Jeff Van Gundy: Chris Mullin's a "Good Administrator"-- What?
ESPN's Jeff Van Gundy (who would make a fantastic Defensive Coordinator for the Warriors right now) during last night's trashing by the Mavs via Nellie should be glad Jeff Van Gundy and Mark Jackson aren't covering Warriors [Examiner]:
My question is why is Chris Mullin being treated like he's being treated in Golden State right now? One of the great players; good administrator. Did he make some moves that in hindsight you question? Yeah. But he got rid of the bad contracts. He's built a good team. He's done a good job. I don't understand why they're making him go through this. Either fire him and let him go someplace else or let him do his job.
Make the jump for some very detailed answers to Van Gundy's questions and thoughts about this Warriors roster.
My question is why is Chris Mullin being treated like he's being treated in Golden State right now?
My question is why does the media continue to break out the kiddie gloves for Chris Mullin? What exactly have the Warriors done to mistreat him? Just like when Mullin lied to Jason Richardson and said he wouldn't trade him, but then moved him in that silly cost cutting move- it's a business. Mullin simply hasn't performed and his assemblage of this young and dumb (in terms of hoops IQ), defenseless, NBDL, 6th men paid like stars roster is a complete joke. I fully understand why Mullin's ambivalent attitude to Monta Ellis violating his contract, lying about it, and missing half of this past season didn't exactly strike a chord with team President Robert Rowell and owner Chris Cohan (not that either of them are the least bit professional or competent).
One of the great players
Mullin was indeed a great player- not Hall of Fame great, but a Dream Teamer and a very fun player (aside from his D). But what does that have to do with Chris Mullin the GM/ VP? You don't keep someone on in a role that they were never fit for hire, just because they were great for you in some other unrelated role years ago.
good adminstrator
So good that during his 5 year tenure with the Dubs, the rosters he's assembled have made the playoffs once? Pre-Nellie Mullin was absolutely clueless and way in over his head. All of the moves that are supposedly his alone- the Marcus Williams trade, drafting Marco Belinelli and believing he was a good replacement for Jason Richardson, keeping Brandan Wright, inking 2nd round bust Kosta Perovic to a 2 year $3.5 million deal with a 3rd year team option (most likely the most foolishly lucrative 2nd round signing of all time) look pretty bad right now. Where's the good administration?
Did he make some moves that in hindsight you question? Yeah.
Inking Derek Fisher, Adonal Foyle, Mike Dunleavy, and Troy Murphy to those silly deals, blowing all those draft picks (Ike Diogu and Patrick O'Bryant isn't exactly great like Jamison's back-to-back 51's), trading away Jason Richardson to get even younger, softer, and more inexperienced, failing to use multiple large trade exceptions, signing Austin Croshere and Troy Hudson- didn't all just look like absolutely clueless moves in hindsight, but they looked like incredibly foolish decisions at the time and signs of a man not fit for managing a half a billion dollar corporation. Let's not forget Mullin's complete inability over his 4.5 year VP/GM tenure with the Warriors to find a good starting power forward who can rebound and score at a high percentage.
But he got rid of the bad contracts.
Not entirely true. Foyle's still on the books this year for $6.8 million-- would've been a great expiring contract, but oh well. And since when does an NBA GM get props for buying out contracts from the likes of Kosta Perovic and Sarunas Jasikevicius? Yes, he did indeed manage to dump those silly gift contracts to Dunleavy and Murphy to Larry Bird and the Pacers, but what's the point when about 1.5 years later you're going to overspend it on Corey Maggette? Digging yourself out of the hole you dug yourself into and continue to dig, shouldn't earn you points.
He's built a good team.
14-32 never felt so "good"!
He's done a good job.
For who? The NBDL? During the telecast Van Gundy was praising Mullin for his scouting and all the D-League finds on the Warriors roster. Well let's be fair. None of these guys are top 50 or even top 100 (maybe even 150) players in the NBA. Mullin's had to "find" so many NBDL players to populate this roster precisely because he's lost on so many other moves as the VP/ GM of this team.
I don't understand why they're making him go through this. Either fire him and let him go someplace else or let him do his job.
Look, I like Mullin. Great player. Every time I've seen him in person, he's been a really nice guy and by all reports I've heard and read that that's not just my imagination. But I really don't understand what he's "going through". If it's so bad (which I doubt it is) he can resign or quit.
As a longtime head coach in this league (and a damn good one who's one of my all time favs) I'm pretty surprised at Van Gundy's stance on Mullin. If Van Gundy was coaching under Mullin he'd go absolutely nuts. Nuts. NUTS.
Do think you really think Van Gundy would be happy about having to coach the worst defensive backcourt in the league featuring Monta Ellis (hasn't even tried on D since his second year in the league), Jamal Crawford (the next time he's in the right position on D will be his first in a Warriors uni), CJ Watson (let's just say he didn't get called up from the NBDL for his D), Kelenna Azubuike (maybe the easiest big minute player in the league to beat off the dribble), and Marco Belinelli (soft). At the wings there's Corey Maggette (would play D if it would get him to the free throw line) and Stephen Jackson (half the time he doesn't get back on D because he's complaining about some non-call). Up front there's Andris Biedrins (can't guard a single 4 or 5 in the league mano y mano and routinely surrenders career nights to opposing big men), Brandan Wright (it looks like he's playing zone when the rest of the team is playing man and playing man when the rest of the team is playing zone), and Anthony Randolph (just isn't physically ready to play D in the NBA). The best defender on this team Ronny Turiaf thinks good D = blocking shots and nothing else.
You really think Jeff Van "Pat Riley Part II" Gundy would be having any of that? If Van Gundy was given that roster he'd drag Mullin by the feet like Alonzo Mourning out of the Roaracle.
Now I don't doubt for a second that Van Gundy could have this current Warriors team playing better D than Nellie. Not for a second. Van Gundy's a phenomenal defensive coach. But it'd be at the cost of plenty of offense and I doubt it would make that much of a difference in the win column (if any). Nellie's a phenomenal offensive coach. Coaching ain't the problem here. It's the ZERO All-Star roster that's way too young (i.e. not ready) for the NBA.
More and more it looks like the local and national media are looking for nothing but great story lines to make this horrendous 2008-2009 Golden State Warriors season interesting. Even if it's undeserved and unfair. Someone's got to be the good guy ("poor Mullin the good administrator", "poor rookie Anthony Randolph who can't get any playing time"- by the way AR's already played more minutes than Andris Biedrins, Brandan Wright, Marco Belinelli, and even Ronny Turiaf did during their rookie seasons) and someone's got to be the bad guy (all the Nellie-haters who can't name a single coach who could coach this terrible and banged up roster to a significantly better record).
But I can sympathize with them. It's hard watching this organization's sorry product night-in and night-out and it's even harder writing or talking about it. (Thank goodness- We Got Jokes.) It's really not that enjoyable to analyze a non-playoff team for the 15th time in 17 long, long, long years.
4 recs |
66 comments
Comments
Mullin
is only getting love from people because he “allegedly” wanted to keep Baron which would have apparently fixed all the team’s problems we had this year.
by saintdee on Jan 29, 2009 3:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding
JVG is correct! All the moves this season were clearly made by Bobby Rowell with the okay of weak ass Cohan. Nellie is a joke and is just waiting to get fired so he can go back to Hawaii and laugh all the way to the bank. Mullin is in limbo and it is clear the Dubs have been turned over to Bobby for another 10 year drought. Fire him and let him go with Donnie Walsh to NYC. Damn I hate the fact that the Dubs owner and team president are both petty power hungry douche bags. Go Dubs! We need to start a FI-RE BOB-BY! chants because &% him anyway!
by DubsfaninAZ on Jan 29, 2009 4:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
yyeeeahhh
I begrudgingly will agree w/you on your sentiments towards Mullin. Begrudglingly, because I love Chris Mullin and he had a pure jump shot. But at the end of the day, Mullin has done a horrendous job. Five years is a lot of time to put his vision out on the floor. There really is absolutely no factor of the warriors he hasn’t eff’d up.
For me, it will always come down to signing Dunleavy. To anything. Ever. Let’s say we’re playing a pickup game. You and I are team captains, and I get the first pick. Then you. Now me again. ..
…
1000 players later, who would actually take Dunleavy on their team? Willingly? And for huge years and cash? That’s a display of utter incompetence, top to bottom, throughout the organization. It hurts, but its true. I just can’t see anyone, even a quasi-apologist such as myself, able to defend Mullin. In any form or fashion. So sad, but so true.
"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."
by GameSix on Jan 29, 2009 4:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Horrible as in leading us to the best two seasons our franchise has seen
in 15 years, then yea thats horrible. You can thank Nellie and Rowell for this season.
by pbra17 on Jan 30, 2009 9:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as bad as Nellie’s supposedly been this year, the last two year’s were all Nellie. not Mullin.
Gary St Jean did a better job drafting than Mullin. they both got lucky once in the 2nd round (Arenas and Ellis), but comparing their 1st rounders…
Jamison, JRich, Murphy, Pietrus, Dunleavy…..
vs
Andris, Diogu, POB, BW, Marco, AR…..
where Mullin has been better than St Jean is in trades (obvious), but he’s worse than St Jean in terms of signing FA’s (obvious).
by the evil monkey on Jan 30, 2009 11:21 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
whoops, posted on accident when i meant to preview.
anyway the difference in the 2 best Warriors seasons was basically Musselman vs Nelson. and now, Mullin’s best move (bringing in Nelson), has also supposedly become his worst move.
by the evil monkey on Jan 30, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mullin’s best move (bringing in Nelson), has also supposedly become his worst move.
That’s just the nature of nellie, big hat no cattle. did the same thing about 10 years ago, his system gets a team to a certain point then hits the ceiling. Mullin is just a poor student of history. Musselman would have been a better long term choice, or at least no worse.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 30, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
pretty much
though considering the last 13 years, i would of taken that (5 or 6 yrs of playoffs at the 5th-8th seed). too bad Mully loves skinny left handers and moved J-Rich for Wright.
by the evil monkey on Jan 30, 2009 12:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as bad as Nellie’s supposedly been this year, the last two year’s were all Nellie. not Mullin.
Andris Biedrins was all Nellie, even though Nellie’s biggest influence on him was to unnaturally suppress his minutes? Baron Davis was all Nellie, even though Nellie’s only influence on Baron was to let him do whatever he wanted?
Nellie did a good coaching job from ‘06 to ’08, but to argue he was the sole reason things got better is ridiculous. There was a sharp uptick in the talent level on this team. And now that it’s ticked back down again, Nellie looks completely hapless.
Also, that’s a pretty incomplete comparison of Mullin and St. Jean’s drafts. Slot matters. This is the real comparison:
Jamison (4th), J-Rich (5th), Murphy (14th), Dunleavy (3rd), Pietrus (11th)
vs.
Biedrins (11th), Diogu (8th), POB (9th), BW (8th), Marco (18th), Randolph (14th)
St. Jean had three top-five picks… the result was Dunleavy, Antawn and J-Rich. That’s solid — those weren’t strong drafts either — but no better than solid. When you have the third or fourth pick of a draft, you’d like to think you’d be able to draft a difference-maker. St. Jean never did. Mullin landed Biedrins at 11, and with all due respect and love to Antawn and J-Rich, Biedrins is the best and most useful player in either group.
Who drafted better? I’m not sure. On the one hand, St. Jean never had an embarrassing POB-style whiff, and probably never had a pick as bad as Diogu, either. On the other hand, Mullin landed the best player, and had worse slots to pick from. Mullin also supplemented his drafts by adding decent supporting talent from the D-League… St. Jean never added a non-draftee of value. In addition, the stories of some of Mullin’s draft picks have yet to be written; it’s too early to know what kind of values BW and Randolph will end up giving for their slots (my guess is good and mediocre, respectively, but we’ll see).
I’m open to the idea that St. Jean drafted better than Mullin, but I think it’s very, very close, and when you add in ‘Buike, CJ and Morrow, I think Mullin pulls comfortably ahead. Let’s not forget how bad those Jamison/JRich/Dunleavy teams actually were.
Mullin has been better than St Jean is in trades (obvious), but he’s worse than St Jean in terms of signing FA’s (obvious).
Well, other than the loony Fisher signing, Mullin’s big sin has been extending his own guys, not signing others. And he definitely found religion in the last couple years. Mullin played some good, savvy hardball with Barnes and Pietrus last summer, and got a great price on ‘Buike by waiting him out; he got Turiaf at a good price this summer, Maggette at a middling one (it was an overpay in context, but not a big overpay for value). St. Jean, by contrast, didn’t do much in free agency. Doing nothing is better than extending crazy contracts to Foyle and Dunleavy, but I have trouble seeing St. Jean’s free agency history as a positive.
The revisionist history around here is starting to get absurd. We were a good team last year. Nellie did a fine job, sure, but there wasnt any strategic brilliance behind last year’s team — if anything, Nellie cost us a few towards the end by riding Baron and Jack too hard. Last year’s team won 48 games mainly because they were talented enough to win. And Mullin put that team together.
by onlxn on Jan 30, 2009 12:18 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Andris Biedrins was all Nellie, even though Nellie’s biggest influence on him was to unnaturally suppress his minutes?
yes, Nellie picked Andris over Foyle. something most coaches won’t do.
Baron Davis was all Nellie, even though Nellie’s only influence on Baron was to let him do whatever he wanted?
this is what makes Baron, Baron. as the Clips are seeing, he’s not the same in a structured system. prior to Nellie, the Baron trade netted us an overpaid PG who led us to 30 some wins.
St. Jean never added a non-draftee of value.
that was Nellie too. other GMs saw what Mully saw. Barnes played for Sac, 76ers. KAz was in camp with Houston and the Cavs. Morrow with Miami. other than Nellie, what coach picks non-guaranteed guys over guaranteed ones? none. w/o Barnes, We Believe doesn’t happen.
Mullin’s big sin has been extending his own guys.
that and dismantling We Believe by trading J-Rich. it would of been nice to have a sustained play off run and shown loyalty to the player who deserved it most. extending your own guys is fine, but extending them to ridiculous deals that are 2x their market values is incompetence at its finest.
We were a good team last year.
depends on your definition of good. if you mean top 10 teams in the NBA (out of 30), then no, we weren’t good. we were 12th out of 30. and i doubt 13 (Cleveland) was worse than us. the reality is we were slightly above average (14-16th place).
if anything, Nellie cost us a few towards the end by riding Baron and Jack too hard.
dude, you can just as well say that he won us more games in the middle of the season, by riding them. he wouldn’t of had that problem if Mully hadn’t got rid of J-Rich.
by the evil monkey on Jan 30, 2009 12:44 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
yes, Nellie picked Andris over Foyle. something most coaches won’t do.
I’m not sure where you get that from. Biedrins was a highly touted project, who was already playing extremely well by the end of the ‘05-’06 season. The plan was always for him to supplant Foyle… any coach would’ve gone with that transition. Frankly, Nellie underplayed Biedrins in the previous two seasons.
this is what makes Baron, Baron. as the Clips are seeing, he’s not the same in a structured system. prior to Nellie, the Baron trade netted us an overpaid PG who led us to 30 some wins.
I don’t entirely disagree… Nellie’s unstructured system was a good one for Baron.
But the main difference between Baron last year and Baron this year isn’t system - it’s conditioning. Baron gave his all in his contract year, and has largely phoned it in in terms of conditioning this year. Nellie wouldn’t have gotten another ’07’08 out of Baron this season, either… nobody would have.
I’m not dinging Nellie’s handling of Baron… he handled Baron extremely well. But Baron was motivated last year in a way he hadn’t previously been, other than during “We Believe”. I give Nellie all the credit in the world for the “We Believe” run, but was last year from Baron a result of Nellie’s brilliance or Baron giving his all when some money was on the line? My eyes and head both tell me the latter.
that was Nellie too. other GMs saw what Mully saw. Barnes played for Sac, 76ers. KAz was in camp with Houston and the Cavs. Morrow with Miami. other than Nellie, what coach picks non-guaranteed guys over guaranteed ones? none. w/o Barnes, We Believe doesn’t happen.
I give Nellie credit for being willing to play off-the-radar guys, and I’d credit Barnes to Nellie. But are you really suggesting that Mullin deserves zero credit for finding and signing some of these guys? Nellie had never even heard of Azubuike when Mullin signed him (at Sidney Moncrief’s suggestion, so credit there). Mullin is the guy who grabbed Watson. Those guys are giving us 23 efficient points a game right now. You think the GM that signed him deserves zero credit for that?
that and dismantling We Believe by trading J-Rich.
God, this again…
I’ll say flat-out: I don’t think we would’ve made the playoffs last year if we’d kept J-Rich. I think we very well might have done worse. Minutes for J-Rich would’ve meant fewer minutes for Monta, and since Monta’s the better player, that would’ve hurt us. Between Monta, Jack, Azubuike, Barnes and Pietrus, we were pretty set at the wings last year. The team had problems — rebounding underneath, interior defense, no backup for Baron for much of the year — but J-Rich wouldn’t have helped much with any of them.
I love J-Rich. I loved “We Believe”. I loved J-Rich during “We Believe.” But to contend that he was a key piece of our puzzle going forward would be to believe the results of 25 games over hundreds of others, before and since. J-Rich does not do that much to help his teams win basketball games, and he especially wouldn’t have helped a team with a superior shooting guard.
it would of been nice to have a sustained play off run and shown loyalty to the player who deserved it most.
I see no reason to believe that the latter would’ve led to the former.
Would it’ve been nice to keep J-Rich? In a karmic, friendly, Kumbaya sorta way? Sure.
Would it have made basketball sense? I really don’t think so.
extending your own guys is fine, but extending them to ridiculous deals that are 2x their market values is incompetence at its finest.
Agreed. Nobody’s defending Mullin’s ‘04-’06 work… we’re talking about the last two years.
depends on your definition of good. if you mean top 10 teams in the NBA (out of 30), then no, we weren’t good. we were 12th out of 30. and i doubt 13 (Cleveland) was worse than us. the reality is we were slightly above average (14-16th place).
