RECAP: The Start of Free Agency
First off, props to the in depth fan posts that the community has been writing. It's been keeping the site going while us admins have been crazy busy with work, school, and sometimes both. I can barely keep up with everything that's happening but thanks to you guys, I can get my dose of Warriors info right here. So let me get this recap goin and apologies for some who might find this redundant but I'm going to write it anyways.
If nothing else, this offseason has turned out to be the exact opposite of what I thought it was going to be. After the Randolph and Hendrix draft picks, I figured this would be a pretty boring offseason - Baron doesn't opt out, resign Monta and Beans. Like high school girls, there seems to be a new rumor daily.
I'll be honest, I'm not at all happy with what Mullin has let happen to his team so far: Baron opts out and leaves, Maggette signs, Turiaf signs though Lakers can match, Harrington rumors, and Monta moving to the point.
Some thoughts after the jump...

Fire Mullin?
In terms of basketball and putting a winning team out there, it's debatable whether or not I'd keep him. I'd probably get rid of him. But he's really taking this entertainment business to the extreme. Even in the offseason he keeps Warrior fans on edge. Last year was the KG sweepstakes and this year we've got all sorts of drama. Taking out all basketball decisions, Mullin gets an A+ for keeping Warrior fans on the edge of their seats in what was thought to be a boring offseason. Entertainment at its best! Okay back to reality...
Karma is a ...!
All I gotta say is that what goes around, comes around. First, Mullin tells everyone that he is NOT trading Jason Richardson. Yay, we keep the playoff core together. Ooops. By the end of June, JRich was gone. People start to forget about it (though Atma likes to remind us all the time). So what happens next?
Baron tells everyone that he's not opting out and that he wants to be a Golden State Warrior. Oops. Nearly a year after Mullin told his lie, Baron pulls a Mullin - tells the media one thing and then does the exact opposite.
Oh but Baron got his too with Elton Brand leaving him high and dry. "Baron come to LA and we'll team up and take the West". Oops. After the Clips did everything Brand asked for he bolts for a little more money and a chance to play in the East.
All I can say is, what goes around, comes around. Elton look out. If everything works out as it seems to be, Iggy will be leaving that team for the Clippers.
Free Agency
Now to the recent signings, both of which I hate.
1) Corey Maggette: 5 years, $50 million
He's a very nice scorer and can get to the line better than any of the current Warriors. He'll fit in offensively, but he plays, at best, average defense. His body looks strong enough to grab more rebounds than he actually does. He better pick up that rebounding average to play on this team. I really like the signing at 6 or 7 million per season, but at $10 million per? I'll pass. Let him go back to the Clips or sign with a contender for the mid-level.
Oh and did I mention he's injury prone? He's never played a full season. The most games he's played was 77 and that was his rookie year in Orlando. So let me get this straight, Mullin doesn't want to extend Baron for 5 years because he's injury prone, but will sign Maggette for 5 years at $3 million less per year than Baron?
Let's not forget how Baron CARRIES this team. That's certainly worth $3 million more per year. Without a playmaker, I'm afraid of what will happen.
2) Ronny Turiaf: 4 years, $16 million
Way to sign someone who doesn't fit. Yay. Hopefully the Lakers match. I really want a backup center who can't play at the same time as Biedrins or Wright. None of those guys has the offensive game to complement the other.
If the Warriors were going to lock up money in a restricted free agent, there's some high energy guy in Houston I would have liked, Carl Landry.
3) Baron Davis leaves for 5 years, $65 million
Like I said in the Maggette portion, Baron is worth $13 per year for 5 years if Maggette is worth $10 per year for 5 years. If we're just going to throw money around, let's at least throw it at a star. So from my rudimentary mathematical skills, here's what I get. Maggette + Turiaf for 4 years on average will be $14 million per year and then an extra Maggette year at $10 million more. I know the Maggette number will not start at $10 and will increase each year, but whatever it's close enough for comparisons sake. Baron Davis for 5 years will cost $13 million per year. Mullin and co are telling me that Maggette and Turiaf are worth more than Baron? Hell no. I'm sorry that doesn't fly with me. If you were to offer me Baron Davis and $1 million for Maggette and Turiaf in a trade, I would jumping for joy.
So unless, these are stepping stones to a future bigger move, I'm not looking forward to this season. We just added a bunch of salary and we're in worse shape than we were last season. Unless Mullin has a grand scheme that we're not all privy to, color me skeptical and a disappointed Warrior fan.
1 recs |
147
comments
Comments
naw
my only agreement with you is about Turiaf. otherwise, mullins been doin a great job these last few seasons once he realized goofy tall white guys (dunmurphy) werent too good at basketball. maggette is a player that will thrive under nelson’s system, not to mention we would have never signed him unless baron had left, in regards to your comments about signing an injury prone player.
Finally, you call yourself a warriors fan but yet your not looking forward to this season?
by 3Kings650 on Jul 10, 2008 9:54 AM PDT 0 recs
asdf
sounds like hes questioning your fanhood.
ELEVATION SENSATON
by the noTORious TOR on
Jul 10, 2008 10:11 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Good points...
But I am going to have to respectfully disagree with you. I believe Baron would want more money to play in the Bay rather than LA. He WANTS to play in L.A. more than in Oakland. I think he kinda made his mind up that he wanted to leave. Like you said, he said one thing but did the other just like Mullin did. If anything, he would have opted for his last year of the contract and wouldn’t have taken any extension. To me it was either this year or next year and out.
What’s wrong with Maggette? He was the best free agent we could REALISTICALLY go after. He’s a better version of Kelenna and has got a knack for scoring which is the only thing you really need to be able do on this team with Nelson. I’m happy with 75 games from him, as long as all those games are productive.
Lastly, I agree that Turiaf was a horrible move and I’m worried they may not give Hendrix a chance because they seem to be similiar players. I’m not writing Mullin off though. The offseason ain’t over.
by Captain Jack on Jul 10, 2008 10:09 AM PDT 0 recs
A better version of Kelenna?
Maggette does not play D, is not a good part of an overall offense (passing ability/desire), and we can debate his 3 point % all day long.
He’s a solid natural scorer and good at getting to the line, but I’d rather save the money for another offseason than kill the flexibility on a mediocre player with a poor attitude who plays the easiest position to get a player for, especially in an uptempo system.
by dprodigy19 on
Jul 10, 2008 10:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Maggette does not play D, is not a good part of an overall offense (passing ability/desire), and we can debate his 3 point % all day long.
Not gonna argue the point on his defense. I certainly don’t think he’ll be the worst defender on this team, and I think our team D will be better due to this signing, just because it allows us to put Jack in the backcourt, but Maggette himself is not a defensive asset.
As to the “passing ability/desire” category… he scores efficiently. Efficient scorers are a healthy part of an overall offense. He’s not a great passer, but what he does works… he’s a better offensive player than J-Rich, for instance.
Three-point shooting? He shot for a better percentage behind the arc last year than any Warrior, and he took less than 40% as many threes as Baron. That’s a positive. You don’t have to think Maggette’s the best three-point shooter on our team going forward, but to pretend that’s a negative in his game is bizarre.
The desire/attitude stuff is a valid concern, I guess, but 1) the guy’s been playing for a coach who doesn’t value what he brings to the table, and 2) let’s not pretend like those weren’t potential issues with Baron.
Maggette’s not a home-run signing, but home-run signings weren’t out there this year… hell, Baron himself wasn’t a home-run signing. It was a good signing. The team will be better for having Corey Maggette.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Some good points
One that I’d like to push back on is Corey’s 3-point %
As a player who has 9 years of NBA experience, it’s only fair to go a little further back than last year.
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/corey_maggette/career_stats.html
One thing that’s fascinating about Maggette is that he played near identical total minutes in 2006-2007, but he attempted 1/3 as many threes that year and shot 20%. Looking further than that, Maggs has years with both few and many 3PA, but his percentage is generally between 30 and 33%. That’s still very good, but it puts him in the same range as Dirk and Bogans rather than the slightly higher group he’d be with otherwise.
As for the comparisons with Baron, I also find it important that Baron is a PG and Maggette is a SF, with the positional values varying dramatically. PG’s and bigs are golden, and the Warriors don’t have a ton of money now to go after any in a meaningful way, regardless of what Monta does (though I hope for the best, of course)
by dprodigy19 on
Jul 10, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Right… I don’t totally disagree on Maggette’s long-distance shooting. It seems like a little bit of crapshoot… the ‘06-’07 numbers are flat-out bizarre. Having said that, the fact that his best season was his most recent is somewhat encouraging, and moreso, the fact that he doesn’t hoist up six or seven a game is encouraging. He takes two or three a game. A guy like that isn’t going to gun you into a hole, the way Baron (or Jack) sometimes does.
Also agree on the positional stuff. PG > SF, Baron > Maggette; I agree wholeheartedly with both equations. However, a Baron/Monta backcourt is a flawed one. We just watched it for a year, and it was entertaining as hell… they also got absolutely torched a bunch of times by some middling players. There would be real negatives in committing to that backcourt long-term.
We’re now building around Monta. You can debate whether he’s the guy to build around (I think he is), but that’s clearly what we’re doing. If you see Monta as your best player, it makes sense to try to maximize the value of that guy, by testing him at the position where, if he can play it, he’ll have the most long-term success. If Monta can be a credible PG, Monta and a big, skilled 2 is a better backcourt than Baron and Monta: certainly better defensively, and potentially more efficient offensively.
It’s going to be tough going from watching one of the top PGs in the league to watch a guy try to master the position. It’ll be a bumpy ride, and like you, I’m not convinced that it’ll work. But Mullin and Nellie seem to think that it’s worth trying. If our goal is to win a championship down the road, I do too.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No arguments
I didn’t want Baron to re-sign. I wanted the money for someone else, ideally a PF to pair with Beans while rolling the dice on Shaun Livingston.
Monta will be a bumpy ride, but I still hold out hope that they’ll bring in a solid PG to be behind him so he can get some SG time too.
The other thing that kills me about the deal is that it squeezes out Kelenna’s minutes, and I love Buike. Besides Beans, he was my second favorite Warrior last year.
by dprodigy19 on
Jul 10, 2008 11:40 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Buike will get his run
Pietrus is gone, Barnes is gone, Buike is probably ahead of Belinelli at this point, he’ll still get his minutes.
I’m as sad as the next W’s fan that BD won’t be around next year, but let’s face it, he was gone after next year regardless, this just accelerated Mully’s post BD plan a year in advance. And I’m fine with Maggette @ 5/50, the dude will average 20ppg.
After Monta and AB’s contracts, we’d only have about $10 million to spend next year anyway. I’m not sure there are many better options in next years FA class @ $10/per better than Maggette. Maybe I’m wrong, I haven’t done a lot of research on next years class.
You may run like Hayes. but you hit like sh**!
by Orbit1099 on
Jul 10, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
up
0 recs
agreed on buike
As wing-happy as Nellie is, there could still be a nice chunk of time left for the guy.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 12:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
yeah
I agree with your agreement!
People complaining about our point guard situation are missing the, no pun intended, point; we’ll figure that out easily enough, whether this year or next. The real issue facing this team continues to be the lack of a top-tier big man. To our credit, we went hard after the one free agent who fit that description, but he went East. Josh Smith is fun and intriguing, but he’s not the big man that we need; Emeka Okafor is pretty good, but he’s not the big man that we need. There wasn’t a guy that we whiffed on… that guy’s just not out there.
I don’t think the signing of Maggette, or even the fact that we slightly overpaid for him, gets us farther away from getting that big man. I just don’t think a bad Warriors team would have a real shot at signing Boozer next summer, or Stoudemire in ‘10, even if those guys do bolt their teams. I also don’t see 17-65 coming from any version of this team, so I don’t think it’d come in the draft. If we’re going to get a guy like that, it’ll most likely be through a trade. And with or without Maggette, we have some interesting trade pieces.
This won’t be an elite team till we finally get a really good big guy to pair with Biedrins. But I don’t think that means we have to just do nothing until he comes. Maggette will help this team while we wait.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
up
0 recs
the problem is
Now the Warriors don’t have the financial flexibility to get any potential big man (in terms of the cap) for the foreseeable future. Spending $30m+ on the ME/AB/CM makes that essentially impossible. It could be a leveraged sign and trade but that’s about it.
The other possibility is the “Raef LaFrenz” idea, where you take a longer term deal to get more talent, sort of like the Jermaine O’Neal situation.
by dprodigy19 on
Jul 10, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Maggette/Ellis/Beidrins Contracts
I think they come out to closer to $25 million in 08-09, which should give them room for another decent FA signing.
Maggette gets $8 million this year. I see Ellis signing for Kevin Martin’s amount, 5/$55 million, which would be $9 million this season. Beidrins? I think the Warriors have leverage with him. There’s no team with cap space who will go after him (Memphis isn’t spending any money / maybe Altanta if the Clippers get Josh Smith, but probably not).
So their competition for AB, will be mid-level exception contracts. The Warriors low-balled AB last season. I’m guessing he signs for 5/ $47.5 million.
I don’t find the Maggette signing a bad contract. He had an excellent year last season. I’m guessing the Warriors were in the process of signing him to something like 4 years $36 million. He was to make $8.3 million this season, before opting out, so something over that per season. But when the Clippers lost Brand, I’m speculating Mullin upped the offer, to make sure they topped the Clips.
I actually think Maggette was one of the most underrated players in the league, the last few years, because he played for the Clippers. Also, Dunleavy is a medicore coach, and sat him too much for non-entitiies like Quinton Ross. The caveat for Magettee is that he plays 65 games a season (just like Baron Davis) and he’ll be 29 (just like Baron Davis).
But Nellie is the perfect coach for him. Maggette will score over 20 PPG. Trading Harrington now makes sense and giving Maggette AH’s role on the team. If the Warriors can get another above average player and keep their youth, they should be OKAY. Not great, though.
by San Francisco Slim on
Jul 10, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Your #'s are a little off
Maggette is getting $8.5m (maybe 8.6) this year for his salary # to work, so 8% up from that is $9,288,000.
Beans for 5/$47.5? You must be joking. Plus, even if it was that unreasonably low figure, they’d still be combining for over $25m.
Furthermore, taking those three guys at that price plus Jackson at $10m plus Wright, Marco, Randolph, Hendrix, and next year’s R1 and R2 puts them at the brink even without Al Harrington.
I’d pay good money to see how that team has cap space in 2009 unless Jackson and Harrington are traded for almost exclusively expiring contracts.
Oh, and I’d love to see why the Warriors had to outbid the Clippers, who didn’t appear to have any interest in Maggette once he opted out. (Granted, some but not all of that can be attributed to Brand)
by dprodigy19 on
Jul 10, 2008 2:13 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Isn't the inflation raise figure 10.5%?
I also heard Maggette’s contract is under $50 million, about $48-$49 million.
I don’t know, I just sense they are trying to lowball Biedrins.
Also, what sources do you have that say the Clippers wouldn’t sign Maggette? They were busy trying to sign Brand. I think the Warriors went after Maggette early, because of that. I agree that the Warriors spent more money than they had to, unless there was competition. The only competition could have been the Clippers. Or at least the Warriors perceived them as competition.
by San Francisco Slim on
Jul 10, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
8% raise
I believe you are limited to an 8% raise when you are signing another teams free agent. Monta and AB will be able to get the 10% raise per yr.
"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy
by olympicmike on
Jul 10, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks Mike
Yes, I stand corrected. Maggette should make about $8.4 million this season.
by San Francisco Slim on
Jul 10, 2008 4:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Though Maggette has been up and down in this regard, it is not uncommon for a player to rather substantially improve his three point shooting ability later in his career. Usually, what someone has done more recently is a better indicator than a career average. I say this with caution though, as Maggs has been up and down. On the positive, in the years he’s been terrible, it doesn’t look like he forces things and his shot attempts decline radically when his FG% declines. That’s good.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 2:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I believe Baron would want more money to play in the Bay rather than LA. He WANTS to play in L.A. more than in Oakland. I think he kinda made his mind up that he wanted to leave. Like you said, he said one thing but did the other just like Mullin did. If anything, he would have opted for his last year of the contract and wouldn’t have taken any extension. To me it was either this year or next year and out.
EXACTLY. The Baron/Maggette equation presumes that Baron would’ve signed with us for the terms with which he signed with the Clippers.
Baron was set to make $18 million this year. He ended up taking $13 million per, despite coming off probably the most FA-friendly season of his career. That’s a big comedown.
He was okay with doing it for the Clips, but 1) that’s his hometown, and 2) he thought Brand would be in the picture, and that it’d be a team that was closer to a championship than we were. Those are two HUUUUGE factors. Baron signed for $65M over five because that’s what it took keep Brand there, not because he’d happily take that to play anywhere.
People are complaining that Mullin’s willing to throw all this money around, just not at Baron. Well, which is more likely—that Mullin’s a complete idiot who thinks Maggette’s about as good as this team’s MVP, or that $65 million wouldn’t have been nearly enough to keep Baron here? Like everyone else, I’m in the dark on what actually happened, but the latter seems much more likely to me.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I guess we'll never know but...
Here’s what I think:
- Mullin just didn’t want Baron around for 5 more years
- Despite teaming with Brand and going back home, Baron would have taken the same money to stay here. He’s got Nellie (his perfect coach), the Bay Area fans vs Clipper fans (we’re the best right?), Jax/Harrington, and a 48 win team.
Let’s say you’re right that it would have cost Baron more money to stay here and he would rather play with Brand and in his hometown. Fine he leaves for LA. That still doesn’t excuse giving Maggette $50 million. Does anyone think he’s worth that money?
by Fantasy Junkie on
Jul 10, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Maggette Comps
Everyone is overpaid to a certain degree…But I’d gladly overpay Maggs at 5/50 for the production he’ll give us than say Redd or Rashard Lewis who are making max $$.
At $10/per he’s making Rip Hamilton/Tayshaun money. Heck, Bobby Simmons is making $10/per.
You may run like Hayes. but you hit like sh**!
by Orbit1099 on
Jul 10, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
In terms of production, I’m not entirely convinced that Maggette’s not worth that amount… the fourth and fifth years, maybe not, but in this market, I don’t think $10 million per is unreasonable for his services. Where I agree with you is that nobody else was going to pay him that much, so even if he’s worth $50 mil (debatable), we still probably should’ve been able to get away with paying him less. $40 million, whether for four years or five, would’ve been dandy… this certainly wasn’t Rashard Lewis-level bad, but it was an overpay.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 1:21 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Agreed
We overpaid and were going to have to overpay to get him. But the amount of extra money we gave him? That’s what bothers me. At $40 for 5, I’d be okay with that. Throwing in an extra $10 hopefully doesn’t cost us down the line. And even though he’s getting $8.5 or so this year, that’s going to escalate each year as he gets older. Not good.
In terms of basketball skills though, I really like Maggette and he fits on the team. He’s a type of offensive scorer that the Warriors just don’t have so it’s a nice mix between Monta and Maggette. I like him on the team, just not at the cost.
by Fantasy Junkie on
Jul 10, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Agreed completely
Maggette is a terrible complement to what the Warriors have, and spending money on the lowest-value position on the floor (with the most viable alternatives) is exactly the way to stay irrelevant.
I’m petrified the Warriors are going into what I’ve called “Sixerland” for years- just good enough to narrowly miss the playoffs and not get an impact player in the draft (too low a pick, though Mullin would screw that up probably too) and too much money tied up in other players to sign a free agent.
Assuming Monta and Beans are back in the fold, the Warriors will have somewhere near $33.5m committed for those three players ($10.3m for Maggs, $23.5 for ME/AB with the 10% raises). So a team without a PG or PF only has around $30m to have the rest of a team.
by dprodigy19 on Jul 10, 2008 10:10 AM PDT 0 recs
asdf
sounds like he’s questioning your fanhood.
ELEVATION SENSATON
by the noTORious TOR on Jul 10, 2008 10:10 AM PDT 0 recs
Why can't Turiaf play with Beans/Wright?
I don’t see why we couldn’t play Turiaf with Beans/Wright….I’ve had to suffer through way too many Lakers games thanks to my husband and Turiaf is the only one in gold and purple that I liked….Sure he’s no offensive beast but he has way more of a jumper than Beans (don’t really know about Wright yet) and can hit it with some consistency.
Personally, I think the Warriors really need someone like Turiaf coming off the bench…pure energy & focus on defense and rebounding, not going to worry about his points or minutes, a good team player who will always give 110%...plus like I said, he does have a relatively consisten jumpshot
by the wingless one on Jul 10, 2008 10:13 AM PDT 0 recs
IF the Lakers don’t match for Turiaf (and reports are totally mixed as to their leanings) Turiaf will come here with what is really a low minute backup salary (yes, $4/year is backup salary in the NBA) and I wouldn’t expect him to play much more than that. Figure 10 to 20 minutes a game depending on situations. He does appear to have some range on his jumper for a PF/C, so I can see him paired with Biedrins OR Wright for short stretches to go big without getting in their “close to the basket high percentage scrap points” way. He’s an above average passer for a big too, one who doesn’t turn the ball over much, and this speaks of a possibility that he can set up in high post to either take the jumper, or look for the open man in (Wright or Andris) or out on the wing.
Best thing I’ve heard about him is that it’s annoying to play against him. For 10 minutes a night, that can be helpful.
Seriously, I wonder what people actually expect they’re gonna get that’s better at that price that can be acquired at that price. Fantasies of matchable RFAs are fantasies.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 2:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Playing with Beans and Wright
The reason I don’t think he’ll play well with Beans and Wright is because neither Beans, Wright, nor Turiaf are scorers. Nellie wants at least 4 scorers on the floor. Just because Turiaf can shoot 50% and hit an open jumper every now and then doesn’t mean he’s going to complement the rest of the squad. If he’s going to play at the same time as Wright or Beans, he’s going to be taking more shots than he’s done before. And if you look at his FG% as he took more shots, it’s gone way down (nearly 7%).
by Fantasy Junkie on
Jul 10, 2008 3:57 PM PDT
up
1 recs
YAH BUT...
even if TURIAF played at the same time as BEANS or WRIGHT, what’s wrong w/ that? Having MONTA, MAGGS and JAX isn’t enough offense/scoring?
I know NELLIE wants to outscore opponents, but that’s because he’s never really had a shutdown defender! I’m not saying TURIAF is one, but he definitely brings a defensive presence to the team! And don’t get me wrong, I actually HAAAAATE TURIAF. He seems arrogant and acts like a bully, but as JAE mentioned, he would be probably be annoying to play against! Reminds me kind of like RODMAN (not skill-wise). You hated him as a person or as an opponent, but that’s what made him valuable to your team. He got into the opponents’ heads!
by scottiepimppen on
Jul 10, 2008 4:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Actually
Turiaf’s a nice guy, a good team-mate, and will eventually become a fan favorite (that’s if LA doesn’t match). He’ll be the second-coming of Chris Gatling for the W’s. You watch.
by miguelito on
Jul 10, 2008 11:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
That’s quite possibly true about Nellie’s lineups. It does seem like Nellie has a tendency to go overboard on scoring at the expense of defense. I’m not certain I’d write off Wright as a scorer so quickly though. He’s immensely talented and I’d not be at all surprised to see him assert himself more on offense this year.
I would also add that Nellie’s real identifying characteristic as a coach is that he tries to maximize what he has. He’s also one of the few coaches in the league for whom there’s an identifiable positive effect on someone’s statistics. Guys really do tend to play better for him. It’s been true for quite some time.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 5:30 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Wright
Hey if you’re right about Wright, I’ll be pleasantly surprised. He’s immensely talented but I just don’t see him becoming a scorer. He’ll get putbacks, alleyoops, quick floaters, but he doesn’t look like he’ll be a guy who you can dump the ball into or give to 15 feet out on the perimeter and say score.
I also agree that Nellie gets the most out of his guys, but Turiaf doesn’t seem to have the skill set to complement Beans and Wright in Nellie’s system. Two non-scorers on the floor at the same time? Unless Nellie changes his philosophy it’s not going to work.
Hopefully I’m wrong.
by Fantasy Junkie on
Jul 10, 2008 11:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Turiaf as backup center
Didn’t read all the comments I’m replying to but I doubt both Beans & Wright will be playing at the same time as Turiaf because he’s slotted to be Bean’s backup at center.
by gunwing54 on
Jul 10, 2008 11:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mullie's started to speak about recent events...
His comments make it sound like he’s been anticipating all of these moves and they have been very deliberately thought out and planned. I wonder. Initially it all seems like knee-jerk reactions to offset the embarrassment of losing Baron. It would be interesting to see if he had any preliminary talks with Areanes and Brand’s agents before he started to throw out all of those high priced bids.
The big test will be if and when he signs AB and Monte. He’s been talking about it, but if they are the centerpieces of the franchise, you’d think they would be closer to doing the deal.
by candlestickkid on Jul 10, 2008 10:14 AM PDT 0 recs
If they’re still on the free agent/trade market, they do not want to sign these guys yet because when they do, their cap holds get replaced with real dollars and we will likely lose the remaining cap flexibility. Turiaf ain’t a done deal and they still have a bit of room so they could still be shopping.
We don’t know how close they are to getting a deal done. One thing that seems clear since Nelson arrived is that Mullin doesn’t make his plans and actions freely available to the media until something is already agreed upon. Rushing things doesn’t seem to serve a purpose, save to silence anxious fans who are looking for reasons to criticize things.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I've found my thread.
Finally, a group that does not blindly follow Mullin. dprodigy19 is right, we’ve always been not good enough for the playoffs, but not bad enough for a high pick. Warriors should just bite the bullet and let Wright and Bellinelli start and if we end up with 15 wins next season, so be it. By then we’d really know if this young corp has a chance in hell to run with the big boys in the west. On top of that, we’d have a high pick and a ton of money for next year’s crop of free agents. That’s how you rebuild a team (Miami). The past 10 off-seasons have pretty much played out the same way going back to St. Jean. Paying too much for mediocre free agents, rationalizing to themselves that there might be some sort of hidden value yet to be unlocked within them (Caffey for $35 million among others, and pretty much every Mullin signing). It didn’t help that Mullin was groomed by St. Jean in this kind of environment. Panicky and hair-triggered. The Warriors have no history in landing superstar players through free agency so any expectations regarding next year’s crop with Mullin at the helm is somewhat of a pipedream. Twardzik deserves just as much blame for his tenure, but 10 years should have been plenty of time to right this ship. Let’s hope that when Nellie leaves, the team doesn’t implode.
by damnit on Jul 10, 2008 11:10 AM PDT 2 recs
couple things
1) They’ve made some good moves, but the Heat are the reigning worst team in basketball… let’s not call them “rebuilt” just yet. We were one of the very worst teams in the league several times in the Dark Era; we should know it’s not a given that teams like that can easily improve. Besides, fuck the Heat and their tanking. I’m not down with anything like that.
2) If we re-signed Beans, Monta and ‘Buike, and made no other moves, yes, we’d have cap space next year. We wouldn’t have the most cap space, or anything like it. What’s our plan? There are a lot of great players that could become unrestricted, but most won’t. Essentially we’d be in the same position a year from now: losing out on the bidding for a guy like Boozer to a team with more to offer (more money, better team, more attractive place to play), or we’d be overpaying for Drew Gooden or some shit.
Once Monta and Beans are resigned, we’re just not going to be a top-tier free agency player. You can say we could just trade away Harrington and Jack for even more space, but that’s not going to happen… almost every team, like us, wants to get rid of guys like that for space. This is really the only time we’ll be able to spend. I wish we’d have netted something a little sexier than Maggette and Turiaf (though to be fair the summer’s far from over), but I certainly don’t think it’s a disaster. Those guys will help our basketball team.
by onlxn on Jul 10, 2008 11:23 AM PDT 0 recs
us admins have been crazy busy with work, school, and sometimes both
Glad to hear you guys are busy, never can tell in this economy . Keep the focus on your goals , this Warriors team stuff will sort it’s self out despite all our input, sorta like national politics, can’t live with it but can’t live without it!
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 10, 2008 11:25 AM PDT 0 recs
I almost completely agree with FJ...
The Maggette signing was horrible at best. He was slated to make $7 mil next season… and other teams were offering him the full MLE ( $5.5 mil). Now I agree that Maggette did have a career year last year, albeit it was on a injury prone Clipper team where he himself did not play a complete season. The second best scorer they had was Kaman 15 ppg, and he didn’t play a full season. The point I’m trying to get at is his stats were semi inflated last season because he was on a predominatly weak team. I would have gladly accepted this signing had it been at 3 years $26 mil (a little more than $8 mil/yr)... or even 5 years $40 mil ($8 mil/yr)... but to sign him at that price tag is definately jumping the gun and screams “DESPERATION” on the part of Mullin & Co. Now if you’re going to throw $10 mil a year on someone, could it at least be someone who has played a full season in his career or someone with a little more passing ability (i.e. a Josh Childress or an Iguodala… well throw in a couple mil more for Iguodala).
Now picture this: If Maggette received $10 mil/yr… what do you think Beans & Monta will want? I would assume that Monta is at least 3 times better than Maggette…. so this signing may be more of a shot in the foot than anything. I’ll assume that Monta will ask for, and receive more than Maggette with Andris following suit. Is this for certain? Of course not… but these players and their agents are definately not dumb! They’ll see their place in the pecking order and want to get paid accordingly.
Where I don’t agree with FJ is the Turiaf signing… I don’t mind it that much. $4 mil is definately a decent amount. I don’t fully believe that Turiaf is worth that much… but the Warriors had to sign him to something they thought the Lakers wouldn’t have matched. Turiaf is a very high energy defender and at the same time an underrated smart player on the offensive end. If he does meet expectations, or exceed them, then his signing would be a steal. I know we have Richard Hendrix, who is a similar player, but Turiaf is NBA proven.
As for Harrington… I don’t really want to see him leave. If he’s asking for a trade, don’t just give him away for some scrubs. We can get higher value for him next season as an expiring contract over this season… but many teams in the east are still looking for a PF (and Harrington fits that mold). If we can get a PG as well as an expiring, then I’m all for it. Just don’t make it a “Harrington for Jaric” trade where we’ll be worse off with a terrible contract. Unfortuantely… I can see a move like that happening because after all… we are the Warriors.
by Mr. Monday Night on Jul 10, 2008 12:05 PM PDT 0 recs
stupid blurry first paragraph
The Maggette signing was horrible at best. He was slated to make $7 mil next season… and other teams were offering him the full MLE ( $5.5 mil). Now I agree that Maggette did have a career year last year, albeit it was on a injury prone Clipper team where he himself did not play a full season. Now think about this, the second leading scorer was Kaman at 15 ppg… and then another drop off after that. The point I’m getting at is his numbers were slightly inflated last season. To sign him at $10 mil is ridiculous to say the least, when he probably could have been had at $8 mil/year. I would have been happier with a 3 year/ $26 mil contract or even a 5 year/$40 mil contract. But for a guy who has been injury prone, he isn’t worth $50 million dollars.
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Check out what Maggette’s done over his career. It’s pretty consistent, especially when you control for minutes played. Rebounds were actually down last year. I’m not sure it’s a career year. It’s more or less inside the normal variation we’ve seen from Maggette since he came into the league.
Injury prone? Yeah, but save one year, he’s available more often than not. He appears on average to be good for somewhere around 70 games. Actually, it looks like you can count on him missing about a dozen games, but it’s only been once that he’s missed many more.
I’d be happier with 3/$26 too. We don’t know if that would have gotten things done though.
Good signing, not a great one, but should, even at the salary, make the team better than the realistic other options.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
What about its effect on the resigning of Monta & Beans?
How do you think it will affect those talks. Now you have to agree that Monta is worth more to this team than Maggette does. How will that translate in negotiations?
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Looking over Maggette's career....
He has missed between over 12 games/season 5 times… peaking at 75 games last season (after going for 77 in his rookie season). With the 32 game season removed from the equation, he does average about 12 DMP – Injuries per season. That’s still a health risk given his large contract. As far as the fluctuation of his productivity, he has been consistent, averaging about 19 ppg and 5.5 rpg during the last few seasons… it’s his overall game that I’m worried about, as he is essentially a one on one type of player who is not affiliated with a high ball movement team like the Warriors. I’m concerned about his ability to move the ball around while maintaining his effectiveness on the boards.
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 3:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You're wong on all counts.
Fire Mullin?
Who traded Dale Davis for Baron Davis?
Who traded Dunleavy & Murphy for Jackson & Harrington?
Who drafted Andris Biedrins & Monta Ellis?
Who dumped a terrible JRich contract for a potential star in BWright?
Think again.
Maggette was a bad signing at $10M/year?
Maggette is better than JRich, and will be making $3M/year less. Pietrus signed for $6M/year, Jason Terry makes $10M/year, Jamal Crawford makes $10M/year. I don’t think you understand the NBA payscale.
You’re sad that we didn’t pay Baron $13M/year for 5 YEARS!?
I agree that he’s worth at least $13M/year, but NOT for 5 years. That is crazy talk. You really think he won’t blow his twice surgically repaired knee out? Baron has two bad knees, a bad back, and a TERRIBLE work ethic. I’d be surprised if he makes it 3 more years (he’ll be 32). Sure Maggette will miss about 10g/year due to little injuries here and there (because he’s constantly smashing to the hoop and getting to the line), but he’s a much better bet to be a good player in 4-5 years.
Ronny Turiaf doesn’t fit?
Do you even watch basketball? Turiaf is a perfect fit for this team. He is a banger, and a big time energy player with some pretty good speed, athleticism, and length. He can rebound, block shots, and pass pretty well too (had about 10 games with 5+ assists).
I’ve heard so much dumping on all the Warrior moves thusfar, and I really don’t understand it. Guess you haven’t been a warrior fan or watching basketball as long as I have, but I know what a bad team looks like, and frankly this still looks like a borderline playoff team. Mully is doing a great job!
by warriordrp on Jul 10, 2008 12:11 PM PDT 0 recs
well...
I think we did overpay a bit for Maggette… comparing his contract to some actively bad contracts doesn’t mean that we didn’t. It’s far from the worst contract in the league, but we overpaid… I just don’t buy that we needed to give him five years and $10M per.
I agree with all your other points, though… a 32-year-old Maggette’s a better bet than a 32-year-old Baron, and Mullin deserves a little more benefit of the doubt than he’s been getting. He’s done an overall good job for the last three years, and an absolutely spectacular job for the past eighteen months.
by onlxn on
Jul 10, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Maggette is not better than J-Rich
Whoa…. whoa…. whoa. Do you honestly think that Maggette is better than Jason Richardson? Let’s compare the career numbers side by side:
Richardson: 75 games per season, 19 PPG, 5.5 rebs, 3 apg, 1 spg, 2 to’s pg
Maggette: 65 games per season, 16 ppg, 5 rpg, 2 apg, less than 1 spg & 2 turnovers per game
Not only is Richardson more durable than his counterpart, but he scores more and is a better 3 pt shooter. Maggette excells at the ft line.
Ok ok… I get it. Last season?
Maggette: 70 games, 22 ppg, 5 boards, 2 apg, 1 spg & 3 to’s
Richardson: 82 games, 22 ppg, 5 boards, 3 apg, 1 spg & 2 to’s.
Very similar numbers, but Richardson still brought it for 12 more games and was more careful with the ball (1 to per game is a big difference). IMO, Maggette deserves to make less than $3 mil/yr than Richardson… infact he doesn’t deserve to come that close. $8 mil/yr would have been more adequate for a player of his caliber with his history of injury.
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Maggette is not better, he's more efficient
The numbers don’t tell the entire story (don’t take this as a J-Rich bashing, I love the guy)...
Maggette took about 450 less shots than JR to average the same amount of points. I think JR fell in love with his jump shot which (up until last year) was inconsistent at best. I think Maggette adds some of the rebounding/toughness that we lacked last year from the guard spot.
5/50 is the going rate for swingmen who put up those numbers.
You may run like Hayes. but you hit like sh**!
by Orbit1099 on
Jul 10, 2008 12:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I agree that Maggette will add some rebounding that we lacked last year from the guard spot...
But he will be taking over the SF spot. Now unfortunately, that means that our rebounding situation is going to be similar to last year. Baron averaged 5 boards per game… which is around Maggette’s average… and I’ll venture to say that both Monta & Jax hover around last year’s figures as well. That isn’t necessarily a boost, its more of a different look.
As for more efficient shooting, Maggette edged Richardson, shooting 45% for his career over 43.5% for Richardson. And Maggette is a better FT shooter. I just believe that Richardson is a better all around player than Maggette is. The numbers are fairly similar, but their style of play is vastly different.
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 2:02 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Per game measures can be specious.
Per minute, Maggette scores more points and pulls down more rebounds. For his career, it’s taken Maggette 13.5 FG attempts to get 20 points. For Richardson’s career, it’s taken him 16.5 shot attempts to get 19 points. Hmmm. Fewer shots, more points. Even if you subtract a possible attempt for the turnover, Maggs is scoring more and providing two more shots for teammates to take. Think that his teammates always miss those shots? Since the average return of FG attempts is more than a point a shot, it’s real, real unlikely that those extra shots are meaningless. Maggette’s a more effective offensive weapon, a superior rebounders.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Saying Maggette is a superior rebounder is an overstatement...
Jae… look at the two guards side by side and their rebounding numbers are very close, even factoring in minutes played. Now I’m no expert in the use of PER, but if you aren’t getting those minutes per game, there’s a reason why you’re not earning those minutes. Now I do admit that Maggette does shoot at a more effective clip and is excellent at getting to the free throw line, but their overall games are vastly different. Without factoring in their contracts, if you had your pick between the two, who would you rather have on the Warriors?
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 3:14 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I’m unfortunately unable to look beyond their current salaries. But on pure productivity, if I can have both at the same price, it’s close. I’m a sucker for rebounds and high efficiency scoring. Given that I’ve seen Richardson play more often and know that he’s somewhat of a liability handling the ball, that he’s not a defensive stopper either, I’d give a slight edge to Maggette overall. At his best (when he came back from the injury a year ago) Richardson was better than Maggette had ever been. But Maggette has been more consistently good. The variance in his production is pretty low.
I do not believe that minutes are always “earned” and that because a player on one team gets 38 minutes he must somehow be more deserving than a player on a totally different team with different teammates and a different coach who “only” gets 36mpg.
by jae on
Jul 10, 2008 5:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Well I wasn't referring to them...
I was referring to the overall PER system. PER systems heighten the perspective of a bench player’s ability to produce to a certain extent.
As for Maggette’s defense…. there is a reason why the Clippers played Quinton Ross heavy minutes vs. letting Maggette take a majority of it, and its because of his inability to play on the defensive end as well as Ross. Ball handling must also be a problem for Maggette, as he averaged about 3 to’s/game last season, and has been that way for a majority of his career. Its more or less a tomato vs tomahtoe type of discussion, but I’d respectfully say that I’d choose Richardson because of his ability to stretch the floor.
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 10, 2008 6:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Anyone who’s read here for not too long knows my general opinion of PER (Hollinger’s system) and wouldn’t ever expect me to defend it in any way. Do not confuse PER (all caps) with “per” as in “per minute” or “per game”.
I’m having a hard time following your “logic”. Are you still referencing Maggette with discussion of bench players?
by jae on
Jul 11, 2008 12:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Maybe a borderline playoff team in the East
To me, there’s no question that the Lakers, Spurs, Hornets, and Jazz are in Tier 1.
After them, it’s the Rockets, Suns, Mavs, Blazers, Nuggets, and Warriors. As such, the Warriors are in the 2nd tier of the conference, but they need to do well to move into it. Regardless, do we want a perpetual 7-8 seed?
And please don’t dump on critical people as not being real fans- they are in no way correlated. Just because someone disagrees with a move does not make them any more or less of a fan, just like how dissent and patriotism are unconnected.
by dprodigy19 on
Jul 10, 2008 12:40 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm all in favor of criticism...
When it’s warranted. I just don’t think all of this Maggette bashing and Baron lovefest is warranted. Baron Davis is supremely talented, but he is an underachiever. Look at how his production fell off at the end of the year when the Warriors really needed him. And Maggette is no All-Star, but people shouldn’t disregard a 22pt scorer who does so efficiently. I think with the improvement of Ellis, Biedrins, Wright, & Belinelli and the additions of Maggette and Turiaf, we’re quite possibly looking at a better team. People always overreact so i’m not really surprised.
Make no mistake, I’m not questioning anyone’s fan-hood. I really could care less about that. I’m just questioning their basketball knowledge, which seems severely lacking.
by warriordrp on
Jul 10, 2008 6:35 PM PDT
up
1 recs
Just as a clarification
I’m not a Baron supporter either- I wanted the Dubs to save the money for the right guy, and I think Maggette was far from that considering his position and who he is as a player.


