Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Wendel Clark Day Is Here Bar-right-arrows



Josh Smith has an offer sheet

It looks like the Memphis Grizzles have made an offer for Josh Smith.

http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wiretap/

Now I remember seeing that the Warriors, Memphis and Atlanta were rumored to be in the mix in a 3-way trade that would send Josh Smith to the Warriors. Does this mean that the Warriors could trade straight up with Memphis for Smith? Memphis does have salary cap room and they have shown extreme interest in Brandon Wright. Do you think a package deal of Harrington and Wright for Smith would work? What do you all think?

 

 

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

0 recs | Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

We would need to throw in some more players to balance out the salaries. Just the two players cant get J Smooth and adding anyone else makes the trade not worth it. And if we DID get JSmooth, he’d be getting paid more than Monta and he’s supposed to be the leader of his team. It would cause chemistry problems. And a front court of Beans, Smooth, and Randolph may seem good, but in reality, that can’t get us a championship, not enough size in the front court to grab the boards. Beans and JSmooth are too alike to be playing together.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Aug 8, 2008 10:28 AM PDT   0 recs

and ENOUGH with the JSmooth to the Warriors talks. It’s not happening, deal with it. Just like how Baron Davis left for LA, it happened, deal with it. And J Rich ain’t coming back to the Dubs anytime soon, deal with it.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Aug 8, 2008 10:29 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Biedrins and Smith are alike in that they’re both basketball players who are much taller than your average human.

In most other respects, they aren’t similar at all. Smith makes his offensive living with a jumper that in all honesty isn’t very good and isn’t an efficient scorer. He’s an adequate rebounder as a combo forward. He’s a nasty shot blocker and a great athlete who is reported to be a superior defender.

Biedrins converts at a high percentage on anythng he gets his hands on inside. He can be a good (but not great) shot blocker, but seems to avoid it because of foul issues. Biedrins is one of the better rebounders in the game.

by jae on Aug 8, 2008 12:12 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

lol

i don’t buy this that Josh and Andris are too much alike. they are 2 completely different players in many ways. Josh is capable of playing the 3 and Andris is well.. Andris. Josh is so freakishly explosive and Athletic for his size. Another thing. That frontcourt won’t get us a championship?? And what you are assuming Brandon Wright at the 4 will eventually get us one?

by Agent Zero on Aug 8, 2008 2:53 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

We are not getting dis guy

But Memphis may be a fun team to watch if they do land him. Conley, OJ Mayo, Rudy Gay and Josh Smith would be a good unit to have. I’d be juiced with that lineup

Put a little mustard on it

by The Barnes Supremacy on Aug 8, 2008 10:38 AM PDT   0 recs

You

forget Marc Gasol

by boomdizzleness on Aug 8, 2008 11:52 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

U right...

I also forgot about Antoine Walker, Marco Jaric and Darko. Outright scary when u think about it. How can we possibly compete with that? lol :)

Put a little mustard on it

by The Barnes Supremacy on Aug 8, 2008 1:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah

But Marc Gasol is supposed to be a great player.

by boomdizzleness on Aug 8, 2008 7:43 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

great?

good I think, I dont know about great. They also have that Darko guy who everyone thought was gonna be a great player. The first 4 guys are ridiculously quick though. Add Lowry, Warrick off the bench and Iavaroni has a team that suits his style pretty well.

by sam23 on Aug 11, 2008 10:45 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

yup

they might join the list of future young powers in the west. With Minny, OKC, and obviously Portland already looking very good and very young nearly every team in the West looks poised to be either very good now or has the potential to be very good soon. (Denver excluded)

by sam23 on Aug 11, 2008 10:43 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

im jealous..what if we waited??

no were not getting j smoov..this crap does make me jealous tho..for depth purposes i can live with the maggette deal but part of me is saying this is a knee jerk reaction. if ATL does NOT match they memphis got a steal that could have been us had we waited..then the bay would have been sitin pretty and ill be pissed at mully..it will all be a moot point however when atl matches..

by IndubitableBayAreaGM on Aug 8, 2008 10:55 AM PDT   0 recs

Also

He’s getting paid pretty much the same As Monta too, he’s got 58 mil/5 years

Monta has 67 mil / 6 years. So it’s not even a quarter mil difference.

by boomdizzleness on Aug 8, 2008 11:59 AM PDT   0 recs

He’s getting paid pretty much the same As Monta ?

I wonder if Warriors management explored the possibilities of getting Smith for that money before signing Montay? Does anyone think Mullin is capable of doing two things at once??

Till I get free
I live my life in the Walmart
Cholesterol chasin me

by Skeptic con Urquell on Aug 8, 2008 2:14 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

We didn’t need to be concerned with the cap for Monta because of his Bird rights. We would have had to clear the cap room for Smith. The only time that sort of offer could realistically have been made was before Maggs was signed. At the time, I think Smith thought he’d get more money.

by jae on Aug 8, 2008 2:48 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed, also...

It would have been a very risky move at that point in the offseason considering the fact that he is resricted and we had so many holes to fill. We could have tied up all our cap space for a week only to see ATL match and be left where we started but with most of the FA’s signed already. I’m pretty happy that we went the way we did.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Aug 8, 2008 3:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

unless Maggs was going to head back to LAC or take significantly le$$ to play for a contender, it would not have changed much … we’ll never know of course

by hardcore on Aug 8, 2008 4:16 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Well...

Until we signed him it was looking like he was going to the Spurs for the MLE. It’s easy to look back and say things wouldn’t have changed much but if the scenario I presented happened I’m guessing a bunch of people would probably have been calling for Mullin’s head.

It’s also pretty clear that each move sends ripples through free agency so changing one part would most likely change a lot. For instance if Childress does not accept his Euro offer, then Atl doesn’t make a move for Evans and we end up with him and the Clips end up with Buike. Josh’s decision affected at least three NBA franchises. Also, if we didn’t make a hard play for Brand and in doing so held up his talks with LA, Philly might not have even entered the conversation before Brand re-signed with LA. Like you said, we will never know how things may have played out because there are too many variables.

All things considered I’m not sure I would have had the balls to gamble on landing Smith at the begining of free agency unless ATL was sending out some smoke signals that they were not going to match. Plus as jae said he was probably looking for a bigger contract before most of the teams spent all thier money.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Aug 8, 2008 4:39 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

butterfly effect!

by Psion on Aug 8, 2008 5:21 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

right, that was the first line of the comment – “unless … “

- looking back at it that was not a very well constructed comment – kinda like “unless it’s cloudy it will be sunny out … ” (unless you’re in Beijing!)

also we agree about Mullin

by hardcore on Aug 8, 2008 6:31 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah,

I wasn’t really trying to dispute what you said, I was just expanding on the thought. =)

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Aug 11, 2008 11:16 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It is highly unlikely that we’d trade for Smith if he’s signed the offer sheet. Newly signed free agents cannot be signed unless it’s a sign-and-trade, and that would require ATL to have done the signing. If Memphis gets him, he’s there until at least December. If ATL matches, he has a no-trade clause he can invoke for a year.

It is not realistic to think that we’re in any way shape or form getting Smith from Memphis.

by jae on Aug 8, 2008 12:09 PM PDT   0 recs

Yes

but doesn’t is seem likely that he’s gonna the Hawks will resign him? I think this pretty much takes out the notion of him joining the dubs

by bayareaballa on Aug 8, 2008 12:13 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

atlanta will match

and he will still be on the hawks.

by Young Moolah on Aug 8, 2008 12:11 PM PDT   0 recs

Now we can

Accurately make a guess at what it would take to get Smith. 5 years @ 58 total… we know exactly how much he is going to make and how much we need to ship out in order to get him. $11 total? Al… Wright… Bellinelli… basically the entire 07 draft (Lasme? Nice try…) plus a fantastic role player for a young talent with some good skills. Even that? I would dare to say that is too much. I KNOW ITS BEEN SAID HUNDREDS OF TIMES ON THIS BLOG but Ill say it again: stick with the core that we have and move on. Nice thought… aint going to happen

by pinkycheal on Aug 8, 2008 12:25 PM PDT   0 recs

you forget BYE

means we have to ship out 5.5 mil, and we don’t have anything at that value that’d interest atl. and it’d put us over lux tax.

by noava22 on Aug 8, 2008 12:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

We cannot ship anything out for him now. It can’t be done. It’s not a matter of will. It’’s a matter of the rules. He will be a member of either the Hawks or Memphis until December at the earliest.

by jae on Aug 8, 2008 1:12 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

ATL will match...

so what’s the point, really?

by It's Prounounced Mon-Tay on Aug 8, 2008 4:02 PM PDT   0 recs

we shouldn’t assume Atl will match – didn’t we learn anything from Baron’s bolting south?

in this case, Atlanta is not among the elite franchises in the league as far as executive decision making

your point stands – there’s seems to be no path for Smith to end here even if we wanted him

by hardcore on Aug 8, 2008 4:22 PM PDT   0 recs

yea

but smith is restricted, Baron wasn’t

by boomdizzleness on Aug 8, 2008 5:22 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

right you are, and we pulled Turiaf from LA – my point is that we should learn our lesson about assuming

by hardcore on Aug 8, 2008 6:27 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

No, but there’s a big difference between Turiaf and Smith and the situation that ATL and LAL are in. LAL would have been over the tax to keep Turiaf who was a reserve for them. They look to have a much better bigs in Bynum and Gasol and Odom. Mihm is still under contract, so they have a backup 5 and, provided Bynum is healthy again, Odom looks to be swinging between the 3 and 4 with backup minutes at the 4 when Gasol rests or plays the 5. Turiaf was a good backup for them, but at 9 million—what he’d cost since they’re over the tax, he’s a luxury and one that shouldn’t make a significant impact on their final record.

ATL is not in danger of the tax. They are, without Smith, in danger of being confused with an NBDL club. OK, that’s a stretch, but Smith was one of the most important parts in their being moderately successful in the east. He’s young, he’s perceived as a star. I think he’s perceived as being better than he is, but he’s certainly a good player, one who makes his team better than having him play somewhere else. If he’s gone, especially with Childress munching on gyros full time, they’re asking Marvin Williams to pull triple duty at the forward slots. Their front line becomes Pachulia, Horford and Williams when he swings over to play out of position at the 4 backed up by guys signed for the NBA minimum who may not even be worth that. They won’t be far enough under the cap to sign anyone worth half a damn to replace him and they’re already short on players under contract.

If ATL doesn’t match, they’re conceding that they’re going to suck and that they don’t really have interest in playing halfway competitive basketball. Assumptions can get you lost, but there should be riots on Peachtree St if they don’t match that offer for Smith.

by jae on Aug 8, 2008 7:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Hawks Match

Looks like the Hawks went ahead and matched. No big surprise here.

"...OlympicMike is clearly the Barack Obama of GSoM"-Sleepy

by olympicmike on Aug 8, 2008 8:13 PM PDT   0 recs

hahaha

that was quick…

by Young Moolah on Aug 8, 2008 9:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

shit

I know I am little buzz right now, but damn we could had sign him thou. 58 millions??? we could gave him 60 millions or trade trade Al and Brandan Wright and a first round pick for him. Personally, the Hawks are front offices are full dumbass if they let him walk. Well, it took them long enough.

by warriorfan4life on Aug 9, 2008 2:06 AM PDT   0 recs

It is not clear that Smith would have accepted an offer earlier. Remember, it’s not the offer that’s important. It’s getting a player to accept the offer. Earlier in free agency, Smith had a possibility for more bidders and valued himself higher. Then those suitors went away and ATL didn’t seem in a rush to get something done. With only Memphis out there, the real question was

I do not believe we were never in a position where Smith was going to accept such an offer. Timing is important and the timing of the offer meant that we’d have had to have held off on signing Monta and Biedrins and Turiaf and Maggs and probably lost Azubuike if we wanted to wait for the Smith price to drop to where it did, a price ATL was more than willing to match.

There was NEVER an opportunity to trade if ATL didn’t want something we had (stop trying to foist Al back to a team that didn’t want him when they had him) and it would have certainly cost more in salary than what he wound up getting as well..

by jae on Aug 9, 2008 7:48 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Congrats to Memphis for the most half-a$sed attempt to sign a big-name free agent this summer.

Considering Joe Johnson makes around $13.5 m/year, why would the Grizzlies only offer around $11 m/year for a player of Josh Smith’s caliber? Could the Grizzlies have TRIED to make it easier for the Hawks to re-sign Smith?

by The Daydreamer on Aug 9, 2008 2:26 AM PDT   0 recs

It was a no risk offer. They more or less decided that they didn’t like this year’s FA crop. They don’t have anyone that they had to keep on their own roster due a big raise who would make their cap room use-it-or-lose-it like we did. They thought he was worth that price and if they got him for it, it would be a deal. If not, it didn’t impact their plans. Smith got tired of waiting for an offer that ATL wasn’t quick in getting to him, so, after the suitors interested in overbidding went for other options dried up, he took the only leverage he had left. Smith didn’t have to sign the offer sheet. Don’t blame anything on the Griz.

Frankly, $11mil a year for Smith is a risk if he doesn’t improve. He’s not nearly the dominant force that so many here seem to make him out to be. He’s a tweener forward, a good one, but still somewhat limited as a result. He’s shown a very, very flat improvement curve since he got to the league. It may mean he’s due for a breakout, but it may also mean that what you see is what you get, and frankly, it’s not 11mil a year productivity yet.

by jae on Aug 9, 2008 7:53 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Considering how people keep defending that you have to overpay for restricted free agents

wouldn’t it have made sense for Memphis to overpay Smith to lure him from the Hawks? IMO, according to the market (Biedrins, Monta, Deng, etc) $11m/year is just right for Smith, an extraordinary player who most likely hasn’t even reached his prime. And of those three RFE examples I gave, it was the players’ own teams who re-signed them, meaning they didn’t have to outbid another team for those players, meaning they didn’t have to overpay so another team couldn’t match their offer. Considering how if Memphis actually made a legit offer to sign away Smith, a potential superstar and arguably the most valuable long-term piece for Atlanta (JJ is in his prime right now, Smith most likely hasn’t reached his), they would have to pay Smith more than his fair market value, which means Memphs would have to offer more than $11 m/year, which is absolutely fair for the Hawks, meaning it probably took the Hawks about 0.2 seconds to match Memphis’ “offer”. I say “offer” because I read on ESPN there were reports Memphis made this offer, knowing absolutely well Atlanta would match. Memphis was offering because they were getting criticisms of being cheap and they wanted to refute those claims. Also, consider how a player who was similar to Smith, Kirilenko (he was re-signed by his own team to a, I believe, max contract in his prime), made $13.7m last year. Of course Atlanta would match the $11m/year offer.

by The Daydreamer on Aug 10, 2008 1:22 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It would only make sense to “overpay” if they were dead set committed to having Smith play for them. If they were taking a flier, a low chance of working “what the hell, maybe ATL really won’t pay for him” gamble, then “overpaying” wasn’t important. They didn’t care that much if they got him or not, but really only wanted him if he was at a perceived bargain. The offer sheet gives Memphis a totally meaningless something to say to their tiny fan base while they waste a year losing games again, but they didn’t really expect it to work.

I think the opinion of Smith is grossly inflated personally and think Memphis would have been foolish to blow their cap space for him. I do not think he’s an ‘exceptional’ player. He’s a ‘potential’ superstar, but there are more ‘potential’ superstars than there are superstars, and the coversion rate from potential to full blown is pretty low. If you pay based on what you think someone will become in the future, you’re going to get burned more often than not. It’s a good way to keep your team bad. Smith may not have reached his prime, but what he has shown is a pretty flat improvement curve. He’ll get better, but I suspect what you see is close to what you get.

by jae on Aug 10, 2008 10:18 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Devil's advocate.

Maybe you put Josh Smith on a better team than the Hawks, a team with a point guard, and maybe the curve begins to climb. I’m not a Josh Smith fan, but he’s a young player who played on a terrible team the majority of his short career. COULD this be why he hasn’t improved as much as some expected?

by JakeGittes on Aug 10, 2008 3:02 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Possible, but the number of players who get better in the presence of other, better players is pretty small.

The Hawks weren’t terrible last year. They were mediocre. They had some good positive points. They had some young, talented players, a variety of scoring options, and managed to get a guy who can run an offense by the end of the year. They had a very, very, promising young big in the middle. Smith wasn’t a different player last year with the mediocre Hawks than he was a couple of years ago with the abysmal Hawks. Banking on him being a better player with a point guard around is still a risky investment.

by jae on Aug 10, 2008 10:20 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Perhaps I've had a bit too much of the bottle as well, but...

This is twice now where the Grizzlies’ management has been so horrendous that it appears shady to the point of collusion. I don’t understand this move from the perspective of Memphis or Josh Smith, but at least Smith is getting paid. What can you say about the Grizzlies?

I love how Atlanta matched the offer IMMEDIATELY. I can see the new Atlanta GM, sitting in his office and hearing news of the offer sheet, thinking….”Really? That’s it?? Ok, we accept.” If the secretive and divisive Atlanta Spirit Ownership group can put together $58M in a matter of hours, it must be WAY below market value, right?

by UncleCliffy on Aug 9, 2008 2:38 AM PDT   0 recs

Memphis figured: “what the hell. Let’s float an offer. So what if he doesn’t take it? We were content to let the cap room roll over to next year anyhow. So if he doesn’t take it, we’re no worse off. If he takes it and ATL matches, we’re no worse off. If he takes it and we get him, well, then we’ve changed direction but it’s a price we’re happy with. What, you mean he TOOK that offer? Wow. Never figured that he’d do that. OK, so it’s matched. We’re still where we wanted to be, waiting for next year’s FA crop.”

Smith (or his agent) figured: “Damn, I’m worth way more. I didn’t even entertain offers this low a month ago, but who else is gonna give it to me at this point? Philly went with Brand. LAC doesn’t have that much cash to deal anymore. Warriors and Clips spend their change when I still wanted $12 or $13 per. So if this is the offer coming in, either we hold out for ATL to boost an offer or we’re looking at the qualifying offer for a year before unrestricted free agency. And that means that the offer next year has to be even bigger than what I wanted this year or I’m coming out short by taking a low salary for the season.”

by jae on Aug 9, 2008 8:00 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

But the Grizzlies let Atlanta off the hook in what had been a very tricky spot for Hawks management. They didn’t want Smith to take the qualifying offer b/c he would play one year and bolt. They weren’t going to offer $70M+. Atlanta wanted the Grizzlies to offer that deal. Isn’t this best case scenario for Atlanta? This offer is matched 99 times out of 100. Why would you do such a favor for an opponent (albeit one from the other conference)??

by UncleCliffy on Aug 9, 2008 1:45 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i don't think

that anyone has a huge need to stick it to the hawks’ management. they’re plenty capable of screwing things up on their own, thank you very much, even if the the grizz did sort of let them off the hook.

by cap'n hack on Aug 9, 2008 3:56 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

+1

It almost feels like I should just go around “rec”ing every signel one of JAE’s posts. People don’t seem to get the ideas presented. Let me try to paraphrase:

1. ATL didn’t want Al Harrington 2 years ago. And they don’t want him now.
2. Josh Smith signed an offer sheet. Nobody held a gun to his head.
3. If ATL is willing to pay him the $$ on that offer sheet, they could have just negotiated to that point anyways.
3a. Memphis’ offer sheet helps ATL in no way whatsoever.
3b. The offer might have helped Josh Smith get to a more amenable contract with ATL, as he had almost no leverage prior to having the 11M/year offer.

I hope that wasn’t too complicated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 11, 2008 5:38 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Maybe memphis was trying to convince Atl to do the sign and trade.

Remember how a couple weeks ago there was a three way sign and trade between the Grizz Hawks and Dubs. Memphis likes Wright and they could use Al’s veteran leadership and production from the 3 or 4. Maybe they were/are trying to pressure them into a sign and trade proposal. Smith wants out maybe they’ll trade him somewhere in a few months

by droppin gsw _knowledge south bay style on Aug 9, 2008 7:31 PM PDT   0 recs

This is not part of a sign and trade proposal. If you match an offer sheet, it cannot be part of a sign and trade and no negotiations about the match or any subsequent dealings are permitted once an offer has been made. If there’s a trade, it wouldn’t have been until December.

This was all about Memphis saying, “why not?” and Smith, seeing less and less out there, figuring that this was enough money to make it worth while.

by jae on Aug 9, 2008 9:08 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Smith is going back to his nest

in the ATL

The Time Is Now! Win Warriors Win!

by ballin on Aug 9, 2008 11:45 PM PDT   0 recs

Undervaluing Cap Space and Josh Smith

Josh Smith blocks more shots than any non-center in the game. There were a lot of good shot blockers on the Hawks in Horford and Childress. Smith is also gifted with quick hands grabbing 1.5 steals per game which fuels the Warriors tempo. He can create his own shot because he has an inside/outside game. At 22, its hard to argue that he’s reached his plateau. He has had a dramatic improvement in FG% and PPG each year. I don’t understand how he can be characterized as a low-efficiency scorer with a 45.7% last year. Is that because he dunks so much that his poor outside shooting is evened out? At 6’9” this guy is proto-nellie, a fantastic finisher with a good release on the shot. His respect with the Zebras shows that he can get his steals and blocks and not pick up fouls. Is the argument that we have cheaper, better versions already with Turiaf, Wright or Maggette? Smith actually pulls down rebounds. Maybe his conflicts with his coach and his long relationship with Al are negatives and he would be disgruntled on the Warriors, but his skills are sorely needed on this team, I hope we can get some of that impact with our current roster, but there is little to suggest that will happen anytime in the next 3 years.

With the cap space Mullin enjoyed after Baron’s departure, the Warriors could have played the field more. Signing Mags is a real head-scratcher to me with our glut of swingmen. I know the UFA vs. RFA arguments, but I doubt many fans would have called for Mullin’s head if he let Mags sign for the MLE for the Spurs or Pistons. Targeting Turiaf is different than targeting Deng, Smith, Okafor, or Iguadoula how? I’d rather overpay for a difference-maker. Now, I see us waiting and hoping that Wright or Harrington will be a candidate for most-improved to give us any chance to be competitive.

"We're Menudo," -BB

by eshock on Aug 11, 2008 5:37 AM PDT   0 recs

I'm not so sure about the FG%...

He’s gone from 42.5% to 45.7%, and his 3pt % has gone down from 31% to 25%. It would be respectable for a SF, but as a PF (which he’s listed as and what he’d be asked to play for Nellie if not Center) he was ranked as 20th best (or 9th WORST) qualified shooter based on FG%. When you factor in that guys like Al Harrington, Rasheed Wallace, Troy Murphy, and Antwan Jamison take lots of three pointers, he drops to the 26th best (or 3rd WORST) shooter based on adjusted FG% (It takes the points scored by FG and divides by the number of FGAs, thus boosting the effect of a 3pter). He only beats out Jeff Green and Drew Gooden on that score. So, yeah… his shooting is pretty horrible for a PF. It would also put him in the bottom five for SFs. Does he get to the line? Some, but not enough and he doesn’t shoot great once he gets there.

On rebounding, it seems like he does alright. But he is on the floor forever, which inflates those numbers when you compare them to his peers. On a per minute bases, he’s much more pedestrian. He rebounds at a slightly better rate than Matt Barnes (11.1Reb/48).

Turiaf was on a team that was already well over the cap. He was (and still is) a secondary piece. Not the type of player that teams like to pay double for. Deng, Smith, Okafor, and Iguodola on the other hand are franchise type players. Players that fans get upset if you just let them leave. Players that are not lesser duplicates of something you already have. The key to the Turiaf signing is that WE’RE not overpaying for him, but LA would have been if they signed him to that contract in the luxury tax.

All in all, I’d be happy to have him for 11M/year. But that was never an option. Look how fast ATL matched Memphis’ offer.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 11, 2008 6:12 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

good counterpoints

i really haven’t watched him enough last year to judge his overall game night in night out. but, he is a spectacular player you build a franchise around. we chose monta. that’s okay. i think we are extremely weak in the post.

"We're Menudo," -BB

by eshock on Aug 11, 2008 5:41 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Well... we know that.

We will be weak in the post unless BWright and/or Turiaf shows he can take starters’ minutes and let Al roam in the 3/4 spot as a scorer/6th man. Al would be a very effective change of pace kind of player, but as a starter, he doesn’t rebound or defend well enough (unless it’s Yao!) and gets taken advantage of by the big bruiser types.

Anyways, Josh Smith has shown that he’s got talent, but no control. He doesn’t know his limits (which is a very, very underrated talent for all people everywhere). He thinks he can be a jumpshooter, a 3pt shooter, and an offensive threat. The fact of the matter is, he’s a gifted athlete and a good defender. Until he shows that he’s capable of accepting his limitations, he’ll forever be a “potential” guy. He hasn’t graduated from that phase yet. He does lots of good things on the court, but he’s doesn’t belong in the “The Man” category where you give him whatever he wants to play for your team.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 12, 2008 9:47 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
AL for Jamal Crawford???
Small
Why the Warriors are Doomed: (Rowell edition)
Small
Jack signs extension and Nets trade off (for now)
Small
Rumor: Marco Belinelli to.... Nets?
Small
To the Moderators of GSM, THANK YOU

Recent FanPosts

Small
Gotta love the trade though
Small
Al Harrington states his trade to NYK " is a dream come true... "
Small
Once again... Randolph!
L_cc6eaae41407ce51e4158c52185c8c03_small
I Hate ESPN
Small
Monta next??
59_warriors_logo_small
Zach Randolph to the Clippers
Gs206_small
What impact does you believe this will have on the West?
Small
Thanks, Al
Small
Rumor: 3 Way Trade with Knicks and Clippers
Small
Al for friggin Malik Rose?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Ads


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Prettytonycopy-1_small Tony.psd

Bily11_small YaoButtaMing

ad

Site Meter