Okay, fine. We were an above-average team with a bright future — with promising young talent and 18 million bucks in contracts set to expire in the biggest free agent summer in the history of basketball. That was Nellie’s doing???
dude, you can just as well say that he won us more games in the middle of the season, by riding them. he wouldn’t of had that problem if Mully hadn’t got rid of J-Rich.
1) J-Rich’s presence wouldn’t have helped Baron’s minutes… Nellie didn’t want Monta at the point as it stood.
2) It’s not at all clear that riding Stephen Jackson hard leads to more wins. It is clear that getting heavy minutes to a tired Stephen Jackson leads to more losses. As this season has shown, Nellie continues to be unaware of that.
I’m not saying that Nellie’s coaching from ‘06-’08 was bad. It was very, very good. But the idea that Nellie was solely responsible for the team’s success is silly. Mullin turned a pretty bad roster into a pretty good one.
by onlxn on Jan 30, 2009 1:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hm. i’m not trying to argue solely responsible. by “it was all Nellie”, i mean that instead of being a 30-39 the We Believe season and a low 40 win team last yr, we got to 42 and 48 respectively, b/c of Nelson. so outside of Nellie instead of Musselman, is Mully all that better than a crappy GM like St Jean? imo, his draft record and monetary decisions would lean towards no.
Biedrins was a highly touted project, who was already playing extremely well by the end of the ‘05-’06 season.
uh… what? when a team is no longer mathematically in the picture, all the young players play those last 10-20. that’s why Diogu, AB and Monta were all playing heavy minutes – and Diogu was actually the most successful of the 3 (a recent example is Ramon Sessions).
AB was neither highly toutedn prospect or a guarantee to replace Foyle. i have no idea where it was said otherwise. i remember this vividly b/c i was one of the FEW people who thought AB wasn’t a bust and would at least be a very good back up. and that he just needed to cut down on his foul rate which most rookies do.
But are you really suggesting that Mullin deserves zero credit for finding and signing some of these guys?
no, by listing the other places these guys got invites, what i am suggesting is that other GMs have done the same. they only stick with Nellie. before Nellie, Mully supposedly never found these guys… what really happened is he found them, but just like every other team in the NBA – they didn’t stick b/c the coaches didn’t give them the opportunity. that’s why Nellie has found these players before like in undrafted Marquis Daniels and Mully has not.
Minutes for J-Rich would’ve meant fewer minutes for Monta. 1) J-Rich’s presence wouldn’t have helped Baron’s minutes…
not necessarily. i’d say Baron and Jack would of lost minutes, possibly Al w/ a BD, ME, JR, SJ, AB line up. look at Baron’s minutes when we went on “the Run” http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/gamelog?playerId=194&year=2007 (two game of more than 40 minutes. at 42 & 43.) especially with Barnes and MP’s struggles shooting the ball last season, i find it hard to believe JRich (who shot great last year) wouldn’t of helped.
we’re talking about the last two years.
JRich for BW, JC for AH, Marcus Williams. Mully bid against himself for Maggette. He threw ridiculous contracts at Brand & Arenas which shows he didn’t learn as much as we thought he did when we saw him be frugal with Pietrus and Barnes – if not for Nelly, Pietrus might have a mid-level deal with the Warriors (Barnes never would have been).
my point is that Mully is a below average GM who hasn’t drafted well – especially since Higgins left. kind of a lesser version of Donnie Walsh (who is also good at getting rid of bad deals Zach/Craw and loves to acquire potential like when he piled up Bender, Tinsley, Harrington, Brezec, Fred Jones).
my main point is that, if it weren’t for Nellie making the most of BD and trying to look like a genius by giving guys like Barnes a chance, it’d be 15 years without the playoffs and fans wouldn’t be so pro-Mully.
either way, i’d say “good administrator” is a reach. Nellie made him look like a good administrator, but Nellie gets you from A to B, not B to C. Mully tried to get to C by dismantling B (a move i’d commend for say the Wizards, but we were on a 13 yr drought). it didn’t work – a good admin would of not panicked and continued to follow his vision and work towards C (his vision was obviously by rebuilding the team through ME, BW, AB), but Mully did the opposite – he tried to apply a patch and get back to B w/ moves for EB, GA, CM, JC and MW.
by the evil monkey on Jan 30, 2009 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Some good points. However, it seems to me that many of your biggest criticisms come from the last six months, when Mullin’s role has been fuzzy. I also think several of them are wrong-headed.
- Offering Arenas a max deal was ludicrously terrible… the worst move this franchise has made in years, and we’re hugely lucky that the guy didn’t bolt. However, that offer was made during the summer, at the point where Rowell was aready becoming more vocal in discussions (he nixed the Baron extension right at that time). Who’s to blame for that one? I don’t know… Mullin may well be partly responsible. But again, that move came at a time when he was already getting the keys taken away from him.
- Offering Elton Brand a max deal was, in truth, a pretty good idea. I know it’s fashionable to think that Brand sucks because the Sixers have played better without him (largely because their shooters have come alive), but the truth is, Brand would’ve really, really helped this team. Nellie-friendly? Maybe not. A solution to our power forward woes? Absolutely. As with Arenas, I don’t know who engineered this offer, but whoever it was, they did the right thing.
- According to Kawakami, Corey Maggette was overpaid to keep him from going to the Spurs. This was a joint decision by everyone. And frankly, I have trouble getting worked up over this one. Maggette is a good player… he’s probably been our best player this month. He hurts the overall defense, but he scores well enough to make that worth it. A slight overpay, but Corey. Maggette. Is. Not. The. Problem.
(On a similar note, the Turiaf signing and the extensions for Monta and Biedrins were handled quite well. This summer was by no means a disaster… it wasn’t nearly as damaging as the fall.)
- I, and many other people here, think that Jason Richardson for Brandan Wright was a fabulous trade. You don’t, and I’m not going to convince you otherwise. But at least recognize that there’s a genuine debate about the merits of that trade.
- The Harrington-Crawford trade was a NIGHTMARE. Mully has the relationship with Donnie Walsh, but as the story goes, this one was taken out of his hands. Larry Riley did the negotiating, Nellie made the final call.
- The Marcus Williams trade was an example of a GM and coach not being on the same page… Mullin deserves some criticism for that. But value-for-value, it was not a bad trade. The flip-side of Nellie’s ability to work with off-the-radar guys is his tendency to throw players in the dustbin. Regardless, this was not a franchise-changing move. It was a small move that didn’t pan out.
Here’s the point: the roster was pretty good, and getting better, with Mullin at the helm from 2006 through this spring. This summer, the balance in the front office shifted… at the same time, the team’s decision-making got SIGNIFICANTLY worse. We now have a much worse roster that’s being coached horribly (you often talk up your college experience — I’d REALLY like to hear you defend Nellie’s performance this season).
Mullin will be fired, and that’s not the end of the world. But this team’s direction has been worse since he got shunted aside, and considering the leaguewide contempt we’re garnering for the treatment of Mullin, I’m not convinced we’ll be able to find a great replacement.
I just think vilifying the one guy who’s been removed from the equation is bizarre. The last several moves — the Jack extension, the Crawford trade — are the ones that really killed us, and Mullin didn’t make them. The combo of Mullin and Nelson has been a good one for this team. Mully may not have been as good without Nellie, but the early returns of Nellie without Mully are pretty horrifying too.
by onlxn on Jan 30, 2009 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the roster was pretty good, and getting better, with Mullin at the helm from 2006 through this spring.
fair enough.
I actually come from the Bill Simmons opinion of Brand – combine that with him coming off a major injury and you can see why I thought the Brand deal was a mistake. anyway, agree to disagree here.
I, and many other people here, think that Jason Richardson for Brandan Wright was a fabulous trade. You don’t, and I’m not going to convince you otherwise. But at least recognize that there’s a genuine debate about the merits of that trade.
I actually don’t have much of a problem with this trade. I see why they did it. It makes sense if you’re going to rebuild (through Monta & AB). And this comes to my problem with Maggette’s signing as it’s a band-aid in place of stitches move. As soon as JRich was traded, it was clear what direction the team was headed. but instead of going young and piling up picks like the Blazers, OKC, Minny or Memphis, we follow the Kings model of trying to have one’s cake and eat it too.
from everything i’ve read, Marcus Williams sucked in NJ and was outplayed by that geezer Darrell Armstrong last season. Mully got snookered like Chris Wallace. TK is a bad source, but he’s a blatant Mully-lover and he said the JC deal was all Mullin.
* WINNER: Chris Mullin, who made this deal for Crawford, a player Mullin has always liked.
I hear that the Knicks first proposed Crawford-for-Harrington over a week ago, right as Robert Rowell was moving Larry Riley into the presumptive GM spot. That put the NY talks on hold, as Riley tried to make his own deal for Harrington. (Jerry Stackhouse’s name came up.)
But in the end, there was no better deal than the one Mullin and Knick honcho Donnie Walsh fashioned earlier in the month: Jamal Crawford. The deal Mullin made.
our roster got better under St Jean to. Yet most feel he sucked. i’m not villyfying Mullin. all i’m saying is Mully’s rep benefited greatly from Nellie. and that we shouldn’t paint this grand picture of Mully saving the franchise just b/c Nellie hasn’t worked out this season.
by the evil monkey on Jan 30, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
TK is a bad source, but he’s a blatant Mully-lover and he said the JC deal was all Mullin.
More recently, in his interview with Atma, TK painted a more complicated picture:
Complicated one—because I think Mullin is the one who got this deal onto the table. As he was shoved aside, Larry Riley tried to make a better deal, but after a week or so, the Warriors came back to the Crawford offer from New York. I think Nelson made the final ruling because he was clear he wanted a main rotation player in return for Harrington. He didn’t want cap relief.
So Mullin found the deal, but he’s not the one who pulled the trigger. Sounds like everyone has some blood on their hands on that one.
Anyway, I think we’re more or less on the same page. I agree on the Maggette signing — not bad value, but inconsistent with the rest of the plan. Boy, Baron opting out really threw this team for a loop.
Marcus Williams has not been a very good pro — it’s true, he did not play well in NJ. That trade’s a minus on Mully’s ledger. But he gave up either a low first-round pick or a couple second-round picks for a 22-year-old who’d recently been a low first-rounder himself, and whose struggles in his year were plausibly injury-related. Like the Maggette signing, the value-for-value’s not bad. It just didn’t fit this team.
Maybe we can agree on this: the combination of Mullin and Nelson was an extremely effective one for two years. Mullin looked awful before Nellie came along… Nellie’s not looking so hot now that others (including him) have monkeyed with the roster. My point isn’t that Mullin deserved all the credit for ‘06-’08… my point is just that things were working. Nellie played a big part in that, for sure, but so did Mullin. He assembled a talented young roster with flexibility, which is what every GM of a non-impact team should do. That doesn’t make him Jerry West, but he deserves some credit for it all the same.
by onlxn on Jan 30, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It makes sense if you’re going to rebuild
It makes more sense to enjoy the fruits of the existing re-building instead of aborting it as soon as you get to the playoffs! Jason was the heart of the rebuild that they killed. What makes you think the rebuild part 2 was a such good idea? We’re enjoying rebuild part 2 right now, fun isn’t it when the best thing about the season is we might get a high lottery pick? Any management that would destroy the playoff team after the mavericks win and close loss to utah deserves to be ridiculed over and over and over again.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 31, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Very interesting piece
I like the points you make.
by Number22Drew on Jan 29, 2009 4:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mullin is a non-issue
Don’t you think it is all relative? By that I mean Mullin made all kinds of learning curve mistakes; then he got better—arguably with the help of Nelson. But by 2006 and 2007 he had built a good team. I mean if you want to go just by results. Post Mullin’s infuence,beginning with Rowell’s taking over the Baron negotiations, radically diminished and that was the beginng of the end of his culpability of this “god-aweful” team under the Rowell era. Ultimately it makes no difference what we think of Mullin’s tenure, because it is long gone.
What kills me is that Nelson speaks after the Dallas game and says, well, this ass whopping has to be expected because we have a bad team. But that belies the reason it is such a bad team. Nelson doesn’t say I’ve coached like sh*t this year or Rowell has completely destroyed the team with his genuis moves and non-moves. Mullin is a non-issue and luckily for him, this disaster of a franchise can’t be laid at his feet.
CWebb is undoubtedly the answer but I forgot the question.
by commish on Jan 29, 2009 4:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
+1
can one of you gsom moderators delete this posting. next to the simple-minded trade proposals that get thrown up on this site regularly, this is the dumbest thing i’ve read. it’s clear atma has an axe to grind, we all get it. the record is old and broken. as commish says, “ultimately it makes no difference what we think of Mullin’s tenure, because it is long gone.” now if we can only get rid of all the trivial negativity atma keeps trying to push we’d be in business.
by fuller over bryant on Jan 29, 2009 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
see my reply to dubzfaninaz above
i dont think anyone is saying that mullin is solely to blame.
That being said, Mullin’s footprint is on the team and we will feel it for years. I get it, you want to cut ties since he’s got about as much power as you and me. But, you know what, he brought this on. He brought this on when he signed a bunch of horrible players, put us in situtations where we needed to “choose” between what players to keep, and never learned how to build a team in the long term. Sure he’s impotent now, but don’t forget that we’re in this position now partly because of him. I don’t see why you’re defending him.
"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."
by GameSix on Jan 30, 2009 7:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not going to disagree, but......
now you should do one about Rowell, and it will be fair. He was, afterall, in charge of Mullin. I think that you are giving Mullin too much credit and/or blame. Still, you bring up a lot of great points so i will just say What About *Bob**?*
Rowell is the dirtiest suit in that house.
Scrub the scrub.
by Nuck Chorris on Jan 29, 2009 5:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The thing is
EVERYONE knows Rowell’s incompetent. Even worse, unlike Mullin he doesn’t come across like a nice guy and I haven’t seen or met a single person who claimed he was.
No one’s saying Rowell’s a “good administrator”. He’s universally regarded as a big reason for the suck and arguably THE person to blame for letting Baron Davis go, which next to the moped is the single biggest reason this team dropped from a flawed, but entertaining 48 win squad to the current disaster. Rowell didn’t win Tim Kawakami’s 2008 Talking Points Hitman of the Year for nothing.
This piece fills a void which both the local and mainstream media have missed entirely- much of the current mess can be traced to Mullin’s silly personel moves (it should be noted all Rowell approved- don’t forget he signed off on those silly Foyle, Fisher, Dunleavy, Murphy extensions), yet people want to act like his hands are clean. Just because Mullin’s supposedly lost power behind the scenes, doesn’t mean this team isn’t suffering right now and won’t suffer in the future because of his moves. When the Warriors surrender that future draft pick for Marcus Williams- it’s not Nellie or Larry Riley’s fault.
I’m happy to do a piece on Rowell though- actually make that unhappy!
by Atma Brother ONE on Jan 29, 2009 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I met a season ticket holder at the Clips game.
He told me that Rowell took down his name and number in order to get back to him about some questions, and Rowell just snubbed the guy. Season ticket holder’s name was Jeff.
by Nuck Chorris on Jan 29, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
.
Look, I like Mullin. Great player. Every time I’ve seen him in person, he’s been a really nice guy and by all reports I’ve heard and read that that’s not just my imagination. But I really don’t understand what he’s “going through”. If it’s so bad (which I doubt it is) he can resign or quit.
The way the team has treated him is unprofessional and unbecoming of a pro franchise, in a very similar fashion to many of the ownership power pulls and shady doings that have tarnished the team for years. I’ve read anonymously sourced GMs in a couple articles marvel at Mullin’s treatment. He’s being stripped of the lion’s share of management control covertly by ownership. His assistant was removed and replaced by Larry Riley (presumably against Mullin’s wishes). He has, for whatever free agent follies he’s had, been one of the few administrators the team has employed who consistently, clearly cares about improving the state of the franchise.
I don’t believe Cohan or Rowell care about where the team is so long as tickets are sold. I don’t think Don Nelson cares where the team is after he’s gone, or even how successful they are now as long as the cigar money keeps rolling in. From a moral standpoint, I don’t feel good watching the only man in the organization who I think has a legitimate affection for our franchise get shanked by a scurrilous ownership group, with at least the tacit approval of the very coach he hired.
Whether you approve of the job Mullin’s done as GM or not, it’s imperative that people recognize the shameful way he as a professional basketball administrator is being treated in his vocation, if not because you like Mullin’s basketball mind, then at least because it’s indicative of the scum we have sitting in the throne.
by Zack Vank on Jan 29, 2009 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Still not seeing it
He’s being stripped of the lion’s share of management control covertly by ownership.
To Rowell’s defense (which I hate to do) if my basketball advisor, told me that signing Fisher, Foyle, Dunleavy, and Murphy to those deals was a good idea, I’d be a little hesitant to listen to him during the next contract negotiations- see Davis, Baron.
So what if Mullin’s being stripped of his management control- we’re not talking about R.C. Buford here. I can see how Cohan and Rowell are hesitant to take his advice and have identified Nellie as the reason for this team’s recent success after those blown draft picks, terrible contract negotiations, and lack of seriousness in dealing with Mopedgate.
His assistant was removed and replaced by Larry Riley (presumably against Mullin’s wishes).
If you can break down Pete D’Alessandro’s work with the Warriors- plusses and minuses- and prove that he didn’t deserve to get canned, then I’ll happily change my stance. Otherwise, there’s nothing immoral about that- it’s just blindly picking sides.
He has, for whatever free agent follies he’s had, been one of the few administrators the team has employed who consistently, clearly cares about improving the state of the franchise.
Good for him- although I don’t know how you can prove that he doesn’t care about his paychecks just like everyone else.
I don’t believe Cohan or Rowell care about where the team is so long as tickets are sold.
100% Agreed.
I don’t think Don Nelson cares where the team is after he’s gone, or even how successful they are now as long as the cigar money keeps rolling in.
Pure conjecture.
If anything Nellie wants to win NOW and after being a fan of this franchise for over 15 years- I’m down for that. It’s obvious from Mullin “get younger or get die trying” personnel moves, he’d rather win later than now.
From a moral standpoint, I don’t feel good watching the only man in the organization who I think has a legitimate affection for our franchise get shanked by a scurrilous ownership group, with at least the tacit approval of the very coach he hired.
Again it’s a business. It doesn’t have anything to do with morality (unless I’m missing some facts). Mullin lied to J-Rich who gave his all for this franchise when he traded him. Mullin thought the team would be better off with that trade. It wasn’t personal. I don’t agree with the move and I’m not a fan of Mullin for pulling that weak move (straight up lying to someone who risked future damage to his knee to help this franchise), but hey I can understand that Mullin has to make trades and it’s not always going to be pretty.
Same thing with Nellie (if he’s angling to get rid of Mullin- which there has been ZERO proof of, yet that’s the hot, entertaining rumor of the day) and Rowell. They seem to genuinely believe the team is better off without him and with Larry Riley as a GM. Given that Mullin’s hiring was a publicity stunt in the first place and all the silly moves he’s made, I’d have to agree. It’s a business. Nothing personal.
by Atma Brother ONE on Jan 29, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The conjecture...
…argument works both ways.
Given that Mullin’s hiring was a publicity stunt in the first place…
That’s entirely conjecture, unless you’ve managed to get a source in the Warriors front office to say that to be the case. You’ve come to that conclusion because Mullin was a star for our team and a popular guy, but one doesn’t by rule follow the other. I’m not arguing that his profile didn’t play a role in his hiring, because I think that would require me to ignore the impressions and instincts about Warriors management that I’ve developed over time.
Similarly, I don’t believe that Nelson cares about winning now or in the future not because of a snap emotional reaction to the man’s disinterested mojo (although I certainly do stand in awe of said mojo). Nelson’s committment to the four-guard lineups this year is a statistically failed strategy that implies a logical flaw.
If Nelson is playing these lineups because he thinks they’re the best way to win, then he’s flat wrong. He hasn’t had as many options on the frontline since Wright’s injury, but he had Brandan ready to roll for the early part of the season and didn’t give him the time, despite the fact that most every reasoned statistical analysis I’ve seen suggests that we would have had a better (even if not good) chance to win playing with a taller frontcourt. If he’s playing the four-guard lineup while knowing the statistically lower probability that we’d win that way, then he’s not playing to win now, he’s playing to prolong his legacy as a small-ball maverick.
The fact that the players who would benefit the most from extended burn (Wright and Randolph) also happen to be frontcourt non-guards makes the decisions instantly more frustrating, but at its core I’d say it represents a coaching philosophy which has now run bankrupt (not unlike my checking account).
As for the argument of my moral empathies not being relevant in terms of a business, I had always assumed that your philosophies ran contradictory to that, so that point is duly noted. It’s worth noting that I don’t like the fact that Richardson was essentially lied to about not being traded, and I’d consider that a knock against Mullin, although in the context of an attempt to land Kevin Garnett the potential benefit torches the loss. In this situation, keeping Mullin on in this awkward state of limbo is turning our team into one of the most prominent emblems of front office disarray and unprofessionalism. With Cohan and Rowell in charge, this assessment would almost always be dead on, but there’s something to be said for always hoping things will get better. An optimistic spirit.
by Zack Vank on Jan 30, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah
It is still a “GREAT TIME OUT!”
by Nuck Chorris on Jan 29, 2009 5:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Garbage analysis... as usual
Sad thing is that u actually feel justified in wasting ur time writing this crap…
"To be a great champion you must believe you are the best. If you're not, pretend you are." - Muhammad Ali
by Dubs Wise on Jan 29, 2009 5:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We are a ridiculous fan base...
win one big one, everyone is happy and hopeful, loose one big one, everyone turns doom and gloom. Anger. Rage. WARRIORS!!!!!!!!
by FishStix on Jan 29, 2009 5:34 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
+1
Warriors fans are hysterical.
by Nuck Chorris on Jan 29, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The biggest problem is us...
This has been said before but I’ll say it again. Owners like Chris Cohen are only in it for the money. It’s strictly business to people like them. They’re going to do what it takes to make the dollar and do it for as cheap as possible. . I’m still disgusted over picking up Maggette but I think we did that only to avoid making the Clippers a potential power-house team more so than trying to get actual value for our dollars. Anyway, the only real solution is to stop going to the games, stop buying things that will help fill Cohen’s pockets. Unfortunately, I’m a Warriors fan and don’t intend to do that but for those who complain so vehemently about the poor management and poor decision making, stop supporting the team. It’s the only way to see any change and even then, it won’t be guaranteed. Think about it this way, if you owned a company (Warriors) and you were selling a product (the players) that constantly was getting sold out (the tickets), would you make any changes to your product? You wouldn’t, it’ll be a poor business decision to fix something that’s not broken and in the eyes of Cohen, the same amount of dollars are rolling in year after year so to him, it ain’t broken. If ticket sales declined dramatically causing overall revenue to decrease, then in order to stay profitable, they would have to spend the necessary dollars improving the product. It’s a drastic measure but unless something like that is done, we’re continue to be victim of our own loyalty to the team.
by blkdiemend on Jan 29, 2009 5:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Has he done a great job?
Hell no., but he hasn’t screwed the franchise for years on end like every other person in charge has in the last 15 years. Fact: The Warriors had their two most successful seasons over the last 14 years under Mullin. You can talk about stupid moves and maybe it was Nelly who turned it around, but Mullin shaped those teams. I mean we are HALF A YEAR removed from a 48 win season. The reason Mullin doesn’t get bashed by the media like you say he should is because his teams have had some success, which is more than a lot of GM’s in this league can say. He’s gone anyway so it really doesn’t matter, but success does a funny thing to critics, even when it is short lived.
Playoffs!!??
by PAWarrior on Jan 29, 2009 5:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mullin is no Jerry West… he’s been a mixed bag. But his last two years have been very, very strong, and overall, I think he’s been a bit more good than bad. Let’s go through Atma’s criticisms.
So good that during his 5 year tenure with the Dubs, the rosters he’s assembled have made the playoffs once?
This is true. Of course, last year’s team would’ve made it in in literally every other year of the 16-seed playoff structure. On the other hand, the “We Believe” team would not have made it some years.
The team’s record since Mullin took over is 172-202, for a .460 winning percentage. Not terrible, and certainly leaps and bounds better than anyone else in the last long while, but certainly not good.
Pre-Nellie Mullin was absolutely clueless and way in over his head.
I would agree with this, but so would JVG, correct? The question is how good Mullin is at his job now. If you think he should be fired solely for the sins of 2005, fair enough, but I think most people would agree that his recent good work is more relevant than his more distant poor work.
All of the moves that are supposedly his alone
This is a dangerous way of looking at things, and lends itself towards bias. Any Mully/Nellie/Rowell/Cohan/whoever hater can point to the weakest moves the franchise has made lately and blame their personal villain for them. Mullin has been a part of a number of big mistakes. He’s also been a part of a number of good moves. To blame him for the bad ones and give him no credit for the good ones is silly.
the Marcus Williams trade
You certainly can’t say this one has worked out. On the other hand, the price for this, realistically, was pretty small… I don’t think it was an excessive price for a guy of MWill’s potential. Was certainly bad to add a guy your coach would refuse to play. Both Mullin and Nellie deserve a knock for that, I think.
drafting Marco Belinelli and believing he was a good replacement for Jason Richardson
Okay, two separate issues here: drafting Marco and trading J-Rich. Marco first. Like you, I was one of the bigger Marco haters on this site through the fall. It turns out that you and I were wrong, and that Mullin was right: Marco was a solid pick. I’m not saying that he’ll be a star, because he won’t. I’m not even saying I think he’ll ever be a viable NBA starter. But Marco is a genuine rotation player with upside, and that is decent value for the 18th pick of a draft.
As for Marco replacing Jason Richardson, that was never the plan. Monta Ellis replaced Jason Richardson, with help from Stephen Jackson and Kelenna Azubuike. And guess what? They did a damn fine job of it. Of all the many problems plaguing this team, depth at the wings is certainly not one of them.
(This seems like a good time to mention: the Suns haven’t played any better since adding J-Rich, and the Bobcats have played better since losing him. That’s the second straight time he’s changed teams without making a dent. If this guy is a proven winner, he sure does a good job of hiding it.)
keeping Brandan Wright
This is a curious criticism. You blame Mullin for not… trading BWright? For not waiving him? Brandan Wright has some flaws, but he is a good, productive young player. I know you didn’t like the J-Rich trade, but how the hell is Brandan Wright, in and of himself, a bad thing?
inking 2nd round bust Kosta Perovic to a 2 year $3.5 million deal with a 3rd year team option (most likely the most foolishly lucrative 2nd round signing of all time)
A foolish move, that looked even more foolish because Nellie came along shortly after… under Montgomery, Perovic probably at least would’ve played a little. Still and all, though, this cost us $3 million (above league minimums) over two years. It’s nothing to get too worked up over.
Inking Derek Fisher, Adonal Foyle, Mike Dunleavy, and Troy Murphy to those silly deals
Absolutely. All terrible, terrible moves.
blowing all those draft picks (Ike Diogu and Patrick O’Bryant isn’t exactly great like Jamison’s back-to-back 51’s)
I’d give the POB pick an F, and the Diogu pick maybe a D… Diogu was at least a commodity that other teams still valued after the fact, to the point where he made the Dunmurphy trade happen. These were extremely bad picks.
On the other hand, Biedrins was a brilliant pick. Monta was a great pick. Wright was a good pick, Marco was a decent pick. Mullin’s also found several good commodities outside the draft (more on that later).
Mullin’s draft history is not great. It is also not terrible. It is reason neither to give him a raise nor to fire him. You can yell “POB and Diogu” at the top of your lungs… someone else might yell “Beans and Monta” right back at you. Mullin’s drafts have not been terrible.
trading away Jason Richardson to get even younger, softer, and more inexperienced
This has beem covered ad nauseam. I happen to think this was one of Mullin’s very best moves. We shan’t agree here.
failing to use multiple large trade exceptions
I have trouble getting worked up about this. Ownership plays a big role in decisions like these.
signing Austin Croshere and Troy Hudson
Croshere was a fine signing, Hudson was a poor one… neither one cost us at all. You’re really straining to make a point if you include these two. Yes, our worst players sometimes aren’t very good.
Let’s not forget Mullin’s complete inability over his 4.5 year VP/GM tenure with the Warriors to find a good starting power forward who can rebound and score at a high percentage.
Players like that are among the most valuable players in the league… you’re only going to get them if you sign them to huge contracts (Mullin has tried), trade the farm for them (Mullin has tried, and by many accounts made the best KG offer), or to have a top-three pick (Mullin hasn’t had any). Yes, occasionally guys like David Lee and Paul Millsap arise out of nowhere. But every GM in the league passed on each of those guys… most passed on Millsap twice. I don’t see why Mullin should get any special scorn for missing those guys.
It sucks that we don’t have a good power forward. Maybe a better GM could’ve gotten us one in the last four years. I kind of doubt it.
Foyle’s still on the books this year for $6.8 million— would’ve been a great expiring contract, but oh well.
Several variables here, including money, and the fact that the franchise and Foyle had a good relationship. He wanted to play basketball… Nellie wasn’t going to let him, and Cohan didn’t want to pay a guy who wouldn’t play. Mully cut him loose. I have no beef with any of that.
And since when does an NBA GM get props for buying out contracts from the likes of Kosta Perovic and Sarunas Jasikevicius?
Since never… literally nobody has ever suggested that he should get props for those. Total strawman here.
Yes, he did indeed manage to dump those silly gift contracts to Dunleavy and Murphy to Larry Bird and the Pacers,
Yes, he did, and for pretty amazing value, to boot. I give credit to Cohan and Rowell here, as well — not every ownership group would’ve been willing to dance with Jack in ‘07. But this is a huge credit in Mullin’s favor, and you really shouldn’t just skip past it.
but what’s the point when about 1.5 years later you’re going to overspend it on Corey Maggette?
Corey Maggette makes far, far less than Dunleavy and Murphy do. Corey Maggette is also a pretty good player, as he’s shown whenever Nellie has used him sanely. Did Mullin (or whoever) overpay for him? A little, yeah. But that is certainly NOT what’s wrong with the franchise.
During the telecast Van Gundy was praising Mullin for his scouting and all the D-League finds on the Warriors roster. Well let’s be fair. None of these guys are top 50 or even top 100 (maybe even 150) players in the NBA.
I’d think ‘Buike slots somewhere between 100 and 150, and Morrow’s not far behind him. But more to the point, so what? Mullin has gotten value from the D-League. Finding ‘Buike, Watson and Morrow is like stumbling into three mid-first-round draft picks out of nowhere. That’s a stellar thing to happen to a team.
In the last three years, Chris Mullin has gotten more value out of the D-League than any GM in basketball. That is a huge, good, important thing. You couldn’t possibly try to spin that into being a bad thing, could you?
Mullin’s had to “find” so many NBDL players to populate this roster precisely because he’s lost on so many other moves as the VP/ GM of this team.
HA! Good effort. One of the only good things about this roster is its depth… we have, without exaggerating one inch, ten guys who are good enough to be in an NBA rotation. Many of them aren’t good enough to be high in a rotation, and they’re all too similar to each other… but they can play. And that’s a good thing.
Look, I like Mullin. Great player. Every time I’ve seen him in person, he’s been a really nice guy and by all reports I’ve heard and read that that’s not just my imagination. But I really don’t understand what he’s “going through”. If it’s so bad (which I doubt it is) he can resign or quit.
I agree with all of this. I’ll shed no tears for Mully… he’s free to leave if he wants to.
Do think you really think Van Gundy would be happy about having to coach the worst defensive backcourt in the league featuring Monta Ellis (hasn’t even tried on D since his second year in the league), Jamal Crawford (the next time he’s in the right position on D will be his first in a Warriors uni), CJ Watson (let’s just say he didn’t get called up from the NBDL for his D), Kelenna Azubuike (maybe the easiest big minute player in the league to beat off the dribble), and Marco Belinelli (soft). At the wings there’s Corey Maggette (would play D if it would get him to the free throw line) and Stephen Jackson (half the time he doesn’t get back on D because he’s complaining about some non-call). Up front there’s Andris Biedrins (can’t guard a single 4 or 5 in the league mano y mano and routinely surrenders career nights to opposing big men), Brandan Wright (it looks like he’s playing zone when the rest of the team is playing man and playing man when the rest of the team is playing zone), and Anthony Randolph (just isn’t physically ready to play D in the NBA). The best defender on this team Ronny Turiaf thinks good D = blocking shots and nothing else.
Yeah, the defensive production on this team is staggeringly low. But don’t you think that’s largely a coaching issue?
Jamal Crawford and Corey Maggette… yeah, those guys aren’t going to defend (which is part of the reason the Crawford trade was so insane). But why aren’t Monta Ellis, Brandan Wright, CJ Watson and Kelenna Azubuike good defenders? These are young, eager guys… two of them were known for their defense going into their drafts, and two had to claw their way up from the D-League. Why do they get beat so badly? Why do they struggle to defend basic offensive sequences? Why do they seem to be getting worse defensively, when young players usually improve quickly? Might it have something to do with our legendary coach?
Now I don’t doubt for a second that Van Gundy could have this current Warriors team playing better D than Nellie.
But it’d be at the cost of plenty of offense
This strikes me as a false choice. Mike D’Antoni’s teams play dramatically better defense than Nellie’s… he has the pitifully untalented Knicks doing a good bit better than us, both defensively and overall. It’s not that Nellie’s offense requires bad defense… it’s that it usually works well enough so that Nellie doesn’t have to bother to teach defense. Without Baron and an on-form Monta, our offense can’t possibly cover for our defense. Nellie needs to teach these kids. And he isn’t.
and I doubt it would make that much of a difference in the win column (if any).
I’m guessing we’d be doing a good bit better under Van Gundy, and especially under D’Antoni (I’d have LOVED to see what D-Antoni would do with this weird-ass roster). Nellie has dragged this team down…
Nellie’s a phenomenal offensive coach. Coaching ain’t the problem here.
…oh.
Seriously, have you been watching the games? We’re not even very good at offense. There’s no semblance of a plan out there.
It’s the ZERO All-Star roster that’s way too young (i.e. not ready) for the NBA.
Youth doesn’t have much to do with it. Size and coaching are our issues. And Mullin deserves some blame for those issues.
But Nellie drove our starting power forward away, then refused to play his consistently productive replacement. Nellie has repeatedly played Corey Maggette at the four, despite all the evidence and logic in the world. Nellie has literally — LITERALLY — given up on trying to teach his youngsters defense.
We’re playing five million bucks for this?
Someone’s got to be the good guy (“poor Mullin the good administrator”, “poor rookie Anthony Randolph who can’t get any playing time”- by the way AR’s already played more minutes than Andris Biedrins, Brandan Wright, Marco Belinelli, and even Ronny Turiaf did during their rookie seasons)
I agree that things get oversimplified. And I personally have no beef with Nellie’s handling of Randolph. That’s one of the only things I think he’s done right.
and someone’s got to be the bad guy (all the Nellie-haters who can’t name a single coach who could coach this terrible and banged up roster to a significantly better record).
I could name a bunch of coaches that I think would — two have already come up — but what’s the point? You’d think they couldn’t. Hiding behind hypotheticals is FUN…
Nellie’s been a big asset the last two years, and I think the big man’s heart is in the right place. And there’s plenty of blame to go around for this season, and Mullin deserves some of it too.
But we have a young, talented roster that’s playing without any clue and without any fire, and in combinations that defy all logic. We’re missing a power forward, sure, but that alone doesn’t make you 14-32. Terrible coaching does.
by onlxn on Jan 29, 2009 6:17 PM PST reply actions 11 recs
Now that's a comment! (Rec'ed)
Onixn- Obviously you and I disagree on a lot of points here, but we do agree on many others as you’ve enumerated above. Nice work and tons of great counter-points. There’s two sides to most stories as your thoughts above illuminate.
I guess the one biggest contention I have with your analysis is Mullin’s drafting. I’ll save everyone the boredom and just drop this link: Grading the Mullin Picks
We could be looking at a lineup featuring:
- Al Jefferson or Josh Smith or Kevin Martin
- Danny Granger (just announced as an All-Star) or Andrew Bynum or David Lee
- Andray Blatche
- Rajon Rondo
- Paul Milsap
- Al Thornton
- Marc Gasol
It’d be nice to have some of those players instead of filling this roster up with D-Leaguers.
Now every GM passes on good players and mistakes in the drafts, but passing on ALL of those players? That’s setting this franchise up for failure for years to come or at least a much more difficult path towards success.
by Atma Brother ONE on Jan 29, 2009 6:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it’s fun going back and forth with you, Atma. I disagree with a lot of your stuff, but I appreciate the energy you’ve been putting in lately.
As for the drafting… again, I’d give Mullin a B-minus at best, and could be convinced to go a little lower. But I don’t think a laundry list of every good player that went late proves a guy can’t draft. There are always good guys who go late, guys who come out of nowhere.
Let’s go through the guys you’ve listed.
- Jefferson, Smith and Martin went a couple picks after Biedrins; Jefferson and Smith were both projects like Beans, while Martin was a small-school guy.
I’d take Jefferson over Beans, but not by much. Beans, while not a great defender, is much better than Jefferson; Jefferson is a wretched, wretched defender. I would absolutely take Biedrins over Josh Smith, and not think twice about it. Biedrins vs. Martin… I’m certainly not heartbroken about having Beans. We needed a guy like Beans more at the time, and we still do.
The only criticism of Mullin you can make in that draft is that someone else’s project big man turned out slightly, slightly better. Mullin had the eleventh pick and got, at worst, the fifth-best player of the whole thing. I just can’t quibble with that.
- Diogu over Bynum is obviously ridiculous, but we already had our project big… I don’t begrudge Mullin for not adding another. And David Lee just flat-out surprised people… there’s a reason he fell to #30. But Danny Granger hurt. I think Granger is the biggest whiff that Mullin’s made, frankly. We’d scouted him, we knew he was good, and we just left him drift on by (as did seven more teams, to be fair). Missing on Granger is a fair criticism of Mullin.
- The 2006 draft was a weak one, and I don’t think Mullin was an idiot for missing on a weird project of a guy like Rondo. Really, the mistake in 2006 wasn’t failing to get a superstar… it was failing to get anybody. You ought to at least be able to get twenty minutes a game out of your ninth pick at some point; at worst, it should add to your team’s depth, in a Ronnie Brewer/Renaldo Balkman sorta way. Mullin blew the 2006 draft by not landing a rotation guy, but he didn’t exactly pass up any Lebrons, either.
- Brandan Wright over Al Thornton? I won’t lose any sleep over that one. Thornton can have big nights, but he’s not good on D and not efficient on offense… he’s like a raw Jamal Crawford, and one of those is plenty. I think Wright is the better player, and as a power forward, he’s a type of player that we needed, and need, more. Rodney Stuckey is the real gem from that draft, but it’s not like we had a need at the point in ’07.
- Finally, Blatche, Millsap and Gasol were second-rounders, meaning literally everybody in the league passed them up at least once. It’s true that Mullin passed them up, but I don’t think it’s reasonable to hold it against him. Guys will develop out of the second round and surprise everybody. And Mullin snagged Monta out of the second round, so his drafting record down low compares favorably with most people’s.
Here’s another, glass-half-full way to look at Mullin’s talent acquisitions. These are the picks Mullin’s had to work with.
11th overall (2004)
9th, 40th & 42nd overall (2005)
9th & 38th overall (2006)
8th, 18th & 46th overall (2007)
14th & 49 overall (2008)
And these are the young guys on the roster that Mullin’s added at rookie salaries or lower: Andris Biedrins, Monta Ellis, Brandan Wright, Kelenna Azubuike, Anthony Randolph, Anthony Morrow, Marco Belinelli, CJ Watson.
Let’s say you slot those guys into those picks, roughly by talent. What does it look like?
- Andris Biedrins (11th), 2004
- Monta Ellis (9th), 2005
- Kelenna Azubuike (9th), 2006
- Brandan Wright (8th), Marco Belinelli (18th), CJ Watson (46th), 2007
- Anthony Randolph (14th), Anthony Morrow (49th), 2008
Not nearly as bad, right? Nobody looks like a bad pick here. ‘Buike at 9th might look a tad high, but remember, that was a terrible draft… there aren’t ten draftees from that year who are better than him. You arrange things this way, and Mullin looks pretty damn good.
I’m not saying this is the right way to look at it. I’m not saying Diogu and POB didn’t happen, because God help us, they did.
But despite his mistakes, Mullin has brought a lot of good young talent onto the club, this despite always picking eighth or lower in increasingly shallow drafts. Overall, I’d say player acquisitions has been a strength of his, not a weakness.
by onlxn on Jan 29, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
why?
Onlxn- lots of word, but bottom line it seems to me that you agree with Atma’s sentiment that Mullin is not a great administrator, and could go either way. Why such an impassioned, verbose defense of someone who…really hasn’t earned it?
Atma: Look, I like Mullin. Great player. Every time I’ve seen him in person, he’s been a really nice guy and by all reports I’ve heard and read that that’s not just my imagination. But I really don’t understand what he’s "going through". If it’s so bad (which I doubt it is) he can resign or quit.
onlxn; I agree with all of this. I’ll shed no tears for Mully… he’s free to leave if he wants to.
So…then…why the love for Mullin? At the end of the day, I’m supposed to beliveve that Mullin has learned on the job and will do great things if given a chance…even though, his first attempt at doing so put together a shiite team? Not gonna happen.
I wouldn’t hire him. Chances are, he’ll go to the Knicks (blah blah st johns reunion), sign Lebron, win titles…and the Warriors will be, yet again, laughed at by the Association.
"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."
by GameSix on Jan 30, 2009 8:44 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Onlxn- lots of word, but bottom line it seems to me that you agree with Atma’s sentiment that Mullin is not a great administrator, and could go either way. Why such an impassioned, verbose defense of someone who…really hasn’t earned it?
Because I happen to think that Mullin’s work from the fall of 2006 to last summer was EXTREMELY strong. Management dramatically upgraded our roster AND our cap situation in less than two years, which is a hard trick. Now I don’t know exactly who was responsible for what in there, but I do know that as Mullin’s influence has waned, the front office decision-making has gotten much, much worse.
It just seems to me that Mullin is a pretty bizarre scapegoat for the current state of things. Cohan, Rowell, Nellie, Monta and even Al all deserve more blame than Mullin. Mullin put together a solid roster, a 48-win roster with flexibility and upside. What, that’s happened since, is his fault?
I mean, I don’t like the finger-pointing game, but let’s look at this. Rowell nixed the Baron extension (which might’ve even been wise, but certainly hurt us this season). The Nellie/Al issue is the fault of those two guys; Monta’s injury is all Monta. Trading Al for Crawford — Mully was apparently somewhat involved, but he didn’t pull the trigger on it. The idiotic Jack extension was all Rowell. The Maggette signing? Mully was supposedly involved in that, but guess what — that signing was fine. Maggette’s been scorching hot lately… bad defense and all, he’s been an asset. Corey Maggette is by no means the reason we’re struggling.
So…then…why the love for Mullin? At the end of the day, I’m supposed to beliveve that Mullin has learned on the job and will do great things if given a chance…even though, his first attempt at doing so put together a shiite team?
If you’re referring to the ‘05-’06 teams, you’re right… his first attempt was terrible. If you’re talking about the current team, you’re absolutely insane.
Mullin’s handiwork wrought a 48-win team last year that had genuinely promising young players at every position, and — get this — $18 million in contracts set to expire in the summer of 2010. We didn’t have a young All-Star (most teams that don’t get top-three picks don’t), but we had an already-solid team whose future looked bright, and a real chance at trading for a stud. Six months ago, there weren’t ten teams in the league with brighter futures than ours.
What’s happened since? Baron left, Monta and others have gotten hurt, our best excuse for a power forward got miffed and got traded for negative value, Jack got extended for no reason and the team has shown zero interest in defense or preparation. And the culprit for all that is the GM who got his power taken away just before all this happened?
There’s an additional variable here, one that’s revealed by the comments of folks like Van Gundy and Barkley: people around the league like Mullin, and associate him with this franchise. We have a legendary ex-Warrior manning the helm for us… that’s a nice story. It’s cynical PR, sure, but a borderline, mid-market team like us can use some positive PR when it comes to courting free agents and front office people, and since Mully had been doing an excellent job lately anyway, so much the better.
This franchise’s reputation, never great to begin with, will take perhaps its worst hit ever as a result of crapping on Mully. This isn’t like crapping on Dave Twardzik or Garry St. Jean. This is crapping on what most NBA people consider to be the face of the franchise.
I’m not saying that wouldn’t be worth it under some circumstances. You don’t keep a bad GM around for good press.
But Mullin has been a good GM for the last couple years, even a very good one, who also brings you good press. Since he was marginalized, our decision-making got worse, our team got worse, and our rep got worse. How on earth are we supposed to convince any talented GM candidates to come here, if that’s what happens to a local legend?
Look, I think Mullin’s made some real mistakes. And I by no means buy Kawakami’s goofy, pro-Mullin take on everything under the sun. But of the key players in the Warriors franchise over the last couple years, the one that’s least responsible for the current mess is Mullin. Under his watch, we became good… since he was marginalized, we got bad again.
by onlxn on Jan 30, 2009 9:55 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
hmm
Thanks for the detailed response. I sort of see where you’re coming from. But I will have to disagree w/you on your saving grace, 06-07 and 07-08.
I totally opposed keeping Baron around because he wanted way more cash and years then he would earn. Rowell made the right decision in not extending him. You dont build a team around Baron Davis, because he quits and he is unreliable. He proved that. You seem to agree…
Once it becomes apparent that your “all-star” is really an “all-super-good-not-quite-all-star”…the whole thiing kind of falls apart. The team was built to compete in seasons 06 and 08, but after that it was clear the team had no real shot of staying together or being competitive. Baron got more money elsewhere, but I’m glad he wasn’t kept around. I loved him and I will give him a standing ovation when I see him. But, w/Baron I think its best to cut our losses.
After that, how good of a team could you really have when your foundation was as shaky as BD? When you rely on Al Harrington to be your center…….you can’t with a straight face tell me that we had the makings of something special after 07-08. It was clearly time to cut ties and start all over.
And like I said already…I am not discounting the other people involved. This was about Mullin as an administrator. And I remained unconvinced that he has not a good job. But hey I get what you’re saying. let’s call the whole thing off
Oh yeah, one more thing…I wonder if by extending sjax, a player favorite around the league…maybe that is the front office’s team-reputation face saving move? I wonder if sjax, over the life of his contract, will be worth more to the team than Baron Davis. Interesting question. Right now SJax has the early lead, by virtue of …existing…
"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."
by GameSix on Jan 30, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The damage...
…to our rep around the league with this Mullin thing is one of the biggest and least predictable calamities we may yet face.
by Zack Vank on Jan 30, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
andre blashe? no thanks
marco gasol? we got dre.
kevin martin? well yea..but we got monta!
by gswfan1 on Jan 29, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Turiaf's rookie season
He missed almost 2/3 of the year because of open heart surgery, so you can’t really include him in that group (Andris, BWright, Rocky) because they were all healthy.
Anthony Morrow's jumper is so pure, he has to cut it with baking soda.
by dindin on Jan 29, 2009 7:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
I want to make sweet, sweet love to this post. As blog posts go, about as triumphant, thorough, and satisfying as BD’s dunk in AK-47’s grill. I think I may need a cold shower.
onlxn: I guess I can officially hang up my cleats as AB1’s (wannabe) nemesis, since you laid it all out so much more thoughtfully, eloquently, and coolly, than I ever could. Ah well … Atma and I have been weirdly simpatico lately, so your timing is good… ;-)
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 29, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
ps
Can we get another rec color above and beyond garden-variety green for posts like this? Gold? Chartreuse? Magenta? Mauve?
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 29, 2009 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we have a young, talented roster that’s playing without any clue and without any fire,
All those words to get to this….. Pardon me but a talented roster plays WITH a clue and WITH fire , review the “talented” part and try again.
If the team sucks we need changes, top to bottom, the only guy who’s immune is the guy paying the bills, it’s his dime. A good housecleaning would work wonders for our players attitude and for our own sense of managerial incompetence.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 29, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Excellent point and counterpoint
but I think I’d have to lean more towards the Atma side of the argument. Most of the year, I felt that we weren’t playing to potential, but after trying to win with this team on NBA 2K9 and having won only one game on a Monta buzzer-beater, I can realize that this team has no All-Stars. It’s got 3 guys (Ellis, Jackson, and Biedrins) who are just a step being beyond a role player, and then a bunch of role players. Sure, we’ve got 10 little pieces of candy, but teams that have 3 big pieces of candy can easily beat us. Yeah, I know referencing a video game is weak, but I still think that Mullin has run this team into the ground.
Okay, here’s another bad example that would only come from me. Where would you rather be right now, disreguarding any sort of “baggage” that goes with these teams….with the Warriors or with the Thunder? The Warriors are sitting on an aging Jackson, an injury-prone Ellis who relys exclusively on quickness, and lots of guards who might as well be carbon copies of each other. All of the major contracts aren’t expiring, and it looks like we’re gonna be stuck in this sinking boat for the next 2 or 3 years. On the Thunder side of things, they rebuilt a team that revolved around Ray Allen into a team that revolves around 3 young stars (Durant, Green, and Westbrook). Sure, there is a whole lot of old crap on the roster, but most of it is expiring. Say what you want, but the Thunder are playing .500 ball right now and have an extremely bright future. The Warriors are playing sub .500 ball right now and have a pretty bleak future. Now, I’m not trying to exalt Sam Presti or anything, I’m just citing an example of a team that’s done a better job of managing it’s players. And it’s the best example I know.
Bottom line, Chris Mullin has refused to properly rebuild because he constantly thinks that he can win and that he has to win because there’s huge pressure from the culture around the team because we’ve been constantly losing. We’ve doomed ourselves to constant mediocrity.
I’ve rambled long enough. I’ll leave you with this thought:
WE NEED DEFENSE!!!!
YOU KNOW WHO HAS DEFENSE?!?!?!
ADONAL FOYLE!!!! THAT’S RIGHT!
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://www.blueblitz.net
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Jan 30, 2009 7:21 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You've...
…presented almost every pro and con of the Mullin/Nelson debate that I could’ve thought to state. I dig it.
by Zack Vank on Jan 29, 2009 6:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Charles Barkley was saying the same thing.
He doesn’t like how Mullin is being treated in the Bay Area.
by Precise Films Productions on Jan 29, 2009 6:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Every announcer that isn't Bob and Fitz
has expressed sympathy for the “Plight of Mullin”
by Nuck Chorris on Jan 29, 2009 6:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
^ You mean Bob & Jim
I thought Fitz may have on Fitz & Brooks, but I could be wrong. I’m sure Bob & Jim feel that way, but of course, they can’t, or shouldn’t, say it on the air. I’m pretty sure Comcast would get a lot of heat from the Warriors if it happened, and they would then put some heat on Bob & Jim.
Anthony Morrow's jumper is so pure, he has to cut it with baking soda.
by dindin on Jan 29, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bob and Jim
They clearly put a positive spin on things. You can’t fault them for that, though. We don’t want to be depressed while listening to them. We already feel that way on some nights watching it on the floor.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 29, 2009 8:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
has expressed sympathy for the "Plight of Mullin"
What PLIGHT, what’s to stop him from leaving? He’s not married to the franchise. Jezz, do we have to start a shelter for battered NBA managers?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 29, 2009 10:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hahahaha
get used to it atma, he’ll be with the knicks next year!!!
by stevenro59 on Jan 29, 2009 7:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why is Mullin treated the way he is by the organization?
Because of your piece crap owner and his kiss-ass right hand man Bobby Rowell that’s why. I agree that Mullin did not have the greatest draft picks other than Monta and Beidrins (still waiting on the verdict for BWright and Randolph), but he did clean up all the mess he made with Fish, Dumpleavy, and even JRich at the moment.
So yes, it’s definitely very sad and demoralizing to see such a Warrior great being treated the way he is by the franchise in which he provided excellent basketball not only as a player, but as a administrator as well.
Listening to Steve Young today on KNBR, he says that the Cardinals were an organization without a plan, always bringing in and throwing out players and coaches every couple of years. The Steelers are the opposite, having only 3 head coaches in a span of 40 years. That’s what a I continuity and an organization with stability and a plan.
The Warriors have had neither stability and some kind of plan in terms of building a team and management. The organization has been a revolving door for coaches and players especially since the Cohan era. There’s a reason why WE suck almost every single year.
by MasuWarrior on Jan 30, 2009 12:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
About time
First decent post I’ve seen on the front page in a long long time.
Mullin stinks, and he is wearing out his welcome, and there is a strong reason why Rowell has the strings on him…. the owner gets nervous when a flat top New Yorker goes on a spending binge… we dont need another Isaiah Thomas ruining our roster for years to come… although it looks like its about to happen with all the contracts we got.
by sjboy on Jan 30, 2009 8:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The front page...
…has had plenty of posts alluding to Mullin’s failings. If I were jonesing for that, I’d expect to have been tickled pink by now.
by Zack Vank on Jan 30, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yer crazy bro
Mullin made We Believe happen. Assembled the team, took the risk on BD, made the big trade for Jack/Harrington, got the owner to forgive Nellie, let him come back. That’s all Mullin. Mullin got this franchise to the playoffs for the first time in 13 long, long years.
We Suck is 100% Rowell.
It’s night and day.
On top of that Mullin his highly respected across the league. Van Gundy is right. He’s in there and knows what’s going on. Most GMs and players feel the same way. Rowell is nobody, a brown noser, a douche. I take Van Gundy’s perspective over yours any day.
by J Canseco on Jan 30, 2009 10:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I like the point Gundy made when he said, “Yeah mulin made some bad contracts, but he found ways to get rid of them” if anyone could dump maggs’ and Jacks’ awful contracts, its him
by 123707THIZZ on Jan 30, 2009 12:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Atma, you're the man.
Another nice piece of analysis.
by chacabuco on Jan 30, 2009 1:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Wow...
I don’t know how I missed this interesting debate for so long. Very interesting stuff. Great thread.
Thing 2
by olympicmike on Jan 31, 2009 12:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















