Does this draft hold the direction of the Franchise in the balance?
Does this draft hold the direction of the Franchise in the balance?
When Mullin picks, trades, or both this week he will be setting the course of the franchise in both the near and long term. Hint: think long term.

Assuming Baron and Nelson are back for only one more season, our erstwhile GM must be wondering whether to go for it ala Boston or continue to build gradually. Likely he already has a notion of which direction – and the sheer absence of trade talk involving the Dubs other than some silly Yi talk and speculative agent-induced Varejao chatter shouldn’t indicate that Nelson is settling for a ho-hum draft of a #14 pick to back up a back up somewhere on the depth chart. Mullin characteristically plays his cards to the vest and no one really knows what he’s scheming. Still, his options are limited.
It is difficult to imagine how Mullin could replicate the Boston miracle of landing a couple major players to pair with Baron. He cannot trade Monta nor AB and must be hoping they do not get astronomical offers elsewhere. Jackson is not coveted, and Harrington’s contract is unlikely to bring back a big worth trading for. Any thoughts of trading Al must include a means of adding real depth inside – Wright and Beans can not be expected to carry us into WC playoffs. Unless Mullin trades the #14 for a pricey veteran using the TPE, the only way to add a significant player is through FA. Perhaps Mullin can make enough of an offer to a Turiaf-esque FA who resides on a team log-jammed at his position and significantly over the cap, but going beyond the MLE-level FA is extremely unlikely due to cap restraints. And while Turiaf type players might help us get back to the playoffs, we will likely not sniff the finals for quite some time.
The cap, and most poignantly Foyle’s continued contractual obligation, remains the self-inflicted albatross around Mullin’s neck. To re-sign both AB and Monta, two draftees, and the number of bench players necessary to keep the non-Nelson side of the bench from rising into a teeter-totter means that there simply wont be financial room to spend on many major additions.
This makes the draft all the more interesting assuming Mullin takes the BPA approach. We could see a talented wing drafted at #14 who could compete immediately with Bellinelli for minutes (anyone available at #14 is not going to help Nelson immediately elsewhere, and it’s not a lot to ask someone to be better than Marco). Who knows, maybe Mullin will replace Pietrus with another Frenchy – *Nic Batum*, or another Euro - *Danilo Gallinari* if the Nets don’t make good on their draft “promise”. We could look like Toronto-West. Maybe we take *Donte Green* (as prognosticated on DraftExpress). I’ve seen *Brandon Rush* (6'7" G) and could imagine him stepping right into some minutes right away for Nelson, while also being a major cog in our future. I’d be pretty happy landing Rush with a #14. If *Anthony Randolph* ( 6'11 Fwd) or *Alexis Ajinca* (7’1 C) slip to #14, Mullin might draft a big and who knows, maybe he reaches for *Robin Lopez* out of Stanford or *Darrell Arthur* (6'9" PF) out of Kansas. Trading up is as problematic as a straight trade for the simple reason that Mullin has so few tradable assets:
Baron can opt out, and though is unlikely to cannot be traded until declaring.
Harrington has a big contract, and plays our thinnest position.
Jackson is not very attractive with his contract, and history.
Barnes, Pietrus, Azubuike, Croshere, POB = all FA.
Ellis & Biedrins = RFA.
Kosta and CJ Watson have little trade value.
The X-factor is *Brandan Wright*- who is tradable, but would not net a return worth making the move unless it was for an over-priced big who Mullin would exercise the TPE on. If that kind of move is made, it would signal a go-for-it-now mode. But I can’t see any bigs on the horizon that would fit the requirements of being compatible with Nelson and Baron and available on the market, other than maaaaaybe, *Rasheed Wallace* (fat chance of that $12.5m contract being added here).
As much as I hate to say it, and I do hate it, the “smart” move may be no move & not exercising the JRich TPE. Most likely, Mullin will simply be drafting the BPA.
*Brandon Rush anyone?*
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
15
comments
Comments
Feeling you but...
I’m thinking the Dubs might trade down instead.
Kawakami’s latest blog suggests that we are very high on Jason Thompson currently and that we’re considering trading down to pick him up somewhere around #20. Seeing that we’re trying to schedule JT for a second workout, I think he’s right that at least this option is being considered seriously.
If this isn’t how things go down then I’m with u in thinking that the Dubs will go for a solid swing player like Rush or Green with the #14.
One thing I can say about Thompson is that he did a great job of marketing himself. Check out his web-site and his decently produced highlight tape...
"To be a great champion you must believe you are the best. If you're not, pretend you are." - Muhammad Ali
by Dubs Wise on Jun 22, 2008 8:13 PM PDT 0 recs
I agree with trading down
I agree with everything you are saying there re: difficulty of trading our assets. How about trading the 14th pick to New Jersey for the 21st pick and the 40th pick. They might well do this if the right player is available.
Then I would target PG-Mario Chalmers with the 21st pick, and a PF-D.J. White or Joey Dorsey with the 40th pick. I think you can still get a quality player at 40, while our current pick at 49 is just too low.
*note: depending on results of the draft, some team may be willing to dump salary after duplicating talent, at which point we can use our trade exception. That’s the only chance I see of getting some veteran help.
by warriordrp on Jun 22, 2008 8:35 PM PDT 0 recs
trading down
doesn’t sit well simply because I want to win sooner than later and those two lower picks are even less likely to be rotation players than the #14
If we had a stronger core and just needed bodies to fill out the roster then ya, maybe, but we need both to strengthen the core and fill out the roster (we have 5 FA + 2 RFA). Mullin thinks we’re “one player away” from being a legit WC playoff team. Unless we make a trade for an established vet using the TPE, if we trade down I’d interpret that as a move away from winning now – and maybe an indication of trading Baron in the near future if he doesn’t opt out.
by hardcore on
Jun 23, 2008 12:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Randolph looks like the biggest bust potential. He showed nothing in his year at LSU to make me think that he’s ready for the NBA.
by jae on Jun 22, 2008 9:07 PM PDT 0 recs
+1
Randolph has BUST written all over him more clearly than anyone who has come out in a while. That said; if he’s available at 14 it would be real hard to pass on that potential. I dont mind trading down into the 20’s to grab Thompson if Nellie really is that high on him, and I think adding an early 2nd round pick could add bench worthy player considering how deep the draft is. Ryan Anderson, DJ White, JJ Hickson are all attractive guys who could be there at the start of the 2nd round. As for the 49th pick how bout Drew Neitzel? I know he doesnt have the greatest athleticism or size, but he certainly has range. He wouldnt be my first choice, but its a name that hasnt been brought up much so I figured I’d kick it around here a little.
by sam23 on
Jun 22, 2008 10:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I would not mind
Trading Belinelli over the weekend. I would lve another lottery pick to add brandon rush, along with Marreese Speights. That would make us have a young decent bench, with the same speed, and sme lockdown D.
According to the comminsioner of the nfl, 104 people retired last year. 7 due to age, and the rest because of Patrick Willis
by montasmob69 on Jun 22, 2008 10:41 PM PDT 0 recs
Keep our pick and...
trade Harrington for Varejao and Damon Jones. Although i hate to part ways with Al, this is a win win situation for both sides.
Why the Cavs would do it: Time is running short for their role players as they are getting older (Wallace, Big Z, Wally). Cleveland needs more offensive pieces around James, as Wally, Big Z, and Gibson just aint cutting it for them. With the addition of Big Al, it will spread out their offense more. Big Z, Harrington, James, Wally, Gibson is a lineup that can put up points in a hurry for Cleveland.
Why the Warriors would do it: Varejao is a hybrid player that is willing to do the dirty work. Hes a great rebounder (8.3 2nd on Cle) and will fit in perfectly for us where all he has to do it get rebounds and the occasional tip in’s. Damon Jones a player that should be on the Warriors radar because he can split the carries with Baron. Although he is old, he is a perfect back up PG (career A/TO is 3-1). In fact, one point of Jones’ career, he avg 6 ast in just 24 minutes. This season, him and Brown have been on different pages during certain parts of the season where Jones once refused to play in a game when called upon. Sounds like he needs a new change of scenery.
by Spee-D on Jun 22, 2008 10:42 PM PDT 0 recs
Jason Thompson
Personally I’m not impressed by him. His main weapon seems to be Shaq-style backdowns and awkward hook shots, which won’t work in the league since he doesn’t have Shaq’s proportions. However, he seems to overpower everybody in his division. He gains ground on his drives not by quickness but by pushing and shoving. It doesn’t look like he has a left-hand hook shot.
As for defense: “he played little to no defense, lost his focus and failed to box out his opponents for rebounds on some key possessions” according to Draftexpress. For a guy who will realistically probably be a role-player/energy type in the NBA….. that doesn’t look good.
by antihero on Jun 23, 2008 1:07 AM PDT 0 recs
re TPE & trading Al
today J Hu reported Harrington may be Mullin’s only trading chip, other than using the TPE:
“Those likely to be available via trade that fit under the $10 million exception include Ron Artest, Marcus Camby, Nene, Leandro Barbosa, Boris Diaw, Mike Miller and Tayshaun Prince.”
“If the Warriors let their exception expire and still want to add a big name without increasing payroll – Rasheed Wallace, Chauncey Billups, Shawn Marion, Richard Jefferson and Michael Redd also are likely to be on the block, albeit at heftier prices – then Al Harrington could be the player most likely to move.”
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/23/SP0M11DFC6.DTL
I’d really rather NOT see Harrington traded for another big (unless Mullin can fleece a superstar and those seem few and far between) and certainly not for a perimeter player unless we obtained a higher draft pick along the way to replace Harrington. Though he is not a classic low post scorer nor volume rebounder, he still defends inside (remember the job he did on Yao Ming) and spreads the opponent’s defense for us.
by hardcore on Jun 23, 2008 12:05 PM PDT 0 recs
only problem
is he is too inconsistent in everything that he does.
One game instant offense or Yao stopper. Next game he’s 0 for 6 from downtown with 2 rebounds.
If we can package him along with the 14 to move up and draft either Love or Lopez, I’m all for it.
by misterjennings on
Jun 23, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Love or Lopez
definitely agree about Al’s inconsistency
guess I’m in the minority on Love – imo he’s not the second coming of Larry-legend and quicker 6’9 NBA defenders should shut him down easier than the Pac Ten players – who knows, maybe Love can top out as an Okur (Utah)? & assuming you mean B.Lopez I’d think he’ll top out close to Harrington in overall productivitiy. Both would be cheaper than Harrington with their rookie contracts, which means we’d get (another) TPE … ideally we get more depth at the PF rather than simply replacing Harrington with another Fwd, and a younger less experienced one to boot, isn’t going to help us soon enough to take advantage of Nelson/Davis. Which brings me back to we are looking at long term …
by hardcore on Jun 23, 2008 5:49 PM PDT 0 recs
Love or Lopez
“definitely agree about Al’s inconsistency”
Yeah, but neither love nor lopez can shoot like Al.
We don’t want to make the team worse just to punish Al for his inconsistency.
Instead of training a new youngster it might be easier to figure out what’s wrong with Al? Maybe it’s just a matter of tuning the game plan a bit to suit his talents?
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 23, 2008 10:59 PM PDT 0 recs
good point
Nelson has consistently stated a preference to play Harrington as a 6th man, and perhaps he’d use his skills differently in that role. Until and unless we add depth while keeping Al we’ll never know. Harrington did make it known last season he felt limited from using all his options offensively – ironic considering the free-flowing offense Nelson encourages.
by hardcore on
Jun 24, 2008 8:05 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Harrington had his best offensive year last year, and it wasn’t dominant. His effectiveness is limited by his reliance on the three which means he doesn’t draw many fouls. I’m not sure what ‘options’ Harrington thinks he has. Before he discovered his three point range, he was a substandard jump shooting PF who didn’t draw fouls, shot a poor-for-position percentage, and scored only through above average shot attempts. I guess he, like many guys, has an inflated opinion of his own ability.
by jae on
Jun 24, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
up
0 recs
re Batum
apparently he recently underwent another series of exams in Cleveland – after working out for the Raptors & Nets tests revealed he might have potential heart problems. He could fall right out of the first round, or entire draft … wow, on the one hand a real shame, on the other had he not been a world class athlete with sophisticated medical testing available to him he’d never have known. Basketball may have been his life, and may have saved it too.
by hardcore on Jun 24, 2008 10:27 AM PDT 0 recs










