Long Distance Fan Perspective
Hello, this is my first post. I am a fan of the Warriors, and dare I say a bandwagon fan. I don't live in the bay area, so I think its acceptable, I just like the run and gun offense and the Warriors are fun to watch. There is no basketball team in my city, so I adopted the Warriors, I hope that is ok.
Anyhow, as someone looking in from the outside it was pretty clear how things went down with BD getting benched in the Suns.
Nelly saw that the team, after the Nuggets clearly handled them in Oakland, could not contend for a Championship. Heck, he said that he didn't think they could even make the playoffs without Webber just a few months ago, what has changed? Nothing, no Webber, still horrible defense, inconsistent sloppy play, that is not going to get it done, even if the Warriors somehow could eek their way into the playoffs and Nelly knows it.
So Nelly tanked the Suns game. Why eek your way in just to get beat down by the Lakers in 4 straight? That doesn't make any sense. At least this way we get a lottery pick and have a better chance of getting the big man/defensive player/rebounder the team most obviously lacks and needs.
Also, dump BD. I like him, but he is getting older, has been injury prone in the past, he knows this is a contract year, probably why he somehow managed to stay injury free, I wouldn't expect that to continue in the future. Dump him, sign Ellis to the point and Belinelli can step up, get the big man you need somehow, I don't care how, maybe the draft or some kind of trade, but with BD out we will have much more money to spend.
Also, a lot of you seem to be high on Biedrins, I am not drinking the water there so maybe I am immune, but the guy is average at best, he is rough to watch, it looks lucky every time he scores, he is so frail and his free throws are about the ugliest thing I have seen on a basketball court. Harrington isn't much better though, if you are going to have a team that relies on 3-point shooting, why not get some of those? It doesn't make sense. That's why Belinelli would be good as a starter, he is probably the best 3-point shooter on the team and he is sitting bench. Dump BD and his large contract, use that money on a big man and move Belinelli up the depth chart.
And this is old, but how in the world did they let JRich go? That guy was so electrifying, I was bummed about that. Brandon Wright is so thin, please someone get him on some protein powder, he looks like he is about to blow over.
I am so frustrated with the team right now, I only get a few games on espn and they break my heart just about every time.
I LOVE LOVE Ellis though. This guy is the real deal, LOCK HIM UP. He is a guy to build around for the future.
Do something Mullin, I wish we could get JRich back, that guy was awesome, how can you dump a guy that places an ad in the newspaper like he did? I don't get that. Oh well, I would love some feedback from this if I am wrong or what because I don't live in the Bay and don't always get Warriors news.
Also, the post about dumping Nelly was not a bad idea either, get a coach with the same run and gun mentality but a coach who isn't afraid to throw his bench players out there and give his starters a much needed break and pace them for a long season.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
99 comments
Comments
lmao
i dont even know what to say…... biedrins is lucky everytime he shoots? i guess his luck overwhelms the luck of every other center in this league?
by saintdee on Apr 19, 2008 6:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You should try watching...
Biendrins shoot his lucky shots on TV over at the Blue Bonnet with a pitcher of Sierra Nevada!
by Tony.psd on Apr 19, 2008 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
dumbest blog ive ever seen, ya lets just not sign baron or biedrins and get a totally new team with no chemistry
by FeartheBeard4 on Apr 19, 2008 6:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think both of you misconstrued what I said. I don’t believe I said “Bierdins is lucky everytime he shoots”. I said he’s not that good. Seems like a lot of people on here are singing his praises. I’m not in that group for sure. He can’t D up for anything and he’s not that great offensively either, I think he benefits from Baron and Monte being so good and taking a lot of attention and finding him under the hoop. He would be a bench player on most other teams. Most other good teams anyway.
“lucky everytime” “dumbest ever”, is everyone is san francisco so irrational? Don’t answer that. “Lets just not sign Baron” is not the plan, try to trade him or find some way to deal him away because that contract is brutal, that money could be used better elsewhere, this is probably the best year he will ever have, he is injury prone, it is downhill from here, I hate to break it to everyone, I’m not drinking the water there, so I am immune to the myopia.
“Lets just not sign Biedrins” I don’t know all the possibilities with Biedrins, I don’t like him, I don’t think they should overpay for him, use good judgement on what to do in the current situation, if you can trade him for somebody that can actually play a little defense and board at times other then the when the ball bounces right to him then take it.
by runandgun on Apr 19, 2008 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Captain Picard FTW!
Excellent Retort.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://adonalobsessed.blogspot.com/
"Zorgon is definately the Mike Gravel of GSoM." - Zorgon
by Zorgon on Apr 20, 2008 1:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
why did we get rid of JRich? so we could re-sign monta and beans. Biedrins is average? I dont think there are that many 7 footers with great hands, pull down 10 rebounds a game, have a good touch around the rim, and can play in the warriors system just floating around out there.
by sam23 on Apr 20, 2008 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What does that red flag mean?
Is that a “tattle tail” flag? LOL
by Tony.psd on Apr 19, 2008 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
asdf
An admitted bandwagon fan, I didn’t know there were any of those left after missing the playoffs, I thought they’d all dry up and go to New Orleans.
First off, the Warriors aren’t going to win a championship until there is some defensive effort. Getting rid of BD isn’t going to make us better on the defensive end but most likely worse. If you haven’t noticed BD normally guards the 2 guard and Ellis is switched up to the point because BD is physically able to handle 2 guards and Ellis isn’t. If you’ve seen BD abuse Nash you’re getting a preview of what would happen to Ellis nightly because of his size. If you think dumping BD, moving Ellis to PG and starting Marco at the 2 then you’re not watching the same Warriors team a lot of us are.
As for Biedrins, how could you not love the kid? He’s just turned 22 and when he gets steady playing time he’s legit, the reason he seems so inconsistent is because his playing time fluctuates so much. Take a look at his stats the last month of the season when he got real playing time
Spurs – 16 mins – 8 pts – 7 boards against Oberto
Mavs 24 mins – 7 pts – 8 boards against Dampier
Memphis – 36 mins – 21 pts – 17 boards against Darko
Hornets – 37 mins – 17 pts – 15 boards against Chandler
Sac – 35 mins – 17 pts – 17 boards against Hawes/Moore
Denver – 39 mins – 11 pts – 19 boards against Camby
Clippers – 34 mins – 10 pts – 14 boards against Brand
Suns – 26 mins – 16 pts – 11 boards against Shaq
Sonics – 40 mins – 20 pts – 17 boards against Collison/Wilcox
Even with those two games he DIDN’T play consistent minutes he averaged 14/14 for the month of April and it was the first month he’d played over 30 mins a game, just over in fact at 31.4 minutes. The kid is a beast when given steady playing time but I’m afraid that’s not going to happen until Nellie is gone.
As for letting J Rich go, you should love that if you love Ellis that much because without letting J Rich go we don’t sign Ellis this off season. It was a simple decision, keep J Rich and possibly lose Ellis and/or Biedrins and never get Wright, now with J Rich gone we have a budding young tandem of Ellis and AB we’ll be able to sign along with what I think is going to amount to KG 2.0 in Wright.
What we really need is a decent back up PG to spell BD because it was obvious to anybody who watches a lot of games that he was just flat out of gas. We rode 3 playeres 40 minutes a night the whole season, even if we did make the playoffs we would have been done in the 1st round because they were bound to break down sooner or later. We just need to be smart about this draft and go after a back up PG or a defensive specialist/rebound hog. Also we need to address the bench issue because obviously MP2 is gone, Barnes might be back because I doubt anybody will sign him after his season, Croshere could be back but I wouldn’t hold my breath, Buike can opt out so we’re definitely going to have to hit the market and see what’s out there in the way of reserves.
by J Rich 4 MVP on Apr 19, 2008 7:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know why people immediately figure the logical solution is to trade Baron.
When Troy Hudson went down the need for a backup PG became crucial. I guess the FA market didn’t look too tempting for Mullin and we got CJ Watson. I think CJ was capable of more, but I don’t think he had the ball handling abilities to earn himself such a prominent role.
This season was a bit of bad luck for this team, especially at the guard position.
by so ill so d0pe on Apr 20, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the response. Good info, as I said, I don’t live in the area and I only see the games that are nationally televised, I didn’t see most every game like some of you, but I did read box scores and see highlights.
The reason I want to get rid of BD isn’t because I don’t think he is a good defender or a good player, I think he is a very good player. The problem I have with him is that he is injury prone and he makes 17 mllion a year which is huge money, and I think for the future he is going to get worse and more injury prone as he gets older.
Yes I can see how having Monte and Belinelli could cause defensive problems, but if that was a problem, then why did they draft Belinelli in the first place? He’s going to only be in the game if Monte or BD sits, seems like Monte is not going to sit very much because he is too good to sit and like you said, you can’t sit BD because of defensive problems, why even draft the guy if playing him is going to cause so many problems? It doesn’t make sense.
Maybe I havn’t seen the best of Beidrins, but I think those number are scewed because Monte and BD are so good at penetrating and passing to him, a lot of centers in the league would have gotten those numbers. He doesn’t seem like a very good defender either. I am outside of the Warriors area and don’t here your local chatter, but nationally he is an unknown, a common player and I havn’t seen anything to warrent all the love he gets on the forums and blogs I have read. Maybe he will get better, but I don’t see how, he is not a classic big man, he is so skinny. HIm and Wright need to start putting some serious work in the weight room, how can they handle for example a guy like Boozer? Its a complete mismatch and the Warriors have no answer for a guy like that which most every good team has. And you have people talking about paying Biedrins 9 million when he has all those flaws, I don’t see it, I think that would be overpaying him, but like I said, I don’t see every game, maybe I would think differently if I did.
Good info about JRich, I didn’t know all that, I heard it was a salary cap move, that’s too bad they mismanaged it so poorly and had to let him go. Seems like you should do everything you can to keep a guy that seemed like a real team player and loyal to the city. Not to mention crazy skills. But I guess if you have to choose between JRich and Monte, Monte seems to fit the system better so I would probably agree although I would take a 3rd option and trade BD away and keep JRich. Also, I am not sold on Wright, he has the same problem as Biedrins, too thin to match up with the other teams big man.
But you know, maybe I need to be patient and let him and Biedrins develop, but Wright (and Belinelli) really need to get in the game more, doesn’t seem like they got many chances to develop. That killed the team down the stretch because the starters were all tired and the bench guys were too inexperienced to contribute. Maybe dump Nelly in favor of a younger guy with the same run and gun style. I think it can work if they get the right pieces in place, they just don’t have one good big man/defender/boarder, enough good consistent 3 pt shooters. That’s why I want Belinelli to play more, he can bust it out from 3 pt land, but doesn’t seem to fit in the starting lineup EVER. I just see brick after brick from Harrington. BD starts chucking it up there sometimes too much too, he is inconsistent from 3 range. JRich seemed to be good from there, they really missed that guy who could get open and hit one like he used to do.
Anyway, seems like Mullin has his work cut out for him, I think he could do a lot more if BD was off the team he would have a lot of cap space to work and be able to make the necessary moves to fix all these problems.
by runandgun on Apr 19, 2008 9:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
bellinelli
the best 3 point shooter on the team? stop judging him on ONE summer league game. the guy shot a horrible % this year and he shot a horrible % over seas. he is NOT a great shooter. i think he could be a decent bench guy, but he’s not going to be a 3-pt specialist, i hate that he has that reputation.
by sam23 on Apr 20, 2008 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha, I am from around here but I don’t drink water so I tend to see Dris in different light than the ones who want to give him 9mil.
I think he has a good attitude( too good to be a defensive force, I’d prefer a crazy Ron-ron type) They say Dris has good hands but his free throws are so bad that I doubt that, I think he just carries a big supply of Lester Hayes stick-um in his hair. He has the big redwood tree defense down quite well, stand tall and hold up your arms and hope someone runs into you, and apparently he’s quite good at volleyball since he seems to prefer a jab to a grab when rebounding. I give him a 7.
That other skinny tall guy Brandon Wright has more upside in my opinion. He seems to be able to shoot from more than 6 inches away from the rim and has some hops in his get-em-up, still doesn’t seem mean or crazy enough but maybe that can be taught? If Brandon can get as pissed as KG there might be hope for him? A good place to start would be for him to choke some more playing time out of nellie next year.
I think the only explanation for bellinili was nellie needed to draft someone totally off the wall so there would be no doubts about his weirdness, sorta like bringing back Cwebb this year and telling everyone how good he still was?.
Running Jason off to pay Monta is one of those things that I’d only expect from the club who did the same thing with Arenas and I guess will do the same thing to Monta when a new fresh young babe comes along? All it got us was smaller, quicker, weaker, and less threes. Not worth the hit to team chemistry or to the fans who enjoyed watching Jason grow and learn and wanted to savor the results for a few years.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Apr 19, 2008 10:43 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
A few points
That have probably already been made.
1) The Warriors are competetive. no way they purposefully tanked to get the 14th pick instead of the 15th.
2) Baron Davis played all 82 games this season. Right now, he is our team.
3) Monta Ellis is not a PG. Yet, at any rate. He is an incredible player, but if he is our starting point guard, we do not make the playoffs.
4) We traded JRich so we could afford to resign Monta and Biedrins. They are both free agents now, and will want to make at least 8 million more this year than they’ve been making. That comes out to an extra 16 million dollars a year, which, ironically, was about what JRich was being payed. After all, you can’t expect Monta to keep averaging 20ppg while being payed the league minimum.
5) Unless you shoot 5 times, you don’t lead the league in fg% by getting lucky. Sure, Andris doesn’t have the most orthodox free throw form, but he is incredible at moving without the ball, has soft hands, and finishes fantastically. Plus he gets himself easy buckets because of offensive rebounds.
6) Bandwagon or not, California or not, all Warriors fans are welcome and cherished. Welcome to GSoM!
by bradyk2 on Apr 19, 2008 10:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
more biedrins hate
seriously, did he do something to some gsom members families? there’s absolutely no reason for the negativity he gets here, and to say we should get rid of him because “i don’t like him” is absurd
by AJC3317 on Apr 19, 2008 11:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
thats
what i am confused about.. apparently people think that by passing on biedrins we will be able to get a duncan or amare type player.
by saintdee on Apr 19, 2008 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah its wierd
I don’t get the logic of how getting rid of Baron and Biedrins will somehow mean that a superstar bigman will fall into our laps.
Every team in the league knows that to compete for a championship you need a quality interior presence on both ends of the floor. So even if we trade Baron, there is no way in hell anyone will give up a stud bigman to the Dubz in return.
I’m not drinking water out of the Bay, and I’ll say straight up, without those 2 the Dubz would be lucky to win 20 games next year in an even tougher west.
by misterjennings on Apr 20, 2008 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we'd only won 20 games....
We’d have a chance to get Beasley/Rose!!! Don’t you see?? By playing Beans, we cost ourselves the chance to get “the next Duncan/Amare”. It all makes sense now.
Seriously people:
Beans “plays bad defense” because Monta & co. don’t play defense. Beans has to help out so much that if he played hard nosed defense he’d foul out in 5 minutes ala Pietrus circa December/January. You only notice Beans more because he’s always the one at the cup defending the final layup. You don’t notice Monta getting blown by, or Baron blowing an assignment, or Buike falling over himself.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Apr 22, 2008 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A couple comments
First of all, Monta and Beans are in for sure. not sure what mullins wil do, but i hope he can get buike and watson back too. And onto baron. i love him, he is so cool and so good. but as much as it pains me, he needs to go. Why? Well first of all, i want us to sign him. If baaron is not a warrior it is because we traded him. Trade BD to the heat for dequin cook and 1-2 over pick, whihc we get D.Rose. can i say enough about this guy. He has monta speed, quickness, hoops, and athleticism combined with D. Williams passing, defense, and overall shooting. He is too good. the heat want to win now and are trading to pull a celtics next year. Bd will not stay health. It was his contract year.
by montasmob69 on Apr 19, 2008 11:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
marco and monta
bad idea. I see marco coming off the bench, playing 20-25 minutes averaging 15 points and winning 3 6th man awards. Monta is a bad defender, but if you wantch those last few games, you have to be happy. He is improving and everyone knows how quickly he learns. Rose, Ellis, Jackson, Wright, Beans will dominate next year and throw in buike and marco and that is tough to beat, plus cook and the 14th pick will help as well
by montasmob69 on Apr 19, 2008 11:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yikes!
You really think that a non-playoff team this year will make the playoffs if we substitute Baron Davis for derrick rose? they may be similiar in talent in a few years but there is no way Rose can contribute half as much leadership and heart as Baron has.
by bradyk2 on Apr 20, 2008 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to see
Marco do what you predict too. But those numbers are insane for someone to achieve having played in less than 35 games in the NBA. I’d be happy if he averages over 7 points a game next year.
I just can’t see how Miami would want to give up their pick for Baron if they won the lottery. Not just Dubz fans know about Baron’s durability concerns and I’m sure Pat Riley would agree with your raving reviews about Rose. So why would the Heat want to risk all that money for Baron when they can get a young stud for substantially less that is almost sure to deliver like CP3 and Deron coming out of college?
Plus if they get the #1 pick, I see them picking up Mike-B instead because he would easily better Durant’s numbers playing in the east and get them into the playoffs.
by misterjennings on Apr 20, 2008 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not gonna happen
End of story.
Let’s also see if Oklahoma City (err… Seattle) will trade Beasley for PoB in a S&T. They could totally use the TPE.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Apr 22, 2008 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
I agree with everyone who has pointed out that we’re not gaining a superstar by letting go of Baron and Beans. Here are the only stars who will really be available next year
-Gilbert Arenas
-Elton Brand
-Shawn Marion
Not saying those wouldn’t be good players, but it’s not like last year where Kidd, KG, Kobe, etc. were looking for homes.
by bradyk2 on Apr 20, 2008 12:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade Andris and sign and
trade Webber for Charles Barkley in his prime = Problem solved
Maverick Fans Just don't get it.... Dirk = Deutshland
by dallaswarrior on Apr 20, 2008 12:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Elton Brand
would never join the Dubz if Baron Davis was not on the team still. So trading one for the other is out of the question. Both of those guys want and need to win now because their window will fade in a couple of years.
The only way we could get Brand is if Baron opted to stay and the Clips do nothing this offseason to surround him with better talent and he demands a trade (Which I simply cannot see happening).
Either we get lucky in the lottery (#1 pick) or pick up an overlooked, undervalued bigman at the end of the lotto. Otherwise, this offseason, there simply are not many quality, game-changing bigmen on the market.
Don’t forget we still have B-Wright who should only improve and seems to have the right attitude and work ethic to get a ton better this offseason.
by misterjennings on Apr 20, 2008 12:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I say...
We focus less on changing, and more on playing better.
-Have Andris, Monta, Brandan and Kosta hit the weightroom.
-Have everyone practice free throws.
-Have Baron, Stephen, Al, Monta, Marco and Buike practice 3s.
-Have Barnes work with Tony Robinson to get his confidence back.
-Draft someone good.
Play well. In my opinion, with a team that went 34 wins, 42 wins, 48 wins, don’t change anything. When we take a step back, or reach our peak and can’t get in the playoffs, change something. Till then, keep working on your games. No one on this team is very far past their peak.
by bradyk2 on Apr 20, 2008 12:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
just work on
defense (challenging every shot, better rotation, more tenacity) and rebounding (boxing out).
If you watched the game 1 of the Spurs and Suns today you could see that the Spurs won because their role players like Thomas and Bowen played relentless defense during the comeback. Guys like Parker and Ginobili are going to score as they did just like how Monta, Baron and Jax does for the Dubz, but the difference is the defensive and rebounding effort. Granted they have a Duncan, but you can see how even their role bench players maximize their defensive effort.
by misterjennings on Apr 20, 2008 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about....
Dump Biedrins and start Croshere! HAHAHAHAHAHA syke!
by Tony.psd on Apr 20, 2008 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't live in San Francisco
and I think that Don Nelson….DIDN’T TANK THE SEASON!
I think that Baron, simply, played badly.
Well, I visited it once, so I suppose my mind is permanently poisoned….sigh….
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://adonalobsessed.blogspot.com/
"Zorgon is definately the Mike Gravel of GSoM." - Zorgon
by Zorgon on Apr 20, 2008 2:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you for bringing up the Spurs/Suns games, anyone who saw that game and compared that with the Warriors saw that the Warriors are not in that league yet. consistent defense, consistent shooting, mental toughness, the Warriors lack that.
Some changes really need to be made if the Warriors expect to make a championship run.
In response to all the posters who say its dumb to dump BD and Biedrins, I’m not saying to just dump them outright, that would be stupid. I am saying that BD’s value right now is at its highest point. This was a contract year and guys know that and play their best and do everything they can to stay healthy. His history does not support that he will stay healthy in the future. Right now is a good time to trade him and actually get something back because his value is high. Trying to trade him when he is hurt or his skills are obviously declined and his a bloated contract will be near impossible. Again, not talking about just letting him go, get something back for him.
If they want to keep Biedrins, that wouldn’t be as bad as keeping BD, so I could get with keeping Biedrins, but I think he is overrated in the forums I have seen, I’m just saying don’t overpay for him.
In response to a previous post, if they dumped JRich to sign Monta and Biedrins, then why were those 2 guys not locked up long term? It’s only been 1 year, did those guys have only a 1 year contract?
by runandgun on Apr 20, 2008 7:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
they dumped JRich
so theyd be under the salary cap this offseason and have room to lock up monta and beans.
by sam23 on Apr 20, 2008 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, Biedrins and Monta did not have one-year contracts (that would be dumb). They finish out their rookie contracts this season. The Warriors cannot give them extensions during the season, according to the CBA, so they’ll hammer out extensions this summer.
It never occurred to me that one man could play with the faith of 50 million.
by imovermyhead on Apr 20, 2008 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
JRich
made 10 mil a year, and another obvious point that nobody likes to point out is the development of Ellis once JRich was gone.
I will always be a huge Richardson fan, met his out here in Hawaii and we spoke for a while about bball, one of the best experiences of my life as far as NBA goes. Unfortunately Mully realized JRich had reached his potential, and his style of play leads to a very steep decline.
Monta (runandgun its spelled with an a!) and Andris weren’t locked up yet because the dubs need to make sure they are for real. This time last year Monta disappeared in the playoffs, so Mully needed to make sure its the right choice.
And can everyone relax on the trade Baron posts and comments! BoomDizzle is currently the face of our franchise, and is in the top 5 or so clutch shooters. I for one dont mind $17 on a guy with the brass to take big shots at the end of important games. And the top teams in the league need a player like that, no matter what.
I agree somewhat with bradyk2 in that less change is better. Our bench will have a new look no matter what, and my best prediction is the Al will be traded this offseason to clear up cap room, so we will still have an interesting off-season regardless. Lets watch and enjoy!
by IceDubs on Apr 20, 2008 7:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately Mully realized JRich had reached his potential, and his style of play leads to a very steep decline.
I don’t know how you can say this after the season JRich just had.
And as far as Mullin goes, would it have even been necessary to clear this salary space to resign Monta and Beans if we were not still paying on Foyle’s absurd contract ? And won’t we still be paying on it next season as well? Who is responsible for that contract? Maybe it’s Mullin that needs to be traded.
by centerre on Apr 20, 2008 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's nice to get a post
with a different perspective because there are a few beans fans that “ghost ride the *ick”. to be honest, because of this season i dont what’s better. baron injured missing 30 games or baron healthy playing all 82?
logically, you would think for someone who has missed as many games in consecutive seasons, his body would hit a “wall”. so im sure baron has a few good season left in him and baron gettin old is not quit an excuse, cmon he’s only 29. i think baron will have a just as good of year if not better next year.
as far as biedrins goes, i felt this was his season or “contract season” to prove that he wasn’t a fluke. to me, beans isnt worth the money but if they were willing to give to adonal then i guess he’s gonna get his payday! keep beans at the most reasonable cost.
now that i put my 2 cents in, you have to remember your’re the one with the “long distant perspective”. so with as many of us bleeding “the city” since birth you have to be ready to catch some heat. it’s not just frisco when you talk dubz, you’re talkin about the the entire BAY.
aka GOLDENBOYWARRIOR
by gogomaplata on Apr 20, 2008 7:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
HAHA yes I get it that many warriors fans from the bay are bleeding the city, that’s cool, I respect that, wouldn’t have it any other way. I love watching the Warriors home games on TV seeing all the fans, hearing about how its the best place in the NBA to see a game because of that, its cool. I want to see a game there someday.
But yeah, I’m not subject to any delusions, maybe I’m just a cold-hearted businessman and don’t really have any attachments to BD because I see its a good time to sell high. Responding to a previous post, I don’t think they should trade BD no matter what, i think Mully should put him on the table and field offers for him and maybe make a few offers, that’s all. If something makes sense, then take it. If not, then keep him.
MontA has got to stay, he is electric and should be the cornerstone like Dwayne Wade in Miami. I like Jax as a supporting piece, anyone else I can take or leave honestly, if it makes sense for the team then move them and get someone else in here that fits the system. I would prefer to keep Belinelli because they need at least 1 good 3 point shooter, and I like Azubuke and Pietrus, but those guys are role players and can be replaced. A few names I wouldn’t mind seeing brought in, Shawn Marion, Brand, Jermaine O’Neill, Artest would be awesome, get some defensive attitude, seems like a lot of possibilities out there to make the team better.
But yeah, I’m not married to some of the players like some fans are so it may be easier for me to let them go. However, I am engaged to Monta HAHA, oh wait, I shouldn’t say that Gavin Newsome might get ideas.
by runandgun on Apr 20, 2008 8:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
bradyk2
I like what your sayin, everybody keeps talkin about tradin baron for a number 1 draft pick, not signin beans, hello? were on the rise were getting better and can only improve once again. I wish barnes could find his confidence again, last year in our playoff run he was my 2nd favorite player next to baron during that time simply cause he did everything that doesn’t show up in the stat book to win, and also he was very consistent from three. I think that he was the biggest reason why we didn’t make the playoffs this year just like i think he was one of the bigger reasons why we did make the playoffs last year because he was our bench but he was nowhere to be found this year. As far as getting a power forward there is so many scenarios and they all usually mean we lose either monta, baron or beans which we can’t lose! i think we should sign leon powe, oakland native, strong physical does the dirty work type of guy, the only reason why he doesnt play much now is because of kevin garnett. As far as draft, i like darrell arthur, i like chris douglas roberts. Darrell Arthur is a ball hawk, can board and is athletic, CDR is long and we could use his going to the basket skills off the bench when our three’s arent goin down
by FeartheBeard4 on Apr 20, 2008 9:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed!
Let’s just focus on getting better. I think Nellie will learn from this season, and that will make players better. he will give Azubuike, Bellinelli, Wright, Harrington and Barnes more PT, which will in turn positively effect their playing. And he will rest Baron, Jackson and Monta more so that they are stronger down the stretch.
As for the draft, I feel we already have a ton of great perimeter players, no need to develop more (though that’s just my opinion). I love the idea of getting Powe, but if we don’t, as I mentioned in another thread, I’d love to draft Robin Lopez (unless we can get Brook). He’s over 7 feet, and is a solid rebounder, defender and shot-blocker, which is what we need when Biedrins is on the bench. I’d rather not invest in another young gun with offensive potential, since we already score so much. My first idea would be to grab somebody who can immediately contribute 15 minutes of solid inside defense every night.
by bradyk2 on Apr 20, 2008 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well I think the team could get worse, they certainly got worse at the end of the year that was a brutal finish. I can’t really blame the players if they were tired, the fault of that could fall on Nelly.
But also if you can’t stop anyone defensively, that is a problem. So they need a bigman. And it wouldn’t hurt to get a 3-point shooter or two considering the offensive gameplan is fast-breaks and shooting 3-pointers. Keep your best 3-pt shooter on the bench in Bellinelli, that makes a lot of sense.
I’m not saying the team would have been better starting Bellinelli, Baron and Monta were the best players and should play most of the time, but you have a team that can’t utilize their best 3-pt shooter, has Harrington bricking instead, doesn’t have an adequate bench to allow the starters to rest, doesn’t have a strong defensive presence inside, the team isn’t working as it is now is what I am saying.
Therefore, there needs to be some changes. The team needs to find players that can fit the offense. I love that the team has a gimmick in being pretty much the only team who has the run and gun, people say it can’t work to win a championship, I think that is bogus. The Suns probably would have won it all last year with this strategy except for a few bogus calls against the Spurs.
The difference between the Suns last year and the Warriors this year? The Suns had a strong defensive presence in Stoudamire who can also board and run it which the Warriors don’t have. Also some better 3 – pt shooters could really help, the Ukraine olympic team killed our American “dream team” in 2004 because they could bust 3 pounters non-stop. If the Warriors want to have 3-pounters a large part of the offensive plan they need to have guys that can hit it consistently which they don’t have now.
A guy like Glen Rice used to be, just a 3-pount shooter savant would be nice, the problem isn’t getting open for 3-pt shot attempts, its hitting those shots. But I know Glen Rice was a guard, he wouldn’t even get any PT if he was on the team! So you got to get a forward who can hit shots. Jax is ok, a guy like Peja would be great.
So maybe we could use Baron as tradebait, his value is high and I don’t believe he is going to stay healthy in the future, this was a contract year and I don’t trust it.
I think moving him Monta to the pount would work, then moving Bellinelli up the chart, and using the 17 million of cap space on a big man and some better role players. That would be good now and for the future.
If they don’t do that, they are running the risk of having BD get hurt and not being able to move him because his contract is so bloated. The current situation is not working, and I see that as the obvious and best solution.
by runandgun on Apr 20, 2008 2:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
dude.....
I’m not going to pretend to be a basketball expert but…
1) Belinelli doesn’t play because the coaches see him in practice every day and he has problems with his game right now
2) Harrington is our best, if not one of our best 3-point shooters percentage wise while Belinelli (granted in his limited time) is the one chucking bricks. Looks like someone never got over offseason hype.
3) Stoudemire’s defense was not the key to the Suns’ success last year. From what I remember he is a mediocre defender who gets a few spectacular blocks now and then because he can jump high.
by antihero on Apr 21, 2008 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Monta to the pount!!!
Dude, you’ve made yourself amply clear. Now please stop messing with our roster, the spelling of our players’ names, the English language, and common sense.
Make it so!

Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 20, 2008 3:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you’re batting .250, 1 for 4 on the spelling of your names, maybe you should go play for the giants HAHA I’m sure their roster is perfect too. Should be a warning label on all your fossets up there.
by runandgun on Apr 20, 2008 3:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
fossets?
I think you mean faucets. The point is, other than deron williams, there isnt a point guard in the NBA right now who would work better as Monta’s backcourt mate than Baron. He just turned 29 and he’s had some injury issues, but there aren’t many guys in the NBA right now who don’t have their flaws. The leadership Baron brings and his ability to play nellie’s system is invaluable.
by sam23 on Apr 20, 2008 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for translating
I had no idea what that loon was babbling about. I thought he was talking about Justin Forsett, or maybe Jesse Foppert…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 20, 2008 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeez
nelly won’t be back if we let baron go! Please…. lets think this over shall we?
1. BD , Ellis, Jax all take clutch shots and give us the best chance to win ball games.
2. Bellinilli has a lot to prove(need to work on his defense, he looks lost most of the time)
3. Beans is sucha valuable part of our ‘defense’ and he knows how to get rebounds!
4. Al, pietrus expendable for a defense rebounding center in rotation with biedrins or a dominant PF.
—my takes—-
brb, going to ORACLE
by warrior510 on Apr 20, 2008 4:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It
would be so cool to see Brand and Marion play for the dubs… do u guys agree?
brb, going to ORACLE
by warrior510 on Apr 20, 2008 4:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
disagree
we should sign kwame brown since biedrins is lucky everytime he scores.
by saintdee on Apr 20, 2008 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
kwame brown
will be signed by an nba team this offseason because he will dedicate his offseason to practicing dunking the ball with 2 hands.
by misterjennings on Apr 20, 2008 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can anyone tell me if
we can get Brand or J.O’Neal and keeping basically the same roster as this past year, would the salaries not work or something like that?
by warriorsalltheway on Apr 20, 2008 7:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
loon? Most of you think the team doesn’t need to make any moves, just resign what already produced a non-playoff year and I am the loon? Get real.
Can we get Brand or J O’Neal and keep basically the same roster as the past year, would the salaries work? Hmmm, probably a big fat no because of the big fat bloated contract of BD.
I am not hating on BD, I am hating on the contract that is preventing the Warriors from spending money to get the big man they need.
There is no room in the cap, how else are they going to make any moves? Unless they get a lucky lottery pick, I don’t see any light at the end of this tunnel. If they don’t get a lottery pick, they need to do something because the current roster is not working and that’s the bottom line.
What do you people want to hear, that this team as it is right now is going to magically take leaps and bounds in skill, consistency and defense and be able to compete with the Lakers, Suns, Spurs, Hornets,
by runandgun on Apr 20, 2008 8:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
try hitting the reply option
when you want to reply to a specific post. I’m assuming you were responding to Sleepy. Your argument is flawed because the team CAN make leaps and bounds without making a major aquisition. The development of Wright is crucial to the franchise with or without a blockbuster trade. I think we are still a piece or two away next year even if he does make strides, but the stand pat line of thinking makes more sense than blowing the whole thing up. I think we’d all like to see Brand in a Warriors uni, but if you add him and subtract Baron I dont think the team is any better and is likely worse. PG is the most important position in this system, it wouldnt work without a stud there. Baron’s size, decion making (not always good, but it works here for the most part) defense, and ability to penetrate are critical for the success of Jack, Monta and the whole team. Maybe we could replace him (by moving up in the draft to nab Mayo or maybe Livingston are the only legit options I’ve heard so far) but its not likely. Monta is not a point guard yet and will probably never truly be one. Baron is a near perfect compliment to him. Why tear that apart? I’m a fan of Harrington but I dont think his production will ever match his salary, so I think offseason trade ideas should start with him, not Baron. Unless we can make a trade that brings us a quality replacement for Baron AND a big guy, its not worth considering. Lets not get irrational because we finished a couple games short of a playoff birth. Re-sign Beans and Monta. Baron and Nellie will come back. Keep captain Jack. Develop Wright. Offer Buike a reasonable salary and pursue some other low priced free agents that can contribute off the bench and see if someone will bite on Al’s considerable potential in a trade.
by sam23 on Apr 20, 2008 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Loons are cool
Check it out, the common loon:
And yes, you are loon, for
1. Saying we should “dump BD” without elaborating for whom, or admitting the painful short-term consequences of such a move.
2. Saying Biedrins is “average at best.”
3. Backtracking and re-framing what you said when people called you on it.
4. Writing “Monte.”
5. Implying that anyone who disagrees with you doesn’t understand that the Warriors are not a championship team as constituted, and need to make some moves.
Indeed, “loon” may be too good for the shenanigans you’re up to in this thread. You should quit while you’re ahead…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok you are down from .250 to .200 now, you are moved from 5th to 7th in the Giants battling order.
2. Single: MontA is pronounced Monte, so whatever, I know what it was, I’m just not proofreading.
1. Strike out: I did elaborate on “dumping BD”, you said I have made my point amply clear and now you say I don’t elaborate? What? Who’s the loon now?
3. Ground out: I do believe Biedrins is an average player. He may improve, he is young still, but as of now he is average. I’m not drinking the water on this guy like you may be.
4. Strike out swinging: “Backtracking and re-framing”, I prefer to call it communicating with people, clarifying, you know, what a converstation might consist of.
5: Ground into double play: And yes, the team is not a championship team right now, is that news to anyone? Or did they just win the Chamionship and I missed it. Maybe in your mind they are the best team every year regardless of record or whether they make the playoffs or not. Buy some bottled water, that tap is dangerous.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Battling order"
Nah, in that regard, I’m lead-off all the way…
Per your 2-1-3-4-5 order:
2. Actually, it’s not pronounced “Monte” or “Monta.” If anything, you should spell it “Monteigh.”
1. I am the LOON. I already said loons were cool. You should have worn that mantle with pride.
3. You can “believe” what you want about AB, so long as you ignore the numbers. By PER, Biedrins was the 7th best center in the NBA, at the tender age of 22. He was also #1 in the NBA in FG% and #3 in rebounds per minute. Those don’t scream “average” to me. Also, just so you don’t think I’m a hard-hearted number geek: anecdotally, AB busts his ass on the court more than pretty much any player on the team. He and Monta were the most consistent players on the team down the stretch.
4. You say potato…
5. Straw man alert. Yes, my fellow GSoMers will all attest that I’m an incorrigible homer who thinks the Ws are “the best team every year.” Yep, that’s me. “We are the Chamions”: that’s my motto.
As for your claims that the Bay Area water is addling our brains (and that your distance gives you some special perspective): in the 2+ years I’ve been posting on this site, I’ve been living in Tokyo and New York. Must be the green tea and the Brooklyn Lager… ;-)
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as Biedrins goes, here is the scounting report on him from an unbiased source, Hoopshype.com:
A high-energy player… Very good athlete… Good shot blocker… Good rebounder… Runs the floor well… Not much offensive game… Terrible from the charity stripe.
Ok, not much offesive game, ouch. But wait a minute, he had the highest FG% in the leauge, how did he do that with “Not much offensive game”? Because he gets fed very well by Baron and Monteigh and gets the occansional garbage put back which I am fine with but lets be real, he is not a player that can create his own shots, he needs others around him to help him with that. Not like guys that have offensive game that can create their own shots.
It says he is a good rebounder and shot blocker, what 7-0 guy isn’t? What Center isn’t? Good athlete, definately I would agree for a big man he is a good athlete, everything considered I say with that and him having not much offensive game I say he is average.
What straw man? I basically repeated what you said, I didn’t make that up.
About the water, well maybe if you live there once your brain is permanently set to “homer” and it sticks for life, I don’t know, but I have friends in my city who are 49er and Giants fans and they are some of the worst homers I have seen. That’s not the mention Raiders fans who are notoriously some of the worst homer fans in sports, something about that city …...
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
asdf
As far as Biedrins goes, here is the scounting report on him from an unbiased source, Hoopshype.com: A high-energy player… Very good athlete… Good shot blocker… Good rebounder… Runs the floor well… Not much offensive game… Terrible from the charity stripe.
Er, even allowing that whatever random blogger wrote that is “unbiased,” nowhere does he say AB is “average at best.”
Ok, not much offesive game, ouch. But wait a minute, he had the highest FG% in the leauge, how did he do that with "Not much offensive game"? Because he gets fed very well by Baron and Monteigh and gets the occansional garbage put back which I am fine with but lets be real, he is not a player that can create his own shots, he needs others around him to help him with that. Not like guys that have offensive game that can create their own shots.
All well and good (other than the spelling) but none of it supports the argument that AB is “average at best.”
It says he is a good rebounder and shot blocker, what 7-0 guy isn’t? What Center isn’t?
Heh. Too many to choose from, but just for fun, how ‘bout Eddy Curry?
Career Rebounds/36 minutes: 7.5 (compare to AB’s 11.7)
Career Blocks/36 minutes: 1.1 (compare to AB’s 1.9)
Really, what part of #7 among NBA centers in PER and #3 among all NBA players in rebounds per minute do you not understand?
Good athlete, definately I would agree for a big man he is a good athlete, everything considered I say with that and him having not much offensive game I say he is average.
Again, “you say.” I don’t believe you. And I doubt you’ve converted many others.
What straw man? I basically repeated what you said, I didn’t make that up.
Um yeah. Show me one post in my GSoM history where I suggested that the Warriors are anywhere close to a great team.
About the water, well maybe if you live there once your brain is permanently set to "homer" and it sticks for life, I don’t know, but I have friends in my city who are 49er and Giants fans and they are some of the worst homers I have seen. That’s not the mention Raiders fans who are notoriously some of the worst homer fans in sports, something about that city ……
Whatever you say, Mr. Objectivity… XD
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Retraction: I reread what you wrote about the Warriors being a Championship team and I see you were being sarcastic, I misinterpreted what you said there point #5 looks like a sacrifice bunt and not a strike out. 1 for 4, that’s a little better. But that also doesn’t do much for your overall arguement, if you don’t think they are a championship team as it is right now, then why are you not on board with making some moves to make it that way?
The source for that evaluation of Biedrins was not a blogger, it was hoopshype.com which is a pretty big and reputable website. I couldn’t find any other public scouting reports, if you have one I would be happy to see it.
You didn’t get “average at best” from that scouting report? I guess you can see what you want to see, good rebounder and good shot blockers are almost like prerequisites for the job. Its like saying Smoosh Parker has good speed and good dribbling skills, that doesn’t make him a good pount guard, those are prerequisites to the position. All centers are tall and if you have at least average athleticism and are tall you will get some rebounds and blocked shots, that’s nothing to write home about.
I don’t know what stats you are looking at, but from yahoo sports:
Points
Biedrins 10.5
League Average 8.3
League Leader 25.2
Rebounds
Biedrins 9.8
League Average 5.9
League Leader 14.2
Blocks:
Biedrins 1.2
League Average 0.9
League Leader 3.6
I believe these stats also factor in centers that are on peoples bench. If you are saying he is an above average center compared to all centers that are in the NBA including bench players then I would agree with that, but compared to other starting centers I stick by my evaluation “average at best’.
Plus his scoring stats are helped by Baron and Monta’s superior ability to find him and his rebounds are helped because the Warriors play a fast paced game with more shots taken and more opportunities for rebounds, if Boozer played on our team he would probably average more rebounds then he already does, its just a different style of game, the numbers will be inflated in this style of play.
I don’t have to convert anybody, everyone already thinks he is average outside of the bay area, being near that water does something to the brain, is there a nuclear powerplant dumping waste into the bay or something? Call Erin Brockovich, she may have a big case on her hands, all your posts on this thread can be exhibit A.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
LOL
if you don’t think they are a championship team as it is right now, then why are you not on board with making some moves to make it that way?
I am on board with them making moves. I’ve never said otherwise. If you look back through my posts, you’ll “retract” yourself once again.
I couldn’t find any other public scouting reports, if you have one I would be happy to see it.
Here’s one from Adam Lauridsen—one of the most knowledgeable, objective and insightful Warriors analysts going:
It’s safe to call 07-08 Andris’ breakout season given that (1) he put up fantastic numbers while largely exhausted from two years of non-stop basketball and (2) the performance will earn him a ton of money with his new contract. Still, during my most blindly optimistic moments, I get the sense there could be even better things to come.
good rebounder and good shot blockers are almost like prerequisites for the job. Its like saying Smoosh Parker has good speed and good dribbling skills, that doesn’t make him a good pount guard, those are prerequisites to the position. All centers are tall and if you have at least average athleticism and are tall you will get some rebounds and blocked shots, that’s nothing to write home about.
Actually, no it isn’t like saying Smoosh, or even Smush, has good speed and good dribbling skills. Andris is more than decent at rebounding—he’s fantastic. Once again, because you seem to have problems finding basic statistics on the internet (click on the numbers for links to the relevant web pages):
• #7 among all NBA centers in PER
• #1 among all NBA players in FG%
• #3 among all NBA players in rebounds per minute
Meanwhile, you gotta love your utter cluelessness about how to use numbers. The numbers you post clearly show that Biedrins is far better than “league-average” ... so your response is basically, “wahhh, this can’t be right!” For the record, any numbers you post without statistical context (minutes played, e.g.) are totally worthless. Biedrins averaged only 27.4 minutes a game this year, as close to bench numbers as starter’s numbers. Rather than “guesstimate” how he compares to his peers, why not look at the hard numbers I provided, that account for minutes played and compare apples to apples?
the numbers will be inflated in this style of play.
The one true statement in your entire post … though I doubt the numbers are nearly as inflated as you think. The Ws were a better, more efficient team with Biedrins on the floor. He’s a fantastic rebounder and incredibly efficient player. As JAE always says, if it’s so easy to shoot 60% from the floor, why doesn’t everybody do it?
Plus his scoring stats are helped by Baron and Monta’s superior ability to find him
Indeed, I hadn’t realized that Baron and Monta, #7 and #35 the league in assists, respectively, are the only players in the NBA capable of setting up a big man. Thanks for the info.
I don’t have to convert anybody, everyone already thinks he is average outside of the bay area.
Find me one. I check out a Celtics’ blog regularly, in which one of the smartest guys on the site said Biedrins was a total stud—the only big man he’d seen all year who was too quick for KG to guard on the pick-and-roll.
Is there a nuclear powerplant dumping waste into the bay or something? Call Erin Brockovich, she may have a big case on her hands, all your posts on this thread can be exhibit A.
LOL, it’s funnier each time you repeat it. It’s especially “funny” given that I clearly stated that I don’t live in the Bay Area. Call Hooked-on-Phonics, I think they may have a big customer on their hands…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
blah blah blah, this is getting repetitive and I don’t know how to clip your posts to respond to every statement like you do. But I like how the analyst you quoted is from san francisco. Get someone from the national media. And not a blogger, I am sure I could find many guys on Lakers or Suns boards that say he is average, that doesn’t mean much. “Not much offensive game”, that is not a ringing endorsement.
About the stats, he doesn’t have a good jumper so he only really shoots layups or dunks, your FG% is going to be up when you do that. 7th in the league in rebounds per minute, that is good, and the OBJECTIVE analyst I quoted not from San Francisco wrote that he was a good rebounder. Good, that is one aspect of his game that is good, so give him a + mark on that one. I didn’t even know what PER was until you posted it. I looked it up and it is some complicated formula compiling all the stats into one stat. I have never heard that in my lifetime of watching hundreds of basketball games and too many hours of ESPN to estimate. Shows how valuable commentators and espn anaylsts think it is in that they NEVER mention it EVER. If you need to quote and completely convaluted stat to support your case then that is a red flag of the weakness of your case in itself, just use the regular stats.
Also, if Biedrins is so good, why in the world would he play only 27 minutes a night? Rasheed Wallace doesn’t play 27 minutes, Stoudamire doesn’t, even “average” centers play more then that, what is the deal?
If you have admitted that the team is not a Championship team as of now, what is your remedy to fix it? I have offered many possible solutions that take into account the team has to work within a salary cap. If you don’t like any of the moves I have suggested, what would you propose?
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you've never heard of PER?
That’s funny, I only started watching basketball a few years ago and I’ve heard plenty of analyst quote PER stats.
by the wingless one on Apr 21, 2008 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, never. I am going to watch for it during the playoffs now to see, but I have never heard that. Do they say it like PER, or do they say the letters like P.E.R. ? Do they say PER number, PER value, what? I havn’t heard anything like that.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They say it like...
P-E-R spelled out. Funny enough I just headed over to ESPN.com and the first article I read referred to PER…http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-32-78/The-2008-TrueHoop-Stat-Geek-Smackdown.html
by the wingless one on Apr 21, 2008 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
except you
really haven’t offered anything feasible other than don’t sign biedrins and baron… if biedrins is as average as you say he has no worth outside the bay so we can keep him for cheap right?
and you want to sell Baron high? for what? a PF right? who is going to trade their allstar PF to us? Clippers? Brand for Baron? is that your great suggestion?
by saintdee on Apr 21, 2008 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well at the risk of making myself even more redundant and “amply clear” on the moves I want to make as another poster said, I’ll just give the recap so you don’t have to reread everything.
Yes, sell high on Baron. I didn’t say don’t sign Biedrins and Baron. Do a sign and trade on Baron. I would like a bigman who can play some defense and also fit in the system. Don’t ask me who, I don’t know every team situation, I do know that a good point guard is valuable and that Baron definately has value. There are 29 other teams, Mullins needs to chat up the ones who might be in need of a point guard.
Then move Monta to point guard. Move Belinelli up the depth chart to shooting guard along with Azubuke, possibly pick up another guard free agent to fill that roster spot.
then with Harrington if you can trade him and aquire someone that can help you, a Center, a better shooting forward then he is, a guard to fill that spot just mentioned, something, if it makes sense do it because Harrington doesn’t fit the system and he is overpaid.
I am thinking of salary cap here, don’t get me wrong, I love Baron and think he’s great, but from a business perspective I think this makes sense.
If they shop Baron around and they cannot get a deal that makes sense then keep him. Start the season with him and see how it goes. If it goes well (better position then last year) and the young guys develop like people hope for and they have a legit chance to contend for a championship then let it ride. If not, then you have to think about trading Baron before the deadline to a bubble team who is willing to give up something good to get a great point guard.
I didn’t say don’t sign Biedrins or Baron, I think they should sign Baron. I think they should also sign Biedrins as long as he does not break the bank, I don’t know what kind of money they are expecting to pay him, but he shouldn’t be paid like the top big men in the league, if he wants that money at some point you have to consider letting him walk. That’s just business.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh
I didn’t even know what PER was until you posted it. I looked it up and it is some complicated formula compiling all the stats into one stat. I have never heard that in my lifetime of watching hundreds of basketball games and too many hours of ESPN to estimate [...] If you need to quote and completely convaluted stat to support your case then that is a red flag of the weakness of your case in itself, just use the regular stats.
“Regular stats”: LOL. I imagine you’re also not a big fan of phony baloney baseball stats like “OPS+” and “ERA+” Give me wins, homers, batting average, and good ol’ counting numbers, I say!
Actually, now I’m wondering you aren’t just yanking all of our chains. You can’t possibly have followed hoops for this long and not even heard of PER, can you? I mean, it’s far from a perfect metric, but it is pretty useful shorthand; and most people who are remotely serious about hoops have at least heard of it.
Assuming you’re being sincere, here’s what I would propose to you: that before showing off your ignorance in a public forum, you make a concerted effort to:
1. Learn and understand basic statistical analysis.
2. Read people’s posts carefully before replying to them.
Until then, it’s kind of like I’m Andris Biedrins and you’re an eight-year old kid trying to drive on me. SWAT. Next time, come prepared with a little statistical knowledge, and leave that weak sauce for the schoolyard…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, that was a huge dodge. If you are Biedrins then I am Boozer just abusing and overpowering you. I gave you the open lane and dared you to drive it when I asked for your suggestions on what you would do for the team and you did the equivilant of: Consiering it, then setting the ball on the court, saying you are too good for me and walking out. That’s pretty cowardly.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh
A boozer, possibly. Carlos Boozer, not so much…
Honestly, dude, I don’t think I’m a particularly great hoops analyst, but I am kind of too good for you. It’s not cowardly not to bother talking hoops with someone who doesn’t understand numbers, command his native language, or listen to reason. It’s just common sense.
Despite all these flaws, if you seemed capable of admitting even the slightest flaw in your reasoning, or seeing the slightest grain of truth in mine, I think I could converse with you respectfully. Keep at it!
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
tell yourself whatever you want to believe buddy.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe
We should see how narrow we can make this column, Then when we get to the end, we can shake hands and smoke a peace pipe. Deal?
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about we use our energy to root for the to dominance in 08-09. I think that’s an idea we can all get behind. Peace.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well?
how narrow we can make this column?
finally something interesting…
by Skeptic con Urquell on Apr 22, 2008 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
lesser
dunno, some useless info I guess?
by Skeptic con Urquell on Apr 22, 2008 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta get away
I need a holiday
by Skeptic con Urquell on Apr 22, 2008 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You hit the limit!
Now let the hand-shaking and peace-pipe smoking begin…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 22, 2008 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hit the limit
Yeah, Huhu. I backed it down like ShaqDaddy.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Apr 22, 2008 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
runandgun i'm with you
First of all Mullin made a mistake by trading away the heart and soul of this team. If we had JRich this year we would be seeing the Warriors playing the Hornets as the 7th seed. He was the most productive 3 pt shooter in the league 243 to be exact at 41%. He would of gave Baron and Jackson at least 10 minutes less playing time and more rest for the post season run. I’m sure Monta would have still developed his game, but as a 6th man off the bench. We would be able to match any offers but I think if his playing time was reduced, his stats would have resulted in us matching a contract probably 2-3 million less/year. We would probably be matching Biedrins contract and trying to trade Al/Pietrus for a salary room. We wouldn’t have Brandon Wright, but could pick up in the offseason a second tier rebounder like a Reggie Evans or Carl Landry to fill in until we get lucky in the draft and find our future PF. Cost cutting move, but the Warriors would have made more than enough to cover by making the playoffs and keeping last year’s team intact. Even Nellie said this years team wasn’t as good as last years. When do you think Brandon Wright will start dominating Stoudamire, Boozer, and Duncan?
by shootda3 on Apr 20, 2008 11:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Think about the future though
I miss JRich. We all do. But would it be worth the success this year to lose Monta Ellis next year? Because if we kept Richardson, we lose Monta and/or biedrins. I love JRich, always will. But it wasn’t worth that sacrifice.
by bradyk2 on Apr 21, 2008 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
J-Rich
would probably have gotten us the 7th seed. You are probably right about that.
But then what? Are you saying that with him here this year we’d be a championship contender? I know that B-Wright didn’t make us a contender this year, but look at the long-term.
Now we get to keep Ellis and Biedrins and have young PF with a high ceiling to develop. All 3 are 22 or under. I don’t know if those 3 will win a championship down the line. But I like what I see right now and can imagine it working out nicely in the near future.
I know J-Rich shot the ball great this year. But would he have put up the same numbers on the Dubz? He was the featured guy in Charlotte’s offense this year because he was their best option. Wallace can’t shoot and Okafor is ineffective unless within 5 feet of the basket. Aside from shooting many 3’s, J-Rich is good at posting up and shooting a turnaround jumper. The Dubz feature Baron, Jax and Monta as the ballhandlers in their offense because in addition to their own shots, they can create for others (pick and roll, drive and dish). Would I rather have J-Rich take those open 3’s instead of Buike? Sure, but not when his salary is 5-6 times more.
by misterjennings on Apr 21, 2008 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
JRich would’ve gotten us in the playoffs, but then Monta’s possibly gone and we’re screwed over.
by bradyk2 on Apr 21, 2008 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
but then some guys on here would start posting about how we would be better off without Monta because he is not a good defender and never going to be able to play the point and blah blah.
The point is you can’t have it all. You give and you take. Monta & Biedrins > J-Rich.
by misterjennings on Apr 21, 2008 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget: And they conveniently forget that JRich is at best a mediocre defender.
It never occurred to me that one man could play with the faith of 50 million.
by imovermyhead on Apr 21, 2008 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so you would rather
have Reggie Evans or Carl Landry over B-Wright?
So when will those guys start dominating Stoudamire, Boozer and Duncan?
Even you are looking at the future when you said to pick up those 2nd tier guys as a stop-gap “until we get lucky in the draft and find our future PF.” I believe we’ve found our future PF already in Wright.
After he puts on some weight and gains strength, he will be a good, productive PF for many years.
by misterjennings on Apr 21, 2008 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok some support, that is nice, thanks for that. Yeah it broke my heart too when JRich left, seems like they should have figured out a way to keep him even if it meant letting someone else go. But if it truly was Monta or JRich I would have to go with Monta because he is younger, so maybe no avoiding that one, I don’t know all the details there. They still have good pieces and I agree with another poster, they are only a move or 2 away from putting the puzzle together.
I don’t agree that Monta can’t be the point. I don’t know why that is assumed that he can’t play that position. Usually you say that about taller guards that are good shooters, those guys like Kobe or JRich. Monta is not a classic shooting guard, he is small, fast, has great handles and vision, he has all the skills to be a point guard. Maybe he doesn’t have the experience at that spot yet, I think he probably needs to develop and learn that position more, but I think he could be great at it. With how deadly of a shooter he is he would get so much attention when he penetrates and then he could bust the shot or dish and give Biedrins an easy basket like he gets or Harringont for the open 3 pt shot brick, that seems to make perfect sense, where am I wrong here?
Then with the money that frees up get a big man that can contend with Boozer, Duncan, Stoudamire. Because as of now I don’t think Biedrins or Wright will be able to do that. I see them having problems with guys like Gasol and even Chandler too. Some people are talking about just having them beef up in the offseason. I am all for that, but the problem is that getting them to beef up is not something that we just discovered would help them. We already knew putting on some weight would be good for their games. They had all of last offseason to do that and they didn’t. Maybe they can’t. Some guys just don’t have the metabolism for it. I hope they do. I hope I am wrong about that. But I don’t think I am.
I want to disagree that Monta and BD are not good together because they are too similar and take points away from each other which I think is partly true, but before I get angry replies, I take that back because the offense was the highest scoring in the league, so I can’t really say that. The defense is the problem. We don’t need to be the Pistons, just middle of the road defense could work.
But I would take a downgrade from BD to a guy like Bibby or Monta at the point if it meant that they could add a guy like Brand. I think a move like that may hurt the offense slightly, but would could improve the defense dramatically. Couple that move with dumping Harrington in favor of a forward that can actually shoot 3-pounters like Peja Stouakovich and I think the team would be sitting pretty. But probably guys like Peja, forwards who can shoot 3’s don’t grow on trees, so don’t know how possible that would be….
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 9:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yes but how would
a downgrade from BD to Monta at the point net us a Brand?
There are no unrestricted big men out there who are game changers this year.
Guys in their early 20’s with high metabolism typically do not fill out their frame until their mid 20’s. That is not to say Wright hasn’t gained any because he has since last offseason. They say he’s already added 15 pounds. He is going to continue to get bigger and stronger. Even baseball players taking B-12 in the butt took years to get bigger but it will happen.
I understand that you want a low post force like Brand and a deadly sharpshooter like Peja on the Warriors. But with what we have to offer, it simply is not that easy to obtain.
Tell me why would the Clips give up on Brand to get Davis even if they were evenly valued in terms of money? Why would the Hornets want Harrington when they have West and Peja is lights out?
I want the things you want. But you have to be realistic. Hell I want to trade Biedrins for Tim Duncan because Biedrins will never be the best bigman of an era. But it is going to happen? No. So just cheer for what we have and that is young guys with loads of potential that are still developing.
Go check out the free agent list. Freeing Baron off the books and you can get another Barron. Earl Barron that is.
by misterjennings on Apr 21, 2008 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
who is this mythical big man you speak of?
That can challenge Boozer, Duncan, Stoudamire, et al? Getting rid of BD/Beans does not mean we find a superb big man hiding under a rock somewhere.
As for Biedrins, I can understand not totally appreciating his value if you only get to see him once in awhile. He is valuable because he never gives up on the play and yes Monta and BD do take a lot of the attention and are good at getting him the ball BUT he is also great at cutting to the basket and making sure he is ready and available to receive the basketball and finish the play.
by the wingless one on Apr 21, 2008 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
HAHA, yeah, I didn’t mean to say that we can trade Harrington for Peja they would not do that, just that Harrington doesn’t really fit the team because they use him as a 3-pt shooter and he can’t shoot 3’s, so get someone that can, not necessarily Peja, don’t know if there are any guys out there that could fit the bill and that the Warriors could obtain, but there are a lot of players out there, seems like they could work something out somewhere.
Also, not necessarily Brand, but that type of bigman. Again, I know guys like that don’t grow on trees, but we do have BD to offer up, he is valuable, I don’t know if the Clippers would be interested or what, but maybe some team would be interested.
Good info about Wright, I didn’t know he put on weight like that. We’ll see how much more weight he can put on. It really surprises me that he was actually skinnier before, I saw him during one of the suns game next to Shaq and he looked anorexic. But yeah I hope he continues to gain weight, if him and Biedrins could do that of course I am all in favor.
But that is still a big “IF”, I don’t have complete confidence in that. If waiting for them to gain weight is the plan they should get a stop gap like Ronny Turiaf, he didn’t even make a million this year, maybe we could get him for cheap.
I’m not saying that getting rid of BD’s contract would automatically net us a bigman that we need, but I think it is a necessary step to clear the cap room to get a good bigman that will also have a fairly high salary. Maybe it would be a trade if like you said there are no free agents like that. Or if no one is interested in a trade, then of course just don’t dump Baron outright, that would be stupid, I say shop him around, if no takers then get a stopgap like Turiaf and then see how the year goes and keep eyes open for possibilities to fix the D and acquire a good 3 pt shooter. They need to make some moves is what I am saying, and BD is a expendable because they have Monta and also necessary to clear the cap space to get another guy. Please don’t angrily reply, I like BD, just a business move.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 10:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Also quick question, I was doing a google search for players salaries and I see that Bibby has a fairly high salary as well so I retract my suggestion of downgrading BD to a guy like Bibby so they can clear cap space for a bigman. I assumed Bibby made like 8 or 9 million and I was incorrect about that.
Also during my search, I saw that on the Warriors payroll for this year and next year is a guy named Adonal Foyle. It says the Warriors are paying him just about 10 million for each of the next 2 seasons. But he is on another team now making 1.5 million. Is that correct or was that a misprint? Hoopshype.com was the source.
by runandgun on Apr 21, 2008 10:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
we still owe Foyle
millions of dollars. He was guaranteed and was bought out so his salary doesn’t come off the books until his contract is up.
by misterjennings on Apr 21, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Foyle buyout
I forget the exact terms now (and I can’t seem to find it by googling) but I know that Foyle, in his infinite gentlemanliness, agreed to a buyout figure well below the 2/$19.6M remaining on his deal, and well below the generally accepted terms for a buyout. Don’t quote me, but I think the final cap number might have been as low as half that 2/$19.6M.
On the downside, if we had kept Foyle, he’d now have a fair amount of value as an expiring contract. (For a recent example of the value of expiring contracts, see Kwame and change for Pau Gasol.) We might even have used him in a deal for Brand.
On the bright side, the terms of the buyout do give us more flexibility in the re-signing of Monta, Beans, Buki, and MP2. Yin yang…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 21, 2008 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foyle salary is still big
Foyle was under contract for $29.25 million over the next three seasons (from 2007 – 2009). But the Warriors had an option to buy out the final year of Foyle’s contract for $1million (which they would have no doubt done which would have reduced the contract total to 19.7 million). Foyle agreed to accept $13 million of the $19.7 million he was due in order to get out of his contract. With the $13million payoff, Foyle’s salary accounts for $5.9million of this season’s salary cap, which saved the Warriors $3 million based on Foyle’s presettlement salary.
Next season, Foyle will count $6.4 million against the cap—(a savings of $3.4 million of the presettlement salary). He gets the remaining $700,000 or so in the 2009 – 2010 season.
So, either way you cut it, it’s still a big chunk of change that could be way better spent on adding some depth to the bench. I don’t think I’ll ever feel good about the Warriors’ ability to snag and retain talent as long as Mullin is the one writing the contracts because the Foyle contract was his baby.
by centerre on Apr 21, 2008 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Baron
will not opt out this offseason contrary to what some think.
He has 17 million reasons not to. The Warriors will most likely only sign Monta and Biedrins to long term deals and let Baron play out his option year.
It works out for both parties. Baron gets to stay motivated and it would be another contract year at unrestricted status. Warriors get to see how their young guys are developing and whether anybody is available on the market that could match or exceed Baron’s contributions. If there are, then I’m sure they would not re-sign Baron after next year because he would be 30 and towards the end of his prime.
If after next season, Wright and whoever they draft this year are legit then they will probably re-sign Baron to a 3-4 year deal and he can then call it a career.
by misterjennings on Apr 21, 2008 10:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
愛或恨?
Anywho…
While I wouldn’t call Biedrins “average,” I wouldn’t necessarily throw a bucket of money at him either. The guy can obviously give us a lot of double-doubles, and while is as skinny as all get-up, he plays great defense. If anything, he gets called for a lot of phantom fouls. That said, it was a bit disconcerting when he was reluctant to post-up Steve Nash in one of those end-of-season debacles. Post-ups aren’t really in keeping with the ‘Dubs style, so I guess that it’s not too big of a concern. He’s tall, talented, and young, so he is going to command a relatively big salary.
I too have my concerns about Baron’s health and salary. The guy is flat-out fun to watch. As much as I would love to see the Warriors go deep into the playoffs etc., right now I’m pretty content with their entertainment value. I would much rather watch the Warriors of the past couple of seasons than the Spurs, Jazz, Pistons, or other, IMHO, boring teams.
The Warriors certainly do not play great defense per se, but they get a lot of steals and blocks, and for the most part play clean. The team that are supposed great defensive squads like the Spurs and Jazz play hard and dirty (ie. Bowen and Boozer). Those guys get away with murder, while guys like Biedrins continually get shafted by the refs ‘cause they are young and don’t have the rep yet.
And don’t get me wrong, I love Nellie, but I wouldn’t mind seeing him hand over the reins to say, Keith Smart. If we do stay pretty much pat with the roster, then we need to start playing the young guys. I don’t buy the argument that Nellie is going to change his style all of a sudden and start playing Wright et al next year. With the benefit of hindsight, we really should have played Wright a lot more. Bellinelli can be a solid contributor as well. For some reason there is a lot of hate for a guy who got very little PT and virtually no chance to get comfortable.
Keep the roster pretty much intact, add a couple a solid bench players if you can, play the young guys more, and don’t get in Nellie’s way if he wants to go back to playing golf in Maui. Other than that, just enjoy the fact that the Warriors are the most exciting/entertaining team in the league. Tim Duncan baseline jumpers off the backboard might win, but watching “big fundamentals” is, as George Carlin would say, “Like watching two flies @#$%.”
by Snesley Wipes on Apr 24, 2008 3:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















