What's Anthony Morrow's future role with this team?
Lets get this out of the way, he doesn't like too miss very much. He is the best shooter in the NBA by far right now. He's a good rebounder and is starting too get better on defense. But With Curry and Ellis showing that they can work and will and are working well together it's obvious Morrow won't ever be starting at shooting guard for us. What about Small forward? At 6'5 210 he may need to get stronger and he may be a little short to be playing it but in the last couple games he has played great there. But can he be a full time starter there?
He looks good there now but once this season is over we will get Kelenna Azebuike back and he will surely reclaim that spot right? Wrong. As I see it either one can start and I would be fine with it but Morrow needs to polish his game a lot more. But they would have to compete for that job if our roster stands pat. As of now he can shoot and well.... thats about it. He's getting better at putting the ball on the floor and passing but even Ray Allen developed a driving game. But is small forward suited for him? Or would he better as a 6th man type shooting guard getting 20+ minutes off the bench?

That shot went in.....
If someone isn't moved there will be no minutes too go around. You would have Maggs, Buike, Morrow, Ellis, Curry, a rookie, and Vladimir Radmonovich all getting minutes at shooting guard/small forward. Someone needs to go because Morrow is a key part of our future and is just as much a key as Curry may be. Azebuike may leave since he can opt out but since he's injured it's unlikely, Ellis leaving? Sorry Monta haters he's here to stay, Curry? No. Vlad? Probably not. Maggette? He's can maybe be thrown out as trade bait in the off season for an expiring deal. Even if he does have a good year he should not be apart of this young teams plan. I think Maggs has played great lately and I'm not ripping on him but for Morrow's sake he should be traded. Maybe if Washington gets *really* desperate for more draft picks and we package him for Butler with our 1st round pick? That clears a contract and Morrow can safely say he will be getting 20+ a game (more like 25 - 30) and saves us money and not to mention even better ball movement. Or if they won't buy it we can trade him for Marko Jaric, it's not pretty but gives us an expiring. Lets say he isn't traded, there is no room for a draft pick or playing time for Morrow. But then again if Buike leaves there may be no need for a trade.
Morrow's skill sets says he is a 2 but is capable of the 3 if he gained some muscle which he may do. We have lost most of our games this year when he scores 9 or less. Kinda suggesting huh? He needs playing time and shots and he will get that this year but his future may look uncertain if we keep all of our wings. So where is his future? Future starting small forward? 25 - 30 minute a game sub? Only a marksman who comes in at certain times?

Rudy don't even bother trying against him....
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
140 comments
Comments
Morrow's future role?
Total badass. Once he learns how to use the triple threat effectively it’s game over for everyone.
by HOLDEMUPGoldenStateOfOppression on Nov 25, 2009 1:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Can you remember a time when we had a better shooter???
I can’t there is no way Morrow should be out of the starting lineup IMO
Thank you Al Davis for Michael Crabtree!!!!!
by Athletic on Nov 26, 2009 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
6th man? Seriously people?
Morrow is the perfect starting 3 for our team.
Consider Maggette. Horrible in the starting role because he is inconsistent, inefficient, demands the ball a alot, and kills the ball movement. But he is a good scorer and is a good spark off of the bench.
Morrow is the complete opposite. He is consistent and extremely efficient and a great team player who perfectly compliments Ellis and Curry who are guys that can drive and dish, plus every aspect of his game is just solid and he is always improving. Not to mention, the best shooter in the league!!
The Ellis, Curry, Morrow combination is deadly!!! Did you guys watch the game tonight?? Morrow was 6/8 from three. With out him, we don’t win, period. Time after time he bailed us out, and ellis and curry know to find him and create for him. I would rather lose Anthony Randolph than him!
by Agent Zero on Nov 25, 2009 2:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Randolph instead of Morrow?
Lets not get carried away here….Morrow did a heck of a job last night, but the only thing he consistently does is shoot the ball. His rebound/assist numbers are low and there is that one outliner where they are high. Randolph’s ceiling is much higher.
by Bellringer21 on Nov 25, 2009 3:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Randolph vs Morrow
Thankfully this is not a choice we have to make. Morrow will (hopefully) get extended this off-season, and Randolph is already locked in for two more years.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 11:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
These are the types of things that are easier to do when you free up cap space. Some people are so convinced we won’t sign a FA with the cap space we get from our expirings…I just would like to point this out as an example of a situation that extra space can be very helpful without signing a FA with it…
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 MB
Extra space is always helpful, overpaid FA’s not so much. Some sucka-ass GM is going to get duped into paying out a max contract for Amare this offseason, and then years after he gets fired his ex-team will still be hamstrung by the inflexibility he created.
We appear to be trying something genuinely new in the NBA, which is grow a team from the ground up. Of course part of this is from necessity. It has been very difficult to attract proven talent for quite a while now. At the same time, once our homegrown talent matures, we will need all the flexibility we can get so we can avoid losing the team to poachers and vultures (rival GM’s and agents).
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 2:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We appear to be trying something genuinely new in the NBA, which is grow a team from the ground up.
not so rare, Oklahoma comes to mind recently.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 2:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good franchises like the Spurs always build from the ground up. Developing and keeping homegrown talent is essential to any team wanting to have long-term success.
by gobigg415 on Dec 1, 2009 6:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, like the lakers and celtics, right?
Your statement might be accurate if you replace “always” with “often”
by freerandolph on Dec 2, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he looks lost out there
he’s an athlete yeh, he doesn’t even look like he’s a basketball player. LOTS of potential. But that just mean he hasn’t done anything yet.
by Agent Zero on Nov 26, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This team can't outscore everyone every night
I love Morrow and think he should be getting 24+ a night, but I think his long-term niche on this team is as the 6th man getting substantial burn.
If he can show that he can defend SF’s at this level, I’m all for him taking a bigger spot, but he needs to be a more well-rounded player to get my vote.
by dprodigy19 on Nov 25, 2009 3:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maggette is not inefficient. That is simply false.
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 6:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Corey needs to go ASAP!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
by JonDoe on Nov 25, 2009 9:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ummm…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d like to point out that Corey Maggette is having a nearly identical season to his doppelganger, “Corey Maggette Redux” Amar’e Stoudemire. Slightly better actually.
Per 36 minutes
Corey 24.6 pts (.601 TS%) / 7.5 reb / 2.7 ast / 1.3 (blk + stl) / 2.6 tov
Amare 20.4 pts (.612 TS%) / 7.6 reb / 1.1 ast / 1.7 (blk + stl) / 2.9 tov
(NB: “Corey Maggette Redux” a registered trademark of Adam Lauridsen).
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions 7 recs
Nice. Amare is officially overrated.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow. crazy stats. Thanks Sleepy.
Lets trade Monta, Curry, Buike, AB and Morrow for Amare.
Rec’d also bro.
Romes Mac Mojous
by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 25, 2009 1:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lets trade Monta, Curry, Buike, AB and Morrow for Amare.
would free up cap space and the logjam of little point guards :>)
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
'cept
the suns are leading their/our division.
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
by fotd on Nov 25, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Having that Steve Nash guy always helps, I’ve heard he’s ok.
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
God I still can’t believe how piss poor Amare’s rebounding is. I wasn’t sure it would improve from last year, but there was no way I was expecting it to get even worse. Hindsight makes not trading for Amare look very good, indeed…
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that’s just awful. and those stats don’t even show what an abysmal defender he is…
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Nov 28, 2009 1:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good. keep making these comparisons
hopefully GMs will take notice and teams might actually want him.
by Agent Zero on Nov 26, 2009 6:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Amar'e is being asked to do different things this year.
His impact on the game is clearly much different then Corey’s.
This is why the experts dont look at numbers to make their decisions. This PER 36 is the worst thing that could happen to internet basketball fans, since Web MD hit the World Wide Web. Everybody thinks they’re a doctor, and now with this PER 36, everyone thinks they are a scout/GM.
Amar’e overrated huh? How about these numbers:
With Amar’e their #1 in the West.
Without Amar’e they dont make the playoffs.
Common denominator?
by sjboy on Nov 30, 2009 8:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WithAmar’eSteve Nashtheirthey’re #1 in the West.
WithoutAmar’eSteve Nash they don’t make the playoffs.
There we go, fixed. Much better.
by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 9:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ok
How many games did they win with Nash in the lineup last year?
Oh wait he must of missed alot of games… oh wait he played 74?
Right ok.
How many did Amar’e play? 53? And they won 46 games.
Right I am sure its 100% all Nash. Uh huh. Keep believing that buddy.
by sjboy on Nov 30, 2009 5:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What, exactly, does Amare do to help a team win? Other than not play D and not rebound? Have you watched Steve Nash? There’s a reason his +/- is so good.
by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I cant help your stats need...
You really really need to stop looking at stats. They are the #1 way to look stupid in an arguement. I am not calling you stupid, all I am saying is that just mentioning stats to prove if someone is worthy is completely ridiculous.
What does he bring to the table?
Well, he can play the 5/4/3 (sometimes). He can shoot from the perimeter at a REALLY high efficiency. What does that mean?
That means Tim Duncan will not sit next to the basket to SWAT every Monta drive to the hoop.
He is a legit post up player. What does that mean?
That means YOU HAVE TO DOUBLE TEAM him. If you dont, he will own you 3/4 of the time. Once you double he can pass the ball efficiently, and with Curry and Morrow sitting at the 3 point line, game over. Also, Monta can drive to the hole, if his man leaves him in a rotation.
Also he is 6-10, 255lbs, and runs faster then Randolph and is insanely athletic. What does this mean?
This means he is a threat on a fast break EVERY SINGLE time, which means the other team’s center is going to be GASSED. Also, you can run a LEGIT pick N roll with him, something currently we cannot do, because pretty much none of our bigs can step out and hit a jumper.
On the defensive end:
He is a good rebounder, he just gets asked to run out on a fast break as soon as possible. Which means his SF/C get most of the rebounds. This is by design, not by flaw. 1 on 1 defense? He is pretty good, but not great. He is a good team defender, thats why he gets in foul trouble, much like Andris when he plays team D with us lol
This is what I know, see and have experienced watching Amar’e and the Warriors.
Its an absolute slam dunk that this guy would probably even win MVP on our team. 30pts, and 14reb a night EASILY, if not 6 assists JUST FROM MORROW.
Sorry this is lengthy, but none of this have to do with stats, or PER, it has to do with stuff that doesnt show up in the stat sheet.
by sjboy on Nov 30, 2009 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry this is lengthy, but none of this have to do with stats, or PER, it has to do with stuff that doesnt show up in the stat sheet.
Did you mean to write something more like: “Sorry I ignore facts when they get in the way of my opinion…”
Look, there’s a reason for citing stats. If you say someone is a good rebounder, we can actually look to see whether he rebounds well or not. In Amare’s case, he has turned into a pretty god awful rebounder for a big guy. Not many bigs in the league rebound worse than he does. He used to be much better, but the fact is now he does not get many rebounds, something that helps win games. There is no getting around this fact. This is something he’s doing that actively hurts his team, as an average big guy would get more rebounds than he does. This is a fact. Just because you want to think differently does not change what actually happens.
As for Amare, he is a good scorer. Not denying that. Having a guy like him that can get easy buckets is a good thing – not only does he score at a pretty decent rate, he does so very efficiently. True, but he’s not a good passer. He’s a black hole with the ball, so it’s debatable how much this actually makes his teammates better. That’s why he’s pretty much at the bottom of the league in assists – if someone gets the ball as often as he does and they’re a good passer, they’re going to get more assists than he does. Plain and simple. Offensively, his scoring obviously helps a team, and does quite a bit, but other than that, he basically doesn’t provide a team with anything. He doesn’t block shots (indicating he’s not much of an offball defender) or get steals, he doesn’t get rebounds, he doesn’t guard his own guy, he doesn’t pass…plain and simple, he’s a scorer. A very good scorer, but a scorer and nothing else. Don’t let the facts get in your way though, continue ignoring anything that doesn’t conform to your previously held beliefs….
(If you have actual facts to back up your analysis, though, you’re more than welcome to include them. Just saying someone who doesn’t rebound or pass will all of a sudden do these things better than any other big man in the league, though, is just ridiculous.)
by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but saying
Corey Maggette has the same impact on a game as Amar’e Stoudemire is 100% REDONKULOUS…
I dont know what facts I was ignoring…. here is fact… he is a multi-time allstar, olympian, 1st team all NBA, 20/10 errr 9 guy pretty much for his career, and Maggette has never been an allstar or anything I just listen.
So those are my facts, yours are PER. Do you see how PER just failed you again?
I also explained at fuill length the impact of having certain players on the court that stats do not pop up on the stat sheet, and you just stepped all over that by still continuing to say Amar’e just scores.
Ok if he is just a scorer, just this black hole… then how come he is going to get a max contract? Oh and probably every team in the association wanting to sign him?
Get real man.
by sjboy on Dec 1, 2009 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you see how PER just failed you again?
Nobody was talking about PER. Citing someones statistics per minute is not the same thing as the stat PER. More reading, less yapping.
"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
by olympicmike on Dec 1, 2009 3:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey smart guy..
Read up, it was a reply originaly to Sleepy’s PER comment.
But ya yapping.
by sjboy on Dec 1, 2009 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Hey smart guy? Sleepy never referenced PER. He referenced the standard stats “per 36 minutes played”. Try reading it again. Keep going until it makes sense to you…
"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
by olympicmike on Dec 1, 2009 3:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats what I meant
What the heck is your problem?
No one talks basketball anymore in here. Everyone just wants to argue. Jeeezzzzzz
“MY INTERNET SMARTS ARE BIGGER THEN YOURS”.
Stay on topic. Goodness…
by sjboy on Dec 1, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok if he is just a scorer, just this black hole… then how come he is going to get a max contract?
Haha. You have much to learn, grasshopper.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 1, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok Please write this down
Im going to shove these words down your throat when he gets it.
If you think Amar’e Stoudemire cant get a max contract but Josh Smith and Elton Brand got it… yeah much to learn. You’re so completely clueless.
You know what? Why am I even argueing with you. You’re just a troller who just argues instead of talking basketball. You’re not even on my level.
by sjboy on Dec 1, 2009 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll elaborate. I think Amare probably will get a max contract, because there are many general managers who vastly overestimate the effect offense has on a teams’ win totals and vastly underestimate the effect rebounding, defense, and teamwork has.
It’s backwards logic to use the fact that Amare’s likely to get a max contract as proof of his value. I’m pretty sure Amare will get a max contract (or close to it), and I’m even more sure whoever gives him one is going to end up regretting it.
Because you seem so frightened of numbers, let me attach this Amare anecdote from a recent Bill Simmons interview in the New Yorker.
I think the next revolution will be more chemistry-based: Teams valuing teamwork and personality more than ever and putting some real thought into how to build a true team. We got a glimpse of this last winter when Phoenix shopped Amare Stoudemire and nobody really wanted him. Why? Because he’s a pain in the ass. He’s not a bad guy, but he’s a me-first prima donna who doesn’t care about defense or making teammates better. Teams are starting to realize, "These guys make me better on paper, but I can’t win titles with them." That will be the most fascinating subplot going forward—a new method for evaluating players that doesn’t have as much to do with statistics.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 1, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's sign Bill Russell!
I dont know what facts I was ignoring…. here is fact… he is a multi-time allstar, olympian, 1st team all NBA, 20/10 errr 9 guy pretty much for his career, and Maggette has never been an allstar or anything I just listen.
That’s all good, but it’s nothing compared to what Bill Russell did: 5-time MVP, 12-time All Star, gold medalist, and member of 11 NBA championship team. Facts!
by Ray of Lite on Dec 1, 2009 11:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
MB your response to sjboy’s rant is hysterical! It just proves the gaping hole between those who understand basketball strategy and those who are stat mongers.
by VERY VERY BUSY on Dec 2, 2009 10:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know … in the case of Amare, it seems like the main selling points are in fact statistical: specifically, his shooting percentage and PPG (since by no other statistical measure is he anything special). Conversely, plenty of “people who understand basketball strategy” seem to be turned off by him, nice-looking scoring numbers notwithstanding. Reposting the Simmons / New Yorker clip from above:
Phoenix shopped Amare Stoudemire and nobody really wanted him. Why? Because he’s a pain in the ass. He’s not a bad guy, but he’s a me-first prima donna who doesn’t care about defense or making teammates better. Teams are starting to realize, “These guys make me better on paper, but I can’t win titles with them.” That will be the most fascinating subplot going forward—a new method for evaluating players that doesn’t have as much to do with statistics.
Then again, we’re dealing here with an “opposing voice” who (1) invents facts to suit his arguments (“without Amare they don’t make the playoffs”, e.g.); (2) brings in straw men to distort opposing viewpoints (“PER,” e.g.); and (3) seems to see nothing particularly ironic about hyping the MVP credentials of Amare Stoudemire while at the same time, in another thread, dissing LeBron James, specifically because of his poor passing skills.
In other words, there’s not much to see here at all, other than a whole lot of silliness…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 2, 2009 2:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure I understand what this comment is trying to say…
On the one hand, I could interpret it as you thinking I don’t understand basketball strategy simply because I see a need to use facts to back up opinions….but no, couldn’t be that. Nobody would ever suggest i don’t understand basketball strategy. :)
So on the other hand, you could be saying you see a need to bridge the gap between one side simply quoting statistics and the other side who throws out ridiculous claims with nothing to back it up….
Hmmmm……..to sort of bridge that divide, here we go:
Once you double he can pass the ball efficiently
Yes, someone like Tim Duncan helps his team very much by drawing a double and being able to pass well out of it. Shaq used to be excellent at this. What do these guys have in common, that Amare doesn’t share…the fact that they don’t rank at the bottom of the league in assists? On one hand we have an opinion: Amare passes efficiently. On the other we have a fact that directly contradicts this opinion: Amare doesn’t rack up assists. Not once in his whole career has he averaged as much as 2 assists every 36 minutes. Heck, even Zach Randolph averages 2 assists every 36 minutes. Amare is about as good a passer as Al Jefferson….
Also, you can run a LEGIT pick N roll with him, something currently we cannot do, because pretty much none of our bigs can step out and hit a jumper.
Hmm…this doesn’t even make sense. If you’re running a pick and roll correctly, the picker should not shoot a jumper. Ever. If he does, there is no “roll”. You want to see a proper pick and roll executed? Watch Tyson Chandler and Chris Paul – there’s a reason Chandler had twice as many alley-oop dunks as the second highest person in the league. Big man shooting at the rim > anyone taking a long 2 point jump shot. By the way, Biedrins is pretty good at the pick and roll. He’s quick enough to slip well if they overplay, he has great hands, and he’s a great finisher. His 60% career TS% isn’t an accident – he doesn’t need to shoot jumpers, he catches and finishes with the best of them when he’s open on the pick and roll. By the way, Amare shooting jumpers is pretty unlikely to match Biedrins 60% TS%.
This means he is a threat on a fast break EVERY SINGLE time, which means the other team’s center is going to be GASSED.
Sure, this could be a fair point. But we already have Biedrins, Randolph, and Wright (when they’re healthy). They might not be quite on Amare’s level, but all three run the court very well. We’re not going to see much additional benefit here from Amare being on the floor. Also keep in mind we often have had someone like Maggette playing the 4 – Amare’s a freak athlete, but he’s not going to be any more of a threat than Maggette, a good athlete himself, and more importantly, a 3.
He is a good rebounder
At various points in his younger days he was a decent rebounder. Those points are long gone. He now gets a very, very, very small amount of rebounds. Maybe it’s effort/motivation, maybe some of it is scheme, but he doesn’t rebound even an average amount for either of the last two coaches, no matter what position he’s playing or role they have him in or personnel he’s teamed with. Right now, Amare Stoudemire is a bad rebounder. If you want to make a case he’s not, go for it, I’ll listen – but the burden of proof is now on you, since I can show you he’s currently a bad rebounder.
He is a good team defender, thats why he gets in foul trouble, much like Andris
Except that…well, he’s not a good team defender. Frankly, he doesn’t do much defense in general, he doesn’t really get into bad foul trouble, because he isn’t playing D. Again, just to actually back an opinion up with facts that support it (what a concept, right?), Amare doesn’t block very many shots. He barely blocks more than 1 shot every 36 minutes.
30pts, and 14reb a night EASILY, if not 6 assists JUST FROM MORROW
30 points? Sure, why not, he’s a very good scorer. 14 rebounds? That would make him one of the very best rebounders in the NBA. He has never even been close to that kind of player at any point in time, and lately, he’s been getting half that. Again, burden of proof to come up with a way for him to double his rebounds is on you. 6 assists? Guy has never even averaged 2 assists per 36. That’s a fact, and it very much contradicts this ridiculous opinion. Funny how he can play on a team with a bunch of 3 point shooters (Nash, JRich, Barbosa, Bell was on the team for a while last year, Frye and Dudley have been hitting so far this year)…and yet he doesn’t rack up any assists.
Notice the basic structure – present an opinion, give examples/facts/theories to back it up. I hope that helps bridge the gap for you. :)
by Missing Barry on Dec 2, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well written and you actually talked B-Ball Yayyy!!
J/k, usually when I venture to GSOM it’s a lot of stat throwing, yet when you ask a “basketball” question people respond with more stats, most of the time because they’ve only seen the player in question when they play the Warriors.
FYI you don’t “need” a big that can shoot to run the pick and roll effectivley (Andris), but it is far more potent when the defender has to react, rather than just make sure he’s in front of his man.
Also Andris is the only one of the 3 that we know for sure that can be effective on the fast break. Wright hasen’t played enough to be able to tell and Randolph is a loose cannon just standing still.
by VERY VERY BUSY on Dec 2, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely fair points on all accounts. I think a lot of the time when you get into arguments it’s just easier to cite stats – they are actual facts so that counts for something, and it avoids just arguing over opinions with no real way to convince someone of your opinion, you know? Like if someone says “Amare makes his teammates better” and another person says “Amare is a black hole”….the only real arguments at that point is to use the stats to try to make your case….and sometimes people just skip straight to the stats part, so I so where you’re coming from.
It’s also the internet so naturally if someone comes in with opinions they don’t agree with (and don’t provide a real argument why they have such an opinion)…a lot of people are just going to jump all over it and dismiss it, and stats is the convenient way to do this. Just the nature of the internet, I guess, I’ve come to accept it cause there doesn’t seem to be much you can do about it….
Anyways, when I first started posting here over the summer or late spring or whatever, I also thought a lot of posters weren’t very knowledgeable on this stuff, but the more I’ve learned in conversations with them and the more familiar I’ve become with their arguments and what not, the more I’ve realized there is a lot more knowledge here than I initially thought, if that means anything to you.
by Missing Barry on Dec 2, 2009 6:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well put
Just wanted to put in my 2 cents on the whole Amar’e discussion. People are so quick to forget Amar’es impact when he was healthy, the Suns were the shizzle and IMO could have won it all in the run and gun. However there was a man by the name of Tim Duncan on the Spurs who is to the Suns what Jordan was to the Jazz in the Finals. As awesome as the Jazz were, Malone wont be remembered in the same way as Duncan. What does this have to do with Amar’e? Everything because if the Suns had won a championship, people would not doubt him as much as they do now, even with the very same stats he was putting up.
Unfortunetly I haven’t watched any Phoenix games yet this year, so I’m not sure how he’s doing. However we need a big like New Jersey needs a win, and Amar’e was great for the suns in a very similar system. I mean we’re putting up 100+ points per game and we have no legit scoring big man! Add Amar’e, Bosh, Boozer or any available big man, make them play even a smidge of D (which would be much easier if we can keep Andris) and we’ll be in good shape.
by VERY VERY BUSY on Dec 3, 2009 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They also returned to an uptempo offense and got rid of Shaq, both which have improved the team’s success.
by gobigg415 on Dec 1, 2009 6:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They played 53 games with Amar’e last season. They were 30-23 with him and 16-13 without him — not a huge difference. So far this season, his sad -3.0 plus-minus (-0.6 simple rating) gives him the distinction of being the single least valuable rotation player on the Suns, trailing Nash (who’s always beaten him by this measure), Richardson, Barbosa, Frye, Dudley and Hill.
You prefer “per game” numbers to per 36? OK then: 6.9 rebounds, 1.1 assists, 1.2 blocks, and 2.8 turnovers per game (in 34.2 minutes). That’s below-average for an NBA starting PF, let alone a guy many fans on this site seem to want to lock in to a max-type deal for till the end of time. And the “he’s asked to do different things” argument is totally weak. When Channing Freaking Frye is your other big, you’re expected to rebound the ball and defend the rim at a passable level. Amare’s boarding has dropped off from his alarmingly low rate last season. His total rebound percentage, which adjusts for pace, is currently 11.4%, worse than Maggs’. And naturally, he still doesn’t pass or play defense. Further, lately he seems to have been taking advantage of his 14 minutes a night on the bench to tweet, which only furthers the general impression of him as a bit of a headcase, or at least a space cadet.
Yes, he’s still a very, very efficient scorer — and that’s increasingly all he is. Sound anything like a muscle-bound SF we know? As MB points out below, the biggest reason for the Suns’ success, this year and in previous years, has been Steve Nash. Secondarily, old friend Jason Richardson has been playing really well this season: shooting lights out, rebounding really well, and taking care of the ball. Thirdly, the Suns’ hot start is likely a bit of mirage. When your best player is is 36 and neither of your two “bigs” is pulling even 7 rebounds a game, you’re not exactly making the Lakers quake in their boots.
At a reasonable salary (say <$10M or so), Stoudemire’s shooting efficiency makes a nice piece on a decent team; but he’s never really looked like a first banana, franchise type guy, and with his perpetually crappy defense and recent drop in plus-minus and rebounding, I’m not sure he’s even a decent second banana. Do people really want to go all-in (in terms of salary committed or talent traded) on a third banana who doesn’t play defense or rebound his position even adequately?
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 30, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ps
I have to ask: you do realize the “per” in “per 36” is simply from the Latin for “for,” right? The way you capitalized it makes me worry that you think it has it something to do with Hollinger’s PER (Player Efficiency Rating). As it is, all it does is indicate a simple rate by specifying a time period — similar to ERA, batting average, yards per catch, MPH, MPG, etc. Just a very basic way of comparing apples to apples. I don’t get the “WebMB” connection at all.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 30, 2009 12:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have to take into account
Those 30 wins and 23 loses was the toughest part of their schedule, they were playing with a POS coach as well, and the 16 – 13 they were playing the run N gun system.
This is yet ANOTHER perfect example on how stats are VERY misleading.
by sjboy on Nov 30, 2009 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Those 30 wins and 23 loses [sic] was the toughest part of their schedule
Care to back this up with statistics (opponents’ W-L, e.g.), or would that would be beneath you? I mean, I know how much more fun it is to yell your assertions in ALL CAPS than to support them with actual evidence…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 30, 2009 8:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also....
He has always had crappy defenders around him, so in today’s NBA its really rough to be a good defender…. on your own, especially as a big guy, because you just end up getting in foul trouble in the first 4 minutes, and will have your minutes cut in half. (Amar’e went through this early in his career. See Greg Oden as well for further evidence. His team is not stellar at team D, and he is their best. When he was in the game, we (warriors game 2 fridays ago) were getting owned, we got him out of the game, and we smoked them by 20.)
He would be the greatest Warrior of all time if he played in this system. The possibilities with him at 5 are RIDICULOUSLY endless. We would finaly have a legit post player, who can run with Monta Ellis. NO ONE ELSE IN THE LEAGUE HAS THAT SIZE AND SOFT TOUCH. NO ONE.
So while you can look at stats, I look at games and how he impacts them. Just him on the court F’s up the opponent’s defense ROYALY.
by sjboy on Nov 30, 2009 5:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
See Greg Oden as well for further evidence.
Yes, Greg Oden is evidence of a big man who can actually rebound, play defense, and defend the rim. Amare Stoudemire is not.
He would be the greatest Warrior of all time if he played in this system.
LOL.

[Lots of shouting in all caps]
Dude. Do you actually think that makes your points more persuasive? I know I’m not the only one on this site who tends to take people’s opinions much less seriously when they’re shouting.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 30, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The louder you are, the more right you are. Sigh, you have much to learn.
by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad NO ONE REMEMBERS HIM AS A WARRIOR. Oh and yes I love caps to state my point when you internet tough guys just make yourselves look even more retarded with your combatative 1 liners.
Clearly I was just exagerating to make a point that he would be very very good. Of course in your internet tough guy attitude you just took that and ran with it, and of course commented 0 on the actual basketball facts like drawing a double team.
Its funny your name is Sleepy, because you must sleep through most of the text here, because if you were to actually read it you might learn something.
Then again this site is not exactly glorious when it comes to BBall knowledge, so I guess I shouldnt expect any less.
How long before another trade Monta post? lol
by sjboy on Dec 1, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
Oh and yes I love caps to state my point when you internet tough guys just make yourselves look even more retarded with your combatative 1 liners.
You seem to have the most combative attitude in this discussion. Do you find it threatening when people ask you to back up your opinions with some evidence?
"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
by olympicmike on Dec 1, 2009 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NO ONE ASKED YOU, TOUGH GUY.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 1, 2009 4:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Listen, if you want to counsel me Mr. Olympic send me a private message. Stop trying to be Mr. Cool Guy by derailing the LIVING DAYLIGHTS out of this post.
Oh wait, then you would have nothing to do all day.
by sjboy on Dec 1, 2009 4:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Psst, dude…
Here’s a private message (and it actually is kinda private since this diary is now off the front page):
Take. a. chill. pill.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Dec 1, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Private message?
No problem.
"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
by olympicmike on Dec 1, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
drawing a double team.
Drawing a double team is good. See: Duncan, Tim. It opens up the offense for everyone else and helps them get involved and be more effective. The difference is, Duncan is unselfish and a good passer. Amare is not. That is why Amare ranks at the very bottom in the NBA in assists. Now, as I’ve said before, Amare is one of the best scorers in the NBA – his combination of volume and efficiency is very, very good, so when he shoots, it is a good thing. Don’t twist that into “Amare makes his teammates better”, though, because there’s no evidence he effectively does anything like that. Steve Nash makes the other Suns better, Stoudemire simply scores.
Also, at some point you said something along the lines of Stoudemire would get 15 rebounds a game. You’re basically saying a guy who doesn’t get rebounds now with Gentry as the coach, didn’t rebound before with Porter as the coach, was a decent but by no means huge rebounder before when D’Antoni was the coach, didn’t rebound when Shaq was on the floor, didn’t rebound when Shaq wasn’t on the floor, doesn’t rebound when he plays C, doesn’t rebound when he plays PF….in no situation does Amare Stoudemire grab a lot of rebounds. I don’t see what possible evidence you have that all of a sudden he’d be the best rebounder in the NBA.
How long before another trade Monta post?
You’d have to take that up with the people that made the trade Monta posts. I don’t think you’ll find any of those people in this conversation…
by Missing Barry on Dec 2, 2009 8:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather lose Anthony Randolph than him!
Huh? We can’t win games if we must depend on morrow making 6 three’s per game. We need the bigs and we need a post up game to be consistent winners. Morrow is great when he’s hot but no so much when he’s not. Rudolf can be a better fulltime player cause he don’t have to get hot to do the stuff that wins games, all he needs to do is play steady ball.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
We can rely on Morrow to hit about 50% of his 3’s, particularly if he gets the open looks he got last night, and continues to work on moving out of the way of the closeout (which he did beautifully last night). When he gets a better drive game going, his percentage might even go up.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know no one in the history of the NBA has ever shot even 46% from 3’s for their career, right?
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t know that, but it doesn’t diminish my faith in Morrow in the least
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 2:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t know that, but it doesn’t diminish my faith in Morrow in the least
You know there’s no Santa Claus right?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Morrow would cross Santa over at the top of the key, fake the dish to Randolph, stroke the J, AND get the foul call
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Santa may be out of shape...
but he is magic. He does things that are physically impossible. I’d happily sign him to a 10-day contract and see what we got.
by toddaverth on Nov 30, 2009 3:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Many of the old-timers would have averaged 50% from 3
If the 3-point line had existed in their day.
by Aliengames on Dec 1, 2009 5:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What makes you think that? Do you think the defense is better now, or the shooters are worse or something?
by Missing Barry on Dec 2, 2009 8:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
The comment seems pretty strange, especially when you consider that the first few years of the 3pt line the 3pt shooting percentages were pretty bad IIRC.
"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
by olympicmike on Dec 2, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
dude
all i heard was how much progress randolph made and what not this offseason and how great he is. I was expecting him to look like a basketball player out there. He doesn’t. He looks like crap. GREAT potential, but damn he’s gotta show us something. He looks really awesome when he catches the ball under the rim wide open and can get up and cock it back, but offensively i havent seen much else from him. I will give him props on his defense.
by Agent Zero on Nov 26, 2009 6:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
plenty of minutes to go around in a 3 guard rotation, especially if he can pick up a few at SF. I don’t think determining a defined future role is all that important right now.
Thing A
by sam23 on Nov 25, 2009 3:33 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
This. What’s the rush to find a role? Have you seen how injuries pile up for us? Vlad will only be around for one more year. Azubuike may only be around for one more year. Let’s keep Morrow around, things will work themselves out, that’s all we really need to know right now. There are minutes to go around – furthermore, a wing is a wing, so it doesn’t really matter whether he’s at the 2 or 3….it’s just not a big deal.
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 7:01 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I generally agree that a wing is a wing, but it does seem to me that Morrow has better luck defending threes, as he struggles to keep up with quicker players. While you’re right that there’s no point in locking down his position now, my guess is that he’ll eventually be a small forward.
by onlxn on Nov 25, 2009 9:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess my thoughts on a wing is a wing, is even if Morrow might matchup better, on average, against 3’s, that’s fine, we can just have our other wing guard their 2…
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 10:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
.685
That’s Anthony Morrow’s TS% right now. Career .606. I’m beginning to think “best shooter in the NBA” is not at all hyperbole (though I’m not sure it needs the “by far.”)
By way of comparison…
Jordan .568 career
Kobe .558 career
Allen .575 career
Kapono (to throw out a three-point specialist often likened to Morrow) .542 career
Morrow’s also leading all Warrior regulars in plus-minus (+16.3, simple rating +5.4), after doing the same last season.
I’m starting to think this fellow needs to be our starting small forward, his deficiencies in other areas notwithstanding. A 1-2-3 of Curry-Monta-Morrow (i.e. Run-EMC) is bordering on non-guardable. Throw in a couple of long, rebounding fools at 4-5 (AR and AB, e.g.) and we could be in business.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 5:00 AM PST reply actions 3 recs
The sample does keep getting bigger, can’t deny that…
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 7:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I mean, I think “three point marksman only” is still a pretty apt description, so long as we realize that Morrow, increasingly, is a “Three Point Marksman” in the same way that Dennis Rodman was a “Rebounder.” That level of excellence, even if it’s only in one area, often finds its way into highly effective starting lineups. At the very least, as the true shooting and plus-minus evidence mounts, it’s going to be hard to deny him 30-35 minutes a night.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 7:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True. And hell, I’m not totally convinced that “three point marksman only” is Morrow’s fate. He was used in precisely that fashion to start the season, and you could tell that he was just too locked in on letting it fly, at the expense of everything else. His first five games, per 36 minutes:
17.2 points (.480 FG% .529 3P%), 3.6 rebounds, 0.5 assists, 1.5 turnovers, 0.3 steals
That’s an absurdly one-dimensional line. As nice as the threes were, this was not a good set of performances from Morrow… certainly not a level of play that suggested he merited a starting role. Since the Minnesota game, though, he seems to have relaxed. I don’t know if Nellie loosened the reins on Morrow’s responsibilities, or if Jack’s subtraction helped, or if consistent minutes have done it, or if Morrow just stopped trying to chase his summer league performance and focused on playing basketball, but in the last eight games he’s been a different player. Per 36:
13.9 points (.535 FG%, .568 3P%), 5.1 rebounds, 2.0 assists, 1.3 turnovers, 1.8 steals
He’s shooting less often but even more efficiently, he’s rebounding dramatically more, he’s now passing a bit without any increase in his turnover rate, and he’s gotten in on the ball-hawking act with Monta and Curry. That is not the line of a one-dimensional player. And he sure looked anything but one-dimensional last night. Small sample size, sure, but I think it’s premature to typecast him as a one-tool guy. He’s still figuring some things out.
by onlxn on Nov 25, 2009 10:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
how great was that help defense he gave on Dirk last night early in the game when he swooped in from the weakside and picked it clean…C L E A N!!!!
Our lineup is coming together with a group of players who do different things well, which is the mark of a good team. We still need a lockdown perimeter defender to take some defensive pressure off the EMC crew, but it definetely looks good. Really too bad that Buike and Wright are out because they would give us a major boost.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so long as we realize that Morrow, increasingly, is a "Three Point Marksman" in the same way that Dennis Rodman was a "Rebounder."
The bigger the sample gets, the more I’m willing to accept that Morrow really is that good of a shooter, what can I say. Every day your view is looking a bit more correct.
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The bigger the sample gets, the more I’m willing to accept that Morrow really is that good of a shooter,
But there’s more to the game than just shooting, I’d take MJ’s .500 shooting over More-O’s .600 shooting everyday.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You’d take Jordan over Morrow? No way. That’s even wackier than your “LeBron is better than Curry” and “Shaq is better than Biedrins” arguments… ;-P
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 11:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s even wackier than your "LeBron is better than Curry" and "Shaq is better than Biedrins" arguments… ;-P
some people don’t like the truth.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Every day your view is looking a bit more correct.
Shhhh. Now I’m starting to worry we might be inviting bad karma. Let’s try to remain skeptical, or at least knock on wood…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok see my above comment to superfishal.
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 2:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Supa to you
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I mean, I think "three point marksman only" is still a pretty apt description, so long as we realize that Morrow, increasingly, is a "Three Point Marksman" in the same way that Dennis Rodman was a "Rebounder."
I agree with the point youre making, but Rodman was one hell of a defensive player too.
Thing A
by sam23 on Nov 25, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, but in fairness, morrow’s got some other skills too. none as good as rodman’s d, but he can rebound well for his position and seems to be improving as a passer.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Nov 28, 2009 1:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My question is how will we guard other teams consistently
if we have Morrow guarding the other teams points(because thats his defensive skill right now) and Monta guarding small forwards.
However, it seems unlikely that most teams in the NBA can guard this lineup of Curry-Ellis-Morrow-Vlad-Randolph. That’s 3 great shooters, one of the best drivers in the league, and the ultimate mismatch at the 5. However, when Biedrins comes back i don’t think its going to work as well as the lineup i suggested above. Moving on,
i don’t know if its just me but, Vlad has been playing excellent ball. He’s playing great team defense, he’s grabbing lots of rebounds, and he is shooting the ball very effectively while running the floor for garbage points. Seems like this deal for Jackson has it’s financial benefits and it has drastically helped this team on the court.
Marco Belinelli's Biggest Fan
by montadaboss on Nov 25, 2009 6:55 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
No point in worrying about where he plays right now
Just get him signed to an extension.
by breaker on Nov 25, 2009 8:36 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Somehow Vlad seems to be an essential element in the Koolaid they are drinking
his movement on the court has been great for his size…
by Only In Fairfax on Nov 25, 2009 9:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Vlad had the quote of the night too when he said “here, anything is possible.” He sounded like a refugee from East Berlin who managed to escape over the wall, which I guess is applicable to someone going from Larry Brown to Don Nelson.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL good observation.
by Rob Kurz blocks Yao Ming on Nov 26, 2009 12:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Morrow is the starting 2, unless matchups allow Curry to start at 2 moving Morrow to 3 spot!
by Oakland2NYC on Nov 25, 2009 10:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
pretty much hit it right on the head
Morrow at the 3 only if matchups allow us. I sure wouldn’t want to see him guarding certain SF’s such as Lebron, Carmelo, Odom, or Josh Smith. Those guys are just too strong for Morrow.
"We Deserve"
by YaHeard on Nov 25, 2009 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So you put the other wing on them, it’s not that difficult of a concept. The SG doesn’t have to guard the other teams shooting guard, the SF doesn’t necessarily have to guard the other teams SF, etc…
by Missing Barry on Nov 27, 2009 7:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it doesn't really matter if morrow is 2 or 3 IF
we have 2 ball handlers on court. Be it curry, ellis or ellis and a SF w/ handles or whatever.
when we play Ellis/Curry w/ Buike and Morrow together for extended minutes our passing/ball handling tends to suffer
by tafkasam on Nov 25, 2009 10:10 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Morrow is an essential piece
To me, Morrow should be in the starting lineup. Any time you have one of the premier penetrating/slashing guards in the league (Ellis) you need to have a player like Morrow to keep the help defense out of the lane. I mean, dude makes over 50 percent from three. He did it last year and he’s done it so far this year. That is an absurdly high percentage, and you have to find a way to not only get him minutes, but look for him on offense. Even if he isn’t the greatest defender, on most nights he will outscore his man because he shoots so well.
by LakerFan24 on Nov 25, 2009 10:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Since when is Vlad a SG/SF?
Even in a different system he is still a big
by savagebenx2 on Nov 25, 2009 12:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I always thought of Vlad as a 3 who could play some 4
And on the Warriors he’ll be playing a lot of 4
Jeremy was safe. He jumped over the tag.
by mrrickyg on Nov 25, 2009 12:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I always thought of him as a 4 who was a horrible rebounder. I dont like the idea of matching him up against wings.
Thing A
by sam23 on Nov 25, 2009 1:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Playing with other bigs who have great hands like Randolph and Biedrins, simply the fact that he is tall and can bat the ball up will be a useful tool for us in terms of gaining a rebounding edge.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 1:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, I’m not worried. Not many teams have 2 good offensive wings, so as long as he’s not the one covering their better wing, we should be fine. It takes away some flexibility to put in a good defensive player next to Ellis, but oh well, the point is it’s still a problem that can be solved.
by Missing Barry on Nov 25, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t think of more than a handful of wings in the NBA, good offensively or not, that I’d feel comfortable having VladRad try to defend for extended stretches.
Thing A
by sam23 on Nov 25, 2009 6:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re overestimating what a lot of wings in this league are capable of. I wouldn’t mind having him guard a Travis Outlaw, or Shane Battier, or Jason Kapono, or the tons of other wings that really aren’t much of a threat offensively beyond shooting. It’s not that difficult to guard a shooter.
by Missing Barry on Nov 27, 2009 7:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant him as a SF.
SG/SF was meant for most of the other guys like Buike etc
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
by dubzfan on Nov 25, 2009 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I see absolutely nothing wrong with Morrow coming off the bench. He can still get significant minutes with our current lineup.
OF COURSE, depending on the team, he could start at SG OR SF.
Bottom line for me is that Morrow can and will be effective however he is played.
I see nothing wrong with:
PG: Curry/Monta/CJ
SG: Monta/Ammo/Curry
SF: Buike/Ammo/Magette
PF: Randolph/Radman/Turiaf/BW?
C: Beans/Truiaf/Hunter
by FishStix on Nov 25, 2009 12:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure CJ will be gone next year. He has proven that he can score well enough to warrant heavier minutes on another team. With Ellis and Curry ahead of him, he will never get heavy burn with us. Buike might opt out, although his injury might actually be a good thing for us in that it makes it easier to keep him. I really don’t see us keeping both of these guys and we may lose them both, but if it comes down to a choice, it’s pretty clear Buike is the guy we want because he is a better defender and rebounder.
In ascending order from one to five:
Curry
Ellis
Morrow
Buike
Maggs
Radman
Randolph
BWright
Turiaf
Biedrins
Hunter…?
Radman and Turiaf, and to a lesser extent Maggette, do not need heavy minutes to be successful, so I think a 10-man rotation can actually work with this group.
Morrow and Buike will need to improve their perimeter defense and prove they can guard 2’s and faster 3’s in order for this group not to need further tweaking.
Also, BWright/Randolph/Biedrins need to develop some semblance of a post-up game in order to at least have the option to go down low occasionally when our shots aren’t falling.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
by Supafishal on Nov 25, 2009 3:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Spacing
Its a key philosophy in offensive basketball and you can create it in a variety of ways. The way this current warriors team is set up without a dominant low post big man, the warriors have to use Guard penetration.
The lucky thing for the warriors is that they have one of the best penetrators in the league in Monta Ellis. He is by far the best player on the squad. He is not the greatest passer in the world, but he can drive and finish or drive and kick which when you have Ammo, Curry, and Vlad man sitting on the wing makes teams think twice about coming and doubling. There was multiple times where the lay ups Monta hit were just one on one situation because help last night was scared of leaving their man. Ammo is one of the best shooters in the league and needs to be on the court to create this spacing. I also he plays much better when he starts than when he comes off the bench. He seems more confident in his game.
The line up should be until healthy….
PG Curry
SG Ellis
SF Ammo
PF Vlad
C Randolph
When healthy…basically a line up that will never happen
PG Curry
SG Ellis
SFAmmo
PF Randolph
C Biedrins
Bench of Maggette, Buike, Vlad, Ronny, CJ as the key five off the bench
That is a solid NBA Team
by Oracle Junkie on Nov 25, 2009 2:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
When healthy…basically a line up that will never happen
Where’s BrokenWing in your grand scheme?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Nov 25, 2009 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Morrow as a 3?
Seriously? Just because he’s been our 3 for the last two games, and we happen to have won those two games, does not mean he’s our future 3. He’s a skinny 6’5" guy for crying out loud.
What happens when we play teams that have strong 3’s that can post up and really get after rebounds? Morrow at the 3 simply isn’t going to work. I think he’s one of the best players on the team, but his future at the 3 only exposes all of his weaknesses.
He’s best at the 2. His footspeed, handles and passing aren’t ideal for a shooting guard but he more than makes up for it with his shooting stroke, rebounding ability, and defensive effort. I see a future 3-guard rotation of Curry/Morrow/Ellis sharing PG/SG.
"We Deserve"
by YaHeard on Nov 25, 2009 4:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Morrow is a good player to have come off your bench, but I don’t see him as a long time answer in the starting rotation.
Eventually other teams are going to make more of an effort to get in his face and make sure he does not get as many open looks as he has been receiving. He does benefit from Curry and Ellis being able to find him out on the perimeter when they are driving, but if teams keep getting burned, eventually they are going to adjust their defense accordingly.
by ajtrinc on Nov 25, 2009 5:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thats my point
If teams keep getting burned by a great three point shooter, maybe the best in the league they have to stay on him. This opens up lanes to the hoop for Curry and Ellis which is what the warriors need. Most defensive schemes are set up to help on the driver and then close out on the shooter if Ammo shoots like this, it makes other teams rethink there defensive strategy. It is always better to make teams adjust to you than the other way around. And finally how many threes in the NBA actually post up generally a wing is a wing.
by Oracle Junkie on Nov 25, 2009 5:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Your right, it can open up the lanes for Curry and Morrow, but I don’t see it hampering another team that much as it is more important for them to have their bigs clogging the lanes than a guard or a small forward.
by ajtrinc on Nov 26, 2009 12:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Eventually other teams are going to make more of an effort to get in his face and make sure he does not get as many open looks as he has been receiving.
If they haven’t already realized they need to do this with Morrow, what makes you believe they’ll realize it in the future? Seriously, NBA teams aren’t idiots, they’ve known Morrow needs to be guarded since this time last year…
by Missing Barry on Nov 27, 2009 7:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Morrow shows consistency, teams will start to game plan for him to make sure he does not get open looks. Although he has had a few big games this season, he has tended to be missing from other games.
NBA teams are definatley not idiots, but Morrow has not made himself a priority.
by ajtrinc on Nov 27, 2009 1:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
teams will start to game plan for him to make sure he does not get open looks.
This is a very fundamental aspect of basketball. A high school team tries to deny the other teams’ shooters open shots. Houston was putting Shane Battier on him in the first game this season, to give you an idea of what kind of attention teams are paying Morrow. I think he has tended to be missing because other teams have put better defenders on him.
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 29, 2009 9:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t think he has garnered the respect most think he has around the league of being a consistent threat. Occasionally this season I’ve seen another teams defender pay close attention to Morrow, but for the majority of the season, he has been given a lot of open looks.
When he becomes a consistent 20per then you may see more teams focusing on taking him out of the game.
by ajtrinc on Nov 30, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe we should actually give credit to Don Nelson for that?! No, how dare I suggest such a thing….
Seriously, though, when you lead the NBA in 3PT%, teams notice. Maybe they’re not trying to shut him down as the focal point of their defense (nor should they, he’s not that good), but I guarantee you the pre-game notes let everyone know he’s a shooter, the same way other teams prepare for a guy like Jason Kapono. Teams know he can shoot. There’s no reason to think all of a sudden a lightbulb is going to go off around the league and he’s going to start getting less looks. He’s not going to get played any differently than he already is until he shows he’s more than just a shooter.
by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 2:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, I agree, that is how he is probably seen by other teams, in the Kapono type mold. More of a reason he should be coming off the bench.
by ajtrinc on Nov 30, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok it seems like we haven’t actually been disagreeing then. My bad. I guess I think we can just expect more of the same from him – he’ll still get the open looks that he gets now, but until his game changes dramatically, he’s not going to be contributing anything more than he already does.
by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, you just filled in the blanks to my argument. I think we are on the same page on how other teams see Morrow.
by ajtrinc on Dec 1, 2009 2:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Morrow doesn't rebound enough to be our primary 3
But I don’t think that’s a problem.
My approach would be this. In the long run:
Morrow, Monta, and Curry play the guard spots, getting about equal minutes. This is conditional on both Monta and Curry being able to play the point well enough for this to work, which I wouldn’t bet the farm on, but I’m somewhat optimistic about for a change.
Azubuike and Mags are our 3s. They split time there.
Randolph back up by Wright at the 4. Beans backed up by Turiaf at the 5.
If Wright doesn’t develop, Beans-Turiaf-Randolph should be fine for most games at the big spots, and if Mags fills in a few minutes here and there it’s no big deal. If Randolph ever becomes a three, on the other hand, that might make Mags tradeable, which would be nice.
by Ronaldinho on Nov 25, 2009 6:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Basically agreed with this approach. I don’t think it’s worth getting into much of a debate about whether Morrow’s a 2 or a 3, since in many instances the difference is pretty negligible. I would note that, though he may not quite rebound well enough to be our primary 3, he also doesn’t really pass well enough to be our primary 2. Further, I don’t think he’s quick enough to hang defensively with a lot of two guards, where I do think he’s long and wiry-strong enough to hang with a lot of small forwards.
As a general rule, I would much rather see a 1-2-3 of Curry-Monta-Morrow (all of whom are decent rebounders for their size) than one of Monta-Morrow-Azubuike or Maggs (none of whom has any real passing skills or court vision to speak of). And if you’re actually considering giving minutes at the 3 to Anthony Randolph and his 1 assist per 36 minutes, you run the risk of fielding one of the worst passing starting 5s in the league. For a team that thrives on ball movement, that could be pretty deadly.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Nov 25, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if Morrow needs passing skills ...
until he becomes more than a spot-up jump shooter.
But your point about pairing him and Mags is well taken. I have to assume that improved passing from Randolph is one of the factors that would go into the “if he ever becomes a 3,” as well. :)
by Ronaldinho on Nov 26, 2009 9:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Morrow
I think can be a starting SG if he got stronger, made more plays, and worked on his handles. He’s got the shooting locked down, but if he improves on that, then I could see him on being the Dubs’ starting SG.
by DubsFan408 on Nov 25, 2009 10:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
all we need is lebron
then monta/morrow can be a fine starting back court. someone go post on cav’s blog if they’re interested in maggette + expirings + a draft pick. Hey they gotta clear cap space for free agent class of 2010!
by tafkasam on Nov 25, 2009 11:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
With solid big and playmaker, Morrow should be starter...
We need a solid post presence big and playmaker(s) in our starting lineup for Morrow to be a permanent starter and be most effective. Morrow sniping jumpers will keep solid spacing and keep the defense honest from doubling the bigs. We already have solid playmakers in Steph and Monta. With Turiaf, AR, and Andris being our bigs, none of them have a true solid post game which really limits the rest of the team’s strengths of jump shooting and solid penetration. With a solid big, it makes Curry a better player, Monta having more freedom to get to the lane, and make Morrow that much more valuable as a starter.
by ollieboi8 on Nov 26, 2009 8:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Starting SG
…and not SF, come on Don Nelson geese!
=Gaucho=
by Gaucho! on Nov 30, 2009 10:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Geese

"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
by olympicmike on Nov 30, 2009 2:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Small ball is not dead
Curry / Ellis / Morrow = starting back court… No defense will be able to stop them in a couple years.
by Aliengames on Dec 1, 2009 5:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's our Reggie Miller...
/thread.
by ThermoElectro on Dec 13, 2009 11:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















