Steinmetz: More JRich Trade Talk
Because Matt Steinmetz's article and Atma's posting of it got so much attention, I figure I'd post Steinmetz's response to some of the common reasons people cite for it being a good trade.
Because Jason deserves it, more talk about the Warriors trading Richardson
I received tons of feedback regarding my post about how trading Jason Richardson was a mistake. They seem to be running about 60-40 against. More important is that it’s still obvious that J-Rich is missed and respected around here.
I’d like to respond to a few of the criticisms and complaints. And by the way, the comments were excellent. Just real good stuff.
And because I'm curious, please vote in the poll below. I'd like to get a sense of what the community thinks of the trade 1 year later.
1 recs |
94
comments
| Add your comment
Comments
I voted Yes, mainly because it’s done already and I am used to the new squad. Maybe it’s also because I am a Tar Heel fan? But J-Rich was the heart and the soul of the squad before we hit the playoffs, and no doubt he remains one of my favorite warriors. So many fond memories, just like 2 years ago when he blocked Devin Harris and smiled as he got up while watching Devin cry like a baby.
by ejdacanay on
Jul 31, 2008 3:22 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
this is such a tough poll
i wouldnt make the trade because i think we would have had a better chance of making the playoffs last year.
i would make the trade because someone eventually had to go and the longer we waited the less we would have gotten.
I really wanted to make the playoffs last year.
but see, even if i want to vote “no”, the word “never” dictates that i would never in the future have wanted to trade JRich either. This is not true for me.
JRich’s trading may have impacted baron leaving as well… but I’m glad baron left, sooner rather than later. baron’s a great fixer, but his act gets old quick. he’s not having fun unless he’s drawing attention as the new guy, and everyone around him suffers the longer he stays in one spot.
OK. since the topic asks within the time frame of one year, i’ll vote no.
by dso on
Jul 31, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Your right. The trade wasn’t made with the next year in mind. It was made with the next 4-5 years in mind. Tough to judge it now. We saw what the flexibility has gotten us (Monta, Biedrins, Maggette, Ronny, Kelenna etc) but we won’t know for a couple years if this pans out and was a good trade.
by Nellieball on
Jul 31, 2008 3:40 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
WHAT?!
how can you people think this was a good trade??
?
?
by Foulacy on
Jul 31, 2008 3:40 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
you have to vote YES
context people. context. it was a move to position ourselves for kg. yes, i am a broken record. but it is the truth. the fact that we got bwright and cash considerations was nice, but the point wasn’t to
a) get rid of jrich’s contract
b) acquire brandon wright
That’s why so many people’s arguments here on the subject are flawed- we are not looking at it from the right angle. if you want to argue that the team is worse off w/o jrich, have at it. but it has nothing to do with The Trade itself. It was, and always will be, the right trade to have made.
"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."
by GameSix on
Jul 31, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
I’d definitely make it again. There’s a good chance we would’ve made the playoffs with J-Rich this year, and it was certainly disappointing that we missed them. But as I see it, there’s no way we would’ve made the second round… we most likely would’ve nabbed the eighth and gotten swept by the Lakers, much as the Nuggets did. I would’ve preferred that, but let’s not pretend that we would’ve all been exhilarated by such an outcome.
That team’s ceiling was low… any team with a good inside player had our number. That’s still true, but we now have a younger, cheaper, more flexible roster… we have a much greater chance of trading for an elite big man than we did a year ago. The team also looks pretty decent, to boot. I’ll take that over a capped-out, aging team that wasn’t ever going to reach the conference finals, no matter how sweet the memories are.
by onlxn on
Jul 31, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
a big reason many disagree was ignored
One reason many weren’t ready to agree with Matt was because the jury is still out on Wright. Matt’s refusal to acknowledge that Wright may be a very good player down the road makes his argument very one sided. I wright doesn’t get much better than he has shown – I agree with Matt – but it is too soon to say!
Wright, if you or any of your peoples are reading this – PLEASE PROVE MATT WRONG!
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on
Jul 31, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Probably saying this on the wrong post but the same can be said about Marco. Neither had significant playing time and when they did they produced.
I’m extremely annoyed at how people are calling Marco a bust before he’s had a chance.
This argument is filled with too many unknowns. We still don’t know how Wright’s going to pan out and we don’t know the outcome between the Warriors & Baron if J-Rich had stayed, a situation which shapes the salary situation.
by gunwing54 on
Jul 31, 2008 5:58 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
NO
Getting rid of J-rich’s contract was good but we could have traded him for more potential than brandan wright
probably could use him to get josh smith if we had him
by dancingchiapet on
Jul 31, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Why do you think we could have traded him for more than the Brandan Wright pick?
Based on what FAs are getting now, Richardson is “overpaid” relative to the wins he does (or more to the point, doesn’t) bring. He’s not a bad player. He’s a good, helpful player, but with limited resources he’s a bit of a liability making 12.2+million (11.1 at the time IIRC). Not too many teams really want to pay that for him, I’d imagine. He has value, but not to everyone and the contract limits the bidders. Charlotte was in a unique situation at that time. They had cap room to spare so they could take on his salary. The window was open then but it wasn’t going to remain open. They were the lone bidder, and as such, the compensatory price was what it was.
Just saying “we could traded him for more potential” is a vacuous statement supported by absolutely nothing other than that you said it. It doesn’t really seem to fit well with the reality of the cap, of the resources available or of other similarly productive player’s trade value. If you disagree, feel free to cite some reasons, but just saying it’s so carries zero weight.
Speculating that he’d be useful to get Josh Smith seems extreme. Why exactly would ATL want to have him at that salary when they don’t want to offer that much to Smith?
by jae on
Jul 31, 2008 4:26 PM PDT
up
reply
1 recs
+1
A player of J-Rich’s ability and contract size is not easy to move. To be blunt about it, most teams wouldn’t regard that package - a good-but-not-great SG with a big contract - as desirable in a vacuum, let alone worth trading good players for. If anything, it’s surprising that we were able to get as much as we did for the guy.
by onlxn on
Jul 31, 2008 4:48 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Also who knows if there was any truth to the story.
That the warriors and bobcats had the deal to trade J-Rich for the eighth pick before hand. It was suppose to be part of getting KG. When the pick came up the Bobcats could not get a hold of the Warriors in time again, to find out exactly who they were suppose to pick and so they took Wright. As the story goes the T-Wolves were not happy with that, because that is not who they wanted. That killed the deal with the T-Wolves for the Warriors. The Warriors then got stuck with Wright and tried to spin it to everyone the best they could.
by The Golden One on
Jul 31, 2008 11:08 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
ditto again
i hate ignorant fans..good counter
by IndubitableBayAreaGM on
Aug 1, 2008 1:25 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
i know the era has passed
but i do miss J Rich! We didn’t use the $10 mil, so that sucks but we’ll have to give B Wright another year before we really evaluate this trade. he barely played last year and he’s still what 19 y/o maybe 20 y/o
by GoldenStateDubtronic on
Jul 31, 2008 4:14 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
we did use the exception in a manner of speaking
would u have rather used it on a team giving a 10 million dollar player away (probably crap) and not have the money to sign maggette? or use it and not have the cap room? the only possible was camby and we obviously could have since they gave them to the clips. but the we would have had an aging team assuming they did it before baron opted out
by IndubitableBayAreaGM on
Aug 1, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
wow. That vote is deadlocked right now.
50% agree. 49% disagree.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
by kenntoe on
Jul 31, 2008 4:56 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Enough JRich already. He wasn;t leader and my
grandma can dribble the rock better than does. He has two left feet and hands of stone!
by smearthebeard on
Jul 31, 2008 4:56 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
ahhh
you want to try to D him up. He probably dunk on you with ease. Many ppl forgotten he rarely take it to rim since he undergo knee surgery.
by warriorfan4life on
Aug 1, 2008 1:19 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Steinmetz is not the menza...
of NBA basketball or the Warriors. For some reason ->he needed the attention ->digs up buried bones -> relives the past. Matt, there are 12 step programs out there that can help!
by streetballer on
Jul 31, 2008 5:04 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
haha
even the Warriors don’t like Steinmetz. Will he be conspicuously missing from the sidelines this year?
"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy
by olympicmike on
Jul 31, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I voted no...
but totally expected the yes to be the favorite in that poll. I’m extremely surprised that its still basically 50/50
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 31, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
i'm even more surprised that there are 1062 votes
are there really that many different ppl going through here in a span of 18 hrs, half of which should have been dedicated to sleep and daily commute?
or are some obsessed individuals voting over and over again…..........................................................
by the evil monkey on
Aug 1, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
well
i voted 1000 times, 500 times yes, 500 times no.
by Fantasy Junkie on
Aug 1, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Yea I voted for Super Cr3w last night!
Screw Boogie Bots! Ouch!
by Tony.psd on
Aug 1, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Forget SUPER CR3W!
FANNY PACK KILLED IT! Man… Super Cr3w is overrated and highly messy. They shoulda never made it past Supreme Soul
by Mr. Monday Night on
Aug 2, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
500 times yes, 500 times no.
I only got in 5 no votes before it cut me off?
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Aug 1, 2008 2:05 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
lol
the board is spilit… i think if jrich was still here we would never had the monta blossom like we had this year and maybe monta would have been cheaper this year.
by saintdee on
Jul 31, 2008 5:45 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Like Steinmetz wrote, Monta was the Most Improved Player with JRich on the team.
by Fantasy Junkie on
Jul 31, 2008 6:14 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
But Monta won that award because J-Rich broke his hand and got a ton of minutes during the year. It’s not like he and J-rich were really feeding off each other the whole year or anything.
by Nellieball on
Jul 31, 2008 6:23 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
we did that to bukie
the was he started off i thought we was gonna have to pay him crazy jack to keep him
by IndubitableBayAreaGM on
Aug 1, 2008 1:30 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Well here's the thing,
Had the Richardson trade never happened and this team failed, everyone on here would have bitched and moaned about not going after Kevin Garnett hard enough, not even thinking about Brandan Wright. If it would have been a success and the Warriors made the playoffs, everyone on here would be talking about shipping off Al Harrington because he’s _ and _.
As much as I’d love to still see Richardson in a Warrior jersey this past season, I’m happy about the general direction of this team. Rebuilding happens, but our team hasn’t been this young since the Arenas/Richardson/Jamison days. Is it August 8 yet?
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 31, 2008 5:51 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
You can't put a price on heart
First let me say that this is not a knock on Brandan Wright. He wasn’t the problem with this trade. Normally when you make a trade, you try to get back an asset that is equal or greater to the one that you are giving away. The Warriors trade away the heart of the team. They still had Baron Davis but the true “Warrior” was Jason Richardson. They traded him away in exchange for Brandan Wright and then let Brandan sit on the bench for pretty much the whole season. If they kept Richardson, would he has sat on the bench the whole season? Of course not. Jason would have played his heart out every game the same way he did for the Warriors since his rookie season. So basically, the Warriors traded him away for the Mid Level Exception (which they didn’t use) and a player that Nelson didn’t add to the rotation. They got nothing in exchange for the symbol of the team. Walk through Oracle Arena during any game last season and I bet you would have seen as many Jason Richardson jerseys as you would have seen Baron Davis jerseys. He was loved by all the fans. He was the symbol of the Warriors teams just as the Bald Eagle is the symbol of the United States. You can’t put a value on that.
The only excuse I can give Warriors management for making that trade is that they were attempting to clear salary space to make a run at making a trade for Kevin Garnett. If the Warriors had managed to get KG, we wouldn’t be talking about Jason Richardson now. Heck, we might be celebrating a championship. But it didn’t happen. Now Baron Davis bailed on us for the Clippers. If we still had Jason, we wouldn’t have bothered signing Maggette. Maggette came in at a lower price than Jason Richardson but to be honest there is something about Jason that I would rather have, HEART.
by NBA on
Jul 31, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
f we still had Jason, we wouldn’t have bothered signing Maggette.
Bothered? We wouldn’t have been able. If Davis left and the Richardson trade had never happened, we wouldn’t have had cap room.
by jae on
Jul 31, 2008 11:06 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
IT'S OVER AND DONE WITH!!
I’ve actually been an active reader for this site and a crazy dedicated warrior fan for a while now and I usually don’t post comments but this thread has split this whole forum and half and I don’t think it’s neccessary…... I just want to say…..
GET OVER IT!!!!! nothing we do now can undo everything that has happened already!!! We all loved JRich and we always will but everyone should have moved on by now even Matt Steinmetz and I don’t even know why he’s still bringing this up. All we should care about now is how to get to this season’s playoffs and nothing about JRich!!! Let’s just take this thread out!! IT’S POINTLESS!!!!
by Pjaysee on
Jul 31, 2008 6:03 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Did you have an Egg McMuffin...
...or Sausage McMuffin with egg this morning for break fast? :-P
by Tony.psd on
Jul 31, 2008 8:48 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
yes, it was good trade
yes, it’s too early to judge this trade, but Wright will be here for a long time and looks like he’ll be a good player.
Didn’t the W’s win more games last year than the season before?
Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious.
by Kobe on
Jul 31, 2008 6:25 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Why the hell did we trade for Baron Davis???
Keep talking about J-Rich if you want, but trading him meant breaking up the whole ‘We Believe’ squad just so we can keep Monta. There was no point of having Baron Davis on this team in the first place if we were just going to end up saving money for Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins to get pwned by guys like LeBron, Oden, Paul etc. in the future.
We waited 12 years to make the damn playoffs and we finally put together a GREAT team. We acquired Baron Davis who was the best point guard we had since Tim Hardaway, we brought Don Nelson back to lead the team even further, and we added key pieces in Stephen Jackson and Al Harrington. What did that lead to? It lead to the team going 16-5 in the games they played together and they ended up pulling off an upset and going to the 2nd round. Our team was good enough to be one of the last eight teams remaining out of the 30 overall. Do you know how great that was? Isn’t that the success that we all have been waiting 12+ years for??
What do we do after? We trade Richardson, and then we let Baron walk. All because we value Monta and Biedrins so much. So yeah, 12 seasons just so we can get a tease huh? We wait 12 seasons, and then the organization teases us by getting Baron and acts like we were working towards a championship. But no, that was just to get us excited for a while. Now we’re rebuilding AGAIN with Monta, Biedrins, Randolph, Wright, etc. Ok, lets wait another 3 years before we become one of the top teams in the league again, but even then we’re still going to get owned by guys like Greg Oden, Derrick Rose, Dwyane Wade, Carmelo Anthony, LeBron James, Kevin Durant, Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Andrew Bynum, Al Jefferson etc. etc. etc. all of them will be in their prime by then.
We were already a top 8 team in the league in 06-07, we were just one big player away from smelling that championship but instead we decide to break everyone up since we all love Monta so much. The Brandan/Jason trade better be worth it, we better win a championship within the next 10 years; we could have gone pretty damn close to winning one had we kept the group together. Don Nelson didn’t come back from retirement just so he can lead a bunch of 20 year olds.
Don’t even tell me to “move on”, because quite frankly you don’t make a trade like the Jason Richardson one and become MUTE about it. Matt Steinmetz is simply reviewing the OUTCOME of a trade, yet hella people are getting mad at him for doing so. So what, we’re supposed to make a big trade and never talk about how things ended up turning out?.I’m not just going to be all on Chris Mullin’s nuts and be okay with whatever direction he leads the team to.
Don’t get me wrong though. I can move on, since there’s no reason why someone couldn’t be able to move on while reminiscing at the same time. I will just be patient with this whole Monta Ellis thing, he’s a future all-star in my eyes and hopefully he leads us to a championship; but damn, we just broke up a great team because of him and Andris. That team was capable of doing great things, they just needed one more piece and they would have taken over. Especially with Don Nelson ready to retire again after one more season. Enough with the low expectations, we shouldn’t be accustomed to losing anymore, in my eyes the 2007 Warriors could have developed into a championship contender if Chris Mullin kept the main guys together. All we needed was a dominant low post presence and we would have been crazy.
I’m 100% sure that if Chris Mullin was the GM of the Boston Celtics, he would have kept Al Jefferson to work towards the future, instead of getting key players to win a championship. It’s whatever now, we’re all on Monta’s nuts hopefully that guy brings a championship to the Bay.
by Five Ten Entertainment on
Jul 31, 2008 8:57 PM PDT
reply
1 recs
and then we let Baron walk. All because we value Monta and Biedrins so much.
Your logical connections leave a bit to be desired here. Baron walked on his own accord. He didn’t walk because we valued Monta or Biedrins. He walked because he wanted to play in LA, he thought he could play there with an overall better situation, and they offered him more money than his fragile history sanely warranted. The deal that he got there wouldn’t have been wise with or without Biedrins or Monta in the equation. Paying as much as the Clippers did for Baron is a big risk, and it’s a big risk independent of any other players on or not on the roster.
We were already a top 8 team in the league in 06-07, we were just one big player away from smelling that championship but instead we decide to break everyone up since we all love Monta so much.
(Your logically impaired connection about breaking up the team due to some Monta lovefest ignored for the ridiculousness that it is) how exactly did you expect to get that “one big player”?
by jae on
Jul 31, 2008 11:13 PM PDT
up
reply
6 recs
in my eyes the 2007 Warriors could have developed into a championship contender if Chris Mullin kept the main guys together. All we needed was a dominant low post presence and we would have been crazy.
I think this pretty much sums it up. Yes, that team was probably a dominant low post presence away from being really, really good. Most teams are. That’s not the missing piece for a great team—that’s the most important piece. To say you’re a great big man away is basically just to say that you’re not an outright terrible team.
To commit to that ‘06-’07 would’ve meant capping out. It would’ve meant cashing in all our chips for a team that was clearly not championship-level, and not particularly close… it was a team that could sneak into the second round with the right matchup (which it got), but would get owned by any time with a strong inside player (which it did). Why would you go all in for a team like that?
The team we have now doesn’t seem likely to be championship-level or even particularly close… it may be a bit worse than the Baron/J-Rich version would’ve been. The franchise is still in much better position now, because our roster consists almost exclusively of desirable pieces. You’re not going to be able to trade for a “dominant low-post presence” with commodities like Jason Richardson… you might get one with younger, more intriguing commodities like Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins. We’re now in a position to make some noise, the next time a superstar becomes available. In the meantime, we’ll see what our youngsters can do… I’m betting they can do a fair amount.
Our team was good enough to be one of the last eight teams remaining out of the 30 overall. Do you know how great that was?
In terms of fun, in terms of emotion, in terms of excitement, it was incredible.
Objectively speaking, though, reaching the second round of the playoffs isn’t that much of an achievement. In the last five years, 19 of the 30 teams in the league have gotten at least as far as the second round. It seemed like an amazing achievement to us, after thirteen years in the wilderness, but it’s not, really. It’s not proof that you’re super-close to a ring… it’s not proof that you’re a piece away. Mullin and company could have been bewitched by this second-round team and sold the farm to keep all the important pieces around, but they didn’t—to their credit, they realized it wasn’t actually a good enough core to commit to. The J-Rich trade didn’t lose us a ring… it lost us a first-round playoff exit, if that.
Let’s not cheapen the memory of the We Believe squad by falsely ascribing greatness to them. They thought they were great, and that’s what made them so charming… they were fun and crazy, and they pulled off a huge upset. But they weren’t a team that was going to get anywhere near a championship.
by onlxn on
Jul 31, 2008 11:33 PM PDT
up
reply
5 recs
Onlxn, man
The quaility of your writing and thinking seriously makes me envious. It’s like, if I had a machine that magically transcribed my thoughts exactly into perfect, smooth English prose, while purging them of any trace of snark and meanness, it might resemble the typical comment you post here.
I think you may be the “dominant Big Man” GSoM been lacking…
Sign ^^^^ !!
by Sleepy Freud on
Aug 1, 2008 4:30 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Ha, kind words, Sleepy, but really the difference between thee and me is that you have the decency not to ramble every time you post. I am the Declercq of this board, at best.
by onlxn on
Aug 2, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
+1
They thought they were great, and that’s what made them so charming… they were fun and crazy, and they pulled off a huge upset. But they weren’t a team that was going to get anywhere near a championship
and this was the main reason why 07/08 season started 0-6
build a team & destroy the roof
by Lat We N Trash on
Aug 1, 2008 4:44 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
No it wasn’t. Missing Stack Jack was the main reason, and everyone knows it.
by Amoc on
Aug 1, 2008 11:34 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
nope
in one interview Biedrins said that team was just too self confident after 06/07 PO
actually Warriors played without Jack even later in season -as i remember they won BOS without SJax -so IMO missing SJax was just one of the reasons -but not main
build a team & destroy the roof
by Lat We N Trash on
Aug 2, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
If I had the ability or knew how to rec a post, I would rec this one.
I agree, a lot of the argument was hypothetical about the team+J-Rich. We ended on such a high note, we believed that the hot version of the team was what it was. Monta Ellis shot 60+% in a month, but that doesn’t mean that he is always going to play like that. Everyone peaked at the right time for us that year.
Don’t people remember how we went 18-10 with Baron Davis the first year we got him? Expectations were sky high for the next season, because it seemed that once we acquired Davis we started winning. Well, what was our record the next season?
And we played a lot of winning teams at the end of the year in 06-07, but how do we know they were trying as hard as we were. Dallas rested all their guys against us. When we played Utah we won 126-102, and they outrebounded us 49-45. How the hell does Utah only outrebound us by 4 in a game they have to win? The answer is that they didn’t have to win it.
by belilaugh on
Aug 1, 2008 10:18 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
You can "rec" posts
FYI. Click on “actions” then on “rec”.
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Aug 1, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
up
reply
6 recs
Wow, razor thin margins...
I guess, as always, the deciding votes will be coming from Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida…
Sign ^^^^ !!
by Sleepy Freud on
Jul 31, 2008 8:59 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Wow, razor thin margins...
Yep, that’s the downside of voting, half the voters always vote as if they have below average intelligence.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jul 31, 2008 9:35 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Haha
Why does Skeptic seriously crack me up every day?
by Atma Brother ONE on
Jul 31, 2008 9:47 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
The crux of it is that we all believe we're in the "above average" half
I know I am! ;-)
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Aug 1, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
We won’t really know if this was a good trade until we see how BWright pans out. If he reaches his potential it was a great trade. If he doesn’t…i don’t know.
by jakeaco on
Jul 31, 2008 10:48 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
My favorite part
What kind of banana is Brandan? HAHA!!! I love that picture and the idea. Snaps, Matt.
Well… I hope he’s a green banana.
I am going to take a pretty firm stance against Steinmetz on this one though:
GENERAL COMMENT OR COMPLAINT: When you get right down to it, Richardson is a third or fourth banana.REBUTTAL: I don’t disagree with that. But I don’t think Brandan Wright is going to be any better kind of banana.
Umm… In what scenario are you going to be happy about paying a “3rd or 4th banana” 51M for 4 years (what JRich was due when he was traded)? That’s 14.4M in his last year… as a 3rd or 4th banana? Sorry, not buying it. Maggette’s getting less money over 5 years instead of 4, and people are still calling him overpaid. That makes JRich extra overpaid. Imagine the crying people here would do if we hired a jumpshot focused SG at 51M/4 years this offseason.
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Aug 1, 2008 8:53 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
# 23- CJ Watson !!!
Giving JRich’s number to CJ the very next year was low class.The Warriors brass could have suggested another number.Wait at least a year before giving it so unceremoniously to another player ! And the “Boy’s are back in Town” video montage with JRich and Webber was WEAK !! Jason deserved his OWN video tribute !!
Dr. Jeff
by JEFFSJAZZ on
Aug 1, 2008 10:23 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Marcus Williams
is wearing 5 this year.
by RubbaDubStyle on
Aug 2, 2008 12:24 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I think they showed the video or JRich and Webber together to avoid the embarassment of Webber getting booed, or at the very least the embarassment of the player they traded getting more cheers than the player they aquired. Not everyone was thrilled with the Webber deal.
I loved JRich, but still think trading him was the right move.
Adoptive father of howtheyscored. The beatings will begin momentarily.
by Goofus on
Aug 4, 2008 3:57 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
k which of you cheaters are voting twice
as big as GSoM is, we dont have 1200+ active voters
by dso on
Aug 1, 2008 3:13 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Sitemeter
If you look at our sitemeter there are 8500 views per day and 26,000 hits.
http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s22goldenstateofmind
What that translates into as far as unique visits, I’m not sure. But there are quite a few people who do read the site each day. 1200 doesn’t surprise me.
Or maybe people are just deleting their cookies or logging on from multiple computers because this vote is so important.
by Fantasy Junkie on
Aug 1, 2008 4:20 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs


