Harping on the JRich Trade
This is my first-time post, and I've only been reading GSoM for a few months now, so I figured instead of throwing up a crazy trade idea I'd get a thread going on the other topic everyone seems so opinionated about.
The dreaded JRich draft-day trade.....
I gotta admit that I'm getting a little annoyed with everybody thinkin that we shouldn't have traded Jason last year, and how we would have/ could have/ should have been a better team with him on the roster this year. And before anybody jumps all over me, let me state that JRich was the sole reason a lot of us were Warrior fans in those lean years, and he carried us through some tough times. I love the guy to death, and he deserved to be treated with more respect than how things went down. Unfortunately, the NBA, as well as this fan site, is much, much more of a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately type of place. Respect and loyalty holds almost no weight in comparison to results and money.
So on that note, the JRich trade was the correct move, regardless of whether or not BWright developes into a 20 ppg player. Let me explain why....
With JRich on the roster this year, our "big 3" wouldn't have magically become the 'big4'. Monta Ellis' growth would innevitably have been stunted, because he simply wouldn't have gotten the touches or even the minutes to do the things he did this year. Jax wouldn't have been as effective, as he would have been playing power forward half the time and also getting less touches. Even JRich wouldn't have put up close to the numbers he did in Charlotte this year, because he wouldn't have had a chance to put up 18 shots a game. All this is a huge reason why he was deemed expendable.
On top of it, he is 27 years old and had just come off a season partially lost due to a knee injury that was taking forever to heal. Yes, he did play all 82 games this year, but at this time last year everyone was still worried about his injury history. At his position, and the way he plays, as soon as he cant elevate off the floor his career will be all but over.
As if all of the above wasn't enough of a reason to trade him, between him, Baron, Jax and Al, they were making a lot of money (I think about 80%of the payroll). We needed to cut some costs, and its been to do this early rather than too late, when you cant get any value for your guys.
And to boot, we were about to completely drop his contract on another team (something that rarely happens in the NBA these days) AND get a big-time prospect at a position of need.
In the end, to me, the trade makes a heck of a lot of sense, and realistically doesn't need any defending. The Warriors 06-07 roster wasn't going to get any farther than it did, and realistically shouldn't have gotten that far. Our 07-08 team was a better team, despite the fact that it was more of a rebuilding year for us. How can we look at this years team and say it was a failure? We won 6 more games in a conference that saw improvements from a bunch of other teams. Our future is much brighter now than it would be if we didnt trade JRich, and we wouldn't have been better this year with him.
Objections?
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
151 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This has been rehashed endlessly
Essentially, the ‘06/’07 team was together, free of injuries, for two months and they made history. Then, Mullin split them up.
I would’ve liked to have seen them together for one more year. See what they could do. I actually think the players would’ve liked that too, listening to them talk.
How either team would’ve done is conjecture. But all the “future” talk in the world is meaningless to Warriors fans. We’ve been talking about the future for the Warriors since 1993 and I think we deserved one more year of “the present.”
by chacabuco on May 12, 2008 3:35 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
the present
is over rated… look at the mavs and the suns… invest in the future not in the present.
The Future vs. The Present
You have to be able to mix the old and young, which meant either JR or Harrington had to go last year, and our glaring lack of PF/C, and our abundance of SG/SF made more sense to trade JR.
This team outperformed last years team, so I can’t say that we didn’t get another year of “the present”. It isn’t like the team took a step back. Right?
by passionately objective on May 12, 2008 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I love you.
I can say that right.
I agree with everything you’ve written, and probably better worded than what I would have done.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
I miss JR.
I cried when we traded him. He was a top 3 Warrior all time for me. I however do believe that we would’ve won at least a game with him in the roster when S. Jax was suspended. JR’s clutch ability and driving ability was also excellent. People forget that Baron and JR was one of the best backcourts in their season when they were together, and that was with a worse supporting cast. I honestly loved J-Rich to death and would’ve wanted Baron or Monta to go instead of him.
crazy man
i loved jrich too. but trading monta away would have been dumb and baron is personally one of my fav pg’s in the league. prolly should have traded harrington while he was hot.
JR over BD and Monta?
That’s what gets franchises into trouble. Can’t get too nostalgic or else you’ll go down.
by passionately objective on May 12, 2008 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Monta's
current value was certainly not as high as last years. Monta, was the last piece Minny wanted before almsot trading KG to us.
But JR’s devotion and love to the team was unmatched by any Warrior in recent history (w/ Foyle being next). And thats why I love him more then Baron and Monta. Like I said in another diary, JR was our Kobe for half the decade.
uhm.
Since when did I say skill wise too? What is with you people? And the keyword is that I said for “me”
My Favorite (Top) 3 (No Order):
Manute Bol
Jason Richardson
Wilt Chamberlin
And why you gotta lay insults? Are you that immature? e-thug maybe?
If JRich is in your top 3, you must either be very young or not have a very good memory
Mullin
Hardaway
Richmond
Barry
Just to name a few. I’m sure there are plenty of others, but I don’t want to waste any more time on this topic. JRich was good, and he was the only good thing about the Warriors for a while, but there’s just too much history for him to be top 3 in my book or many others’ books.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 14, 2008 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions
.
The fact that I’ve met 2 of my top 3 a is a huge factor in that. All 3 of their out of basketball work is what inspired me as well all 3 had great characters too. And for me alot of times Character > Skill.
-Manute Bol (who was there during the TMC run) is extremely active with Sudanese rights and has done several Humanitarian efforts with them including the Sudan Freedom Walk.
-Jason Richardson’s commitment to the team was astounding. No one since I could remember for the Warriors had that much commitment to an organization. Apologizing for not making to the playoffs shows a level of maturity that does not exist for the majority of NBA players.
-Wilt Chamberlain. My relatives love and fan fare of him rubbed off on me. I’ve read his autobiography as well.
dubs fan made my point for me
I wasnt talking about skill, but I was seriously asking are you like 12 years old or what because youre leaving a lot of truly great warriors out of your top 3 if you put JRich in there. It wasnt an insult, it was a serious question. I’m not a fan of hurling actual insults around on here, but you have to be able to take a little criticism, if youre that sensitive dont psost.
Common Sense
How would a 12 year old know this much even if the kid is brainwashed with Warrior propaganda? Why would a 12 year old be posting on an online blog in the middle of the day when he’s supposed to be in school? Would a 12 year old kid type perfectly while arguing and have at least good sentence structure and punctuation?
Truly the mentality and maturity in which you rationalize on the basis of poor evidence or corroboration is making me feel that you yourself should not post.
insults
You question my maturity or call me an “e-thug”, just because I questioned your top-3 Warrior list? Wow. Stop being so damn sensitive, man, I’m just saying you have a very strange top 3 list. (Wilt Chamberain=character? hmmm, thats a new one) It seems like it would be the top 3 list of a younger person who never watched run TMC or Rick Barry, loved JRich, thought the novelty of a 7’7” player was interesting, and heard stories about how great Wilt was and heard that he spent a couple seasons as a Warrior. But whatever, you’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but if you put it out there on here, don’t expect to not receive a little criticism.
.
What does this:
what are you like12 years old?
Have to do with this:
You question my maturity or call me an "e-thug", just because I questioned your top-3 Warrior list?
Completely irreverent. It seems you, yourself have to defend yourself after I have criticized you. So listen to your own words which are listed here:
you’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but if you put it out there on here, don’t expect to not receive a little criticism.
Stop being so damn sensitive, man
you have to be able to take a little criticism, if you’re that sensitive don’t post.
I have even corrected your grammatical errors on the last quote.
Only major thing with Wilt’s character as I can see was the claim that he slept with 20,000+ women.
If character isn’t a big factor for you then so be it. Let stats and basketball ability reign supreme for you. I personally admire those with great character. Another Ex-Warrior of great character would also be Derek Fisher, but heck he was a sucky warriors squad and isn’t HoF material so who cares? I do.
Like I said, I do remember the TMC era, mainly because of Manute Bol. But jsut like the Warriors today I do not like many of the players with the exceptions of Tim, Mullin, Pietrus, and Wright (who I actually followed in UNC). The first two are certainly top 10.
Re:
Anyone that replies “lol” isn’t doing much to make their case. On the other hand, this has gone on long enough, good day to you gentlemen.
by passionately objective on May 14, 2008 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions
well
now I feel like I’m arguing with a 12 year old. All I said was that your top 3 warriors list is crazy. Sorry, but it is. If you want to go correcting everyone’s grammar and trying to pick petty fights, go right ahead, but I’m not having any more part of this. (oh and fanfare is one word, make sure youre don’t live in a glass house before you go hurling stones)
Excellent.
Its mature of you to give up. you haven’t given a single worthy and sensual rebuttal to any of my rebuttals or points anyways, its cute arguing with a person who has no corroboration or. i like how you also charge me of starting petty fights when you clearly started his “petty” fight by calling me a 12 year old and calling me sensitive.
I also find it funny how you say:
All I said was that your top 3 warriors list is crazy.
When clearly there was more to it. GG.
hahahaha
man, I was done with you …....but your response was too good to pass up. I havent given a single “sensual” rebuttal? hahahaha. I sure hope I didn’t make a SENSUAL rebuttal. For someone who obviously prides himself so much in his posts, you might want to invest in a dictionary. I think you meant to write something like sensical, which is not actually a word either, but I’m assuming you meant the opposite of nonsensical..which, coincidentally, is exactly the word I would use to describe all of your posts in this debate. But go ahead and respond by misusing the word corroboration again (how am I supposed to provide evidence that you have a strange top 3? you just do).....it makes you look sound so smart and makes me feel all sensual.
Touche
got me there! But you as well have used sensual the wrong way in your last sentence.
Did you have to use the dictionary to find what Corroboration means?The points in which you provided none of that is 6, 8, and 10 posts above this one.
(how am I supposed to provide evidence that you have a strange top 3?
You tell me. Your running your mouth without listing anybody who is supposed to be a top 3 all time favorite.
Hardaway, Mullin, Thurmond, Barry, Richmond, Attles, Wilkes, maybe Chamberlain but he spent the majority of his career elsewhere
my top 3? Hardaway, Mullin, Thurmond
by the way
my usage of sensual was intentional….maybe you need to look up sarcasm. and no I dont need to look up corroboration. If you want to get personal, implying stupidity by pointing out grammatical errors, I’m willing, but I dont think this is really the forum for it.
.
I find it funny how you think it is a personal attack when clearly you started off the barrage by assuming I’m a 12 year old and calling me sensitive. And your really asking if I am really 12 years old? Come on I’ve been hanging around on forums and blogs for years and seen these insults were people ask if your young, usually they ask if your 8, 10, or 12.
Don’t contradict yourself.
your list
still seems like a 12 year olds. I’m sorry, but it does. I dont mean that as an insult, criticism..yes, but not an insult. JRich is a rather weird or random top 3 warrior, and so is Manute. It gave me the initial impression that you hadnt been a warrior fan for very long. but I whatever, sorry it escalated to this, no reason to continue this argument.
You cut school?
so if you’re not in school ur implying your cutting? Jeez what’s next? drug dealing?
by deseanjackson on May 19, 2008 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions
JRich v. Kobe
If JRich was our Kobe, then why dont we have three rings to show for it? I love JRich too, but lets not put him on some crazy pedestal.
lol.
I never said in skill, correct me if I’m wrong. Kobe means alot to the Laker franchise, JR was of that value before Monta’s breakout season. Kobe was committed to the Lakers prior before his BF (BF From White Chicks movie) during the off-season. JR’s commitment to the Warriors was so much more then that of Kobe’s, remember JR was the one who made the letter to Warrior fans for missing the playoffs? Who else has apologized like that? JR also provided the BOOM for Warriors with his dunking ability. Most importantly, JR was the captain and the leader of the Squad before and even when Baron came, just like Kobe.
These reasons are why I personally love J-Rich.
lo
"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald
by WarriorForLife on May 13, 2008 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions
What?!? Who likes her?!? I'll kill em!
Lol.
"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald
by WarriorForLife on May 13, 2008 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions
If you don't want people to like her
Why do you plaster her lovely visage all over this site…? ;-)
![]()
Sighhhhhh…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions
lol
I’m Filipino too, but I must say I liked Brooke White better. Ramielle seems like she acts too much.
who is that
woman in the pic above? forgive my ignorance.
by passionately objective on May 14, 2008 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions
8o lbs.?
Geez, she’s almost as light as Brandan Wright…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 15, 2008 6:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Mannnnn. I missed the last 'l'
That just killed it. :/
"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald
by WarriorForLife on May 13, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions
JRich vs. Kobe
Mediocre defender vs. All NBA defender
Passionate vs. would kill you with the basketball if given the opportunity
Gets to the line 5 times per game vs. gets to the line 10 times per game
65% FT percentage vs. 85% FT percentage
and most importantly:
Captain and leader of crappy team vs. captain and leader of good team
Stop it, yes, there are similarities, except JRich was worse in every category. One could compare Kobe to the SG on my HS basketball team too, but that doesn’t mean he should play for the Warriors.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 13, 2008 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions
JRich is a poor man's Kobe
Not a homeless man’s Kobe, a poor man’s Kobe. You don’t win championships paying a poor man’s anything upwards of 10M/year. You just don’t.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 13, 2008 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions
.
What part of “I never mentioned skill” don’t you get? And it doesn’t matter if a captain is on a crappy team or good team, if the person has a knack for leadership or is blessed with it then he will improve the team.
Thats like comparing Matt Barnes as a captain to Steve Nash or Jason Kidd.
Er
So remind us what you’re arguing again?
You said “JRich was our Kobe.” It’s a puzzling comparison, given that:
1. JRich is demonstrably a much, much better person than Kobe.
2. JRich genuinely seems to care about his team, his teammates and his fans, whereas Kobe is an egomaniacal SOB who only seems to care about himself.
3. JRich is demonstrably a much, much worse player than Kobe.
On the other hand, they’re both shooting guards, and they’re both human beings, so you may be onto something. I don’t quite get how Barnes, Nash, and Kidd factor into the equation, but I’m sure you’ll enlighten us.
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 13, 2008 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions
theyve both
won dunk contests, and that goes a loooong ways to making them similar. Harold Minor and MJ-very similar.
.
JR was our Kobe, Our Superstar.
Both provided leadership, fire/explosiveness, dedication, and intangibles. They both are loved by their organizations, fans and staff alike. They got people into the seats, even when their respective teams were not too good (JR=Pre-Wagon Warriors, KB=Post-Shaq Lakers, thus bringing revenue to their clubs.
And like I said I never said “Skill Wise”
And to counter this point: “You don’t win championships paying a poor man’s anything upwards of 10M/year. You just don’t.”
In addition to that person who receives 10M/year. Give me:
Pau Gasol, Derek Fisher, and Lamar Odom or
Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce or
Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobli or
Shaq or Gary Payton
What do these Championship caliber teams and stars (Kobe, Allen, Parker, Wade) have in common? A SUPPORTING CAST. And when J-Rich finally got a supporting cast. What do you know? He gets traded.
=====================
His comment:
JRich vs. Kobe:Captain and leader of crappy team vs. captain and leader of good team
My Response:
it doesn’t matter if a captain is on a crappy team or good team, if the person has a knack for leadership or is blessed with it then he will improve the team.Thats like comparing Matt Barnes as a captain to Steve Nash or Jason Kidd.
What Boston is basically saying is that “J-Rich’s leadership skills were good only because he was on a crappy team.” Thats a load of baloney to me. If a person is a natural born leader or has great leadership skills then he can lead a team/group regardless of whether that team/group is weak or strong.
Barnes = Not Natural Born Leader/Little Leadership Experience
Nash/Kidd = Natural Born Leaders/Good Leadership Experience
Yup
You’re saying a lot of stuff, to be sure, but I’m still having trouble distilling the point from all the rest of the huffing and puffing. JRich, unlike Kobe, or Duncan, or Shaq, is not a player you can build a championship team around. Now that’s a point you can hang your hat on. The other stuff is just too deep for me, I guess.
I don’t really have an issue with posters talking about their feelings — “favorite players,” “love”, “intangibles”, “leadership skills”, etc. — but that kind of stuff makes for very strange bedfellows with reasoned arguments.
I’m just hoping against hope that this is the last GSoM diary in which we have to go over JRich and his cute face and big muscles and intangibles and the evilness and stupidness of Mullin. All the relevant points have been made, repeatedly. It’s been a year — can we move on?
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 4:23 AM PDT up reply actions
asdf
Because of trading J Rich we’re essentially getting B Wright plus Monta and Andris, with being stuck under his contract it would have been hard to sign just one of our youngins, let alone both of them. In my book, even though it hurt to see him go it was by far the smarter move. It’s a pleasant step in the right direction after all the horrendous contracts we’ve given out over the last decade.
Stephen Jackson catches on the wing and faces up against Vujacic. When Jax looks down and sees Vujacic, his eyes light up. He pulls out his nine, screams "Thug Life" and empties the clip, then drives in for a basically uncontested layup.
chemistry
BD and JRich were the heart and soul of this team, had awesome chemistry, passion and will to win, with JRich on this team this year, Baron and Jax would be fresh and Monta would still have developed would have had a deeper rotation for Nellie. We would still have plenty of tradeable assets and could have watched our Warriors challenging in the playoffs. There is absolutely no guarantee next year that we will make the playoffs with this present team or be even close to a championship team. Should have dumped Al(9M) and not resign Pietrus(3.4M)/Barnes(3M) for cap space. We are now challenged with signing an undersized SG with defensive liabilities for 10-12M ,a thin, offensively challenged center for 8-10M which will handcuff this franchise for the next 5 years. Sorry, but I don’t see Monta, BWright and Biedrins taking us to a championship. I’d still rather build around BD,JRich and Jackson and see them play for 3-4 years together.
by shootda3 on May 12, 2008 9:25 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I'm sorry, but i don't see Jrich carrying us to a championship either.
Perimeter Teams don’t win in the playoffs.
Jrich’s best assets are the jumpshot, jumpshot, and…the jumpshot. And he’s never been one to shoot it at a great clip either, nor is he deadly from the free throw line. The only caveat to this is he played with heart and hustle and was the fan favorite on a crap team.
I don’t blame Jrich for being perimeter oriented. He’s a shooting guard for Pete’s sake. But, his abilities are best utilized with a Big man. The Warriors had none at the time that they could dump the ball into, and get a high percentage shot in the half court set.
The ability to get (and convert) high percentage shots in a half court set gives you a great chance to succeed in game, and through the playoffs, once teams start slowing the pace down. This is where perimeter teams suffer because, using common sense, tells us that farther shots from the rim are tougher to make.
Bad Defensive teams don’t win in the playoffs
This is where Jrich would hurt us. He’s really not that great of a defender. His lateral movement is astoundingly sub-par.
This is also an area of concern for me with the philosophy behind the Warriors defense. They like to get into the passing lanes and swipe at the ball. But half the time the guards let their man blow past them in an attempt to swipe at the ball! Good penetrators get into the lane any time they want for a high percentage shot, or get to the line. This puts our bigmen at a strong disadvantage. I don’t blame AB for committing a lot of fouls, when the blame shouldn’t be on him, but the guards for allowing penetration. Our defensive philosophy is to not play defense straight up and deny penetration, but to gamble at swipes and getting into the passing lanes for the flashy play, when all it takes is fundamental man up defense.
I agree with the OP, the situation and the opportunity presented last summer was pretty rare. It was a savvy move by Mullin and I think the biggest gripe people have is by the shock of the whole thing. I guess never really getting to say goodbye has really given Jrich fanboys something to gripe about.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
no argument...
you point out the weaknesses of jrich’s game. every player in the league has them. now for jrich’s upsides:
- he’s much bigger, taller, stronger than monta making him able to guard larger players in the post, makes him less of a liability in my opinion
- he’s a good scorer (the loss of 20 pts per game will hurt any team)
- he’s a good rebounder, almost 6 per game
- provides rest to the other gaurds by being a consistently productive player
“it was a savvy move by mullin…” actually, putting monta as starting sg without having a productive backup was not. the jrich/monta duo was much better than the monta/buke duo. getting bw as another project player is redundant and unnecassary. we already have pob who has at least proven himself in the d-league. bw’s production in limited minutes is contributed by his shockingly long arms and quickness. in more minutes, he will prove to be a liability as teams will no longer be surprised by him. the salary cap was no issue. with jasikivicous, petrius, barnes, hudson, and bw (would’ve never existed) of the books for ‘08-09 there would be no problem signing monta for another year. the real problem is baron’s contract, who I think is next to go. for the same reason they got rid of richardson. truth be told, the dubs no longer want to pay big $$ for superstars. young players and short term contracts are in mullin’s future plans. this is what that trade was all about. saving money. not for the future well-being of the team. that’s the only real sense that can be made. getting to the playoffs ever again will only be a result of luck, IMHO!
also
by playing big, both Baron ,Jax,and JRich can post up smaller defenders in the half court when often times this past season the offense stalls, JRich proved to be a very good 3pt shooter this year at 41% and hit an NBA best 243 3pt shots, could of used him when Baron,Jax, and Al were shooting 4-20 . Our defense was worse this year as we couldn’t stop anyone down the stretch. The best move for Mullin was to keep our 2007 playoff team intact and eventually trade Monta and Al for a PF before the trade deadline (Gasol, Artest) then make some noise in the playoffs.
JRich, Thanks for the memories
“JRich was the sole reason a lot of us were Warrior fans in those lean years, and he carried us through some tough times. I love the guy to death”
If this is love your friends would do well to not turn their backs on you!
“How can we look at this years team and say it was a failure?”
Maybe cause we’re sitting home watchin the other teams play? while last years crew( with a healthy Jason and a happy Baron) were in the 2nd round.( and your new boy Monta was sitting on the bench hiding under a towel!)
by Skeptic con Urquell on May 12, 2008 9:31 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
there
are just as much of these as there as much as trade ideas so its not really new but oh well i miss him. i still have his poster and jersey on my wall :(
So I don't have a signature well these words would do! Who knew that upgrades can have downgrades too!
by 24k state fan since 87 on May 13, 2008 3:04 AM PDT reply actions
JRich: A Horrible Trade
I used to defend that salary dump before, but now in hindsight it seems like poor judgment (unless Brandan Wright turns into a bonafied star).
Here’s why:
Monta Ellis would have been just as good if JRich stayed. Monta made his MIP campaign coming off the bench last year, remember? He wasn’t THAT much crazier this season from last, nor did he get “more opportunity” with JRich gone. An extra 3 minutes per game and an extra 2 shot attempts? That’s the difference between Monta starting full-time this year and backing up the guard spots last year with JRich starting. I don’t buy that JRich HAD TO GO for Monta to succeed, Monta was already improving at an alarming rate with JRich still here.
Jason Richardson is an ELITE DEFENDER… compared to Monta Ellis. Just on his size, strength and athleticism alone, JRich makes the Warriors defense that much better with him starting at the 2 rather than Monta. Having to have Baron Davis guard other teams’ elite shooting guards burned him out. Monta getting torn up by Chris Duhon and Roger Mason Jr. (and other nobody-guards of the association) was just demoralizing to watch. JRich’s departure put an already defensively-flawed team at an even bigger disadvantage.
Baron Davis would not have had to play 39 minutes per game with JRich here. If JRich stayed, that may have forced Monta to play and learn the backup point more, giving more rest to the Baron. Instead, Nelly was stuck with only two guards that he felt he could trust: Baron and Ellis. So they soaked up most of the minutes, and we all saw how Baron just ran out of steam at the end.
We weren’t a better team this year compared to last, even if our record says so. We need to realize that we spent half the season last year without Jackson and Harrington (and with Dunleavy, Murphy, and Foyle). We were a monster team last year after the trade and made that insane run to finish out the season. This year, we weren’t exactly worse but we weren’t leaps and bounds better either.
We would have had enough salary space under the luxury tax to re-sign Ellis and Biedrins anyway. It doesn’t make sense to me that Mullin traded JRich for cap space a full year before he had to re-sign Ellis and Biedrins. Right now we’re something like $28 mil under the salary cap, we could’ve just as easily kept JRich and pay Ellis and pay Biedrins. And if we still needed cap space to fill out the rest of the roster we could’ve traded JRich away THIS offseason, and probably yielded more value in return due to his near-expiring contract.
Maybe the departure of JRich was inevitable for our longterm success, but I just think the decision was made a year too soon.
by jlagace on May 13, 2008 4:25 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
To quote the guy that Bill Walsh quoted:
It’s better to make a move a year too soon, rather than a year too late.
*or something like that.
by passionately objective on May 13, 2008 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't think we're 28Mill under the cap.
From TK’s blog.
* The Warriors would still have Richardson’s $12.2M salary for next season, $13.3M salary for 2009-2010 and $14.4M salary for 2010-2011 on the books.
- Counting Baron Davis’ $17.8M for next season, the Warriors with Richardson would have about $78.1M tied up with 12 active players on the 2008-2009 payroll.
That’s already WAY over the projected $68M or so luxury tax threshold for next season. That’s very, very bad.
The main point is that we would be a marginal playoff team at best, with a team in luxury tax hell.
The main point for me is that Jrich was good, but not great. Not good enough to be untouchable. His production was filled by Monta. I agree that i think Monta would have developed either way.
I don’t agree that Jrich would’ve gotten Baron’s minutes down. Jrich had no handle and was an average-below average playmaker. Now you’re stuck in hypotheticals. Jrich would’ve slipped over to the 3 while Monta stayed at the 2. Throwing Monta into the fire would not have made him a better point guard.
The core of BD, Jrich, Jack, Al, and Dris’ didn’t spend a whole season together. You make the argument that they were a better team. I don’t agree. This team is largely a perimeter oriented team with no low post presence. These sort of teams hardly make noise in the playoffs. Not to mention the fact that this is a sub-par defensive team.
Trading Jrich a year early was a great move. Getting Brandan, who was a highly touted prospect don’t forget, should be a solid starter at worst. We need to make the transition from a perimeter oriented team, to a well balanced inside-outside team that plays defense. Two things in which Jrich can’t provide.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
Usually I like Kawakami's stuff
But he’s made some wild assumptions about our 2008-2009 team payroll. The facts of the matter are that we only have 6 players under contract including the Baron: Baron, Foyle (buyout), Harrington, Jackson, Wright, and Belinelli. I have no idea how he got that ”$78mil tied up in 12 players” bullcrap. I started reading that article and saw some mentioning about Patrick OBryant and Mickael Pietrus in next years’ plans and immediately zoned out after that; Kawakami has lost all credibility in my eyes if he really believes those two are gonna be on our payroll next season.
I did make a mistake though. That proposed “28mil under the cap” we’d have would only be if Baron opted out. If he stays we’ll be more like 11mil under the cap. If we really wanted to make it work I think we could still have retained JRich and re-signed the kids.
And I must insist our post-trade Warriors of last season were just as good if not better than this year’s team. You argue that we WERE a perimeter oriented team with no low post presence and subpar defensively… We’re STILL a perimeter oriented team with no low post presence and subpar defensively.
And it wouldn’t be “throwing Monta into the fire”, it would be having the luxury of actually being able to play another guy at point and easing him into the role. We couldn’t have Monta playing point this year because then we’d have nobody to play shooting guard; Azubuike isn’t the guy we all hoped he’d be. Kawakami is out of his mind if he thinks JRich would’ve only been playing SF for us. Back when we had Baron/Jrich/Monta the minute distribution was something like this:
PG: Baron 35 / Ellis 13
SG: JRich 27 / Ellis 21
SF: JRich 6
JRich rarely has to play SF for Monta to get his minutes. We could even give Baron more rest and play Ellis more. It doesn’t make sense that retaining JRich would have made us a smaller team.
Then it comes down to being proactive Vs. Resting on your laurels.
I am optimistic about Wright, if he’s the tipping point for you on the Jrich trade.
I think he’ll be a solid player, but who knows whether his ceiling is a perennial All-Star or a Solid role playing starter. I don’t think he’ll be any worse than that.
Trading Jrich (small) for Brandan (big) could transform us from a perimeter team to a solid inside outside threat team. Plus combining his length with Biedrins instantly improves our defense.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
lol..
I guess it all depends on what you call “big” . BW 6’9 205 (with long arms), jrich 6’6 215. yeah, right. BW is going to be a powerhouse at PF
Its the NBA
length is more valuable than bulk. Just ask KG. Sure BW needs to pack on some lbs but at his age theres no reason to think he wont.
sure thing..
and while I’m at it, I’ll ask shawn bradly and manute bol how they did with all their length and no bulk. if bw packs on a few pounds, I don’t doubt he will be a good player. and i hope so. still the fact remains that the dubs had a formula that proved to make it into the playoffs. you shouldn’t mess with a good thing.
Ah yes
Because BWright’s game and skillset is so similar to Bol’s and Bradley’s.
As long as we’re bringing up absurd extremes, why don’t you look up the playing weights of Bill Russell, Kevin Garnett, Dennis Rodman, Larry Bird, or Magic Johnson (I’m too tired of doing it myself). And while you’re at it, look up the playing weights of Stanley Roberts, Yinka Dare, Bryant Big Country Reeves, Eddy Curry…
As for the “messing with a good thing” comment: come on, dude, we’ve been over this before. You’ve said your piece on JRich, now be done with it. Only Skeptic con Urquell should be allowed to keep repeating the same point over and over till he’s blue in the face… ;-P
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions
u again..
and why don’t you stop running around in circles all over this message board looking for someone to trash. you’re wagging your tail and sniffing up the wrong a**
Aw shucks.
I love you too, man. Sniff sniff sniff…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions
you're forgetting...
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/golden_state.htm
according to this site, I can see a bunch of players off the books by next season.
“Jrich would’ve slipped over to the 3 while Monta stayed at the 2. Throwing Monta into the fire would not have made him a better point guard.”
you’re assuming that monta would start. the formula that worked was monta coming off the bench. and the reason it worked is that nelly believes in the point-forward (jackson) that brings up the ball when the starting point is resting.
“We need to make the transition from a perimeter oriented team, to a well balanced inside-outside team that plays defense. Two things in which Jrich can’t provide.”
jrich was a penetrater with a 3-ponit threat. that’s nelly’s definition of inside-outside. we all know, nelly doesn’t post his big men. and doesn’t play a traditional style defense either.
Monta wouldn't have been maximized as a bench player.
You don’t build a team around swingmen and guards. How can we succeed when our three main guys (Jack, BD, and Jrich) have been efficient when they shoot it the low 40FG%.
Jrich Was a slasher but then fell in love with the three ball. He never got to the line as much as he should have. You absolutely cannot argue that point.
We need to play inside out meaning we need to find ways to score efficiently close to the basket. This is best utilized through having a low post threat. You can also go inside-out by penetration to the hole or through drive and kicks.
When the Warriors sucked, it’s when we became too perimeter happy and jacked up the first open three someone could find. That leads to stagnation and less motion. It also alienated your teammates. It doesn’t breed good, winning basketball as evidenced by the Warriors missing the playoffs and Denver never really showing up.
Meanwhile, teams that do play an organized, functional and efficient offense, have gone far in the playoffs (SAS, NOK, Utah, LAK, Det, and Bos).
A team with Monta, BD, Jack, and Jrich all are best utliized on the perimeter. They all have faults in their games, yes. But i’d still rather live with Monta getting most of the minutes at the 2 guard spot and his spiffy 53FG% as opposed to Jrich’s 44FG%. I can go deeper, Ellis trumps Jrich in True Shooting % (57% to 55%), Free throws attempted per field goals attempted (.34 to .23) a higher FT% (76.7% to 75%) and a higher PER rating of 18.9 to 18.4. So to surmise that there is indeed a valid argument that Monta was a slight improvement at the 2 guard. The point is that Monta was/is too talented to have him come off the bench. He’s not Barbosa.
And geez, talk about sour grapes over this trade for a year. I know you’re just trying to prove a point by dogging Brandan Wright as a bust already. You and I both know we can’t call him a bust any more than we can call him a star. I feel confident with what i’ve read about him pre 07’ draft and by watching him with my own two eyes that he’ll be a solid-if not key starter for the warriors in the next couple of years. Again this is just my own opinion. But you’re going to disagree nonetheless, but in the end, when you’re in your bed and fast asleep, just remember who won and which player got sent out of Oakland.
Nah-Nah-Nah-Nah-Nah.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"Monta wouldn't have been maximized as a bench player."
and why is that?
Playing time is playing time. 35 minutes on the floor is 35 minutes on the floor. He may even have more freedom in the offense coming off the bench. He may even have done better going against more 2nd-string defenders. I see no advantage of him starting at 2guard and playing 35 minutes as opposed to him coming off the bench and backing up PG and SG for 35 minutes.
And we’re forgetting that JRich did have a very respectable post game. The beauty of Nellieball last season was that we punished teams with small guards by posting up Baron and JRich all day.
You can throw the JRich vs Ellis offensive efficiency statistics around all you want, but it’s really not about that. There’s no reason why Ellis couldn’t have done that with JRich still on the team. Ellis wouldn’t have lost his playing time or his opportunity to “grow”; Azubuike and Pietrus and Barnes would have played less and that’s something I wouldn’t have been sad about.
+1
Nothing wrong with being an instant offense 6th man when you’re basically too small to guard most 2-guard starters anyway. Plus a strong 3 guard rotation would have been a lot better than a small 2guard, a star 1guard and __ off the bench.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
good post
but comparing stats like 55% vs. 57% and 76.7% vs. 75% and 18.9 to 18.4 dont drop my jaw. And yes we can’t call BWright a bust any more than we can call him a star.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
you're right...
I do disagree
“The point is that Monta was/is too talented to have him come off the bench. ”
just ask the spurs how value their 6th man awarding winning bench player is to them. you have no idea!
Don
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
Don't compare the Warriors to the Spurs.
The Spurs are a far better organization.
Yes Manu is the third best player on the Spurs and comes off the bench. But their team success is largely do to the man in the middle. Timmy anchors their defense and offense and creates so many wide open shots for their shooters.
This is what the Warriors should model themselves after.
You can’t tell me the Spurs would be a playoff team with Jrich in SA and Duncan somewhere else.
This horse has been beaten to a cruel death. We had a great year, but unfortunately disappointing. It is arguable and impossible to determine which team was better, post All star break 07’ team as compared to the 07-08’ team. Sure you can use your eyes or listen to Nellie, but the fact is we won more games and still missed the playoffs. So it will always be a matter of debate with neither sides coming to a conclusion.
The “Big Picture” Warriors fans Vs. the “Reminiscent” Warrior fans will argue on for years.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
the problem is...
you, sleepy, sam, and the rest of the minority are just missing the point. you keep on trying to find the stats and comparisons to back up what turned out to be a bad trade, even with hind-sight, 20/20 vision of a season without jrich. it could’ve been any of the main guys on the dubs, baron, jackson, harrington, monta, beads, that got traded and we would still be pissed. and it’s because we finally make it to the playoffs and they break up the team. of course they had their reasons for doing it, just like richmond for owens, jamison was overpaid (and now you hope for a guy like him in bw), agent zero was another.
you also disregard the intangibles like crowd participation and chemistry. there’s no stats for that. and you’re only argument and leg to stand on is that we won more games this season. everyone in the west won more games this season because the east were such push-overs. the were even at best, and killed themselves to do it. and in the end, when it counted most, they were burnt out.
we keep beating the dead horse cuz the dead horse has a freakin thick head!
Yup
If you actually think the only argument that has been put forward in favor of the JRich trade is that we won more games this year than last, you clearly haven’t been reading very well. Somehow that wouldn’t surprise me.
You keep clinging to your mythical “majority”, regurgitating your tired cliches, and hurling your ad hominems. If you allowed yourself to look at both sides of the issue — and actually listened to knowledgeable, passionate hoops observers like Kawakami, JAE, Kenntoe, Sam Smith, et al. — you’d likely see that at the very least the decision to trade JRich was neither (a) dumb, nor (b) malicious.
I’ve granted repeatedly that there were some pretty good, sound arguments for keeping JRich. Why can’t you grant the same respect to the “minority” who disagree with you?
Help, we’re being oppressed!!!
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Minority
Well Sleepy, we may be in the minority but it turns out that I’m a “Superdelegate” on GSoM. We might be able to use some back room politics to win the J-Rich debate after all.
For the record I almost broke out OZ’s salary spreadsheet as a visual aid, but then I came back to my senses. There is no healing in the mind for a wounded heart.
"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy
OlympicObama!
Good to hear from you. Where have you been? I could have used you (and OZ) in the latest outbreak of this never-ending discussion.
I’m not sure which I’d like to see end sooner, this tired debate or HRC…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 15, 2008 6:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I've been around
As you’d put it “I’m taking a break from this place”. It’s probably the emotional letdown of missing the playoffs mixed with the new look and function of the site that have kind of cooled me off lately. I plan on returning refreshed and ready to beat this dead horse again soon.
I think that it is no coincidence that all the guys who were against trading J-Rich are showing up right now as the sting of missing the postseason is still lingering, so I’m trying not to let any of the arguments here get under my skin.
As for HRC, as soon as she “lands the plane” me, you and all the other elitists can throw a party.
"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy
by olympicmike on May 15, 2008 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions
you're too funny
i already gave in to some of the facts that there were benefits from the trade. I was replying to norcal when he said…
“they had to win 16 out of 21 and 9 out of 10 and made the playoffs on the last day of the season. And that was a grand total of 42 wins. We had 48 this year.”
it’s the only fact you have that shows that the dubs are an improvement from the trade. everything else you say are in hopes that bw turns out to be a good player, and our current roster is able to improve on its own. and hopefully signing a good rook who can contribute right away. all optimistic stuff. and if optimism is what you’re selling, I’ll take 2. cuz if they stay on the course they are on right now, we’re in for another loooong playoff drought. thanks to a trade that seemed like a good idea at the time.
OK then...
Say we never traded Jrich and went with a lineup of:
BD, Monta, Jrich, Jack, and Dris’/Al
W/ Barnes, MP, Cro, Belli, Azu, and CJ off the bench.
You say this is a stronger team than our 07-08’ team. Fair enough, that’s your opinion.
Now ask yourself if this team would’ve beaten the Lakers in a 7 game series. Would it have beaten Utah in a 7 game series?
My opinion is that while our team would’ve competed better than Denver did, We still wouldn’t have beaten the better teams in the postseason.
What’s the point of assembling an NBA team? To make the playoffs or to win the championship (or at least a perennial contender)?
In my mind, the fact of the matter is, that the Warriors weren’t built to win in the playoffs to begin with…regardless of the acquisition of Jack and Harrington. The failure to actually land a top bigman is what sent Jrich out of town. If we had a bigman, it would’ve maximized all of our perimeter player’s talents. So blame our unluckiness. Blame St. Jean for drafting Dunleavy over Amare.
Now.
you keep on trying to find the stats and comparisons to back up what turned out to be a bad trade
You nor I can say this was a bad or good trade…yet. Again look big picture.
it could’ve been any of the main guys on the dubs, baron, jackson, harrington, monta, beads, that got traded and we would still be pissed. and it’s because we finally make it to the playoffs and they break up the team.
Last time i checked Jrich was only one person. I’d hardly count this as “breaking up the team”.
you also disregard the intangibles like crowd participation and chemistry. there’s no stats for that.
Crowd still was pretty good this year. Still amongst the best. I guess that’s because they’re fans of the team, not fans of the individual. I think maybe you’re referring to the highligh reel dunks that got the crowd on their feet. I felt the chemistry was still pretty good this year. But i believe in chemistry being most important with guys like BD, Monta and Jack. The playmakers on the team that need to know where their guys are at, how and when they’re going to cut, and where their guys’ sweet spots are. I think it’s still an issue, but to a lesser degree with finishers in the league.
you’re only argument and leg to stand on is that we won more games this season. everyone in the west won more games this season because the east were such push-overs. the were even at best, and killed themselves to do it. and in the end, when it counted most, they were burnt out.
I’ve repeatedly said that we need to make the transition from perimeter team to an effective inside outside team. Brandan may or may not provide that inside presence. I’m optimistic though. But by trading Jrich, it gives us a lot more flexibility to possibly acquire one down the line. Being able to resign AB and Monta without getting penalized is just icing on the cake.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
fine...
why don’t you ask any team in the playoffs, or even the whole league for that matter how well they stack up against the lakers? do you think we are any closer to being as good as the lakers or jazz by getting $$ and bw? you go ahead and keep experimenting with different players from the draft, from trades, whatever. bottom line is that they finally found something that worked and didn’t stick with it long enough to see it through their full potential. that’s like if clevland knocks boston out, and the celtics trade ray allen in the off-season.
by oldskool on May 15, 2008 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wow...
Now you’re comparing the Warriors to the Celtics…Really? First San Antonio, now Boston.
You must’ve really, REALLY held the Warriors to such high esteem.
The Warriors were never at the quality that either team is/was at.
Look around the league and how effective perimeter teams have been. New Jersey hasn’t done anything, Denver, Seattle (except that one year they won 50+ games), Atlanta, hell, a lot of other teams that don’t have a bigman to build around have had little success in the playoffs.
Well, fine go ahead and maintain that the post 07-08’ team was a GREAT team and contenders in a deep west.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
while you sleep, remember who won
that’s a good one, lol
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
As maligned as Ellis’s defense was by many, there’s ridiculously little evidence that his presence made the team worse in this category this year. This may be an issue with who his backups were and that they weren’t any better, but it doesn’t suggest that he’s such a liability as to be able to be exploited to the point of failure for the Warriors. It’s also peculiar that as a rookie, I remember that he was praised for getting after guys on defense. It may be who he was charged with defending, it may be emphasis that Nelson places on it (e.g. he’s allowed to conserve energy for the other end of the court) but I suspect that his ability to defend isn’t as lousy as it’s made out to be. I also suspect that some of it is a variation of “Nichol’s Law”. Nichol’s Law states that the defensive reputation of a catcher is inversely proportional to his offensive abilities. I’ve noticed that many a player’s defensive reputation (as assessed by sports writers, bloggers and BBS posters) declines when his scoring goes up. It’s not universal, but I suspect it factors into things.
We could NOT simply rely on trading Richardson now had we kept him, because trading partners who would allow us to dump salary are few and far between. The Warriors traded Richardson when they did because his value was there to be traded. If Mullin had waited a year, there’s no guarantee that a team under the cap would have taken his salary, and it required a team under the cap to create room. If we’d kept him this year, we couldn’t trade him for an upcoming expiring deal and have his tax-room for another year when that contract expires. There was a deal on the table last year and ensured that we’d not be paying that salary coming up next year while also netting a young player with value at a position of need.
Unjudgable
I didn’t think the Warriors needed to trade J-Rich, although I do understand why they ultimately did so. My only objection, as written here, is that the squad should have had a chance to see what they could have done together.
Frankly, should Richardson have stayed on this team, the Warriors could have traded Pietrus for something. MP would not have been needed. They could have gotten a better year out of Al Harrington, who would have had no pressure on him whatsoever (although, I do admit, that as much as I like Harrington, he’s got to start producing consistently). They could have run the uber-scary lineup of Baron, Monta, J-Rich, Jack, and Biedrins in crunchtime. That’s a true Nellie lineup – an anchor in the middle with four guys that space the hell out of the floor and can get to the basket at will.
In any case, the ultimate judgement on the trade can only happen after the Warriors see what they got in Brandan Wright. Almost everyone said that Wright was the next coming of Chris Bosh, left-handed and long-necked and everything. If the Warriors got Bosh for Richardson, no one would complain.
But as of right now, they didn’t get Bosh. As of right now, they got Wright.
As of right now, this trade isn’t looking too good because Wright didn’t instantly come in and produce. We’ll just have to wait and see if that changes – he’s got two years to get it in gear in my book.
by pree on May 13, 2008 9:50 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree...
I’m with you on that. so, far it doesn’t look like saving money for the future has made any impact on improving the team. improvement isn’t the number of total games you win in a season, more importantly it’s about beating the teams you need to beat to get into the playoffs. Mullin must have saw the warriors making the playoffs the previous season as them hitting their peak and now they feel like they need to rebuild to get farther in a few years. The argument is that a lot of fans would’ve liked to see this team through a full season together. I still stand behind my feeling that it was a bad trade. but the verdict is still out, and if they make the playoffs within the next 2 years, I’ll gladly eat my words.
DAMN YOU FOYLE!
Had we not given Foyle that huge contract, we probably could have found some way to keep J-Rich.
by Five Ten Entertainment on May 13, 2008 12:29 PM PDT reply actions
Foyle
and the part that hurts the most is seeing the Lakers trade away Kwame Brown’s bloated and expiring contract and got Pau Gasol in return. Had we just held on to Foyle we could still have had the chance to do something similar. Now we’re just paying the man $6mil a year to NOT be here, a whopping ~$3mil/year in savings and an extra roster spot (which we had plenty of anyway with the uselessness of the likes of Hudson, Webber, MBenga, Belinelli, POB, Perovic, and other non-contributors). The Adonal Foyle buyout was a horrible mistake to cover up an even worse mistake.
j-rich trade
Here’s a twist on J-rich deal. How about instead of having Charlotte take Wright with the 8th pick, taking Noah (picked 9th by Chicago). Would have improved defense and rebounding. He seems like a great fit for Ws with fiery personality and energy + Nellie may have played him more as he was more experienced (23 yrs old + 2 NCAA titles). I hope I’m wrong and Wright turns out great but I think Noah might have been the better choice (Thornton, J. Wright and Thaddeus Young also look like great potential players that Mullin passed on for Brandan)
It's been suggested here a few times
By dear departed OptionZero, among other GSoMers.
My take is that it would have improved us more in the immediate — possibly even enough to leapfrog Denver into the #8 spot — but that Wright’s upside is a lot higher. He’s just a much smoother, much more explosive athlete. Guys with Wright’s combo of length, hops, speed, and coordination don’t come around very often. Noah’s basically Andy Varejão part deux; Wright has a chance to be a weird hybrid of Jamison and Bosh, possibly better than either. In fact, in his very limited minutes last year, Wright outperformed Noah by PER, 17.3 to 15.5.
So far, I’m pretty OK with the pick. The jury’s still out, obviously.
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 13, 2008 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Are you talking about upside potential?
Wright is young, long, and has lots of upside potential. Noah, on the other hand is old, seasoned, and does not have upside potential.
Upside potential.
I like Wright better too.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 14, 2008 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I hear ya
I just signed up but it makes sense that you guys probably chopped up last year’s draft pretty well by now. I agree with you on Wright’s potential. He made some pretty amazing plays when he got a chance. (is PER rebounds/48 minutes?) It was just borderline bizarre how Nelson would ignore him when it seemed like he could obviously help. Watching less talented rook Landry making big plays for the Rockets in the playoffs made me wonder where Warriors would be if Nelson tried to get Wright in rotation a little more. (I realize he’s more a long term project) I also agree that Noah probably never will be great but I think he could be a more rounded player than Varajao (he’s already a pretty good passer) Seems like Mullin uses lottery picks taking chances on raw young big men with potential (Biedrins, Diagu, O’Bryant, Wright) which is pretty good strategy if you can fill yr other positions through trades and low picks with Davis, Ellis, Jackson, Azabuke etc. Sooner or later hopefully he hits the lottery jackpot (still could be Wright)
Diogu was far from a raw bigman.
He just had limited upside.
I remember OZ’s debate about Noah.
I just think it seemed a bit redundant adding him to a team that already has Biedrins. You can’t put two guys out there who don’t look to score or stretch out the defense.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
PER
PER strives to measure a player’s per-minute performance, while adjusting for pace. A league-average PER is always 15.00, which permits comparisons of player performance across seasons.PER takes into account positive accomplishments, such as field goals, free throws, 3-pointers, assists, rebounds, blocks and steals, and negative ones, such as missed shots, turnovers and personal fouls. The formula adds positive stats and subtracts negative ones through a statistical point value system. The rating for each player is then adjusted to a per-minute basis so that, for example, substitutes can be compared with starters in playing time debates. It is also adjusted for the team’s pace. In the end, one number sums up the players’ statistical accomplishments for that season.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_Efficiency_Rating
(If you’re interested in the exact formula, or in some of the problems with it, click the link).
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 15, 2008 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Good call
on Diogu- biggest stretch of my theory. Also Noah does kind of seem like he repeats Biedrins. Ok you guys almost talked me out of Noah. My last salvo is that the big men who last and excel in league are the ones that play hard and improve their game as opposed to those who float by on size and talent. (seems like Noah fits former category); Wright sometimes seems kind of aloof. But man, I really hope he’s a Jamison-Bosh hybrid.
championship teams
stay together with veterans who lead, Detroit and San Antonio have had the same starting line for the past 3-4 years and have consistently been contenders. They also play defense and at least have 2-3 solid bench players in their rotation. Detroit has had time through the draft to continue to develop young players Maxiel, Stuckey who are waiting their turn. Billups, Hamilton, Wallace, Prince have all taken turns being all-stars, they didn’t resign Ben Wallace and were smart enough to replace him and not give him a cap cripling contract. We have had terrible drafts, POB, Lasme, Taft, Perovic, Foyle, Diogu, Dunleavy, Murphy and have sent several all-star type players leave our team in their prime, Arenas, Jamison, Richardson because of poor decision making in handling our cap. Nellie even said that our 2007 playoff team with JRich was better than our 48 win 2008 team. Unless Mullin gets lucky in the draft and picks a gem or finds decent bench players for Nellie, we’ll be looking at 9-10th seed in the west. Monta and Biedrins have too many flaws to be earning a contract more than 8M/yr and wouldn’t even start on a deep Detroit Piston team. This is a very important summer for Mullin as he needs to field a team that will win and be stronger than our 2007 team. Both Baron, Jax are our veteran leaders and need to stay with this team.
You're correct about one thing
To keep a good team you need to get a good team and keep them together. We haven’t been able to do that because of all the huge crappy contracts Mullin handed out in the early years. He’s getting rid of them and then doing his job. Part of getting rid of that was getting rid of JRich’s contract for more than 50 cents on the dollar.
He’s drafted well, you’re wrong. He only missed on PoB and Ike, and he found two gems in Arenas and Monta. He doesn’t have to “get lucky”.
Monta and Beans would get plenty of minutes with Detroit. Beans would definitely get the starting nod over McDyess in some circumstances and I’d rather play Monta over Rip, but maybe you feel differently.
Find me two other players that are 23 or under who don’t have flaws. Look up some salaries of players around the league before you make statements like Monta/Beans don’t deserve 8M/year. Yes they do, their current production justifies it, and they’re so young that their future production has a very good chance of improving drastically.
To field a team that will win and be stronger than our 2007 team he needs to:
A) Keep Baron happy
B) Resign Monta/Beans to reasonable contracts
C) Draft a player
D) Not make drastic changes
E) Ask Nellie to please please please put just a little emphasis on defense
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 14, 2008 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions
These are the facts as I see them:
1. JRich was/is overpaid
a. Having JRich on the payroll for NEXT YEAR would mean not being able to resign Monta & Beans without going into lux tax (which Cohan wouldn’t likely have done).
b. JRich was not sold for 50 cents on the dollar. We may or may not have got better value in return, but it wasn’t horrible.
c. Waiting to trade JRich in this coming offseason or next would have drastically reduced his trade value, and it would have been very hard to find a trade partner who
could take his contract without giving us salary in return.
2. Having JRich on the team LAST YEAR would DEFINITELY have been better than having BWright on the team LAST YEAR
3. Having JRich on the team LAST YEAR would NOT have meant 2nd round in the playoffs.
I don’t think anybody will dispute these assertions (I call them facts). If you want to debate one of my facts, debate that fact. If you want to debate the implications of one of the above statements, by all means do so. But please, please, please don’t change the subject in the middle of the debate.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 14, 2008 10:44 AM PDT reply actions
+1
seems like that ought to put an end to the whole thing, we can all agree on those. The difference is some think another playoff run wouldve been worth it, others of us disagree. Lets just agree to disagree and put the JRich issue to bed.
-1
nah, debates are fun. let’s keep going. :P
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
hasnt this one run its course
I dont know maybe it hasnt, but I feel like I’m reading the same arguments over and over.
actually
I think the debate will go on until BWright does or doesn’t pan out, and until JRich markedly declines or improves. Also, the 10mil exception still has to materialize into a player that can be critiqued, and Monta and Biedrins still have to resolve their contracts and then live up to them.
This is the kind of dialogue that comes as a “bonus” with trading a player like Jrich for something whose benefits are promised but not yet delivered.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
Actually
What happens from here on out to JRich or BWright Future isn’t really relevant to the debate.
I mean, I don’t doubt that the debate will rage on — probably longer than “tastes great” v. “less filling.” You can’t overestimate the degree to which some fans here loved JRich, and the amount of handwringing that they will do on his behalf, spilt milk be damned.
At the same time, when judging a trade, one should always do one’s best to avoid 20:20 hindsight and judge solely on the information available at the time of the trade. Based on that criteria, I happen to think it was a very shrewd move. Crazy Sam Smith agrees with me: he was shrieking at the time about what a bonehead move it was for Charlotte. Other hoops observers (Bill Simmons, e.g.) thought it was a bad move for the Ws.
Either way, sam23 is correct that all the arguments pro and con have been stated, over and over. The last few diaries on the subject really have been nothing more than rehashing. Can’t we talk about something else … like Ramielle? ;-)
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
trades
The success or failure of a trade isn’t solely judged at a snapshot in time when the trade is made. A trade’s success or failure is traditionally revisited over and over and over again as the careers of all the players involved evolve. That’s how it is in the sports world. 20:20 hindsight is part of that game and a tool for debate.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
I'm not talking about the success or failure of the trade
I’m talking about the wisdom or lack thereof of the decision to make the trade.
In that regard, 20:20 hindsight really isn’t applicable. It may be “how it is” in the sports world, among crazed fans, but it really isn’t fair to the decision makers (GMs, coaches, players, whoever). These guys are forced to make tough decisions all the time. Sometimes they decide wisely, sometimes not. But whether the decision was wise at the time and whether it worked out for the best are often two totally different questions.
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions
wisdom or lack thereof of the decision to make the trade...
...but not the trade itself? OK. I would argue that every GM believes that he’s making a good trade when he’s making it. But after that the scrutiny ensues. That’s what this debate is isn’t it? We’re scrutinizing their decisioins. Sure they make tough decisions that seem good to them at the time, but how the players in that trade fare after the trade is exactly what it’s all about. And, no i’m not ignoring the money aspects and the cap flexibility yada yada. Bottom line is whatever players you end up with directly or indirectly and their success after the trade is exactly the whole picture.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
Let's try this again.
I’m not talking about whether or not a GM “believes he’s making a good trade when he’s making it.” I’m talking about whether it was a wise decision at the time he made it.
Do you actually not comprehend the difference between a wise decision and a decision that happens to turn out well, or are you just being obtuse?
Hypothetically, try this one: Mullin trades Harrington, POB, and a carload of Humboldt’s finest for LeBron James. The next day LeBron blows out his knee playing hopscotch and his career is over. Meanwhile, Harrington and POB go to a self-help guru and transform themselves into the second-coming of Elgin Baylor and Wilt Chamberlain, respectively.
Meanwhile, due to crop failure, the price of weed rises 10,000% overnight.
Now here comes ssmokinjoe, arguing that Mullin made a stupid trade. Well, good for you. If only Mullin and the rest of us mortals had your omniscience.
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
smoke some of that yourself, you need to calm down
Hey of course i understand that you love the “wisdom” of the trade and would love to make love to Nelson and Mullin over and over again for it. But let’s try this again… anytime there’s a trade, the perceived success of it hinges on the successes of the players involved and the success that they bring their teams. The fact that a ton of people here else here are saying tha BWright is our PF for years to come requires some speculation on their part too. So attack them equally please.
Some people liked the Kidd trade some didn’t. When Kidd didn’t pan out the trade was branded a failure. Some thought the Shaq trade was good. When the Suns got bounced in the first round, a lot dubbed that a failure. You know why? Because the succes of the trade was predicated on the success that the players brought to their teams. That’s all i’m saying.
I understand you liked the idea of the trade for it’s face value and timing. I understand. I understand. I understand. Stop goining in circles and listen to what others are saying instead of thinking you have to say your piece over and over again because you dont . I hear you. Hear me. Please.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
I actually agree with the both of you.
:)
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
I'm calm, dude
You, on the other hand, sound a little hysterical.
Why don’t you tell me exactly where I misrepresented your argument instead of complaining that I’m not listening to you?
I hear you. I’m listening to you. I don’t agree with you.
You’re using the way angry, passionate fans debate trades as a model of how they should debate trades. I’m saying we should strive for a higher level of fairness.
With Shaq, Kidd, or JRich, I’m drawing a clear distinction between the success of trade and the wisdom of the trade. I happened to think the Shaq and Kidd’s trades were godawful, unwise trades at the time of the deals, and that the JRich trade was a pretty smart one. Nothing that happens from the point of the trades on will change that assessment.
I understand you like to judge trades with a bit of 20:20 hindsight. I understand. I understand. I understand. Stop goining in circles and listen to what others are saying instead of thinking you have to say your piece over and over again because you don’t. I hear you. Hear me. Please.
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions
you're in rare form tonight sleepy
Please go back and read everything i’ve said in this thread. I think you’ve got me confused with someone else. For one thing the utter tasteless mocking style of your replys is amazing tonight. I should probably be flattered that you were so impressed by my post that you had to plagerize part of it to try to irk me.
All i was saying was that trades are scrutinized long after they happen. Not just by me, so deal with that and dont use me as a focal point for your displeasure with that practice. Maybe not everyone can be such a PhD at trade analysis such as yourself. If you wanna be recognized as the gold-standard of trade analysis, then that’s awesome for you. I never criticized the trade anywhere in this thread. If you find where i did please alert me.
You’ve called me a crazed fan, obtuse, and hysterical now. Get of your high horse and stop being so arrogant.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
Well
I plagiarized that bit of your post not so much because I wanted to irk you as because it was so appropriate. But you’re right, I should have used the quote thingie rather than just parroting you. Let’s try this correct way.
you’re in rare form tonight sleepy
Thanks. I’m posting in between burning the midnight oil at the office on a big presentation for tomorrow. That may have given my posts a an extra kick.
Please go back and read everything i’ve said in this thread.I have. I think.
I think you’ve got me confused with someone else.
I don’t think so. Since I tend to respond to specific posts, rather than specific posters, it’d be unlikely. But if there’s a post wherein I misquoted or misinterpreted you, let me know.
All i was saying was that trades are scrutinized long after they happen
That’s not all you were saying, but if that’s what you’re saying now, I totally agree with you.
Not just by me, so deal with that and dont use me as a focal point for your displeasure with that practice.
If it felt like I was using you as a”focal point” I’m sorry: I didn’t intend it that way. I think 20:20 hindsight is a (mostly) lame practice. And it’s not really my style to just “deal with” stuff I think is lame. I prefer to rant and rave like a loony. ;-O
Maybe not everyone can be such a PhD at trade analysis such as yourself. If you wanna be recognized as the gold-standard of trade analysis, then that’s awesome for you.
Again, I’m not talking about PhDs and gold standards. I’m talking about basic fairness and logic.
I never criticized the trade anywhere in this thread. If you find where i did please alert me.
And I never said you criticized the trade. At least I don’t think I did. AFAIK, all I did was take a issue with your statement that we need to see how BW and JR perform going forward before we can judge the trade. I don’t think that’s a good or fair way to judge a trade. How it got from there to you slinging crap at me, I don’t know. I’m sure my occasionally snotty/arrogant tone had something to do with it, but I don’t think you’re blameless.
You’ve called me a crazed fan, obtuse, and hysterical now.
Er, not quite. I said you “sound a littlle hysterical.” I never called you a crazed fan. I asked if you were “being obtuse.” Obviously I don’t actually think you are obtuse. From what I’ve read of your posts, you’re a pretty sharp guy. I just didn’t think you have acknowledged the line I had drawn between the wisdom of a trade (at the time) and the success of a trade (in retrospect). Later you seemed to get it.
Get of your high horse and stop being so arrogant.
I’ll try, if you try not to take my ranting about stuff I feel strongly about so personally. Deal?
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 14, 2008 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm confused at this point.
But i remember at the time of the trade, there were rumors that the warriors were still in the running for KG.
Talks about Minnesota not wanting Jrich’s contract were starting to appear.
So maybe Mullin goes out and trades Jrich for the TPE and the 8th selection in order to flip it to Minnesota for KG and another player with the TPE.
SO…At the point the Warriors made the trade, Mullin could’ve known that he was going to flip the TPE and pick. So at the moment KG was dealt to Boston, the trade of Jrich that was a step to get KG, was all for naught…er…a step forward instead of five steps forward. SO… does that make the Jrich trade go from a wise decision to a not so wise decision that worked out in the end?
I’m confusing myself.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
Your reply...
...with the “obtuse” comment and that crap “Lebron” scenario was an insult to my intelligence. Sometimes your posts have a certain tone to them that i don’t think you’re completely oblivious to. You should identify who’s trying to have a discussion with you and who’s trying to clown you and treat them accordingly or else the discussion tends to go downhill from there. I’ll try not to take things personally, but if the discussion enters a certain “space”, my tone is gonna follow suit.
Aside from all that… i still stand by my posts for now. I’ll admit that i see the logic behind the trade-or the “wisdom”- but it’s necessity still doesn’t ring true to me. The trade will be judged for a long time by a lot of people through BWright’s and Jrich’s performances from here on out (among other things.. i.e. trade exception, etc. )whether we like it or not. You can keep arguing your side for that duration and i’ll respect that.
If BWright becomes Bosh-zilla, the trade will be praised as genius. And i know that that’s irrelavant to your point, because the logic of the trade was already a win in and of itself. But i’m trusting that you understand that that will be the perception.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
Yes
I understand that that will be the perception. And I even allow that it will add a bit of force, or gravity, to my personal feeling that it was a good trade. And clearly, I’m praying it happens
1. Because a young, long active 4 who runs the floor, finishes, crashes the boards, and defends the rim like a madman is something we could kinda use.
2. Because, OK yeah, I would quite enjoy saying “I told ya so” to the JRich fanboys.
Unfortunately, Wright will likely turn out somewhere in the vast grey area between “Boshzilla” and bust, and the debate will rage on…
Point taken on the stuff about my tone. I’m usually not oblivious to it — a lot of the time I am actually trying to be a smartass. But you’re right that I should always distinguish between the thoughtful posts and the clownage.
On the “crap” Lebron example: I actually thought that was a pretty good, fair illustration of what I was talking about (excluding the little embellishment about your hypothetical reaction to it). Can I assume that in that situation you would agree that it was a great trade, regardless of how horribly it turned out?
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 15, 2008 4:06 AM PDT up reply actions
you're reaching...
... because in your example we were getting Lebron!
I’ll try to give you an honest answer here:
The initial reaction to the trade would have been “Lebron for scrub-a-dubs?! Holy F-n Sh*t!!!”
But if Lebron would have gone down to injury like you said then my reaction would be:
“That’s F’d. The Warriors never catch a break. Great trade. Bad luck.”
Final reaction:
“I’m selling my stash and buying the Warriors myself!!!”
The biggest difference with your scenario in which we get Lebron and the the actual Bwright/Jrich trade is that there is no immediate gratification for Warrior fans. We got a project, a TE, and future cap space. Getting Lebron for peanuts would give anyone immediate goosebumps. Lebron!!!! WOOHOO!!!
Getting BW for JR? BW? Um ok. Yay? Oh, a TE too? That’s pretty great. Cap space? We could sure use that. For JR? Wow, did we get a good deal? Oh we did? Thanks for explaining that to me. How do the Giants look this season?
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
I think a poker analogy works best here
If you were sitting at a poker table with two aces, and a flop of A92 with no paired suits, and your opponent goes all in, what’s the smart move?
You obviously have the best possible hand at the moment, straight possibilities are minimal and flush possibilities are out. There is no hand that has more than a 20% chance to beat you, so your best bet is to call.
If you lose after that is chance, not a reflection on your decision making abilities.
To bring it back to the trade, when you make a trade, you have to evaluate the decision that is being made. It looks like you understand the concept when you say:
"That’s F’d. The Warriors never catch a break. Great trade. Bad luck."
But you don’t seem to see how this relates back to the JRich trade.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 16, 2008 7:07 AM PDT up reply actions
i dont play much poker
But who’s that Ace on the flop? In texas hold em it’s value is face up. So an Ace is an Ace is an Ace. But what if they only gave you a peek at that card? It might just be the tip of a 4?
In straight poker if i had 3 Aces and two 9’s, do i throw one of my Aces out and hope the next card is a 9?? Even if someone guaranteed me 80% odds that it is?
Sorry if that’s a bad analogy. I said i don’t play much poker.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
hmm
“Having JRich on the payroll for NEXT YEAR would mean not being able to resign Monta & Beans without going into lux tax (which Cohan wouldn’t likely have done).”
Untrue. Walk on over to hoopshype.com, look at our tiny payroll for the upcoming season, and tell me we wouldn’t have been able to still afford JRich and the kids without going into the luxury tax.
“Waiting to trade JRich in this coming offseason or next would have drastically reduced his trade value, and it would have been very hard to find a trade partner who
could take his contract without giving us salary in return.”
How do you come to this conclusion? If anything, we traded JRich when his trade value was at its absolute lowest. He was coming off an injury-plagued year and he had his worst statistical season dating all the way back to 2002-2003, his sophomore year. Also, traditionally, players become more attractive in trade scenarios as they near the end of their contract. JRich would have been an even more enticing commodity this offseason due to less years remaining on his expensive contract.
We wouldnt be able to afford JRich and Monta and Beans without going into lux tax
the 3 of them would be about 30 million next year. Maybe we could afford them all…..with a 5 man roster.
Monta and Biedrins
I’m gonna be real real sad if we pay Monta Ellis as much as Chauncey Billups and Steve Nash, and Andris Biedrins as much as Tyson Chandler and David West.
I don't see your issue here...
The salaries won’t start as high, certainly. This is what I think we can expect for their salaries next year (with conservative estimates).
JRich this coming year: 12,222,222
Monta starting: 7M
Beans starting: 7M
BD: 18M
Jack:7M
Al:9M
Total: 60M
The salary cap is expected to be in the 58M range. Luxury tax should kick in at 69M. We’ve got Kosta 2M, our draft picks Wright 2.5M, Belinelli 1.5M, this year ~2M. Total is now 68M. You’ve got 10 players signed. You want to sign 5 more with $1M? I’m not seeing it.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 16, 2008 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Well, they don’t have to have 15 contracts. A team can go with 13 and hold spots in reserve, but your point is essentially correct.
$14mil next year for Biedrins and Monta may be overly generous as well. Either or both could exceed $7mil. Foyle is on the books towards the cap and tax next year for about $6mil too. With Richardson back the Warriors would be over the tax threshold at that point. If a team is a championship contender, it’s a reasonable price to pay. Paying the tax to be a borderline playoff team is poor strategy. It is unlikely to bring better future rewards. It is more likely to spiral soon into Knicks territory where a bad team has a terrible payroll than anything else. Richardson’s a good player. At his price, he’s not that good a player. He is also playing perhaps the most easily filled position on the court.
Sam, that's easy:
The Knicks. Regardless of cap status or the looming penalty of luxury tax, they’ll take anyone!!!
:)
by passionately objective on May 14, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Charlotte was the perfect team to trade with.
1. Forecast was a major issue. There are only a couple teams out there this year with enough money to afford Jrich without sending any money back which are Memphis and Philly. Both of which already have enough wings.
2. Charlotte had major cap room, a major hole at the 2 guard, needed a veteran to pair with their young team, and had a high lotto pick, but not too high to make it untouchable.
Yes, Jrich’s value was at an all time low, but if Charlotte is willing to take that deal, Mullin would’ve been a fool not to make it. It fixed a lot of holes in one move.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
Bad trade, plain and simple
The Warriors current playing style calls for lots of shot attempts and 3 pointers…so it doesn’t make any sense to get rid of the all-time franchise leader in 3 pointers made. Plus we lost depth and options—with no one to take pressure off Jackson, he got noticeably tired and lazy towards the end of the season when we needed a good kick in the pants the most.
With a healthier lineup, who knows what J-Rich would’ve brought to the table in this year’s tight playoff race, especially considering last season’s finish? Homecourt advantage in the first round, perhaps? A deeper run thanks to both health and experience?
If the salary cap was that much of a concern and a young big man was desired in the ‘07 draft, the better move would’ve been to trade Harrington-he’s a weak defensive presence for his position and he makes almost as much money as Richardson. If developing Monta was a concern, rotate the lineup-I could’ve sworn we had Davis, Ellis, Richardson, and Jackson starting a lot of games together towards the end of the ‘07 season.
Taking a look at who’s left in this year’s playoffs (or the second round of any year), the serious contenders have two things in common—at least two proven go-to guys, and personell depth. With the J-Rich trade, we lost both of those elements. It’s the break up of Run TMC all over again (seriously, Mitch RICHmond, Jason RICHardson, shooting guard wearing #23, etc.).
J Rich was the Man but...
its last years news, move on. The more we regurgitate this, the more bitter you all will become.
As my Grandpa used to say, “If if if if…If my Aunt had balls, she’d be my Uncle”.
Sleepy see's the light!
Because a young, long active 4 who runs the floor, finishes, crashes the boards, and defends the rim like a madman is something we could kinda use.
There is only one man that fits this bill. His name is…Joey Dorsey!
Umm...
We already have a younger, longer 4 who can finish. His name is Brandon Wright. Try again.
by Dubs fan in Boston on May 16, 2008 7:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Aww man.
The funny pictures don’ gone away.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
Aw rats!
No more “Mister Sleepy Freudo + Sam23”? That was one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen posted on this site. I swear, some people have no sense of humor….
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 16, 2008 2:15 AM PDT up reply actions
i caught it before it disappeared
Pretty creative actually… in an inappropriate kind of way i guess. Or maybe appropriate(???) since the timing coincided with the state supreme court’s ruling on same-sex marriages.
I pray i never have to use a gun again...
...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...
...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...
...But how often does that happen??
That's what i was thinking too.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
Let's see if these get past the censors


The relevant parties know who they are…
Sign ^^^^ !!!
by Sleepy Freud on May 16, 2008 5:29 AM PDT up reply actions

by 


















