value in the league.

That's why he didn't get any free agent interest last year and why the W's didn't get any interesting trade offers for him.

The NBA is all about consistency -- in the last five games he's got 1, 0, 12, 0, 11 points respectively. 0 points in 26 minutes against Atlanta? Playing for the run-and-gun W's? That's pathetic. That's fans hate MP.

Your Tyrone Hill and TimBug arguments hold no water here. I look forward to the day that MP earns an all-star birth playing for a different NBA team.

by geebear on Feb 27, 2008 9:32 PM PST reply actions  

dubmany!!
good point about 12 year olds in basement :P  

Pietrus wants to get traded because his clock is ticking and he hardly gets any playing time, and then when he gets to play he plays defense against power forwards or centers who all are 40+ pounds heavier and pound him inside for rebounds.

in a lot of situations he fouls instead of giving easy 2, although i agree, he is over-aggressive on mid-court defense and gets silly fouls all the time.

after asking to be traded he is playing with great passion which is a sign of great pro athlete.

nelson wants to space the floor to keep the lane open for bd / monta / jack. when that works teams typically fold into 2-3 zone to force warriors to shoot. that is very effective against warriors in half-court defense, especially if we are jacking 3s. our undersized power forwards barnes / pietrus / kelenna don't have many plays against zone by themselves.

they need to be slashing, but warriors don't run those plays because our best guys are shooting guards.  

in terms of offensive production mp should be 4th on the roster, but because nelson is sacrificing our small forward play , e.g. slashing and cutting and there are no plays are being run for him, he is nowhere near his expected production level.

overall i think that mp3 is an awesome player and i love the fact that warriors didn't trade him. there are not many players like him in this league and i think they need to resign him next season.

by farid on Feb 27, 2008 10:19 PM PST reply actions  

I actually like how
Pietrus just stands there on the baseline waiting for the ball so he can throw up a 3.  That way, the Dubz have a chance of grabbing an offensive rebound instead of immediately turning it over when we tries to dribble drive his way towards the hoop.

We've all been watching him since he got drafted and sadly, he does 1 of 4 things when he tries to penetrate.  He'll either take steps before he puts the ball down, step out of bounds, dribble the ball off his foot or run someone over for a charge.

The only time Pietrus ever looks good on offense is when he is not boxed out and he uses his atheletism to fly in and jam it back home.  This is my opinion and I did not get all this from listening to Barnett/Fitz.  I just don't feel he is as good of a player as he and Dubmanny thinks he is.

by misterjennings on Feb 28, 2008 12:10 AM PST reply actions  

To those comparing Buke to Pietrus
In the foul department, try to imagine Buke guarding a 6'10", 250 lb PF.  He'd be out of the game in 5 minutes by either (a) fouling 5 times or (b) giving up 5 easy layups.

Pietrus has a few problems:

(I) He wants to be traded
(I) He's not as good as our starters and thus doesn't get much PT because Nellie plays them a lot
  (A) This leads to (I)
  (B) This means that when he gets in, he's playing out of position.
    (i) He gets frustrated
    (ii) He fouls a lot
(c) He hasn't learned to stay within his area of expertise.
(d) He's kinda one dimensional.

All in all, he's not the worst player, but he's not the best, and he's not completely aware of what he can and can't do.  When you add that to the fact that he's constantly playing out of position, you can definitely see how he gets frustrated and wants to be traded.  I fully expect him to go to a strong minded coach next year and turn into Bruce Bowen in 3-4 years (without the high flying "kick to the face" jumpshot defense).

by Dubs fan in Boston on Feb 28, 2008 6:59 AM PST reply actions  

I got the Pietrus love
     Much respect for dubmanny and jason since defending Pietrus here is like defending a sex offender trying to move into the neighborhood.

     I do think Pietrus is very valuable to this team, and Mulson think so too, or else we would've tried harder to trade Pietrus. But I think the fact that it's a contract year for him is affecting his play. He tries to get a steal or block every single time his opponent gets the ball instead of just playing solid defense. He has never did this in years past.

     The numbers back up my observation: 7.94 fouls/48 minutes this year, compared to 5.5 fouls/48 minutes his previous four years. Now Nellie does play him out of position at the four, but last year his average was only slightly more than his previous 3 years, at 5.54 fouls/48 minutes. Similarly, his change in defensive style is shown in his steals numbers. In the previous four years he averaged 1.49 steals/48 minutes, and under Nellie last year the average was actually down to 1.25 steals/48 minutes. This year, his average more than doubled to 2.74 steals/48 minutes. So his steals have increased by a much higher percentage than his fouls, but I'm not sure that is for the good of the team since he is capable of playing better solid, positional defense.  

      I'm not blaming the guy since he's in a contract year. You need to get numbers to get a big contract, and it's hard to get numbers when you're not playing that much, you're in a shooting slump, and you can't create easy baskets for yourself. Still, if he just could shoot the ball like last year he would help himself and the Warriors a lot. Last year he shot 48.8% from the field and 38.8% from the line. Both were career highs, so perhaps that was fluky. If so, he can still help this team on the defensive end. He's probably a more useful defender than Azubuike and Barnes right now; if not, I'm sure that he can be if he stops going for so many steals (I don't mean stop trying to steal completely, but he goes for a steal every single time).

     Some of the arguments against him I've seen are really irrational. Why does it matter if he's improved at all from his rookie year? What matters  to this team is what he's brings to the table today. It doesn't matter if what he brings to the table today is the exact same thing he's brought for the past five years, or better or worse. His work ethic will be relevant in deciding whether we want him as part of our future, but it shouldn't be a factor in whether to give him playing time over another player.  

     Also, he turns it over .7 times in 17.5 minutes per game this year. This is so low I don't see how people could complain about his turnovers (well actually I do, his turnovers can be retarded). Yes, his turnover rate is probably a little high compared to the number of times he gets to touch the ball, but since he's not touching the ball very often to begin with, there's very little damage he can do. Even if he got his turnovers down to a very respectable .5 per game, we're still only talking about a difference in one turnover every five games. His turnovers aren't really the game-deciding mistakes that many seem to make them out to be.

     When Pietrus is playing like he can, he's a vital cog in this machine. When he's not, he can be a detriment to the team. So we should probably play him every game and keep him in if he's having a good game... which is exactly what Nellie does.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Feb 28, 2008 9:40 AM PST reply actions  

Like Pietrus but.....
he should not still be on this team. He came off his contract situation with a little bit of attitude and it shows in his play.
He overplays on defense which leads to him fouling and on offense he will sometimes force his shots or try to drive when he shouldn't. When his game is right, he is a defensive minded player first, and won't worry about getting the ball on the offensive end.
I think on a different team, he will once again be that player than can play lock down D and contribute consistently on offense. It just isn't going to happen here. Don't get me wrong he's had some games were he has played well defensively and is probably ahead of Barnes right now, but he is not playing his game every night.

by tangel29 on Feb 28, 2008 11:58 AM PST reply actions  

Agree
His bad play is not so much a result of his ignorance (he was ignorant last year) but rather his immaturity. His lack of a big time deal or a trade has left his head exactly where it looks like it is half the time - up his arse!

by triplesix on Feb 28, 2008 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

wow
I was blown away by the way you talked about us Dub fans.  I wish i was the perfect fan like you. Lets see, whats Pietrus been doing lately and all season? 26 minutes 0 points?  4 fouls in 7 minutes?  Missed layups, missed dunks, and my biggest gripe besides his ball handling, Pietrus almost never gets the oppurtunity for a 3 point play when he gets fouled going to the basket. Watch him, everytime he gets fouled going to the basket he'll go to the line for 2 not for the possible 3, ever.  I dont like Pietrus because I dont feel like we benefit much with him being on the court, he won't be with us next year and Buke will, so I would rather have Buke play.  And as to everyone saying he's a lock down defender, I havent seen much of that.  Maybe little flashes here and there but what I see mostly is a guy that plays erratic on both sides of the floor.  I've been watching Warriors games for quite some time now and this guy hasnt improved much.  And on our "beloved Barnes" I don't think Barnes should play until his head is straight, he told Matt Steinmetz he's still in shock and his heads not right.  And I'm not 12, I'm 24.

by drizztismoneybaby on Feb 28, 2008 3:33 PM PST reply actions  

Great idea
I don't think Barnes should play until his head is straight

Getting over his mother's death? Maybe he should just retire because it could be years.

by triplesix on Feb 28, 2008 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Finally
A good diary worth reading - sound arguments for and against. I do have to say that for all his bonehead plays I still love his athleticism on both ends of the court.

by triplesix on Feb 28, 2008 4:22 PM PST reply actions  

glad dumbnubby's not coach
we'd have the bad news bears of basketball out there!
pietrius? Pietrius?
the guys a noob. if he was so "impressive" (as us so labeled "haters" will agree) why didn't we get any decent trade offers for him? carlos arroyo? jason williams? chuck e cheese? You demand a trade with your agent---for what? Someone made a great point he hasn't really developed much outside of some more consistent shooting.He still does the things he did years ago--athletic jams, defense-BUT THAT's THE PROBLEM: He hasn't developed other important parts: Passing, Dribbling, Basketball IQ to better complement the team.
That's the problem I have with all these emotional
silly posts about coaches hating players and warriors fan's hating this and that. IT has nothing to do with other people but the man in the mirror. It's up to Michael to upgrade his game not the fans. So you can go throw a fit and say im a mean fan because I don't like michael's game. and you can say nellie is just some judgemental old fool because he does this and that. It doesn't change the undeniable fact that its up to the player to improve at this level.

Come on this isn't rocket science people. Coaches play players because: a)they help us win now: baron, sjak b)they are developing and help us with specific skills: monta (scoring), andris (defense/rebounding), Azuibike (tough defense, rebounding, timely shooting).

Let's take the girly he said she said, you hater blah blah rants out of it and reason like the true basketball fans.

by 11allstar on Feb 28, 2008 8:53 PM PST reply actions  

ok
would have been a halfway decent post if it weren't for the grade-school name-calling.  
I pray i never have to use a gun again.

by ssmokinjoe on Feb 28, 2008 9:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Whoever wrote this
is obviously just looking for attention. And no it's not a halfway decent point, because his points are, Pietrus tries hard, is bad because of the position he plays, was good UNTIL this year and then compares him to Tim Hardaway.

by SpreeForThree on Feb 29, 2008 7:41 PM PST reply actions  

The Pietrus of the Philly Game
 ... is a very nice player to watch. Great effort. Great athleticism.

Unfortunately that player didn't show up much before the trading deadline.

Unprofessional? Laying down before? Really playing hard for that contract now?

Who knows. But sure looks like he's been dogging it when you see the Philly level of effort.

by soem on Mar 1, 2008 8:15 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Warriors2_medium_small
Tom Abdenour... Where is he now?
Ringnovember1981_small
Why the Warriors Should Move to San Francisco

Recent FanPosts

Small
Stream Games online?
Small
2012 Draft: To Pick or Not to Pick, That is the Question
Small
To Tank, or Not To Tank
Small
stats question
Mmm_small
Off topic thread : 2k12, music, etc.
Angel_beats__logo_small
Appreciating the Run and Gun Warriors
Small
Off Topic: GSOM HTML/CSS suggestions
Nba_g_troph_286_small
Would Atlanta like to re-tool its roster?
Small
Joel Przybilla

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot