Jersey's response to Williams trade
Williams: “I Never Got the Opportunity to Play in New Jersey”
August 3, 2008, 12:12 am
Following up on his earlier comment that he was ”playing not to make mistakes, trying to stay on the court…” while with the Nets, Marcus Williams tells a Connecticut reporter, “It seems like I never got the opportunity to play in New Jersey, so to have a new start to show what I can do, it’s exciting.” Williams, along with Josh Boone, will play in UConn’s annual charity game next weekend.
.....Interested in finding out what the fans over in sunny New Jersey had to say about the Williams trade, I spent some time looking through their forums.
Here's what they had to say about Marcus Williams, and the trade itself...
KiddLovesNets says:
"This deal is quite similar with that Camby trade, pathetic. Oddly enough, I'm actually pretty calm this time. Maybe it's time for we Nets fans to regard this team as the next Grizzlies. After all, I don't see any Grizzlies fans complaining their team's dumb trades since they've already become desperate..."
IlliniFan says:
"You're a moron. This is a very good trade for the Nets."
gigantes says:
"the point was not his PT or his averages, the point was his potential. and it wasn't potential in the typical sense of "we've been hanging on to this guy for years because his potential is still so high". the fact is that marcus williams never even had a second training camp.
and don't forget that harris has four years in the NBA, two of them as a starter. meanwhile, marcus only had a single training camp in the NBA and only got to start a few games.
also, we like harris and of course we hope that he will be a superior PG in the NBA but it's not a guarantee of anything. saying that marcus didn't improve from his rookie year is the kind of observation that someone millions of miles away from the situation would say. the reality is, there were mitigating circumstances to consider."
VCDrivesaPorcheToWork says:
"this was also done for the sake of MW.
he was a star at UConn, blessed with amazing court vision and averaging about 8-9 APG.
but comon now, we all know he is not a lights out shooter so by that alone, he cannot be brought off the bench and be expected to do anything good with the ball
he is a talent for sure, but he needs to be a starter in order to flourish.
look for him to do great things in GS."
Elone says:
"Great job Frank. Once again you provided your young players with the confidence they needed to succeed.
This coach might be the absolute worst in the league."
Jabbez says:
"Marcus had better players in front of him while on the Nets. That won’t be the case in GS, and we’ll all be watching to see if he can be the player he thinks he is. He’ll probably have some nice offensive stats, and the Warriors will be bounced in the first playoff round if they make it at all. Perhaps his early season injury contributed, but he definitely regressed last year as a playmaker.
I’m happy for him and wish him the best, but statements like this support the deal. He was going to get increasingly frustrated on the bench and his value would only have declined, so a first round pick for him works for both sides."
Geo says:
"Marcus, you had many opportunities and you did not cash in on them: you were out of shape and did not have a good attitude and never worked on your defense. What do you expect? Rondo was considered less talented than you and many predicted you would have a better career (Okay, it’s early) but Rondo got it and worked on it and showed he could play both ends of the court effectively. Now, you did not show a pulse on the d (Famous quote: MWilliams could not guard a bank with a gun, or something like that)and you never fully showed you could run an offense. Yes, you had flashes, but you remind me of someone who thinks you deserve it or are entitled to it and don’t have to work at it. Rondo worked, as did your other peers like Farmar etc. You have yet to work. Maybe the trade will shake you up, but judging from your demeanor, I doubt it. Yeah, it’s hard to play behind Kidd, but when you were behind Harris, you showed just as little. Don’t blame the coach, folks, not even Mwilliams would do that. Blame the man himself: stand up for once MWilliams."
Mr. DollarBill says:
"Marcus didn’t attempt to play any defense, he overdribbled way too much, and clearly, was only concerned about his own shot and not creating anyone else’s. With that said, i do believe he was playing not to make mistakes. Antione Wright and most of the younger guys were playing the same way if you ask me…Frank is a garbage coach that cannot instill any confidence in his players or teach them effectively, you don’t coach rookies thru fear. Frank would let the veterans blow defensive assignment after defensive assignment and he’d stick with them, but let the kids screw up, they’d get yanked right out of the game, and i found that to be counter productive. You don’t sit there and let Malik Allen allow the defense to score several times and not blink an eye, then turn around and bench Sean for not being where he’s supposed to be on defense. I’m sure i’m not the only who noticed that kind of crap taking place last year.
Still, Marcus was not in the best of shape, he rarely played like he wanted to succeed, and he didn’t play the PG position to the best of his abilities. Good luck to him in GS, because if he does his thing out there, that will make Lawrence Frank look horrible."
Spartan says:
"Marcus was a star in college, but he simply has not yet shown that he has NBA level talent. Obviously there are a numbers of fans who post here who must be either UConn fans who are loyal to him or maybe even know him and support him. I am sorry but he just has not shown to be good enough for the NBA.
Look at what actually happened. He showed some early promise as a rookie. He looked good with that drive down the left side of the lane and then connected with the pull up J. Or he went all the way to the hoop. But then the league put those moves in the book on him. And he was defensed. All he could do after that was throw the ball out of bounds on his penetrations. Then came important games at the end of the season. The Nets were on the verge of an important win in Detroit. In came Marcus in the 4Q. Billings and Hunter used him like a turnstile and took over the game. Then in the playoffs against Toronto, Marcus put the Nets in a big hole in the 2Q that the Nets could not climb out of. After that, Frank did not play Marcus again for the rest of the playoffs. What a horrible coach? name some coaches that would have continued to trust Marcus, don’t bother, there aren’t any. These are facts, please tell me how I am a know nothing hater….believe me, I have no reason to hate Marcus and I do not…I just have seen with my own eyes that he could not get it done."
Rick says:
"Loved Marcus, but guess it did not work out. Hey at least we got our first round pick back. And G-States will probably be higher. Best of luck but i think we just traded away a future all star he is going to dominate in the warriors run n gun offense"
adam.y says: "When this guy turns into the next Steve Nash, don't tell me I didn't warn you.
Wow Thorn is just giving away all our players for peanuts this off-season…….
Seriously a guy with sooo much upside has MUCH more value than a protected 2011 pick…….."
Brian says:
"You need to give a young point guard the FULL responsibility of running a team, and I’m only disappointed that he never got that in NJ, because he’s got tremendous potential. I think he got undue scrutiny about his D…its not like everyone in NJ was playing top flight D. The bottom line is that RT/Kiki/LF had already made their minds up about him last year, and that was that.
He is going to absolutely SHINE in GS’s system."
xcalibur says:
"@adam
you know marcus cant guard to save his life right? well then again if your comparing him to steve nash i guess he could be that. what has nash won besides mvps? zippo. mvps mean nothing if your goal is to win a nba title and thats what we want. so let marcus transform into the next nash in GS. its not like he went to the knicks.
there are certain players who need a specific system to make them look good. marcus needed a gs or phx system where he could run around like a chicken with its head cut off and score and not be accountable for the defensive end. big deal they scored lets inbound the ball and score right back. marcus will play nice there but does anyone really think hes a starting pg who you can win a title with? at times i hoped he would be but his defense is horrendous. he gets big men into foul trouble too easily
our philosophy here is that defense wins championships. its no secret that that statement is true. so we need defenders, we want defenders. marcus doesnt fit that mold. look at our recent signings. dooling and najera play tough D at times hayes can play good D as well. hell even vince can step up his D, marcus never did."
Edd says:
"Thank you Frank. Another talented player we drafted that you fail to develop. I would not be surprised that MWilliams will turn to another Nash and we’ll forever regret it because of you. When will Thorn realize that you are not a competent coach to develop rookies and now the whole team is practically made up of rookies. When Kidd got traded and the Nets is waiting for Harris, MWilliams started for I believe 4 games and I think the Nets won all of them. When he comes in a game as back-up, he keeps looking at Frank and I am sure Frank is dictating every moves he makes. How can someone play basketball by the numbers. At GS under Nelson, Williams will be able to play freely as a PG without looking at his coach everytime."
Stevie says: "Well we went 2-2 in these 4 games . He had two good games ( we won ) and two bad ( we lost ) ."
Jabez says: "The reason I am sad to see Marcus go is that he reminded me of Rod Strickland. Both were mid to late first rounders from successful college programs and had silky games, sleepy demeanors, and attitude issues. Rod had about 14,000 points and 8,000 assists in his career, and was traded by the Knicks in his second season for a washed up Mo Cheeks. Who knows what Marcus will do in his career, but at least we got more than the Knicks got for Rod."
Mina says:
"This deal is perfect for marcus. he fits GS to a tee.
nelson is notorious in developing young talent. nash, nowitzki, howard, daniels, ELLIS. GUYS LIKE DAVIS, JACKSON AND HARRINGTON HAVE BEEN REVIVED UNDER HIM.
all this will do is show the incompetence of frank in develioping youngsters. when marcus is shining wiht the warriors this year or the next, management will look at frank and blame him for giving him away cause he wasnt able to handle him.
this kid has talent, without a doubt. all he needs is a team who beleives in him, and a coach who is willing to develop him.
absolute steal for GS. frank will surely pay for it with his job."
Paul says:
"Who are these “young players” that Frank has failed to develop? What kind of talent are we talking about? Was Antoine Wright a superstar player under a different coach? Jason Collins? Brian Scalabrine? Zoran Planinic? Who? What coach could have turned any of these guys into productive players?
What we do know is that under Frank, RJ didn’t get any worse (just hurt), Boone performed better than most imagined, ditto on Krstic until he got hurt. Sean Williams is a beast athletically, but the guy couldn’t stay out of foul trouble (5.4 fouls per 36 minutes). Even if Frank had tried to play him more, Williams’ limitations in this area would have kept him on the bench.
It’s not Frank’s fault that the draft hasn’t yielded that much talent. I love Thorn’s ability to make trades, but drafts aren’t his strong suit.
And seriously, when’s the last time that Thorn made a bad trade? Mikki Moore for a second rounder was good. Boki for Marc Jackson and Linton Johnson? Also good. The Kidd deals (both getting him and trading him away) were great. VC for Zo and 2 #1s? K-Mart for 3 #1s? I have a lot of respect for Thorn’s ability to trade. I think he’s earned it. If he deals away Marcus, I’m trusting him.
I don’t want a team that only has the capability to win 42 games every year for the next five. I’d rather have a crap team for two or three and compete for a championship during the rest. And nothing that the Nets have done so far this off-season makes me think that this plan isn’t a good idea."
What do you think of Marcus Williams?
I have not had many chances to see him play, however, I do have a tape of one of the meetings between the Nets and Warriors last season. I believe Marcus played about 15 minutes total, and took two shots. He focused on cycling the ball around the perimeter, and did not emphasize creating any kind of offense for himself. He did well, but he did in fact look as if he were "playing not to make any mistakes."
What kind of minutes will Marcus receive this year?
Will Monta remain the starting point guard if Marcus blossoms into a MIP candidate?
Will coach Nelson be willing to develop him properly?
Any inside knowledge on what Marcus has worked on preparing for the seaon?
Will the risk of playing both he and Monta at the same time be too great a liability on the defensive end? Will it matter if the offense is roasting?
I believe that Monta will be the starting PG throughout the entire season. However, I suspect Monta will split his minutes at the 1 and 2 spots, while Marcus will receive a wealth of playing time exclusively at point (of course assuming that he plays well).
I apologize if the numerous posts were somewhat redundant, ("lot's of potential, good/bad trade") and I did not mean for this to appear one-sided or biased torwards Marcus Williams, I tried to make it even. Some of the bafoons popping off about how he will never be a good player, failed to spell extremely simple words, such as "the", or "point", and many of the outrageous opinions noted, lacked the sensibilities and common knowledge of your average GSoM'er. ;)
Link: http://www.netsdaily.com/?p=6246
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
18
comments
Comments
I didn't really read all of that
since i’m feeling lazy, but i’ve heard a lot of opinions on MW from Nets hands beforehand.
There’s a lot of mixed emotions. Some people blame the coach for not giving him an opportunity, the Net’s system wasn’t fit for him and that he’ll thrive in GS instead, MW just simply isn’t a good player, etc.
I’m really excited to have Williams on the team, it reminds me of when we first got Matt Barnes, except we’re expecting more from MW. Barnes only hit about 19 three’s in his career before Golden State, and then hit over 100 in his first season as a Warrior. Hopefully Marcus gets that type of increase in his improvement, except mostly on the assists category instead of just the 3-ball.
But yeah, I’m not really worried about the weight problems that NJ fans keep talking about. Nellie will keep Marcus in check when it comes to being fit for the Warriors style of play. A couple Nets fans also mentioned that Marcus has a “bad attitude”; I think when Williams comes to Golden State and sees a fellow ‘badass’ in Stephen Jackson being able to be a leader, he will soon follow.
I still see Monta starting at the point guard position, but they will probably play alongside each other in the middle of games. When Maggette or Jackson gets into foul trouble and goes to the bench, Monta will probably move to the SG position to make up for the scoring while Williams plays the point to keep the offense flowing smoothly. I don’t see that happening all the time though, since we got good SGs and SFs to back up Corey and Jack.
by Five Ten Entertainment on Aug 24, 2008 9:26 PM PDT 0 recs
I didn't read it all either...
You only really need to see the first couple comments to get the gist of things.
I’m with you on the weight issues. I’m only speculating here, but it seems to me that Marcus came to the Nets with the best intentions. I think the front office communicated to him early, that he was going to be their PG of the future, and that was a role he was excited about taking on. However, I think it happened sort of the same way it goes with a bad girlfriend/boyfriend.. After a year or two, people start showing their true colors, a couple things happen here and there, a miscommunication, mixed messages, a disagreement that never gets patched up, so on and so forth..
I’m not putting all the blame on the coach either, it sounds like Marcus expected a more secure role once he got it in his mind that he would take over the starting job some day. I expect his lethargic defense and lack of emotion was fed by his utter misery with the whole situation, and he just felt like, “If they don’t care…why should I?”. Obviously the wrong attitude. But you got to remember this a young man, a human being, and taking a step back and looking at what it really was, you could see how Williams could get depressed, and why he buttered up and slowed down as a second year player.
Generally I don’t like to compare people and places, but the situation reminds me a bit of Tracy McGrady in his first couple of years in the league. You got a young player, clearly talented, and he’s depressed because the coach doesn’t like him and he isn’t getting the attention and help he feels he deserves. Suddenly, he’s out of place. Instead of doing the right thing,(getting in shape, improving his game) he still lacks the maturity and the strength to dictate the situation, so he coils up and just goes with the motions.
I’ve got a good feeling about Williams. I feel like Don Nelson is somebody he is going to respect, and listen to, that he’s going to buy into a system that favors his game, and work to get into shape. Stephen Jackson, Ronny Turiaf, these are guys that are going to have a big influence on Williams and how he plays the game. I can’t really say how excited I am to see he and Ellis grow together as players. As far as being a “bad ass” goes, I don’t see Williams as a guy that’s going to turn around and rearrange your jaw for bumping him out of the lane. I think he was diagnosed with BrandanWrightoritis… A dull, painfully emotionless indifference to the game…
I don’t think the fans in Joisey had much “excitement” to offer.. other than listening to rats taking turns farting in the rafters, or sneaking looks at Beyonce while Jay Z signs some kid’s kicks, I can’t see how ANYBODY could get excited about playing there… Even the F***ing team wants to leave!
We’ll see how he responds to:
A. A coach instructing and actually playing him, instead of ridiculing him and neglecting him.. (Awe! No Fair! Marky awe! I know it sounds corny, but it’s true)
B. Stephen Jackson slappin his head and Ronny Turiaf throwing him around in frenzied celebration after a big play.
C. Having a great teammate like Monta to learn from. Monta setting a great example for Williams as far as what a young player should be and how to improve in this league. Monta, the strong, silent leader who has been through much, will help Williams grow as a person and player.
D. Playing in an arena like Oracle, with fans who love basketball, and come back year after year with the same crazed enthusiasm that is more reminiscent of a coliseum in ancient Rome, than the NBA.
Sorry about the angst, I’m obviously excited about this prospect, and the uncostly price we paid to attain him. Point guards who are capable of averaging 8-10 assists a game don’t come around often enough, and he’s got a chance to be one of those players, now.
by JakeGittes on
Aug 24, 2008 11:49 PM PDT
up
0 recs
comparing him with T-Mac
I see your point about Nets fans saying that Marcus has attitude problems. Like you said, Marcus probably didn’t even want to try anymore because he felt it was pointless.
With the comparison, I feel that we had a player just like that not too long ago… Patrick O’Bryant.
I know mostly all Warriors fans say that POB sucks, but in my opinion I feel that Pat has great potential. Many people (including Nellie) say that POB has attitude problems and that he doesn’t try; when you think about it, that’s like the same situation with MW in Jersey. There’s was no point of POB trying since no matter what he’d always be on the bench or in the D-league. He had a great game against the Clippers, but had no reward for the performance, he was back on the bench in the following games.
by Five Ten Entertainment on
Aug 25, 2008 3:32 AM PDT
up
0 recs
yes
I agree about Patrick O’Bryant. It is easy for a young man to get discouraged when his coach simply wants him to go away. I was at the game against the Clippers and I was puzzled just like you are about the decision to sit Patrick after that performance. I think you’re right about his potential, and there are some nice edges to his game. I was particularly impressed with the fact that O’Bryant already owns a sky-hook that he can consistently convert from out to 10 feet. Rarely do I see a big man go off of one foot and release it that high above his shoulder, these days. He’s not the toughest kid, and it would be more than a stretch to say he’s aggressive. But he has the qualities to be a starting center in the league. I definately saw an improvement from rookie year to soph. He may not have been ready, but there was improvement.
by JakeGittes on
Aug 25, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
up
0 recs
It’s all about confidence for young players.
The Warriors are a bad team when it comes to keeping young players’ confidence up (or at least were in the recent past, Nelson said he will change that, and I hope he keeps true to his word).
There are two ways a rookie can be handled.
a) Not being played, which will put his confidence in the team and maybe himself down, especially if he was a high pick with high expectations. The exceptionally mentally strong players can overcome this though.
b) Being played, which if he plays badly will put his confidence in himself down, if he plays well will shoot it up, but wouldn’t put his confidence in the team down because he would feel like he is getting a fair shot.
If he thinks the problem he isn’t getting playing time is because of his play, he will work harder. If he thinks the problem is because the team won’t play him no matter what he does, he will end up like Patrick O’Bryant. I wish Patrick success in Boston.
I believe someone like Marco Belinelli could come back, but the Warriors crushed his swagger. They reined in his inner gunner. He shot the ball knowing it would go in, now he seems content to play so he doesn’t upset his teammates. By no means am I saying he can’t get his swagger back, but the pressure compounds on him every shot he takes because he no longer feels invincible.
When I watch the Blazers play this year and (assuming they give him a fair shot) watch Rudy Fernandez play, I will believe that that is what Belinelli could have been and no one can convince me otherwise. There’s still time though.
Also I don’t like the notion that the Warriors see their players in practice, so they know if they are ready better than anybody. Nobody knows if they are ready except themselves. There are plenty of players who don’t perform well in practice because the practices don’t have enough intensity to keep the player focused. Everything we saw from Brandan Wright in the regular season last year was very, very promising. So I still don’t know how he wasn’t “ready.” You don’t always practice how you play.
End rant.
by belilaugh on
Aug 25, 2008 5:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
that is what Belinelli could have been and no one can convince me otherwise
Maybe you could watch some tapes of him stinking up the court? Just wanting "swagger " doesn’t mean you deserve it. and If he can’t play at NBA speed then all the swagger in the world won’t make him good.
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Aug 25, 2008 9:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I get it dude. You won’t respect any NBA player unless they are an established star with prototypical body types.
by belilaugh on
Aug 26, 2008 7:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
that is what Belinelli could have been
I doubt we’ll ever see Bellinelli dunk on Dwight Howard’s head.
Rudy’s the real deal!
by miguelito on
Aug 26, 2008 4:46 AM PDT
up
0 recs
You got me there. That was a legit dunk. Though Howard was a little late so I don’t like to hear he was “posterized,” it was more Rudy elevating faster than Howard could react and throwing it down quickly. Like I said though, legit.
by belilaugh on
Aug 26, 2008 7:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
It's only been one season
How crushed could Bellinelli been? How did Nelson destroy him already? Most rookies don’t play much, ESPECIALLY mid-1st round Euros, ESPECIALLY ESPECIALLY mid 1st-round Euros playing for Don Nelson, who doesn’t exactly play rookies a lot usually.
If Marco is supposed to be good, he can get his game “back”. 1 so-so rookie year doesn’t mean much, especially when every other Euro, EVER, had a so-so first season. It takes time to learn the NBA.
Of course, like I love to point out, Marco was never even good in Europe, so if it becomes good in the NBA it will be the first time in his career he has been good. So, yeah. If he was a raw 7 footer still learning his body that’s one thing…
HOWEVER, if you think he will be good, don’t let a bad rookie year discourage you! If he was ruined by one poor rookie year, then he wasn’t mentally strong enough in the first place. Every player not named Lebron struggles as a rookie and it doesn’t mean they will ALWAYS suck. Marco could grow and expand his game and be a good player, rookie year notwithstanding.
Martell Webster had a difficult time with his first two seasons, really losing his confidence. He should have gone to college instead of jjumping right to the NBA. Finally, he shook it off, grew up some, and worked to overcome his loss of confidence. He won the starting SF spot for the Blazers and has built upon that success.
So if Marco is able to be good, one year isn’t enough to ruin someone.
And HOW did Nelson ruin Marco, aside from not playing him? You guys got some pretty good guards (especially last year with Baron), there wasn’t exactly a lot of minutes to give the kid.
If ya got faith in him, just give him time.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Aug 26, 2008 6:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
First off, I never said he was destroyed forever. I am saying that he could have came in and been a role player immediately. The reason I feel for him so much is because the same thing happened to me freshman year on my soccer team. I still came back junior and senior year and was pretty dominant (if I may brag a little bit) but I came in with the mentality that I was better than everyone else and not playing made me doubt my own abilities. It took me quite a while to get my confidence back. So I don’t understand why some coaches can’t give their young players a shot, deeming them too young and not ready. There are multiple types of mental toughness. Most players in the NBA are able to bounce back from ups and downs concerning their performances on the court. But usually when they don’t get to play it ends up in a trade and people bringing up phrases like “fresh start” and all that.
Like I said, “I believe someone like Belinelli could come back.” But that doesn’t mean I agree with Nelson’s philosophies. I’m sorry if you think I dissed your boy Rudy or something by comparing the two, but I think he will get a chance to play in Portland, his defense won’t be that good, but he will be allowed to do his thing and it will make his defensive effect minimal. People usually exaggerate how bad players are at defense. Unless you are specifically known as a defensive stopper like Battier, the more you are known as a scorer the less you are thought of as a defender. The best way for Belinelli to pick up NBA defense is to play.
And he may not be mentally strong enough to be a star, but you don’t need that much mental toughness to be a role player. Right now the only shots he will make consistently are the ones he shouldn’t make. This is a testament to his low confidence I believe, because the good things about the impossible shots is no one gets frustrated if you miss them. People say he has poor shot selection, which is true, but it got even worse when he started hiding in the corners during the times he would actually play and only take off balance shots.
Nelson would send him into games only to employ the Hack-A-Shaq strategy on players. And then take him out when he had too many fouls or the opposing coach took their player out.
And there were more minutes to give him than he was given. We had a six man rotation by the end of the year, you don’t think someone else sitting on the bench could have helped? Of course, no one on the bench besides Azubuike was prepared to play since Nelson rode his starters so hard in the beginning of the season. Playing Belinelli and other bench players could have helped a lot in the long run and may have even prevented our collapse.
I still believe he could be a contributor as early as this year, don’t get it twisted. But when I see Rudy Fernandez perform (unless he just sucks) I will think that is what Belinelli could have offered in his rookie season.
by belilaugh on
Aug 26, 2008 7:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
since i’m feeling lazy, but i’ve heard a lot of opinions on MW from Nets HANDS beforehand.
wow, what a typo. I meant to say:
since i’m feeling lazy, but i’ve heard a lot of opinions on MW from Nets fans beforehand.
by Five Ten Entertainment on
Aug 25, 2008 3:26 AM PDT
up
0 recs
He will thrive in Don Nelson’s Run N’ Gun style.
Marcus Williams, just watch. This SIG won't be deleted till Warriors make the playoffs.
by AKA JustPlainOldDubsFan on Aug 25, 2008 6:56 PM PDT 0 recs
belilaugh, i hear you
i was just watching the tape of last preseason, just after training camp, and barnett was gushing about belinelli’s overall skillset, his passing, court vision, shot, etc. and said something about how he could achieve greatness. and i made the same connection with rudy fernandez about what beli could’ve been if he had been treated well
by steelekord on Aug 25, 2008 8:34 PM PDT 0 recs
Marcus williams..
For some reason I really like him being on our team. I think his play is just going to be on the upside and we’re going to have to add him onto our core of rising young talent.
does anyone else feel this way?
Dunleavy's #1 Fan !!!
by KMC on Aug 27, 2008 10:54 AM PDT 0 recs
does anyone else feel this way?
No, they don’t
Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me
by Skeptic con Urquell on Aug 27, 2008 9:19 PM PDT 0 recs
Not to be a downer
But… keep your expectations low with Marcus Williams.
There are good reasons he fell in the draft and fell out of favor with the Nets (who were originally glad that he fell to them in the draft). Aside from the stolen laptop thing in college, he had many attitude and WEIGHT concerns.
He has been lazy, with a bad work ethic. I don’t trust players who don’t keep themselves in shape. He reportedly hasn’t shown any improvement in practice, both in running the PG spot and knowing when and how to shoot.
He has had decision making problems both on and off the court.
Point is, keep the expectations low. He’s got a LOT to prove.
Marcus Williams definitely has talent, but attitude and poor work ethic are not good combinations. He’s going to get his shot, and maybe he deals better with being handed the position over having to earn it. I also know you gotta be positive right now but I think it’s better to be realistic about the situation and be happy when the player exceeds expectations.
Williams, with his history, is more likely to dissappoint.
It’s different than Capt. Jack, who was a good player with temper problems. Marcus hasn’t played very well before.
I hope the Warriors keep looking for that PG to pair with Monta. That’s why seeing if Livingston has anything left is a good idea, because his size and playmaking could go perfectly alongside Monta.
I also hope Marcus has turned things around and thrives now that he’s being thrust in the spotlight. Just have Plan B ready, front office!
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Aug 28, 2008 1:03 AM PDT 0 recs















