Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NBA Power Rankings for Week 2

State of the Team and the Cap, post Maggette

We're still working with rumormill numbers, but as it appears that the cap is set at 58.68 mil, there's some real numbers to work with.  I'm hashing these out on the fly, so some things may be off, but they should be close.

If true that Maggette's deal is 50 mil over 5 years, he's starting at about 8.62 mil for next year.  What this means is that with Pietrus off the books, considering Foyle's buyout salary, penciling in Randolph's rookie deal and a min sal for Hendrix, we're sitting still with more than 9 mil under the cap.  That's what we have to play with. 

Azubuike can be signed independent of the cap, as can Ellis and Biedrins.  I'm gonna guess: 2.2, 9, 9 for the trio next year.  This keeps the team right below the lux tax if they spend the rest of the cap.

Is there something out there worth buying at that price?  Childress? Seems superfluous at this point since he's the same 3 that Maggs is.  I'd assume that Maggs takes the combined Pietrus/Barnes minutes.  I'd also assume that if Wright actually plays, this means the anemic rebounding Jax spends more time at the 2 where he can be the reasonable distributor big defender that we want paired with Monta.

Probably the best use of the cap is to see what happens in trades in the next couple of weeks. Not much worth spending big bucks on in PGs, so that will likely come as a trade. Cap room helps us in being able to make unequal trade, but unfortunately, the piece we'd most likely move is one that has a bigger dollar value.  Still, if Harrington can bring an adequate point guard, the team could be both exciting and productive again next year.

Here's more reality before a hundred all caps posts about Josh Smith:  it was going to take the max to pry Smith from ATL (or Iggy, even after Brand, or Okafor of Deng). 

So 9 mil to spend or swap with.  Anyone see a sub 9 mil point guard on a marginal team that might want to shed salary?

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

6 recs  |  Comment 209 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

dream on

the sixers are contenders now with brand

"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006

by flipgatey3 on Jul 9, 2008 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post

Someone that actually gets the situation were in.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 8:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Luxury tax vs cap space

Jae, fill me in on the cap space please. You say “Azubuike can be signed independent of the cap, as can Ellis and Biedrins. I’m gonna guess: 2.2, 9, 9 for the trio next year. This keeps the team right below the lux tax if they spend the rest of the cap”. Wait ,so there salaries don’t count against salary cap, but actually do against the luxury tax? So even if we sign Beans, Monta, uki and end up with 60-61mil payroll, we will still be techically under the salary cap, and will have to spend some money? I’m confused man

by JustAnotherWarrior on Jul 8, 2008 8:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Your allowed to go over the salary cap for your own players.

So that’s why we have room to sign someone right now and then can wait to resign the others.
If we sign them now then we fill the salary cap and then we are not allowed to over for other teams players.
That’s why are only chance to sign anyone is right now.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Over

the cap for our own players, but we’d still be subject to the luxo tax right?

by phiLthyphiL on Jul 8, 2008 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea thats why you try to hit the middle point.

The salary cap is set at 58 million or so and lux tax is around 70. So they will aim to be under 70 after they resign ellis and bieds.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotcha..

I once was lost but now am found. Did you ever find the link to Pree’s story?

by phiLthyphiL on Jul 8, 2008 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not yet,

wondering if he has a waiting period for an editor or someone to go over it before it’s published on the web.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So explain to me this...

How in the world is Beans and Monta only going to accept $9 & $9 mil each when Maggette got $10 mil?

by Mr. Monday Night on Jul 9, 2008 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because 9M is STARTING

Ending for them would be 13-14. Or something… JAE?

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 9, 2008 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They can get 10% raises since it's their current team

But it’s hard to see Monta moving from his $10m/year demand that ESPN reported earlier this week after this.

So a starting wage of $9m could theoretically lead to a 5 year, $54,945,900 contract (or 6 years, $69,440,490)

Just to have that to work with

by dprodigy19 on Jul 9, 2008 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Precisely. People seem to confuse average with starting salary. The two aren’t the same.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maggette is not getting $10 this year. He’s getting a deal that averages that, but since the price goes up, it’s going to start at 8.62 if indeed it’s 5/50 as reported. Starting Monta and Biedrins at the same point, because we can extend them longer and with bigger raises works out to closer to 11mil a year
over the life of a 6 year contract.

How are they going to accept it? Let’s assume that the starting point offer to Biedrins and Monta is exactly what Maggs gets. They’ll accept such an offer if:

A) they realize that the Warriors can match other offers and they’ll have to find a team with cap space to offer more to drive up the price—such teams aren’t plentiful. Once these offersheets don’t come in, they see that getting 66mil guaranteed (raises and contract length can be higher than what Maggs got) means a pretty respectable lifestyle.

B) they realize the alternative is to play for less money for a year (take a qual offer at ~3.6mil for Biedrins, ~$0.9 mil for Ellis), risk injury, risk security. In Biedrins’ case, it means that to break even, if he waits, he’s got to get a 5 year deal starting at ~10.7 in a year to match accepting a deal starting at 8.62 from the Warriors over the life of the contract. In Ellis’s case, he needs to find a deal starting at 11.1 mil next year to break even or he’s on the short end of the financial sheet by risking a year on the qual offer. Are either scenarios possible? Perhaps. If the Warriors come up with 9mil starting for each this year, then B and E would need to get offers of 11.2 and 11.7 respectively in a year to break even.

C) because when they sit down with agents and negotiators, they aren’t dealing with rabid fans who tend to overvalue home talent. When Maggette’s 20p/36 and 6r/36 over his career are laid out on the table, all of a sudden, coming up with the argument that either are presently signficantly better gets more difficult. Yes, E and B are younger and I consider both of their productivity and potential to be greater and they’re younger so they’ve got a better chance of playing the contracts through at high production, but it’s still not a slam dunk on negotiations to say “but I’m so much better than Maggette” and bargain from that point.

That’s how they accept starting at $9mil.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maggs' #'s are fradulent and a smart agent would know that

Surprise, surprise, a player who sucks at D and can’t facilitate well has a high PER…it’s a terrible stat.

Mullin can throw that out all he wants, but two players who are just as good (or better) and five years younger can command more next offseason. They have ZERO reason besides fear of injury to accept a low-ballish offer.

by dprodigy19 on Jul 9, 2008 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm...

I’m pretty sure his numbers came from the NBA, a pretty impartial institution with respect to keeping statistics. The numbers presented by JAE were 20points/36mins and 6rebounds/36 minutes. He didn’t say anything about PER. You just made that up. Try again.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 9, 2008 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t include PER. I don’t consider it one of the better tools for evaluating players.

The 20 and 6 numbers are real. You can downgrade what they mean, what caused them, but “fradulent” “just like your opinion, man.

But if we’re into commenting on a player “sucking at D” Monta has another hurdle to climb in suggesting that he’s worth more money.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

evaluating players.

Do we really think Magette,Montay, and Dris can be our “Big Three” for 5 years? Is it worth giving them 9 mil to start? or 50 mil for 5 years?

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm. Dunno. I’m not sold on the “big three” philosophy. (Yeah, I know that Nelson’s said that’s what it takes to get a championship. His coaching fingers, ringless as they are indicates that he’s a very good coach who may not really know what it takes; there are several instances of teams that have won without a “big three” as well.) It’s the buzzword of the year because of Boston, but I think the real answer is to consistently try to get more talent, fine tune it when you’re real close and…(this is an important part)...mix in some luck and good fortune.

That said, in general, most teams gets the vast majority of their production from 2 or 3 guys out of the 12 on the active roster at any given time. Eating up half the cap or 40% of the tax threshold (which is what Maggs, Monta, and Biedrins at ~10mil each) means you’re paying the guys who are likely to contribute most of the peak statistical production. That’s a very reasonable ratio, but it means you’re riding them for the bulk of your success.

I did some projections based on some assumptions and general trends and win probabilities from individual player production and I’d put the over under as the team stands now at about 44 wins. Normally, that’s 8th seed. What happened last year in the west was weird.

Mid 40s wins assumes that Wright plays as well as he did last year, but gets a regular 18mpg or so, that injuries are minimal (key players are available 80% of the time for minutes similar to what they got last year) and that the point guard solution is found either in Monta showing ability or league average production comes from some source.

If this doesn’t happen, if there’s a serious injury to a key part or someone implodes and takes the team with him then we’re in 36 win territory. If things go real well, if Wright not only plays more, but substantially improves, if Monta isn’t in the least bit hampered by having more point duties, if everyone stays healthy and we get a moderate surprise from someone, we’re back at 48 to 50 wins. Squeezing more out will be difficult. Not impossible, but difficult.

That’s all some guesswork, but if I were the Vegas over-under comes in at 43, I’d put money above it (and probably will). Much more than that and I’ll keep the money in my pocket since I cannot bring myself to bet against my team.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A Player who sucks at D

Nellie Ball is all about defense. Everyone knows this.

by Jynx-Removing on Jul 9, 2008 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about

Acie Law? I really like his game.

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 8:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He didnt have much stats this year but

4.2 ppg 2 apg in 15 mpg… ehhh I just like him as a point guard and he would be a great addition

What about Sebastian Telfair…

Minnesota has alot of PGs…

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about Daniel Gibson or Delonte West?

I understand they’re both RFAs but will the Caveliers resign both?

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd be happy with either one

Well maybe more Delonte West. I want someone who can ball handle and find the open/cutting man.

by Golden Boy on Jul 8, 2008 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like West. He isn’t a world beater, but he’s solid and has a track record. He’s something of a combo guard too, and I’m not sure that two combo guards makes a point guard, but he’s intriguing. I’ve thought about mentioning him before.

If the Warriors are going after pure backup, a cheap Chris Quinn (who Miami gave a qual offer too and can match offers for, so it’s got to be a trade most likely) isn’t terrible. He’s entirely unexciting, but not terrible. I’m much more positive about Ramon Sessions. His limited minutes really suggest that he’s a capable player. I don’t see how Milwaukee sees him in their plans with Williams (who is acceptable, though overpaid) on board.

by jae on Jul 8, 2008 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or what about...

Louis Williams?

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i like

but he doesn’t “fit” with monta. unless he would be strictly a backup. it would be difficult to play them on the court together.

by gogoldenbears on Jul 9, 2008 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he's as much a pg

as iverson is

"It's not my fault your team's so shitty." -Steve Friend, head coach, Chabot College, to Laney College's head coach, who asked why we scored so many runs after we beat Laney 30-3 in 2006

by flipgatey3 on Jul 9, 2008 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about

Trading for Earl Watson? He’s stepped in to fill Baron’s shoes before and did a decent enough job.

by TempletonPeck on Jul 9, 2008 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

here's a thought

with your projected 9mil of cap left. i think they will go for a big may be james jones or somebody. they then would need to trade al to a team with cap room like the griz for a pg. hinrich cap # is to high. i wouldnt be surprised if jax was the one that got moved though. mully is full of surprises

by Rach on Jul 8, 2008 9:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

but thats just adding another SF... in the mix

We already have Jackson/Maggs/Randolph alternating at those positions I think we better go for a PG… we don’t have one under contract… unless you count Monta

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know but

there is no pg FA that is worth signing so that leaves a big FA to sign. we only have to chips that have we could move al and jax.(mully said BW and marco wont be moved and not sure if they signed the rooks yet but if they did they need to wait 30 days b4 they can be traded) al and jax have tradable contracts but bcuz we would be tight on the cap we would need to get a young pg on the cheap and the team we trade with would need to eat some $$$ cuz we cant. when one or both of these guys go then we wouldnt have a log jam

by Rach on Jul 8, 2008 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just put a bunch of FA pgs I think

are worth signing…

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ehh....

i really dont like what we gave Maggette. Starting at 8.5 mil, aint bad but with the increase, im not so high on. I would have been much more comfortable with 5yr 43mil deal since he has been injury for majority of his NBA career. Dont get me wrong, i love the addition, but i think 5yr 50mil is a lil too much. I hope he can be our 6th man, someone who is instant offense.

by Spee-D on Jul 8, 2008 9:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you man but

whats done is done… or is it?

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

its looks like...

its set in stone. He clearly wanted more money heading into FA and he got it. Only time can tell if hes worth the money. Heck who knows, he can pull a BD; interms of playing 82 games after numerous injury plaged seasons.

by Spee-D on Jul 8, 2008 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea that deal is better.

But we offer that and he goes to the spurs or Celts and just waits for his payday next year. This was the only way to lure him here.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree

sucks but we probably had to overpay whoever we hoped to land

by sam23 on Jul 8, 2008 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

just wish...

the warriors dreamt a little bigger, and maybe thought things out a little further in the future.

i hate to say this but i think the warriors brass is more concerned about losing season ticket holders than building a legit team.

by GState21 on Jul 8, 2008 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think there really concerned over it

But realize at this point there is no one realisticly to bring that will help fill the void. So instead will look to building for the year after.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I was at the Front Office...

My PG wish list would consist of….

RFA Delonte West 9.8 PPG 3.8 APG 44% FG 37% 3PT

RFA Daniel Gibson 7.5 PPG 1.7 APG 43% FG 43% 3PT

RFA Louis Williams 7.2 PPG 2.2 APG 42% FG 35% 3PT

UFA Sebastian Telfair 7.8 PPG 3.8 APG 39% FG 30% 3PT

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 8, 2008 9:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Gibson and Williams

while good players, arent very good fits here. I guess we could use a reliable outside shooter like Gibson, but I dont see he and Monta being able to coexist in a lineup together for more than a couple minutes at a time. Williams seems too similar to Monta. Telfair is intriguing and I dont know about West. Again I’d prefer Livingston, Sessions or Crittenton.

by sam23 on Jul 8, 2008 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ramon Sessions

The Time Is Now! Win Warriors Win!

by ballin on Jul 9, 2008 5:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jannero Pargo

is an unrestricted FA. I’m sure the Hornets want him back, but maybe a good deal will make him thing twice. He was a key player for the Hornets last year and did a great job backing CP3 up. Very quick and a good shooter. Hit some big threes against us in that last game against the Hornets. I’m all for Livingston tho. Another man’s trash is our treasure.

by Captain Jack on Jul 8, 2008 9:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on...

giving Shaun “former #4 pick/next Magic Johnson” Livingston. When you’re tossing out $50 mil for Mags, why not give a guy with one good knee and all the potential in the world a $1-$2 million dollar deal per year for say 2-4 years. it can’t hurt at all.

but… if he does sign, put him with wright, randolph & belinelli is Buike’s nightly weight lifting class

by GState21 on Jul 8, 2008 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Find a Way To Get Billups And Carter To The Bay

I was all for keeping the cap space, sucking horribly, and receiving a high lotto pick, but now that we dipped into the cap to get Maggette, it’s time to go big or go home.

The Nets probably won’t demand much for Carter and will love to clear his contract so they could have a shot at two big time players in the 2010 free agency pool. Teaming Lebron with Bosh or Wade when moving to Brooklyn would be a huge coup.

Carter makes 15 mill this year so how about trading Jack + future picks and absorbing Carter’s 15 mill with our available cap space?

Turn around and call up Joe D and see if he’s at all interested in a Harrington/Billups swap. We might have to spruce up the deal with a future pick or two.

Starting Lineup

Billups
Ellis
VC
Wright
Biedrins

Sixth Man: Maggs

by JimBarnett2KevinGarnett on Jul 8, 2008 9:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

first off....

similar to the carney & booth trade to minny… the warriors should be stacking picks if they are taking contracts off the hands of other teams… I would only trade for carter if we could get yi and/or marcus williams. the warriors still have a huge whole at the point and this year’s point guard free agent class isn’t promising at all.

second, joe D’s only dumb move thus far was picking milicic. besides the numbers not working, harrington for billups would not work straight up. you gotta make the trade enticing for the other team as well… which would be something that looked like this…

harrington + sign & trade beans for billups

a even worst nightmare… harrington, sign & trade beans AND monta for billups, sheed and picks. if the warriors do this, they have completely lost their minds.

by GState21 on Jul 8, 2008 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My guess is they wont doing anything stupid.

Good chance you dont make the playoffs this year anyways in the west. Could always just try out Ellis at the point this year, then trade for a pg during or after the season if it does not work. Don’t have to panic over it.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree with your sentiments...

don’t do anything stupid…

signing maggette to me is almost borderline, but who knows what kinda magic nellie can pull outta him.

I still hope the warriors can try to target a young, unproven point guard not named hinrich and most likely via trade.

by GState21 on Jul 8, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the Maggette signing

only because after we resign ellis and bieds we wont have cap money this year or next. He was the next best in line to come here after Brand, that was realistic. Most restricted (smith, ai, etc) players go back to there own teams and if you make an offer you have to wait a week for them to decide, at that point your out of all options if the old team matches.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing is for sure...

the warriors will be scoring a lot of points next year. They will be pretty much starting 3 2-guards plus a combo of Harrington/Beans/Wright.

“Starting salary at 6 mil?” -ESPN on Maggette’s contract. “He comes pretty cheap”

Insteresting

by GState21 on Jul 8, 2008 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ESPN is wrong I believe.

Starts at 8.5 from what Pree heard and he has close contacts to the warriors.

I don’t see harrington being in a warrior jersey ever again. would be suprised.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The lowest salary he can get for a total 50 in 5 is about 8.6 mil since the CBA limits the size of raises to 8% of base year salary for signing another team’s free agent. I’d be ecstatic if we got him at a start of $6 mil (which is essentially MLE money) but that number is unlikely to be correct.

by jae on Jul 8, 2008 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cap Space

If it is true that the Warriors signed Maggette to a 5 years/$50 million dollar deal, that leaves the Warriors with about 26 million under the cap still (unfortunately, Foyle is still on the books). That is not including the 12 million more the Warriors can spend before hitting the dreaded luxury tax. So the next plan could be… go after one of the restricted, then resign Monta & Beans (& Perovic, Watson, Buike).

What should the Warriors do???

The Maggette deal doesn’t really make much sense, especially at the cost, but it seems the brass is making the “let’s make the playoff” effort but NOT making the “let’s build a contender” pitch. If Maggette is commanding $50 mil, Ellis will at least get $50 mil. Maybe the Warriors can sign and trade one of the two, most likely Beans, for a point guard. But I am lost now… not sure what to think, especially with Nellie in his last year.

by GState21 on Jul 8, 2008 9:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks JAE

I just wanted to say thanks for having a more prominent voice in the Fanpost section this week. It seems like to main page guys are a little to busy to maintain this place at the moment and it has been great to find your analysis and insight into the CBA in all of the threads along with your own posts. You already know I’m a big fan, but I just wanted to say thanks.

As far as the current situation goes I’m a little torn. CM wasn’t on my list of targets and I do think we overpaid a little but I do like Corey’s game and he is super efficient offensively which should be nice. I think we should still be pursuing a possible Hinrich or Billups trade. I’m very curious to see what Management expects from Monta this year. They may very well see how he does with an entire season at the point. He has been surprisingly good so far in his career and I think it would be a worthwhile venture to let him man the point this year. If that’s the case then we don’t have to be in as much of a hurry to land a starter quality point guard but we still need depth at that position.

I’m going to need some time to process what happened tonight, but thanks again for your work.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 10:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

The main page has been dead and any time there is a post its all negative and nothing written without tons of bad feelings toward the team coming out.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SB Nation

I have been reading a lot of the other SB Nation Blogs lately to get a feel for what might happen in free agency and I have to say that we are getting the short end of the stick. I understand that ATMA and the guys are real busy right now but it seems like SB Nation could probably do a lot better. If only Clipper Steve or Matt from Blog-a-Bull were warrior fans.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have said there busy

Which is understandable, but why not then give some regular posters main pages rights. Like athletics nation as done. That would at least keep things running smoothly here. It was truly sad how poor draft day coverage was.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't sweat it

If they are busy that’s good! Do you really have a problem finding the info? It pops right up on my screen, (right on the right side)

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 8, 2008 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea its just lately there isnt that much info

Last year this was the place to come for info on the warriors. At times this year it has been deserted. That’s why I was just suggesting having some help on the main page, to pump some blood in to the place again.

Not complaining there busy, just think they should let some others help to make this site the place to be again.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem is...

that we have a ton of main page contributers but none of them are really into it. I’d love to have someone like JAE who gets into the nuts and bolts of things writing on the main page regularly. I also really miss OZ’s passion for blogging about the Dubs. He was hard to get along with for some but as far as analysis and staying on top of things he was great to have around. I’m hoping that Atma and the boys pick it up a little but I’m starting to get a the felling that we may be under new management soon…

All of the other SB nation blogs that I’ve been reading have had some great articles on frree agency and the teams respective summer league rosters and things like that. I guess I’m just a little jealous of the better coverage that the other teams are getting in the SB Nation network.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What happened to OZ

I never really understood what happened I know why Coma left though

If I am wrong i will respond with a D'Oh

by StephenO4 on Jul 8, 2008 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not positive

Just think they werent happy with the power that went to OZ’s head and the focus he was getting here. They wanted more back towards them. There site, there choice.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what did happen to coma??

i never found out why he left a year ago

by GSwarrior on Jul 8, 2008 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um go to fear the fin

and ask him. Believe he is xcoma because he lost his screen name with the sb nation upgrades. He has been posting over there more often lately.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is why

Changes in GSoM Moderation Duties
Hope i helped

If I am wrong i will respond with a D'Oh

by StephenO4 on Jul 9, 2008 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

someone like JAE who gets into the nuts and bolts of things writing on the main page

JAE is just as informative in the fan posts as he would be on the front page(isn’t he?)
maybe I don’t quite understand the problem? I actually like the approach of the folks running this site, unlike many sports blogs which take themselves too seriously they offer the forum and we all run with it. They are young, open minded , and make me feel good about the area and the sweet Yay area vibe. This place can have a sucky team and still be happy, try that in Dallas!

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 8, 2008 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pree has other things to do...

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 9, 2008 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea so how bout

Jae and olympicmike or Sleepy? (no offense to the dozen or so other really good posters, these guys just seem to be the most consistent)

by sam23 on Jul 9, 2008 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There also is money involved from ads.

My guess is that is the reason they dont want to add any front page people.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The difference

Having to sort through the crap in the FanPosts to find good informative analysis can be tedious (this is much better now that we have a rec feature). Having a more active mainpage with enthusiastic committed talented writers would only be a good thing. We have had some of those some of the time but not all of those all the time if you know what I mean. For days I have been refreshing GSoM to find links to articles that I already read with small cynical blurbs that usually include the words “loser franchise”. Not exactly the level of analysis or entertainment you’d expect from a SB Nation Blog. The community is still great but the Blog itself is lacking.

I don’t want to be too hard on the guys. Atma told me that they are incredibly busy, which I totally understand but it may be time to add someone who has a little more time to spend here.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Done

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea

I’d be in favor of adding any of the guys I listed below as front page contributors.

by sam23 on Jul 8, 2008 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Stop crying about it alright?!?! GO MULLIN.

by jeppalepala on Jul 9, 2008 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Olympicmike

In all honesty I pay much more attention to the posts of you, pree, jae, sleepy, dubsfaninboston, etc, than I do the front page stories anyway so I’m not sweating the lack of participation by Atma and co.

by sam23 on Jul 8, 2008 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

We do have quite a few guys that contribute nicely on a regular basis.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i check

the fanposts before anything else, front page contributions just aren’t as well discussed as the stuff anyone can drop on the side. and the fact that they are discussed more says something positive about the quality of most people who contribute. either way though, the site works much better when everyone gets involved and throws in their two cents.

as long as those people know a little about what they’re talking about and can write reasonably well.

by cap'n hack on Jul 9, 2008 12:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

I would be in favor of a slightly stricter filtration process on the fanposts….seems like we get repeat posts and really pointless stuff a little too frequently. I’m not a big censorship guy and I think for the most part just about everyone should be able to post, but its tough when obviously not very many people actually put much thought or research into their fanpost. Its not usually too bad except on days like today or around the draft, so maybe I should just stop whining.

by sam23 on Jul 9, 2008 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

filtration

that seems to be the general point of the recommended posts and it seems to work well. those posts stay up for a while and the rest get pushed out quickly (at least during high activity times like this). not to mention the fact that they get loads more comments and discussion going.

by cap'n hack on Jul 9, 2008 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and we need the rec posts

with how dead the front page is, a day like today not one thing could have been put up quickly for people to discuss in?

by The Golden One on Jul 9, 2008 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+100000

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Blog-a-Bull guy is like the SB Nation Basketball head guy

I could care less about his writing, I am interested in trading for his logo. That thing brings me endless joy. Sooooooo bad it’s great! Maybe we can send Kosta and and a few of our shittier fan-posters for the logo.

Storage is for business, or for family.

by bloodsweatndonuts on Jul 9, 2008 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Meh.

It doesn’t hold a candle to the webpin you designed for OptionZero. I want that plastered on my tombstone.

Sign ^^^^ !!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 9, 2008 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right

The negativity you’re talking about caused me to completely stop coming to this site for the last quarter of the season because I just couldn’t take it anymore. The draft renewed my itch to talk GSW 24/7 though :)

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

My doctor said the negativity had a hand in my high blood pressure so I had stay away for a while…

Of course, all that salty filipino food I was eating back then didn’t help things either.

"I am the CHOSEN ONE"

by Tim&ChrisBurger on Jul 9, 2008 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"let's make the playoffs or let's barely missit ?"

yeah this signing makes us better, but how much better is what is in question. i am sure the offseason isn’t done yet, but i don’t see us improving our team that much to make a run for the championship in this western conference. in fact i see it hindering our chances because of the size of maggete’s contract. i always thought patience is a virtue and thats what ainge and the celts did. that’s what kupchak did to get gasol. i was hoping we would do the same. oh well…..go dubs anyways!

by nuttinbutnet on Jul 8, 2008 10:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We dont have that choice though

since we have Ellis and Bieds that need resigned. Once those moves are made it ties us up for awhile. So this was really our only choice.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand ur point now.

i love this sight for its knowledge! reading this shiet and understanding it makes me look like a complete genius amongst my friends and family.

as mentioned the offseason isn’t over so hopefully we can trade TMNT for somebody and pick up another body with the 9 million.

i still think we shoud go after javaris or livingston also. monta just seems to flourish more off the ball where he isn’t the main focus.

by nuttinbutnet on Jul 8, 2008 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea I see TMNT being moved

Dont know if they will get anything really out of it. But from the way its sounds he is so un-happy, If they cant find a good deal, they will prob look for another expiring contract around is worth.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pree's article

Makes a good point where Monta can play point. But it will be an unconventional point gaurd. Without as much as other teams doing. When they get stuck in half court sets then go to Jax.
Don;t have to go by the book, if you have something else that will work for your team.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maggette will do well on this team, but I agree with most of you: it was a bit much. Maggette opted out of a $7mill paycheck to go into FA knowing that there were only 2 teams that could offer him more than the MLE, which were Philly and Memphis. It seems to me that he was looking more for a big total contract as opposed to a bump in annual salary. Otherwise, why opt out of a $7 mill deal to take a $5.8 mill deal? If the other potential suitors were offering $5.8, the W’s offering $8.6 seems to be $1.5 mill too much. Too bad the W’s had all this cap space in a weak FA year.

by barrance on Jul 8, 2008 10:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He prob figured at that point

The Clips suck and are going no where, this was before baron came there. So most likely he was thinking the MLE is not that much different than my current deal. I will opt and take the MLE for one year with a true contender, then go for the payday next year. But the dominoes fell in to place and he ended up getting his pay day this year.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The MLE offers would come from legit immediate contenders. We paid to lure him away from a more immediate shot at a ring. Another possibility of course was to renegotiate with the Clips, since with Brand gone, they didn’t need to release his Bird rights to get Baron. It’s probably a bit much for Maggette, but he’s actually been a rather productive player for a while. Not spectacular, but he rebounds well, scores with pretty good efficiency because he draws fouls. He’s not known as a committed defender (he’ll fit right in!) but he’s been among his team’s plus/minus leaders for the last three seasons. That spans a playoff team, a near miss, and an ‘out of it’ season, so it’s hard to write it off as a product of environment. He appears to be a real contributor.

There’s something to the notion that getting talent is more important that filling positions. The positions of need weren’t really available on the market. This opens up moves. Harrington’s the logical move. Jax may see his name come up, having a year removed from incidence and coming off big scoring numbers. I’ve no qualms with Harrington leaving. I’ve got real mixed feelings about Jax. I fear that his presence may really mean as much as it seemed it did, but I also fear that minus Baron he’ll no longer keep it together and implode.

by jae on Jul 8, 2008 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea he could have renogiated with the clips.

But he wasnt really happy there at all recently. Without Brand there. He probably figured no money was worth going back to that disaster he was finally getting out of.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Golden One...

makes a very good point. Our chance to spend all this cap space really ends as soon as we re-sign Monta because his cap hold is so much less than his expected salary. With that considered and the fact that we still have room to sign another FA and trade Al for depth I’m starting to feel a little better about this.

I’m kinda disappointed we whiffed on Brand. I would have understood more if he stayed in LA but the fact that he went to Philly for (presumably) less than we were offering hurts a little bit.

I can’t wait to see what other moves we have in store. I’d still like to get Childress as an eventual replacement for Jack and I would mind picking up Arroyo to add some depth at Point. I also agree that we should take a shot a Livingston and see if he can resurrect his career next to Monta.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 10:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Main thing that sucks about Brand is

that it was out of our hands. He went to the east because it’s so much easier to win there. If we were in the east and offered him the same deal, I have no doubt he would have signed with us.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

your right. I totally get it, but it is still hard to swallow as a fan who would have loved to watch a 20-10 guy on the Warriors.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep until the Sixers

stepped up there offer by getting Minnesota to take on contracts. I would say it was prob 50/50 Clips or Dubs. But in the end Brand gets to go where he really wants to. Just thank the Minnesota front office for the second year in a row.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Childress seems unlikley now

the new kid is presumably the replacement for JAX I would think

We defiantly need to pick up a pass first point guard for the bench and insurance

by SFzig on Jul 8, 2008 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

childress

I really thought there was a good chance he’d make his way back to the bay this offseason, but I guess thats extremely unlikely now.

by sam23 on Jul 8, 2008 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really doubt that the Warriors were ever even remotely interested in Childress

Nellie really believes in spacing the floor on offense and he wants to have as many 3-point shooters on the floor as possible. Childress can’t even hit the mid-ranger (I know his 3-point percentage actually isn’t that bad but those are all wide open 3’s, just look at his 3PA/G. Childress regularly passes up wide open shots and is only comfortable around the rim on offense).

This probably also explains why the Warriors only had lukewarm interest in Josh Smith.

fwiw I enjoy watching both players and I loved watching the Hawks last year (especially J-Smoove!) They just don’t fit into our system.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maggette and Turiaf

arent exactly long range snipers

by sam23 on Jul 9, 2008 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

re

Maggette’s okay from beyond the arc just based off of last year’s stats. I actually have no idea about his mid-range, never really watched him that much cuz Clippers had a boring team.

I know Turiaf can hit the mid-ranger. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s part of why the Warriors targeted him.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you folks know...

If Baron’s deal with the Clippers is still verbal just as Maggette’s?

What if tomorrow Baron and Corey sign with the Dubs at the same time. that be a trip.

[ passes the Mic to a random GSoMer ]

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Jul 8, 2008 10:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Baron would have to come back for considerably less money if Maggs gets his deal. To have cap room, the Warriors have to renounce Baron (or have him sign elsewhere). That pulls Bird rights and means he’d have to settle for $9mil. If he’d do that, I bet management would deal with the crispy charred remains of a bridge just fine.

by jae on Jul 8, 2008 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think Baron knows this may be his only shot at

this long of a deal. He played through pain this year hoping to get paid. Now that he has, he can take his money and not worry about having to play through the pain that much again.

He would have been more inclined to try playing more in pain if Brand was there. Now that he is not, he will sit alot. This really has turned really bad for the Clips all in one night.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clippers

still have some decent talent around Baron with Mobley, Gordon, Kaman and Thornton. They now have a good chunk of cap space too, and I expect theyll push hard for J-Smoove. If they cant land him they seem like a strong possibility to pursue Zach Randolph if D’Antoni cant fit him into his system. If they really want to add another forward I’d certainly consider some sort of Al for Mobley deal giving us a bigger guard with some PG experience, though I doubt theyd have much interest in Al with Tim Thomas already on the roster.

by sam23 on Jul 8, 2008 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doubt right now, the two teams would deal with each other.

Think there not really happy with each other.
I still think J. Smith will just have whatever offer matched by ATL.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Baron burned all bridges

with the front office, by repeately telling them he wasnt going to opt out and then blind siding them at the last sec.

He will just take is big contract, be happy with the money. the most likely be “hurt” alot the next 5 years in L.A.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 10:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Another opion to get a PG

A possible trade would be to send Harrington to Memphis for Warrick, Crittenton and Milicic. This could help us with a versitle SF in Warrick coming off the bench, Crittenton to play sparingly throughout the season and gain NBA experience and lastly, Milicic to back up Beans and give us a different look at Center. The best thing about this trade is that it does not eat at our exsiting salary cap and if the trade is a complete failure you technically only rented these players for one year except Milicic which has a 2 yr contract.

This still gives us the cap space to persue other FA and/or gives us flexibility later in the year to pull off other trades.

What do you all think?

by KillaCrossOver on Jul 8, 2008 11:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

great dream scenerio for me..

but I think the trade heavily favors the Dubz and Memphis would suffer another robbery.

by mont8ellis on Jul 8, 2008 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is Chris Wallace

Though we’d probably have to throw in a pick. Maybe lotto protected for next year, then top 5 protected the following year or something.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 9, 2008 7:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maggette = bigger Richardson

worse shooter. that’s it.

wtf is this man. does the front office really think we can make a playoff run with what is in essence a maggette for davis trade? if not, then why not save the money, let the young guns develop and make a serious run for the crazy FA’s next season?

fuck man. wtf is this middle of the road bullshit. like i said before in a fanpost, i don’t care what the strategy as long as you stick to it… but this is fan appeasement/play-the-safe-card to the fullest.

grow some balls.

by dso on Jul 8, 2008 11:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Read the other posts

Next FA is not an option. After we resign Ellis and Beids, we will be filled up this year and next.
Our only option was to sign Maggette now or get nothing this year and next year.
With the situation were in, this really was the best possible deal out there.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually a better shooter than J-Rich, and about the same size too

Check Maggette’s stats in within the past three seasons, then compare with Richardson’s past three seasons. Maggette has a higher field goal percentage with less attempts, and is way better at the free throw line. By replacing J-Rich with Corey, we take a marginal hit when it comes to points per game and turnovers while getting more consistent shooting and slightly more experience, with other areas being about the same.

Of course, heart and other intangibles are another matter.

by J-Triumf on Jul 9, 2008 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Better shooter?

I guess it depends on how you define shooter. I think using the most common definition, J Rich is a much better shooter. When someone uses the term “shooter,” I usually think of outside shooting, and J Rich is clearly better at outside shooting, including both mid-range and 3-point attempts. One of the biggest weaknesses in J Rich’s game is his lack of frequency in driving to the hole – which happens to be Maggette’s biggest strength. Obviously almost any time player A drives more than player B, player A will have a higher FG%.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True Shooting Percentage

Is a good way to define “shooting ability,” since it factors in three-point shooting and free throws attempted (while ignoring free throw percentage). The Basketball Reference formula is: PTS / (2 * (FGA + 0.44 * FTA)).

By that measure, Maggette is a significantly better shooter than JRich: Career 57.6% / 51.9%

Effective FG Percentage measures only shooting and 3 pt shooting, ignoring the ability to draw fouls (which I think is a little silly). The BR formula for this is: (FG + 0.5 * 3P) / FGA.

By that measure, JRich, a better 3-pt shooter than Mags, has a very slight edge: Career 48.9% / 47.8%.

And of course there’s the tried and true Free Throw Percentage, which may the purest measure of all of the quality of a shooter’s stroke. The people we regard as the purest shooters ever — Ray Ray, Reggie Miller, Bird, Mullin et al. — all tend to have ridiculously good FT percentages. In that respect, it’s Mags hands down: Career 81.9% / 70.2%.

Overall, I think it’s totally reasonable to say “Maggette is a better shooter than JRich.”

Sign ^^^^ !!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 9, 2008 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

re

Okay I guess when I think of the term “shooter” I just think of outside shooting ability. I thought that would be normal but I guess not. I don’t think there’s any question that J Rich is a superior outside shooter to Maggette. Last year he attempted 7.3 3-pointers per game and knocked down 40% of them. He set an NBA record for 3-pointers made in a season.

Also, J Rich’s ability now is a lot different from what his career stats show since he works so hard to improve his game every year. Last season he had a true shooting percentage of 58%. (of course, Maggete has to go crazy and post a 67% tsp, preventing me from arguing more. Bastard)

Even effective FG percentage doesn’t really get at what I’m trying to say because it still rewards Maggette for shooting more lay-ups. All I was basically saying is that I would take J Rich in a 3-point contest. I thought that’s what most people thought of when they think of who a better “shooter” is.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're probably right

But in that case the whole concept of someone being a “better shooter” than someone else is pretty trivial. If Mags gets more points in fewer shots than JRich, he’s more efficient at shooting. Nobody’s forcing JRich to shoot from deep. I believe resident stats guru JAE broke it down thusly: “a point is a point.”

Sign ^^^^ !!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 9, 2008 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you respect the shooter more than the driver because...

I don’t get it. Maggs scores far more efficiently, gets to the line racking up fouls for the other team and getting us to the bonus, doesn’t jack up shots when we’re in a shooting slump… What about being a better “jump shooter” or “3pt shooter” is better than that?

Points are points are points. I don’t care if Beans develops some weird behind the back shot from half court. If it goes in consistently, I’m happy.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 9, 2008 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s real common for people to fall into the trap that burying the long range shot is somehow a more valuable skill. The notion that shots inside are “easier” (e.g. “just dunks and layups”) somehow goes wild in the mind to the point that one forgets that a point is a point. I’ve said it before: if converting inside shots was so easy, why don’t more people do it well?

The tendency for the guy taking the inside shot to be in position to rebound seems to be ignored as well. Getting to the line is oft ignored despite the fact that the skill is one of the few aspects of offense that accomplishes a defensive goal as well. Drawing the foul usually results in more points than a FG attempt, even for guys who aren’t particularly stellar FT shooters, but it also can put an opponent in foul trouble, changing the way the defense has to play.

I think that there’s the notion that on his own, the driver or interior scorer will be shut down. Perhaps, to a degree, but it rarely plays out that way in the real world. Guys who score efficiently seem to find a way to do it and do it consistently.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said anything about respect

Somebody said that Maggette is a better shooter than J Rich, and when I think of the phrase “a better shooter,” I think of outside shooting ability. I thought that would be the norm but apparently not.

It’s just like if I’m talking with my friends, I would say that J Rich is a better shooter than Shaq, even though I know that Shaq has a higher FG%. I thought that’s just the way most people talk.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will not weigh in on Maggette being a better shooter than Richardson. He is, however, a more efficient scorer. That is almost always more important to team success than being a better shooter. Maggette has enough of a track record to suggest that this is something we can continue to expect. He has enough of a track record to suggest that shutting down his offense because so many of his shots are layups isn’t easy to do, that he has an ability that defenses don’t really have an ability to contest, and that these shots come in high enough volume that it’s not just garbage points that someone else would have just as easily taken. It suggest that it’s easier to limit Richardson’s offense by letting him miss the long range shots that, despite his ability, he still misses 60% of the time.

And that’s not a knock on Richardson.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Billups for Harrington?

What in the world is up with this rumor? Dumars trades his Finals MVP for a guy who doesn’t show up for the playoffs?

"We're Menudo," -BB

by eshock on Jul 8, 2008 11:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

hehe i saw that

Guess thats why you call it a rumor, could never see that happening. Though I won’t mind it. Just wont happen though.

by The Golden One on Jul 8, 2008 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

The “rumor” I read (Hoopsworld) did at least say that it would take a lot more (prospects/picks) to get him.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf Signs offer sheet

http://www.pe.com/sports/basketball/lakers/stories/PE_Sports_Local_S_turiaf_09.47b3657.html

Looks like we may snag him at 4yr $17mil. Not bad if it’s true.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 8, 2008 11:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

wasn't he

already headed there, regardless of front office activity?

by cap'n hack on Jul 9, 2008 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It has been rumored

But nothing for certain. Wondering if this means the Warriors know his true intentions.

by The Golden One on Jul 9, 2008 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice

And we’ll still have maybe 6 mil left too.

by joestar on Jul 9, 2008 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf

That looks like a pretty reasonable deal for a backup big guy. He had a PER of 15.05 last season, basically right at what is defined as average. The intangibles he brings in energy and emotion make him an ideal guy to have coming off of the bench.

It seems pretty unlikely that the Lakers will match this offer consider that they’re already into the luxury tax, so matching would cost them $34 million.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If that offer holds up, I’m all for it. The Lakers are in tax territory, else it’s a no brainer to match.

That sort of move makes it seem more likely that Harrington is on the block. Turiaf would back up at center and split time at PF with Wright, I’d suspect. He’s probably not an above average player at this point, but could improve, isn’t terrible, and that’s not an above average salary.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maggette for Chauncey ?

If we got Corey to package to Detroit with Harrington, then I like the move. Otherwise, losing Baron for Corey and an additional 15 million over the next five years is terrible. I think Nellie does not like Baron. I can’t wait Nellie to leave GSW.

by There in '75 on Jul 9, 2008 12:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Baron chose to opt out

after telling the warriors he wouldnt. Do not think of it as a straight up swap. Think of it has the warriors trying to make the best out of a bad situation after they got blind sided.

by The Golden One on Jul 9, 2008 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You should look at it like Baron for Maggette and cap room. If what olympicmike posted is true than we would also have gotten Turiaf who fills our need for size and inside player.

by joestar on Jul 9, 2008 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

stop acting so cheap

I rather keep Maggette. if a dood make 10 millions a yr and puts up 22, 6, 4? well he made his money worth. Hell, that kinda cure the pain of losing J-rich. Hopefully AR get good and be our all star point forward that could also plays both forward spot. Than it all good than.

by warriorfan4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

x2

HORRIBLE idea—sorry to say. we are much better off going with a younger guy to backup monta, especially since it looks like with the maggette signing he’s going to be moved to the point

by gogoldenbears on Jul 9, 2008 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

me too

i love watching a team implode on itself. particularly my favorite team.

by cap'n hack on Jul 9, 2008 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who was blindsided?

I heard the Warriors offered Baron a two year deal. That is like telling him to leave. Sound like the same old Warriors with Nellie to me.

by There in '75 on Jul 9, 2008 12:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Giving Baron more than two years

Is like trading for Rich Harden and hoping he won’t hit the DL twice by the end of August.

by joestar on Jul 9, 2008 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and after Harden is coming off two games where he quite isnt right.

‘75 Warriors were blindsided because Baron told his teammates and coaches leading up to the final day he would not opt out. If they knew this was going to happen they could have drafted differently or used there trade exception.

You cant blame the warriors for not wanting to go long term with a 5 year deal to Baron.

Baron has only been fine one season, even the season before when he first lost weight he sat out games. He only played all 82 games this year because he was looking for a pay day.
I’ll put money on it it he never plays all 82 again.

by The Golden One on Jul 9, 2008 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fyp

You thank God for the Warriors not wanting to go long term with a 5 year deal to Baron

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check your numbers

Don’t make assumptions before you look at his stats. I guess he scored 22ppg last season, because he couldn’t shoot huh.

by joestar on Jul 9, 2008 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really stat man?

Because he put up a ton of shots. Career 45% shooter and he drives most of the time.

by There in '75 on Jul 9, 2008 12:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You do realize you can just reply directly to my comment with just one post instead of spamming the boards, right?

by J-Triumf on Jul 9, 2008 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

reply directly to my comment with just one post

Someone summarize it for me ? Boom misses more games than Maggette? Boom plays worse defense? Boom is way older ? Boom is point guard ,Magette is 2/3 ? Boom a gamble for 5 years but Magette sure thing? Is the better field goal percentage worth the swap? Especially if it means Montay plays out of position at point?

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

got it

you’re not a maggette fan

by cap'n hack on Jul 9, 2008 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've got an Idea!

How about you wait three seconds before hitting the post button and finish your thought in one post instead of five. Please stop spamming the threads.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Jul 9, 2008 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know who else has a knack for being trigger happy? :P

Sorry, couldn’t help it. I figured I linked to Richardson’s stats here twice already that a third time just made sense.

by J-Triumf on Jul 9, 2008 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmm

I don’t totally hate either of these signings. Both of these guys certainly have their uses, and while we’re overpaying a bit for both, neither contract is ridiculous.

But I’m hoping we already have a pretty good idea of where we’re sending Al. Because this roster is pretty imbalanced, and that’ll be immediately apparent to other teams… Al’s clearly pretty worthless to us at this point. That makes it hard to get value for the guy.

If we can move Al for something useful, whether it be PG depth, a pick or a touch of cap space, then this’ll all add up just fine. But if we just grabbed these guys without any forethought, this could get a little ugly.

by onlxn on Jul 9, 2008 1:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank you gsomers

I feel a lot better about this signing now that I realize that we wouldn’t be able to sign a free agent next year after resigning Monta and AB this year. Maggette was the best UFA available and it was absolutely the right move to sign him while we still had money to sign free agents. We obviously had to overpay a little or else why would he come to Oakland but it wasn’t outrageous and he’s a lot better than getting nothing.

It's almost like the Warriors have 6 guys out there... they always have a guy open! - Jon Barry commentating game 3 last year

by gsw4life on Jul 9, 2008 5:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Were looking a lil better...

PG: Monta/ Watson
SG: Jack/ Marco/ Bukie
SF: Maggette/ Randolph
PF: Al/ Wright/ Hendrix
C: Andris/ Turiaf

I hope we trade Al for Hinrich or a player of that caliber.

by Spee-D on Jul 9, 2008 8:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

BWright's the key, I think

If he takes a huge step towards Bosh-ville — say puts up 14/9, with active D — I could easily see that team winning 45-50 games.

If he still looks a bit skinny and green, I think we’re looking at more like 37-45.

Sign ^^^^ !!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 9, 2008 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

45-50 games

lol…rose colored glasses much? This team now needs a new identity. Lots of questions. Who’s getting the ball in crunchtime? Ellis or Mags? Or Sjax? How will Sjax handle being baron-less? Will these guys get along? Can Ellis develop into a PG?

Last year, it was easy to predict a 45-50 win team because it was essentially the same nucleus from The Run minus J-Rich. Any team without Murphy/Dunleavy will be a better team than with them. You’re going out on quite a limb predicting that crazy win total. I think 37-40 is a realistic goal for a mediocre team that has no super star.

I’d say Ellis’ development into a leader is much more the key to this team than Bwright. A leader in a sense of being able to will the team thru shooting slumps, sealing games in the 4th qtr (an sjax/bdiddy affair last year), and becoming a more efficient distributor. It can definitely happen…but it’ll happen over the course of a season. I don’t believe this team can win 45 games, as currently constructed.

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 9, 2008 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only way to find an identity is to play the game

Also, see what the match up is. If we’re playing SAS and Bowen is guarding Monta, Udoka is guarding Maggs, and we can get Duncan on Jax on a switch, well… it’s an obvious choice. I don’t buy into the “Give it to the Alpha Dog in crunch time” theory. To use the Lakers/Celtics as an example, giving it to Kobe for the last shot is all well and good until you’ve got Kobe being guarded by Posey with Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce keeping tabs on him. What you really need is Kobe to drive, draw the defense, then pass it to somebody else before the defense gets the chance to reset. You don’t need Kobe to be the “Alpha Dog”, you need to have the ball in the hands of players who are able to recognize what action leads to the team’s best chance of winning a game.

That’s not to say you can have players who are deferring to each other, you need players who want the ball, and want to win, and trust their teammates to make smart decisions.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 9, 2008 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

alpha dog

Sorry dude. The NBA is an alpha dog league.

“You don’t need Kobe to be the ‘Alpha Dog’,”.............What you really need is Kobe to drive, draw the defense…

So, you don’t need an alpha dog…but you need him to create the winning shot for his teammate? That means you need the AD surrounded w/decent players. Obviously we’d agree that its best to field the strongest team at every position, but you gotta have that top dawg to put you over the top.

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 9, 2008 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That means you need the AD surrounded w/decent players

Or a real point guard to successfully pass it to the alpha dawg?

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

define real point guard

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 10, 2008 6:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

define real point guard

A facilitator, Someone who can dribble extremely well, pass crisply, knows the game inside and out,knows the opposition, Excellent vision, high intelligence, Makes their teammates better than they would be without him, JRich heart, BoomDizzle cool. Jason Williams creativity

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 10, 2008 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you just defined

alpha dog!

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 10, 2008 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You misunderstand the meaning of "Alpha Dog"

An alpha dog is the biggest baddest dog who does whatever he wants. It’s the guy who goes to the bar and has to drink more than everybody else. It’s the guy who sees other guys hitting on girls and tries to steal the girl. It’s the guy who insists that he’s the best basketball player on the floor and tries to prove it by driving right through the teeth of the defense.

Alpha Dog is an attitude. Of course you need good players on your basketball team, duh. If you have a great player, you can use that to your advantage by letting the defense key on him and moving the ball to an advantageous spot before the defense reacts (like MJ throwing it to Steve Kerr for the game winner, etc.). You don’t want to decide a priori who gets the last shot because he’s your best player.

What we don’t need is to say “Ok, 7 seconds left, give the ball to Monta”. We need “Ok, 7 seconds left, if Bowen’s on Monta, run it through Maggs, if they double you, pass out of it… quick decisions”.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 10, 2008 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, pretty rosy

You’ll note though that the 45-50 I pulled OOMA is contingent on BWright becoming Bosh, which is pretty big IF. I consider Wright the key because he’s the biggest question mark, with the biggest range between his upside and downside. We basically know what we’re going to get out of Monta. If he puts up #s similar to the second half of last season — when most nights he was a better player than BD — we’ll be fine. His leadership skills will be a gradual, natural outgrowth of his on-court performance. Emotionally, I’m sure everyone knows and is cool with the fact that right now Jackson is the de facto team leader.

Sign ^^^^ !!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 9, 2008 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're talking

about that freak February…when he was better than anyone on the planet. That was Barry Bondsian in how dominant he was from all over the court. Never seen a shooting stretch like that from a player, ever. I’d be curious to see how his play affected our W/L. My guess is that we were still doing the win win lose thing we did seemingly all season. It’ll be an interesting season at least.

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 9, 2008 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually 9 guards have done that

And his march and April weren’t shabby either: 22.5/6.5/4.5 average. Yeah, that’s a whole 35 games where he averaged 24/6/4.5.

And Win-Win-Lose gets you to 0.667, or 54 wins… I’ll take that.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 10, 2008 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Any team without Murphy/Dunleavy will be a better team than with them.

Are you sure? When Boom came we had a starting line up of Boom,JRich, Dunleavey, Murph, and Foyle. Now it’s Montay,Magette,Jax,Al, and Dris. I think I could win more games with the first line up?

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously...

Second lineup.

Maggs gets to the line 10 times a game, thus getting Monta/Jax/Al/Dris to the line more in the bonus. Dunleavy was not what he is today. He wasn’t. And he wasn’t assured to become what he is today.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 9, 2008 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i like you

but you’re crazy. second lineup all day every day.

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 9, 2008 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you’re crazy. second lineup all day every day

Are you sure? Think about it. Boom and Jason smiling and hooking up for alley-oops, Foyle blocking shots and posting up for a sweet hook shot, Murph shooting threes and rebounding! Slap Dunleavey around a bit and tell him to get out there and bring home the money and my team would be dope.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

assuming you're joking, but...

I mean… we had that team. There’s no guesswork as to what that lineup would be capable of. It was a 34-48 team.

We went 48-34 this year, so we were fourteen games ahead of that Dunmurphian pace. In terms of the starting fives you’ve listed, we’ve replaced Baron with Maggette, and that’s a downgrade, I think everyone would agree. It’s not a fourteen-game downgrade, especially when you factor in that Monta and Biedrins are likely to get better this season, and the other three aren’t at all likely to get worse.

None of us are ecstatic about how this offseason’s going, but let’s not go overboard. This is still a vastly better roster than any we had from ‘95-’06.

by onlxn on Jul 9, 2008 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There’s no guesswork as to what that lineup would be capable of

Yep, It was 18-9 after Boom came in 05. If next seasons team is 18-9 after the first 25 games then it will be better.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm...

So, you get to pick a 27 game stretch where “Team 1” was 18-9, but no mention of the following 82 games when they went 34-48?

Does that mean “Team 2” get’s to pick it’s own 27 game sample from the upcoming 109 games?

How about you combine both years for an overall record of 52-59? Would Team 2 be better than that? Hard to say, it’d be close.

You may run like Hayes. but you hit like sh**!

by Orbit1099 on Jul 9, 2008 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I loved that run too

But which is more indicative of that team’s true level of ability: a 27-game stretch in which the new-look squad took people by surprise, or the solidly bad 82-game stretch the following season? Or the fact that that team, even WITH the developing Monta and Beans and the out-of-nowhere Barnes, had a losing record the day the Dunleavy trade was made?

Look, Baron at his best is AMAZING. Nobody on the current team, Monta included, is capable of taking a game over, in any facet, the way Baron is. But Baron’s merely good a lot, Baron’s outright bad sometimes, and most importantly, Baron’s hurt a lot. It’s not about cherrypicking the best month some roster had… it’s about being realistic about talent levels. That was a shitty supporting cast, one that Baron was generally unable to overcome. Even in its incomplete form, this is a deeper, better-designed, and flat-out better roster than that one.

by onlxn on Jul 9, 2008 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

which is more indicative of that team’s true level of ability: a 27-game stretch in which the new-look squad took people by surprise, or the solidly bad 82-game stretch the following season?

Actually the first 27 games are the true indicator of that talent. The next year Montgomery pushed Booms buttons the wrong way and things went downhill from there. Sometimes it’s better to just go out and play loose like Boom and Jason did for those 27 games. Nelson came in too stuck on smallball to give that crew a further chance to flourish. Then the trade made it a non issue and also made us for one half year a very effective team. Too bad it dint last? Haha, and notice my original comment said “I could win more games with team one” not Nelson could win more with team one.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 9, 2008 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

dude

the more you pimp the first lineup…the crazier you sound. stop or my mom will shoot

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 10, 2008 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

stop or my mom will shoot

We got shooters, Can she play point?

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 10, 2008 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A classic reference...

I wonder what Belinelli’s mom looks like

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 10, 2008 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Easy to predict 45-50 wins last year? Only with rose-colored glasses.

Vegas put the opening over under at 42 a year ago. They set this figuring half the money will go to over, half will go under. If it was easy to predict it being that high, the line would have been higher.

Last year we needed Baron to be health to win. That was far from a given. We needed Jax to keep it together, to not implode post suspension. That was far from a given. We had a relatively healthy year (Biedrins appendix being the only substantial time loss among a contributor), got above what people hoped for in Monta and we won 48 games. It came together and we won 48. I don’t see how predicting 45-50 was easy, unless you assume everything comes together.

by jae on Jul 9, 2008 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what i meant

was that it was far easier to get away with “45 wins 07-08” then trying to predict the same this year. Like sleepy said, he’s tieing his wagon to a “bosh = bwright” transformation…so yeah, that’s a little less likely than baron playing healthy in a contract year and sjax maintaining his cool (something he did, for the most part, during The Run).

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Jul 10, 2008 6:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're taking sleepy's hopes a little too literally

He’s “hoping” that Wright turns into Bosh. He’s not expecting it… just hoping.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Jul 10, 2008 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think if he’s signed that Buike would be higher on the depth chart as a backup to the SF than Randolph.

From what I’ve heard, Randolph is a year or two away.

by belilaugh on Jul 9, 2008 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's not

that bad getting CM, rather have gotten iggy instead but this is not a bad pick up, even if we over paid. we get bigger (CM for BD ), more athletic, better FT %. I know everyone is concerned about a pg, but i believe the way we play ME would do just fine, when we’re playing good we’re not running too many half-court sets and even then, who was the team’s best isolation player the 2nd half of the season? what we really need is our 1st rounders to contribute, that’s why i’m really interested in summer league.

by KeepdaCore on Jul 9, 2008 9:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...

What I like about the roster is there is room for growth. Monta and AB are still developing…Wright,Randolph and Belinelli are relatively unknown…There’s room for improvement, lots of it.

You may run like Hayes. but you hit like sh**!

by Orbit1099 on Jul 9, 2008 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see things a little differently

OK, let’s put the Dubs at $9m under the cap- seems fair.

That would mean around $49.5m (I’m giving a little more space).

From there, let’s say that the absolute max management would be willing to pay is $70m, which is just under the luxury tax. I’d argue that it’s less than that, but I’m giving a best case scenario.

As such, the Warriors would have $20.5m in reasonable space. Whether you think Monta and Beans combine to make $18m (like you do) or $20.5m (like I do), there isn’t much space to work with there, and there can’t be any argument that ME, AB, and Turiaf would fill this gap. Even with potential trades of Harrington and Steven Jackson, the 125% rule will be in effect, so the max the Warriors could shed in those deals would be $3-4m, and that’s a best-case scenario (to be technical, $4.09m of savings is the absolute max if there were theoretically players making exactly 75% of those two and were available). As such, the Warriors would then have room to sign Turiaf and some $2m guy without going over the tax.

by dprodigy19 on Jul 9, 2008 11:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Keyon Dooling and Janeero Pargo are looking pretty good…

by monta101 on Jul 9, 2008 8:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I like Pargo waayyyy better than Dooling. Pargo is more versatile…..... Either way both would have trouble with all the big PGs…...

by m49 on Jul 9, 2008 9:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Help Fire Don Nelson By Signing Petition
We_re_back__small
Terms of Service and Moderation on GSoM...
Small
Five Good Things So Far
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
The Warriors as Simpsons

Recent FanPosts

Lakers_small
Stephen Jackson - Trade Partner/Asset Analysis & Weighted Ranking
Britwarriorgswavatar_small
GSW Coaching - Who is the Boss?
Small
Don't trade Stephen Jackson
Pitofdespairguy_small
Warriors Chemistry and Leadership
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Jonny Flynn, Wayne Ellington, Corey Brewer: Summer Glimpse to Fall For-Real
Sp_baron_edited_small
Could the Warriors run the triangle offense?
Small
Would you be opposed to trading Ellis?
Australian_flag_reduced_small
Miami Interested in Stephen Jackson Trade
Small
Who is your starting 5 if you ran the team?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GSoM Motto

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae