REPORT: MAGGETTE AGREES TO DEAL WITH WARRIORS
Sorry no source yet but I was watching ESPN news and Marc Stein just reported that Maggette agreed to midlevel(7-8 mil) deal with Warriors. Stein also reported the Warriors aren't done in the free agent market.
I'm assuming that Iguodala is out of the Warrior's sight. This will be a good alternative to Iggy and for a pretty good price. But my question is that I wonder if Maggette would play at the 2 or 3. I would say he's an upgrade over Azubuike.
Current Lineup:
PG: Ellis, Watson
SG: Maggette, Belinelli
SF: Jackson, Randolph
PF: Harrington, Wright, Hendrix
C: Biedrins, Perovich
I'd say that lineup is still mediocre. Throw J-Smoov in there and call it a day.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
9 recs |
269
comments
Comments
here's a link
by b33b0 on Jul 8, 2008 6:28 PM PDT 0 recs
Hey Nellieball - what do you mean REC THIS THREAD?
We moved immediately with an offer sheet to Turiaf? There was more…and quickly!
by streetballer on
Jul 9, 2008 10:10 AM PDT
up
0 recs
He means recommend
At the bottom of the original article there is a line saying:
Email|Print|Flag|Rec|
Click on Rec to recommend it.
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Jul 9, 2008 10:26 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Maggette
Not bad. Now let’s resign Monta and AB and pick up Hinrich.
by GoldenStateDubtronic on Jul 8, 2008 6:30 PM PDT 1 recs
Won't happen
Monta is your starter .. why waste money on a PG that is aback up?
by pree on
Jul 8, 2008 6:34 PM PDT
up
0 recs
why not?
Monta shouldn’t waste his time handling and distributing…he needs to concentrate on getting buckets..2 years ago: Hinrich 16pts, 6 asst. why wouldn’t you want that?
by GoldenStateDubtronic on
Jul 8, 2008 6:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Because of his contract
I should back off of “won’t happen” .. I just don’t think it should
by pree on
Jul 8, 2008 7:06 PM PDT
up
0 recs
why waste money on a PG
Because Montay is a 2 guard. Why should we hafta suffer thru watching him play point when he does fine at 2 ?
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jul 8, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
**FINGERS CROSSED**
If this is true, this better not be “IT”!!! I think MAGGETTE is a good player, but this move to pay him over $6 million per year can’t be the ONLY move they make!
Is this another knee-jerk reaction to losing out on BRAND? What does this mean to making a run at J-SMOOTH?
Scouting report on MAGGETTE has been he’s injury-prone and a mediocre defender! Greeeeat…just what we need! scratches head
Keep ‘em comin’ MULLY!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jul 8, 2008 6:33 PM PDT 0 recs
LA Times has it now too
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-clippers9-2008jul09,0,7626268.story
I don’t like this deal very much. If we were going to pay $50 million for Maggette (which is overpaying for this guy), why not something like the $65 million the Clips gave to Baron? Baron is MUCH better than Maggette and meets a need.
Bay Area Warriors fan currently at UCLA.
by Yoyo on Jul 8, 2008 6:34 PM PDT 0 recs
Well, so much for waiting. With Elton Brand officially out of the picture, league sources told the Chronicle that the Warriors have reached an agreement with free agent forward Corey Maggette on a five-year deal worth up to $50 million.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/warriors/author?blogid=39&auth=155
Isn’t 50 mil over 5 yrs a little too much for Maggette?? I guess this means Dubs won’t have a chance of landing Josh Smith.
by nautica on Jul 8, 2008 6:35 PM PDT 0 recs
It starts at 6 mil so we still have 10 mil to use on a free agent.
by joestar on
Jul 8, 2008 6:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
how about luring Baron away and signing him. He only reached a verbal agreement and now the Clipps are going to suck.
I am Cameron Wood and this is my son and business partner CW Culberson.
by camwoody on Jul 8, 2008 6:37 PM PDT 0 recs
Awful, awful deal
$10 M per for fucking Maggette?!!!!!! So, instead of Josh Smith even being “on the Warriors radar” for around $12 M per but instead we sign fucking Maggette for $10 M per?!! Worst decision ever (OK, oher than Foyle’s contract).
by Lifelong on Jul 8, 2008 6:39 PM PDT 0 recs
Starts at 6 mil foo read the damn posts. We have 10-12 for J. Smith.
J.Smith+Maggetter > BD
by joestar on
Jul 8, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
up
0 recs
what post says only 6 mil?
sfgate says 10 mil. the espn article say more than the midlevel.
by DustyG on
Jul 8, 2008 7:32 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Its a specific type of payment plan
He gets gradual increments I believe each year
Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.
by jeppalepala on
Jul 8, 2008 8:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
That would mean
His last year in contract would be getting paid 14Mil it is a 2Mil pay increase I could be wrong though.
1 6Mil
2 8Mil
3 10Mil
4 12Mil
5 14Mil
If I am wrong i will respond with a D'Oh
by StephenO4 on
Jul 8, 2008 8:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Those numbers are certainly wrong. That’s a raise larger than allowed by the CBA.
by jae on
Jul 9, 2008 9:11 AM PDT
up
0 recs
D'OH
seen later on your other post it was around 8.5Mil or something around the ball park
If I am wrong i will respond with a D'Oh
by StephenO4 on
Jul 9, 2008 11:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
that's actually worse b/c
that means towards the end when he’s 33 we’re going to be paying him $14 mill when he should basically be playing a stackhouse on the mavs role on a contender.
by the evil monkey on
Jul 8, 2008 9:30 PM PDT
up
0 recs
NOT NECESSARILY
you can put a positive spin on his last year being a very valuable trade commodity in the tune of $14 million dollars to a team that wouldn’t mind having MAGGETTE for 1 year and having his contract expire after!
by scottiepimppen on
Jul 9, 2008 1:17 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Financials
I just wanna know what the terms of the deal is. Reports everywhere are conflicting
by FHWANG007 on Jul 8, 2008 6:40 PM PDT 0 recs
Man I am not a Maggete fan. He has great physical skills, but he plays selfish. He just isn’t a winner. Never had it at Duke when he left early and never had it obviously with the Clippers.
by nuttinbutnet on Jul 8, 2008 6:40 PM PDT 0 recs
i agree. plus if where is he gonna play? if he starts, monta basically has to be our point guard and i don’t think he’s ready yet. also, i think we’re overpaying him when younger guys with more upside like iggy and josh smith are around.
by jakeaco on
Jul 8, 2008 9:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
They are resticted.
So if you offer them contracts you have to wait for their teams to decide to match up to 7 days. At the end of that period there teams match and then no one is left.
Thats why Maggette was the choice to go after.
It also still gives them chance to do more before resigning ellis and bieds if they want.
by The Golden One on
Jul 8, 2008 9:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Excellent...
thats an okay starting lineup, now get rid of harrington, pick up a decent pf and your set…
by MeTaLLiCs0naTaS on Jul 8, 2008 6:40 PM PDT 0 recs
are you kidding
5 year 50 mil, thats fucking terrible. put an extra 10 mil in there and throw it j-smooves way, sheesh. i like maggette, but i like josh smith WAYYYYYYYY more
by Thoang77 on Jul 8, 2008 6:42 PM PDT 0 recs
Atlanta matches that
They probably still match it if you throw in an extra 20M.
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Jul 9, 2008 6:32 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Absolute Disaster in Retrospect
1. Anything more than 40 mil to maggette is crazy. nobody was going to offer him more than 25 mil (Mid-level)
2. Now we cannot get a ball handler. Ellis, Jax, and Maggette must start. We would go ultra small.
by FHWANG007 on Jul 8, 2008 6:44 PM PDT 0 recs
we are not spurs
in other words, we have to pay more to lure decent players because we can’t entice them with chance of title. i like the signing because we still have 10 mil to a solid backup pg like heinrich. if we got jsmith we’d have to pay much more.
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on Jul 8, 2008 6:48 PM PDT 0 recs
I konw....
Paying mmore is one thing…paying double is idiocy
We can’t spend “10 mil” because we still need to resign biedrins and ellis
by FHWANG007 on
Jul 8, 2008 6:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
no no no...
your numbers are wrong. They can still resign both guys and sign one more.
by mikey J on
Jul 8, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The numbers are really going to be 4 years/ 36M
Unless he becomes and all star, we’re trading him as an expiring contract in the offseason before the 5th year.
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Jul 9, 2008 6:34 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Not a bad start...
still got 40 mil left in cap since he was signed for MLE. Assuming Monta/Andris take half, i say we gotta push for Smith. He was made for Nellieball and will be apart of our young core. A definate upgrade over Al IMO.
by Spee-D on Jul 8, 2008 6:51 PM PDT 0 recs
Not
He didn’t sign for MLE. Three reports so far: One says OVER MLE. Two say 5yrs 50 mil.
by DustyG on
Jul 8, 2008 7:49 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Trade with the Blazers
They have four point guards.
Jared Bayless- Can’t have him.
Steve Blake- Pure PG who is a really solid role player. Great 3 point shooter.
Sergio RodrÃguez- Talented passer who likes to run. Not a great shooter , but he is still really young. He does stuff like this a lot.
Petteri Koponen- The Suns really want him. 6’4 pg who likes to pass. He still lives in Finland and is only 20 years old.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on Jul 8, 2008 6:55 PM PDT 0 recs
also
they have Rudy Fernandez coming… they have way too many players and their GM loves to trade
It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year
by gsw4life on
Jul 8, 2008 7:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Just to clarify
Rudy is a 2. Yes..we do have too many players.
President of the Petteri Koponen fan club.
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jul 9, 2008 12:34 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Sergio
Would be a great fit for Nellie ball. And he is unhappy in Portland.
President of the Petteri Koponen fan club.
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jul 9, 2008 12:34 AM PDT
up
0 recs
what are the chances
Hey guys, what do you think the chances are of the Warriors re-signing Kelenna?
talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish
by starry night on Jul 8, 2008 6:56 PM PDT 0 recs
With Barnes and Pietrus gone.
and allowed to go over the cap for your own players. I believe he will be back.
by The Golden One on
Jul 8, 2008 9:21 PM PDT
up
0 recs
stuff like this
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pae5GLy-9Zc
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on Jul 8, 2008 6:56 PM PDT 0 recs
This is kind of an odd move.
I don’t like moving Monta to the point. Monta is probably more effective playing off the ball than being our starting point… Our lineup looks ok on paper, but our team still needs shooters, leadership, and defense. I’m not sure Maggette fills any of those needs. From a financial standpoint, Maggette is cheaper, but he might not be the best fit for our team. Josh Smith might have fit our system better than Maggette. We’ll see how it works out.
by The Daydreamer on Jul 8, 2008 6:56 PM PDT 0 recs
Maggette fits our needs...
to an certain extent. Hes a big 2 maybe 3 would can get rebound and most importantly, doesnt rely on his jump shots. I like this move because he has a nose for the basket and can draw fouls, something that the Warriors lacked.
Interesting that he settled for only the MLE when he clearly wanted more. I wonder if his gunna get traded
by Spee-D on
Jul 8, 2008 7:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Not Bad
still rather have J Rich though, I just hope Wright breaks out soon and I can move finally on from losing him
by TonyDelk on Jul 8, 2008 7:02 PM PDT 0 recs
Trade with the Pistions.
Anyone think this signing was just to get Billups from the Pistons? I was reading on hoopsworld that a trade might happen with Harrington but there is no way the Pistons would make that deal and they have been really interested in Maggette.
by RuCuS on Jul 8, 2008 7:05 PM PDT 0 recs
Isn’t there some rule about not being able to trade players you have just signed? Like a 6th month period? Or is that just with drafted players signed?
PREE we need you!
by Nellieball on
Jul 8, 2008 7:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mixed
His style doesn’t fit nellieball too much since he draws fouls like a mutha but we need that. He’s already a better FT shooter than a lot of our guys. I’m intrigued to see him play under Nellie though.
by disguy on Jul 8, 2008 7:18 PM PDT 0 recs
Don't hate on maggette
First, he seems like a guy who would flourish under nelson’s system and be so happy to not be under Dunleavy’s stilted offense with too many set plays that it would give him new life.
Second, we are a score first team – we may want a guy who plays great defense and shuts guys down and slows the other team’s offense – but nellie wouldn’t play him. maggette is a scorer and with baron’s points leaving we need a guy who can score from anywhere on the floor like baron did- Maggette can
Third, people are calling for leadership and defense – I think SJax brings that
Finally, unlike maggette, Josh Smith will think this is HIS team – not Monta’s team. Could cause trouble down the road.
Maggette isn’t perfect but I doubt we could get him by paying much less.
Warrior fan for life - where we are "always just a big man away" from total domination
by buttafingas on Jul 8, 2008 7:21 PM PDT 0 recs
Maggette also gets to the line a ton
He shoots at a high FG% for his position and scores efficiently. He’s an offensive machine.
by Dubs fan in Boston on
Jul 9, 2008 6:42 AM PDT
up
0 recs
If this is a six million per year contract like some are saying, its a pretty good move (only reservation is that it probably puts us higher in the lottery and probably doesn’t let a guy like Buike shine, but you never know)
If it’s a ten million per year contract like some are saying, WTF ARE YOU DOING MULLIN? I’ve defended your moves a lot but if we are giving an injury prone twenty nine year old 3rd/4th option player 50 million, why couldn’t we just have given Baron, an injury prone twenty nine year old 1st/2nd option player, 65 million? Not to mention Baron is a PG, the position we don’t have, while Maggette is an SG, the position we do.
If it’s 8 mil then I don’t really know. I guess I’ll wait until he signs to judge it, but I’ve got all the responses ready.
by belilaugh on Jul 8, 2008 7:21 PM PDT 0 recs
ESPN confirms it.
A starting salary above the mid-level exception, which is expected to approach $6 million.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3479117
I wish I knew the exact terms. $6-7M and I’m pretty thrilled. That’s roughly what MP2 got from the Magic. $10M and I’m less than thrilled.
Now bring us JSmooth and let the Left Coast Movement begin!!!!
Sign ^^^^ !!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 8, 2008 7:23 PM PDT 0 recs
hopefully midlevel
if we got him for the midlevel i would go crazy. if we got him for a little above the midlevel i would be excited. if we got him for 10 mil a year, i would be pretty disappointed…
by gogoldenbears on Jul 8, 2008 7:27 PM PDT 0 recs
Word
I think you are right on, contractwise…but I’m not high on Maggette
by DustyG on
Jul 8, 2008 7:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
lol at the Clips
in the span of a few minutes, they find out they just lost their two best players from last season. To all the people clamoring for Josh Smith: let it go, we’re not getting him, ATL will match any offer. Maggette is a good pick-up imo. He’s a guy that can score in a multitude of ways and can create his own offense. And it seems like he keeps getting better unlike BD whose best years are behind him. There’s a reason why teams like the Celtics and Spurs were wanting this guy. Now Mullin needs to pull a Billy Beane and trade for a decent PG
by Money Ball on Jul 8, 2008 7:30 PM PDT 0 recs
the celtics and spurs
would have gotten him for the MLE. If that’s what the warriors signed him for it would’ve been great, but it’s not.
by kinetic on
Jul 8, 2008 7:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
we gotta spend more
Obviously, we have to spend more for a player like Maggette because we can’t guarantee that we’ll be contending for a championship. Seriously, who would you like to give the money to instead? BD’s gone, Brand wanted to go to Philly. All that’s left is Maggette and a bunch of scrubs. It’s very difficult to sign a restricted free agent because their team can match any offer. If we don’t spend the money, it means we’re definitely rebuilding this year. This move shows that Mullin is trying to contend this year.
by Money Ball on
Jul 8, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
up
0 recs
this signing
is dumb as hell. He’s signing for OVER the MLE, not like some of you are saying. Maggette is a good player, a great sixth man, but that’s it. He’s a 6th man! We already have a good scoring option in Monta, Maggette isn’t filling a need for the warriors and he’s being WAY OVERPAID.
Seriously though, if they’re willing to give Maggette a 5-year 50 million dollar deal, why didn’t they just resign baron. I have absolutely zero faith in Mullin.
by kinetic on Jul 8, 2008 7:32 PM PDT 0 recs
The Warriors would have ended up
with nothing then
There is no plan B
The restricted guys are long shots at best and Maggette would be gone
they had to over pay a bit
by SFzig on
Jul 8, 2008 7:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Uh
You mean nothing besides what we already have, and what we could do through trades, right?
And it’s not a given that we couldn’t/can’t get anyone else.
by DustyG on
Jul 8, 2008 7:43 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Of course its not a given
trade who?
Sign who
Wishes don’t get you much
All I am saying is they had to make a move now. Its not like Maggette was going to sit around and wait. Its unlikely they were going to get a restricted guy
So we are left with the Al Harrington and a bag of old basketballs sort of wishing
they need depth. They were thin last year and just lost there top scorer. They had to make this deal and it seems it doesn’t preclude a future trade anyway
by SFzig on
Jul 8, 2008 8:07 PM PDT
up
0 recs
And what do we already have?
some young player but do you really want to go into the year with Monta as your first option and captian JAX as your second without a single other proven scorer on the team
by SFzig on
Jul 8, 2008 8:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
No they didn't...
They could have waited until next year. I’ve endured 13 straight years of futility, one more year is not going to phase me.
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 8, 2008 7:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Why do that when they might have a pretty good team
by signing a few guys?
Wait until next for what?
by SFzig on
Jul 8, 2008 8:10 PM PDT
up
0 recs
to offer someone better than Maggette
that kind of money
by Mr. Monday Night on
Jul 8, 2008 9:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
After this year all the money would have been gone anyway because of Ellis, and Biedrens resigning. Might as well use the money while you have.
by joestar on
Jul 8, 2008 11:54 PM PDT
up
0 recs
How the hell...
He scored 22 pt a game last year and he’s a sixth man? He must be playing for a team that scores over 130 pts if that was the case. Hey, I think we might be able to do that.
by joestar on
Jul 8, 2008 11:54 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah
He was a high scoring sixth man. That’s the roles he’s played for years, and why he wanted to go somewhere else.
by DustyG on
Jul 9, 2008 9:57 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Baron's older, history of injuries,
And will break down at some point probably in the next 2 years. Mullin got rid of him before he started having problems. Kinda like hustling someone on that used car before the transmission goes out.
by goldenstatefan on
Jul 9, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Same age
And go look at how many games Maggette has missed over the last few.
by DustyG on
Jul 9, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
up
0 recs
i like
the fact that if we ever cant buy a bucket, all this guy will do is drive to the rim and make two free throws. Whoever mentioned it earlier has the right idea. Maggette could single handedly prevent us from going into a ridiculous shooting slump.
My pictures never show up here, so this is my new Signature
by sloth11 on Jul 8, 2008 7:33 PM PDT 0 recs
Thats it
Who would you rather have taking it? Jax or Maggette
Having Jax as the second option is what we were facing
by SFzig on
Jul 8, 2008 7:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
OK, OK
Everyone calm down. Maggette averaged 22 a game last season. Baron averaged 21. If you plug Maggette in and acquire Hinrich for Harrington, then the scoring will be around the same. You still have 3 20+ scorers with Jack, Maggette, and Monta, providing that Hinrich is there to play point and take the playmaking pressure off Monta. Jack will be a little out of position at the 4, but it’s not like he hasn’t played the 4 in Nellie’s system before. I’m sure there’ll be some lineup shuffling.
Lineup
G Hinrich/Ellis
G Ellis/Maggette
F Maggette/Jackson
F Jackson/Wright
C Biedrins
by dindin on Jul 8, 2008 7:33 PM PDT 0 recs
I like the idea of getting Hinrich,
because monta can NOT play the point and the warriors need a PG that can guard SGs. Jackson at the 4? Really? This team just gets worse and worse.
Also, I’ve heard that the bulls aren’t trading hinrich.
by kinetic on
Jul 8, 2008 7:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I could dig that
But I’d prefer to get ahold of someone like Felton at point—maybe by trading TMNT or Capn
by DustyG on
Jul 8, 2008 7:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
get ahold of someone like Felton at point
“maybe by trading TMNT or Capn?”
The logical one to try to trade for Felton would be Montay. Magette can be our new 2 guard and Felton can play point better than Montay. Why carry two 2 guards instead of one point and one 2?


