Nellie "I hope he [Jack] doesn't (get moved) because I think we've worked that out now"

No need to worry about Jack any more folks, Nellie says it's all worked out now.

21 days ago centerre 16 comments 0 recs |

Comments

Thank Goodness we have Nellie or else this team might be in disarray

It’s been said a million times before, but the sooner we get rid of him the better. You can already see the poison in Monta, and somethings been off about Beans’ attitude as well

by 123707THIZZ on Oct 31, 2009 1:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Agreed

Jack has brought this whole team down except for AR and Curry. We need to trade Maggs and Jack ASAP. Maggs to Minnesota for Blount and Cardinal as expirings. Eventually Cleveland will give in and hand over Z as an expiring. They are playing wait and see so they can buy some time for Powe to come back then they will trade Z. Monta’s biggest issue is that he likes Jack to much so buy getting rid of Jack ,Ellis will be forced to get used to AR, Curry and Ammo. His job depends on it. Or since the Bobcats have some interest we can offer up Law, Jack, George and Claxton for Wallace and Diop.

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Oct 31, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

His job depends on it.

He’s got a contract, he don’t have to like anyone if he don’t want to. Other teams will jump at the chance to pick up a speedster like Montay.

Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky

by Skeptic con Urquell on Oct 31, 2009 2:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Maybe. Monta is a tweener, so I don’t know that he’s terribly valuable. Of course, his contract really isn’t bad. You may be right that there is good demand for him.

Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.

by Naticus2 on Oct 31, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

True

I don’t care if he likes anyone as long as he plays hard for us.

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Oct 31, 2009 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Monta, Maggette, Jackson must go

and I don’t even care what we get in return for them. It was obvious that they are the poison in this team and they infect badly the others who are trying to do something. I heard a lot of people saying Biedrins is soft but I saw yesterday that he just can’t stand this anymore, seeing those three playing egoistic b-ball for their own stats only.

by buky on Oct 31, 2009 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

I understand making Jack and Maggs go....

But why Monta?
He’s probably the most reliable offensive threat we have on the team.
Plus, he’s not playing the point so creating isn’t really left up to him, it’s up to Curry.

by Richboievans on Nov 1, 2009 10:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

But why Monta? he’s not playing the point so creating isn’t really left up to him, it’s up to Curry.

Cause if he’s not playin the point he’s too small to guard 2 guards. Montay said they don’t work well together. The choice is Montay at the point with a big two or Currbury at the point with a big two or Montay /Currbury at the 2 spot with a big point but that’s harder to find. Either way would be a gamble. We know Montay can score but we don’t know how he’ll play point and we suspect Currbury can play point but he hasn’t played enough seasons to really know and he’s not as athletic as Montay at the 2 spot. I’d probably choose based on who we could get for each of them, team with best player offered gets the prize of their choice.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 1, 2009 10:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

It will work as the season goes

All Curry needs to do is get stronger and he should be fine guarding 2’s. He’s a good defender but right now needs to add muscle. If he does that I can see some Baron in him.

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 1, 2009 11:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

All Curry needs to do is get stronger and he should be fine guarding 2’s. He’s a good defender but right now needs to add muscle. If he does that I can see some Baron in him.

I don’t think he’s built like Boom, I expect him to be more like a low rent Iverson ?

by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 1, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

I don't see the difference anyway

When was the last time Baron played defense? The ansswer? Never.

by saintdee on Nov 1, 2009 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Maybe a stronger Bibby?

I don’t see the flashiness of AI in him and Curry is a better passer and defender then him.

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 1, 2009 12:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Curry would never be a Baron – cause Curry plays D, and he wouldn’t be a low rent Iverson, cause I’m assuming Curry goes to practice. Curry will be Curry if he adds 15-20lbs. And intensifies his offense, he’ll be a legitimate pg of the league.

by p8tmydra on Nov 1, 2009 10:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

I'm sure this has...

…been explained at some point, but where the hell did the name Currbury come from?

by Zack Vank on Nov 1, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

+1

And why do people still say Montay? Or why does Morrow call AR ant? Or how many licks does it take to the center of a tootsie pop? The world may never know………

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 1, 2009 6:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs