ESPN's Future Power Rankings -- Warriors don't do so good.
Link may not work for you, as this is an Insider article (NOT TO BRAG). Anyway, John Hollinger and Chad Ford projected each team's future for 2010-2013. It's just one of those silly exercises ESPN does to keep people clicking, but I thought their breakdown of the Dubs was pretty interesting. Here's how they ranked us in the five categories they discussed:
1) Players ("current players and their potential for the future, factoring in expected departures"): 16th out of 30. Sounds about right to me. We lack the superstar and defensive chops you need to have a truly bright future... on the other hand, the people who think we are unusually untalented are pretty far off base. A fair amount of potential, a fair amount of risk... our roster rates about to be roughly average overall. No arguments here.
2) Management ("quality and stability of front office, ownership, coaching"): 30th out of 30. We are last by a mile... we got 9 points out of a possible 200. At this point, I'd be hard-pressed to disagree.
3) Money ("projected salary-cap situation; ability and willingness to exceed cap and pay luxury tax"): 26th out of 30. We'd surely jump a couple spots if we do dump Jack, and even beyond that, I think this may be a little low. Cohan has been consistently willing to approach the luxury tax threshold; he hasn't been willing to exceed it, but IMO, he hasn't had a great reason to. If we dump Jack, I think we should be in the 18-20 range. Lots of teams have bigger money constraints than we do.
4) Market ("appeal to future acquisitions, based on team quality, franchise reputation, city's desirability as a destination, market size, taxes, business and entertainment opportunities, arena quality, fans"): 24th out of 30. Ouch. Kind of hard to argue with, though. We have a solid arena and great fans... that's about it.
5) Draft ("future draft picks; draft positioning"): 8th out of 30th, because we stink. I actually think this is a little high, given that we owe the Nets a (protected) pick.
Overall: 26th out of 30, with this summation: "If Cohan sells the team and the Warriors hire a competent management team and a new coach, their fortunes could change quickly, given their talent. But for now, Golden State is the most dysfunctional team in a league that has several strong candidates for that title."
Pretty solid analysis, if you ask me. What do other people think?
over 2 years ago
onlxn
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Onixn
This is too good for just FanShot! You’re too humble. Move it up to a FanPost.
Golden State of Mind :: Always keeping it... "Unstoppable Baby!"
by Atma Brother ONE on Nov 10, 2009 12:21 PM PST reply actions
4) Market is wack
We live in the 5th largest metropolitan area in the whole country, the bay also seems to love hoops, how does that not factor into their calculations?
they are dumb
we clearly have one of the better basketball markets in the nation…but with our poor management and no superstar…we cant really take advantage of it
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Nov 10, 2009 12:56 PM PST up reply actions
Is this like hte BCS?
Damn! Who cares about making the playoffs and winning a championship. Thats old school. Its all about the power rankings!!!!
by crab dribble cocktail on Nov 10, 2009 1:09 PM PST reply actions
I think i'm becoming a Kings Fan!!
The Kings are looking pretty solid, they just won their 3rd straight! The Ws are disfunctional…
Miguel Cotto will defeat Pacquiao on November 14, 2009! For PUERTO RICO baby..
The Ws are disfunctional…
some things just don’t change….
WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...
by JustSomeName on Nov 11, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions






















