Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Post Jackson Trade- Is Monta a budding All-Star? (updated!)

I'll premise this by saying, I don't think Monta will be an all star.  Not because of lack of talent, but more because of the depth of established guards in the west.  Chris Paul and Kobe are likely to be voted in.  Steve Nash and Brandon Roy are near locks and I'm hard pressed to see Monta beating out Deron Williams, Tony Parker, Chauncey Billups or others in a coaches vote. However I want to take a second to reflect upon Monta's numbers in the Post-Young Fella Era.  I realize it's a small sample size, but its definitely something we should monitor

Star-divide

Act_monta_ellis_medium

via www.nba.com

 

Since the trade (in 7 games) Monta has posted:

43.3 MPG, 12-24.5 fg per, 48.8 FG%, 5-16 3pt, 6.3-7.4 ft per game, 84.6 ft%, .551 TS%,  30.7 PPG

3.7 rpg,5.6 apg, 5.1 ToPG, 3.6 steals per

 

(stats updated POST-indiana game... Keep in mind the warriors have played 5 road games in the 7 game span.  6 games against playoff teams, and are 3-4)

First thing that pops out is the turn overs are way to high.  One 11 turn over game in the context of a 6 game average will do that to you.  If we take that game out, his average is 6 apg, 3.6 ToPG.  Still by no means great but starting to get better. When compared with some of the better playmaking 2 guards Monta's 1.67:1 assist to turn over ratio is not as bad as we suspect.  For reference (career averages):

Kobe: 4.6 assists, 2.9 turnovers.  1.58:1 ratio

Dwayne Wade: 6.6 assist, 3.8 turnovers, 1.73:1

Brandon Roy: 5.1 assists, 2.1 turnovers, 2.4:1

Manu Ginobili: 3.6 assists, 2.1 turnovers, 1.7:1

Joe Johnson: 4.4 assists, 2.2 turnovers, 2:1

 

and finally Monta's CAREER Asist:TO: 1.56:1.  Clearly Monta is not in the above players class yet.  But being just 24, and analyzing the numbers, he may not be as far away from being a playmaker as many think.  It's a role he hasn't really been asked to do.  Pre 2008, Baron was the playmaker and he played off ball.  Last season and until recently, Jackson was the man excepted to do so.  Now that Jackson is gone, for lack of a better term, this has become "Monta's Team". We all know Monta will never be a classic point guard.  but with the exception of teams like Phoenix, New Orleans, Utah, very few teams play with one. You can already see the ball movement is improving.  As it continues to grow, I see no reason Monta cannot be our primary playmaker (ball handler, PG, whatever term you want to give it), the way Kobe, Dwayne Wade, and others are for there respective teams.

 

Next thing that jumps out to me is his scoring. 28.6 ppg!  He is shooting 47.6% which is not bad considering the volume of shots he takes.  I don't think he will ever reach the 53% level again until he has another legitimate scorer next to him to take off the pressure.   That being said, he is taking the weight of being "the guy" on a team that is young and scoring almost at will.  The one thing he needs to do to become more efficient is get to the line more often.  He showed it at times he can get to the line 10+ times a game, and for him to truly become an elite scorer in the league thats the one thing I think he needs to be able to do consistently.

Finally the last thing that jumps out to me is the strides Monta is making defensively.  Because of physical limitations, he will never be a lock down defender, but off ball, he is really showing to be a gigantic pest, getting loose balls and lots of steals. 

 

Ultimately, I don't expect Monta to be an all-star this year, however he is showing me he can be a legitimate first or second option guy on a team expected to make the playoffs.  As of right now he doesn't have the players around him to make that happen, but perhaps with the addition of 1 established player, the growth of your young players, and of course the health of our players (particularly our bigs).  Perhaps Monta is becoming the player management hoped he would be when they gave him that contract.  And more so, every day he is showing the contract is not only fair, but perhaps even below market value for the player he can become.

 

Hgg0910_3_02_medium

via www.nba.com

 

Perhaps one day the Warriors won't be advertising opposing teams superstars, but our own!

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

Comment 141 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It could happen

Monta definitely has the tools. A little more work on his defense and point guard IQ is needed, but I’m sure he’s working on that. Getting another offensive threat that can take some of the scoring load off of him is critical for this to happen, though.

Assuming that our idiotic front office can create a healthy environment where:

1) Our players can develop for the better instead of getting frustrated for one reason or another. As much as I believe Nelly is a great coach, I don’t think he is a particularly good fit for this young team anymore…..maybe Avery Johnson? (let it be known that I’d love to be proven wrong on this point)

and

2) Free agents will at least give Golden State thoughtful consideration instead of the cold shoulder that we’ve more or less gotten (refer to our offer to Elton Brand during the time when we let Baron walk….we threw $100+ mill to him, and he politely turned us down because Philly supposedly had a better supporting cast for him).

…then we could get the difference maker (or two) that we need to lift this team up from the cellar. I think that Riley is heading in the right direction for orchestrating deals that got rid of Crawford (classy player, but not what we needed) and Jackson, therefore easing our financial burdens, but he’s got a mountain of work to do yet.

by ryogahibiki on Nov 30, 2009 9:50 AM PST reply actions  

The rest of the fans in the NBA think that Monta is our star and the rest of the team is junk

Although I don’t think it’s that important what everyone else thinks but he’s the ONLY one that I hear about from other fans around the NBA when they’re talking about the Warriors, with the exception of Morrow’s lights out shooting. I don’t know why it’s so hard for Warrior fans to figure out. Monta is a really good basketball player and we don’t give him the respect that he deserves. He’s not a Chris Paul PG and won’t ever really be but he IS our #1 scoring option right now and rightfully so because the guy can score and he can score very well. I would much rather have the ball in Monta’s hands than ANYONE else on our team’s hands in a pressure situation. Realize this and build the team around him. Curry will be a good PG. Monta and Curry have proven that they can play well together. Now full up the front court!

by Throw up the Dub on Nov 30, 2009 10:23 AM PST reply actions  

You forgot Russell Westbrook & Tyreke Evans are going to get consideration if their teams continue to play well.

A team that is tied for the 4th worst record in the NBA (GSW) is going to have zero all-stars no matter how good your stats are (see Kevin Martin, Al Jefferson). going off current playoff positioning:

Nash, Amare
Kobe, Pau, Bynum
Dirk
Melo, Billups
Roy
Duncan
Deron

That’s 11. That 12th spot is probably going to whoever is in that 8th spot at the time or if someone like CP3 gets voted in. Boozer could easily go in instead of Deron if that 12th spot is another guard.

by homer simpson on Nov 30, 2009 10:23 AM PST reply actions  

But 5 players are voted in.

Leaving 7 spots for the players above (minus the starters).

"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald

by WarriorForLife on Nov 30, 2009 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I do like Monta’s increased playmaking, but the problem is two bad things have come with it (one of which you pointed out). Turnovers. 3.5 per 36. That’s not good. Shooting efficiency. Has to improve upon this, he’s been below average this year, he needs to get back to above average. Whether that means choosing to shoot better shots, getting fouled more, shooting more 3’s (assuming he can keep making them at a respectable rate), I’m not sure, but he has to get it up. Also, his ballhandling needs a lot of work. If he can improve it (especially the left hand), that may help cut down on his turnovers, improve his assist rate, and get higher quality shots (raising his TS%).

by Missing Barry on Nov 30, 2009 11:05 AM PST reply actions  

can anyone tell me what his TS% is post-jack?

I dont think its awful. But you’re 100% right. He needs to either shoot 50% or get to line alot more… I think once a viable 2nd scoring option emerges (via trade or developement) his efficiency will go up. Considering he is basically a volume shooter now and our only real means of offense, I’d say he’s scoring pretty efficiently, just seems worse compared to the lofty standards we expect.

Curry’s developement as an additional playmaker will help him. Another player who can create there own shot is needed though… Maybe that can be randolph? More likely was BWright (who is unfortunately hurt). The rest of our players I like but I dont see as guys who can create for themselves…. maybe morrow if he continues to evolve. If he can learn to come off screens better etc. like Ray Allen

by tafkasam on Nov 30, 2009 11:21 AM PST up reply actions  

can anyone tell me what his TS% is post-jack?

The formula is: PTS / (2 * (FGA + 0.44 * FTA))

So going by your numbers… 172 / 2*161 = .534

Now up to .517 on the season. Not exactly world-beating, but then the all-star voters tend to care more about volume than efficiency. I could definitely see Monta getting a nod, especially with Paul and KMart hurt.

Personally, if I were a voter, I’d want to see him get his plus-minus out of the deep red (-24.1, -8.1 simple rating) before even considering him…

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Nov 30, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

interesting....

assuming he got the line 3 more times a game and made them (roughly giving him same efficiency)… .563 which all of a sudden makes him seem to be in kobe (.558), dwade (.564), Broy (.557) category….

I hate comparing him to all these players cause they r (in my opinon) 3 best playmaking nonPGs in nba, but its interesting to see he’s not THAT far off…

Really reaaallly makes me question all the “trade monta for Hinrich” fan posts

by tafkasam on Nov 30, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

why in the HELL

would we want to trade Monta for Hinrich?

by Am22mO on Nov 30, 2009 1:08 PM PST up reply actions  

because people seem to think the grass is always greener when in reality at least half of the time it is not.

by homer simpson on Nov 30, 2009 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Did you notice

When Nellie came back, Monta’s score came down drastically. I wonder why. To be fair to Nellie
Aaron Brooks seem to be faster than any of the GSW guards.

by sadiri on Dec 4, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Is monta as good if not better than some of those guys he is competing with?

easily yes. But he won’t get it. He just won’t. The league will snub us as always and it’s not even clear cut that he should be there. The only way I can see him getting it is if he is up to about 26 ppg and the dubs are at 500

by Agent Zero on Nov 30, 2009 2:46 PM PST reply actions  

+1

But i can’t blame league. You gonna snub Kobe? Broy is leading a top 5 team. Steve Nash is possibly the MVP thus far. Deron Williams is deserving. Tony Parker/CP3 depending on injury deserve to be there too

Anyway my point wasn’t will he make it, but he’s playing like an all-star. I could care less if he goes. I mean i’d like it. It’d be good for him, and for the dubs reputation. but it was more a comment on his form

by tafkasam on Nov 30, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Give it a couple years, when the Warriors might be actually competing for a playoff spot.

Might be kinda hard to snub Monta if he’s producing like he is now on a contending team.

"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald

by WarriorForLife on Nov 30, 2009 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

yes you are correct and I wasn't trying to take anything away from your point

I mean look at him now. He is looking like one of the best scorers in the league!

Of course you’re not going to snub kobe. kobe will start. But if monta continues to play anything like he is now, he should go before Deron williams and tony parker. Don’t forget that he is 2nd in the league in steals! He should go! but he won’t.

by Agent Zero on Nov 30, 2009 9:35 PM PST up reply actions  

monta will definately

play in an all-star game in his career if not more. he’s only gonna get better, and he’s a border-line allstar right now. his assist/turnover will become better. his assists will go up.

by BryanBalla on Nov 30, 2009 6:08 PM PST reply actions  

i agree....

he is entering his prime……but the thing thats holding him back is the team (record) because we get no love around the league…..so people are not gunna vote for him.

by Morrow is wet!!! on Nov 30, 2009 6:28 PM PST reply actions  

Post Jackson trade - different question

… right now, today, who’s better off from the GS-Indy trade?

GS, with a year of We Believe thanks to Harrington & Jax, or Indy with Murphy & Dunleavy?

Just curious what you all would say now …

by hardcore on Nov 30, 2009 8:50 PM PST reply actions  

i don’t think many warriors fans would trade the We Believe year for anything less than a title run. one of the defining moments of my life as a sports fan.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Nov 30, 2009 9:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Both teams are better off than they were

we were going nowhere with murphleavy, they had their share of problems with their guys. We had some great years after the trade, now we are back down to earth on the same level with the pacers I would say. Our guys are younger. Even with the progress dunleavy has made, I still don’t think he is worth the money and I think Murphy is garbage. Their team doesn’t really have upside. None of those guys are going to get better. We have a younger, more athletic core to build around. Granger is very nice, but Monta is lookin better than him now.

by Agent Zero on Nov 30, 2009 9:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Based on the last six games

Other than Kobe and Nash, which guard in the West s playing better than Monta right now? Obviously, he won’t get 40+ each night but if he averages 27-30 pts, 5 assists, 2-3 steals, 5 boards between now and the all star game he needs to get some love!

by tjmax on Nov 30, 2009 10:19 PM PST reply actions  

Changed stats in the article

Also noted we are 3-4 since the trade (5 road games, 6 against playoff teams, all undermanned).

 If we could get a number 2 option w/ monta I’m not convinced this team can’t make playoffs this year in a ‘down’ west (down in the sense that after top 6/7 teams i dont see anyone warriors can’t pass up). but more so if it’s the right peice (not saying a 1 year rental) it could set this team up to be a perennial playoff team and a deep challenger w/ the continued developement of monta and the rest of peices

by tafkasam on Dec 1, 2009 8:44 AM PST reply actions  

like a solid SF or PF?

I love Randolph’s potential but we are weak at the forward spots right now. We need a Brandon Bass, Paul Millsap, Scola type. Or, a smart, pass first defensive small forward like Shane Battier or Tayshaun Prince. we need smarts, defense and experience at the forward spot. Buike might have been that guy but he’s out and he’s more of a scorer.
I think playoffs could happen with one of the guys above. How much are we willing to trade our future away (Morrow, Randolph, Curry) to get one of the above? As much as I love these three guys – we’d need to give up at least one for the above names.

by tjmax on Dec 1, 2009 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't know that Tashaun or Battier would get us into the playoffs...

They would certainly 100% help us. For those two I wouldn’t give much, because of age/not a monster effect. Tayshaun might not take more than buike + speedy though, depending on Dumars summer plans.

I was speaking more to a second legitimate offensive weapon (one w/ D is a plus) Yeah I love Morrow, but he’s a guy who needs to play off players, get open looks. He is not a 2nd option.

Scola is a free agent BTW, and he’s top of my list of wants. We’d need to clear more cap room though. Anyone got an idea of what type of deal he’ll receive? With a shrinking cap and a recession most mid level guys (aka good players but not max money types) seem to be taking less per year. That being said, once some teams who cleared massive space lose out on the big name guys, i’m not convinced someone doesn’t throw a big (overpay) deal at second teir bigs like scola… The guys so efficient, great mid range jumper and such a bull dog on defense he’d rub off…. Sadly I doubt houston lets him go. They don’t seem to be big into getting a star free agent.

by tafkasam on Dec 1, 2009 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Why not Brandon Bass?

i love the way he plays – and he’s a warriors killer. Since Boozer is playing great maybe they see either bass or kirelinko as expendable?

by tjmax on Dec 1, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions  

bass plays for orlando

You mean millsap? They love Millsap soo much they matched portland gigantic front loaded offer (putting utah heavy in luxury tax)

They will let boozer walk in offseason and millsap will be #1 PF for them .

by tafkasam on Dec 1, 2009 11:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Brandon Bass is not very good.

by Missing Barry on Dec 1, 2009 11:52 AM PST up reply actions  

He’s a very average player, but that’s an upgrade for us at PF. He’s an ok rebounder (not a beast by any means) and a reasonably good producer on offense — low to moderate volume, moderately good efficiency. If we expect much out of him (perhaps due to the Mark Portugal syndrome) we’ll be disappointed. If we expect a ‘meh’ PF, he’d probably meet those expectations.

by jae on Dec 1, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh, it’s only an upgrade because our big men are hurt. The only one of our big men he might be better than is Turiaf. (And yes, it was suggested we should expect much out of him, so I guess I was overreacting a little to make a point against that…)

by Missing Barry on Dec 1, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Gortat is somewhat interesting to me. Do either of you guys know much about him. His talent/Availability? I know the magic have showed interest in C.J before and now with nelson down it makes some sense for them. The numbers dont work for a straight up deal and neither of them can be traded at this exact moment but does C.J + speedy for gortat sound realistic? I would assume no, but if so I would jump at that idea.

by MO-ped MO-problems on Dec 1, 2009 1:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Gortat, I think he’s a good player. Good rebounder, good defender, efficient on offense (doesn’t score much, but probably only takes good shots so it’s ok). The Magic matched an offer to him this past offseason if I’m not mistaken (for around 5 years $30M or so I think?), so I think it’s probably fair to think they do like him. With Bass, Lewis, Anderson, Howard, and, of course, FOYLE!, it doesn’t seem to me they necessarily need him if they can upgrade somewhere else, not sure if we can give them the upgrade they’d be looking for, though. Jason Williams seems to be capable as the backup PG they were looking for, too…

by Missing Barry on Dec 1, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

The Magic matched an offer, indicating they both like him and he has a year’s veto power on any trade.

by jae on Dec 1, 2009 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Didn’t know the second part, thanks for the info.

by Missing Barry on Dec 1, 2009 6:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Bass would be easier to grab since right now, Orlando is favoring Ryan Anderson over him in the starting lineup.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 3, 2009 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Orlando really does like it’s strategy of stretching the floor with 3 point shooters around Dwight and shooting 3’s or shots near the rim. Can’t say I disagree with that strategy at all.

I did see Bass playing some 3 for them recently, I thought that was strange (it was only in a short stretch, though)…

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Point taken.

So the question right now is, all things considered, would you trade Turiaf for Bass?

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 3, 2009 12:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Hmmm….dunno what their contract status is, so not taking that into account, I’d say they’re pretty similar. Bass is younger, so sure, why not.

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Both are getting paid 4mil. Turiaf’s contract is for this year, and next, with a player option in the third. Bass is getting paid for 3 years with a player option for the 4th. So a one for one would work fine. Turiaf is two years older. They are both considered role players and backup PFs. So I guess it’s a matter of preference. BUT Turiaf seems to be a betting presence in the locker room. At this point, without considering injuries, I’d take Bass over Turiaf. Turiaf is always tops in blocks in the league, but I’d rather have somebody like Bass that can bang down low and get rebounds. IMO, rebounds>blocks, even though blocks are more exciting than boxing out and getting the defensive board.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 3, 2009 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Also,

I think we could pull off a trade by sending CJ Watson their way (Since they tried to acquire them over the summer) and taking back Anthony Johnson. We may have to sweeten the deal with maybe a second round pick or something, but I think this trade is very plausible. It’s a very good, equal talent for talent trade. It’s just a question of how valuable Turiaf’s locker room presence is to us.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 3, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

was he really the 3?

or was he guarding the 3 and playing 4 on offense. Eitherway when he’s next to rashard or ryan anderson they can get away w/ it

by tafkasam on Dec 3, 2009 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah I forget who they were playing, but he was definitely the 3. He was guarding the 3, and even playing outside a bit on offense. He took advantage of being bigger than the guy guarding him to get to the rim. He both posted the smaller guy up and actually drove into the lane to overpower him. I wish I remember the details, but there was no question he was the 3rd biggest Magic on the floor.

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

The only one of our big men he might be better than is Turiaf.

Ahem… I’m pretty sure Brandon Bass is a fairly sizable upgrade of Mikki Moore as well.

by philthiest on Dec 1, 2009 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

it’s harder to pretend that he isn’t on the team if you say his name.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I will not name names, but when Moore was sent packing by the Kings last season, there was someone who posted that we should have scooped him up because he’d give us a legit inside presence and could “score and rebound”.

by jae on Dec 1, 2009 9:41 PM PST up reply actions  

i’ll be honest, i searched the archives to make sure that i didn’t say anything like that. i was worried that you were giving me a sneaky “that’s not what you said last year…” comment. thankfully, i didn’t, and old fanposts and comment threads are really fun to look through.

ps. “old fanposts and comment threads are really fun to look through.” would easily make it onto a list of things only a GSoM addict would say. a list that i would suggest someone make if the idea didn’t seem so much better than the result would be.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Dec 1, 2009 10:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah I really ignore everyone except the 4 guys that would make up our big man rotation if everyone was healthy. :)

by Missing Barry on Dec 1, 2009 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

You mean the four guys who are all out with injuries at the moment? It’s amazing that we’ve won any games under the circumstances.

by toddaverth on Dec 1, 2009 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah it really is frustrating, because there’s just nothing positive you can do about the situation. I like those 4 as the core big men in the future, but given the injury situation the last couple years, I’m beginning to think we might have to trade 1 or 2 of them simply because of the injury risk…

by Missing Barry on Dec 2, 2009 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I've been doing alot of thinking about this...

do you feel that a lot of injuries happen cause we play such a ridiculous pace??? Even the most mobile/athletic of big’s can’t handle it. I love uptempo basketball but we play such gimicky break-neck pace it’s worn out. The rest of the league views us as a gigantic gimmick….

even pheonix, denver and other uptempo don’t really seem to push it as much as we do…

The other aspect is just physical developement but it goes hand and hand… skinny guy running too fast, taking bumps trying to make plays… that’s where twists happen, dislocated shoulders etc.

by tafkasam on Dec 2, 2009 9:00 AM PST up reply actions  

It’s possible. It’s also possible that it’s just bad luck. I know it’s human nature to want to attribute human cause and/or blame to everything that happens in the world; at the same time, it’s often totally inappropriate. As they say: sh*t happens.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 2, 2009 10:40 AM PST up reply actions  

bad luck

yeah it’s bad luck 1 season, but now its continuous you gotta start looking… something is off. Most likely strength and conditioning combine w/ bad luck. End of day, stronger players rarely get pushed around thus spraining/dislocating less often

by tafkasam on Dec 2, 2009 10:48 AM PST up reply actions  

The season before we were very healthy.

Sometimes a coin lands heads up 10 times in a row.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Dec 2, 2009 11:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I’m inclined to think the bigger problem is we carry a guard heavy lineup, so we don’t have enough big men to cover the gap when injuries do happen. Most of this is bad luck – Turiaf’s injury is a holdover from this summer playing with France, Wright is an old injury that didn’t heal up as well as we thought, Andris is just the sort of injury that happens (maybe conditioning helps, maybe not playing for the national team helps, but it happens,) and Randolph’s is an ankle sprain – quite possibly the most common basketball injury of all time. If we had 6 big men, instead of 4.5, it wouldn’t hurt so much. (see Dallas, LA, Boston, Orlando.)

by toddaverth on Dec 3, 2009 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

THE CASE IS BEING MADE!

Among point guards in the west -

First in points per game (by a mile!), first in steals, sixth in field goal %, 9th in assists, 5th in blocked shots, 5th in rebounds

If he can bring up his assist total (as in guys make their shots!) and turn the ball over less – I think he passes up CP3 and others and coaches may select him. He won’t be voted on so he’ll need to impress the coaches.

by tjmax on Dec 1, 2009 10:59 AM PST reply actions  

As much as I love how Monta has been playing as of late.

He ain’t passing up CP3 anytime soon. Or Kobe, BRoy, Deron, or Nash. All 5 are posting up way better stats than Monta, and on top of that, their teams are actually winning. Parker and Billups are posting up numbers on par with Monta, with Monta probably posting up slightly better ones, but again, Billups and Parker are playing on winning teams as well. Hell, even Westbrook will get more votes than Monta, as sad as that may sound for us Warrior fans. Also, the Warriors as a team and Monta Ellis as a player don’t get enough national media attention to garner enough support to get Monta into the all star game this year. The only chance I see Monta getting into the All Star game is as a coach’s choice as the 11th or 12th man on the bench, but even that I highly doubt. The coaches will almost undoubtedly choose any of the above mentioned players simply due to seniority over Monta. Let’s face it, the all star game is nothing more than a glorified popularity contest and the Warriors are equivalent to the nerds in the cafeteria eating the free lunch and playing yugioh during break.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 3, 2009 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Monta is without a doubt a shoo-in for Dallas in February

Monta Ellis is the best, most dominant guard in basketball this year. This is because Curry’s acumen at the point position has enabled Ellis to return to his natural position off the ball. The result we’ve been seeing from his subsequent play doesn’t surprise me one bit, since I’ve felt since 2007-2008 he was the most talented offensive guard in the league. Kobe Bryant is simply playing on the same unspectacular level he always has, and given the fact his team is stacked, he really shouldn’t be anything special. Naturally, because he’s the most popular player in the league, he’ll get voted in (though Ellis is the better, more ssensational player) n Chris Paul is the best point guard in the league, so he’ll be voted in beside Kobe at the 1. As far as the Coaches’ votes are concerned, I’m sorry, Ellis is without a doubt getting the nod over anyone else. Brandon Roy (also a 2-guard) is not playing on the same level as Monta. Steve Nash is possible to get in. Deron Williams has NEVER gotten in, n Tony Parker is DEFINITELY not gonna overshadow Monta Ellis. That’s a ridiculous notion to believe that Parker could out-vote an MVP-calibur performer in Ellis. Ellis is definitely gonna put on a show at Dallas this year! He’ll be leading the league in scoring by then anyway.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Kobe Bryant is simply playing on the same unspectacular level he always has

Where do they find these people???

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 3, 2009 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Monta > Kobe

Do u mean to imply that Kobe is as permanent a fixture on the nightly highlight reels as Ellis, who scores almost 20 pts in the paint on a nightly basis n 40 without taking a 3-pt attempt?

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s a ridiculous notion to believe that Parker could out-vote an MVP-calibur performer in Ellis.

Leading us to a 3-5 record in a post-jack era! MVP! MVP! MVP!

by tafkasam on Dec 3, 2009 3:59 PM PST up reply actions  

You sure are krazee, max!

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Dec 3, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Wait, Wait...

Since Stephen Jackson was injured, the Warriors have gone 3-5, but they’ve also been (ironically) a better team. I mean, since Ellis has stepped up to the call n gone on a rampage (establishing himself as the team leader in minutes, points, assists, n steals per game, averaging 35 ppg n 4 spg going into the game against Denver, being lumped into the elite class of 20 ppg, 5 apg, n 4 rpg players in the league that also includes LBJ, D-Wade, n B. Jennings exclusively, recording 2 40-plus-pt games on 64% shooting in a 3-game span, limited Brandon Roy’s, Kobe Bryant’s, n Danny Grangers’s productivity on the defensive end, become the only player besides Michael Jordan to score 40-plus @ San Antonio in the Popvich era, etc.), the Warriors have only suffered 2 blowout losses- both of which came at the hands of last year’s Western Conference finalists. Meanwhile, you’re neglecting to recognize the fact that the Warriors have achieved this much success in spite of being probbaly the most injury-riddled team in the conference, if not the league (sans everyone from Biedrins, Turiaf, n Randolph- basically, their bigs- to CJ Watson, Kelenna Azubuike, Raja Bell, n even Coach!). This compared to their earlier-season blowout losses to Sacramento, the Clippers (at home, no less), Indiana, n the list goes on… meanwhile, the Warriors beat a team (Dallas, of all contenders) using only 6 players (a feat which hasn’t been achieved since 1955, I believe? Look it up). Meanwhile, Monta Ellis is playing OUT OF HIS MIND n everybody’s saying he needs help (post-Jax, of coarse). So what’s changed? Would u really prefer build your team around Deron Williams, Tony Parker, and/or Chauncey Billups instead of Monta simply because they’re more established stars, even without considering the strong upside for potential this Warriors team has when they actually (god forbid) HAVE their players (big men) healthy? Do you believe that Ellis’ recent phenomenal productivity will suddenly seize n desist then, when they’ll finally be in position to compete for a playoff seed? I think not. Ellis is gonna win his first scoring title this season in leading a (hopefully, as time winds) healthier team back into the playoffs.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Can we also acknowledge... ?

The Warriors schedule since losing the cancer known as Stephen Jackson has been @ Cleveland, @ Boston, vs Portland, @ Dallas, @ San Antonio, vs the Lakers, vs Indiana, n @ Denver (back-to-back)? Could Tony Parker, Chauncey Billups, Kobe, or anyone lead their respective teams to a better record vs a similar grouping of teams given a similar set of unfortunate circumstances (e.g. having 60% of the team’s players injured n out)?

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not denying your points (infact they are driven at in my fan post....)

but you are disregarding Kobe, who EASILY could. In fact he did for 3 or so years, sneaking mediocre lakers teams into playoffs on his back averaging over 30 (i belive he averaged 36ppg) 5+ assists, 5+ rebounds as efficiently as any guard who has taken that sheer volume on his back.

So to say he is better than Parker or a slowing down billups is debatable (they turn it over less… monta is much more spectacular) but comparing him to arguably the best player on the planet and writing kobe off as ‘unspectacular’ is just madness

by tafkasam on Dec 3, 2009 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Well then, we agree to disagree on Kobe's greatness

I continue to firmly believe one thing that (drastically) undermines your response, n I doubt this post may change your opinion any, but really, Kobe Bryant is (in my opinion, anyway) not all that the media/next-Jordan-seeking-dick-riders crack him up to be. I do feel that he’s the most over-rated player in NBA history. But all you hear from reporters/NBA journalists/Lakers beat riders with regard to KB24 is Jordan this, Jordan that. However, other than win 4 rings with arguably the greatest collection of talent of any other great player ever (collectively) between them (Shaq, Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, Trevor Ariza, Andrew Bynum, etc.), I don’t see what all the fuss is about. Really… Shaq wasn’t even a supporting player for those first 3 rings – Kobe was. So ok, u say he led mediocre post-Shaq teams into the playoffs. He did (sometimes), but that was literally it; n even that wasn’t always the case (since in 2005, they missed the playoffs for the first time in ages). And when they actually did get in, Kobe mounted arguably the greatest choke job in playoff history when his team fell to the Suns in Game 7 of a (very winnable) first-round series after letting the Suns come back from a 1-3 series deficit to win it. Forget the fact that the Suns were one of those teams that simply REFUSED to play defense, Kobe- falsely regarded as the game’s greatest offenive player- opted to take something ridiculous like 2 shots in the ENTIRE second half instead of take over. The only choke job I can imagine that rivals that ugly scene was the one in the 2008 Finals when Kobe did absolutely nothing to help his team as the Celtics rallied back from a 24-point deficit to win @ LA, or worse, when he stood absolutely idly by as the Celtics clinched the series in a (damn near historic) 39-point whopping just 2 games later. Actually, the NBA’s “first 5-game series sweep” loss to the Pistons in 2004 stands as another classic Finals clunker (present-not only Shaq, but Payton, Malone, n Fisher!). So you say he averaged 30 ppg, 5+ asts, n 5+ rebounds as efficiently as anyone during his peak. Well, that’s just not true. Among a given season’s top 5 scoring list, it’s pretty safe to say Kobe’s field goal efficiently has consistently (without fail) ranked among the worst of the lot. In his popular 81-point season (2006), he shot 45% from the field. The following season he shot 46%. In 2008, he shot 46%. Not once has he ever shot 50% from the field on a season. In fact, the 49% he’s shooting this season (so far) is being lauded as his most efficient output ever. That’s great, but he’s in his 14th season. Also, if he’s so great, how has he only won 1 regular season n 1 Finals MVP? Why was that one regular season MVP so suspect (when Chris Paul was blatantly dissed)? I see those as charities. Homages to the most popular (not nearly the best) player of the last few years (since 81 pts vs Toronto) n the fact that he’s due validations… really, look at the Lakers’ records in 2008 without either Bynum or Gasol, n the Lakers were quite average (exactly 5-5 while Pau was out with a hamstring thing). His scoring titles? He’s won only 2. Meanwhile, Monta Ellis is, at 24, beginning just his 5th season in the league, n has already emerged as a special talent days after their so-called “best player” was shipped to hell-out-of-here. Ellis has already shot 53% from the field n led all guards (even finished 14th overall) in field goal efficiency on a season. That in a season when he scored 30-plus pts 16 times n became the 9th guard in league history to shoot 60% from the field for an ENTIRE MONTH in February while averaging 26 ppg (all in his last full season of 2007-2008). If u ask me, by the time their careers have ended n people compare the two shooting guards, Ellis will be judged quite favorably- if the already phenomenal statistical achievements up to this point in his young career are any indication. Remember, he JUST turned 24 a month n change ago.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Among a given season’s top 5 scoring list, it’s pretty safe to say Kobe’s field goal efficiently has consistently (without fail) ranked among the worst of the lot.

It’s actually not safe.

2006/07
Kobe ppg: 31.6 (ranked 1st in the NBA)
Kobe TS%: .580 (ranked 2nd among the top five scorers)

2007/08
Kobe ppg: 28.3 (ranked 2nd in the NBA)
Kobe TS%: .576 (ranked 2nd among the top five scorers)

2008/09
Kobe ppg: 26.8 (ranked 3rd in the NBA)
Kobe TS%: .561 (ranked 5th among the top five scorers)

So you’re one for the last three in your “without fail” proposition. And in even ’08/09 Kobe was within 15 points of #2.

As for your Monta > Kobe theory…

Career TS%
Kobe .558
Monta .546

Career pts/36
Kobe 25.2
Monta 18.2
(NB: I’m giving a little boost to Monta by using per 36 numbers, since he’s generally played in faster-tempo, higher-scoring games).

Career reb/36
Kobe 5.2
Monta 4.1

Career ast/36
Kobe 4.6
Monta 3.9

Career defense
Kobe: by consensus, very good.
Monta: by consensus, not very good (but improving slightly).

Career clutch shots and performances in big situations
Kobe: a whole ton.
Monta: um, not quite as many.

Wait for it … “damn you and your numbers!!!!!”

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 3, 2009 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

What are you? A Laker's fan?

Kidding, but seriously… Is there really an argument over who’s better Monta or Kobe? This is kind of ridiculous. Just today, I’ve seen arguments against the Warriors signing Lebron (assuming they have a chance) and now this… Wow.
I’m all for arguing that Kobe’s overrated, but that Monta’s better? Not quite, not yet, maybe not ever.

Also, basing your argument on Monta’s recent string of games and carrying a beat up, and relatively untalented team, I’m sure I can post totals from Antawn Jamison during the 2000-1 season that would rival what Monta’s done recently (the back-to-back 51 comes to mind). But was Antawn an all-star? Nope. Was he even one of the 20 best NBA players that year? Probably not. He was simply a good player on a really bad team.

by philthiest on Dec 3, 2009 6:23 PM PST up reply actions  

It's funny u should mention Jamison

Among the burgeoning list of Ellis’ insane accomplishments during Ellis’ post-Jackson rampage, Monta (aside from everything I’ve mentioned above), also became the first Warrior player since Antawn Jamison in late November-early December 2002 to record back-to-back-to-back 30+ point games… go figure. In Fairness, I realize considering the extreme gap in current global popularity between the two players what a relatively bold statement it is to declare that Ellis is greater than Kobe, but I think the current contrast is just that, current. The difference is in public/media hype/perception n nothing more. That will change soon. Indeed, I do feel that the limit for Ellis is the greatest player of his era (similar to Jordan in his Bulls days) n that when he hangs up his sneakers years down the road, it’ll be him that’s recognized as the definitive player of the And 1/Generation X basketball era – not Bryant (nor even LeBron or D-Wade, all of whom I firmly believe Ellis will eventually outlast/overshadow). That’s how I feel n how I have felt since witnessing maybe 80% of the Warriors games during the 2007-2008 season via League Pass (I live in New York).

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 6:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I live in New York.

Whoa, me too. Some day we should meet for a drink…

of Kool-Aid! XD

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 3, 2009 6:39 PM PST up reply actions  

What makes you so high on Monta’s ceiling? He’s been in the league a little while now, and he has a long ways to go in a lot of areas to get to that elite HoF level, and really has some physical limitations. Short arms, short for a 2, not built, questionable lateral quickness, in addition to the things like ball handling, passing, 3 point shooting, rebounding that he needs to improve substantially on to even get close to that conversation…

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 6:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Career clutch shots and performances in big situations
Kobe: a whole ton.
Monta: um, not quite as many.

I just gotta chime in here – last time I saw Kobe’s clutch numbers quoted they were actually pretty horrendous. Sure we remember the ones he hits, but we disregard all the times with the shot clock or game clock winding down that he waives off the pick and rolls, goes 1 on 1, and ends up taking a bad shot (or no shot at all, see: vs. Turkoglu last year). I’m sure there are some sort of clutch splits where he does well, I’m by no means suggesting he’s unclutch or anything, just suggesting in certain “clutch” circumstances his decision-making changes and he tries to do too much on his own and it results it poor shots (some of which he obviously hits, but not a good % overall).

I don’t think he necessarily deserves the reputation of a clutch player – he deserves the reputation of the best wing since Jordan (though I’m confident Lebron will pass him in that category at some point)….

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 6:54 PM PST up reply actions  

O yea, Kobe's been terrible in the clutch too...

I just have to second your comments regarding Kobe’s under-rated failings in the clutch. Judging from video reels I’ve seen on youtube n various other things I’ve read about his efficiency in the clutch relative to MJ’s, he’s really quite atrocious indeed. Good call. But I feel that Monta Ellis will eventually be > everybody else at the wing.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I didn’t mean to imply that Kobe was any better in clutch situations than in non-clutch ones. I was talking counting numbers, not rates — hence “a whole ton.” As with all players, the bigger the sample size (in the playoffs, in the “clutch,” whenever) the more likely the rate numbers will regress to the player’s career averages, which in Kobe’s case are quite impressive. In other words: for all predictive intents and purposes, there is no such thing as clutch, for Kobe or anyone else.

I suspect (and have argued on this site) that Kobe is probably a bit overrated, and Monta (outside of this site) is probably a bit underrated. There’s still a huge gulf between them. Crap, how did I even get stuck arguing this ridiculous point? Where the heck is jae? Wahhhh….

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 3, 2009 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not a ridiculous argument

Ellis is the better, more clutch player n on some level- whether subconsciously or otherwise- you’re starting to realize you already understood that. You just aren’t ready to become outcast by all the public scrutiny I’ve been fighting off on this page over the course of the last few hours. lmao. But seriously, on a more basic level, Ellis is simply the quicker player (fastest first step in the league), the more athletic player (most athletic in the league, for sure), the more explosive player (perhaps the most explosive in the league), n the more vlauable player to his team (e.g. he’s currently the team leader in 4 different categories, possibly more). Has it ever been safe to say Kobe led his team in more than even ONE category simultaneously? I honestly don’t know…

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 8:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha.

The main thing I may be “starting to realize” — whether arguing that Kobe is better than Monta, or that LeBron would be a decent addition to the Warriors, or that Obama is not a Nazi — is that there are some arguments better ignored than engaged…

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 3, 2009 8:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I dunno what you’re talking about…

most athletic in the league, for sure

Are you trying to say something like this is a bit….embellished?!

In all seriousness, though, going back to the clutch situations – I’m not sure what you want to define as clutch, but there are definitely situations some consider “clutch” where the league average is actually a decent amount worse than normal. Like end of quarter/end of game shots, for instance – some of this is simply because, working against the clock, eventually you have to take a shot even if it’s a poor one. So everyone’s production is expected to go down, Kobe included. From the stats I’ve seen in the past, Kobe actually fairs worse in situations like this than normal, and from anecdotal observations, I do not think this is sample error. I think Kobe’s decision making is poor in these situations, and he’s more likely to go 1 on 1 and/or force a bad shot.

You know what you’re talking about, so I’m sure I don’t need to tell you that there’s a reason teams don’t just go 1 on 1 all game – they’re bad % shots, and I believe Kobe is more apt to do this in “clutch” situations. So it’s not that he’s “clutch” or “not clutch” in terms of physical ability, as much as he takes lower quality shots.

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't think of anyone in the league as athletic as Ellis...

His athleticism is so insane; he can get off 1,000 different shots. I’ve heard him called the greatest EVER at converting a layup with either hand hopping off the wrong foot. His athleticism n creativity are second to none among active players as far I’m concerned. Indeed, I think it’s this unparalleled ability to creatively improvise according to whatever the defense gives him that makes him the most exciting player to watch in the league. It’s this quality that makes any and every Warriors game a joy to watch, because you look forward (or I certainly do anyway) to watching to see what fantastic highleet reel Monta’s gonna display on any given night. This brings me to a statement I made earlier (see Monta > Kobe), when I implied Ellis is BY FAR the more permanent fixture on the nightly ESPN Top 10 highlight reels. Well, he is. It’s why you’ll see him featured at least twice (if not more) in the highlights after one game.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 9:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Last I checked highlights aren’t the mark of a good player. Helping a team win as much as possible is.

And sure, Monta is a very good athlete for the NBA, but he’s not even close to say…Lebron James.

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 9:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...

I don’t think the two- highlights and greatness- are mutually exclusive. All the great players have featured more prominently on the nightly highlight reels n tapes than all the other, less great, role players. Michael Jordan is the most obvious example of this fact. Magic, Bird, n even LeBron are also proof of this relationship. I’m not promoting flashy dunks as the ultimate testimony to a great player’s abilities by any stretch (indeed, if that were the case, Vince Carter would have to be recognized as the greatest player of the 00’s, or even… Gerald Green??), but u have to admit, Monta’s a pretty good example of the best of both worlds. I mean, for every highlight he’s featured on for a given night (which could be a lot, seriously, the highlights from the recent Indiana game make it appear to be a personal showcase), he’s got the statistically superb output (see a whole bunch of stuff I’ve already alluded to up top) to back up his legitimacy as a special player. But the highlights are really what give the players their mass appeal. It’s on this note that I feel Ellis will eventually exceed everyone else in terms of his public perception n popularity from basketball fans and viewers around the world

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 9:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Results are far more important than highlight reels. Results are what win games. Monta’s results suggest he is a rather good player. He is simply not as good as Bryant (who I don’t rate in the top 5 in the league FWIW).

For what it’s worth, you would seem slightly less ridiculous if you learned that the word “and” has two letters you seem to omit regularly.

by jae on Dec 7, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

It's just that

once the subject of a Warriors forum has devolved into being a lame attempt at a dissertation on English Composition 101, I lose interest. That’s a surefire way to make even one of my favorite subjects seem boring.

If you feel Kobe is superior to Monta in any way, shape, or form, power to you. You already know how I feel about the subject and I feel I’ve exhausted my energy in extending the debate any further. Needless to say, I think Ellis is the second coming of Jordan n Warriors fans in general seem to take his one-of-a-kind talent for granted. Frankly, it offends me.

by Krazee max on Dec 7, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

You are confusing a “lame attempt at a dissertation of English Composition 101” with “trying to write like an adult who pretends to care about the words he’s putting forward for others to read.” I have noticed a high correlation, not perfect, but very high, between the quality of one’s grammar and the quality of one’s arguments. Being too lazy to write out “and”? That’s a surefire way to make your posts look even more ridiculous, not that they needed much help.

by jae on Dec 7, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I would say that when someone makes an argument that Monta is among the three best players in the game, that the discussion has slipped away from basketball into fantasy. May as well discuss Lord of the Rings. It’s about as connected to reality.

by jae on Dec 8, 2009 8:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Lord of the Rims!

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 8, 2009 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow...

I couldn’t disagree with u more. I could try… but I wouldn’t be successful. To each his own, I guess. The only way to settle this is to see where Monta stands at the end of the season. If he’s in the top 3 judging by what he’ll have accomplished this year, you won’t hear the end of it from me.

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 12:43 PM PST up reply actions  

We’re at the one quarter mark of the season, and Monta’s probably not even Top 50 (by WP, PER, plus-minus, MVP votes, or whatever comprehensive measure you like best).

At the end of this season, when he isn’t anywhere the Top 3, can we expect you to crawl back in the hole you emerged from? Here’s hoping… ;-)

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 9, 2009 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

top 10 players in the nba

-Fanpost by a blinded Warriors Fan

1. Lebron
2. CP3
3. Monta
4. Dwight Howard
5. Anthony Randolph
6. Lamar Odom (carried the lakers)
7. Kevin Garnett
8. Anthony Morrow
9. Camelo Anthony
10. Mikki Moore

Other rec’d fanposts by this poster:
-“Fire Nellie, why won’t he play a future hall of famer, Randolph”
-“Trade idea: Mikki Moore, Devean George, Corey Maggette 4 Dwight howard”
-“We St1lL BeLe1Ve”

by tafkasam on Dec 9, 2009 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Dude.

I’ll let you in on a little secret: LeBron “airball” James sucks. He can’t shoot, is an arrogant jerk, and hates puppies.

And where the heck on that list are TMNT, Marco, Jamal, and Cap’n Jack?

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 9, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

That's funny

I have LeBron as one of the other two players I regard who comprise the Big 3 with Ellis (the other one being D-Wade). Needless to say, if Ellis isn’t the leader in scoring, doesn’t make this year’s All-Star game, n doesn’t continue to just be plain phenomenal over the course of the season, I won’t post on this page anymore. :D

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

continue

Verb – to remain in a particular state or capacity.

So…he would have to start playing phenomenal to be able to continue playing phenomenal….

Look, I like Monta, I do think the kid has talent and can help us win. His scoring isn’t particularly good at the moment – while the volume is obviously good (the amount he scores), he’s taking too many shots to get it. His 52.4 TS% is below average – so every time he shoots, he scores less than an average player does, on average. He’s shown the ability to score very efficiently in the past, and I do believe he’ll get back to more respectable numbers in the future…but in the current time period he simply isn’t scoring efficiently enough for his scoring to actually help us win games. He’s also racking up turnovers like it’s his job (his job is, in fact, the opposite). I do like the fact that his assist rate is up, but I still think he can do better in that regard, especially playing with guys like Vlad Rad, Morrow, Watson, Curry.

In other words, Monta’s current level of play is not phenomenal.

by Missing Barry on Dec 9, 2009 5:10 PM PST up reply actions  

You have really high standards

for what makes a player phenomenal. Either that, or you’re a very cynical Warriors fan who can’t look beyond the recent losing streak. The fact that you’re focusing solely on the fact that Ellis is turning the ball over n his TS% is (apparently) not good (I personally find the whole TS% thing on this blog to be a little over-rated) is demonstrative of this.

Sure, wins are hard to come by for us lately. And sure, Ellis is leading the team (and even, the league) in turnovers right now. But he’s also being asked to do more for his team than anyone else in the league right now. For some reason, my repeated mentions on this forum that Ellis is leading the Warriors in virtually every statistical category (which includes mpg, ppg, apg, n spg as well) since Jax left have fallen well (even drowned)beneath the radar.

In the 11 games since Jax was traded, Monta has played less than 46 minutes 5 times n less than 42 minutes 3 times. He’s also gone the distance (for the whole 48) 4 times, n had one 47-minute n one 46-minute effort during the same span. He’s played for 47, 48, n 48 respectively in his last three games. Is there anyone else in the league that has been asked to go the distance even once (outside of Morrow n Bad Vlad)?

How about the fact that Ellis is routinely being assigned the opposing team’s best player (from the 1-4 positions) over the span, including Brandon Roy, Kobe Bryant, Carmelo Anthony, n Kevin Durant? Danny Granger? Ellis is 6’3" n maybe 180 lbs. How much energy must a player- let alone guard- expend to have to not only be the team’s stopper, but also the first (and usually second n third) option on offense? But enough of what he’s been asked to do… what about how he’s actually responded?

Again, I don’t care about the TS%. What about the fact that Ellis has scored 30-plus points in 6 of his last 9 games? What about the two 40-plus efforts on 64% shooting in a span of 3 games (Vs two of the better defensive teams in the league at that, one of the 2- Indiana- even leading the league in shot-blocking)? The OUTRAGEOUS coinciding stat (resulting from that first 40-plus effort) that put him in the rare club that was exclusive solely to MJ (who’s the only previous player to score 40-plus @ San Antonio in the Popovich era)? The fact that Ellis, who was something like 15th in the league in scoring when Jax was traded is currently ranked number 7 n is just on the verge of kicking the door down on the top 5 (sorry Dirk n D-Wade), after only 11 games?

You could go on n on. How about the short notice with which he’s been summoned to perform on these levels? What about Ellis’ own (remarkable) poise in the face of all this? The fact that despite demonstrating a workhorse ethic on the court during all this, he hasn’t been even slowed n bothered by any semblance of an injury? That’s durability for ya. What about the fact that he’s taken on such a positive attitude (despite the ridiculous distractions plaguing the team before Jax left n all the subsequent negativity that’s ensued since his departure, with regards to the unsusual onslaught of injuries, n the resulting losses) with regards to his newfound role as the team’s unquestionable leader? Considering how new all these responsibilities are to him, along with the unfamiliar pressure that come with the expectations that are placed on him to continue to perform as well as he has under the circumstances, I think Ellis has been nothing short of phenomenal.

Let’s not forget that Ellis has also surprised everyone (including myself) with his coinciding emergence as an elite wing defender (and he’s guarding everyone else, too). Hell, I’m surprised! So to blame Ellis for absolutely any of the team’s recent string of grand misfortune is so unreasonable- given he’s really been one of a very few bright spots- it doesn’t even seem fair. Or even to compare his current percentages to those he was routinely putting up when he had the reliability of a Baron Davis, an Al Harrington, an Andris Biedrins, n (eek), even Stephen ballhog Jackson to defer to. Naturally, now that he’s the undisputed focal point of the team, it’s only natural his percentages should decline. That’s not unlike the other star guards in the league, though. When has Kobe EVER (in 13 years) shot 50% from the field? LeBron? D-Wade?

Nevermind that, what about the fact that Ellis’ free-throw shooting is MARKEDLY improved. He went from a 70% shooter to hitting roughly 80-85% routinely. And he’s getting there as much as anyone in the league. Just like that. He’s (certainly) scoring more points than ever before. He’s already scored 492 pts this season n made more field goals (193) than D-Wade, Chris Bosh, or Kevin Durant. Sure he’s attempted 418 shots thus far this year (more than Kobe, Durant, Wade, James, or Bosh), but his team’s also spent the better part of the season in the infirmary.

Ellis wasn’t expected to take as many shots as either of the above-mentioned titans going into the season, let alone MAKE! He wasn’t expected to lead his team in assists (that designation was widely reserved for Curry or Jax). He wasn’t expected to be in the top 7 in scoring n take 28 shots per game to keep his team in the games. He wasn’t expected to be second in the league in steals and/or go for 48 as many times as he’s had to. Or especially to lead his team in everything. Seriously, probably everything (he’s 5th in the league in points in the paint as well). lmao. He wasn’t expected to join the elite class of only four 20-ppg, 5 apg, rpg players either, but he’s held down that distinction with as many problems as he has all the other ones I’ve mentioned- 0.

I adore Ellis, it’s true. I’ve loved his whole game n his attitude since I noticed him 2 years ago. I also love the fact that I can repeatedly write essays on this forum with all these arguments n statistical points that continue to support the reasons I’m so fond of him. I shouldn’t even have to say much because his game’s been doing most of the talking… but I do love him, so I have to remind you guys if Ellis is being phenomenal. Especially when you consider how special a player he’s been, when you consider none of the current circumstances this season were expected going in, but yet in the face of them, he’s responded by flipping the proverbial “switch” accordingly. I’m sorry, I don’t think there are too many other players in the league that have that krazee “switch” than can be turned on on a moment’s notice, at the nudge of even the slightest request. But you guys don’t see it. Why you continue to underestimate n undermine Ellis’ game (nevermind his potential) in the PRESENT days is beyond me. A bit cynical, no?

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh, all I said is Monta hasn’t been phenomenal. I do reserve that term for the best of the best – you know, guys in Lebron’s class (Lebron is averaging 28 points per 36 minutes, 7 rebounds, over 8 assists, on above average efficiency)….Ellis isn’t putting up that kind of production.

I’m unsure why you don’t seem to agree with TS% – you seem content to cite FG% or FT% the way I’d cite TS%…well, TS% is the same thing, it just combines FG%, FT%, 3PT% by how often you shoot each to come up with 1 number. Essentially, it’s telling you the combined value of a players different shooting percentages. I don’t see how that’s not more useful than looking at any of the components individually?

Anyways, I agree on Monta’s defense. I really like his effort level on D and have been impressed by his overall effectiveness. He’s always been good at creating turnovers, and now he’s gotten even better. I’ve argued before that his ability to create turnovers is a good reflection of a good basketball IQ (which is something people around here have bashed him for).

So to blame Ellis for absolutely any of the team’s recent string of grand misfortune is so unreasonable- given he’s really been one of a very few bright spots- it doesn’t even seem fair. Or even to compare his current percentages to those he was routinely putting up when he had the reliability of a Baron Davis, an Al Harrington, an Andris Biedrins, n (eek), even Stephen ballhog Jackson to defer to. Naturally, now that he’s the undisputed focal point of the team

I wasn’t blaming our losing on Monta. I guess I could have been more clear – Monta’s TS% is not something we should be content with, but for the time being, it’s still probably our best option (Morrow is a better option but he’s not capable of getting open for a high enough volume currently). I also was talking about his production – I don’t particularly care about things like his leadership or being a focal point – all I’m discussing is how productive he is when I say he hasn’t been phenomenal.

The bottom line is Monta has some significant improvements, especially offensively, if he wants to take his game to the next level. He’s not an elite player at the moment. His scoring % isn’t high enough. His assists aren’t high enough. His turnovers are way too high. These are important things, and though Ellis is doing good things and I’m not bashing him, I’m just pointing out he has areas he needs to improve to really be elite.

I don’t think my standards are particularly high as much as I’m not impressed by big scoring numbers that come at below average efficiency. Guys like Kobe, Wade, Lebron all get their points on a lot less shots than Ellis. That’s the biggest difference.

by Missing Barry on Dec 9, 2009 7:06 PM PST up reply actions  

(Maggette’s a good option, too)

by Missing Barry on Dec 9, 2009 7:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough

I do believe Wade was either first or second in turnovers (or was it top 3?) as recently as a season ago, when he was coming up big for his team as consistently as Ellis is these days.

Don’t get me wrong, I love D-Wade, n having nothing but the utmost respect for him n 3 other players in particular (LeBron, Paul, n Melo) beside Monta. But I think that it’s also reasonable to take into account the unusual onset of injuries that have afflicted our team recently, as opposed to those of any of the aforementioned guys in the last 2 seasons. Wade was leading a young team, but they were healthy. Ellis is leading one that’s both young n injured. :D

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 7:18 PM PST up reply actions  

If by “leading” you mean "leading in turnovers without the assists that suggest that he’s taking good care of the ball, then yes,

max, there is no sane argument that Monta is even in the same category of basketball contribution as Lebron, Wade, Chris Paul (who may be the best of the trio —what he’s doing this year is absurd, considering how fabulous he already was). He’s certainly not as much of a positive impact as Dwight Howard. He’s not as productive as Bryant or Deron Williams or Brandon Roy, or Chauncey Billums or ‘Melo and again, it’s not close. Hell, I don’t think there’s a strong case that he’s really better than Kevin Martin, that he does more for his team than Tony Parker.

When it gets down to it, production is what wins games. Monta isn’t as productive as those guys and as such, he doesn’t increase our chance of winning as much as those guys do for their respective teams. Any measure of “better” that doesn’t reflect how much a player adds to his team’s chance of winning is meaningless.

by jae on Dec 9, 2009 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Monta isn’t as productive as those guys and as such, he doesn’t increase our chance of winning as much as those guys do for their respective teams.

What are you basing this statement on? We’ve already established that Ellis turns the ball over a lot (I just conceded that fact a few posts above). But did you read anything else that I mentioned (in a 10-paragraph paper, replete with statistical citations left n right, no less)?

Ellis is better n (much) more valuable to his team than Bryant. When has Bryant ever shouldered such a load as Ellis is now with the youthful/injury-riddled Dubs?

Parker? He came in n won a championship in his second season (n 2 more over the subsequent 4 seasons), not because he led anybody, but rather because he came into a great situation with Duncan (the greatest PF of all-time), Manu, n a slew of other tested veterans/role-players. This is no different from Rajon Rondo (whom I also love n feel is better than Bryant) today.

Deron Williams is a great player, but has he ever been in the situation Ellis has been since Jax was shipped (e.g. young/injury-riddled squad)? No. They missed Boozer for an extended period last season, but even alongside Boozer (the Jazz’s lone All-Star, by the way), the Jazz fell short in the first round (in 5 games no less). The previous season (2008), they fell to LA in the second round in 6 (the same Lakers that were humiliated in a historic fashion in the Finals, but I’ve already touched on Bryant).

‘Melo? Really? He was phenomenal last season, but let’s not forget last season was also the year ’Melo was charged with having to shed the image of a career failure that was born of reputation of coming up short in the first round of the playoffs (indeed, last spring is the first time he actually shed this stigma).

Kevin Martin? What the hell are u talking about? This guy’s probably missed MORE games than he’s actually played in over the coarse of his professional career (let alone the fact that he has yet to meet ANY semblance of playoff success whatsoever)! He’s probably in the infirmary RIGHT NOW as I’m writing this! Come on, man.

Dwight Howard really isn’t all that, either. Let’s be honest, he was an absolute non-factor in the Finals in June for the same reason that he’s generally been regarded with great reservation when it comes to the question of his status among the elite players: he has minimal offensive prowess n is generally very predictable in that area. In fact, Monta Ellis absolutely outshined him in their recent meeting. You can’t compare these two offensively. It’s a terrible comparison. And speaking of guys’ Ellis has outshined…

Brandon Roy is not on the same level as Ellis either. You saw the Portland game. Roy’s never been passed the first round of the playoffs either (n sans Oden, is no longer expected to this season either), which is something Ellis has done, in style (sorry Dirk).

This leaves us with James, Wade, n Paul. Paul is the best point guard in the world n for this reason, I don’t like to compare his game to Ellis, since Ellis is a 2. However, in terms of value to their teams, I don’t see how CP gets the nod over Ellis in this (important) department either. What did Paul do in the playoffs against Denver last Spring? Why didn’t he do anything, if he’s that good? I adore Paul as much as (if not moreso than) the next guy, but even I could tell u that that phenomenal team of 2008 was going down the tubes when they let Jannero Pargo (their only semblance of scoring off the bench) go that off-season. And yet, Paul was also not playing on a team where the average age was 25-26 (nor were/are LBJ n/or D-Wade, both of who I’ve also touched on above).

So again, I’m not sure what you’re basing your rationale on, but it seems that, with you (moreso than most), it’s probably more a case of just stark cynicism than anything else (as a Warriors fan) when it comes to your (overstated) dismissal of Ellis as nothing more than an (apparently) average player.

You are wrong about this, sir… I don’t even think YOU honestly believe any of the guys I’ve just covered (aside from, obviously, CP, James, n Wade) are better than Ellis. As I said, CP n Ellis play more or less different styles of game n I prefer not to compare the two beasts. James n Wade however are in the same class n are (in my opinion) currently not better (let alone more valuable players to their squads) than Ellis -who’s team is again, unlike James’ or Wade’s, young, inexperienced, n… in the infirmary most of the time.

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 8:40 PM PST up reply actions  

As far as Chauncey's concerned...

I love Chauncey. He’s definitely a huge difference-maker. But he doesn’t carry a team, either. Melo is the most valuable player to the Nuggets’ success, without a doubt. Chauncey deserved his Finals MVP in 2004 for sure, but those Pistons teams from up until Chauncey was traded last year, were among the most balanced n harmonious clubs ever assembled in basketball. He doesn’t do (nor has he ever done) what Ellis is doing for his team right now though, in terms of dropping 30-plus every other night n also leading the team in assists, steals, n minutes per game.

How many times has Chauncey played 48 minutes this year? Or even Kobe? They have very good veteran teams n therefore, aren’t required too. If you take each of those guys off of their respective teams however, n take Ellis off the Warriors’ roster, the Lakers n Nuggets would win A LOT more games than the Warriors would. No question.

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 9:05 PM PST up reply actions  

What are you basing this statement on?

I’m basing it on reality. I’m basing it on not being insane. I’m basing it on having critical thinking skills where I don’t make ridiculous claims about how Monta is better than a host of players because those players didn’t have that much success in the playoffs while somehow glossing over the fact that Monta has seen the playoffs once, didn’t perform well in them and does not appear to be in any danger of helping his team get there in the near future.

I’m basing it on actual analysis of the game of basketball that is more complex that you appear to be ready to deal with, though it’s not terribly complex.

However, in terms of value to their teams, I don’t see how CP gets the nod over Ellis in this (important) department either.

And with this, it is clear that there is no point in discussing anything with you. Your knowledge of basketball analysis is lacking; your reasoning is worse.

by jae on Dec 9, 2009 9:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Really? You'e gonna love this...

The New Orleans Hornets record this season with Chis Paul in the lineup: 6-7

The New Orleans Hornets’ record this season without Chris Paul in the lineup: 4-5.

It appears the Hornets were exactly as better off without CP as they’ve been with. And here’s the really Krazee part: The Hornets without Paul, have matched their longest win streak of the season (of 3 games) that they had WITH!

If by your rationale, I’m krazee (good pun) n my reasoning is lacking, then the fact that I’m saying Paul’s value to his team is no greater than Ellis’ should not be clearly reinforced by any statistical analysis of the Hornets’ ratio of wins to losses this season with n without CP. Because I’m insane. How I couldn’t possibly support my argument with any kind of astute “basketball analysis”?

Alas, your perception of what is insane is insane. Now I’m no hater of CP. But I’m no Randle McMurphy, either. Indeed, the above statistical analysis of the Hornets’ ratio of wins to losses with or without Paul this season appear to demonstrate the Hornets to be exactly no worse (nor, better) sans Paul than they’ve been with.

Outrageous, isn’t it? Numbers!? Now let’s see. The Warriors this season have struggled so much WITH Ellis (for the reasons I’ve cited repeatedly above, God bless them) they haven’t even been as successful as the Hornets WITHOUT Paul (insomuch as they have yet to put together a win streak that’s run for 3 consecutive games). So, does your own (suspiciously) sane reasoning/basketball logic lead you to believe that the Warriors could be as successful as the Hornets (who could win without CP) were without CP without their own best player in Ellis, who routinely has led his club in the points n assists (n everything else) categories?

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 10:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Brandon Roy is not on the same level as Ellis either.

You’re right. Roy is at a much, much higher level. He’s a more efficient scorer, getting nearly as many points on significantly fewer shots, has been a better passer getting similar assists while turning the ball over far less often.

You’d do better to learn a bit more about the game, about efficiency, about what correlates with winning and what doesn’t. You’re just embarrassing yourself.

by jae on Dec 9, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I think

you’re embrassing yourself trying to embarass me! Kevin Martin > Monta Ellis? The same Kevin Martin who’s Kings haven’t missed a beat without him? The one who would have a Most Improved Player award literally if it weren’t for Mr. Ellis? The evidence seems to indicate the opposite, in fact, your “reasonable” thinking seems wholly unreasonable here. What are you thinking when you say this?

Dwight Howard better than Monta? The same Dwight Howard who has a grand total of all of… what, 2 offensive moves? A dunk, n a running right jump hook? Meanwhile, Monta has an offensive arsenal of arguably 1,000 shots. Why’d you say that?

by Krazee max on Dec 9, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I hate how this argument has gotten into skinny box's

none the less in monta’s defense look at team we have now? He is forced to play 48 minutes and despite what some argue, that will hurt his efficiency, particularly at end of games when he’s almost been a detriment do to exhaustion.

So i’ll reserve my judgment of monta has a so called ‘leader’ or ‘alpha dog’ until we have a full roster. No matter what statistics one pulls up, and how bad his shooting has been, monta to the rim is a better option than pass to mikki moore or radmonovic.

As for your Dwight Howard point. I would 100 times out of 100 opportunities trade monta for Dwight Howard. Defense counts, rebounding counts and he’s the best at those 2 things for big man. Look at Orlando and how they r comprised. They remind me alot of the we believe warriors w/ the exception of Howard for Biedrins. Howard is such an exceptional rebounder and defensive presense they can afford to play 4 peremeter players. The composition of Barnes, Peitrus, Rashard Lewis, VC, Jameer is not that much better than warriors w/ Baron, Jrich, Jack, Harrington, Barnes, Pietrus. But having Howard in the middle makes them all infinitely better. Keep in mind the We Believe team struggled for 8 seeds. I Don’t think anyone would argue this Orlando team would be a top 4 team in the west. Possibly #2 to Lakers

Like someone said on another fanpost. Reason Orlando gets o many open threes is Howard. Warriors can’t fun that system cause when we give ball to Biedrins or Turiaf in the post, no wing defender will collapse down. If you give it to Howard, even if he only has 2 moves, he MUST be double teamed cause he’s such a physical presence, he will score the same way every time no matter what a singular defender will do.

Krazee I get your point on monta being more skilled/exciting that howard. But Howard’s impact on the game is infinitely more so.

I’d go so far as to say we trade monta for Howard we’re a playoff team w/ no other additions.

by tafkasam on Dec 10, 2009 9:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Thanks

for acknowledging the significant point I’ve been trying to make for several essays/posts above (that has somehow gone really overlooked) about the extraordinary demands the Warriors have been asking of Monta recently with regards to his exorbitant amounts of playing time (and the subsequent exhaustion that’s wont to result) per game.

As far as your trade proposal of Ellis for Howard, I wouldn’t make that trade. Ever. You’ve raised some interesting points in your comparison of the Magic to the “We Believe” Warriors, and I suspect that you’re right about the Orlando Magic as presently constituted being a legitimate 2- or 3-seed out West. You’re right about the fact that although he has (glaring) flaws on offense, Howard is a phenomenal rebounder n shot-blocker, which is just as crucial for a star center. It’s also true that despite his shortcomings on the offensive end, he usually does manage to get his points anyway, strictly as a result of his strength n mass.

As dominant as Howard is though, he’s still a very flawed player. For example, as he proved in the Finals last June when he wasn’t much of a factor, he has a lot of work to do with improving his ability to pass out of a double-team. His inability to do so astutely enough against the Lakers (with the Magic’s season on the line) demonstrated this.

Howard is not as adept at doing this as Monta Ellis (our own best defensive player), who draws equally as much attention when he dances into the paint (at will) n dishes the ball back out to a wide-open Anthony Morrow, Bad Vlad, or Steph Curry. Also, unlike Ellis (or Shaq, whom Howard understandably warrants a lot of comparisons to), Howard is not dominant enough of a player that he can consistently score his points against whoever’s guarding him.

Even with his mass n strength, Howard has a reputation for playing better against some guys (see Andrew Bynym) than others, as was proven to be the case against Kendrick Perkins in the semifinals n even recently when the Magic came to Oracle n Howard struggled against our very own (God bless him) Chris Hunter n our resident Anthony Randolph.

But the same thing can’t be said for Monta: when has he ever encountered any semblance of a struggle against any individual defender, let alone a consistent one? What about the (dazzling) 33 pts he scored on 12-23 shooting with Mickael Pietrus (who’s recently established himself as one of the better wing defenders in the league) all over him recently in the very same Magic/Warriors game?

