So hooked on economics is Dumars, an agent testifies, he was prepared to deal treasured Tayshaun Prince for Stephen Jackson whose contract was set to terminate after next season. When the Warriors committed to New Jack City for a three-year extension, Detroit's purported proposal came off the table.
10 months ago
saintdee
7 comments
1 recs |
Comments
do you
believe? if this was true. Rowell and Mullin or whoever is in control is a effin idiot.
But since it came from the NY post its hard for me to believe.
by saintdee on Jan 25, 2009 4:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ehh
I dunno if I prefer Prince over Jax. At the beginning of the season when we were based around Stephen, and he was our #1 option? Yes, I’d rather have Prince.
But Stephen is a comparable scorer and defender. He’s a much better passer, and Nellie loves point forwards. Also, he’s our leader. Prince was more than happy being the quiet guy behind chauncey, rip and rasheed. If we’re going to be the youngest team in the league, we need one of our vets to be a good leader.
by bradyk2 on Jan 25, 2009 5:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Stephen is NOT a comparable defender
"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike
by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 12:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
After what happened with that fight
in Detroit several years ago with Artest and Wallace and the fans, I doubt they would like him up there. Besides, we have enough lanky lefties.
by Captain Jack on Jan 25, 2009 9:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jack is our leader.
No way we should trade Stephen Jackson. He should end his career as a Warrior at the very least, and if we manage to win that championship in 2 to 3 years then we should retire his jersey.
I Believe In Monta Ellis.
by WarriorFanLive on Jan 26, 2009 1:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

















