To all the Mullin haters
Look, I am sick and tired of reading posts where people bash Mullin. He isn't a perfect GM - but he is a good one and he has learned over the years.
He made mistakes early on by locking up Dun, Murph, Foyle and signing Fisher to too much money (although if Fish didn't have to be the go to guy at times it wouldn't have been so bad).
He learned from this and over the years got rid of bad contracts - that is a sign of a good GM (versus the Isiah Thomas types who TAKE on bad contracts)
When he got Baron - that was the FIRST significant star to CHOOSE to sign with the dubs that i can remember. Already, this puts him in the good GM category in my book. Consider all the previous GMs and think about who they got to come in and save the day (Mookie Blaylock, Hughes?)
He took a gamble on SJax when nobody would touch him and it turned out to be a genius move. Al hasn't been a star but he's better than Murphy for our style of play.
He convinced a great coach in Nelson to return to the team - lured him off the golf courses in maui. Now, Nellie may not have won a championship but having discussions about whether or not Nellie ball can win a title is better than wondering if a team coached by Mussleman can make the playoffs.
Seeing that he had guys with similar skills to JRich, he traded him for Wright - a guy he feels could be a star someday. he may be wrong on this, too soon to tell, but JRich (and I love this guy - in the top three for alltime favorite warrior) peaked and his skills are duplicated by guys like Buike, Monta, Pietrus. This was a gamble move no doubt, but good GMs take risks, in my mind the jury is still out on this one.
Mullin deserves credit - like Nellie and the players for making our team one of the most exciting teams in the league the last couple seasons - and especially for making us finally relevant again. All those WE BELIEVE moments were due at least in part to Mullin - if that doesn't help you appreciate him I don't know what does. The JA Adande article in ESPN leads me to think we will continue to be one of the funnest teams to watch for years to come. Mullin gets credit for that.
Now, on to the Baron issue. I really believe in my heart that Baron wanted out. Comments he has made about wanting to be in LA say it all for me. I wish him the best and really think signing him to a long term big money deal may have been good for us for one or two seasons - but not 4 or 5. It is less to me about his durability and skills dropping off (though we saw how old CPaul made him look), and more about creating space for others to step up as playmakers and team leaders and allstars and thinking 4 or 5 years ahead, not just one year ahead. Mullin isn't to blame for Baron leaving so STOP putting that on him - he has tried to respond in the offseason and this board has had a mixed response. Maybe a great GM finds a way to keep Baron and build around him better - but I think Mullin is a good one, not a great one - and certainly not an awful one as some suggest.
Offseason moves - we gain a VARIETY of players with different skill sets to prepare us to for matchups and provide depth at each position. We LOSE a group of swingmen who range from solid backups who may be starters some day (Buike) to seriously inconsistent low skilled guys who play off emotion (Barnes). The thing is - they all are 2s and 3s. Some complain we don't have any proves stars on the roster - and I agree - but Monta may become one this year, SJAX has been a star at times, and in a couple years we will see about Wright and Randolph. However, without the proven star you MUST have depth at each position, and we have that now. It is hard to say how well this team will do - I predict about 35 wins this year and then the playoffs in the year after that.
Lots of people here compare who we lost to who we got and they see a drop off. But, if you take baron out of the mix - I think our team is better than last year. Again, Baron wanted to be in LA. Shoot, if you take Baron and Maggette out the mix I still see an upgrade - if only because it adds depth.
Part of why people here love CJ and Buike and Barnes is because they gave us memorable, at times magical, moments over the years. We are fans and we see them in our uniforms doing great stuff and we grow to cherish them. But if you step back from that position - you see a group of limited and inconsistent swing men who are all backups. We got a variety of backups in return who may win our hearts as well.
Some choices he has made I disagree with. Did he get the best possible players for each position that were available in the off season? No. But we must remember that he is also competing with many other teams for these guys services. Its hard to know how much a player coming here or not has to do with the agent, the GM or the player. For example, Brand wanted to be in the east where he has a shot for a title - is this Mullin's fault? Should he have use the MLE when he had the chance? yes - but, oh well, that MLE wasn't going to bring us a superstar. Is he to wed to Harrington and Nelson at times? Yes, but in this biz of real people who have relationships to each other, who are fiercely competitive and who form bonds - it isn't suprising.
If we say a great GM makes good choices 90% of the time, a good GM makes one 70-75% of the time, and a decent one makes good choices 50% of the time, and a bad one makes them 20% of the time (or makes no moves at all when his team sucks) - then I think Mullin is a good GM. He used to be decent and now he is approaching good.
Maybe it is because I have been a fan since the days of Sleepy Floyd but I have seen bad GM'ing on the Warriors for many years and know what it looks like - Mullin isn't it. Perhaps most of the people on this site are newer warrior fans and don't know the misery of the past - but trust an old timer - Mullin has given us something we haven't had in years - a relevant and exciting Warrior team.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
46
comments
Comments
Seeing that he had guys with similar skills to JRich, he traded him for Wright
Probably the stupidest move any GM has made in the last few years. Get to the playoffs after 13 years then trade your 2nd best player, fan favorite and heart of the team?
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol stalkin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 23, 2008 9:54 AM PDT 0 recs
Actually
JRich was traded for cap flexibility and to acquire the piece Mullin thought would bring us Garnett. I’m laughing at the 2nd best player thing and this team had the heart LAST year, just didn’t have the legs. Skeptic, you’re a smart guy, don’t let your emotions intervene where logic is present. It was a risk to bring us a franchise player in hopes of shoring up a struggling D (in which JRich was one of the weakest links). I miss JRich’s personality too but am glad we’ve moved his monster contract.
by Hoof on
Jul 23, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
0 recs
And yet somehow
At the time of the trade, a good number of observers, fans, and experts, thought it was a damn clever trade. I guess they’re just not as smart as you.
Seriously, Skep: do you really not get tired of making the same post over and over? Not sure what the official definition of “trolling” is, but you’re definitely flirting with it with JRich stuff.
Here’s another analogy for you, not that I expect it to make any kind of dent: the Red Sox, after winning the WS for the first time in 86 years, let Pedro Martínez, their best pitcher, fan favorite, and heart of the team walk the Mets because they didn’t want to overpay him — thought they could do better with $14M a year than an injury-prone pitcher who was showing signs of decline. And they basically did. As a GM, you sometimes have to make unpopular decisions in the interest of the team’s longer term health.
(Yeah, yeah … JRich wasn’t in decline when they traded him. But then at his peak, Pedro was the greatest pitcher of all time, while JRich was, you know, a serviceable starting NBA shooting guard).
Sign ^^^^ !!
by Sleepy Freud on
Jul 23, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
up
0 recs
J-Rich talk...
Where’s azntiger at! His J-rich ramblings are off the chain!
by Tony.psd on
Jul 23, 2008 10:55 AM PDT
up
0 recs
do you really not get tired of making the same post over and over?
Not really! I like to hold guys responsible for their actions. Since we missed the playoffs next year it was obviously a bad move. Jrich’s talent is not the main thing he brought, it was his effect on the rest of the players and fans, with Jason we believed without him they dint.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol stalkin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jul 23, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
up
0 recs
actually
we finished six games better without richardson so it was a good move
"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006
by flipgatey3 on
Jul 23, 2008 4:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
It could’ve easily been 12 games better with a playoff appearance…so it was a bad move.
by J-Triumf on
Jul 23, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
i'll take what happened
over a hypothesis…there’s no guarantee that it is the case. he coulda gotten hurt again, and he definitely woulda taken lots of monta’s minutes as well…
"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006
by flipgatey3 on
Jul 23, 2008 11:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
i'll take what happened over a hypothesis
I prefer the hypothesis, we kept Jason, traded up in the draft and added Horford, got to the second round of the playoffs last year and resigned Boom to make a final push this coming season.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol stalkin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jul 23, 2008 11:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
was never going to happen
didn’ t happen get over it
by hawk0924 on
Jul 24, 2008 12:20 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Bad decision is still bad decision, "hypothesis" or not
There’s no guarantee the other way either; he could easily have stayed healthy (as he did in Charlotte), and both him and Ellis were starters and could have remained starters together.
by J-Triumf on
Jul 24, 2008 8:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks
Finally somone who can understands what a GM has to deal with. Mullin is a good GM, not the best, but he has done good with what he has had in front of him. This post came from the heart and I thoroughly enjoyed reading this.
by Knowshon Ciron on Jul 23, 2008 10:20 AM PDT 0 recs
Eh... I agree
I like this current team’s potential. Its a whole lot better than the team that he took on and light years away from our teams in the mid-late 90’s. Seriously… how could you argue w/ that?
by Mr. Monday Night on Jul 23, 2008 10:29 AM PDT 0 recs
I stand by Mullin
I don’t agree with some of his moves, but i still think he is doing a good job. Being a Gm is hard work and trying to make a team better is exactly what he is doing. I mean what would you have done? Sign baron and have the exact same team as last year. Come on, im excited about this season, about our depth and players that I want to see. Im a Baron fan and i was really sad when he left, but im not going to start complaining about how Mullin is being a bad gm, naww far from it. Mullin keep up the good work and i think the warriors are going to be a fun team to watch next year.
by pat52willis on Jul 23, 2008 11:06 AM PDT 0 recs
Mullin as GM
So far I think Mullin has done very well as GM. He made some mistakes early and I think those were “Rookie GM” mistakes. He gave his existing players big contract extensions that they may have not deserved (Foyle, Murphy, Dunleavy, Richardson). I think these were emotional decisions on his part. He liked his guys and wanted to keep them around. I was always a Derek Fisher fan so I liked signing him but I still thought he got a bit more than he was worth.
Mullin then corrected his mistakes and dumped those bad contracts for some players that other teams would have quickly passed over. He grabbed up Baron Davis for Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis which is probably one of the most lopsided trades in Warriors history and was clearly the best move Mullin has made as GM. He also gets rid of Dunleavy’s and Murphy’s contracts and gets Al Harrington and Stephen Jackson. This is the move that puts the Warriors over the top and into the playoffs along with getting Don Nelson back to coach the team.
Dealing away Jason Richardson is probably the biggest mistake he has made so far and I think he knows it but I can understand why he did it. Richardson’s pay could be construed as being a bit more than what his play was worth but in my opinion he was worth it. At the time, everyone knew that Kevin Garnett wanted out of Minnesota and I think Mullin was trying to make room to fit him in. The Warriors had a developing star in Monta so Richardson becomes somewhat expendable in many people’s eyes. Mullin then trades Richardson away for a kid with potential in Wright. Minnesota asks for too much to get Kevin Garnett and ends up going to the Celtics. So the Warriors lose Richardson and don’t get Kevin Garnett. This is probably the worst case scenario that could have happened when Mullin made that trade. But the one bright side is Wright has potential but we never really get to see that because Nelson won’t play him. This probably the biggest mistake that Mullin has made. He should have had the a deal to trade for Garnett on the table that worked for both teams before shipping off Richardson. WIthout Richardson, the Warriors don’t make the playoffs. Had Richardson stayed, I think the Warriors would have made that 8th spot last season. (I’m a little biased here because I am was and will always be a big Jason Richardson fan. I loved watching him play for the Warriors and was very sad to see him get traded. He definitely was the heart and soul of the Warriors while he was here.)
Now we come to this current offseason. Baron Davis opts out of his contract and shocks the Warriors by passing up on $17.8 million. The Warriors didn’t make much effort to sign Baron to the long term contract that he wanted and why should they have. Baron played all 82 games but to say that he is suddenly an iron man is ridiculous. I honestly think that we saw Baron’s best year last year. His age and injuries will catch up to him and he won’t be the player that he was. He didn’t get a huge offer from the Clippers and even if the Warriors offered him the same contract, he wouldn’t have taken it. It became pretty clear to me that he wanted to go back home to L.A.. In the long run, it was a good decision to let him go.
Signing Turiaf is a no-brainer. The Warriors had been one of, if not the worst, rebounding and defensive teams in the league. Getting a guy like Turiaf gives the Warriors just what they need the most. I think we might have overpaid for him a little bit but we needed to make our quota of crazy French guys now that Pietrus is in Orlando saying hi to Mickey Mouse.
Maggette is probably the one signing that I have the biggest problem with and I think this is Mullin’s way of trying to replace Jason Richardson. If Maggette can bring the same attitude and passion to the court that Jason Richardson did, I am all for it. If he plays like he did for the Clippers, I don’t know. We did over pay for him but we had to in order to lure him away from teams with championship potential like the Spurs. There is little to no chance of the Warriors winning a title in the next few years so they would have to throw some serious cash his way to lure him in.
The last couple of moves, I like. At first, I didn’t like getting Marcus Williams. I thought giving up a conditional first round pick was a little much. I would have been happy if we just offered a second round pick but I’m just being a cheapskate. We’ll see if he is worth it. Maurice Evans should be a great addition. I have liked watching this guy in Detroit and L.A. and most recently with the Magic. He should be as good or better than Pietrus and comes at a lower price tag. Why the Magic chose to pick up Pietrus over Evans is a mystery to me. Evans seems to be more mature and consistent.
What does Mullin have left? Kelenna Azubuike can still be signed if they match the Clippers offer. I don’t think it’s going to happen by Friday. I think Mullin is will be looking at some of the sign and trade possibilities out there before trying to re-sign any of his young players. I will really miss seeing Kelenna playing for the Warriors but he is getting the payday that he deserves. As long as Andris and Monta aren’t signed yet, there is still going to be some maneuvering going on especially with all the trade rumors that I am sure we are all hearing. We’ll see what kind of team we have by the start of the season and again after the trade deadline. But so far, I think Mullin has done a very good job.
Considering that there is still a lot of work to be done and recent moves have yet to make their mark, I give Mullin a B+. He’ll get an A if the Warriors make the playoffs this season.
by NBA on Jul 23, 2008 11:47 AM PDT 0 recs
I give Mullin a B+.
You wrote a very well thoughtful summary of the situation. I agree with everything you said but I’m not as forgiving of the Jrich trade so I’d only give mullin a C . Getting Boom was an A move and losing Jason was an F so C is the average.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol stalkin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jul 23, 2008 2:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm not a fan of losing Richardson
Trading away Richardson was a bad move and I don’t think anyone will argue that much other than he had a big contract that the Warriors were able to dump. But had Mulling managed to get Kevin Garnett, we would all be saying something completely different. Kevin Garnett, Baron Davis, Stephen Jackson, Al Harrington would have made a pretty good core to build off of. Given that the intention behind trading Jason Richardson was to make a good team into a championship team, I am willing to give Mullin a little bit of a break.
by NBA on
Jul 23, 2008 3:05 PM PDT
up
0 recs
losing jason was not an F
we finished six games better without him
"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006
by flipgatey3 on
Jul 23, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Revisionsim works both ways
yours is tinted through rose colored glasses
simply mentioning the several repeated bad signings (Dun, Murph, Foyle) which put this franchise in a deep hole for several years is not a small matter to be as easily dismissed as learning from one of those mistakes
DFish was a bad signing – he was overpaid and we had to virtually give him away so as to unload another bad contract of Mullin’s creation
Baron did not choose to come here, he was traded here and was as much a problem here under Montgomery as he was before – up until Nelson got here Baron was an albatross who, like the above mentioned players was untradable the month prior to Nelson’s arrival.
The Indy trade was not genius, it was desperation on the part of two clubs and there’s plenty of evidence on both sides of that trade in the season and half since it was made.
You’re correct about Nelson – Mullin’s turning point WAS when he convinced Nelson to return, as it was Nelson who got the most out of Baron, Jax, Al, Ellis, Barnes & Andris. Nelson was also the one who helped Mullin mitigate the anchor which was Foyle’s contract and which still drags us down today. Credit goes to NELSON and rightly so. Mullin’s pre-Nelson moves are overwhelmingly harmful to the franchise while the progress that has been made is after Nelson arrived. Yes Mullin drafted AB & Ellis, but they were not utilized nor maximized under Montgomery (Mullin’s hire). The POB/Kosta draft could still go down as one of the worst 1-2 picks in NBA history,
- then Nelson was brought on board.
The JRich trade cannot be evaluated without appraising the cap ramifications and the potential of Wright. However, had Mullin not put us into the cap hell-hole he had prior to Nelson’s arrival, he might not have felt compelled to unload a starter on a playoff team for a player yet to make a contribution still. And that doesn’t even address the possible KG connection … Also in that draft are Marco and Lasme, making two pretty poor drafts when measured in productivity on the floor. Wright’s potential is the only redeeming quality from those picks. And Marco is Mullin’s boy – the special player he’d been watching for years (so he said, not me) and who was going to pay immediate dividends (Mullin’s claim)
I AGREE that Baron wanted out and that he’d have not been a good long-term investment, but you ignore that Mullin (a) was surprised – such that had he had a better understanding of his own team he might have attempted a trade earlier, or a S&T so as not to be left with nothing after Baron bolted (b) Mullin panicked – absolutely – with the Arenas offer which, had it been accepted would have left us without the ability to resign Monta and Andris. I believe his strategy was to re-sign Monta if Brand accepted, or resign Andris if Arenas accepted but that’s pure speculation on my part. The point is Mullin lacked the acumen to have an accurate read of his own team – potentially that will become fatal. Baron, Brand, Arenas, and Maggette all played the off-season “game” better than Mullin did. As much as I like the signing of Maggette, we paid more because of the position Mullin allowed us to get into.
You are RIGHT that this year’s team has more depth, and you correctly point out that many on this board overvalue our own role players (ala Barnes) and that’s a product of familiarity (we also undervalue guys like MP because we can’t forgive them for not making the big FTs vs Utah or stepping out of bounds). Like you I like the additions of Maggette and Turiaf (in fact had suggested both previously on this board). Both are going to meet important needs on this roster and I applaud those signings. But we had to overpay for both (perhaps not as much as some have claimed). That is a partial result of the state of the franchise, and that is Mullin’s responsibility. You wrote “Brand wanted to be in the east where he has a shot for a title – is this Mullin’s fault?” Yes, that is Mullin’s fault. He’s had years to build a roster that would be complete with Brand, hell if we had Baron here maybe Brand would have thought twice. Had he not made several (not just one or two) of the previous mistakes we may have grown out of the stage where we have to overpay for FA, trade for disgruntled stars, and hope we hit HRs in the draft. And maybe, a Brand player would actually want to come play here under the most fun style in the NBA …
We are facing – in your own estimation – two more seasons of sub .500 production. Is that the sign of a good GM? Do you think Portland is thinking that? Where and when did their GM start visa vie Mullin? Subtract Oden (who hasn’t played) and that roster is brimming.
We are also facing the end of Nelson II – and Mullin needs to make a good hire on the next coach. Are you confident of that?
I’ve been a fan since Nate Thurmond and Steve Johnson patrolled the paint, Jamal Wilkes cranked back his silky shot, & enjoyed Sleepy Floyd, World B., and all the rest. Not all of Mullin’s critics are bandwagoners or wet behind the ears. Some of us have even been around the game awhile in a professional capacity. Suffice to say that our definition of a decent GM differs from yours. While Mullin may not be as bad as some of GS other examples of managerial ineptitude, that doesn’t make him better than what he’s produced.
This off season isn’t over, Mullin can continue to improve our club and we all hope he can. That doesn’t mean he gets a pass on all his past mistakes & the ramifications we still live with. A true fan isn’t one who glosses over the bad and only focuses on the good – a truly passionate fan enjoys and understands the game, and the games within the game. That includes roster management. I guarantee you NY & Philly fans know that.
by hardcore on Jul 23, 2008 2:48 PM PDT 0 recs
+1
You said everything I wanted to.
We’re not being disloyal fans here. This is what good fans do. They offer criticism, because like all other fans out there, they want their team to be continuously improving.
by kinetic on
Jul 23, 2008 3:46 PM PDT
up
0 recs
To criticize Mullin is to be a reasonable fan… totally agree with you on that. Mullin isn’t an elite GM, by any means, and his bad moves deserve no small amount of criticism. He was quite a bad GM early on. But I think you’re underrating how effectively he’s guided the team for the past two seasons.
Mullin’s overall draft record is poor, but the idea that Nellie, not Mullin, gets credit for the blossoming of Biedrins and Ellis is crazy. They didn’t play much under Montgomery because they were both incredibly young and incredibly raw… they’ve developed on the timeline that one would expect. If anything, I’d say Nellie has been slightly detrimental to the development of Biedrins, as Nellie just doesn’t seem committed to giving the guy the minutes he deserves.
I agree that POB was a horrible pick and that Marco was probably a bad one. Hell, I’m more bearish on Randolph than most here… I don’t think much of Mullin’s draft record. But Biedrins and Monta are two big, positive data points on his resume. Getting Azubuike out of the D-League should probably be another one, as Mullin was the one who scouted him (the Moncrief connection helped, but still, we landed the guy).
(I also have trouble getting worked up over bad second-round selections—in my opinion, there’s no such thing. Signing Kosta for that amount of money was silly, but in the scheme of things, a two-year, $3 million dollar deal doesn’t make much of a difference either way. There are failed big men making several times that amount on other NBA rosters.)
It’s easy to use Portland as a counterexample to us, and I agree that Pritchard is a significantly better GM than Mullin. But the fact that Paul Allen has given Pritchard completely free financial reign to is relevant. Pritchard can buy all the picks he wants and spend all the money that NBA rules allow… Mullin can’t. Portland’s wild surplus of assets is as much due to the generosity of their owner as to the cleverness of their GM.
There will probably never be consensus on this point, but I think the J-Rich trade was a good one in any context. Let’s not forget: our team improved by six games without him, while the Bobcats got a game worse with him. Mullin was also EXTREMELY disciplined about not overpaying to keep Barnes and Pietrus last summer. After our exciting run, it’d have been tempting to overreward the role players that helped us get there… many, many GMs would do that. Mullin didn’t. Those are non-moves for which I think he deserves a little credit.
I agree that Mullin handled this year’s big FA hunt clumsily. I have no beef with selling the farm for Brand, but Arenas is a different story. I think Maggette’s a good fit for us, though as you say, we overpaid a bit. I frankly don’t know what to make of all the Baron histrionics, but I don’t think it’s a disaster that he’s gone.
I do like the smaller moves from this summer. The acquisitions of Turiaf and Marcus Williams were well-handled, (IMO) well-priced and balance our roster out nicely. For sentimental reasons I’d rather keep Buike than add Maurice Evans, but either would be a solid contributor at a solid price. We have added real depth without breaking the bank.
What we now have is an extremely young, high-upside, deep team that will probably cost less than the luxury tax, and that, in Harrington, has an extra rapidly appreciating trade chip to boot. There are question marks, to be sure: the Monta-as-PG experiment could well end badly, we may have leadership questions (though it seems to me that Jack has been the emotional leader of the team, not Baron), and we are, as always, a great big man short. It’s reasonable to criticize Mullin for those shortcomings. But it’s also reasonable to praise him for a roster whose future, all things considered, looks bright.
I became a Warriors fan by jumping on the bandwagon… in the summer of 1994. The ‘07 playoffs are the only postseason I’ve sniffed as a fan of this team—overall, it’s been a brutal, demoralizing fourteen years, as I obviously don’t have to tell you. Mullin was responsible for a couple of those dark years, and I haven’t forgotten that. Any longtime Warriors fan is no stranger to dissatisfaction.
But I like the look of this team. It’s not because I’m blind, or a sheep, or a Mullin-lover… it’s because, to my objective-as-possible eyes, it actually looks like a promising roster. Mullin put this roster together. I wouldn’t call his overall tenure a success, but I like what he’s done here lately, and I’m not going to deny him credit for it because he overpaid a bunch of guys four years ago.
by onlxn on
Jul 23, 2008 4:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
call me crazy ;)
scattershot reply – follow train of thought as I try to get out of dodge: agree that most early decisions were poor, and most recent decisions have been better – just imo the fulcrum for the change was Nelson’s return ... about getting worked up about 2nd rounders – agreed, but every Mullin apologist points to Monta’s pick as the holy grail, my point is you can’t have it both ways where he gets hailed for one and a pass on all the rest … Cohan hasn’t given le$$ than Allen has – too easy to point to Cohan, but he’s the one who ate Montgomery’s contract and kept Mullin on even after all the bad signings … agreed the discipline last summer was a welcome change from earlier re-signings (again, Nelson? or just learning the ropes? both??) – we’re agreeing more than disagreeing and everyone hopes when the dust settles we can win a ton of games, Nelson gets his record & sails off into the sunset, and Mullin hires a HOF coach to take us to the land of milk and honey …
by hardcore on
Jul 23, 2008 5:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Monta ain't the only one
Biedrins (best center we’ve had since, ummm?)
Wright and Randolph are both good picks.
Wright will be very good and Randolph may be an all star.
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on
Jul 23, 2008 5:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
follow train of thought
comment re picks was only re 2nd rounders in reply
jury is waaaaaay out on the BW, AR yet – hope you’re right
nice reply below btw …
by hardcore on
Jul 23, 2008 5:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
i see your points but...
You simplify mine. I’m not saying he should get a pass for bad mistakes early on – I’m saying that I like the fact that he learned from those mistakes and made better ones down the road show he is improving as a GM and I would now rank him as a pretty good one. Not many walk into a new job being great at it.
YES, Baron was traded here – but look what we gave up! That was great for us! When did we have a GM make such a great trade in the 14 year playoff drought? Also, Baron and Montgomery not making magic together was more Monts fault than anyone else – he was out of his league here and Baron knew it.
Also, you mentioned portland which I think is a good example of what we are trying to do. Now, when was the last time Portland made the playoffs? Hard to recall, no? They seem to have been rebuilt by adding depth and letting young guys like Roy develop. Sounds similar to us. But despite not making the playoffs for years we like what we see them doing and praise their GM on this site. Also, they happened to hit the Oden sweepstakes – they don’t get credit for being lucky.
Honestly, I think unless you have a superstar you can build around the best strategy seems to be having depth and skill at every position and great coach who can get everyone on the same page playing a “brand” of basktball better than everyone else. Dumars did that in detroit and they play team defense better than the rest and got some rings. Now, Mullin is following that model (and Portlands) and hoping we can outscore the league with Nellie ball. Of course, I don’t want two seasons with no playoffs but if it is funto watch and clearly heading towards getting better (what Blazer fans have enjoyed) then I’ll appreciate the GM. If we make the playoffs next year – I wouldn’t be shocked either.
Saying Mullin is to blame for Elton wanting to go to a weaker division is silly. The west being so loaded with great teams compared to the eastern divsion has nothing to do with Mullin. The fact that Elton is from the east and wanted to get back east has nothing to do with Mullin. Even if we had Baron, Brand and Monta – the west is still really tough to go the distance. Your scenario of him making better choices in the earliest days and getting lucky with draft picks is filled with “ifs” – plus, if he had made better choices early on then EVERYTHING would be different – probable no Baron or Nellie. To many variables in that scenario you layed out.
As for JRich – and I love the guy – he peaked in my book. The jury is still out on both Marco and Wright so I don’t think we can judge this yet. But if we get some of the intangibles from other players that JRich gave us and Wright brings us a talent and skill and potential that we have no place else on the team – isn’t it a good move?
Not all draft moves were good – I agree – but Monta was a diamond in the rough and to me that cancels out the POB and Kostas. Honestly, the draft is such a crap shoot that the margin of error should be that for every great player you pick two decent guys and three crappy ones. That seems to be the norm for most teams – in this regard we are doing pretty well.
Mullin has stated the he never really expected Arenas or Brand to accept what many see on this site as desperation moves. Did anyone really believe they would agree to come here? Especially since Arenas wants to stay with Jamison and Brand wants to go east. I saw those moves by Mullin as just being active – keeping the warriors in the conversations – pure hype.
you say: “The Indy trade was not genius, it was desperation on the part of two clubs and there’s plenty of evidence on both sides of that trade in the season and half since it was made.”
This, I really disagree with. If you recall Sjax was seen as public enemy number one (ok – 2, after Ron artest) at the time so signing him was a risk. Also, when you consider the RESULT of the move – not just the quality of playing – it led to a COMPLETE reversal in how we played and howwe were seen by the league. Jax, Baron and Al changed the cuture of the franchise and Mullin signed – good enough for me.
In the end, the GMs job is to put the team to together and during Mullin’s reign he has put together a better team than we’ve had since run tmc. Hopefully this new group will also be very good. I agree Nelson gets credit as well, but I think they work as a team and so giving credit to one should include the other.
I noted concrens I had about choices he made – so it isn’t all rose colored glasses. I’d give him a B. Also, I am not questioning people’s love for the team or anything, I just think we are way to quick to slam the guys we sign and Mullin for signing them without giving them a chance. Your points are far more thought out than the sort of critiques I am sick of – see the one below – but I guess my analysis of Mullin is less harsh than yours because I have so enjoyed the team the last couple years and m excited to see who they will be next. Ths excitement hasn’t existed for me towards the dubs in many years.
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on
Jul 23, 2008 5:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
the above post is geared towards hardcore's reply
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on
Jul 23, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
call me silly
others call me worse ;)
seriously, my apologies – I hate it when people simplify my points too
Ok, here I stand: Mullin’s decisions on the whole wounded this franchise more deeply than they helped until Nelson returned, and we’ve been digging out ever since (and still are) from the early mistakes, but we are making head way. But to where? Up until we lost Baron we were on the fence as far as a direction. Now it should be obvious.
For what it’s worth I think we should now be in full rebuild mode, yet as a fan I wanted to make the playoffs. Yup, Contradictory. Let me explain. I can forgive not making the playoffs if we have a rational direction to develop our players, and I can also forgive going for the playoffs and not developing players (like not playing BW much last year) as long as there’s a direction.
What I can’t stand is not having leadership from above setting the direction and executing the plan. If our plan was to go for playoffs and not risk that to develop BW then why not use the TPE and get another weapon either last summer or during the season since it would NOT have impacted us until this summer? At which point we would make a move to reload. Yes, we would have had to made a decision on a trade or RFA, but we would have more than likely made the playoffs and been in position to ADD to a veteran to a playoff core. That opportunity is past.
Now, your strategy is exactly the strategy that could produce a roster that a Brand type player would be ready to enter in the future, problem is for all the years Mullin has been here (how many now?) he has yet to create that balanced roster ready to take advantage of a great FA, pick, trade, etc. that would put us over the top. Baron was a prime example of being ready and willing to gamble on big talent, and he and Nelson were a good pair. Good pick up by Mullin, but only after he paired the two did it pay off, and in the summer of 06 he’d tried in vain to trade half that roster before turning to Nelson.
Re the Indy trade – both franchises were desperate was what I was trying to convey = marriage of convenience. Indy desperately wanted to rid themselves of Jax and Harrington was the cost, while we desperately wanted to rid ourselves of Murph & Dun and at the time Diogu was the cost. Yes the trade was a risk – i wrote then that it was an act of desperation and that Mullin and Nelson both might get held accountable if it blew up in our faces. It didn’t. But Indy is probably still happy with that trade, so “good marriage” so to speak …
We were closest a year ago when Garnett became available – if we were really in go-for-it mode we could have put both Andris and Monta on the table. Blasphemy? Radical? ya, but it’s also rational if you follow your plan. We could’ve have had Baron, Jax, and Garnett plus whoever was left over. And ya, Minn. might not have said yes …. anyway, all the way into last season we should have been in go-for-it-now mode, but we held back – for example we let the TPE expire, it went unused both at the trade deadline and as the draft approached. We re-signed CWebb instead. That to me is a sign we were waffling between trying to compete and trying to develop – afraid to add a non-expiring contract, and probably one of many signs Baron noticed too. Would he have stayed if we’d added a player and made the playoffs? Who knows, depends upon who we picked up and what his extension might have been. Now, we are starting over again. How many years?
I like signings this summer overall, and am glad one did NOT happen as Mully hoped – but they all seem reactionary to me, not part of a plan. I worry about the aborted Arenas signing because it was a desperate move, one that might have cost us BOTH Andris and Monta (thinking about luxury tax territory here). That doesn’t seem rational, would you trade them straight up for Arenas? and throw in Maggette?! – if we’d signed Arenas, that’s it. No Turiaf, Maggette, Williams, etc. That one decision could have set us pretty far back. So based upon that move, I have to wonder if Mullin really has learned from all those early foibles …
by hardcore on
Jul 23, 2008 6:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I hear you
I chose to “misremeber” the whole webber thing – manoman -that was bad.
Again, I think the move for arenas wasn’t realistic – and Mullin knew that – same with Brand.
You give a lot of credit to Nelson – as he deserves – but Mullin brought him. So, if we think of a GM as I guy who brings in the people who make the train goes – this was the best move for a coach since the last time Nellie was hired – right? How is this harming the franchise?
The TPE expiring pissed me off too – but I think Cohan is to blame for that.
You said “up until we lost Baron we were on the fence” – I disagree – just two years ago we upset Dallas. This last year has been a disappointment because we never really built on that “direction” Mullin and others help create. For this I blame Mullin for not having a deep enough bench, Nelson for not resting his stars, and the players for slipping (barnes, pietrus, harrington). I think Mullin felt that this squad, if they produced like they did in the playoffs and Monta, Beans and maybe Wright improved and got in the mix big time we could be like the Suns. That to me was a direction. This past season may have led to more wins but was a step back.
On the KG thing – I’m happy we made an effort to get him. But I don’t solely blame Mullin for not succeeding. If I’m KG and could join Pierce and Ray in the weak east I would do it too.
Overall, I think Mullin has done more to help the team than hurt it – so we disagree there – but I think we would both agree that unless this current squad can really be good in the next couple years – Mullin will be out of a job.
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on
Jul 23, 2008 7:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think Mullin felt that this squad, if they produced like they did in the playoffs and Monta, Beans and maybe Wright improved and got in the mix big time we could be like the Suns.
He shoulda watched the playoffs tapes then. If so he’da seen JRich ballin on the court and Montay bawling under a towel.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol stalkin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jul 23, 2008 11:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
dude
i don’t want to be a dick, but can you please stop spelling monta incorrectly? i’m not the only one who’s posted about it. it’s just careless.
"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006
by flipgatey3 on
Jul 23, 2008 11:34 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mullin is a BAD GM
Mullin is a bad GM. In sports your merrit is measured by results and that’s it. A great GM makes the playoffs 8/10yrs a good GM makes the playoffs 6/10yrs average maybe 4/10yrs bad 2/10 yrs, true there are a lot of bad GMs and Mullin is one he has made the playoffs 1/5yrs. This is professional sports where only wining matters you get no points for effort!
by sleepyfan on Jul 23, 2008 3:58 PM PDT 0 recs
what???
GMs don’t make playoffs – players do. Give me Lebron or Kobe and I can GM them to the playoffs – however that works.
Also, does this mean Portland’sGM is bad? Seems like he is doing a great job. Does this mean the Cavalier’s G is great – I think they do well in spite of front office inepitude.
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on
Jul 23, 2008 5:12 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Blazers GM been GM for less than 2 years
In his two years he traded away bad contract Z-Bo, drafted LMA + Roy + Bayless + Rudy Fernandez + Batum + Lucky Oden.
In two years he completely changed the entire roster, except for Travis Outlaw and Martell Webster.
Yeah, in those two years we haven’t made the playoffs, but won 32 games Roy’s rookie year and 41 this recent season. I expect us to make the playoffs in year 3 of Pritchard’s reign as GM.
That’s a quick turnaround. He hasn’t been GM long, and all of the ‘good’ moves have been recent.
You are 100% right that having money bags Paul Allen helps a TON, and that’s how we got dudes like Rudy Fernandez. The trades and other lottery picks were done with good work, however.
Best way to improve long term is the lottery, hands down. That’s been a huge weakness for the Warriors, for whatever reason. It might not be totally Mullin, but he’s the dude in charge.
The Cavs GM is considered bad, I’d say. Everyone knows it’s all Lebron there and they haven’t surrounded him with anyone. Unfortunately for them, they’ll lose him in 2010. :-(
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Jul 23, 2008 5:25 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mullin has been about what I’d expect for throwing darts at the wall. He’s improved the team, but then again, anything short of incompetence would improve the team. From random chance they’d do better than they’d done in the past. His drafts have on average been no better nor worse than you’d expect by random chance. Some good picks, some horrendous ones. I don’t really forgive the horrendous POB pick because it was clearly idiotic at the time. Missing on a guy taken later? Happens. Having a guy not pan out for some unforeseen reason? Sure. But taking a guy entirely for need when there’s next to zero chance he’ll ever meet that need? Stupid.
Mullin gave out bad contracts early on, but salvaged that for the most part, getting something out of nothing by dealing away the bad back end of the deals.
But I fear that he may be swinging back away from his overpay dumb into a stingy dumb. I fear he’s fearful of making another Foyle signing, so instead he’s making it difficult to retain guys who can actually pay. Time will tell on this one.
He made a nice move in getting Nellie to come back. If that was his doing, he’s got a pass on the other mistakes.
Overall, I don’t see him as being better than your average replacement GM. The problem the Warriors have had is that they haven’t had that for most of the last 2 decades. In comparison, he’s a standout. IN absolute terms? Eh.
by jae on Jul 23, 2008 5:08 PM PDT 0 recs
The way I see it
Does ANYONE here think Chris Mullin would actually be a GM anywhere, let alone for the Warriors, if he wasn’t a star NBA player?
I doubt he really truly earned his position through his hard work in the front office, and he has often seem overmatched and while striking 2nd round gold with Monta, he has REPEATEDLY made bad, even HORRIBLE picks in the lottery. I think Anthony Randolph might turn this around, but it’s about damn time.
Aside from Jerry West, is there any ex-star-player who has done well recently as a GM?
Buttafingas, the Blazers made the playoffs last in 2003, after 20+ years in a row. The subsequent 3 years they were awful, and had awful management that wasn’t going to get any better. In a way, being so bad helped the Blazers because it allowed a young, smart guy like Kevin Pritchard to come in and take over. Since KP took over for the 2006 draft and finally became the official GM in 2007, it has been a very quick turnaround.
The Portland way of rebuilding only works if you got good management, and good management drafts well and keeps the right players happy.
Now, I don’t think the Warriors were ever gonna win with Baron, so I don’t mind you losing him, but you could have gotten SOMETHING for him. I like the Warriors rebuilding, as the previous team was fun but wasn’t likely to do anything in the postseason. If that’s good enough after a long playoff drought, I understand, but you guys probably want more.
If you truly want to rebuild, signing Maggette is an extremely odd choice, since it’s a long, expensive contract for a player who is about 30 and relies on his athleticism to play, and you have plenty of veterans AND youth who play the same position.
I get that you love Chris Mullin the player, but has he done anything post-NBA career that warrants the honor of running a NBA team as a GM? If I was a hardcore Dubs fan, I’d rather get someone who earned the position through hard work and not star power.
The Baron thing really hurts, but it might be the best thing to happen to the Warriors in years because it set you up to be pretty bad, and then you can get a REAL superstar in the draft. Signing Maggette might throw a wrench in that plan, and not make you good enough still to make the playoffs.
Sideways moves don’t help when you’re trying to rebuild into a contender.
I am constantly confused by what Chris Mullin is doing. I had hopes he figured it out more when he traded away all of his bad signings (Dunleavy, Murphy, Fisher), but it doesn’t seem like much has changed.
I dunno man… if he wasn’t Chris Mullin the star of the Warriors, I doubt he’s good enough to be a GM anywhere.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jul 23, 2008 5:20 PM PDT 0 recs
+10000000000000000
EXACTLY! I don’t mind losing Baron, but signing Maggette just negated most of the benefits that came from getting out of his contract and getting an early start on building for the future. Mullin just looks like he doesn’t have a real plan, which is the biggest problem I have.
And Pritchard is the Billy Beane of basketball. Every NBA team is going to have to follow the Blazers game plan to remain competitive in the next few years.
by kinetic on
Jul 23, 2008 5:28 PM PDT
up
0 recs
We are not the lakers or celtics, we have to pay more for talent, thats just the way it is...
get used to it until we are championship contenders, fans buy more merchandise, local companies sign bigger endorsements or we pay more for the talent than most others, we need to keep our young talent like buikeand Monta, and develop Randolph and Wright, Beans and Hendrix, Then and only Then will we be able to pay market for talent…
by warriorbum on Jul 23, 2008 6:25 PM PDT 0 recs
that's not really the case...
you make it sound like the warriors are the bobcats or the hawks. as it stands, the warriors have one of the biggest markets in the NBA. It’s not a good excuse.
and it looks like they’re not going to keep buike.
by kinetic on
Jul 23, 2008 6:55 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Here’s my problem. I defended Mullin up to before this offseason because I felt that he had made terrible moves early in his days but then learned and became a damn good GM. Then, I thought he knew he was clearly in rebuilding mode when Baron opted out. So when he overpaid for Maggette I really had no explanation. It seems to me he does not subscribe to the 1 step back, 2 steps forward approach, though everything building up to that signing suggested he did. So I still don’t understand that one. I hope we keep Buike though. At the current price we should. I hope Mullin is waiting the full 7 days to discourage teams from going after him.
Personally I think he is a damn good drafter. I still think Diogu is the most underused player in the league. Patrick O’Bryant was a mistake, but only because we had no use for him. The Celtics might. Other than that I see no mistakes. No 2nd round pick can be a mistake, only a plus, and he has a few pluses in that department. And Biedrins turned out good, as well as Pietrus. Jury’s still out on the new guys.
by belilaugh on Jul 23, 2008 9:04 PM PDT 0 recs
Chris Mullin deserves neither fanatic love nor angry hate
I’ve said this before in a previous topic, but I’ll reiterate again: Mullin’s tenure has been quite a rollercoaster ride. For every good/stupid move or two he’s done, he’s followed it up with opposite ones. The good stuff he’s done have been acquiring Baron Davis for practically nothing, locking J-Rich to a long-term deal, finding Monta Ellis late in the draft, replacing Dunleavy and Murphy with Jackson and Harrington, and replacing Mike Montgomery with Don Nelson—in contrast, his dumb moves include favoring Foyle over Dampier, wasting money on Dunleavy and Derek Fisher, hiring Mike Montgomery in the first place, dumping a reliable scorer/leader (J-Rich) for an unproven rookie (Wright), and not being bold enough to nab significant stars such as Kevin Garnett.
In short, Mullin does stuff that has some people singing his praises one moment, and other people calling for his blood the next. Put it all together and you have someone who is neither great nor terrible, but overall serviceable.
by J-Triumf on Jul 23, 2008 9:29 PM PDT 0 recs
I'm not saying he's horrible...
I’m just saying some people are a little less than objective, and think this team is gonna make the playoffs next year.
by kinetic on
Jul 23, 2008 10:23 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The same can be said about people thinking this team will NOT make the playoffs
Obviously the roster became vastly different over the short course of this past month, but all things considered, it’s foolish to think that either outcome is guaranteed. The only thing that any of us can be assured of is that this upcoming season will be a mystery; people simply fear the unknown.
by J-Triumf on
Jul 23, 2008 11:21 PM PDT
up
0 recs
it's funny
because earlier in the thread, you said that they would have made the playoffs last year with richardson, but there is no way of knowing if that is true…
...however, the optimist in me agrees with your post here.
"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006
by flipgatey3 on
Jul 23, 2008 11:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Like Ellis being doubted as a PG, it's a matter of not getting a fair chance to prove themselves
Well, think about it: keep the ‘07 playoff team intact, with everyone having gained experience and the team itself becoming recognized as a more serious force to handle. With Jackson having been (unfairly) suspended at the beginning, Richardson’s experience and consistency would have definitely made up for such an absence, just as well as he would have been very useful towards the end of the season where we all saw Davis slowly run out of gas. Easily another 5 or 6 wins for us at least, and with the conference playoff race becoming what it was, another Warriors playoff appearance would have been MUCH more likely. Hindsight is 20/20.
My “no guarantee” talk mainly revolves around the current post-Davis lineup, which does not have enough of a past reputation to really draw solid information from; I only know that Ellis is a young guy who has continually improved over the years and will most likely keep that trend going, so I see any potential setback being offset by that. The ‘07 team, however, showed the whole world what they were capable of when everyone was present and accounted for, and it’s really sad how we’ll never get to see how things would have turned out had everyone stayed put.
by J-Triumf on
Jul 24, 2008 12:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs





