NBA Approval of Jackson Trade Continues the Reign of an Incompetent Franchise
When Larry Riley was given the General Manager title for the Golden State Warriors, as a fan of the team it was only a matter of time before Riley would run the team into the ground and it's happened already, just nine games into the season.
Yet, that was foreshadowed immediately during the offseason with the trades of Marco Belinelli and Jamal Crawford. Both trades the Warriors got players who weren't going to produce much for the team.
While Belinelli was just starting to show signs of being a strong player for the Warriors especially on the defensive end. Crawford though defensively inept was always a capable scorer as well and did much more in his NBA career than Law and Speedy Claxton who also came over in the deal.
Now the icing on the cake though was the trade that was announced today and approved by the NBA. The trade calls for the Warriors to send Stephen Jackson and Acie Law to the Charlotte Bobcats for Raja Bell and Vladimir Radmanovic.
I get the fact that the Warriors needed to get rid of Jackson, but this was exactly what I was afraid of getting a two players who are nowhere near the same caliber as Jackson in the deal.
Let's face it Jackson last year averaged just under 21 points per game, averaged 6.5 assists per game, and 5 rebounds. Law showed what he could do in limited minutes for the Warriors and actually was one of the only players on the team that actually put forth a quality effort when he got into the games. Law in my opinion was just a throw into make the salaries work.
Jackson is better than Bell and Radmanovic combined and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the numbers and see that.
Of course the NBA also plays a role in this for allowing the trade to be accepted. What's maddening now is that the NBA cares so much about salary cap situations that it doesn't really matter about the players involved in the trade.
I mean just go to ESPN.com and click on the trade machine. In theory you could put a trade there that has Stephen Jackson and Andris Biedrins going to the Cleveland Cavaliers for Lebron James.
Would the trade ever happen? No, Cleveland would never accept it, but based on salaries it would work.
That's what happened with the trade of Jackson it was because of Jackson's and Law's salaries matched up with Bell's and Radmanovic's salaries.
Even more disconcerting is the fact that the NBA ignored the fact that Bell is injured. He could clearly just decide the Warriors franchise is going nowhere and opt to have surgery on his injured wrist.
Well at least the Warriors are living up to the bill of their reputation as being an incompotent franchise heading nowhere!
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
Well
Offer a better solution to this whole situation?
by Oracle Junkie on Nov 16, 2009 10:28 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Uhhh.
You can’t be serious. We got rid of a crippling contract, as well as one of the biggest malcontents in the league, and we actually got back salary-cap friendly deals. I absolutely love the deal. I’m not totally sure but I think we save something like 20 million bucks in the deal, plus free up more minutes for our youngsters. In case you haven’t realized, we aren’t making the playoffs this year, so this was an astute trade to help us rebuild.
Granted the front office made the bed we are laying in, but this was a nice trade to dump Jack’s albatross of a contract.
Marco Belinelli=Future Warrior Legend. 'Nuff Said.
by BeLEGENDelliAllDay on Nov 16, 2009 10:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I can't understand how people are upset with this deal
We were NEVER going to get back anything of equal value for Jackson. Thats the reality of it folks. When a guy comes out and says he wants to be traded, its already assumed at that point that you are going to have to take a loss, especially in Jackson’s situation where he is a headcase at times, is older, and still has a huge contract left. I’m happy that we got a guy in Bell who is good for the locker room, plays tough D, and can score a little (hopefully he heals up fast,) and to be honest, even if Rad Vlads contract is inflated, he is 6’10 and can shoot the three a little, something that will help the Warriors considering they have no bigs left currently. Plus cap space to sign all the free agents lining up to come play here!
by Pearlsofwisdom on Nov 16, 2009 10:37 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Rocky is upset about everything, always.
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, this is about the best we could have asked for. Jackson and his monster contract have little value in this league.
I just feel bad for the Bobcats
by FishStix on Nov 16, 2009 10:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
While Belinelli was just starting to show signs of being a strong player for the Warriors especially on the defensive end.
What’s maddening now is that the NBA cares so much about salary cap situations that it doesn’t really matter about the players involved in the trade.

My favorite line:
Let’s face it Jackson last year averaged just under 21 points per game, averaged 6.5 assists per game, and 5 rebounds.
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 16, 2009 10:40 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
+1
He was also great in the local community!
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 16, 2009 10:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
“What’s maddening now is that the NBA cares so much about salary cap situations that it doesn’t really matter about the players involved in the trade.”
He’s aware that this isn’t a fantasy basketball league where the other owners can vote to block a trade if they think it’s unfair, right?
My vote for fanpost of the year.
Marco Belinelli=Future Warrior Legend. 'Nuff Said.
by BeLEGENDelliAllDay on Nov 16, 2009 10:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Fanpost of the year? In what way? There is 0 substance to this fanpost. The closest to substance it has is the stats Jack put up last year – unfortunately, it uses the wrong stats, so we can’t even count that.
While Belinelli was just starting to show signs of being a strong player for the Warriors especially on the defensive end. Crawford though defensively inept was always a capable scorer as well and did much more in his NBA career than Law and Speedy Claxton who also came over in the deal.
Belinelli was a marginal NBA player. There’s a reason he’s averaging only 17 mpg on a team that loves no rebounding, white Europeans that can shoot and not do much else. We had many better wings than him. Just not a big deal at all. Crawford is not a capable scorer. Capable scorers don’t need to shoot as often as Crawford to score the points he does. Simply put, most NBA players would score more points than Crawford if they simply shot it as often as he does. Not to mention he’s god awful defensively and rebounds like a 10 year old girl. And I don’t mean a 10 year old on the A team, I’m talking town rec league here. The Raptors bought Belinelli off us, and we got out of Crawford’s contract. Those are positives.
As for the Jack trade – it’s about more than just matching salaries. It’s about getting rid of guaranteed contracts. Jack still had 3 years left on his deal. We got out of that. That is a good thing.
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In fairness to Crawford
He is playing good ball right now, but that has more to do with the roll he is put in. He is a 6th man not a starter.
by Oracle Junkie on Nov 16, 2009 11:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not always easy to...
convey sarcasm on the internet. My bad. Maybe I’ll say My Vote for “Fanpost of the Year”.
Marco Belinelli=Future Warrior Legend. 'Nuff Said.
by BeLEGENDelliAllDay on Nov 16, 2009 11:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha my bad. At least most of my post was about the fanpost itself, rather than your comment, so it’s still relevant…
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fire Nellie! Fire Cohan! Fire Gregory! Fire David Stern! No need for explanations, just fire em all!
by Missing Barry
31 Y 6.5 ft 250 lbs 0 IQ
Fire Nellie! Fire Cohan! Fire Gregory! Fire David Stern! No need for explanations, just fire em all!
by Missing Barry
by Lat We N Trash on Nov 16, 2009 10:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Right
Because the salary that the Warriors franchise has saved means one of the top free agents from 2010 is going to come calling. Isn’t this the same franchise that ran Chris Mullin out of town? Refused to sign Baron Davis long term? Traded Jason Richardson for Brandan Wright?
Wasn’t this also the same team that was written about having the problem of no self respecting player would ever want to join the franchise as long as Don Nelson was coaching and the ownership of Chris Cohan?
The answer to all the questions is yes. Here’s another question who has been the biggest signing as a free agent by the Warriors in recent memory? Give you a hint there’s only one name and it’s Corey Maggette!
It doesn’t really take much research or an effort to find exactly why the Warriors have been to the playoffs once in what’s going to be 17 years.
by Rocky63215 on Nov 16, 2009 12:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Calling the Warriors a poorly run franchise since Cohan took over is stating the obvious. Everyone knows this, nobody disputes it. Your argument is simply “move made by bad franchise, so it means franchise is bad”. Circular argument with nothing to back it up whatsoever, and frankly doesn’t add much to the discussion. Yes, the Warriors are a disappointing franchise. We know. How does this trade make them worse off? Jack was a malcontent, he’s also not nearly as good as “just under 21 points per game, averaged 6.5 assists per game, and 5 rebounds” suggests. He gets his points through volume shooting – he’s not efficient about it, suggesting if some other average offensive player took those shots instead of him, we’d end up with at least as many, and maybe more, points than if he took those shots. That doesn’t help the team win. He does distribute well, at times, but he also distributes poorly at times and consistently turns the ball over at a high rate. He’s a very poor rebounder, once you take pace, position and minutes played into account, there is no other conclusion you can come to other than he’s extremely bad at rebounding. He has some defensive ability, but rarely shows the necessary effort on that end, and is not as good defensively as his on ball defense would make you believe. His contract was terrible, and a hindrance to the franchise long term.
So instead, we get out of his contract and ditch a player that was unhappy. He didn’t have much trade value – the fact that we didn’t take a bad contract in return is a good thing. The Warriors are in a better position right now than when I woke up this morning, for these reasons.
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 12:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just to put some stats out there – Stephen Jackson has a career below average scoring efficiency of 52.3% (TS%). He has a career per 36 assist rate of 3.5, compared to 2.8 turnovers. He gets 4.2 rebounds per 36, that’s not even good for a PG, let alone a 3.
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You Forgot
Mitch Richmond For Billy Owens and braking up run TMC for no real reason at all..The only free agent that would ever sign with the dysfunctional Warriors, is one that doesn’t have any other offers or someone that we have to grossly overpay
by The Sear on Nov 16, 2009 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Even when the Warriors were supposedly after Amare Stoudemire, Stoudemire stated that he would never play for the team. So, really what does that really say about the franchise?
by Rocky63215 on Nov 16, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That the franchise is poorly run, as 100% of people would agree with?
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Besides That
Would a free agent really want to sign with a club with that many problems?
by Rocky63215 on Nov 16, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, another point most people are in pretty strong agreement about. We know Gil and Brand rejected us, it’s not news…
by Missing Barry on Nov 16, 2009 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So where does this money go the supposed 21 million dollars?
Right back to Cohan’s pocket!
by Rocky63215 on Nov 16, 2009 9:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