Actually, another reason I wouldn’t trade for Howard is that I feel we already have a very solid starting center in Andris Biedrins (when healthy). In fact, I feel Andris is one of the most underrated players in the league. I’ve always felt that if the Warriors’ coaching staff would just make more of an effort to run plays for Andris, he could lift his scoring average to 20 ppg. He n Ellis have always worked beautifully together, n here’s holding out hope that their chemistry playing together for the first time since Jax was shipped will continue to flourish enough so that Ellis n Andris can form a Kobe/Shaq-like connection for the remainder of their careers together.

by Krazee max on Dec 10, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

As far as your trade proposal of Ellis for Howard, I wouldn’t make that trade. Ever.

Assuming you mean you wouldn’t give up Ellis to get Howard, this puts you at odds with more or less the entire basketball world. I am rather certain that any GM past or present, when presented with that option would trade to acquire Howard while giving up Monta. (assuming that they could make the cap numbers work) The only thing that could prevent it would be if the GM died of a heart-attack from the shock that someone would actually be willing to part with Howard for Monta.

As dominant as Howard is though, he’s still a very flawed player.

Far less flawed than Monta.

Howard is not as adept at doing this as Monta Ellis (our own best defensive player),

OK, now I know that you’re either Monta Ellis, his agent, or a complete and total crank. Monta’s been trying harder this year, but he’s nobody’s best defensive player. If he is, you can expect to struggle to win 20 something games.

by jae on Dec 10, 2009 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

a Kobe/Shaq-like connection

Haha. You’’ll be here all night…

Crazy man, a few pieces of advice for the next time you decide to spam the board with your crazy talk.

1.
Repeating the same point, multiple times, does not make it any more persuasive or interesting. Indeed, it makes it much less so. Try to say your piece once, as clearly and concisely as possible, and move on.

2.
There’s nothing wrong with having an idiosyncratic minority opinion. But when you cling to it the way you do, with blind disregard for the majority view, the overwhelming body of evidence, or common sense, it starts to seem like extremism, or zealotry. I doubt there’s a single regular poster on this board, or a single NBA GM, who would even consider taking Monta Ellis over Dwight Howard (or a single GM who would say Monta is better than Kobe, or who would call Monta “the next Jordan,” etc.) It may make you feel cool to be the one person in the hoops world with your view. But if you’re interested in real dialogue, or real synthesis of ideas, or anything that relates to reality, it really behooves you to open your eyes to the world, listen to what other people are saying, and shut your yap a little.

3.
Despite your protests to the contrary, your posts are not “eloquent.” Being kind, one might call them “loquacious.” (adj. “talkative or chatty, especially of persons given to excess conversation”). Being blunt: well, quite apart from your weird little issue with the “n-word,” your writing needs a ton of work. Problem is, as jae points out, your critical thinking seems to need even more. But keep at it!

(Whoops, slow on the draw. What jae said.)

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 10, 2009 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

My two greatest foils...

Jae n Sleepy Freud. You guys are the worst! You never cease to amaze me with your burgeoning list of forays into less n less Monta Ellis, Warriors, n even basketball-related topics. Just when I feel I’ve made progress in effectively comminucating my point, you guys chime in with your “holier than thou” digressions into assesments on critical thinking, use of the “n-word”, definitions of words like “loquacious”, n basically everything else but the (non-basketball related) kitchen sink. Frankly, I dunno what the hell you guys are talking about sometimes.

When did I ever protest that my points were “eloquent”? The only thing I’ve ever protested on this board is my outspoken belief that Monta Ellis is underrated n taken for granted by Warriors Nation. Sure, I’m in the minority in my opinion that Ellis is an elite top-3 player in this league (certainly one that’s better than Dwight Howard). And you guys may find my impulse to defend my opinion when it’s argued against annoying. But… at least I have an opinion on Monta Ellis (or more broadly, the Warriors, or even moreso, basketball) that I’m expressing in my posts.

You guys on the other hand have become so taken back by this incessant self-defense that you’ve veered deeper n deeper into personal attacks on my character n apparently decided it’s more about showing off your credentials for jobs as English teachers than arguing about Monta Ellis (or the Warriors, or even basketball).

Rather than entertain a diplomatic back-n-forth on Monta Ellis’ greatness (the subject of this board), you guys would rather entertain your very obnoxious fixations with the ways in which I communicate my opinion. Why should you care about a detail as minute as my natural inclination to spell “and” phonetically? Have you never seen anyone do this in a non-formal online platform before? Why are you defining “loquacious” for me? I know what that word means. I’m not here because I want to see you guys define adjectives.

Is any of this because I made a comment above that used the word eloquent? That was many posts ago. You guys are making that sentence out to be Obama wants to send more troops into Afghanistan. I wasn’t trying to offend anyone or insult your Monta Ellis (or Warriors, or basketball-related) opinion when I said that word. By the way, eloquent means “forcefully expressive”. I know I can be forcefully expressive. Clearly, you guys have taken offense to my demonstration of it here. But at least I’m not putting anyone down or dismissing anyone because of their writing, or the terms they’ve used to articulate their point, or because I have a very inappropriate fascination with the letters “a” n “d” n I feel anyone else is shortchanging them.

Get over yourselves, guys. If you’re Monta Ellis (or Warriors, or basketball) opinions are different from my own n u wanna express them, go right ahead. But do me n everyone else who posts here a favor n reserve all your condescending inclinations n ego-stroking passages to your journals. Nobody here wants to see that you guys aspire to be English professors.

by Krazee max on Dec 10, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions  

geez Krazee

So i got a Q for you. If Monta is the 3rd best player in the league (and your first 2 are Lebron and Dwade). Why are the warriors PATHETICALLY BAD.

-Lebron’s supporting cast is harding anything to write home about but see what he’s doing?

-DWade’s supporting cast is possibly worse than the warriors yet he has them above .500.

So how come the Warriors led by the 3rd best player in NBA can’t even get near .500 (currently 7-14 puts them on pace for 27 wins).

Everyone here likes Monta, some more than others. But fact you think he’s on par with these 2, who lead awful teams to playoffs is a little ridiculous. Personally I think with right surrounding peices he can lead us to playoffs. Then I dunno, i don’t know how much he can grow. Can he grow to level or iverson/dwade, leading teams to finals? I don’t know but I can’t make that judgement now. I just know he is by far our most talented player and I want to build around him unless someone comes offering us Dwight howard, CP3, Lebron etc.

Look man, I like you passion and you bring a different perspective which is nice, but just admit, Monta is NOT the 3rd best player in the NBA or you really have zero credibility.

by tafkasam on Dec 10, 2009 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...

first of all, the Western Conference is stacked. The East has gotten more competitive recently, but it’s still not on par with the West, in terms of how many legitimate playoff contenders there are (look at Houston, they’re right in the thick of the mix at number 5, without their two superstars. San Antonio’s currently looking outside in at 9th place (Oklahoma City’s in 8th)!

Another thing is that the days when the Cavaliers could be considered an awful team are officially a few years behind us. Indeed, this is the second consecutive season they’re a prominent fixture in the championship conversation. Though I personally believe they’re still not ready to challlenge Boston, Orlando, n LA, they’re certainly taking steps forward (remember that Leon Powe is gonna join them in February).

As far as D-Wade’s Heat are concerned, they do have a better record than the Warriors, but at 11-10, they really aren’t that much better off. That’s good enough for 5th place in the weaker Eastern Conference, but that would only be good enough for 8th or 9th place in the Warriors’ West (OKC is 12-9 by the way). Also, the Heat appear to be on their way down more than anything, when you consider the fabulous fashion with which they started the season.

I’m not knocking D-Wade. I do believe he, Ellis, n James are the league’s 3 best players. The problem with the Heat (and the Warriors, for that matter) is that, relying on only one star to carry you to a season of any sort of significant achievement (e.g. a two-round playoff stint) in an age where the contending teams have a mininum of 3 All-Stars is a lot to ask. The Heat proved it last year against Atlanta. Such is currently the case with Monta Ellis’ Warriors.

Aside from the fact that the youthful Warriors are relying on Monta’s phenomenal talents to carry them through a young season in the league’s superior conference, Ellis has the extra disadvantage (unlike LBJ or D-Wade) of playing on a banged-up team. Sure, D-Wade is also leading an inexperienced group (this has never been true of LBJ in the pros, by the way), but at least his team’s been out on the floor with him!

I also think your dismissal of Ellis’ ability to lead his team into the postseason is premature. You’re basing this conclusion more on a sense of frustration with the team’s recent string of misfortune than on any history of precedence. That is to say, there is no precedence for any arguement that Ellis can’t lead his team to the playoffs because, seeing as how he’s only been the team’s leader for the last 11-12 games post-Jax, we don’t know that for a fact.

We can’t justifiably say that Ellis is incapable of leading his team into the playoffs unless they actually don’t make it this year. Now I personally believe (and Ellis has recently corroborated this belief) that the Warriors aren’t out of the playoff picture. I believe, like Ellis does, that as long as they continue to play with effort and wear their hearts on their sleeves every night, when they actually do welcome back their two centers into the mix, they’ll have a chance to turn their present gloomy situation around. Like Ellis recently said, we just miss Andris Biedrins, man.

by Krazee max on Dec 12, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Unless I misunderstood, you used the word eloquent to describe your own writing:

…my own eloquent posts…

Can’t speak for jae, but in my book, when you crow about your your eloquence, your eloquence (or lack thereof) becomes fair game.

Also speaking just for myself: you’re probably right that I’ve been a bit too personal — or at least “mean” — in a few of my responses to you. At the same time, rarely does anyone on this site display as little regard for reality and basic common sense as you have on the question of Monta Ellis. Though you haven’t really attacked me personally (and I commend you for that), my basic sense of fairness and logic is offended. I mean, if this were a conversation between you and me, I wouldn’t really care. You can believe what you want to believe. But this is a public forum; and I think any news site, even a silly sports blog like this, deserves a much stronger basis in reality than your posts here have shown.

As for the “and” thing … is “n” really how you pronounce it? I mean, it’s probably close to that in a standard pairing like “Amos n Andy” or “Peanut Butter n Jelly,” but in most cases it’s more or less articluated, even in informal speech. More importantly, from a reader’s perspective, all those free-floating "n"s are just incredibly distracting. A bit like the Monta=Jordan thing, the affectation smacks of an adherence to extreme idiosyncrasy at the expense of basic respect for the real world.

Anyway, I’m done here. Sorry again if my attacks veered on personal. Last word is yours if you want it.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 10, 2009 9:13 PM PST up reply actions  

It's cool, man.

I know I’m extremely passionate about the things I’m passionate about, n I can get carried away too. But what I never intend is for my outspoken expression of my opinions to alienate and/or offend the people I’m trying to engage. Afterall, it’s you guys that have engaged me to express my opinions in the first place with your own and if it weren’t for you guys, this forum would be dead.

Anyway, I respect you guys’ opinions and try to internalize them as long as they don’t stray into personal territory and cheap shots, too. And it isn’t just you guys that have to put up with my adoration of Ellis, I drive pretty much everyone I’m close to krazee with the subject as well. I have a $20 bet with a skeptical cousin as well, that says Ellis has a breakout season that puts him among the elite. The conditions for the bet are All-Star, Top 3 in scoring (though I’ve gone so far as to say top 1) n playoffs. So I guess I have more personal stakes in Ellis’ rise than most that sways my feelings too. :D

Yea, unless you speak English very properly (which is unusual), people generally don’t enunciate the “a” n “d” when they pronounce “and”. It’s like “I’m” (contraction of I am). You actually pronounce it “am”, which is usually the way I write it on informal platforms as well (though I’ve consciously avoided it here to elude future scrutiny). lmao. But if you notice, these are the way you unconsciously pronounce these things.

by Krazee max on Dec 10, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions  

pretty much with sleepy said.....

Kobe’s scoring efficiency is always among top of guards.

Career TS% (and keep in mind kobe had more down years early cause he was so young when he entered the league)

Kobe- .558 (since 2004 it’s been in the high .560s)
BRoy- .552
Dwade- .564
MJ- .569

When kobe has the ball, he scores as efficiently as any guard in the league

by tafkasam on Dec 4, 2009 7:49 AM PST up reply actions  

not so krazee after all

Ellis will never be better than Bryant just because of Ellis’ lesser strength and jumping ability. And Ellis will not lead the league in scoring this year. That will be Melo Wade Dirk Bosh or LeBron. But all that stuff about Kobe being very overrated is true. Firstly, as far as Kobe’s offensive repertoire and jumpshot, he developed that over many years of taking 19+ shots a game. His 4th year was not lost to injury like Ellis’, other than that their scoring is on a similar track plus or minus kick-outs from Shaq in his prime. Look at Kobe’s career assist 4.6 to turnovers 2.9. What’s Hall of Fame about that? And as for Jordan comparisons, come on! If Jordan played with the 1996-2004 Shaq, with all those Laker vets (Horace Grant, Rick Fox, Dennis Rodman, Robert Horry, Fisher, Karl Malone, Gary Payton, Eddie Jones, Nick Van Exel, a young Fisher) rotating in through the years, they would get only 3 rings in 8 years? At least 5 with Jordan instead of Bryant. Melo Paul Wade and LeBron are all better than Kobe. Wade won it with the 2006 Shaq, Haslem, Jason Williams, Posey, a worn out Zo and freaking Antoine Walker (where is he now?) Bryant is lucky he wasn’t in Jordan’s era, he would have the championship success of Clyde Drexler. Oh also I guess people forgot about the missed playoffs in 05 after Bryant broke up the dynasty with his general character (among other things, no means no, and why is your wife a video girl you took to her prom when you were 21 anyway?) and forgot about the 2 CONSECUTIVE 1st round eliminations by the Suns with Odom on the Lakers! All of a sudden he gets all-Star level PF Gasol, Ariza, and one of the top 5 centers today healthy, and he ‘did it without Shaq’! Look who you did it with! My teenage little cousins have a nickname for Bryant, inspired by his pose on one of his video game covers: Disco Fish Rapist Ballhog Cocky Jerky Ass. Now that’s easy to say 5 times fast. Or more……………

Dump Maggette get a pick go shopping in 2011= NBA Champions 2013

by polar on Dec 5, 2009 2:49 AM PST up reply actions  

YES!

I couldn’t have said it better myself! As much as I’ve tried to reiterate the same point regarding Kobe’s excessive flaws, I think you finally hit the head on the nail (is that the expression I’m looking for??)! As far as your assertions that LeBron, Wade, Paul, n Melo are all better players (albeit, with far less help) than Bryant, I couldn’t agree with u more! In fact, I’d even go so far as to add Tim Duncan (as Missing Barry mentioned below), Paul Pierce (the 2008 Finals proved it), Deron Williams, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Baron Davis, n lastly (obviously), Monta Ellis to the list of active players superior to Bryant.

Where you n I diverge is on your assesment of Ellis’ potential relative to Bryant’s. I believe that Ellis is already better than Bryant (by a lot), n that he’ll eventually be better than James, Wade, n Melo
as well. As I’ve already mentioned on this page, Ellis is simply quicker, more explosive, more athletic, more talented, more durable (I mean he recently played 169 consecutive minutes, while leading the team in the points, assists, n steals categories), n just more dominant overall an offensive player than Bryant ever was (n at this point in his career, ever will be, frankly).

I feel this way for a multitude of reasons. I realize it may seem extremely too soon to make such an assesment considering the short time he’s been in the league relative to Bryant, but I see a lot of things in Monta I’ve never seen in Kobe. Also, considering what enormous individual success he’s had establishing himself as such a dominant player in the short wake of Jax’s absence, I think it’s only fair to keep an open-mind to the possibility that Ellis’ ceiling is much more ambitious.

Remember, he’s only been the (undisputed) leader of the team for just a few weeks now. Look what what he’s done to some of the elite Western Conference teams he’s recently run into. Or even before the moped injury, when he was still surrounded by players (Davis, Harrington, n Jax) who were inhibiting his progress before the moped accident. Look at how he stood out amongst his team vs the eventual-champion Celtics on February 20, 2008. Or even when they met the Celtics (and lost) @ Boston in December 2007, when Monta was the only player who provided any sort of resistence as everyone else seemingly packed it in (Ellis scored 21 on 10-15 shooting that blowout loss). His ENTIRE February 2008. How about his tear during January-February 2008 when he averaged 28-29 ppg on 70% shooting for a stretch of 10 consecutive home games at Oracle Arena? Has Bryant EVER managed even remotely similar numbers??

I also disagree that Ellis won’t be leading the league in scoring as soon as this season (nevermind in the coming 10 years). I feel he will, n it’s gonna be a lot more natural than his fans realize. Ellis is unstoppable. He became the first player since Jordan to score 40+ points @ San Antonio in the Popovich era. His postgame response? He said his mom told him to have that kind of game. The career-high 45/apparent 50 he recently notched vs the best-shot blocking team/5th best defensive team in the league? His wife told him to do it. His back-to-back 65 n 72-pt games Vs his state rivals (@ the other team’s gym)? He was taunted by fans of the other team from the audience before the games. LMAO!!!

I’ve said it before n I’ll say it again, Ellis is a unique player. The sky is his ceiling. He’s gonna do a lot of things (much like Jordan always did over the coarse of his special career) that people won’t expect. Leading the league in scoring after being given his first shot as the team’s focal point will be one of those phenomenal accomplishments (MJ, though he didn’t lead the league in scoring as a Rookie, in fact did score more total points than anyone else with 2,313 overall). Can Ellis notch 2,313 this season? Maybe, maybe not (he’s currently in 8th place with 430 points). But I’ll tell u one thing: he can very well score more total points than anyone else (with great ease at that). Remember, he was at a disadvantage the first 9 games of the season when Stephen Jax jacked up all the shots.

After the recent Indiana game, Ellis said something that really got my attention… he said "I was born to do that (score 45-50 pts). That doesn’t impress me. I’ve been doin that my whole life… " After he proceeded to recount some of the many fascinating stories of his high school exploits (namely, the back-to-back 65 n 72- both wins by the way), he then said something that made me really, really happy… "There will be a lot of nights when I will score 45. There will be a lot of times I score 50… " Well, it’s not so much that I was surprised he said this- in fact, I always had the same feeling myself. It’s that I know he’s finally ready to do it.

MJ scored at least 40 pts 37 times when he led the league in scoring in 1987 (when he scored 3,041 pts). He scored at least 40 pts 16 times the following year in 1988. He led the league in 40-pt games both years. I believe Ellis is more than capable of falling somewhere in between with his total output of 40-pt performances this season. Will he score 50 pts as many times as MJ did in 1987 (8)? I dunno. But I wouldn’t put it passed him. You shouldn’t either!!

by Krazee max on Dec 5, 2009 10:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Dude. You’ve made your point. Now stop wasting people’s time and embarrassing yourself.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 5, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

1. To say that a player is “overrated” — without specifying a very clear “by whom” — is to rely on a highly anecdotal and unscientific impression of what his actual rating is. This kind of statement, therefore, cannot really be “true” or “false.” I suspect the majority of basketball fans are aware that Kobe, while a fabulous player, is not quite in the same class as Bird, Magic, Jordan, or LeBron (and, in terms of impact on a teams’ wins, not in the same class as the dominant bigs: Russell, Wilt, Kareem, Shaq, Duncan).

2. The statement “Kobe is overrated” is what we like to call around these parts “a lame and transparent straw man.” Which is to say: nobody in this thread ever said otherwise. (I mean, we are Warrior fans, after all…) The straw man was trotted out in support of patently ridiculous statement “Monta Ellis is better than Kobe Bryant,” which of course is quite a different statement from “Kobe is overrated.” Zero evidence in support of the notion that Monta Ellis is a better or more valuable player than Kobe Bryant has yet been provided, though a lot of barely coherent sentences have been strung together to assert it.

3. Childish namecalling like “Rapist Ballhog Jerky Ass” tends to reinforce the notion that the writer is rather immature, rather silly fanboy, rather than a thoughtful dude interested in having a real discussion based on logic, fairness, or insight.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 5, 2009 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

It’s not uncommon to hear people refer to Bryant as the best player in the game. I’ve hear it said on broadcasts that he’s “without question” the best. Since I do not believe this to be true, it
“overrates him” even though he is a very, very, very good player, among the best.

by jae on Dec 5, 2009 1:10 PM PST up reply actions  

OK...

Firstly, I agree with everything you said in your first paragraph, about use of the term “overrated” denoting a premise that isn’t scientific. This is true. I do realize that calling a player or thing “overrated” (or “underrated”) is to acknowledge the public perception of said player or thing. It is precisely based upon this logic (that any public perception is nothing more than an emphatic opinion) that I’ve drawn my concluding arguement regarding Monta’s superiority as a player to Kobe (whether it’s as a better overall player, or one that’s simply more valuable to his team).

To start, a stat-by-stat comparison (taking into consideration ppg, fg%, rpg, apg, n spg) of each of their first few seasons will reveal that the two players are quite level, n should be used as a pretty accurate measurement tool for discerning the relative overall skill/quality of the two as individual players (or basically, neglecting to factor their value to their respective teams).

Kobe 1996-1997: 7.6 ppg (42%), 1,9 rpg, 1.3 apg, 0.7 spg
Kobe 1997-1998: 15.4 ppg (43%), 3.1 rpg, 2.5 apg, 0.9 spg
Kobe 1998-1999: 19.9 ppg (46%), 5.3 rpg, 3.8 apg, 1.4 spg
Kobe 1999-2000: 22.5 ppg (47%), 6.3 rpg, 4.9 apg, 1.6 spg

Monta 2005-2006: 6.8 ppg (42%), 2.1 rpg, 1.6 apg, 0.6 spg
Monta 2006-2007: 16.5 ppg (48%), 3.2 rpg, 4.1 apg, 1.7 spg
Monta 2007-2008: 20.2 ppg, (53%), 5.0 rpg, 3.9 apg, 1.5 spg
Monta 2009-2010 (so far): (46%) 23.9 ppg, 4.4 rpg, 5.2 apg, 2.4 spg

Bear in mind two things: Bryant played in 71 games (6 starts) as a rookie n Ellis played in 49 games (3 starts) as a rookie, n also that seeing as how Ellis’ 2008-2009 season was lost due to injury (he played in 25 games), n Kobe’s 1999-2000 season was not so much (he played in 66 games), I’ve omitted Ellis’ legitimate fourth season from the analysis (not because I’m biased towards Ellis, simply because it would be unreasonable to believe that Ellis’ steep decline in production relative to Bryant’s in his own 4th year, is attributable to anything other than the lingering effects of the recuperation process from a major surgery).

Having said that, I think an overview of the above stat lines from the players’ first four seasons are pretty indicative of the fact that, up to those points in the careers of the two players, they’ve faired quite evenly. In some cases (notably fg% n spg), I would even venture to say Ellis’ lines yield a clear advantage. On this note, it would consequently seem unreasonable to believe that in the plentiful remaining years of Ellis’ career, he can not at least continue to hang with- if not completely overcast- Bryant’s subsequent 5-14 full seasons in the league (that is to say, barring any further unfortunate setbacks due to major season-altering injuries/surgeries).

As far as the other standard for measuring the players’ comparable quality/skill I’ve mentioned above- the question of who’s more valuable to his team- I have already referenced the fact that Ellis is the current leader of his team in four different categories (mpg, ppg, rpg, apg) several times above. I have also challenged anyone (who cares enought to try to undermine my opinion) to look up Bryant’s stats from either this season, or any prior season in his career, and find where Kobe simultaneously led his team in so much as half as many statistical categories as Ellis currently is. If you feel I’m wasting your time by prompting you to respond with long, elaborate responses to my own eloquent posts, it’s because you’re simply not paying attention. :P

So to conclude, now that we’ve effectively agreed on the fact that “overrated” delinates nothing more than an opinion/perception of someone for somebody/something, n I’ve subsequently drawn upon statistical (or scientific) data to effectively rule out the publicly perceived wide gap in the level of games between Kobe n Monta (at least in the beginning of their careers) as just that, nothing more than an empty perception, devoid of any valid substance or merit whatsoever (basically an illusion), I think we can attempt to rule out any arguements that Kobe is (or, has ever been) better than- or even as good- as Monta…

So, I think we’re very much on the same page, here. Scientific/statistical data should in fact be the backing criteria by which two players are always compared when attempting to determine who’s the superior baller.

Also, on a more personal note, I don’t feel the least bit embarassed expressing my outspoken feelings with regards to this issue on this blog site. I’m simply letting off some steam on this awesome page by having an enthusiastic debate. This is fun for me! Sure, I’m stubborn when I believe something n others openly disagree. It’s fun to talk n debate basketball, man. I love Monta Ellis. He’s my favorite player in the NBA. I think he’s a top-3 player in the league, n I’ll be damned if anybody wants to take me to task for my opinion! But that’s the whole point. That’s why this is such a great outlet for my personality. The only thing in your recent post that I really take exception to is your dismissal of my arguments as mererly being “barely coherent sentences strung together” to make my point. I consider myself to be a pretty good writer n I resent that.

by Krazee max on Dec 5, 2009 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

We get it. You’re a big Ellis fan. But your argument that he’s among the top three players in the league is just, what’s the right word here? “Lame.” There is no legitimate statisical arugment to support the notion that Monta is better than Kobe.

And no one who consistently uses the letter “n” in place of the word “and” should refer to his prose as “eloquent”.

by jae on Dec 5, 2009 3:00 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

So what’s changed?

Frankly, I don’t think a whole lot has changed that needs explanation. I think losing Jack improved teamwork a little bit. Ellis has obviously been playing well. More than anything, though, is the Warriors were just playing poorly earlier and were bound to start playing better in a lot of ways. I was adamantly against those people calling us a 20-25 win team 8 games into the season, telling them we were simply bound to play better, we were too talented to. And look, now we have. It doesn’t really need explaining, it was simply bound to happen. I don’t think a whole lot has “changed”, per se, other than finally playing better basketball (as they knew how to do all along)….

by Missing Barry on Dec 3, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I couldn't disagree with u more

What’s changed is CLEARLY that Monta Ellis, as a result of Jackson’s departure, has been given the go to realize the max of his potential. Again, I realize I’m repeating myself, but I truly do feel that Ellis is a unique player (relative to everyone else in the league today) and that his production IMMEDIATELY post-Jack is indicative of the difference. Whereas Ellis was (still) a VERY good- if much more inhibited- player (certainly not a leader, vocal or otherwise) when Jax, Davis, Harrington, etc. (all of whom demanded probably more touches than they deserved which resulted in wasted posessions time n again as the Warriors played with reckless abandon that resulted in empty results – L’s), were around on the wing, the post-Jax Warriors are very different, n u can see it. With Ellis now at the center of the team’s gameplan, there’s a greater focus, on both ends of the floor for one (as Ellis has stepped up his defense in addition to his offense to the point he’s become the team’s go-to defender vs the other team’s leader, whether it’s Kobe or Granger), n in the all-around ball-movement/offensive rhythm of the team. With Ellis (n of coarse, Curry, the team’s point guard) carrying the ball up n down the court n Ellis’ rare Jordan/Wade/James-esque ability to get to the rim virtually every posession he has the ball at the slightest will (see the youtube highlight reels from the recent Mavericks, Spurs, n Pacers games on Orangino’s channel), there’s a better balance in terms of an inside-outside attack among the two slashers than there was when Jax (who led the league in turnovers n often seemed allergic to making the passing effort) was around. Also, Ellis is CLEARLY (seriously) the team’s first n second offensive options for the team since it’s been established that with his significant ball-handling abilities n abilities to either get to the rim or pull-up with a mid-range shot to score, he’s the unquestionable best player on the floor for them. Indeed, Ellis’ ability to take over a game recently affected the favorable outcomes of their recent games vs Portland, Dallas, n Indiana- all of which saw him go for 30+- n even the near-favorable one against the Spurs @ San Antonio (when he went for 40+). This is because the drop-off between Ellis n the next best offensive player on the team this year is steep (post-Jax). This has resulted in a more focused n composed team because unlike during the days when Jax was running around robbing everyone else of their adequate amount of opportunites n the offense was all helter-skelter, the Warriors now have a more conventionally structured team strategy which revolves around their (irrefutbale) best player doing his best to pace the team’s offensive (and defensive) rhythm by working to guage what’s the best thing to do for himself and his supporting cast (e.g. make the pass to the outside shooter waiting on the wing) in the context of the team’s offense on a game-by-game basis. Jax was the team’s captain, but for some reason, seemingly REFUSED to recognize the responsibility of appropriately initiating everything extended this way to include everyone else. Ellis does. They’re just more organized now, really. It’s no different a situation than the ones are in Cleveland with James, n in Miami with Wade, now. As Ellis goes, now, FINALLY, so do the Warriors (this has been the case for only a few weeks now). And frankly, I happen to believe that the kid’s a REAL competitor (not unlike Jordan, James, n/or Wade) n that however daunting the challenge of leading them to championships may seem (now) over the coarse of his career, he will meet- and even exceed- them (again, much like MJ in the early years of his career). I see multiple championships for Ellis n the Bay Area team in the coming years. He’s gonna retire a very, very successful Warrior when it’s all been said n done.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 7:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I just thought

Monta ran circles around Brandon Roy and limited Kobe to just 20 points. Watch their games
again if you had them recorded.

S

by sadiri on Dec 4, 2009 7:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Not Sure

I’m not sure if Ellis will be one this year, hopefully in the future. He might have a good chance because Yao Ming and Shaq won’t be competing (I know their centers) which could leave a spot for the center and a spot for another guard. Brandon Roy and Chauncey Billups are going to make the team, which the last two spots are tied between Steve Nash (very good season, #1 team in the NBA), Tony Parker, Deron Williams (who should be one already) and Monta Ellis. Those 4 guards will probably compete for the last 2 guards on the bench, so I’m not sure Ellis will be an all star. In my opinion, D-Will, Steve Nash, Brandon Roy, Chauncey Billups, CP3, and Kobe are going to make the Western confrence guards, but that’s my opinion.

by DubsFan408 on Dec 1, 2009 3:21 PM PST reply actions  

True Shooting Percentage

PTS / (2 * (FGA + 0.44 * FTA)
It’s a very accurate way to determine how many points a player scores per shot attempt. (i.e. how efficient they are at scoring points)

by philthiest on Dec 3, 2009 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s a very accurate way to determine how many points a player scores per shot attempt.

Just chiming in for those that missed it in that statement. In this context “shot attempts” also include FGAs where the player was fouled without converting the shot and not FGA was recorded as a result.

by jae on Dec 5, 2009 8:31 AM PST up reply actions  

True shooting percentage — the best and most accepted measure of what you call “field goal efficiency.”

True shooting percentage takes into account two-point attempts, three-point attempts and free throws attempts to get an all inclusive idea of how well a basketball player shoots.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Dec 3, 2009 6:27 PM PST up reply actions  

As far as Kobe's TS% is concerned...

He clearly was the worst of the 5 last year. Aside from that note which I pointed out, I have to admit I am surprised at how well he faired the previous 2 seasons (from 2006-2008, all of which ended in great disappointments for Bryant n his team, but I digress). I am also absolutely NOT surprised by any subsequent disparities between Bryant n Ellis you’ve alluded to thereafter, seeing as how Bryant’s- being the focal point of his team as opposed to Ellis’ in his first 4 years- numbers are padded by the fact that unlike Ellis, who came up playing alongside Baron Davis, Al Harrington, Jason Richardson, Jamal Crawford, Mickael Pietrus, n Stephen “ballhog” Jackson, Bryant post- Shaq had only Odom n a bunch of scrubs to defer to during his 2005-2007 seasons (while Bynum was still finding his way). Meanwhile, Ellis is only NOW since Stephen Jax was shipped to hell-out-of-here in a comparable situation to Bryant (or James and Wade post-Shaq for that matter), in that he has now (immediately as I had excitedly anticipated when the trade happened) become the undisputed focal point (indeed, he’s the first n second options) of his team since Jax was moved; it’s why I was absolutely elated when I heard Jax was traded- I realized the team was officially being turned over to ME8. So basically, I’m arguing that now being given the opportunity to lead a team (n not have to defer to the all-star to his right or left), Ellis’ career statistics will even out with Bryant’s output to the point that they’ll eventually exceed Bryant’s in any facet (including not only assists n points per game, but rebounds since Ellis is also an exceptional rebounder for his height, in addition to his already obvious superior efficiency as a shooter- the stuff I mentioned above). Just give the kid time.

by Krazee max on Dec 3, 2009 6:55 PM PST reply actions  

failure in 2007-8?

cmon. lets compare teams….

celtics had a veteran team with 3 superstars in there prime dying to win a championship. Lakers had kobe, enigatic odom and gasol (who had joined the team 3 months earlier)…. you can’t really understate the fact Gasol had barely played w/ lakers…. ALso compare supporting casts… ROndo>Fisher. Posey>Ariza/Walton (then), Perkins>Turiaf

by tafkasam on Dec 4, 2009 7:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Sorry...

if you’re the so-called “greatest player in the world” in Kobe, I think you CAN understate the fact that Gasol (an All-Star n one of the most dominant centers in the league since joing the Lakers) had barely played with the Lakers, especially if you’re comparing Bryant to MJ, who throughout the coarse of his career (especially having never played with a center even remotely resembling the calibur level of Gasol), CONSISTENTLY did much, much more with less than Bryant. MJ won six championships with the likes of Bill Cartwright, Stacy King, Bryan Williams, Bill Wennington, Luc Longley, etc. at the 5 position. Are you trying to convince me that Bryant can’t win ONE (his first post-Shaq) in 2008 with the likes of not only Gasol (with whom the difference in the ratio of wins to losses since being traded to LA midway through the season is something like 27-8 respectively, 5 of those losses coming with Gasol out in mid-March with a hamstring injury thing), but also Lamar Odom (a Scottie Pippen-calibur player that had previously starred for 2 other teams), n the highest-scoring/most productive bench in ALL of the league that season? Sorry, I don’t buy it, especially against a team that’s playing in its first year together (in the Big 3). There should be 0 excuses for Bryant’s legendary failures during that one series, from the terribly embarassing Game 4 loss @ STAPLES to the 39-pt blowout loss in the 6th n deciding game, second in highest margin of defeat in a Finals victory to- ironically enough- only the Utah Jazz in ‘97 or ’98, who lost to Jordan’s Bulls by 41 in one of those games. If you’re the renowned “best player in the world”, n the “leader of you team” (another Bryant allegation I whole-heartedly refute with regards to his role on that team, given the ridiculous collection of talent on they have since Gasol arrived), n have just won your first MVP that regular season, you don’t sit idly by as the 4th best player on the floor (behind the Celtics’ Big 3), and watch as you’re team drowns in a historic fashion. I GUARANTEE you that Monta Ellis- whom I’ve aready expressed my firm belief above will win multiple championships over the coarse of his career as well- will NEVER allow his team to meet a similar fate in a similar situation with parallel stakes/circumstances (e.g. a Playoff series) so long as he’s the leader of his team, no matter how outmatched they may appear to be.

by Krazee max on Dec 4, 2009 10:32 AM PST reply actions  

Calling Lamar Odom a Scottie Pippen-caliber player is about as ridiculous as that last guarantee (and your general overhyping of Ellis, in general, a player who I like, but has flaws). I don’t think anyone has said Kobe was/is as good as MJ, by the way. I don’t even think any of the people that have been talking to you would say Kobe has ever been the best player in the league, when there’s someone like Tim Duncan around…

by Missing Barry on Dec 4, 2009 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

hmm

Lamar Odom is just as versatile- if not morseo- than Pippen. The reason being, he can play all 5 positions on the floor about as good as anyone that ever played the game. Also, much like Pippen during the post-MJ-first-retirement-period, Odom’s been the star/focal point of at least one team (the Clippers n Heat). Why Odom’s never been an All-Star is actually a mystery to me (in fact, I only recently discovered this to be the case).

As far as the Kobe-MJ comparison you’ve just denounced, I certainly agree with u that it’s ridiculous. And that Duncan’s been the better, more dominant player (than KB24) over the course of a career. Having said that, I refuse to believe u’ve never heard the comparison in the media (whether on ESPN, from the commentators on any n every Lakers game of the last seven or so years,etc.). If I recall correctly, one of the headlining topics of discussion on ESPN the day after the Celtics’ (convincing) clinching defeat of the LA Lakers in 2008 was “Will the Kobe/Jordan comparisons finally come to an end now?”, or something to that effect. So I mean, unless you’ve been living in a closet since the Lakers started winning championships in the early 00’s (or even since Kobe’s sophomore season when MJ was in his last season), you’ve surely heard, or had the subject of a comparison between the two guards mentioned n harped on in your presence in one form or another. I do agree that Duncan’s the (far) superior player, but unfortunately (n again), due to the Jordan comparisons, his perceived greatness has always paled in comparison to Bryant’s (in the eyes of the media anyway); it’s the primary reason the Lakers were almost as heavy favorites going into the Celtics series 2 years ago as they were going into the Magic one last Spring- Bryant is considered to be > everyone else (for some reason).

I’ll do u one better though. I’m so big on Ellis, I believe (n have believed since the 2007-2008 season), that he’s the new Jordan! And I’m a HUGE fan of Jordan! Let’s hope he proves me right! :D

by Krazee max on Dec 4, 2009 10:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Just to get into the Pippen/Odom thing a little bit:

I think Pippen was better offensively, but they’re fairly similar in that. Pippen had an edge in assists and scored at a higher volume, and they were pretty equal in scoring efficiency. Odom is a better rebounder – but he also plays PF primarily, whereas Pippen was a 3. I don’t know what league averages are, but I imagine Pippen’s 6.6 rebounds/36 compared to the average 3 and Odom’s 8.7 rebounds/36 compared to the average 4 leave them in pretty similar spots. Maybe it’s fair to bump Odom’s rebounding up some, since it was weaker earlier in his career (when he played more 3) and stronger late (when he’s almost exclusively playing 4).

Defensively, though, Pippen leaves Odom in the dust. Pippen was probably the greatest wing defender in the history of basketball. He caused absolute havoc out there – sometimes guarding 1’s to completely disrupt the other teams offense, other times shutting down the opponents best wing…Pippen was a monster on defense. Odom has some versatility defensively, I’ll give you that, but he’s that good a defender at any specific position, really. Overall, that leaves him well short of being a “Pippen-caliber player”.

by Missing Barry on Dec 7, 2009 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

Pip is, besides MJ, the greatest wing defender of all-time. He gets the nod over Odom in this department, indeed. But I think the mere fact that we can have a debate on the comparability of the two players serves to reinforce my point about how Kobe had more to work with for the 3 seasons between Shaq’s absense n Gasol’s arrival than people give credit to.

If you’re the “best player in the world” by popular consensus, n have an Odom/Pippen in your lineup, plus one of the most effective centers in the league in Gasol, along with another solid backup big in Ronny Turiaf, who’s supported by the rest of the most productive second unit in the league that season, you shouldn’t be making a historic ass out of yourself on the biggest stage in the basketball world against anybody. Let alone a team that’s been playing together for only one season. You really shouldn’t.

by Krazee max on Dec 7, 2009 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

To be fair to Kobe – I think his approach has improved since that post-Shaq, pre-Gasol era. He shoots less (and thus takes better shots in general) and distributes more. The effort on D isn’t always there, but it is sometimes, but it was almost never there for him in that span of time. He doesn’t try to do as much, but the end result is he’s a more productive player (in terms of how he helps his team win games).

by Missing Barry on Dec 7, 2009 6:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Speaking of the post-Jackson Trade

His new team he so desperately wanted to get traded to (sorta) just lost to the NETS. Bwhaha.

by GoldenStateGuerrero on Dec 4, 2009 7:41 PM PST reply actions  

PLAYOFFS!

cant wait for charlotte to come to the oracle….

by tafkasam on Dec 5, 2009 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess the test of the pudding...

will come when Charlotte Bobcats play the GSW. Then we can compare how much Jackson
points will be made compared to how much on the average he had with
the GSW.

by sadiri on Dec 6, 2009 5:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

FanPosts


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot