Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Morrow or Belinelli?

So the more consistent playing time Anthony Morrow gets, the more I love this kid. Same goes for Marco Belinelli, before he got injured he was playing well on both sides of the court. So the question is, would you guys rather have Anthony Morrow or Marco Belinelli? The Warriors back court is unbelievably crowded and it doesn't seem possible for Marco and Anthony to get solid minutes while they are both on the roster. I know their games are not exactly identical, morrow being a better shooter vs Marco's play making ability.


Here's the packed back court:

Monta Ellis

Jamal Crawford

CJ Watson

Anthony Morrow

Marco Belinelli

Marcus Williams

 

Matt Steinmetz writes: link

Bottom line is the Warriors have too many players on their roster 6-foot-6 or under and getting minutes for both those guys is not realistic. And you get the sense if Warriors coach Don Nelson goes with one guy one night and the other guy the next night, that won't be good for anybody.

All in all, Morrow and Belinelli are too similar, at least insofar as the Warriors are currently constructed. Morrow is a better shooter, and Belinelli is a better playmaker, but they both can have a similar type impact on the game when they've got it going.

So what do you guys think!?

 

Poll
Anthony ' i need more ammo" morrow or Marco "rambo/rocky" Belinelli?
I need me some more ammo!
215 votes
Rocky! Rocky!
261 votes
they both can play together on the warriors and be productive
389 votes

865 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

5 recs  |  Comment 240 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

*Boph

I am Greg Oden, i am goingz to be trade to The Warrior. hoooray.

Warriors for life. Raiders till death. And The A's when i get free tickets.

by STIX on Jan 26, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

why we can't we keep both?

we’re stuck with beli for the next few years i think since we picked up his contract.

and we’d be a fool not to pick up morrow’s cheapie contract. win win for us.

by saintdee on Jan 26, 2009 2:23 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

CJ looks like he's geting a bit of recognition around the league...

so trade him and MWill.

develop belli’s playmaking skills more and we have solid backups in Rocky and Sniper A-Mo at the 1 and 2

by Dr. Orpheus on Jan 26, 2009 2:30 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

+1

coaches are starting to notice CJ…

by THIZZ-A-LOT on Jan 26, 2009 1:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Anti-that!

I’ve liked CJ from the get go, even when everyone was hating on him. I wouldnt trade him. if anyone needs to be traded its williams. He is skilled, its just that hes the odd man out. Let him play for a team that will use him. CJ is a money as a back-up pg. Id almost like to see CJ at the 1 and monta at 2 just to see how that would work out. CJ does need to get better defensively tho.

by Butt Secks on Jan 26, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i like CJ too...

but really think, who would get more trade value if offered, CJ or Mwill. Obvious answer being CJ. CJ is naturally an undersized 2, and we definately have an abundance of 2’s already with Monta, capn Jack, Craw, Belli and Morrow.

by Dr. Orpheus on Jan 26, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

CJ is a restricted Free Agent next year. In my opinion he’ll command the Full or most of the MLE which should be around $5.2M.

The Warriors will be in a tough position (not necessarily a bad thing) as they can either extend CJ for the MLE or let him walk. Or they could obviously S/T him, but his perceived value to another team (I.E. His potential as a solid PG/SG combo starter) will have to be high.

So, IF Craw exercises his ETO, CJ walks, and MWill walks, that’ll leave Monta, Belli, Morrow, Kelenna at the wing positions.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 9:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No way does CJ get full or most of the MLE,

a tweener guard who has no court vision and scores alot. Most other gm’s will see another mediocre talent thats a product of Nellie’s system. I would be shocked if he got more than 3 million.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 9:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

IF

Crawford exercises his ETO, I’ll be shocked

and

if he does so and then Dubs don’t extend CJ I’d be surprised

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2009 9:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah if JC opts out then we should keep CJ, or at least trade him for another PG

by FishStix on Jan 27, 2009 12:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

no way could cj get close to the mle.

he’s a nice back up for 15 min a game, but mle is for impact players. cj is a player a coach trust not to f-up to offense while the starter gets a quick rest. ie. brevin knight

by jnormous on Jan 27, 2009 2:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

brevin knight cant shoot

hes made about 50 3;s in his nba carreer. Cj is a great shooter no comparison

by montadaboss on Jan 27, 2009 9:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone says that

But I give C.J. mad props on defense. I’ve seen way more games that he’s gotten at least one steal than he hasn’t. I even noticed his stellar defense in summer league.

by Golden Boy on Jan 27, 2009 5:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

His defense is not good 90% of the time. Opposing players break him down repeatedly which collapses the defense. He gets steals because he plays defense mostly with his hands in trying to get steals by poking at the ball when opposing players blows by him consistently… Just watch him play the pick and roll and watch how our 4 and 5’s always have to cover for him (painful memory of Knicks’ game). Having said all that, none of our 1, 2, 3’s are any good on defense…sigh

by wander7 on Jan 28, 2009 1:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I got to agree with Wander…CJ’s one of THE WORST defenders on our team. Not that he can’t be a great defender, he’s got the size and speed to be adequate, he just gives NO EFFORT.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 28, 2009 6:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Crawford is worse and Jackson might be the most overrated “defender” in the game.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 28, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

On this Warrior team, pretty much everyone can be accused of being a bad defender. I’ve got to agree with JVG, the Warriors have too many players solely focused on the offensive side of the ball. Kind of like Nellie is.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 29, 2009 12:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i completely agree!

maggs + cj + mwilliams for either lamar odom or a PG or annother PF

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Jan 26, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you do the minutes math

146 minutes each game at the 1,2, and 3-
Monta -about 34 minutes
Crawford-about 32 minutes
Jackson-about 34 minutes
Maggette-20 minutes (rest of his minutes at the 4)
CJ-
Buike-
Morrow-
Belinelli-
Williams-0 minutes

If my quick finger counting math is correct, that leaves 26 minutes per game for CJ, Buike, Morrow, and Belinelli combined. Thats 6.5 minutes each. I dont think any of those guys will be real pleased playing 6 minutes a game. Thats tough to squeeze in there and I was being pretty conservative with the minutes allocated to Crawford Jackson and Monta. And I’d prefer to see Maggette playing a lot more wingman minutes and minimize his minutes at the 4. Thats also not giving Randolph any minutes at the 3 (that one I’m ok with)

How would you guys divide up those minutes? Fewer to Monta and Jackson and Crawford? Play Maggette exclusively at the 4? Considering the logjam in the backcourt/wings and the serious hole at the 4 I think the front office HAS to be agressively pursuing a small for big type trade.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 4:31 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

my bad

144 minutes at the 1,2,3 so that leaves 24 minutes (6 mins per game) for CJ, Buike, Morrow, and Beli

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 4:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The fans clamoring for us to “play both” seem unclear on the concept that playing time is a zero sum game.

Scary thing is, your 26 minutes assumes 15 minutes or so by Maggs at PF, which is already less than ideal.

I’m kinda shocked that Morrow is doing as poorly as he is in the poll. As a rookie, in limited PT, he’s already a better-than-average NBA shooting guard. He’s the best 3-pt shooter in the NBA (50.6!!), which given his performance in the ACC and in the LV Summer League, should surprise no one. His true shooting percentage currently stands at 57.8 , better than Kobe’s or Wade’s, a hair below LeBron’s. On top of that, he rebounds well (5.6 per 36), doesn’t turn the ball over (1.0), and works hard on D. By plus/minus and Roland rating (+7.5 and +4.3, respectively), he’s the most effective player on the Warriors, and by a wide margin. He’s now logged 710 minutes of PT — when do we get to say he’s for real? Pair his perimeter game with Monta’s mad driving/finishing/kicking, and you’ve got a credible backcourt tandem for years to come.

I’m similarly sold on Azubuike, who has some of the same qualities as Morrow — more athletic, less deadly from deep, but similarly efficient, active on the boards. And like Morrow, he just seems to be great kid. As both were undrafted, they both have to had to work like demons to get where they are, and it totally shows in the way they carry themselves on court.

Much as I like some of CJ and Marco’s qualities, it only takes a cursory glance at the PT numbers to see that they’re the odd men out. I’d love to curtail Jack and Craw’s numbers, but given their salaries our flexibility in that regard is pretty minimal.

Here’s how I’d like to see it shake down when Wright returns — somewhere between idealistically and realistically…

PG: Monta 24 / Crawford 24
SG: Monta 10 / Morrow 22 / Azubuike 16
SF: Azubuike 6 / Maggette 14 / Jackson 28
PF: Maggette 14 / Wright 24 / Randolph 10
C: Biedrins 34 / Turiaf 14

CJ, Marco, Marcus = 0

Eventually, if and when Randolph learns to pay basketball, I’d love to see him siphon off some of Jack’s PT, with Maggs getting most of his time at SF. And if and when Monta gets more comfortable at PG, we probably need to think about moving Crawford for a warm body of some kind. But that’s down the road … for now: Ciao, Marco, CJ, and Marcus!

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 26, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Please remove the Randolph 10

The guy doesn’t deserve it. He’s quickly becoming a problem in golden state. I won’t pencil in anything more than 5 minutes for him. Maybe if he changes his freakin’ attitude around over the summer then we can talk about 10 or more minutes a night.

A Sonics fan without a team.. Though I'm auditioning GS Warriors this season.

by mcwalter44 on Jan 26, 2009 8:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Really so the last time you spoke to Anthony Randolph was when?

This attitude you speak of? When has he exhibited this behavior? Is this something you read in a Kawakami article? If so you can just discount it to fiction. I have seent his kid interviewed a few times and he always comes off as a good kid with good intensions. You obviously know him btter than the rest of us.

by dungeness crabdribble on Jan 26, 2009 9:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How about you watch him play...

Then read Kawakami (granted Tim’s a bit too conspiracy theory oriented), Marcus Thompson and Geoff Lepper. All of them have reported that the main thing holding Randolph back is his attitude. You can see it on the court. For example at the end of last night’s game he got in around the 4 minute mark of the 4th quarter. He did move around much on offense (saying in his preferred hover mode awaiting to fly in for a tip dunk) and on defense he was in different (unless he though he could get a block). He wasn’t boxing out or husling on the boards. He forced a few jumpers, which is understandable considering he doesn’t get to play that much and it was garbage time, however I hate seeing him settle for 18 footers when he’s got the talent to make a move or two and get an easier shot.

Argeed, I don’t know the kid. And yes he’s still a kid so we gotta give him some wiggle room, but man this guy really needs to grow up. It’s not like Monta or Biedrins who both came into the league young (18 and 17 respectively) need to mature as much as Randolph clearly does. I’d rather not have him as a problem on the roster if that means we can get move up in the draft and finally solve the PF issue.

A Sonics fan without a team.. Though I'm auditioning GS Warriors this season.

by mcwalter44 on Jan 26, 2009 10:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Read Steinmentz blog, he’s updated that Anthony has been praised by the coaching staff and even Nelson himself in his practice habits.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t rely too much on the media when judging a player. A lot of the time they are very different than how they are portrayed. It is hard to judge most of these players, and rightly so, because we don’t know them. People try to read too much into insignifcant things because that is the only information we have about them. Every journalist that is paid to write about more than facts and stats will bring in their own perspective and bias to their piece.

For instance: Randolph’s body language does not mean as much as we all think it means. Just because he looks pissed does not make him a malcontent. Players around him know him and probably understand him and why he acts the way he does, and that is really all that matters. Oftentimes situations in the locker room are created from the outside.

by belilaugh on Jan 27, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Just because he looks pissed does not make him a malcontent.

when has he ever looked pissed? Everytime he has a camera on him he has his already trademarked sad face on : (

by Dr. Orpheus on Jan 28, 2009 1:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Everytime he has a camera on him he has his already trademarked sad face on : (

 He’s suffering from growing pain

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 28, 2009 9:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Janny Hu's article

61xty has the fan shot of it. In Hu’s article there’s a quote from Randolph’s mom:

Crystal Randolph is the first to admit her son needs to do some growing up. He’s also 19 years old, away from his tight-knit family and learning how to be a professional basketball player.

Even his mom says he was some growing up to do. I’m telling you the guy has issues, which if channeled the right way could make him great player. Look at MJ, he spent his entire career sticking it to all the people that doubted he and said that he couldn’t make it in HS, College, or that he’s just a scorer, etc. Likewise, Randolph is totally a chip on the shoulder type of guy but so far we get mismatch of reports that one week he’s mopping about PT in practice and next week he’s in the gym 3 hours early or skipping Obama coronation to work on his game. I’d like to think he’s busting his but all the time, but then you see him in the games and his natural body language is lethargic.

Like everyone else, I want this guy to be a beast on the boards and game changer on offense, but perhaps that’s just not who he is yet. I really don’t see why we don’t send him to the D-League to work on his game. Perhaps even place a bigger chip on his shoulder too.

A Sonics fan without a team.. Though I'm auditioning GS Warriors this season.

by mcwalter44 on Jan 28, 2009 10:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

people seem to prefer flash over substance.

i’m guessing almost every person that voted for Morrow is more aware of stats.

by the evil monkey on Jan 26, 2009 8:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not only is Morrow a better player at the moment,

but I bet we can get more for trading Marco. What can we get for a big time package of Marco, Crawford, and AR? Toss in a first rounder this year and we could be talking about that big time pf that we always needed….

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

oh I didnt see your comment, I guess I kinda just echoed you. I think Crawford would be the one of the three bad contract vets I would most like to trade but I’d really be fine with a Jack/Marco/Randolph or Maggs/Marco/Wright type of package that netted us a PF too.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jack and Maggs,

are older and have worse contracts then Crawford. Plus I like what Jack and Maggs are bringing to the table at the moment. What I do dread is a defensive backcourt of Craw and Monta would be like.

As much as I would love to see a trade happen to aleviate some of the team’s depth and add a solid pf, the best bet might to wait to the draft and the offseason. Establish who our gm is, get a good feel for Marco, Morrow, CJ, and Buike, and see who gets the first pick. Hopefully we get lucky and can grab Griffin. Most likely we won’t but we could pull of something like this:

If Memphis pops the first pick and Crawford doesnt opt out, maybe we can trade Craw, Randolph, and Marco, and our first pick for Griffen and Marko Jaric or something like that…

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 11:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

not me

I voted for Morrow simply because I like him better. But I like him better because I notice that he makes far fewer mistakes than Marco and gets all his points in the flow of the game, and I think this team needs a “shooter” who can actually shoot. Marco has exceeded my expectations for him this season, but I’d be looking to deal him very soon. I’d love to see CJ, Buike, Morrow, Turiaf and another big as the bench squad next year with one of Jack/Craw/Maggs having been packaged in a deal with one of the young tall skinnies and Marco.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

marco makes more mistakes

because he has the ball in his hands much more often than morrow does. as much as i love to see morrow stroke the ball right now, he is mostly just a catch and shoot player. marco can penatrate and create for others as well as shoot (granted not as well as morrow). i think marco is a better athlete too. contract/money issues aside i think marco is a better player. he will always be a valued asset to our team because he has more dimentions to his game than morrow. but damn it is a beautiful sight to watch morrow shoot.

by jnormous on Jan 27, 2009 2:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

At this point, AR doesn't deserve 10, I agree...

but it’s still obvious to me that the kid’s got mad talent, it’s only a matter of time until he can feel more comfortable on the court.

I pretty much agree with all the minutes you put up there, except I wouldn’t mind seeing Crawford/CJ/Williams/(maybe even Randolph) getting traded for another big man to fill the PF or C rolls and Marco taking JC’s place as PG.

by FishStix on Jan 26, 2009 12:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is it obvious that he’s got ‘mad talent’? He can certainly rebound at the NBA level, but I don’t think that this usually gets described as mad talent. He can block shots.

That “matter of time” could be a lifetime. This is a guy who didn’t shoot well in college, hasn’t shot well in the pros, though part of the ‘talent’ was supposed to be because he was a guy nearly 7 feet tall who had perimeter skills. This skill didn’t seem to correspond with hitting shots from the perimeter. Apparently, his ‘perimeter skills’ also involved having some ability to put the ball on the floor and pass the ball, but again, at the college level, this resulted in many turnovers, not many driving buckets and didn’t seem to accompany many passes that led to buckets. Based on the results of the past, there’s no reason to believe that he has to put it all together or that it’s just a matter of time before it all gels and he becomes a star. It’s entirely possible that he’ll remain what he was in college and has been in the pros: a talented athlete whose talent doesn’t seem to extend to the consistency or court judgment necessary to be able to use that talent to an effective end.

by jae on Jan 26, 2009 12:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mr. jae

I am actually awaiting for your seal of approval on both Morrow and Azubuike.

As far as I can see, they’re both rock solid in all the areas you consider important: high FG%, very solid rebounding numbers (for guards), low turnover rates. Both attended highly respected NCAA programs, one for three years, one for four. Both seem to have great heads on their shoulders, work hard on D, and have a low propensity for whining, showboating, and making boneheaded mistakes. Both are low on the dreaded “potential” and high on the “hey, even if we don’t improve one whit, we’re still basically NBA average for our positions!”

Are you going to take a stand on Marco v. Morrow (v. Craw v. CJ v. Buki), or sit this one out? Do you still think Monta, AB, and possibly Wright are our only players worth a damn?

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 26, 2009 2:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"Dr. Jae", if you must.

I’ve always liked Azubuike. He is not much more than an average contributor (but remember what I mean by average—average play = .500 winning percentage) presently, but he’s cheaper than average and still in the up part of the development curve.

Morrow I like as well but want a slightly longer track record before He rebounds and makes shots. These two simple details are far, far more telling about a team’s success than any subjective measure of athleticism or “skills” or fit. He’s a real nice thing to have in a shooting specialist who doesn’t cost you on the boards ala Kapono. His + – is not surprising accordingly.

There are many a flashy player who are considered ‘better’ (because they score more in most cases) who do less to help their team win because of the negatives they bring (low FG%, high turnovers, inability to rebound) outweigh their ‘skills’ and ‘athleticism’.

I like Marco now as well, but it’s more on a potential basis. I was real, real down on him when he seemed to be the ‘pure shooter’ who couldn’t shoot, but he’s shown some ability to make shots now and has a bit more versatility in his offense and contributions on offense. If he shows playmaking abilities, he could be more valuable than Morrow. If his value is such though, I’d offer him in trades now as I suspect some other fool will think more of him and overbid.

by jae on Jan 26, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

a potential basis?!

POTENTIAL?!

you are citing potential? wonders never cease …

;-)

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2009 8:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marco’s shown me that he’s improving in the areas he had to in order to be effective. Potential with evidence of progress is something I can get behind. Abstract potential in the “yeah, he sucks, and he’s sucked for a while and the things that made him suck in the past are still the things he sucks at and his level of suckitude seems stuck at ‘man, that guy really sucks’ but wow, he’s got potential” doesn’t do quite so much for me. Marco appears to actually be improving.

by jae on Jan 26, 2009 9:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

mr jae again!

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 6:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Haha...

classic.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 10:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

advantage

sleepy

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 11:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

not yet

I think this was only round 2, I want this one to go all 11 rounds, its so entertaining.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 12:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

what did you type in to get that picture haha

by THIZZ-A-LOT on Jan 27, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

just did a google image search for mr. jay

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 2:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Release Marcus Williams

and keep CJ on the bench

Play the rest and win the nba championship

=Gaucho=

by Gaucho! on Jan 26, 2009 5:22 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Crawford should, hopefully, be gone at the end of the season so we can keep them both. Crawford doesn’t offer a whole lot to this team imo. Inconsistent volume shooter with little to no defense. Pairing him with Ellis in the backcourt would give us one of the worst defensive tandems in the league at Guard. Belli and Morrow at least look like they’re improving on defense.

by superk1ng on Jan 26, 2009 6:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Still crowded with

Monta, CJ(Nellie’s favorite), Morrow, Buike, Jackson, Marco, and some mins for Maggette at the 3. All of those guys(maybe not including CJ) want to play 20-25mins+ a game.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 9:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

in reality we probably have 2 more PG/wing players than can fit into the rotation, not just one.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 10:54 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Many decent players, not many who are anything more than ‘decent’ though. Two decent players rarely produce as much as one really good player.

by jae on Jan 26, 2009 10:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Everyone was talking about how terrible the Celtics were gonna be because they lacked depth last year and look where they ended up. I think depth is important but it seems like bench role players arent all that difficult to find……we’ve dug at least one out of the NBADL/undrafted scrap heap every year for the last 3 years at least. I’ll take 3 stars and take my chances trying to find a couple Morrow/Buike/Powe/Tony Allen types over a squad full of decent any day.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+100

That’s why it makes no sense for some of these posters saying we need to trade for the likes of Drew Gooden, Charlie Villanueva, etc, etc. These guys will not make a big enough difference to vault us into contention in the West in the next year. Every NBA player has talent, otherwise they’d be playing on the And1 mixtape tour or something. It’s the superstars that you need to find and cultivate so they can elevate the play of the average NBA player.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well put,

the best teams roll with a 9 man rotation that include an All Star or 2 and solid role players.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 11:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

weaknesses

I like them both, but i think what prompts people to try to decide between the two is not what they each bring to the team, but what they don’t bring.

Morrow is a poor poor ball handler. It may be something that can be improved, but to what extent? For a team that likes to push the ball from any player that snags a rebound, it’s big negative for him. Morrow’s game would explode on a half-court oriented team imo.

Bellineli can get careless and turnover prone. It may just be a matter of catching up to NBA speeds and using his noodle better out there, but for now it’s his biggest problem. The good news is that it’s not because he has poor handles or poor court vision… definitely the opposite. But he gets careless and often tries risky plays that don’t pay off.

I’d hate to bench or release either player. For now, Morrow has the visibility because Belli is injured. And then there’s that 50% 3pt shooting clip (Jesus!). But i also have to admit that having Marco on the floor is pretty fun. I do miss watching him play.

As for Randolph… he makes Pietrus look like he has a genius level basketball IQ.

I pray i never have to use a gun again...

...unless i'm at a strip club parking lot...

...and somebody tries to run me over with their car...

...But how often does that happen??

by ssmokinjoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:05 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

too soon to tell

we need to find out if Morrow is going to be able to really handle the ball and play defense at the NBA level before a decision is made.

Williams is obviously a waste of Oxygen, but I am not ready to pick between Marco, Morrow, or Crawford right now. Marco plays well on defense, but his offesnse is streaky, and Crawford is a great leader on the bench, but his in game decision-making is not as good as I was hoping for.

I think CJ Watson is becoming a solid backup point guard for this league. I would hate to see him go during the next 3 or 4 years.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.

by warriorsvictim on Jan 26, 2009 10:07 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

rec'd

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 7:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

CJ Watson is becoming a solid backup point guard for this league

    If CJ wants to stay as benched back up that’s ok. We really need to move either Montay or Crawford as they are too similiar then we can keep both M&M’s . Marco might be the best point guard we have right now which explains our dismal record. Morrow can do a lot more than he gets credit for, he’s an excellent rebounder.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 26, 2009 10:24 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I’d say CJ is more of an undersized SG.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

too soon

Marcus won’t be back for sure, and crawford may opt out and go somewhere else.

This season, once marco comes back, jc/marco at the point (with some monta I guess) means less time for CJ. But CJ never seems to mind not playing much, and with our injury record, should hang on to him for this season and see what happens after the season is over.

I see no reason to get rid of morrow – he seems like a capable backup to sjax, especially if his D improves.

I am more concerned about bw/ar development.

by mosdl on Jan 26, 2009 10:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Morrow’s a good bit better than Marco, and Morrow complements the rest of our roster better than Marco, as well. I’d also probably take CJ over Marco. Marco’s played a little better defensively than CJ, but CJ scores a bit better, rebounds better, and for all the angst about his struggles on the break, his passing numbers are better than Marco’s.

I enjoy Marco, but I think he’d be a good guy to move while he still might intrigue somebody. He’d be a perfect guy to toss into a Crawford package this summer.

by onlxn on Jan 26, 2009 10:47 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

he’d be the perfect guy to toss into a Crawford or Maggette package this year and send up to Canada to play with his buddy Bargnani. We just have to find a third team who would like JO and has something to give us in return too

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 10:50 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Or we can make it simple and grab JO,

for a Maggette, Crawford, Marco, and either Wright or Randolph, if Toronto is also willing to give up thier first rounder. I have been kicking that idea around my head for a bit, and not sure if I would do it(both sides) but its atleast something to think about…

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 11:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I’d do as either side. The Raptors go from having NO scoring threats on the wing to having good depth there, and two true scorers to compliment Bossh. Belinelli can ease Calderon of his heavy work load at PG a bit. Their D gets worse, but they like to run an uptempo system anyway. It makes them non-players in 2010, but they really only had a shot at bringing Bosh back and possibly overpaying a 2nd or 3rd tier guy anyway. The dubs give up lots of backcourt/wing depth but I’m fine with Monta, Jack and Buike starting with CJ and Morrow getting heavy minutes off the bench. I guess JO and Biedrins probably start together which isnt an ideal combination, but JO would be a very tradeable asset for the next year or give us a shot at a non-LeBron/Wade/Bosh FA in 2010. I’d do it.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 7:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Definetly,

I wouldnt mind seeing JO and AB up front as a stop gap mesure. It would give us great salary cap relief and let us hone in on either AR or BW to develop. JO would be a great piece to move in the offseason. Addition by subtracion. Barring any injuries, Nellie would have to play Buike and Morrow more till the off season.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 7:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

steinmetz please. stop being so wrong.

how are morrow and belli similar?? they are no where NEAR the same player!!

jamal opts out, we dont resign williams. then we have four players in the backcourt, which isn’t that crowded considering morrow mostly plays the 3. not the 2…

by HoLdEmUP on Jan 26, 2009 11:48 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I got to disagree,

I think MS is dead on. K, lets assume JC opts out and we are obviously not bringing back Williams, but since Nellie will be back, it is fair to assume that CJ will be back.

So at the 1,2, and 3 we would have Ellis, Watson, Jackson, Azibuike, Morrow, and Bellinelli to squeeze minutes for the next season. Show me how you would make those minutes work, at the 3 spots we got for them. And I would at the very least slate Maggette down for 15 minutes at the 3.( I am assuming that you want AR and BW to atleast play some at the 4, next season)
This is what I got for next year(again assuming JC is gone and we bring back Watson)

PG: Monta 35, CJ 13
SG: Azibuike 25, Jackson 10, Morrow 13
SF: Jackson 25, Maggette 18, Morrow 5

Morrow and Marco do have different games, but for our purposes they are filling the same spot on the depth chart. Marco intiates the plays better and might be a slightly better defender, but Morrow is a much better shooter and a better rebounder. I voted for AM, and was stunned at how many people voted for Marco.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This assumes we resign CJ….Are you so sure….

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldnt bet the farm on it,

but the assumption is based on loosing Crawford and we dont make any significant changes to our backcourt. Unless your right about CJ getting a MLE I think Nellie brings him back.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 10:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I see what Steinmetz is saying...

They’re both similar as far as impact on the game at this point in time. You insert both to stretch the floor with their shooting.

Morrow has the advantage in shooting ability but loses out on play making and defense.
Belinelli has the advantage in play making and defense but loses out shooting ability.

If I had to pick between the two, I’d personally like Belinelli as a plyer because his game is more well rounded. However, 50% 3 point shooters are just as hard to find.

Can’t go wrong with either player IMO, so if I were a GM I’d keep the one that nets us less in a trade.
 

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Just wondering,

what exactly about Marco’s game do you really like. I do like the way he intiates the offense. We seem to stagnate a bit without Monta or JC on the floor. His defense is good for our team(kind of a back handed compliment) but Morrow is a better rebounder and learning alot on the fly. With him on the wing with Monta to take it to the rack or drive and kick gives us a great combo. I like Marco as our backup pg and possibly 5-10 minutes a game with Ellis, but I like Morrow a whole lot more. It might not be a given that he breaks 50% from the arc the rest of his career but its a safe bet, that if he gets the chance he will be in the top 5 3point shooters for a long time.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 12:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Playmaking ability > Rebounding

Morrow is a one dimensional player. He’s a shooter who can rebound a little. If he works hard he can be a Micheal Redd type player but more than likely he’ll be a 3 point specialist.

Marco’s strength as a play maker is a HUGE plus and he’s not a bad shooter in his own right. Court vision and play making ability is a trait that you are born with as a basketball player, IMO and is much harder to work on than a jump shot. Because of that Marco has more potential IMO as a Manu-type player.

The bottom line is that the things that Morrow has over Marco can be worked on and improved: shooting consistency and rebounding. The thing that Marco has over Morrow: play making and court vision are much harder to improve as I feel they are natural abilities.
 
As for where Marco fits in with Ellis, he could fit the same role as Morrow as he is a solid shooter and than some as Marco and Ellis can take turns driving and kicking. You can never have enough play makers on the court when you lack a true dominant PG like Baron Davis.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It should be noted that Marco’s passing numbers are nothing special so far. He averages 1.48 assists per turnover. That ain’t bad, but it’s nowhere near the level of a point guard. Jack, whose passing has made many of us tear our hair out this year, has a better ratio than that. Monta was well above that last year, and most people here don’t think he can run an offense.

You know who else ranks above Marco in that category? Anthony Morrow. He racks up assists only half as often as Marco, but turns it over only a third as often as Marco. Morrow averages 1.89 assists per turnover. That’s really, really good.

I’m not contending that Morrow’s a better passer than Marco. I think Marco’s the better passer. I think Marco’s a good passer, and I think this stat understates his ability… he certainly contributes more to offensive flow than Crawford, whose numbers are superficially better.

But Marco makes a lot of mistakes. That’s a real problem, and it hurts his value as a passer. Morrow almost never makes mistakes, which is part of the reason that he’s been the better player so far.

by onlxn on Jan 26, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to compare thehaha

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 11:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to compare them....

Marco is asked to initiate offense, where as all Morrow is asked to do is catch and shoot.

Marco’s looks like he’ll develop nicely from what I’ve seen.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 11:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

marco is a great shooter just not morrow esque

its like having an a plus shooter in morrow and an a minus b plus shooter in marco while hes a b plus in everything else.

by montadaboss on Jan 27, 2009 9:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

agree

Ya I think we should just hold off on trade talks (unless amare is involved) and play the rest of this year out. Jamal will most likely opt out this summer I don’t think he is part of our long term plans he was just the best player we could get for AL at the time. I like Jamal … but not close as much as Monta. Besides Monta and Morrow look like they compliment each other really well. Quick take it to the rack mid-range Monta and then the dead eye shooting of Morrow. And just by watching him you can tell he is working on his defense, same with Marco.

by FeartheBeard4 on Jan 26, 2009 12:07 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

To be honest, I would choose none of the above options

I like the play of both Morrow and Beli. Its true that we have too many guys filling out nearly the same roll. That’s why I’d say, if we’re going to keep our current roster OTHER than these two, I’d probably take Morrow. However, my ideal lineup would include trading our two worst defenders, CJ and Crawfish, move Beli into the PG position, and keep Morrow as our go-to man for 3’s.

The reason I would choose Morrow of Beli if the rest of the roster stayed the same is because while Beli has tons of promise, this is Morrow’s 1st year and we’re already seeing him produce more than Beli was. Beli is a great passer and playmaker at times, and can hit jumper / drive well at times. Morrow can hit the 3, and that’s about it. But at the same time I see more promise in Morrow simply because I know his game will expand to encompass driving, playmaking, and defense like Beli’s has over the last year.

Ultimately, like I said above, I’d like to see them both stay with CJ and JC getting traded for another solid PF or C, and pickup a good PG in the draft next year.

by FishStix on Jan 26, 2009 12:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I like it,

Moving Watson and CJ(possibly with a Wright or Randolph throw in to sweeten the pot to get a good pf) would be a great move and we can use Marco exclusively as the back up pg and spot him 5 to 10 minutes with Monta depending on how the game is flowing.

Only problem with that is I dont know what type of restricted/bird rights a team would have with CJ if we trade him. I am faily sure we have some type of early restricted free agency or early bird rights on CJ at the end of the year, not sure if he loses those if he gets traded, maybe jae or someone could help me out. Another thing about CJ is he comes dirt cheap at 440,000 or something…

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 12:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if Morrow's game will expand...

He hasn’t been asked to fill those roles and in college never averaged more than 1 assist per game so to expect him to become a better play maker is a GIANT leap. He may catch up with Belinelli in driving and defense, but I would count the odds as slim to none that we Morrow ever becomes a play maker that Marco is.

You have to remember Marco was touted as having PG skills so what he’s doing now is not a sudden expansion of his game from rookie to sophomore, but rather the result of playing time and confidence. Again, that’s why I would choose Marco over Morrow… I’d like to have as many play makers as possible and the gap between Marco and Morrow in play making is unlikely to be closed, while Marco can eventually develop into a 45% 3 point shooter.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 12:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But...

with Monta on the floor and hopefully with som pg skills next year we wont need to rely on Marco to intiate the offense on the team. So the question comes down to, who fits better with Ellis and Jack on the floor. And thats AM by a landslide….

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marco fits in perfectly as to share the play making load...

I don’t think Ellis can ever develop into a 10 assist/game player. He’ll settle in nicely around 6-5 assists a game.

With Ellis, Marco, and SJax you will have 3 play makers who can each average 6 assist a game and share the duties of initiating offense.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 4:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

It will come down to who the coaching staff thinks fits better with Monta. I’d give the edge to Marco right now. His offensive game is more balanced than Morrow’s (Although it’s coming around nicely too ; )….)

I still think both can fit on the team. I like the idea of having both Morrow and Marco on the court with Ellis. He’ll have so many drive and kick options it’s not even funny.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying that Morrow would become PG....

simply that his defense, rebounding, and driving ability will continue to expand. If we were to keep JC, it’d be fine to see Marco leave because we’d still have the PG. If not, we could get lucky and land a great PG in the draft, or in a trade consisting of CJ / AR / MWill / SJax(maybe). Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if Monta steps up to the PG roll quite nicely.

So, my point is, while I doubt Morrow will ever be the playmaker Beli could be, I don’t think it would matter, as we can get / do have good PGs already.

by FishStix on Jan 26, 2009 12:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Easier said than done....

We had Tim Hardaway in the 90s and BD for a brief stint in the 2000s.

PGs just don’t grow on trees…

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nellie's a loser

and those teams never made it past the first round of the playoffs, and only made it to the playoffs half of the time. why? solely due to the idiocy that is nellie-ball.

by nelliehater on Jan 27, 2009 4:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ummm…we DID make it past the first round of the playoffs 2 years ago. Did you miss that? It was only the first or second biggest bay area sports story of the decade.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't Worry

This really isnt that big an issue. We should just wait and see how they are when marco is healthy. Until then discussing this is pointless. Also both Marco and Morrow are young and have a lot of potential to get a lot better. Now do you really want to see them doing what they do for other teams on a nightly basis? This is what good championship winning teams do. They get a 12-man deep roster and find enough minutes in it for everyone to be happy and productive. I believe that we are a championship contender in about 2 to 3 years assuming Jamal Crawford does not opt out and Jackson and Maggette have some game left in them by then. With all the experience that Wright, Randolph, Belinelli, Morrow, Biedrins, and yes even Ellis are going to have by that time, I think that a championship will not be unrealistic. I’d like to see another team throw out a 12 man roatation that actually works.

I Believe In Monta Ellis.

by WarriorFanLive on Jan 26, 2009 12:55 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I would have to go with Marco....

Belinelli has play making skills and he has really worked hard on defense. If I had to choose then I would choose Marco, but there is no problem with keeping both. Morrow is the best shooter on the team, but Marco is not far behind. It would be interesting to see Marco at the 1 and Morrow at the 2 for a little bit. Personally I think CJ as well as he has been playing is the odd man out.

by t3-glaze on Jan 26, 2009 1:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting question...

I have to agree with all the guys I usually agree with on this one. Morrow is the better player.

I do have to give Marco some credit. He really surprised me this year. I think he has proven that he can play in this league, which is more than I could say for him last season. I don’t think he will be anything special but he is one of those players that can do a lot of things on the court (pass, shoot, finish, handle the ball), he just can’t do any of them exceptionally. There always seems to be a GM out there that’s intigued by these type of players so there may be hope yet to get some value back for him.

Morrow on the other hand has a limited skill-set (shooting, rebounding) but seems to completely understand the limitations of his game and plays his role well. He has one skill which he is exceptional at (shooting) and he puts forth a good effort in the other areas of the game (defense, etc.).

I think the ideal situation which has already been presented above would be to make a deal involving Crawford, Marco, and Wright/Randolph (possibly our pick) for a starting PF or expiring contracts and a lotto pick (more ping pong balls in our favor). This is way easier said than done but it would solve so many of the problems with our roster. We would need to find someone with particular interest in either Wright or Randolph to really get the deal done but a deal may be out there to be had.

I’d love to see a line-up like this heading into next season:

PG: Monta / CJ
SG: Jackson / Morrow
SF: Maggs / Buike
PF: (Player to be named later =P) / Wright or Randolph (whoever we don’t trade)
C: Andris / Turiaf

Everyone would be back in there proper position with little need to go small. Pipe dream? Probably, but I’m a Warriors fan so it comes naturally. Any ideas who we could target via trade?

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 1:35 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Possible targets:

In no particular order, some realistic and some not so much…

Elton Brand (buyers remorse?)
Rasheed Wallace
Jamison
J. O’neal
Amare Stoudemire
Gerald Wallace
Boris Diaw
Carlos Boozer

After looking around a bit there isn’t really a perfect fit. We might be better off trying to identify a lottery team that sees themselves as a step away from contention. The Wizards come to mind. They have been devastated by injuries and will likely have a very high pick, but you would think they wouldn’t be thinking in terms of rebuilding or waiting for guys to develop. They might be willing to trade their pick under the right circumstances if we can deliver a piece or two that would fit in once they get healthy for next year.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 2:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d take a look at Brand, Boozer and obviously Stoudemire. Do we have the pieces to get those players? Maybe Brand. Boozer could be a stretch. I can’t see Stoudemire.

by jmaaan on Jan 26, 2009 3:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Brand – No, I’m not sure, but he might have a limited no trade clause. Plus i doubt Philly would be so willing to get rid of him so fast (unlike Toronto).

Boozer – Not going to happen. Miami seems like a much better fit (They have the money).

Stoudamire – Least likely of all. Teams rarely ever trade within the division, not to mention with a top All-NBA caliber player.

All 3 fit our need, but I think they’re all too much of a stretch to play in Oakland.

We need a classic big-man with range on his jumpshot, can play the high-post, rebound, and defend other PF’s. There isn’t many options in the NBA via Free agency (due to monetary restraints) or trade (due to availability + team assest).

I’d say the draft is our one good shot. Although a crap shoot, We have to roll the dice and hope Nelson finds a player he can play. So my suggestion:

Whatever team gets the third overall pick, I’d trade our lottery (6-9 whatever we end up with) and Anthony Randolph (I prefer Brandan Anyway) and nab Greg Monroe. He’s gotten many comparisons to a younger less athletic Chris Webber. And we all know who Mullin brought in mid-way through the season last year. His main negative is that he isn’t a prolific rebounder. I’d say that if he can consistently box out his assignment and not get pushed around underneath the basket, It’ll allow Biedrins free to gobble up rebounds in/around his zone.

So lets hear it, any other ideas?

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What?

You say the draft is our best option? Nooooooo really??? < /sarcasm > =P

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 10:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

haha

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 27, 2009 2:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We need a classic big-man with range on his jumpshot, can play the high-post, rebound, and defend other PF’s.

Sounds like Rasheed, let’s just clone him.

Or how about a “poor man’s Rasheed” instead?

let’s see, a big man with range, defends other teams’ bigs, can run the court and score in an uptempo style …

Q: wonder what we would do with a player like that?

A: Trade him to NY.

Let us not forget why we are in this mess.

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2009 12:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We need a classic big-man with range on his jumpshot, can play the high-post, rebound, and defend other PF’s.

that doesnt really sound like Al Harrington at all

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 12:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We are not in this mess because we sent away a tweener forward who did not rebound well enough nor have a post game sufficient to play PF.

This mess is largely because we got nothing to replace Baron and Monta’s been gone for half the year. It really is that simple.

by jae on Jan 27, 2009 6:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Addendum:

Managment’s ‘solutions’ to the team’s problems haven’t helped, and have in fact hindered future moves to help.

Still, the immediate on court issues are simply that 2 dozen wins haven’t been in Warrior uniforms this year.

by jae on Jan 27, 2009 6:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nellie's a loser

and this mess has little to do with either. it always amazes me when the ignorants cry about injuries, yet SUCCESSFUL coaches like popovich and sloan come up with winning teams year after year and have far more significant injuries. hell, sloan could play the entire year without boozer AND ak47, and still have a better record than nellie coaching a full squad. it is the idiocy of nellie-ball that has caught up with the mirage of success.

by nelliehater on Jan 27, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nellie's a loser

and HE is management as much as any fo puke making half his salary. only the owner can contradict nellie, and we all know how much THAT happens—c webb, anyone?

by nelliehater on Jan 27, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ummm……Pops has had Tim Duncan all year. Plus either Tony Parker or Manu Ginobili or both most of the year.

Sloan has had Deron Williams or Carlos Boozer all year. Plus AK47, Milsap, and Okur most of the year.

We’ve had Andris Biedrins all year.

One of those 3 doesnt belong, you figure it out.

……oh, why do I even bother youre just a coach blaming nut. I’m sure the Giants’ woes are ALL Bochy’s fault too, right? I mean with Lincecum and Cain it shouldnt matter that he doesnt have any big league hitters. Terry Francona doesnt complain when Mike Lowell gets injured and he the Red Sox still had a better record than the Giants.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 6:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nellie's a loser

and i blame HIM, not bochy for the giant’s woes.

by nelliehater on Jan 29, 2009 12:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It really is that simple

if anyone’s oversimplifying it’s me – cause it’s been a perfect storm that has enveloped us

Maggs and Monta were supposed to pick up the slack Baron left, Harrington and an improving Wright were supposed to offer just enough at the PF, and of course none of that happened and everyone’s well aware of the injuries to just about every guard on the team at one point or another.

Harrington’s trade sticks in the craw more than the rest for a couple reasons – first, because it was the position we could least afford to weaken and knowing that Nelson should have managed it better — and at least had the savvy to know when to pull the trigger even if he couldn’t get a Fwd in return.

Second – Nelson, not Harrington, made the conflict public and Nelson – again not Harrington, made the decision Al wouldn’t play due to the phantom injury all the while scapegoating Harrington. Once Nelson went down that path, there was no resurrecting the situation. Conversely, Nelson could have (should have imo) lessened rather than heightened the pressure building between Al and himself to maximize what he could until the opportunity to replace Harrington manifested itself for the good of the team and the franchise’s future.

Finally – Crawford is not only a duplicate talent on this roster, his contract is an albatross around the franchise’s neck. So we’re likely still going to be paying for this decision long after Nelson’s gone when we cannot move Crawford for anyone better than Harrington’s value to our franchise (which includes the value of his expiring contract).

Now I know you know all this. But while so many here want to play the blame game and crucify Nelson for every bad thing that’s happened including Global Warming, most are way off base. Even if Nelson had a hand in low-balling Baron (and I’m not sure he did or didn’t) he can’t be blamed for Monta’s injury, nor any of the other injuries, can’t be blamed for taking the shot at signing Maggette while the brief window of opportunity existed and Maggette was the best FA available at the time, and Rowell took all the credit for the the ridiculous Jackson extension. So most of the perfect storm seems to have been out of his control. The Harrington decision was his and his alone.

So, while Harrington didn’t meet our fantasy of Howard in a GSW uniform, he was and remains the best PF option we’ve had. Even if he wasn’t rebounding as well as we’d like, he drew opposing rebounders away from the hoop and defended other bigs – both qualities Maggette lacks (opposing PFs backed off him early this year daring Maggs to fire away from long range, exposing his deficiency there and we regularly lose the battle inside on defense using small ball). How many of those close games might Harrington have made a 1-2-3 point difference either from the arc, drawing a rebounder away, or simply playing slightly better interior defense? We’ll never know, but wish we’d had a chance to find out. Instead we play KAz at PF, and on GSoM we spend time wondering if we can obtain an over-the-prime Rasheed who we will likely have to over-pay, if there’s any chance at all. While maybe, with Harrington, we might not have been so far out of the playoff picture now …

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

great post, at first I liked Jamal, now he is the bane of this team’s existence.

by FishStix on Jan 29, 2009 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right on OM,

I totally agree with you, in fact I propsed trading those exact players a few posts up. After thinking about a little more, If we can really get an Amare type player, I would be willing to even toss in a Azibuike AND a first rounder. Not sure if Phoenix wants to give up Amare and espicially not to a division rival, but a package of Crawford, Randolph, Bellinelli, and Azibuike + a first rounder might be too much for the to say no to.

As for JOneal, I have thought about getting him in a salary dump involving Randolph, Maggette, Crawford, and possibly Marco if they were willing to toss in a first rounder.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 6:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Who else besides Amare is an “Amare type player”?

P.S. You don’t need to answer that question.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d add Odom to that list

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 7:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with

Boozer, Wallace, and Odom are they are expiring. I want to atleast get a player we will have for next season.

Too bad our front office is such a debacle, otherwise we might be good someday...

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good point...

I noticed that when I was putting that list together. There are a lot of players that “fit the bill” that have expiring contracts. I don’t mind trading Crawford or Marco for an expiring but I’d think twice before trading Wright for a “rental”.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 8:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The thing is if we ‘suck’ enough then Crawford will leave on his own at the end of the year.(or we can atleast hope) Despite his good play lately, I would still give Wright or Randolph AND Marco for a team to take Maggette if they would give us an expiring in return.

With Nellie as our coach the next 2 years, I just dont see room enough for Wright and Randolph. I prefer Wright to stay, but I am ok with AR too.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 8:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Its been mentioned here before but we might look after a sign and trade for Boozer in the offseason,

If Utah feels good with Millsap and are tired of Booz’s theatrics. We can offer a package of Maggette and take your pick of Wright/Randolph and another take your pick of Buike/Marco, toss in this year’s first rounder and maybe next year’s as well and Utah might have to think about it. Unfortunetly it wouldnt probably happen seeing as Booz would have to agree to the sign and trade…

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 8:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunetly it wouldnt probably happen seeing as Booz would have to agree to the sign and trade…

Nailed it…

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 9:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So... what about now?

The Jazz might as well write off their hopes of a championship, or even going deep into the playoffs, right now. AK-47’s been sitting out with a bum ankle that may need surgery, DWill was hurt for the first third of the season and has had a slow start, Boozer’s been out forever and will likely need a few weeks just to get back into shape, Millsap is hurting, etc. They can’t beat good teams at home, and they can’t beat anyone on the road. Given that Boozer has all but vowed to opt-out, wouldn’t it make some sense for them shop him and start the rebuilding process now, around Deron, Millsap, and some other young pieces?

Hmmm… we’ve got a few young pieces to offer … Say, Belinelli, Wright, Crawford, and a protected #1?

On our end, I don’t what kind of guarantee we could get that Boozer would stick around, but if he did, he could be part of a young, very talented, tough, balanced starting 5…

Monta
Jackson
Maggette
Boozer
Biedrins
——
Buki, Morrow, CJ, Turiaf, Randolph

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 26, 2009 9:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Same problem...

There is no guarantee that he would re-sign with us. Although if Utah was willing to deal I might do it anyway. He is one of those guys that would be worth it. Would I do the same thing with Rasheed Wallace or Odom (who are in the same situation)? Probably not but I’d really like half a season to try to convince Boozer that this would be a great place to play for years to come. I am so down with that line-up you just posted. We would also have a financial advantage resigning him if we could get him now. I’m not sure who is going to have serious money to throw at Boozer in the off-season.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 9:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You know who will have serious money?

The Cavs. Both Snow and Wally coming off the books, like $21M total.

Not sure if they could convince Boozer to return to that hellhole of a city, but imagine a frontline of LeBron/Boozer/Ilgauskas/Wallace…? With a credible PG in Mo Williams? Scary.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 26, 2009 9:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

First of all that would never happen, because of how he left the Cavs.

The Cavs are so far over the cap that Snow and Wally might not even get them under the luxary tax, let alone get far enough under the cap to hand a near max deal.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 10:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They’ll be under cap by 2010.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

To echo your points...

Boozer’s still only 27, not 28 till next November. Right in his prime, with not the slightest sign of statistical decline. Straight up, I’d actually probably rather have him than Amare. And I can see realistic reasons for the Jazz to deal him, whereas Phoenix should really be thinking of Amare as their cornerstone. I wonder if we’ve at least paid Utah a courtesy call…

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 26, 2009 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would have Amare,

espicially with Nellie as your head coach. I dont know if I really want to give up Wright and Marco and a first just for a half year with an injured Boozer. Not that I think Wright/Randolph or Marco are going to light it up, but I think we can get more than that. I am really hanging on to this ridiculuos hope that Crawford will be tired of being on a loosing team his entire career and want to opt and take a 5 year MLE on a playoff team.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 26, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't do this...

last time you sounded like this you convinced me we would get KG… : (

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 10:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d consider that deal too. But at this point, we’re so far out of playoff contention that it doesn’t really seem worth it if its not 100% guaranteed that we can resign Booz after this year.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 26, 2009 10:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

we had a better chance of getting KG than of getting Boozer imo

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2009 12:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but

getting Boozer, Wallace, or Odom via trade would give us a good shot to sign one of them this summer. It may not be the same one we traded for, but I’d be happy with any of those three. Even if we somehow werent able to sign any of them we’d have 10-15 mil of cap room which certainly isnt the worst thing in the world as long as we dont turn around and spend it on another wing player. I’d be fine with dealing Wright for a “rental” that would alllow us to re-sign that rental or another of the potential rentals.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 10:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly...

I haven’t looked at our salary situation in a while but I don’t think we would actually have 10-15 mil in actual cap space. I’m not sure how much money we would have to spend on the FA market if that scenario happened. I’ll try to look it up later. JAE any help here?

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 10:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

here ya go

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/golden_state.htm

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Jan 27, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW...

I do agree about having a decent shot at re-signing whoever we got via trade.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 10:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok...

I think, depending on the specifics of the deal, it could put us anywhere from 5-8 mil under the cap if we bag one of these guys and then they walk. I’m too tired to do math but we could actually end up with some space to use.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 26, 2009 11:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

well we’d have a really good shot at re-signing whoever we got, or sign Sheed. I dont think Sheed will command any more than 5-8 next year.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 11:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

sheed be slowing down man, he’s not the same guy that propelled them to finals glory a few years back … he gonna be breaking down sooner than later

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2009 12:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

sure he may be slowing down but he’s still a better alternative at the 4 than anything we’re gonna have for the next couple year unless we get lucky in the lottery and land Griffin.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 12:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

an expensive sheed on the decline or inexpensive wright on the rise? guess it all comes down to $ and we are pretty strapped until and unless we unload an overpaid under-performing vet (or two)

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2009 2:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

honestly I think I’ll take Sheed on the decline over Wright “on the rise” even at double or triple the money. Wright keeps showing incredible flashes, but I’m pretty down on him right now. Of course, that will all change when he comes back and has one or two big games.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 2:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the lineup you present is better than what we’ve had. But I would personally make a couple changes.

1) CJ in the DL was considered a combo guard, he’s handled the ball well, but the more we see of him the more he looks like a good shooter for a 1, but not a great distributor. I suggest if we are going to start Monta at the 1, that we get a good ball handler and distributor to back him up.

2) I like Maggette off the bench. Given this roster, I’d put Buike in the starting lineup.

Suggestions, how about Elton Brand in Philly? I know, they just signed him to a huge contract. However he isn’t fitting in well. They are playing much better without him, using Young at the starting 4. But they need a 2 guard. And maybe they’d look at another young big to compliment Young, Speights, Dalembert.

by jmaaan on Jan 26, 2009 3:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

For PF, I think Odom

would make a great fit. Fast, athletic, can handle the ball, can score, can play D.

by FishStix on Jan 26, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"is better at distributing to other players."

Well if you ignore fancy passes, he has a worse asst-to ratio than Capt Jack. In fact, he’s 8th on the team in terms of assist: to ratio (though 6th if you don’t count Monta or Marcus Williams.

This season he gets an assist on 15.5% of his possessions. Jason Richardson’s career assist% is 15.6… Crawford is the only player on our team that has a career average over 20 percent at 22.8. for comparison, Baron Davis’s career avg is 35.5.

The only guys who actually play who even have 2:1 ratio are Turiaf, Crawford and JC. Baron was almost 3 to 1. last season the W’s were 7th in the NBA at 1.69 to 1. This season the Warriors are 21st at 1.37 to 1.

Fans think he’s a good distributor b/c fancy passes are more memorable than regular John Stockton bounce passes, but in reality he’s not.

(all stats can be found under the advanced section on basketball-reference.com)

by the evil monkey on Jan 26, 2009 9:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Still more passes than Morrow makes...

However, we haven’t seen the best of Marco yet but at least we can see the court vision and passing ability. In time he’ll learn to make the fundamental pass.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 26, 2009 11:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah though his asst:to ratio is actually worse than Morrow's.

weird, must of accidentally deleted the beginning where i compare the “he has more game” to Morrow being a better off/def rebounder (not close), ft, 3pt, midrange shooter, better finisher, blocks more shots, turns ball over less, pump faking. and the only thing Marco does better is pass and flop. they’re about even in terms of ball-handling, defensive and knowing the offense/defense.

anyway, Vujacic was once considered a potential PG to play alongside Kobe. And Vujacic’s passing indicators like asst:to ratio and asst% were actually higher than Marco if you compare their first few years… in other words, players are who they are and you don’t see guys like this become PGs.

even Chauncey started his 1st two years at 22.6% and 26.7% before trekking up to the 30%‘s once he joined the Pistons. Marco’s actual #’s show he would probably be worse than Jack if he was the main distributor.

by the evil monkey on Jan 27, 2009 3:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Do people really think Marco’s going to be a better defender than Morrow going forward? I sure don’t.

Marco’s defense, like the rest of his game, has been a pleasant surprise this year. He’s held his own, and he’s certainly done better than Crawford, CJ and Maggette.

But when I watch Marco on defense, I think of a pitcher who throws 88 MPH with a funky delivery. Guys like that can succeed until they’re figured out, and then they’re sort of done. Marco seems like a smart player, and he’s got some clever flops and other tricks that have served him well so far… but he only throws 88 MPH. The dude has NO foot speed. Once teams realize that, they’re gonna start beating up on him. I mean, this is a guy who’s played 64 NBA games and blocked zero shots. There’s an issue there.

I think Morrow is the superior defender. He pulls down defensive boards almost twice as often, a far bigger gap then positional issues would cause. He gets steals just about as often, but he has at least blocked a couple shots in the NBA. And Morrow almost never turns it over, giving the other team fast breaks. Marco makes a lot of errors in the backcourt that lead to dunks and layups. Morrow’s adjusted plus-minus numbers are still stellar… Marco’s are now mediocre. Part of that is Morrow’s superior offense, but I think defense plays a part, as well.

I’m not hating on Marco… I appreciate his defensive effort this year. But better-than-expected defense does not necessarily mean good defense… better-than-Crawford defense does not necessarily mean good defense. Marco’s defense has been okayish. Morrow’s has been a bit better.

by onlxn on Jan 27, 2009 12:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marco seems like a smart player, and he’s got some clever flops and other tricks that have served him well so far… but he only throws 88 MPH.

  That’s what I’ve been trying to tell people, Marco has to play on the ragged edge to be adequate , that leaves no margin for error. Morrow in contrast plays a very conservative game with lots left in reserve for those times when he needs to step it up a bit so he’ll be better for the long haul.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 27, 2009 10:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I agree but I’m not quite sure I totally understand what youre saying.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 2:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I agree but I’m not quite sure I totally understand what youre saying.

be careful what you wish for, you can’t go back once you understand what I’m sayin.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 27, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

greg maddux did pretty well with an 88mph fastball

and nobody figured him out.

"We're Menudo," -BB

by eshock on Jan 27, 2009 10:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hey, don’t short Maddux, his fastball went from 88 to 92 mph.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1208/is_32_228/ai_n6148350

though hitters figured him out once he turned 37…
http://www.baseball-reference.com/m/maddugr01.shtml

by the evil monkey on Jan 27, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Belli is more solid all around, but man is morrow having a helluva ROOKIE year.

And morrow is learning. Who knows what he could looke like in a couple seasons. I would like to keep em both, but i think we could deffinitly get better value back by trading Marco if its one or the other. But we have too many shooting gaurds beacause thats the way Nelson wants it.

by THIZZ-A-LOT on Jan 26, 2009 1:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

All i know is, we need more fastbreak points and better running...

…and it looks like Marco’s better with that than CJ.

Bye CJ…grab Kurz & M.Will on your way out.

by DubCurse on Jan 26, 2009 3:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is tough

Much tougher than BW/AR. I’d choose BW all day.

Between Marco and Morrow, I’d have to go with Marco. I think he can do more as a player and for the team. He has shown that he can run the team with some effectiveness. He’s a good shooter. No where near as deadly as Morrow but Marco can get hot from out there. He can also create his own shot.

His handles are better than Monta but not as good as Craw. He’s probably one of the better passers on the team. He needs to kick back on the no-looks sometimes, but the dude can dish.

Morrow is sick for an undrafted rookie. His shooting stroke is sweet. He hustles on the glass. He’s trying on the defensive end but I don’t think he is as aggressive as Marco. I’d like to see him getting in the passing lanes and pressuring whoever he’s guarding.

Ideally, I’d like to keep both. That’s where my vote went.

by disguy on Jan 26, 2009 3:48 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

i would keep both

you never know know far either of them will develope so it’ a hard choice. I’m happy we have both but i think that i would take marco because he gives you more. When morrow shot isn’t falling other than rebounding he is going to disappear, while marco can run the offense and a couple of other things. I think that we should keep both and see how they develop over the next 2-3 years

by GSW9 on Jan 26, 2009 5:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with marcos play-making skills and running the offense and that if he develops into more of a play maker, ellis doesn’t have to change his game as much….I think the future starting line up may be

PG – Monta
SG – Bell
SF – Morrow
PF – Wright
C – Beans

You got Bell to hit a cutting monta or can kick out to morrow….beans and wright inside. The way AR is playing right now, I think he could be a first or second option off the bench along with buike CJ and Turiaf.

by goldenboy216 on Jan 26, 2009 6:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

they wont develop if they cant get playing time.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 26, 2009 7:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong Question

Marco vs Morrow is the wrong question. they’re not competing for each others minutes. Marco is vying for minutes vs. Monta and Jamal.

I think the W’s are going to trade either Monta or Jamal + extras in a blockbuster at end of season.

by joegiant on Jan 26, 2009 7:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

What do the warriors and a genetically modified KFC chicken have in common?


They both got like 8 wings!

…and no head.

Until monta learns to be one that is.
I say keep em all and keep rotating them to keep them fresh and running and gunning. Sub 3 guys every dead ball, and just run the other team out the gym..

by ChrisPorter on Jan 26, 2009 7:53 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

why...

does that chicken have hella friggin’ wings? wtf?

B*tch! I GO so hard!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Jan 28, 2009 2:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

are you serious? you didnt get that?

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 28, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

very clever

i don’t know…i guess i was just a little freaked out when i saw hella wings.

B*tch! I GO so hard!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Jan 29, 2009 1:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah Morrow will play 2 or 3

while Belinelli will pretty much stay at 1

I will always be your fan JRich. Good Luck

by chili01 on Jan 26, 2009 8:58 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Wrong Question 2.0

Another team will likely make the choice for us – as in they will ask for one or the other in a trade package when we try to unload one of our under-performing, overcompensated veterans

by hardcore on Jan 26, 2009 9:01 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Wrong Question 3.0

It not Morrow vs. Marco. We need both. It’s about Marco vs. CJ… Marco 100 times more! Marco can defend, pass, shoot. CJ has been better lately, but the guy cannot pass. Cannot create.

by lucap on Jan 26, 2009 9:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Still need a 3rd guard

In case of injuries. CJ would work well there and he wouldn’t mind I bet, since he is from Vegas which is quite close to the bay.

by mosdl on Jan 26, 2009 9:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

other teams are starting to like CJ alot especially for his price, but i dont think he’d be anything other than filler in a trade

by THIZZ-A-LOT on Jan 26, 2009 9:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rocky and Tyrone(Morrow)

hmm, One’s a playermaker, one’s a shooter and Hustler..
I’d keep both, and If they lose either one to another team, He’ll get better because a once a player leaves an old team, they seem to step they game up.

by AlbinoWhale on Jan 26, 2009 10:19 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

indeed.

see: Steve Francis

by vinchenzy on Jan 26, 2009 11:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

KEEP morrow and belinelli.. TRADE crawford or magette for a PF..

belinelli will develop into a more efficient crawford.. and we should trade either crawford or magette while they still have value.. we can get a pretty solid veteran big man at 10-13 million a year.. or we can try to slang him off for a draft pick or expiring contract…

now that michael redd is off the market… i’m sure playoffs teams will be calling our front office for some scorers..

by bay way hooligan on Jan 26, 2009 11:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Very true!!! Thanks Micheal Redd...

Didn’t make that connection but it could only help us out.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 27, 2009 12:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ok lets say they deal Crawford for a PF. Craw by himself is a pretty steep (I’d say impossible) task, but for the sake of argument lets say they get it done. So then you have -
PG-Monta (34 minutes)/CJ (10 minutes)/Belinelli (4 minutes)
SG-Jackson (34 minutes)/Morrow (10 minutes)/ Belinelli (4 minutes)
SF-Maggette (34 minutes)/Buike(14 minutes)
I still dont think those bench guys are getting enough playing time. We probably need to deal 2 PG/Wing players. Belinelli has best trade value to value to our team ratio and makes the best trade candidate. He makes the package more attractive to another team and clears more playing time, I really dont see the case against a Craw/Belinelli/Wright package being shopped agressively.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 12:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i’m sure playoffs teams will be calling our front office for some scorers..

yup, bet the phone wires are burning up …

oh wait, they’re cordless now huh?

by hardcore on Jan 27, 2009 12:21 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

how bout

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=796831241961531901654973242&teams=289952852828&te=&cash=

We’re giving up a lot but clearing a lot of cap room and Varejao would at least be serviceable at the 4 if we cant find a better alternative.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 12:51 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

worst trade ever

are you joking with me

by montadaboss on Jan 27, 2009 9:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yep

13 mil off the books and a decent PF sounds pretty terrible, doesnt it? Not to mention erasing the memory of the bad Crawford trade and bad Maggette signing. Oh, and we could use the offseason money to land Odom or Sheed as there probably wont be anyone willing/able to give either any more than MLE money. Potentially-
PG-Monta/CJ
SG-Jackson/Monta/Morrow
SF-Buike/Morrow/Randolph
PF-Odom/Varejao/Randolph
C-Biedrins/Turiaf
-add a lottery pick rookie to that (and we dont HAVE to pray for Griffin, we’re free to take BPA even if it is a guard)

Worst trade ever? I think not, you just gotta have a little perspective. Also try to remember that trades that other teams might actually agree to arent necessarily bad trades for us.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

honestly

I would much rather see Morrow and CJ play than Beli.

by danschmeck on Jan 27, 2009 12:53 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

morrow will improve too

last game against the clips, they ran a series of plays for him, using turiaf as a screener. on one occasion, morrow used the screen, hesitated with the ball and then dropped a perfect dime to turiaf. on another occasion he drove in on the break and made a nice mid-air adjustment and finish. I’ve seen this kid improve in almost every game he’s gotten minutes in-rebounding, passing, and hustle d.

by ChrisPorter on Jan 27, 2009 9:53 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Both will improve

Marco is becoming a 1 while morrow is becoming a 2.

Morrow needs to improve his D and rebounding, and looks like that is happening (still far to go on D).

Marco’s D improved majorly, so whoever taught marco D should work with morrow.

Morrow we can keep for cheap while he develops I think, so why hurry?

by mosdl on Jan 27, 2009 12:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Morrow

On the subject of Morrow improving, I’ve also noticed that they are running him off of screens more often. I’ve seen at least a couple times where he comes off the screen, catches the ball cleanly, seems to be squared up for the shot and has space from his defender but hesitates to put up the shot. IIRC he usually pump fakes, puts the ball on the floor and then passes when he realizes his man is now set defensively and he no longer has an advantage.

That’s one big way he can improve right there. If the team is going to go to the trouble of running a set play for you, then you need to be aggressive in finishing the play. With a 3pt% that high you can see that he only takes a shot when he is comfortable and very confident that it will drop. He could stand to get a good deal more aggressive without hurting the team. If he got more shots up and his % dropped down to say 40-45% from 3 that is still better than most of our other options on any given possession.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Jan 27, 2009 1:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yet

He can score a 3 in transition just like sjax. Hopefully the coaches have noticed this and work with him on that. It could be he is looking to pass for a better shot, but I agree, he should shoot that.

by mosdl on Jan 27, 2009 1:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather get rid of any of the guards not named Monta and any of the big men not named Andris for a real PF.

by Slicker on Jan 27, 2009 1:16 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

a)

any of the guards not named Monta

b)

any of the big men not named Andris

c)

for a real PF

I think youll find it very difficult to take a) and b) and get c) Even more difficult without including Marco in a)

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 27, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

and D.) draft pick

and C) can also come in the form of a draft pick – a la Blake Griffen

by Slicker on Jan 27, 2009 3:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, it’s sad how other teams bigs always have huge games against us. We need a 4 in a bad way. BTW, Bass looked real good tonight.

by jmaaan on Jan 28, 2009 11:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I chose Morrow, I love that dude.

by belilaugh on Jan 27, 2009 2:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

If I had to chose one over the other, I’d rather have Morrow. We already have too many guards and Morrow plays well at the 3. Belinellis is a 1 and we have several of those already. I’d rather see Bellinelli traded over Morrow.

Ellis to the RIM!
Monta for the win?! YES!

by XIAOXIAO on Jan 27, 2009 9:27 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

at last a good fanpost

wow, lots of good comments here on a topic that is important to the dubs. however, i think that its no problem burying these guys on the bench if craw and monta are healthy (still waiting).

although, he’s made great strides in using screens and shot selection, where morrow has really improved these last two games in ball-handling. the only reason this shooter was not drafted was his abyssmal handles. that probably factored in why he was so good at moving without the ball. he was so terrible at moving with it. but, that’s quickly not the case any more. he led the team in minutes against the clips! that tells me that when he got figured out the first time, that nellie asked him to get better handles to create his own shot or dish, and he improved. that’s good leadership from an undrafted rookie.

marco was really raw when he arrived. he had to learn how to play d with his feet and immediately earned the refs respect against teh celtics. the celtics! he took his cheap shots and got back up. i still don’t like him as a shooter yet. but, he does seem to have some value as a big 1 if he can defend the position.

i’m happy with these guys as practice players as it will force the starters to raise their own defensive games. this is a good thing. its great when depth can be used to sustain intensity. we play emotionally and better under chaotic conditions. we’ve got two guys that are improving. keep both.

"We're Menudo," -BB

by eshock on Jan 27, 2009 10:30 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

tl;dr
has anyone suggested making marco the second string one guard behing crawf
and morrow the second string two guard behind monta?

by so ill so d0pe on Jan 27, 2009 10:53 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

does any one know if crawford is playing against dallas

by GSW9 on Jan 28, 2009 7:49 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I would..

keep em both if i could. I would let Marco get minutes as the reserve play making point with a smoothe outside shot. Then i would let Morrow come off the bench to relieve Monta or Crawford and put points on the board. the kid can flat out shoot! he’s really the only pure shooter we have on this team and when you have a pure shooter, it’s very valueable for your team. defenses can’t play off of him and must always keep him close which in turn will create space for other guys to operate. Not only shooting, but this dude is super scrappy on the boards and i love that. he always plays hard and with a lot of passion and intensity. i can see this kid growing to be a very effective player in this league. Plus, we’d be idiots not too pick up the option on him. He won’t be too expensive to keep around.

B*tch! I GO so hard!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Jan 28, 2009 2:49 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Now Marco's a 1?

I guess when you’re used to watching Crawford, Jax and Monta play the 1, you start to think anything is possible.

The guy has good handles, he has good court awareness and decent vision, and he gets the game, so he makes nice passes. That does not make him a 1. It makes him a good passing 2 with some playmaking ability.

Can you imagine him trying to guard 1’s? That’s a scary thought. Can you really see him running the break or getting the team into half court sets? I can’t. He’s a euroballer, he’s good in a movement offense but he is not a 1.

by jmaaan on Jan 28, 2009 11:48 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Word. Monta, Crawford, Belinelli, Jackson...

None are true ones, but all are above average passing two guards. Since we don’t have a dominant #1 the more of them we have on the court the better.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 29, 2009 2:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That still hasn’t lead to increased production on the court. It also looks like each guy is turnover prone and still can’t cumulatively fill the shoes that Baron did.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Jan 29, 2009 2:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Give them time to gel...

Really hard finding any continuity with the “1 in, 1 out” policy the Warriors have been employing. Part of our success the past two years was we avoided major injuries… this year new cast, more injuries = bad basketball.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 29, 2009 11:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i'm not defining him as a 1 whatsoever..

I can see him playing a bit at the 1. why not? we don’t have a true point anyway. Marcus is our only one but since he doesn’t even get to see the light of day, what good is he? CJ is our next closest thing to a 1 but he is not a true point. He’s more of anundersized 2 if you ask me.

B*tch! I GO so hard!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag415 on Jan 29, 2009 1:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And Monta still has a long road back, it seems. It might take a while just for him to get his 2 guard game going again. Much less begin the trasition into a “real” 1. So, do we move forward and assume he’s our 2 of the future, which would require us looking for the 1 of the future? Do we cross our fingers and give him time to develop, which might not happen until mid year next year, if he can come around? Do we try a stopgap measure of bringing in a backup passing 1, who can play alongside Monta until Monta takes over? Do we just go with our current methodogy of trying to put a bunch of passers on the floor with no real 1? Or do we move Monta in a trade?

Contracts and lack of rings make it impossible, but after watching last nights game, I wouldn’t mind have Kidd playing alongside Ellis for a couple of years getting 20-25 minutes a game. Don’t think he’ll sign with us for the MLE next offseason, though.

by jmaaan on Jan 29, 2009 9:55 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

after watching last nights game, I wouldn’t mind have Kidd playing alongside Ellis for a couple of years getting 20-25 minutes a game.

  We’ve got Marcus sttin on the bench who’s about as good as kidd is at this state in his career. Nellie just don’t want a point guard in the lineup.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 29, 2009 10:25 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Now I want Morrow

But I want Belinelli when he is back.

by gswlego on Jan 29, 2009 6:16 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

well i think we keep monta at the one and let him develop for the rest of the year and over the summer

and eventually he’ll be a great 1. look at devin harris he is not that much better than ellis and he’s an all star. he’s averaging about 6.5 assits and 21 points whose to say monta can’t average that or better once he’s back to 100%

by GSW9 on Jan 30, 2009 8:21 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Harris’ track record as a PG has been better than Ellis’. In the NBA and in the NCAA.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Feb 1, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

?

NCAA? yes Harris’ NCAA career was better than Monta’s. Probably because, you know, his NCAA career existed unlike Monta’s. Until Harris’ breakout year this season, Monta has been the better NBA player.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Feb 1, 2009 10:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The more I think about it

the more I want to include Beli with JC or CJ to get a real PG. What is the point at having so many ‘decent-good’ level PG’s? What we need is a GREAT PG that can lead this team out of this mess of a season. I really liked Beli’s intensity earlier this season, but I just don’t feel like he has potential to be one of the best PGs.

As for Morrow, he will flourish even more once we get a real PG, the more he can just catch and shoot the better he’ll be.
As far as I’m concerned, the kid’s a real keep.

by FishStix on Jan 30, 2009 2:33 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Belinelli

“I really liked Beli’s intensity earlier this season, but I just don’t feel like he has potential to be one of the best PGs”

Thats cause he’s not a point-guard, he’s an off guard. It’s been said 100x already but if you compare belinelli’s game to morrows, thats what makes belinelli stick out most to me. As of now, Morrow is strictly an offguard “catch and shoot” player. He isn’t going to create his own offense very often, and he will almost never create offense for other people. Belinelli is a player who can not only bring the ball up the court, but he can run the offense. I like to think of him as a weaker version of stephen jackson, a player who can do alot of different things okay instead of shining in any one particular spot.

Truth be told, id rather get rid of Watson before either Morrow or Belinelli since Watson is more like a undersized off-guard then he is a point guard.

by kyzah on Jan 30, 2009 3:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Beli can contribute to offense… can being the key word here. But so can JC, so can SJ, so can CJ. Well at this point this whole forum (myself included) is sounding like a broken record, but my main point is that we have all these guys that can pass when the timing is just right, but also turn it over, and in general just aren’t the facilitators we need. That’s why one, two, three of them need to be traded away for someone who can make things happen, lead, restore confidence in the team. If we can’t trade only the guys mentioned above, I’d throw in Randolph, MWill, Kurz, Maggette, pretty much anyone on the team but BWright/Beans/Moped.

by FishStix on Jan 30, 2009 3:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How many great PGs are there?

Please list them and how we could realistically acquire them.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jan 30, 2009 3:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Please list them and how we could realistically acquire them.

     We don’t need a top point guard, just one dedicated point guard. Portland plays Blake, Who did the Sonics use? Earl Waston? How about the Lakers, Fishers or Farmar? Nothing fancy there, we just need a serviceable point guard and some better bigs. 37 mediocre shooting guards never gets a team anywhere and Nellie’s old enough that he should know that by now.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 30, 2009 3:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marcus Williams

feels disrespected.

by gswlego on Jan 30, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marcus Williams disrespected.

  Yeah, If he was on the Lakers he’d be a star :>)

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 30, 2009 9:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We dont need a great point guard.

i would feel good about going into next season with Aaron Brooks, AC Law, or Chris Quinn type of player to back up Monta at the 1. Off the top of my head, Anthony Randolph and Jamal Crawford for AC Law and a sign and trade of Josh Childress. Toss in Marco to close the deal.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Feb 2, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Josh Childress? The Josh Childress who is under contract in Greece on a multi year deal? How exactly do you propose the Warriors and Hawks convince him to try to back out of his deal there (where he’s making about $10 mil per) to come back to the NBA?

by jae on Feb 2, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If I remeber correctly,

Childress has an opt out claus after every season so that he has the option to come back to the NBA if he wants to.

From all the articles I read, playing in Europe isnt all it cracked out to be(way worse accomadation, pay problems, etc) I think that JC was looking for a get away from Atlanta and that wasnt possible unless he could of gotten a team to over pay him so ATL wouldnt match or to take the QO and suck it up for one more season in ATL. If there is any team he would come back to, I think he wouldnt mind coming back to the Bay Area.

The $10 million figure was with the euro/dollar conversion at the time of the signing and now that the recession has hit worldwide, the dollar is crawling back up to the euro.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Feb 2, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

or

convince them they need another combo guard who mostly just scores and another young tweener forward?

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Feb 2, 2009 1:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bibby is a free agent,

and Joe Johnson(one of my favorites in the Association) can play the point. The Hawks have the weakest bench for any playoff caliber team. they could use a guy like Randolph in the future.

We will probably need to be patient and let this season play out.
-warriorsvictim

by warriorsscore110 on Feb 2, 2009 7:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm....

I wouldn’t mind seeing Bibby running our team…

by FishStix on Feb 3, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Morrow is better to have because the Warriors needed to rebuild their backcourt with Baron leaving last summer. If I chose to have Marco Belinelli, the Warriors will have too many swing players at which players can be losing minutes.

by gswarriors2009 on Jan 31, 2009 7:02 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

are you saying marco isnt a backcourt player?

I’m not sure i’ve seen him play a single game for us this season where he played at anything but the 1 or 2 spot. Please elaborate on how morrow fits in to the warriors backcourt, but marco doesn’t.

by kyzah on Jan 31, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

haha

so you want to get a 26 year old, 4 time all star (not really sure thats correct, could be more), big man who averaged 25 and 9 last year, but if they ask for Ronny freakin Turiaf in the package thats a dealbreaker for you? Lucky for you it will never happen.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Jan 31, 2009 8:52 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You are all true fans and I love it, but Im almost out of gas with these boys

Kudos to the crew who created GSOM, much much much love, particularly in 07. Im born and raised in SF. Been a Warrior fans since 86, when Jordan entered the game. They and the Giants, are the only teams that I will follow through and through no matter what. From TMC, to Sarunas, to the Webber era, to Spreewell, Starks, Gatling, DFish, Big Vic, and the much missed JRich, and the Baron. Its been a lot of good times. I have come to realize, that if 2007 marks the best the Warriors will ever achieve, then thats ok with me. Because I was there at Jillian’s in the Metreon, during the playoffs with an over capacity, fire-hazard crowd, all frenetically cheering with patient tears in their eyes at the hysteria and sheer unbelievability of the best situation in sports, albeit America, the underdog was kickin ass. And I will never forget those three magical weeks, which was MY championship. Always be proud of them, because they typified the SF Bay. Always innovative, fearless, strong, and never say die. Luck just doesn’t seem to fall their way. Too many ridiculously close games. So please, no more talk of trade, you will never get there if all you do is the quick fix. Sports is such crap these days, no loyalty. Alright I’ll shut up now. Thank you for this.

by crazywarrior on Feb 3, 2009 11:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

you will never get there if all you do is the quick fix

I know, look how bad that panned out for the Celtics.

"It’s a hobby of mine. Kind of like collecting your fingernail clippings or pooping in jars." -olympic mike

by sam23 on Feb 4, 2009 11:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I give the edge to Belinelli.

I think Morrow will develop into a very fine off the bench shooter while Marco seems to show more all-around potential.

by Hatalles on Feb 5, 2009 5:09 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Morrow’s defense is slightly better than Marco but IMO I think Marco has a better upside while Morrow will be a plain shooter unless he expands his game.

" Yes.............No..............GOOGLE!"

by AlbinoWhale on Feb 8, 2009 10:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

We_re_back__small
Terms of Service and Moderation on GSoM...
Small
Five Good Things So Far
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
The Warriors as Simpsons
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Live-Tweeting from Row 8!!! (GSoM's Charity Auction seats)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help Fire Don Nelson By Signing Petition
Follett_small
The Golden State Warriors players have already given up on Don Nelson
Photo-225x300_small
On Mikki Moore, Anthony Randolph, and 'Done' Nelson
Oaklandathletics_small
facebook Members: Keep the A's in OAKLAND
Small
They're bad
Clipsnation_small
Attention SoCal Dubs Fans
Small
Why Wright's injury could help the team
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Need extras in a basketball-related Doritos commercial
Small
Time to get someone to listen (ala Cleveland Browns)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GSoM Motto

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae