RECAP: Warriors 125, Bucks 129 - At least we were entertained...?

The Warriors contribution to the development and fandom of the NBA industry should not be overlooked. The number of D-league success stories that have passed through the Warriors system is a testament to the NBA's attempt at creating more career opportunities for players. The number of stars that have began their careers at Golden State shows how much the Warriors can -- at times -- evaluate talent. But more importantly, without the Warriors, we wouldn't have exciting games like last night, watching young rookies transition into rising stars in a matter of 48 minutes. The Warriors are the reason why the "NBA is Fantastic!"
Okay, I'm just being facetious... but you know it's kind of true. Anyway...
Even though the Warriors lost this game, there is much to love about what we saw from last night...
Recap: Bucks 129, Warriors 125 (aka the Brandon Jennings show) [Brew Hoop]
The most obvious thing to love: Brandon Jennings second "debut" in two games. After going for 32 and 9 against title contenders, Denver Nuggets, Jennings tops that by showing an amazing arsenal of moves from the inside and out. Floaters over giants, freezing opposing pgs with hesitations then blowing past them for easy layups, rainbow threes...this kid can do it all. In his 5 assists, Jennings showed what has been missing on the Warriors since Baron Davis left: A point guard who can see the floor, get in the paint, and lead his open man. It's only been about 10 regular season games, but will we start including Jennings in discussions of elite point guards by the all-star game?
Love: Curry vs. Jennings mini-shoot out. While Jennings clearly dominated, Curry showed that he could hold his own. Like Jennings, Curry has a couple crossovers which led to easy 15 foot jumpers. You kind of wonder why the Warriors didn't go him more given that he had the hot hand early on. During the stretch of the third when the Warriors couldn't score on the zone defense, I was thinking how helpful Curry might have been had they brought him in earlier.
Like Jennings, Curry plays the point under control... or at least more so than anyone else trying to front like a point guard on the Warriors. Unlike Monta, Curry tends not to put his head down, driving straight to the hoop only giving it up in the event that he needs to get bailed out when 2 big men have closed in on him. The unpredictability of his hesitation moves on dribble drives either gives him just enough space for a jumper or draws defenders in. Check the end of the clip above where he picks Jennings, then while driving to the hoop freezes Jennings with a fake crossover. AMAZING!
Love: The return of the fundamentally-sound big man. Bogut may be considered a racist, but the dude has some nice footwork and a great touch in the paint. Granted, the Warriors big men weren't necessarily much resistance, but there's a lot to like about this guy's inside and outside game. We're beginning to see some of this in Randolph, too. There's a lot to appreciate about shooting .500 and having 0 turnovers.
Love: Monta's left hand. Wow, he finally realized it exists? Last season we would never expect Monta to finish with his left, even in traffic. This season, we've seen Monta tear up defenses (soft ones like Milwaukee) going both directions...even changing directions! "The Mississippi Missile" maybe not be the best nickname, in my opinion.
Love: Under Armor gear! And Jennings work-ethic on camera
Now it's time for...


I'll have to give it up to Stephen Curry. Okay, it's pretty obvious that I'm on his jock a bit too much. And there's nothing "Wonder"ful about him picking up 5 fouls in 26 minutes. But Curry showed me that we might have a point guard of the present (notice how I didn't say future). The fact that he doesn't always drive in predictable straight lines a la Maggette, Jackson, and at times Monta pleases me... as it should please you!
For more on this game from the perspective of the winners (though we're all winners when a fun game like this happens...), check out our colleagues at Brew Hoop!
0 recs |
55 comments
|
Comments
Encouraging loss
Who are these guys? What happened in that 24 hour span between New York and Milwaukee? These guys were focused, they executed their game plan as well as they could against a supposedly defensive team, and they played as a TEAM, even though Jack and, to a lesser extent, Monta were in the game. Say what???
On the offensive end, for the first time this season, I saw people moving without the ball, even when Jack had the ball. In the previous games, players without the ball would simply stand around and watch the play happen. But last night, players were moving around, cutting, trying to provide open passes to the ball handler.
Not only were the players moving, the ball moved too. Players passed the ball to the man down court, to the open man, set up plays for each other, inside then outside, back and forth like a hot potato. It was smooth, natural, in rhythm, no thinking required. It short, it was beautiful. This is the level of unselfishness I expected the Warriors to play at.
Speaking of selfishness, I’m still tired of seeing Jack trying to be a hero and take a quick shot, or a bad 3, or force his way inside, instead of moving it around. I mean, even Corey Maggette has some drive and kick backs to the 3 pt line. But at least the offense wasn’t running through Jack the entire night.
On the defensive end, they certainly put effort into double teaming Bogut down low and to force him to pass. They put effort into moving, deflecting, intercepting passes. They tried to gang defensive rebound. Still quite a few defensive breakdowns, though. In the first half, they didn’t rotate back out and left some wide open 3s. They didn’t get into a shooter’s face when the shot clock was running out. They didn’t chase Jennings off the 3 pt line or get physical with him once he got super hot.
Nevertheless, we must have been doing something right, as we absorbed a 55 pt Jennings performance and only lost by 4. We had nice distributed scoring across everyone except Morrow (What’s wrong with Morrow?). Still got killed in the 3rd qtr with a 16-2 run followed by a 9-2 run. But we didn’t give up, fought back from down 11, and almost had it.
Has the team figured themselves out? Or is this a one time thing? Bring on the Cavs and let’s find out with our 9 man rotation.
by IQofaWarrior on Nov 15, 2009 1:11 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
What’s wrong with Morrow?
I think Morrow working so much on other areas of his game has actually hurt him. It’s not that he magically lost his outside touch, but he used to always catch and shoot instantly. Now he seems to prefer a pump fake, which usually winds up with him not having a shot at all, or having a more contested shot than if he had just launched from the start.
If we had someone that could truly create for others all the time, Morrow would shine. But because we have people that rarely create for others, when they actually do it isn’t as wide open of a look as Morrow might expect, and thus he tries to create his own shot.
by samuraaaaiiiiiii on Nov 15, 2009 1:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even the greatest of shooters learned to creat for themselves......
Morrow’s just going to have to learn like the rest of them did.
Everyone in the league is aware of his shooting abilities by now so i has to learn to create off the dribble.
by Richboievans on Nov 15, 2009 3:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great recap and great game- FANtastic
That was probably the best regular season Warriors game I’ve seen since the spring of 2007 and there were quite a few good ones back in 2007-2008 so that’s saying something. Just outstanding. Unbelievably fun to watch. It was like a throwback to ABA days and 80’s/ early 90’s hoops.
I would’ve liked to see the team not go under on so many Jennings screens, but for the most part there’s nothing to be ashamed about from the Warriors side. They shot 56.1%, moved the ball around, didn’t play dumb or selfish overall, and everyone from Nellie on down looked they had this crazy hunger to win. I’ll take that any day. Monta Ellis showed some nice range, Moore was shockingly lights out from midrange, Corey Maggette was an efficient scoring machine, Randolph played under control, Acie Law continues to show something, and Curry was nice on D (a pick pocket and block on Jennings). Credit Nellie for getting all these guys involved in the right spots- it’s a team game.
And I do love this Brandon Jennings kid. He’s got the tools and personality to be a bonafide superstar in this league. A very likable kid. I had dreams of the Jennings on the Warriors circa draft time. Remember he was The People’s Choice : more words
I don’t fault the Warriors for taking Curry over him, but the Knicks- man what was Donnie Walsh thinking? Imagine Jennings in D’antoni’s offense right now. Imagine Jennings to LeBron in the 2011 playoffs. Isiah Thomas wouldn’t have screwed up that daft pick.
But man. Jennings last night was playing NBA Jam- HE’S ON FIRE!
Golden State of Mind :: Always keeping it... "Unstoppable Baby!"
by Atma Brother ONE on Nov 15, 2009 1:28 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
what the hell is wrong with the 3rd????
last night: outscored 43-26
NY: outscored 28-20
Indiana: 23-20 us
Minn: that whole game was a blowout but 37-22 us
SAC: outscored 31-23
LAC: outscored 34-16
Memphis: 34-23 us
PHX: outscored 30-22
HOU: outscored 35-19
in almost every game we have been outscored by a pretty wide margin in the 3rd, and 2 of the 3 that we outscored the other team we won. If this team is gonna have any kind of success this year(which isn’t looking likely), the 3rd quarter has to change cas we cant continue to be out scored by 8+ every game
by scraider3 on Nov 15, 2009 1:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Half-time is when Jax gives his speech...
“Give me the ball more so I can prove how good I am and get traded off this god awful team. If we get a steal, give it to me so I can hit a transition 3. If we’re playing a half-court game, give it to me so I can dribble into double teams and hit the open man.”
Then reality happens.
by samuraaaaiiiiiii on Nov 15, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if we pick Jennings
There is no way Jennings will scored 55 pts if he is in our roster. Knowing Nelson he will always rather Ellis had the ball than a rookie taking over the game. Look at Morrow and Curry they our both great scorer but they never even had a chance to prove it. Why? Because both of them are not selfish player they never force their shot and try to get their team involve. And guess what Ellis Maggete and Jackson always demand the ball and they got more freedom from the coach not afraid of being a bench warmer from the rest of their season coz they know Nelson wont do it to them. But rookie has always that doubt if they dont play good their season is ended unless someone get injured. Look at Marco Beninellie having fn with the Raptors 2 season ago he never had chance to earn minutes last season he got plague of injury. So if you are a rookie good luck improving with the Warriors
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 15, 2009 1:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Knowing Nelson he will always rather Ellis had the ball than a rookie taking over the game.
Really? Because I’ve seen a lot of times where Curry has been the primary creator/distributor for a bunch of possessions in a row.
And guess what Ellis Maggete and Jackson always demand the ball and they got more freedom from the coach
This probably has a lot to do with the fact that Ellis and Maggette (and possibly Jack) are all better offensive players than Morrow and Curry.
Look at Marco Beninelli
I’m looking, and I see a pretty marginal NBA player getting all of 16 minutes a game, what’s your point?
So if you are a rookie good luck improving with the Warriors
How many people here would agree Randolph improved a substantial amount from the beginning of last season to the end? Pretty much everyone I would think. That’s pretty contrary to this statement of yours…
by Missing Barry on Nov 15, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m looking, and I see a pretty marginal NBA player getting all of 16 minutes a game, what’s your point?
You are looking at a stats Barry I dont blame you if you don;t have a league pass or you never watch Toronto game. My point is Marco is having fun with Raptors than he is with the Warriors. How many times you have seen Marco played with the Warriors last season when he got bench for missing shots.
How many people here would agree Randolph improved a substantial amount from the beginning of last season to the end? Pretty much everyone I would think. That’s pretty contrary to this statement of yours…
Missing something here Barry I don’t know if you watch Warrior game or you just read your Mercury times or Contra Costa. Improving during a rookie year is different than improving during your sophomore years. I said if you are a rookie good luck improving on your rookie year. And you are talking about Randolph he is a sophomore. He improve during the end on the season last season because he got more playing time. We only got like 7 player on the roster last season. So he got more freedom to do his thing. Where is Nelson doesn’t care too much, coz toward the end of the season our win means that we just lose our chance to get a higher pick.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 15, 2009 10:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Really? Because I’ve seen a lot of times where Curry has been the primary creator/distributor for a bunch of possessions in a row.
Really you seen that last time we won he got bench during the Knicks game. Curry is a good point guard but like I said Nelson doesnt want rookie. He probably like Curry for all the rookie he ever has. But he still doesnt trust rookie not like Tyreke dose with the Kings and Jenning with the Bucks. I know Curry can do better than he is right now if only Nelson give him more trust.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 15, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Knicks are just an awful team, dude.
I’m not sure why he didn’t trust Curry on Jennings. He played some good D on him.
by Reverend_Randy on Nov 16, 2009 4:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not a fan of pluralization? Sure, I can agree that Curry doesn’t have the freedom that Jennings or Tyreke probably do, but there’s at least a good reason for that. Curry, in the present, just isn’t the best offensive option on our team. I can’t really fault Nelson for not just handing him the entire offense when we have better options. As for the previous post, I was talking about Randolph as a rookie. He improved substantially, as a rookie, under Nelson. Actually I guess I agree more with your original point than I thought I did – Nelson isn’t going to just give a rookie the most offensive freedom on the team when we have better players, but I don’t see that as a negative thing?
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 7:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nelson isn’t going to just give a rookie the most offensive freedom on the team when we have better players, but I don’t see that as a negative thing?
. Agree thats why my header said it all. Even we draft Jennings there is no way he will score 55 pts with the Warriors.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 16, 2009 8:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
i said that in the open thread.
So I don't have a signature well these words would do! Who knew that upgrades can have downgrades too!
by 24k state fan since 87 on Nov 16, 2009 2:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Probably our most impressive performance of the year… it was only the second time we showed any ability to play with a decent team, and I think the Rockets hadn’t figured yet out their offense when we hung with them Opening Night. Would’ve been great to win, but I have no problem whatsoever in a well-played loss on the road like this.
Plenty of good performances here. Dumb push of Bogut aside, Maggette has been simply amazing so far, by far our best player… ‘Buike injury sucks, but if it means more Maggette, we won’t suffer for it. This was Monta’s most efficient scoring night of the year, and if this three-point stroke is for real, that really ups his potential. Curry had a strong game that will hopefully keep him in the rotation for good. Obviously Mikki’s best game as a Warrior… one board in nineteen minutes is pretty brutal, and I’m leery of trusting that jump shot going forward, but he contributed a bit last night. Good on him. Randolph definitely looked spazzy at moments, but you can’t argue with the production. And another strong energy game from Acie Law… at this point, there’s really no reason not to shop CJ when he becomes tradeable next month.
Most encouragingly, this was the best coaching performance from Nellie all season. I wouldn’t say he coached a brilliant game… we’re still playing a bit smaller than we have to, we were very late to correct for Jennings once he exploded, and the last play didn’t seem particularly well-conceived. But he coached a good game, and he actually strategized, based on game conditions. We double-teamed for stretches here and there. We went to Maggette consistently down low when it was working. Late in the game, they ran that Monta-drive-and-kick-back-to-Maggette-for-three a couple times in a row… that’s not the play I would draw up, necessarily, but it was a play, and it was predicated on what was actually working on the court, not general notions about smallness creating mismatches. For the first time all year, Nellie got more out of our roster than it could’ve gotten just winging it on its own. There was strategy, there was adaption, there was sanity. He was paying real attention in this one.
I’d still like to see Nellie gone. The team’s energy and flow is completely erratic, the lineups are too small even given our injuries, and there seems to be next to no defensive coaching taking place (and that is on the head coach, no matter how many “coordinator” titles he makes up)… that’s not to mention all the soap opera stuff. But if Nellie starts turning in performances like this, where he’s an affirmatively good offensive coach rather than a coach who just lets a bunch of scorers do whatever they want, his continued presence will be a lot easier to swallow.
Only two black marks on this one, one of course being Azubuike’s injury. The other started with 4:18 left in the third quarter. Jack hit a turnaround J, beat his chest and yelled “Give me the ball!” On the next possession, Randolph had the ball at the top of the key… Jack was behind the three-point line to his right. Covered, mind you. Jack motioned for the ball. When Randolph refused to give it to him (he ended up driving and drawing a foul), Jack put his arms down and stared at Randolph with complete contempt. Kudos, Jack! This moment, and Jack’s post-game complaint that he had to inbound on the last play, are useful reminders. Jack is by no means our only problem, and he is probably not even our main problem. But he is still a problem, and we really do need to send this turkey packing.
Fun, encouraging game. Tuesday should be fun… it’s as pure of a “nothing to lose” game as it gets.
by onlxn on Nov 15, 2009 2:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Love: Monta’s left hand.
Monta’s a pretty great finisher inside for a guard…but I’m not sure what you’re seeing out of his left hand in terms of dribbling? I see a guy who really struggles going left and heavily relies on his right hand for all of his moves and drives. I’m actually beginning to get worried about it.
by Missing Barry on Nov 15, 2009 2:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I've complained on Monta's left hand quite a bit in the past
And I def. agree with your assessment of his limited handle. I remember cringing and thinking “here comes the turnover” anytime in the past where he went left and had the ball dangling wildly in front of him, only to corral it in with his right hand.
No double his handle is shaky and I personally don’t see him ever being a PG in any shape or form. But I feel it’s a gigantic step forward that he can actually cross right to left occasionally or even finish with his left hand for that matter. Oh, how our expectations are so low when it comes to the Warriors..haha…
by dj fuzzylogic on Nov 15, 2009 3:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here we go again Barry
Are You talking about Monta 2007? Because so far Monta can either can go left or right or vice versa. He already work on that, so its not problem.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 15, 2009 11:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Watch closely. Seriously, try to count the number of times Monta goes left. I’m not talking about a crossover from right to left and one dribble with his left hand, he can do that fine – I’m talking about using his left hand as the primary hand to make a move. Watch him try to go left off a pick and roll instead of right. He can’t do it. His left hand is a legitimate weakness in the present. It is a problem, and it limits what he can do offensively.
But if you really don’t agree, just count the number of times he starts his dribble with his left hand and goes left without involving his right hand in the move. You won’t need a pen and paper or anything to keep track, you should have enough fingers on one hand to do that.
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 7:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Opposing, scout, coaches or players probably count how many times Monta start with his right. But like I said he is more improve now with his left. Whenever he started his dribble to the right. So opponent can force him to go left. Well guess what Monta just discover his left hand when he fell on the Moped.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 16, 2009 8:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
One play....costly decision
17 seconds left…Warriors have the ball back… They had managed to force a turnover EXACTLY as they needed to do…the Bucks commentators were staggered… and so we have the ball…
What happens next was bizarre lunacy….
We ran a play as if we had 5 seconds left on the clock…. bearing in mind we have a 24 second shot clock but only 17 seconds left in the game…
Now any half brained moron would have told them to keep it calm… run the clock down to around 8 seconds….then pop the ball movement, look for the 3 (which the Bucks were defending against)..if not with 2 seconds to go..take the easy two and hope to take the clock to roughly a second or out comepletely… Go to OT..regroup…and work out a plan to double team or just illiminate the threat from Jennings with some hard body to body play..(the kid is not that big..).
But no…. we ran a 5 second play where Morrow got trapped and seemed to panic and to my eyes seemed to have no idea what was on the shot clock…and chucked up a brick of a three point attempt. Now…if he makes it..great we lead by one….but they still have 10 seconds on the clock….???
So again…who was the grand ideas master for that play??? Or did the players just completely lose their heads and panic….in which case…this is the NBA fellas…you are meant to be the best in the world… do we seriously panic with 10 seconds left?
The whole defensive choices (or lack thereof) to change how we defended Jennings cost us this game…. BUT… that play at 17 seconds left in the 4th… stuck the dagger in the potential for a win…
Great effort from the team…Defense is still poor (covered in my other thread) but the fact is….we could and SHOULD have won that game…and games like this that slip away all start to add up come February….
GSOM Blog Beast!
by BritWarriorGSW on Nov 15, 2009 2:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah......
I know for a fact that was not the play Nellie drew up in the huddle.
I really do think Morrow panicked. I understand though just because he’s never been in those pressure situations. He’ll learn, but I hope it’s soon.
by Richboievans on Nov 15, 2009 3:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Now any half brained moron would have told them to keep it calm… run the clock down to around 8 seconds….then pop the ball movement, look for the 3 (which the Bucks were defending against)..if not with 2 seconds to go..take the easy two and hope to take the clock to roughly a second or out comepletely
This is a very, very poor strategy when you’re losing. When you’re losing, you take the first good shot you can get. Now, if you don’t think Morrow’s shot was a good one, that’s fine, I have no objection. But trying to hold the ball for a last second shot when you’re already losing is not a smart strategy, if you miss, you lose. You want to extend the game as long as possible and create as many possessions as you can.
by Missing Barry on Nov 15, 2009 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Most amazing stat of the night:
Jamal Crawford with NBA.com’s “Assist of the Night”
by bradyk2 on Nov 15, 2009 2:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm happy with the rookie we have
Right now, he has a far different role than Brandon Jennings. As evidenced by these stats:
Curry got 14 points in 26 minutes, on 66% shooting including 2-2 from 3.
He got 0 of these points while playing alongside Monta Ellis. ZERO.
That, in a nutshell, expresses the different situations these rookies find themselves in.
by Feltbot on Nov 15, 2009 4:17 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
+1
That’s an interesting thing… none of his points alongside Ellis…
by samuraaaaiiiiiii on Nov 15, 2009 5:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He got 0 of these points while playing alongside Monta Ellis. ZERO.
So that makes him better than Jennings?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 15, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Curry scoring zero next to Monta had nothing to do with Monta
In the 1st 3 qtrs,Curry was Monta’s backup, so they were not playing at the same time. In the 4th qtr, they played together for a little over 9 minutes. Curry only had one attempt, which was the blocked layup after stealing from Jennings. The majority of the time, Curry played the role of the distributor, often times to Maggette. Monta’s scoring was not from ball hogging or not passing to Curry. It was because the rotation came back to him, and he either took the 3 pt shot, or was already driving down the lane.
Towards the end of the game, they kept going to Maggette for the mismatch and it was working. It became a Monta and Maggette two man game for a couple of plays and that worked too. The final minute of play went to the vets, including Monta.
So I didn’t see anything that made me think Monta and Curry aren’t getting along on the floor, or Monta is intentionally ignoring Curry. If we see more scoreless Curry stints with Monta, then it warrarnts a deeper look. Until then, I call that stat a coincidence.
by IQofaWarrior on Nov 15, 2009 8:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My point
is simply that Curry has a far different role than Jennings at the moment. First of all, Curry and Jennings are far different players as point guards. Curry is on the Nash track, Jennings is on the Iverson, Arenas, Devin Harris track. But secondly, if Curry had the reins of the Warriors like Jennings has the reins of the Bucks, there’s no doubt in my mind that he too would be a 20 pt. a game scorer. At the moment, Curry is being forced to take a back seat to the veterans on the Warriors.
I think that may change soon.
by Feltbot on Nov 16, 2009 12:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Since Barons been gone..
Our game winning/tying shots have been dogpoop. I’d like to see Curry take the final shots, he’s the only one who can shoot effectively and get himself a good shot off the dribble. Unlike Monta, Curry has unlimited range.
Formally known as PFortyy.
http://www.youtube.com/user/XeroEnt
Watch my Warriors vids and subscribe!
by Xero on Nov 15, 2009 5:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Curry is not the warriors savior, Baron was the savior of the Ws
Natural Go Getta!
by slamson on Nov 15, 2009 6:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Key word – was. You think the Clippers are happy to have Baron and his contract right now?
by Missing Barry on Nov 15, 2009 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well better than our Maggete contract
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 15, 2009 10:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No it’s not. I loved Baron as much as the next guy, but he’s just not very good so far this year and his contract is monstrous.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
by Naticus2 on Nov 16, 2009 12:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not only that, but Corey Maggette has been incredible so far this year. Per 36 minutes:
26.4 PTS, (.533 FG%), 6.6 REB, 2.9 AST, 2.4 TO, 1.3 STL
He’s scoring both more frequently than he ever has and more efficiently than he ever has, and for Corey Maggette, that’s saying a helluva lot. There are all sorts of possible caveats — small sample size (totally true), his limited minutes inflate his numbers (I don’t buy it but not impossible), he’s advantaged by playing out of position (I really don’t buy this one, but not impossible). I don’t expect him to keep up this pace by any means. Still and all, Maggette is looking pretty damn good. He was a lot better than Baron last year, he’s a lot better this year, and he makes less per season. I frankly would prefer that we had neither, so we had the available minutes and cap space to rebuild in peace. But if you have to have one or the other, thus far, it’s been an easy choice. Corey Maggette.
by onlxn on Nov 16, 2009 1:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but he’s just not very good so far this year
He just scored 24pts last night against the Thunder. But if Baron isn’t great with the Clippers just because he is still trying to adjust to Dunleavy system. Maggete is just another ball hog to our system. no court vision, and fumble on the last minute of the fourth quarter. Where Baron on his best is a real clutch player.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 16, 2009 10:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But if Baron isn’t great with the Clippers just because he is still trying to adjust to Dunleavy system.
Funny, because with Baron’s history, him “adjusting to the system” is the exception, rather than the rule. He’s much more likely to feud with coaches, show up out of shape, ballhog and make no effort to run any semblance of offense, and just generally not give a hoot than to put the effort in you’d expect a good player to, learn the system, and play team basketball…
Maggete is just another ball hog to our system. no court vision, and fumble on the last minute of the fourth quarter
I wouldn’t call Maggette a ballhog, but it’s certainly fair to call him a black hole. He’s a terrible passer. If you give him the ball he’s probably going to shoot it. Here’s the thing, though. Maggette shooting the ball is one of the better things you can have happen. He’s very good at scoring points – not only does he score at a very respectable rate, he scores with well above average efficiency as well. It might look ugly, you might hate that he always seems to get bailed out by the whistle, but just remember, at the end of the day, the Warriors score more points in a given amount of possessions that they would without him doing what he does.
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ummmm
who here wanted jennings over curry before the draft?
I will always be your fan JRich. Good Luck
by chili01 on Nov 15, 2009 6:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Depends how far before the draft. I was totally gaga for Jennings for a couple weeks during the pre-draft festivities (basically, after draftexpress wrote an extensive piece detailing how much his personality and game had matured); but I was convinced he wouldn’t fall to #8. In the couple weeks leading up to the draft, when the choices seemed to have narrowed to Curry/Hill, I jumped ship to Curry. On draft day I would have been thrilled with Jennings or Curry, and totally crestfallen if we had picked Hill.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 15, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Latest on Buike: Sunday meeting with doctors inconclusive, MRI scheduled for Monday.
As Brit said in the game thread, anything with patella is usually bad. (Patella is sort of the opposite of Nutella in this respect). If the patellar tendon is ruptured, they estimate 3-5 months — in essence the whole season. This would of course would suck royally, since in addition to being such a sweet, soft-spoken dude, he was looking like our best, most consistent wing player before he went down. Best/miracle case scenario: a strain, along the lines of what happened to Redd a couple weeks ago.
Fingers and toes crossed…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 15, 2009 6:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Best case scenario
would be for Shells and GTTM to go over and pamper him a bit to cheer him up.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 15, 2009 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't mind coming over and read a book to him.
Will this matter a year from now?
by girltothemax on Nov 15, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll come too. I’m a good reader also. heh heh
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
by Naticus2 on Nov 16, 2009 12:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
dont forget meee! :)
Azubuike? More like Azucutie!
by goldenstatelove on Nov 15, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
how could I forget you?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 16, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Whenever Buike start scoring we always won the game
Now without him I hope Morrow start stepping up his game.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
by mykelala01 on Nov 16, 2009 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How is anyone encouraged by the Bucks game???
I agree it was a pleasant surprise to see a high level of play from our guys, the loss of Azubuike is really devastating. He is easily one of our top 3 players this season, and now he’s out for the year.
by Aliengames on Nov 15, 2009 6:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Just watched the 3rd quarter again...
Watson and Law were TERRIBLE defending Jennings. The couple times Ellis and Jackson defended Jennings, he couldn’t take the shot (although he got passed Ellis once to get the shot).
I think most of the blame should be on our coaches for not realizing that Watson couldn’t handle Jennings far sooner.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Nov 15, 2009 7:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
How could you put yourself through so much pain?
I’d seriously commit suicide if I were to watch that disgusting 3rd quarter ever again.
Formally known as PFortyy.
http://www.youtube.com/user/XeroEnt
Watch my Warriors vids and subscribe!
by Xero on Nov 15, 2009 7:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can appriciate good basketball by Jennings...
although I really got to see how bad of a defender CJ was against him..
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Nov 15, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i'll take your word on that
because I do NOT want to watch that qtr again. The other 3 qtrs, I’m OK.
by IQofaWarrior on Nov 15, 2009 8:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Jennings is way better than Curry : (
The Warriors need to go to the D League!
Natural Go Getta!
by slamson on Nov 15, 2009 11:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 























