Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NBA Power Rankings for Week 2

Grading Mullin - The Warriors Off-Season

This off-season is probably the most important off-season for Chris Mullin and our Dubs. The last time Mullin had an off-season like this he signed Foyle and Fisher to horrible deals to build around franchise cornerstones: Jason Richardson, Troy Murphy, and Mike Dunleavy. We all know how that turned out.... outside of Jason Richardson all of those moves have turned out to be big, fat, F.

So let's look at the moves Mullin has made this off-season:

1) Not re-signing Baron Davis

I don't know about you, but during our playoff push last year I began to wish Nelson didn't give BD so much leeway. With each 3 pointer he chucked, instead of taking it to the rack and his matador defense trying to go for pokes... I began to hate him. The one sequence that sticks in my head is against the Nuggets in a do or die game for the final playoff spot... sometime in the late 3rd/early 4th the Warriors down by 4 points or so had 3 defensive stops in a row... sadly the defense went for nothing as BD launched 3 pointers instead of working for a better shot. After that time I knew that we got the best out of BD the year before... the unstoppable bowling ball during the last month of the season and in the playoffs.

Next season our win total maybe lower, but that extra year of experience without BD will do wonders for Ellis, Biedrins, and the rest of the young guys as they learn to win in the NBA and gain experience a steh go-to guys... this could lead to more wins in the future.

GRADE: B .. Next season we will suffer, but it will pay off in the future.

2) Offering Brand and GA Max contracts

These were genius moves by Mullin. Had he landed either player the Warriors would've been a lock for playoffs IMO.. with that said and as much as it hurts to say this as Gilbert Arenas is my favorite player... Brand would've been a much better fit for the Warriors. I'd much rather pay 100 million for a stud big man who can do it all than perimeter oriented scorer (as clutch as GA is).

GRADE: Brand (A) - Well worth the shot and would actually IMPROVE the team. Arenas (C) - The Warriors would be no better than a 48 win team and potentially worse with GA at point over BD. Plus he plays the same position as Ellis and you have yourself a team that has tied up it's capspace for status quo. You don't committ 100 million to 1 player for status quo.

Average: B .. Well worth the shot.

3) Signing Corey Maggette 5yrs/50 million

Corey is a good player and a I'm glad he'll be abusing opposing teams instead of abusing us. Two things I love about Maggs is: (1) He makes FTs (2) He will not be denied to the rim. This is what the Warriors were lacking last year... someone who wouldn't settle for jumpshots and is confident in their FT shooting. Two things I hate about Maggs: (1) He is not a playmaker (2) He will not be denied to the rim. What this means is Maggette is BALL HOG CITY!! I just hope that was all due to the Clippers being depleted and him being in a contract year, but Maggs is a black hole. He can kill an entire offense for stretches since he rarely gives up the rock. If this Warrior team is to succeed they will need to share the rock.

While he has more positives than negatives.. paying Maggs 10 million a year is A LOT when the most he was looking at was mid-level exceptions.

GRADE: C ... Sign Maggs for 5 years/40-42 million and this becomes a B instead.

3) Signing Ronny Turiaf 4/17 million

This was a solid signing by Mullin providing the Warriors our own Milsap/Power. again like Maggette this was a guy who would tear us up. Glad he's with us now. He can run, block shots, play some defense, and has a solid mid-range shot. 4 million a year for a servicable big man is market value. Only negative is what does this mean for Richard Hendrix?

GRADE: B... solid player and gives us a reliable back up behind Biedrins.

4) Trading for Marcus Williams

I love this move a lot more than most. I liked Williams coming out of college and wanted the Warriors to draft him instead of POB. He got stuck behind Kidd and had a injury short his 2nd season in the league. However he is a pure point guard that can create for others, shoot 3s, steal the ball, and play little defense (sound familiar). Not bad for a future 1st rounder.

He'll be a back up PG to start, but I could see Nellie using Ellis and Williams together. Wouldn't be suprised if Williams eventually plays himself into the 6th man role.. leap frogging Buike as the 6th man and 1st guard off the bench.

GRADE: A... great potential at a need position for very little investment (lottery protected 1st rounders or two 2nd rounders).

5) Matching Azubukie 3yrs/9 million

Another good move for Mully. Buike will develop into a solid starter/6th man who plays within himself, can take it to the rack, shoot 3s, and play defense. Matching Buike also prevents him from making a division foe better (instant upgrade form their bench and potential starter there) and allows us more flexibility in the future as a potential trading chip or insurance at the SG/SF when Jackson's contract runs out and if Bellinelli never pans out. Maybe we're biased, but we all know Bukie will become a good NBA and getting a YOUNG rotation player for 3 million a year is a great move.

GRADE: A ... could be better than Maggette

6) Re-signing Monta Ellis 6yrs/66 million

What more is there to say? Monta is our future, he is our franchise and will be a real offensive threat unlike J-Rich because he has better handles and can jump off 1 foot. Monta Ellis can consistently get himself to the rim and  has great finishing ability, couple that with his mid-range game and you have yourself an elite offensive player. His defense just needs to improve and I believe Monta has the work ethic to become a better defender. At the end of last season he also showed better playmaking ability and actually feed Biedrins the ball more in Pick and Roll situations over BD. I would much rather have Ellis for the next 6yrs for 66 million over Gilbert Arenas. People may say we overpaid... but Parker signed for the same deal and Ellis right now is just as good as TP, IMO.

GRADE: A ... Ability to get to the rim, finish, and mid-range game make him a lock to continue becoming an ELITE offensive scorer.

7) Signing Anthony Morrow

Worth a gamble after what he did in summer league.

GRADE: C... just because his chances to make the final roster are slim.

8) Re-signing Biedrins 6yrs/63 million

Another young player locked up for market value. After years of suffering with Dampier and Foyle dropping passes... watching Andris play has been a joy to watch. He has soft hands, great feet, and a knack for scoring underneath. On the defensive side he is a very good rebounder and changes shots... if only the refs gave him some respect instead of tagging him with BS fouls. He's still very young at 22 and we haven't even see him come close to realizing his potential until Nelson leaves or commits to playing him for 30 minutes and running a few plays for him. Before we got Harrington and Jackson.. Biedrins was developing a solid low post game. He's one of best young bigs and he already has 4 years of NBA experience and is a proven double double guy in limited minutes.

GRADE: A .... he's getting paid less than Bogut. 'Nuff said.

Overall Grade for Mullin thus far: B+

For some this off-season could be seen as a disaster, but outside of overpaying Maggette (which is the main knock on the deal $$$$, not Maggette himself) Mullin did a great job this off-season, IMO. Sure we lost BD... but we were losing WITH him. You play to win Championships and Mullin has set the team up this season to be balanced, flexible, and and competitive even with so many young players. He has certainly learned from his mistakes in the past and us Warrior fans will be looking back at this off-season a sthe beginning of a new era... the Dubs as Contenders.

 

 

 

 

 

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

6 recs  |  Comment 87 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Are you grading only Warriors signings and trades?

And excluding the 08’ NBA draft with the selection of Anthony Randolph and Richard Hendrix?

I like the work you put into this as well. A bit homer-istic for my tastes, but i’ve been a longtime negative warriors fan.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jul 28, 2008 2:04 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL
i m a warriors fan -so i m naturally pessimistic

build a team & destroy the roof

by Lat We N Trash on Jul 28, 2008 2:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

I excluded the draft as you can’t fully grade it until they have played and not for many more seasons.

How would you grade the signings?

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

[url=http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220]Sign Up for Goalline Blitz[/url]

by FLAxwless on Jul 28, 2008 2:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

to add...

I DEFINATELY agree with 1) and 3)

Having Monta and Williams in the backcourt is a bad idea. Both are undersized and not highly rated on defense. That’s like having a revolving door into the lane for our opponents.

Just because everyone else pays big men big money doesn’t mean its right. Biedrins can’t rebound over boarding studs like tyson chandler or dalembert. He can’t make or never attempts 15 foot jumpers. Judging by his free throws there’s very good reason why. He makes his points sporatically. I think we should have explored more trading options with him

by balleerj on Jul 28, 2008 2:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think we should have explored more trading options with him

trade for who? and for what? just curious what center out there could we have traded for or signed that can hit a 15 foot jumper ave. 10 boards a game and makes less $$$ than beans?

by Rach on Jul 28, 2008 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he's such a huge commodity

Then there should be interest in him right??
And there were several teams discussed as potential destinations for him this offseason.

by balleerj on Jul 28, 2008 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beans is also one of the few pf/c’s that can run warrior ball well.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Jul 28, 2008 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I respectfully disagree...

Wait Marcus Williams doesn’t play defense? Did you watch any game by BD last year? If he wasn’t guarding Kobe Bryant on national TV he wasn’t guarding anyone.

As for Biedrins let’s look at the numbers against the big men you mentioned…
vs NO – 10.3 REBs/29.3 min/3 games
vs PHI – 14 rebs/38 mins/1 game

Now let’s see Chandler’s numbers…
vs GS – 16 REBs/37.7 mins/3 games
vs PHI – 11 REBs/32 mins/2 games

Dalembert’s numbers….
vs GS – 10 REBs/29 min/2 games (1 game against Biedrins had 10 REB/33 mins)
vs NO – 11.5 REBs/34.9mins/2 games

What do we see? Biedrins played less minutes against NO because Nellie likes to go small. If you give Biedrins 37.7 minutes with that current rebound rate [(10.3rebs/29.3mins) * (37.7mins)] , he’ll pull down… 13.25 rebounds. Not far behind Chandler’s 16… but you have to remember Chandler has help in a buddy named David West who rebounds at 8.9 per game. The next best player on the Warriors is… gulp, Al Harrington at 5.4 rebounds per game. What this means is Chandler and West just have to worry about Biedrins pulling boards while Biedrins has to fight Chandler AND West for rebounds. Put a solid rebound with Biedrins and he’ll become even better.

Against Dalembert played less minutes than Biedrins when he faced the Warriors but you factor Dalembert’s rebound rate against the Warriors in the 1 game against Biedrins (10rebs/33 minutes) you get 11.5… less than Biedrins rate of 14 REBs in 38 minutes. Against Chandler he had more raw board then Biedrins but he also averaged 5 more minutes per game and the difference is 1.2 rebounds. I’m pretty sure Biedrins would grab more than 1.2 rebounds in 5 more minutes of play.

So looking at the numbers Biedrins is right there with Dalembert and Chandler at rebounding and they all average around 10 million a year. Last I checked Chandler and Dalembert couldn’t shoot 15 footers either. Dalmbert is a better shot blocker, but Biedrins is a better offensive player (52% FG vs 62% FG). Give Biedrins 3 more years of weight training and he’ll be just as strong as Chandler he already weighs more (235 vs 245) and a second rebounder on the team and he’ll be just as good as Chandler… if not better.

Biedrins is well worth 10 million a year for a starting center with soft hands, great quickness, and can rebound. If he was on a non-Nellie led team.. he would actually be able to use his quick feet to get to the rim and convert at 63%.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

[url=http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220]Sign Up for Goalline Blitz[/url]

by FLAxwless on Jul 28, 2008 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree about Biedrins

AB was the 3rd best rebounder in the league per 48 mins last season, after Dwight Howard and Marcus Camby. How can you argue with that? Check it: http://tinyurl.com/645lvn

At $9M/year, I don’t think we overpaid for him at all and I definitely don’t think the Warriors should consider trading him. I actually think he has more offensive game then most people think. Watch him put the ball on the floor at the 3PT line and take it strong to the rack line against the Suns last year:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gecuxYF3J8

And don’t forget that out-of-bounds alley-oop play that Nellie started running for him out of timeouts last year. You know, the one where AB starts at the top of the key, inbound pass goes to Jackson, who throws an alley-oop for AB, as he’s already cutting down the lane.

He’s young and is a hard worker. I think he’s offensive game is only going to improve over the coming seasons.

by EternalWarriorsOptimist on Jul 29, 2008 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the content, but have to respectfully disagree with grade for morrow signing

I saw this guy straight out ball in summer league, and ya I know its summer league, but this guy can ball, and ya I know everyone is going to say wait and see, but as for grading the deal, even if he doesn’t make the team, I would still give it a A, because you took the chance away from other teams signing him and it costs us peanuts, its not a guaranteed contract so we have all the flexibility and risk/reward is very high in our favor. I wish we coulda pulled something like that to get bobby brown….

by warriorbum on Jul 28, 2008 9:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on Morrow.

I could see signing Morrow being an A, but like I said it’s hard to hand out and A because his chances of making the roster are slim. All the other moves are far easier to grade because we are dealing with players WE KNOW will be on the roster. Morrow not so. HOWEVER, I do like his game… anytime you can hit the shoot you have a spot on an NBA team, but we need to see how good Morrow can really shoot, because right now he is in a ridiculous streak.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

[url=http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220]Sign Up for Goalline Blitz[/url]

by FLAxwless on Jul 28, 2008 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

too tough to call

really, he didn’t play in enough games to say that he’s the lights out shooter everyone thinks he is just yet. he shot the lights out in summer league, but that’s not a large enough body of work to say that the guy’s going to win the 3 point shootout next year. it seems like he can play, but we can’t be sure yet. if he makes the roster and keeps teams honest at the perimeter, great, then it’s an A signing. until then, i’m comfortable with the C that was given.

by cap'n hack on Jul 28, 2008 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

its been a great off season

only thing that could be percieved as a negative thing was BD leaving but as a result, we have a young and much deeper team that will be together for a long time

by 3Kings650 on Jul 28, 2008 10:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

as a long-time consistent Mullin critic

he did as well as could be expected after Baron opted out excluding the offer to Arenas, which fortunately for all of us didn’t pan out. Where Mullin missed was on reading his players – he should not have been that surprised even though we all were. That said, Turiaf is a good signing – addressing needs through FA and successfully snagging a RFA is rare these days, and Maggette will thriiiiiive in Nelson’s system. Did we over pay? ya, but we’re GS so we had to – it didn’t effect our RFAs either way. Re-signing them was a no brainer, as was matching KAz imo.

Williams – eh. He’s gonna back up PG & SG if nec but I wouldn’t expect too much from the NJ castoff we got for essentially 2 second rounders (I don’t think the first rounders will happen, and if they do we’ll all be happy to have been in the playoffs). Still, the deal was well-structured to not cost us too much if he didn’t pan out. Morrow is a very small gamble on a make-good basis. If you’re only grading him on those moves he did as well as could be expected imo.

by hardcore on Jul 28, 2008 11:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Did he really offer $100M to GA?

Or was it a ploy from GA’s agent?

I don’t know what you guys want from Maggs. When he starts living at the line while the opponents are trying to mount a comeback and our jumpers aren’t falling, you’ll be thrilled to have him around. To suggest that Maggs at 10M/year is a “C” and at 8M/year is a “B” is ridiculous. While I agree that 10M/year is a little over, if he could have been had at 8M/year, I’d be F-ing ecstatic. When and where is Buke going to become better than Maggs? True homerism on that one.

I think Mullin did a really good job this year in acquiring an underrated Maggette, stealing Turiaf from LA (you know they would have matched if they didn’t have to pay lux tax), getting M.Williams for a song, keeping the young talent, drafting two guys who’re currently doing exciting things, and picking up the Utah Revue MVP. A solid, solid offseason if you ask me.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 28, 2008 11:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

mullin's moves

A from the ownership
F from me.

All his maneuvering will (to most fans’ eyes) at least keep us competitive thus selling tickets and fattening Cohan’s wallet.

However we are pinning our hopes again on the Garry St. Jean oft used line “internal development”.

I am just waiting for Jackson to do a Sprewell on Mullin so we can start clean and fresh. At some point this reclamation project has to stop.

warriors dont fish they hunt!

by VonteegoCummings on Jul 28, 2008 11:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

The Morrow signing is a C? Even if he doesn’t make the roster, is that a big deal? This was an all reward, no risk signing, because the worst that happens is we cut him. Anything he adds is a bonus.

by belilaugh on Jul 28, 2008 12:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

if that's the thought

then give the signing a C+. if we’re lucky, he contributes marginally. everything good that happens is a bonus, but i don’t see much coming from him at all. by the same token, if i signed for the minimum it would be a C signing because i can’t hurt the team when i sat on the bench in street clothes, but there’s no chance of me helping either.

keep that in mind, mullin, i would be an average signing. hit me up if you’re interested.

by cap'n hack on Jul 30, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

'04-'05 anyone?

Am I the only one that thinks this offseason compares to the extensions and signings circa 2004-5 when Mullin signed a bunch of guys that had never proven they could win anything on their own to huge deals? (Murphy, Foyle, Dunleavy and Richardson). What’s he going to do when the Biedrins/Ellis/Magette squad tops out at 40 wins? This time, let’s hope he gets the ax. I’m ready for the post-Mullin era. Too bad we can’t ax Cohan.

by chacabuco on Jul 28, 2008 12:36 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I was Suprised by Biedrins Money

Especially because he I doubt it would have gone to Europe or at least did not have any concrete offers during negotiation. I think it would have been worth it to “sweat it out” for a few weeks for him to take 2 million less per season. Maggette would not have received 8 million a year from another squad so I think he got over paid. Ellis got what he deserved.

What does this reinforce? Players (BD especially) are not dying to play in the Bay Area. It has nothing to do with Mully, Nellie, or Cohen. It sucks but it is true.

by terryteagle on Jul 28, 2008 12:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maggette wouldn’t have received $8 from any of the teams that had $8mil to spend. But that’s not the real equation for “overpaid” since we don’t have a real open market for players. The equations of interest are: would another team in need of a swingman consider his contract prohibitive such that we cannot unload him? Would an offer of less money have been enough to get him to come here rather than take a lesser offer to be in a more desirable situation (e.g. MLE from the Spurs)? Did spending that money preclude us from spending money now or in the future that would have better been spent? I don’t know the answer to those questions, but that’s the real test that we have to work with, rather than that the other 3 teams didn’t offer him as much.

by jae on Jul 30, 2008 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The biggest gamble of this offseason isn’t the Maggette signing—it’s the experiment to see if Monta can be a viable NBA point guard. I think there’sno way to fully grade the offseason without knowing more about that gamble. If Mully and Nelson are right, and he does it well, it will have been an excellent offseason. If they’re just hoping he can do it and he actually can’t, not nearly as good.

My gut is that it’s been a successful offseason. We retained the three young guys we really needed to retain for fairly reasonable prices. We made one big free-agent signing - overpaid some, but got a good player who’ll fit our system well - and one smaller signing—I happen to think the Turiaf deal was a good one for the price. We made a pretty good low-cost gamble of a trade.

There are no glaringly ugly pieces on this team. Maggette’s being paid a bit more than he should, but it’s not an insane price for his services… he may put some pretty gaudy numbers up under Nellie, too, so I’m not convinced that he’d be untradeable if it came to that. Al’s overpaid, but that’ll be an asset in a year, if not sooner. Everyone else is being paid roughly what they’re worth. It’s a pretty flexible roster… if the Monta-as-PG experiment fails, we should be in a fine position to rejigger. There’s value in that.

Still, it’ll be hard to call the offseason a smashing success if it turns out that Monta can’t hang out point guard. Time will tell.

by onlxn on Jul 28, 2008 2:57 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Well Said...

This year will truly hinge on Monta’s ability to learn the point. Like you said, if it doesn’t work out it’s not the end of the world long term, but this season could get ugly. I’m optimistic that it will work, but hey… I’m kind of an optimistic guy so take it for what it’s worth.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Aug 3, 2008 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice post, here's how I'd grade it

<strong>1) Not re-signing Baron Davis
I give this an A+. Look at it this way: I would have give Mullin an F if he had given Baron that huge $65m contract. You only get the REAL fringe-All-Star-calibur Baron Davis playing for you only half the time. The other half of the time he’s either injured or he’s not playing hard on the court (as we saw alot of this past season). That huge lucrative contract will handcuff the Clippers sometime in the future, I guarantee it. Everybody says Baron Davis is the main reason for saving our franchise. How about having one of the best coaches ever to coach in Don Nelson? What about miraculously dumping Dunleavy and Murphy for Jackson and Harrington? How about the surprising emergence of Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins? Finding diamonds in the rough like Matt Barnes and Kelenna Azubuike? These things have contributed more to our franchise’s turnaround as anything. Baron Davis was the most symbolic and marketable player on our team, but he wasn’t the only reason why we’re now relevant. No other player in the league can shoot their team out of a game like Baron Davis can, just check out the stats. He’s among the league leaders (if not at the very top) of FG missed and 3pt missed, he’s historically shot bad percentages for his career in both, he doesn’t get to the line enough and when he does he’s hasn’t been a great FT shooter. He’s the definition of a volume scorer and if he didn’t bring so much charisma and swag he’d probably be scapegoated instead of worshipped.

2) Offering Brand and GA Max contracts

2a) Brand: B+. Brand is one of the few 20/10 real impact, championship-calibur big men in the league. I give it a B+ instead of an A because he’s coming off that injury and who knows if he’ll be the same. But when a big man like that becomes available to you, you have to do everything in your power to acquire him, even if it involves throwing max money at them. Yes, I’m still sad about the KG situation too.
2b) Arenas: D. Gilbert Arenas is in that “elite” company of players that can easily shoot your team out of a game. In this group are Baron Davis, Tracy McGrady, and, I’m sorry to say, Stephen Jackson on his worst days. He’s not a max money type player. You can’t build a championship calibur team around him. Is it any coincidence that the Wizards didn’t get any worse with Gilbert Arenas sitting out? Gilbert’s a fan favorite, I love his swag, he’s entertaining, but him and his max contract do not equate to winning. And the sad thing is that they may have 3 All-stars on their squad in the upcoming years but they’ll never advance past Lebron James and the Cavs. And to make things worse, him coming to the Warriors would have kept Monta Ellis at SG and we’d forever have the worst defensive backcourt in the league.

3) Signing Corey Maggette 5yrs/50 million

B-. I was upset at this signing at first. I don’t want to see Stephen Jackson dribbling around at SG. I don’t want to see another ballhog come to this team and stop the beautiful ball movement. I wanted Josh Smith instead, I wanted Iguodala instead, or Okafor, or another big name free agent. However, Smith, Iguodala, and Okafor aren’t coming and Maggette was the cream of the crop. Not only that, but he brings many aspects to the Warriors in which we were severely lacking. He’s a solid rebounder. He gets to the free throw line whenever he wants, and he’s an outstanding free throw shooter. This is something we severely needed in our halfcourt offense, instead what we got was Baron Davis jacking up off balance 3’s. $50mil is a little too much for Maggette, but anything less and he probably would’ve gone to a contender for the MLE (Spurs or Celtics) instead.

4) Signing Ronny Turiaf 4/17 million
A-. Give me the name of better solid backup center (who Don Nelson would’ve actually played, mind you) who we could’ve acquired this offseason. You can’t think of one, can you? I can’t either. It’s no secret that the Warriors biggest hole in the depth chart was backup center. Matt Barnes and Al Harrington just weren’t gonna cut it. Turiaf does all of the things a decent big man needs to do: he rebounds, he bangs, he blocks shots (very well). The quirky personality and amusing English, the Energizer-Bunny-like energy, and midrange jumpshot are all bonuses. We stole him from a team that couldn’t afford to keep him, and we stole him for a price less than what an “average NBA player” is supposed to make. You’ll be hardpressed to find big men that can contribute for less than $4.25m/yr. Turiaf only gets the “minus” for that ugly, ugly ghetto ponytail he was rocking in the playoffs last year. Don’t come in here with that, Ronny.

5) Trading for Marcus Williams
A. Scouted as a big, true point guard. Trading away a future unprotected first rounder? No harm done. Low risk, extremely high reward. Fills a need. Great signing.

6) Matching Azubuike 3yrs/9 million
A. It was a no brainer move. Don Nelson can never have too many swingmen. Belinelli and Randolph are still unproven. Azubuike completes our depth chart and $3m/yr is still an absolute steal; Kelenna’s far from “below average” as his salary might indicate.

7) Re-signing Monta Ellis 6yrs/66 million
D. Here’s where it starts to go downhill. Yeah he’s exciting, yeah he can score. But there’s still a chance he might crash and burn trying to play PG. Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers. And he’ll never play for a championship at SG, because at his size and defensive disposition, it just won’t happen. I just don’t see the point of bidding against ourselves to keep him now when it’s unnecessary. If we can sign him at a bargain price, maybe like $7m/yr then sure go ahead. If not, what’s the worst that can happen? He signs for the QO and is forced to prove to us that he can run PG, the position he NEEDS to play in the NBA. If he succeeds, if he shines at that position, then yeah we can throw all the money we want at him and we still have his Bird Rights next offseason. It’s not like everyone in the league is going to be trying to steal him away anyway. Nobody even signed him to an offer sheet this offseason. Nobody. And in the unlikely chance that one of the crap teams under the cap (like MEM, MIN, etc) does try to sign him next offseason, we can always outbid them. There was no point in bidding against ourselves for Monta Ellis this offseason, especially when he’s unproven at the position he needs to learn. Don’t get me wrong, I love Monta Ellis. He’s going to be my favorite player to watch this season. But it was still a bad management move on Mullin’s part.

8) Signing Anthony Morrow
A. Low risk, high reward. It would’ve been hard not to sign the guy after the kind of Summer League he had. Even if he doesn’t pan out, no big loss there. I really hope he does make the team. Even if he spends most of the season in the DLeague, he’ll be a nice emergency reserve.

9) Re-signing Biedrins 6yrs/63 million
D+. Similar to the Monta Ellis signing. Biedrins is a great rebounder, I’d even say a dominating rebounder. But I’m not sold on his defense at all. For some reason, he stopped blocking shots for us and started trying to take charges against point guards. His offense is efficient and good enough, even if it doesn’t improve. But he’s never ever going to be able to handle guys like Yao Ming or Tim Duncan. Yet still, I don’t believe there’s anybody else on the market better than him. However, we bid against ourselves on this one again. As an RFA, Biedrins gained no interest around the league. The bogus rumor of him getting offers of $10m from Russia were just that: bogus. Why didn’t that Russian team try to sign him to an offer sheet then? Oh yeah, they didn’t cuz it was just a desperation leverage move by his agent. Again, I would’ve been all for signing him at a hometown hookup of like $8m/yr. And if not, let him sign the QO and let him prove that he can get his shotblocking prowess back and stop those little point guards from getting the And1’s on him. And then next offseason we still own his Bird Rights, we can still outbid those crap teams with capspace that nobody wants to play for. Then we can bid for him, no point in bidding against ourselves. But since he is a center and that is the hardest position to fill with talent in this league, I’ll give Mullin the “plus” here.

Overall Grade for Mullin thus far: B. Lots of solid moves. But potentially two very huge mistakes.

by YaHeard on Jul 28, 2008 4:17 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

pretty much

I pretty much agree with you. Some good moves and a lot of bad moves. There’s a lot of if’s that have to be decided before it can be said this offseason was a success.

by balleerj on Jul 28, 2008 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ya

I think that’s a great set of points made overall. Letting Davis go in the big picture made sense. Marcus Williams may turn out to be worth that 1st round pick. Signing Azubuike for 3 million makes sense if you’re trying to make smart business deals. Don’t enough about Morrow yet to make an accurate guage. I think re-signing Ellis AND trying to convert him to more of a play making PG is a large stretch for a kid who made a name for himself playing the small SG along with a bigger PG in Baron. Monta(yyyy) Ellis’ agent did a great job in negotiating the same way Rashard Lewis’ agent did a great job last year.

I don’t like Maggette myself ,but I’m not a Warriors fan so I don’t have to worry about him. I am a Kings fan so I’m not enjoying a duo of Jack and Maggs destroying the Kings off the dribble for 2 qtr’s at a time. Oh wellz. Excellent post YaHeard.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 28, 2008 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay,

this Biedrins is bad at defense stuff is getting way overblown. I’m sorry but I can’t even remember a single time he tried taking a charge from a point guard (maybe once or twice, but I think you are thinking of Al Harrington). The perimeter defense last season was atrocious. Every single replay they showed on FSN had every Warrior (besides Jackson) give up trying to stay in front of their man and just go for a steal, or leave their guy for a double team on almost every single play (losing a key element of the successful double team, surprise) and then Biedrins having to back away from the man or jump straight up (and he’d still get called) so he wouldn’t foul out and force Don Nelson to play O’Bryant or Perovic. Attempting to block shots would have been a huge risk with that lack of depth. You can’t flip that on him and call it a negative. Biedrins was in a no win situation, and he still turned out some good performances. Remember his defense on Garnett, or on Howard? He is an easy scapegoat for the Warriors defensive problems and no he’s not an elite defender, but in my opinion he is above average when on a team with passable perimeter defense.

Sorry if that didn’t make sense. I knew what I wanted to say but I didn’t know how to say it.

by belilaugh on Jul 28, 2008 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

it made sense. The warriors crappy defense has all been put on his shoulders. A lot of the time it looked like he was the only one even trying to play D out there.

by kinetic on Jul 28, 2008 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+100000000000

and if he ever did try to take a charge from a little man it’s only because he figured out that he’ll have a better chance of getting that call from the moronic refs who call a foul on him everytime he goes straight up for a block and gets jumped into

by AJC3317 on Jul 28, 2008 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's exactly what I mean

Biedrins just jumps straight up in the air with his hands up. That’s practically the definition of a blocking foul, from the NBA.com website:

A block/charge foul occurs when a defender tries to get in front of his man to stop him from going in that direction.

Biedrins jumps up to impede the offensive player’s body, he doesn’t even try to defend against the shot, he just jumps up to stop them. And that’s why he gets called for the foul every time.

You don’t defend the rim against smaller players that way. That’s exactly how Monta Ellis makes a living in the lane: he initiates the contact against bigger players, draws the foul, and sometimes finishes the continuation. You wanna see how a shotblocker does it, go youtube Mutombo or Camby. They don’t try to “body up” the guards or stop them in the air, they give space and reach for the block.

And I’m not going to give Biedrins a break on defense. He is the last line of defense and that is the center’s job, he’s the biggest dude on the court for us. I don’t give a damn that our perimeter defense was a revolving door, becase that should only inflate his amount of blocks. Ex. The Nuggets have had probably the worst perimeter defense the last couple years. Is it just a coincidence that Marcus Camby’s blocks have skyrocketed in the last couple of years too? He’s blocking 3.6 shots per game at age 34 and at the tail end of his career. Has he suddenly gained 4 inches of vertical? Been taking HGH under everyone’s noses? No it’s because he’s a shotblocker and he’s getting more opportunities to block shots due to the Nuggets’ lackluster perimeter defense.

Our perimeter defense is nearly as bad. Yet Biedrins isn’t even a premier shotblocker. He just gives up And-1’s. Lots of And-1’s with his jumping up into the air with his hands up.

And I’m well aware that shotblocking does not define a great shotblocker. But in this case, Biedrins doesn’t defend the post nor have quick hands. Okay he moves his feet well and can rotate on screens, I’ll give him that. But the next time I see the other team’s PG waltz by Monta, jump into Biedrins’ rigid jumping act, and then finish the continuation because Biedrins isn’t trying to block the shot, I’m going to think of Ellis’ 67mil and Biedrins’ potential 63mil and be very very sad.

by YaHeard on Jul 29, 2008 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Monta does not get to the line that much

He avoids contact and scores because he’s such a great finisher.

The definition you cite clearly states that the defender must be trying to get in front of the offensive player. Well, he’s already occupying the space. It’s really just hard for refs to make a judgment call on whether he’s jumping straight up or jumping at. He’s got to get his body close and then jump away to take that judgment call out of play.

Beans is not a “shotblocker”, he’s a defender.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 29, 2008 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jumping straight up!

Isn’t getting in front of his man to stop him from going in that direction. If a player jumps straight up then he already owns that position. There fore it’s not a foul if the defender jumps straight up because he is already in front of his man. He dosen’t have to move to get in front of man. It’s a charge not a block, but you can’t take a charge so close to the basket, so it should be a NO CALL!!!

by Psion on Jul 29, 2008 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that's how I see it too

Refs call you for angling your arms over somebody on the jump. Hands straight up from an established position is what they want to see.

"[Greg] Vaughn is in a funk so deep, George Clinton wearing a miner's helmet couldn't find him."
- Jim Baker, ESPN.com, May 2002

by achiappanza on Jul 30, 2008 7:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem is that if you jump up straight

You’re expecting the ref to notice that you’re jumping up straight. In basketball, with 3 refs and so many things going on at once, and fouls that need to be called in tenths of a second, it’s asking a lot from the refs. I’m sure they usually let play go on, but sometimes they’ll get it wrong, more than once a game. If you’re jumping backwards, away from the player with the ball, you’ve got more of a shot to avoid the foul call. Thus, you need to move your feet a little more and then jump backwards into the position you want to be in for the block… hopefully Beans picks up this technique.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 30, 2008 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

defense on Garnett and Howard

From my memory, I can recall Al Harrington having more prominent defensive moments playing center than Biedrins’ has. I can remember Harrington’s surprisingly good post defense on Yao Ming and Dwight Howard. When Al Harrington impresses me more playing center than Biedrins does, there’s something not right there.

And it wasn’t like Biedrins was always in foul trouble either. There’s a reason why he only averaged 27 minutes per game last season, and only 3.5 fouls per game. It wasn’t as if Nelson was telling him “Hey try not to pick up fouls because I need your defense for 40 minutes tonight.” Nelson was gonna sit him regardless, I don’t buy the “to prevent him from fouling out” argument.

by YaHeard on Jul 29, 2008 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

biedrins was benched alot

Once he got into foul trouble Don Nelson didn’t care if he came back into the game most nights. If you owned him in fantasy basketball it was extremely frustrating to watch him get 20/20 one night then 7/3 for the next 2 nights.

by balleerj on Jul 29, 2008 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you’re severely misreading Monta’s market value. Beans’s too, but especially Monta’s.


If we can sign him at a bargain price, maybe like $7m/yr then sure go ahead. If not, what’s the worst that can happen? He signs for the QO and is forced to prove to us that he can run PG, the position he NEEDS to play in the NBA.

1) I agree with you in the sense that if Monta wants to become one of the ten or twenty best players in the league, he’ll NEED to do that at point guard. He doesn’t NEED to do that to be an effectively player. The current SG version of Monta, defensive warts and all, is already one of the thirty or forty best players in the league. He’s won one Most Improved Player Award, and was in the running for a second… it’s safe to say we haven’t seen his best yet. (Incidentally, he cut his turnovers dramatically last year, and his A/TO wasn’t out of line with a number of point guards’... I don’t think it’s an absolute given that he can’t hang there.)

Monta is worth $66 million even if he doesn’t pan out at PG. If he does pan out at PG, he’ll be close to max-level quality, and we’ll have saved quite a bit of dough.

2) What’s the worst that could happen if we sign him to a qualifying offer? Well, it’s pretty obvious—we’d almost definitely lose him.

It’s not like everyone in the league is going to be trying to steal him away anyway. Nobody even signed him to an offer sheet this offseason. Nobody.

Nobody signs anybody to offer sheets, because their original teams almost always match. You actually think nobody wanted Monta?

Two of the teams who are known to have badly wanted him - approached us about sign-and-trade possibilities - are the Knicks and Grizzlies. Under your scenario, we’d sign him to a QO and then let him test the free agent market as an unrestricted. He’d be able to choose from, among others,

A) the team in the league’s, and country’s marquee city, that loves him,
B) the team that plays nearest to his hometown, that can offer him a max contract, that loves him, and
C) the team that had just slapped him in the face with a qualifying offer.

If you ask me, Monta would be gone, baby… gone.

“Except,” you might say. “We can still offer more money than anyone else.” True—we could offer an extra year. So in other words, we could either let Monta walk, or maaaaaybe keep him by signing him to a max contract. But how is that better than what actually happened? We hold off on signing him for a year to force ourselves to pay even more, by entering into bidding wars?

We didn’t waste money by grabbing the guy now… if anything, we saved money. On the open market, a year from now, Monta would almost definitely make more than $66 million. Beans too… like others, I think you’re really underrating his defense, and consequently his overall value. You don’t toss qualifying offers at guys as good as these two. If you don’t think they’re that good, fair enough… but the Warriors do, and by all indications, the other teams in the league do, too.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 2:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Monta Ellis

I’m not doubting that Ellis can score in this league. He’s proven he can score as a SG, he’s going to prove he can score as a PG, and he’ll probably score even more as the years go on. That’s not my problem.

Monta’s “defensive warts” are what bother me. Whether or not he pans out as a PG is quite a big deal. As an SG, 6’3” 175lb Monta can’t really guard anyone. In fact, in guarding PG’s this year, Monta can’t really guard anyone. Kobe Bryant, Tracy McGrady, Brandon Roy, Kevin Martin, and every other “normal sized” SG in the West would singlehandedly make sure that we wouldn’t get past the first round of the playoffs if Monta Ellis is trying to guard them. And I don’t think Marcus Williams can handle those guys either, just due to shear size difference alone. This is why Monta needs to be a decent PG, so we can play a normal-sized SG next to him.

And if we and the rest of the league soon discover that Monta Ellis really can’t run the PG position, and he’s a crippling defensive liability guarding SG’s, and he can barely guard PG’s, and his contract stands at 5 yrs and 55mil remaining and is immovable; then we’re in big, big trouble.

by YaHeard on Jul 29, 2008 3:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think most teams already know that Monta can’t defend SGs. Teams have scouts, they’re always evaluating talent… I don’t think that’d be news to anybody. Other teams would still be happy to have him at the price we’re paying.

1) NBA players, especially perimeter players, tend to get better at defense as they age. It’s extremely unlikely that Monta will stay this bad defensively.

2) A lot of teams have PGs big enough to defend SGs, negating a lot of the risk with Monta.

3) There are max-contract players who are worse defensively than Monta. I’d take Monta’s defense ten times out of ten over Steve Nash’s… Nash is a max guy, and deservedly so. Amare Stoudemire plays a more important defensive position than Monta, and is absolutely terrible at it… just about every team in the league would love to have Amare Stoudemire. Gilbert’s not a good defender. Rashard Lewis isn’t.

It’s easy to stare at a guy’s flaws until you just want to give up on the guy altogether. Monta’s defense is currently a flaw. He’s still enormously valuable - $66 million worth of valuable - with that flaw. A 22-year-old who scores that efficiently, who rebounds well for his position, whose passing is excellent for a 2-guard, who shows significant improvement every year in the league… people want that guy. The possibilities outweigh the risks.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick question... do you think Kevin Martin is worth 11 million per year?

You think Kevin Martin is worth the dough?

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

[url=http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220]Sign Up for Goalline Blitz[/url]

by FLAxwless on Jul 29, 2008 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure… he’s borderline at that price, I’d say. I AM sure I’d rather have Monta for the same amount. Monta’s three years younger, a slightly better rebounder, a significantly better passer. Martin’s a bad defender in his own right, and the areas in which he outpaces Monta – three-point shooting, free-throw shooting - are areas in which players are most likely to improve. Which brings up the biggest gap between them - Monta is still improving in significant ways year-to-year. It’s not nearly as evident that Martin is… what you see is likely what you get with him.

Martin’s a very good player, but Monta’s just as good, and much more likely to improve from here.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They’re similar in value. Their rebounding is ridiculously similar. Monta’s ever so slight per minute advantage last year was due to a faster paced game with more opportunities. Martin’s rebounding percentage was a bit higher. The difference is not much. Martin’s “true shooting percentage” (a measure of how likely he is to successfully score on a per-possession basis) outclasses Monta’s, by quite a bunch, and Monta is no slouch at all. Monta seems to be the better ball handler and is younger and hasn’t shown that he’s hit the plateau of his improvement. I really cannot objectively pick between the two. Both are great players to have.

by jae on Jul 29, 2008 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right. I’d take Monta because there’s a bit more reason to think he could improve further, but you’re in very good shape with either, weak defense and all.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nash is not a max guy. Nash will make $12,250,000 this year. That’s far, far, far below the max a player can make.

by jae on Jul 29, 2008 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My mistake—I thought Phoenix extended him. Didn’t realize he was still under that original deal. Man, what a sweet signing for them.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea!

and what a stupid no signing by Dallas. Their posible ring went to Phoenix with Nash

by Psion on Jul 29, 2008 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last I checked....

Nash is currently playing in the perfect system for his abilities, and he still hasn’t sniffed a ring.

Oh, an puh-leeze, even if they’d somehow pulled out that series against SA after “the bump”, they still probably would have lost to Utah.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 30, 2008 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

phoenix

has come closer than you’re giving them credit for. they were the best team in the league in 2006/7. i’ll stand by that. san antonio was the only team that could have beaten them that year and they did through a lot of dirty play. if san antonio isn’t kicking the back of amare’s leg on dunks, hip checking nash, kneeing nash in the crotch and the like, phoenix wins that series and a championship.

of course, dallas’s potential ring went to miami with d-wade not to phoenix.

by cap'n hack on Jul 30, 2008 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's happened before

Bad Boys? Celtics of the 80s? Yeah, the Spurs are a little dirty. That’s how they win. They rattle their opponents. The only way to negate that is to have a crazy man like MJ who uses that to play better. The playoffs and the regular season are completely different.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 31, 2008 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wish i could argue with that

but you’re right. and i think it’s an issue that the nba should address (not that series in particular, i’m comfortable with the nba not going back and giving the suns a championship retroactively). the suns were a better team than the spurs were, but in the playoffs, teams like the spurs are essentially allowed to do whatever they want. i understand the need to let teams play when it counts, but if amare and diaw get suspended for coming off the bench and not hitting anyone, and bowen doesn’t for kicking amare on a dunk, something that is incredibly dangerous, the league needs to look into some rule changes. dirty play should earn you ejections if caught right away, and suspensions if not. and it’s not just the spurs, how the hell does kidd not have to sit out the rest of the series after attempting to murder pargo on a layup attempt? that’s not a hard foul, that’s trying to break someone’s neck. playoff basketball should be basketball at it’s best, not worst.

by cap'n hack on Jul 31, 2008 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m talking about the year Dallas did make it to the finals and lost to Miami.

by Psion on Jul 30, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and as for free agency

The “open market” isn’t as open as everybody likes to think. Big names rarely move around in free agency. The few teams that actually do have enough space under the salary cap to sign a big name free agent are usually the most unattractive franchises in the league, which is why they have so much cap space in the first place.

This offseason was somewhat of an anomaly, with Brand signing with PHI and Maggette signing with us. Before this, I can only think of a couple big names changing teams via free agency: Arenas (which was a freak occurence due to cap issues), Boozer, and Rashard Lewis (for which the Magic had to throw max money at to entice him away.)

As history shows, the chances of Monta actually walking away next season (even as an unrestricted free agent) would be slim to nil, unless the Warriors specifically didn’t try to get him back.

Why are we paying for potential when we can still rent the two young’ns out for one more season and find out how they develop? I’d rather wait a year and give them $80+mil contracts knowing in full confidence that I’ve seen as much of their growth as I can and am in a better position to know what they’ll give me in the future. I think that’s a better business decision than rushing out these $60+mil contracts for flawed players with deficiencies so important (a 6’3” SG that can’t defend and a center that can’t defend the post nor block shots anymore) that we may never advance past the first round.

You believe we saved money by signing them earlier. I’d rather reduce risk, even if it involves paying them a few extra million next year as long as I know what I’m paying for.

by YaHeard on Jul 29, 2008 3:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The reason that big names rarely move around in free agency is that teams rarely let extremely good players get to free agency. That’s why the RFA structure exists—to give teams a chance to keep the good guys they find. If a guy becomes unrestricted, there’s an extremely good chance he’s going to bolt. Kobe stayed because he was already in his dream market… Arenas stayed because he liked his team. But Tracy McGrady left… Steve Nash left. Elton Brand left. If the door is open, guys very well might leave. You don’t open the door unless there’s a pretty damn good reason to.

Why would Monta and Biedrins stay? Is there any history of players of their level only receiving qualifying offers from their teams? It may have happened before, but I can’t recall when, and I’m pretty damn sure that if it did happen, those teams weren’t able to sign those guys afterwards. Extending QOs to two guys as accomplished as Monta and Biedrins - two guys who are already very good NBA players, and getting better - would be a scorched-earth kind of move. It’d be telling them that we don’t value what they’ve done up to this point. And literally everyone - their agents, their families, other players, the media - would tell them not to put up with that shit. Maybe we’d be able to keep one of them by paying through the nose, but I fail to see how that’s a better outcome for us.


Why are we paying for potential when we can still rent the two young’ns out for one more season and find out how they develop? I’d rather wait a year and give them $80+mil contracts knowing in full confidence that I’ve seen as much of their growth as I can and am in a better position to know what they’ll give me in the future. I think that’s a better business decision than rushing out these $60+mil contracts for flawed players with deficiencies so important (a 6’3" SG that can’t defend and a center that can’t defend the post nor block shots anymore) that we may never advance past the first round.

We’ll just have to agree to disagree on Biedrins’s D. I thought he was extremely effective this season, given the defensive assigments he had… I don’t actually remember centers having a bunch of huge games against us. I remember a bunch of power forwards having huge games against us, but then that just underlines our need for a power forward… that doesn’t mean Biedrins sucks. He could block a few more shots, but shot-blocking is somewhat overvalued as a defensive component, anyway. In my eyes, the guy plays solid defense… it’s part of the reason I think he’s worth $60 mil. (Lest we forget, one of the league’s best teams - and most storied defensive teams - offered a former Finals MVP for the guy… clearly the Pistons didn’t think his defense was a deal-breaker. We turned that deal down, as everyone thought we should. People in the league understand the value of a guy like Biedrins.)

As for Monta, here’s the problem: what do you do if you extend the QO and it turns out that he can’t hang at point guard offensively? Do you just let him walk? Do you lose a guy with that level of scoring efficiency, that youth, that upside, because he can’t do one thing you asked him to?

A Monta who can play point is worth, let’s say, $90 million over six. I mean, he’d be a dynamite player. If we let him hit the open market, we’d probably have to pay over that or lose him outright. So in the best-case scenario, it’d be an enormous, critical mistake to wait to extend him.

The real question is what a Monta who can’t play point is worth - what this year’s Monta was worth. You seem to think that he’s not worth much - that, given his defensive limitations, he’s not a guy we would particularly miss if we lost him. I’m concerned about his defensive limitations, but I’d really like to keep that guy, and I think he’s worth $66 million as a two-guard. More to the point, I’m pretty sure other teams think he’s worth that, too. I don’t see it as paying for potential… I see it as paying for production, with added potential as a bonus.

I dunno, man. I get the theory of what you’re saying—that when you make a commitment this big, you want to gather as much information as you possibly can beforehand. In practice, though, I just don’t see how it’d be worth it. There’s no scenario where we don’t want these guys on our basketball team a year from now. By extending QOs, we’d open ourselves to the possibility of losing them, and the likelihood of paying much more, and the only benefit would be saving a little cap space in a season where we don’t need it. I don’t see how the benefits outweigh the risks.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

response

very good arguments and well-written posts, and I can’t fault anything you’re saying here. I’m just a little too defensive-minded to fully agree. Yes it’s true there are many many max contract players in the league who play absolutely no defense, and, uncoincidently, they don’t play for championship-contending teams. It’s my theory set in stone that a big money player should excel on both sides of the floor.

by YaHeard on Jul 29, 2008 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with that, and I’m not at all convinced that Monta and Biedrins can be part of a championship-level core (though the evaluation of Biedrins’ defense is a key difference here—remember, a championship-level D-minded team offered their best player for him).

Thing is, in team-building, you have to acquire and retain value. Monta and Beans aren’t A-plus players, but discarding everyone until the A-plus players come along just doesn’t work. We’re more likely to be able to land guys like that by having real value on our team Letting Monta and Beans leave would just give us less to play with… cap space, as you say, isn’t a cure-all for franchises like ours.

If our goal is to win a championship, we get closer to that goal by signing desirable guys to desirable contracts. I regard these guys, and their contracts, as desirable. And if we decide we want to go in a different direction, we will have zero trouble trading them. Most teams would be overjoyed to pay 66 million dollars for the services of Monta Ellis.

by onlxn on Jul 29, 2008 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If our goal is to win a championship, we get closer to that goal by signing desirable guys to desirable contracts. I regard these guys, and their contracts, as desirable. And if we decide we want to go in a different direction, we will have zero trouble trading them. Most teams would be overjoyed to pay 66 million dollars for the services of Monta Ellis.

Too true. What’s nice about the signings is that by-and-large, they’re deals that would have been acceptable for what the players have done and, because basketball players tend to be rather consistent and 22 year olds rarely go on downslopes at that age, are very likely acceptable for the play they’re likely to continue to provide. Any improvement is gravy; it’s not something we need to justify the spending. (Yes, I know many believe without “post moves” Biedrins isn’t worth it. That’s simply wrong.)

by jae on Jul 29, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well put Jae

Very well said.

Ellis got the same deal as Kevin Martin and Tony Parker. I’d say he’s equal if not better than Martin and is better player than TP after 3 years on the league. So Ellis deal if he doesn’t pan out as a PG won’t be a burden to trade.

Same with Biedrins. He’s getting less money than peers Andrew Bogut and Okafor.

If these guys NEVER IMPROVE… they will still be worth those contracts just based on their numbers 20/5/4/50% FG and 10/10 big man.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

[url=http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220]Sign Up for Goalline Blitz[/url]

by FLAxwless on Jul 29, 2008 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's with the love fest?

Isn’t somebody supposed to chime in about how Beans is overpaid and he does nothing except commit fouls or something?

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 30, 2008 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of the time it looked like he was the only one even trying to play D out there.

He might be tryin but he don’t look very good at it. You’d think someone his size would hurt someone occasionally ? He seems a little soft for a big man?

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 28, 2008 9:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah...

cuz that’s the sign of a good defensive big. Hurting someone. Right.

by kinetic on Jul 28, 2008 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

cuz that’s the sign of a good defensive big

A little intimidation goes a long ways. If they are afraid to get in the paint it’s easier to guard them.

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 28, 2008 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe playing pickup ball...

but we’re talking about the NBA.

by kinetic on Jul 28, 2008 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

two consecutive off seasons where the dubs will be "taking a step back"

to eventually get better.

JRich and Baron were my favorite players, but i think mullin is making some very bold moves but doing the right thing in taking a step back to eventually take leaps forward.

trading JRich was seen as taking a step back
but it allowed us to keep monta and andris as well as sign free agents this summer
we still had a better record and were practically a 50 win team
we haven’t even scene the outcome of the biggest return of that trade in Brandon Wright

letting Baron go
ultimately he wasn’t going to bring us a ring. he was too injury proned and always seemed to run out of gas late in the year. the timing wasn’t right to keep him around because his window is small and we didn’t have the pieces in place.
Letting him go created space for the Free agent signings and furthered the cause for keeping AB and Monta
Put monta in the drivers seat on this team and opens the door for monta to be a star pg

Hopefully Bwright will be a stud sooner than later. Hopefully Maggette replaces barons scoring. Hopefully monta becomes a star and AB continues to improve. Hopefully Turiaf is that beast that we needed. and Hopefully Marcus williams is that backup pg that we always needed.

by Agent Zero on Jul 29, 2008 12:04 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

scene

**seen

i just wanted to correct that so you won’t thing im stupid

by Agent Zero on Jul 29, 2008 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

did you see summer leagues?

B Wright couldn’t even score on summer league players…I would trade him while his value is still high.
Look at his physical stat line! Marcus Williams weighs the same amount as him.

He’s a tweener right now, and not in a good way. He plays like a PF but his body is like a SF.

by balleerj on Jul 29, 2008 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His performance in real NBA games was better than what he did in the summer league. I wouldn’t judge much by summer league performance.

by jae on Jul 29, 2008 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you hear about Baron?

He lost a game of horse to my kid brother. Baron is such trash, I don’t understand how he makes it in the NBA.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 29, 2008 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

AHAHHA what?

you don’t understand how someone who averages over 18ppg and 8apg makes in the NBA?

JRich 23

by warriorsalltheway on Jul 30, 2008 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

You might have wanted to read the previous posts before posting.

by 15thefuture8 on Aug 5, 2008 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Simple for me.......

I give Mullin an “A” especially in light of the cash/pieces that were available, the belief that our youngsters can become one of the most exciting teams in the league, now supported by some key pieces that give us much better depth.

No we did not sign a “Big name” but so what…. I prefer the fact that once again we will be seen as the underdogs and we might, just might surprise everyone this year and I could easily see us getting 50 wins this season. I know many disagree, but we will see in a years time how we did?

Well done Mullin, I was worried at the start of the summer but now I am very much looking forward to watching the team next year from my season seats!

It's about heart, It's about fight, It's about being a Warrior!

by BritWarriorGSW on Jul 29, 2008 12:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

My turn

http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=9632

We’re doing a series at HOOPSWORLD that grades what each team has done so far and the Warriors were up this afternoon. It’s obviously been a busy few days, so there’s a lot to chew on here.

To summarize, I gave the team the following grades:
Maggette: B
Turiaf: B-
Azubuike: B+
Morrow: A-
Ellis: B+
Biedrins: A+
Williams: C
Randolph: A
Hendrix: C+
Overall: A-

There’s a bunch of words that go with those grades .. not sure if you’ll agree with anything I wrote, but let me know either way!

by pree on Jul 29, 2008 8:14 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

My only questions is "What grading scale are you using?"

Are you using the old-fashioned “C is average” scale or the new fandangled “Everybody’s special, so B is average”?

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 30, 2008 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

C is average, bro

That’s how I roll. Hendrix and Williams aren’t bad players, they just scream “meh” to me

by pree on Jul 30, 2008 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good article and good take

Though I do struggle to understand the comment to grade link on some of them… especially on Williams. You basically say that the pick is going hurt the Warriors and that Williams is a solid pickup, so why does that get the worst grade of the bunch?

Also the comments on Turiaf are pretty positive, and especially given that he’s making well below average “about to come into their prime big man” salary, it seems like a pretty good haul…

Good work, looking forward to the season actually starting. And very happy Mullin has turned the ship around. Now he just needs to open up the sail and let them fly.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 30, 2008 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And all you posters out there...

Take a look at what Pree’s done here. He’s got team grades in an article that he’s being paid to produce. But, rather than create a new post, he’s added the link in a similar post, allowing other topics to stay up and linking his ideas to similar ideas. Good stuff.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 30, 2008 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

cheers to that

the redundant fanposts are getting out of control. if you want to discuss a similar point, you’d be better off doing it in a fanpost already created. there’s more people that will read that one than the identical post made later, and legitimate discussion might be had there. as opposed to the barrage of “this topic has already been posted” remarks that come with a repeat post. i’d link to “artest to rockets” part deux to demonstrate, but it’s been deleted. so, case in point right there.

by cap'n hack on Jul 30, 2008 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A- ?!

B, B-, B+, A-, B+, A+, C, A, C+

4 Bs, 2 Cs, & 3 As

Overall: A- ???

Sure wish my teachers had “graded” that way!

Nonetheless, pretty generous even for you pree

by hardcore on Aug 2, 2008 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A little too free with the wallet...

Other than that, I think he did an admirable job, considering that it was Baron who opted out after the draft without any notice. Still wish they would have taken someone like Chalmers in the 2nd round (buying a 2nd pick is $1M). The Randolph pick was a steal.

The signings (Maggette and Turiaf) are good placeholders at the moment, and keeps up from the dumpsters while the young’ins continue develop. We may have some issues years from now signing the next crop of young places unless cheapo Cohan is willing to hit the luxury tax. I think this team is going upward and is different from the hopeful times of JRich, Murphy, and Dunleavy before they underperformed and the stuff hit the fan like usual. Still, I there’s a lot of progress to be made by our young players before Mullin will be proven right. There’s reason why some ppl hate Mullin as GM. Still, I think he’s making more good moves than wrong ones, and he’s getting lucky too (did not get Hibachi or Greedy Evans.

by Don't Mess With The Cohan on Jul 29, 2008 10:02 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

mullin deserves a B

1) Not re-signing Baron Davis
(A)
The 4th and 5th years of his contract would not be worth the money. He probably does not play 82 games again in a season for the rest of his career. And if you think about it, if his best year production-wise was 2007-2008 and he couldn’t make the all-star team (for whatever reasons) and could not get our team to the playoffs, do you still think he’s worth that commitment…? the western conference elite may be aging, but if the goal is to win a championship, it won’t be any easier for the dubs. he’s not worth mortgaging the future of the franchise when you can get rid of him and sign multiple average/above average players that give you a deeper bench and add to quality of play come spring-time.

2) Offering Brand and GA Max contracts
(GA = D, Brand A)
washington did better without agent 0 which says one thing, and the style he thrives in is not the open court fast-paced style the warriors have pinned their acquisitions around. arenas is a guard, and although the warriors did need a pg after baron left, there were younger, much cheaper, upside-type guards that would have better fit the run-gun system. on top of all this, arenas was coming off a disastrous injury…so if we offered that money to agent 0, we might as well have kept baron for a lil more guaranteed money.

brand was well worth the offer. although you can argue he was coming off an injury as well and his future health could be questionable, he plays in an impact position…pf…..if the warriors signed brand, they would have automatically been seen as a playoff team as we’d have a good combo in the middle with beans and brand eating 18-22 rebs a game by themselves on an average night.

3) Signing Corey Maggette 5yrs/50 million
(B+)
Great scorer, and if he becomes the 2nd or 3rd option on a team instead of the 1st option, he won’t be seen as a stop-baller ball hog…but rather, one who can drive and dish, spot up for shots and hit, and run with ellis and jack. 10 mil a year is a lil steep for a swingman who plays questionable d, but his offensive numbers are in the upper tier….although he does not replace baron’s presence and leadership, he instantly gives you the ppg lost by the loss of baron

3) Signing Ronny Turiaf 4/17 million
(B+)
the lakers would have loved to keep him if it did not mean going over the cap. he brings the interior presence and legitimate bench toughness that was previously lacking. a little overpaid, but you have to for a big man coming from the lakers.

4) Trading for Marcus Williams
(A)
low risk trade with giving up only a lottery-protected first round pick. he has way too much upside to not be playing in the rotation for at least 20mins per game. he has court vision, he can drive and shoot, and proved to be one of the best pgs in the nation pre-draft and pre-stealing computers. if he’s a bust (which i think not if he’s given pt), we still have cj and worst comes to worst, we can have a point forward system haha. but great move.

5) Matching Azubukie 3yrs/9 million
(A)
buke would have been (or almost have been) a starter on the clips. what turiaf brings in toughness to the front line, buke brings to the off-guard, small forward postions. he rebounds and defends off the ball better than any other bench players of his position and can hit key shots late in the game. he is also still very young, although people underestimate his upside.

6) Re-signing Monta Ellis 6yrs/66 million
(A)
This was a must. if there was one person to sign, it is monte. he is a high percentage shooting guard who is automatic from around the key and from 12-18 ft out. he is one of the quickest guards in the game and can get past anybody. and he showed some passing ability down the stretch last season. he is an up an coming star…no question.

7) Signing Anthony Morrow
(A)
Why not? he shot 70% from the field and will probably be making the league minimum. he probably will be doing garbage time if he makes the final dubs roster.

8) Re-signing Biedrins 6yrs/63 million
(A)
what other big men….....or what about what other players average (or nearly average in his case) a double-double every game who is under the age of 23 other than dwight howard, al jefferson or al horford. exactly. he is a rising star who showed increased rebounding prowess towards the end of last year and if he develops any kind of jump shot and drive move (very possible), could become unstoppable.

Overall Grade for Mullin thus far: B+

with the shocking loss of baron, mullin has given us an exciting and competitive team with upside enough to make us playoff contenders in the next several years. again…it’s just upside and what ifs….......the development of the youth this year will crucial as to how this young core will turn out and if we will be legitimate title contenders down the road.

you only win when you put in.
-J.

by dons on Aug 1, 2008 5:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bad Off Season

Maggette. what the hell, hes too self ish and decides too not play defense for some reason.. and we’re stuck with him for too long. He complains way too much to..

Turiaf.. 4 Mill for a screambox? Enough said.

Azubuike.- Oh god.. at least he makes the warriors the buffest team with him and Maggette. Just try not to be Kobe.

Marcus Williams- Well we needed a pg so this is fine

by gamebreaker24 on Aug 2, 2008 11:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If Mullie was the LAKERS gm WE would have to give him an A

but since he with the Warriors he gets a big fat F.

Till I go pee
Live life at KMart
Foot in mouth chasin me

by Skeptic Con Urquel on Aug 5, 2008 12:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Help Fire Don Nelson By Signing Petition
We_re_back__small
Terms of Service and Moderation on GSoM...
Small
Five Good Things So Far
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
The Warriors as Simpsons

Recent FanPosts

Lakers_small
Stephen Jackson - Trade Partner/Asset Analysis & Weighted Ranking
Britwarriorgswavatar_small
GSW Coaching - Who is the Boss?
Small
Don't trade Stephen Jackson
Pitofdespairguy_small
Warriors Chemistry and Leadership
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Jonny Flynn, Wayne Ellington, Corey Brewer: Summer Glimpse to Fall For-Real
Sp_baron_edited_small
Could the Warriors run the triangle offense?
Small
Would you be opposed to trading Ellis?
Australian_flag_reduced_small
Miami Interested in Stephen Jackson Trade
Small
Who is your starting 5 if you ran the team?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GSoM Motto

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae