Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

On Mikki Moore, Anthony Randolph, and 'Done' Nelson

To hear people defend Don Nelson for his ridiculous decision of starting Mikki Moore is to hear people mindlessly flail at justifying an authority figure's actions (He MUST have some justification, he's the coach!).  At this point in his career, Moore is simply the worst NBA player I've ever seen in person.  I am not being hyperbolic. I have watched NBA basketball since 1990, and Moore is the worst. He gives you nothing. No rebounding, no shot blocking, no scoring, no defense. Nothing.  John Hollinger puzzled over why the guy is still in the league, and I share in his confusion.

Star-divide

He somehow committed 3 turnovers, 4 fouls, while scoring zero points in 18 minutes.  So no, going with Moore is not about 'winning now,' it's about winning never. It's 4 on 5 and it's inexcusable.  Mikki's PER is getting so low, it's starting to look like a respectable ERA. And there's no reason to be surprised, or assume things will turn around for the 34 year old. 

Mikki evades criticism by simply doing nothing.  He's the only player who can play within his limitations by doing nothing, and it throws casual fans off his scent.  You tend to forget he's there....because he's not really there.  He spent the first half standing next to the paint, occasionally catching a rebound tapped to him in the way a helpless baby bird would receive his mother's regurgitation.  He doesn't 'do his job,' unless his job to send Chirs Kaman to the All Star game.  Mikki was a prime player in opening the third quarter floodgates and he should be getting more flack for his invisible man act.

Now for Randolph.  He had a poor showing, often looking spastic on offense. Unlike Moore's act, his mistakes are perceptible (they are mistakes, not the absence of action). But he did some things that helped, some things that we (Nelson team followers) have been conditioned to devalue.  He rebounded well, and forced five turnovers in an awful mismatch with Chris Kaman.  In short, he got a minus 8 (usually a bad plus minus, but not in this abortion of a game) for a reason. 

We need to start actually valuing the things Randolph (and Biedrins) do, instead of being so scoring obsessed. Rebounds matter. Rebounds win games.  So does blocking/altering shots. When Nelson says, "We're going to get out rebounded in every game," it's important to remember that he's choosing this losing strategy-- the Warriors aren't resigned to it.

So no more of the Moore talk, please.  There is no logic to Nelson's actions other than masochism.  Perhaps Nellie doesn't feel he deserves the win record, and is undermining his own success. Maybe he's just drunk.  Maybe it's both. I don't know what's happening inside his head, but I do know that we don't deserve this guy.  Stop justifying the actions of someone who either wants to lose, or is doing a damned good imitation of a self saboteur.

Poll
Do you ever want to see Moore start over Randolph again?

  308 votes | Results

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

1 recs  |  Comment 51 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

One bad game...

Is no reason to hang the guy…

Yes AR should have started…but Moore has actually played a couple of games reasonably… personally I am more p!@#ed off right now at yet ANOTHER Andris injury…. what the hell is this guy doing to condition himself?

Warriors are getting wayyyy too many injuries, which says to me the sports fitness coaches are doing a crap job right now…

We need these guys doing better strength training ….two major injuries inside of 4 games is not acceptable, lets not even go near the Wright issue….

Yet another part of this Warriors franchise that is simply not delivering right now…

GSOM Blog Beast!

by BritWarriorGSW on Nov 7, 2009 5:55 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

If Moore’s heavy minutes are an indictment of Nellie, they’re an indictment of his GMing, not his coaching.

Benching a promising young player for a worse backup is fine if it helps teach that young player going forward. But having a backup as bad as Mikki Moore does not speak well of a front office’s ability to collect talent.

And no, three of our top four bigs being out doesn’t excuse it. Mikki’s our fifth big. The fifth bigs on other teams include Ryan Anderson, Shelden Williams, Taj Gibson, Darnell Jackson, Tim Thomas, Pops Mensah-Bonsu, Amir Johnson, Earl Clark… you get the idea. None of these guys are All-Stars, and maybe none of them will ever be good enough to start for an NBA team (other than Anderson — God, the Magic are deep). But each of these players does some useful, positive things… you’re not completely screwed if you have to give them 20 minutes one night. Smart teams have viable fifth bigs. They don’t put themselves in the situation we’re currently in.

One of the grimmest things about last night? The juxtaposition of the rosters. Our fifth big looked like he didn’t belong on an NBA court. The Clippers’ fifth big scored 13 points against us in the fourth quarter. So, yeah. While I don’t begrudge the minutes Mikki Moore got last night, I do begrudge the fact that he’s on the team in the first place. Riley/Nellie/Rowell/whoever did a crappy job of filling out our bench.

by onlxn on Nov 7, 2009 6:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Actually

Anderson & Gibson start. Clark is a rookie so you have to give him some time. But I still get your drift….

GSOM- Where Education From Debate Happens

by The Dedication on Nov 8, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Normally, I'd give you the benefit of the doubt on the "fifth big man" comment, but...

At the very least, you’re cherry picking some of the best “end of the bench big men.” What I found by actually looking these guys up, however, is that you’re looking at starters like Anderson & Gibson, and first tier backups for the most part.

Ryan AndersonStarter
Shelden WilliamsListed as first back up center, but he goes back to “5th big man” once Davis is back. He’s still not the last guy on their bench.
Taj GibsonListed as first backup PF, but has started 3 games.
Darnell JacksonLegitimately their “5th big man,” yet he’s a rookie who’s played 4 minutes in which went 0-2 and turned the ball over.
Tim ThomasListed as first backup PF, but has been injured
Pops Mensah-BonsuLigitimate “5th big man”
Amir JohnsonBackup PF
Earl ClarkLegitimate “5th big man”

So, we’ve got one starter, one part time starter, 3 primary backups, and 4 legitimate “5th big man” types (two of whom are still on their rookie contracts). I’m not convinced that any of the 4 guys (Williams, Jackson, Mensah-Bonsu, or Johnson) is any better than Moore right now.

Can you name a few more players that were, you know, actually available in August that would have been better than Moore? That’s really the issue. Mensah-Bonsu, maybe.

Do I actually have to look through the depth charts around the league for “5th big man” veterans?

Atlanta – Jason Collins
Charlotte – Nazr Mohammed
Chicago – Jerome James
Denver – Johan Petro (not to mention their #4 guy is Malik Allen)
Detroit – Kwame Brown

And that’s just the first 5 teams I looked at that weren’t covered above.

The Clippers’ fifth big scored 13 points against us in the fourth quarter.

I expect better from you Owen. That performance was “unstoppable.” Why not bring up Anthony Randolph’s 9/6 in that quarter as reason for why he’s so awesome (ignoring the putrid 1-9 shooting performance he put on in the first 3 quarters of the game)

Riley/Nellie/Rowell/whoever did a crappy job of filling out our bench.

Shelden Williams I’ll give you. We probably should have gone after him. But he’s never shot well, rebounds only half-acceptably, and is exactly the type of player that doesn’t really look like a fit for Nellie’s system. And if you’re Shelden Williams and you’re faced with “Sign with Boston to sit at the end of the bench for the vet minimum” and “Sign with Golden State to sit at the end of the bench for the vet minimum,” you know exactly where he’s going. Why? Because Boston might win a championship this year… 3 years removed from Celtic fans saying “OMGWTF Danny Ainge is the worst GM in the world!” My point? You get a better team, then you attract better end of the bench talent. And GMs that look terrible one day may look rosy the next. It’s only the FO’s fault for not having a better team in the first place. The Warriors are at a competitive disadvantage WRT free agents because we have a sub-par team, which only makes us even worse in comparison. What can the FO do to fix this? Draft a superstar… which is mostly luck to begin with.

Show me someone who didn’t have better options that’s unequivocally better than Mikki Moore that was available for the veteran minimum in August.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 9, 2009 11:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ryan Anderson – Starter

Not when Rashard’s back. They came into the year with Dwight and Rashard as their starting 4 and 5, Gortat and Bass as the backups and Anderson as the fifth big. If you want to call Gortat or Bass their fifth big, fine… they’re both damn good too.

Shelden Williams – Listed as first back up center, but he goes back to "5th big man" once Davis is back. He’s still not the last guy on their bench.

So exactly the same as Moore, then: fifth big, 12th or so on the roster. Mikki’s not the last guy on our bench. He’s ahead of Speedy, Law and George in the pecking order.

Taj Gibson – Listed as first backup PF, but has started 3 games.

Moore’s started also, but, fair enough. The Bulls’ fifth big is the injured Aaron Gray, who’s a country mile better than Mikki. The Bulls’ sixth big is James Johnson, who may never amount to much, but I’d certainly take him over Mikki.

Darnell Jackson – Legitimately their "5th big man," yet he’s a rookie who’s played 4 minutes in which went 0-2 and turned the ball over.

Not a rookie. He didn’t play much last year, as the team was deep and he was hurt… he didn’t play well last year, either. He played as well as Mikki, though, and he’s ten years younger and (slightly) cheaper. Who would you rather have, the crappy guy who’ll probably get better or the crappy guy who’ll probably get worse?

Tim Thomas – Listed as first backup PF, but has been injured

This one I may have fudged, in the sense that I counted Marion as a PF. They have been playing Marion at the four a good bit so far… once Gortat bailed on them, it was clear they’d play Dirk at the five and Marion at the four a good amount of the time. Nevertheless, we won’t count that. Their fifth big is then Kris Humphries, who’s a rock-solid bench player, and… you guessed it… runs circles around Mikki Moore.

Pops Mensah-Bonsu – Ligitimate "5th big man"

yep

Amir Johnson – Backup PF

My bad… I thought Reggie Evans was injured, when in fact I guess they’re just not playing him. So Evans is their fifth big, not Amir. Evans is a horribly, horribly flawed player, and in many ways even worse than Mikki. But he grabs a rebound 50-60% more often than Mikki. I know who I’d rather have.

(The other candidate for the Raptors’ fifth big is the infamous POB. Let the laughter commence… trouble is, by all available metrics, even Patrick O’Bryant is better than Mikki.)

Earl Clark – Legitimate "5th big man"

yep

So, the amended list: Brandon Bass, Shelden Williams, Aaron Gray, Darnell Jackson, Kris Humphries, Pops Mensah-Bonsu, Reggie Evans and Earl Clark.

I’m not convinced that any of the 4 guys (Williams, Jackson, Mensah-Bonsu, or Johnson) is any better than Moore right now.

I can’t prove you wrong on Jackson. I’d absolutely take the young guy, but it’s possible he’s not yet better than Mikki. As for the other three… well, I guess stats don’t prove you wrong, but according to any type of statistic you can find, they are better than Mikki. Not a little better, not moderately better… laughably better. A completely different tier of player from him.

Can you name a few more players that were, you know, actually available in August that would have been better than Moore? That’s really the issue.

No, this is the issue: why did the Warriors wait two months to sign a fifth big? Free agency started on the first day of July… the Warriors signed Mikki on the second day of September. In between, dozens of bigs changed teams. Many went for more money than we would’ve spent, and many went to better teams. But not all. The Rockets got David Anderson for a second-round pick and cash. The Hawks signed Joe Smith to a minimum deal, and it’s not like he thinks he’s going to get a ring there. The Hornets signed Ike Diogu to a minimum deal… laugh all you want, but he’s ten times the player Mikki is, and again, he didn’t go there to win a championship. That’s to say nothing of simply buying a second-round pick from a cash-strapped team and drafting a guy, the way the Spurs did with Blair.

You’re contending that the Warriors had to sign a crappy fifth big because logistics trapped them in a corner. That’s simply not true. They wandered willingly into that corner, by not bothering to take care of that position until all the credible talent was gone.

Do I actually have to look through the depth charts around the league for "5th big man" veterans?

Let’s do it.

Atlanta – Jason Collins

A horrible, horrible player. The rare player that’s definitively worse than Mikki Moore. But he’s not their fifth big, he’s their sixth. Their fifth big is Randolph Morris. Morris is also horrible, and quite possibly as horrible as Mikki. But at least they have two warm bodies to smack people instead of one.

Moreover, I’m not claiming that no other team has a fifth big as bad as Mikki. I’m claiming that the teams that do have fifth bigs as bad as Mikki are, like us, stupid.

Charlotte – Nazr Mohammed

A fading, overpaid player. Has historically been a vastly better player than Mikki, only dipping close to Mikki’s level last year, and he’s running circles around Mikki again so far this year.

Chicago – Jerome James

Their fifth big is Aaron Gray, and their sixth is James Johnson… Jerome James is their seventh big. He does suck, though.

Denver – Johan Petro (not to mention their #4 guy is Malik Allen)

K-Mart, Nene, Birdman, Balkman… Malik Allen’s their fifth. He and Petro do stink, and I think the Nugget’s financial inability to bolster their frontcourt depth will hurt them again in the playoffs. They have by far the worst deep bench of any team that seems to know what they’re doing.

Detroit – Kwame Brown

Punchline though he may be, Kwame Brown is much, much, much better than Mikki Moore.

And that’s just the first 5 teams I looked at that weren’t covered above.

Well, I’m happy to keep going if you like. So far we’ve covered thirteen teams… only three even plausibly have a fifth big as bad as Mikki, and two of those teams, the Cavs and Nuggets, play their star SFs at PF often enough that their need for a fifth big is lessened. (Smallball works a lot better with Lebron and ‘Melo than with Jack.) Moreover, both of those teams have been actively looking to upgrade their depth via trade. Only the Hawks seem as complacent about their horrible third-of-the-bench bigs as we are. And they haven’t actually had to use theirs yet, unlike us.

I expect better from you Owen. That performance was "unstoppable." Why not bring up Anthony Randolph’s 9/6 in that quarter as reason for why he’s so awesome (ignoring the putrid 1-9 shooting performance he put on in the first 3 quarters of the game)

Ha, it’s a fair point… my snark was perhaps unnecessary. But I do think that DeAndre Jordan is a genuinely promising young player, and already a vastly better player than Mikki Moore. Do you disagree?

Shelden Williams I’ll give you. We probably should have gone after him. But he’s never shot well, rebounds only half-acceptably, and is exactly the type of player that doesn’t really look like a fit for Nellie’s system.

Even at that, he’s always been much better than Mikki. And I don’t see Mikki as much of a fit for Nellie’s system either.

And if you’re Shelden Williams and you’re faced with "Sign with Boston to sit at the end of the bench for the vet minimum" and "Sign with Golden State to sit at the end of the bench for the vet minimum," you know exactly where he’s going. Why? Because Boston might win a championship this year… 3 years removed from Celtic fans saying "OMGWTF Danny Ainge is the worst GM in the world!" My point? You get a better team, then you attract better end of the bench talent. And GMs that look terrible one day may look rosy the next. It’s only the FO’s fault for not having a better team in the first place.

Now this is all certainly true. Talent begets talent. I agree.

But it wasn’t marquee value that put DeAndre Jordan on the Clippers, or Aaron Gray on the Bulls, or David Andersen on the Rockets, or DeJuan Blair on the Spurs. It was smart GMing. Those teams realized it was useful to stockpile bigs who could do a thing or two, and went out and got them, and have an edge over us as a result. Not every bench big is Antonio McDyess, a stud taking a pay cut to try to win a ring. A lot of these guys are very easily acquired by any team that takes the trouble to get them. Most teams do. We didn’t.

Show me someone who didn’t have better options that’s unequivocally better than Mikki Moore that was available for the veteran minimum in August.

I’d guess there are a number of players that are unequivocally better that you and I have never heard of… I don’t think NBA teams are so efficient at evaluating talent that there aren’t some viable bigs in the D-League or overseas that haven’t gotten a shot here.

But let’s even pretend those guys don’t exist. Let’s say that Mikki Moore was the best guy left available for the minimum on September 2nd. What does that tell you? It tells you you shouldn’t wait till September 2nd to sign a guy to fill out your frontcourt. The Warriors should’ve tried to buy a pick on draft night, or been more aggressive about trying to sign a better fringy guy, or been more energetic about trading for a fringy guy. Instead, they were lazy and uncreative, and as a result have had to put a horrible player on the floor for a quarter of their minutes so far.

In this young season, of the 250 or so guys that have played more than garbage minutes, Mikki Moore ranks as the worst player by far. He is by no means the reason we’re terrible. But his presence, and the thought process that led to it, are emblematic of why this franchise is in such miserable shape.

by onlxn on Nov 9, 2009 2:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Grrr...

I hate typing up a comment, pressing the back button, and losing everything. That’s the single wish I have for the SBN update: Save my drafts.

But it wasn’t marquee value that put DeAndre Jordan on the Clippers, or Aaron Gray on the Bulls, or David Andersen on the Rockets, or DeJuan Blair on the Spurs. It was smart GMing.

It was “drafting,” not “smart GMing.” DeAndre Jordan could have turned into Ike Diogu, Aaron Gray PoB, and David Andersen into Stephen Lasme (OK, Andersen was acquired by trade). Why bring these guys up? Because the Warriors FO has been trying to draft bigs: Anthony Randolph, Richard Hendrix, Brandan Wright, Stephen Lasme, PoB, Kosta, Ike Diogu, Chris Taft, Andris Biedrins. Those are 9 of the Warriors’ last 12 draft picks. The other three have been Monta Ellis, Stephen Curry, and Marco Belinelli. You may call it “good drafting,” I call it “lucky drafting.” You could argue that the Warriors reached for PoB or Ike Diogu, but there really wasn’t anybody better to go after in those two drafts.

It’s not rocket science.

What “statistical measures” are you referencing? I sincerely hope you’re not using Mikki’s 8 shots this season as a significant portion of your “statistical measures.”

The Warriors were trying to do lots of big things (trade Crawford, trade Jax, trade for STAT, trade for Bosh), do you really think they should have been devoting time to the end of the bench when they didn’t know what kind of players they’d have above that guy?

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 9, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It was "drafting," not "smart GMing." DeAndre Jordan could have turned into Ike Diogu, Aaron Gray PoB, and David Andersen into Stephen Lasme (OK, Andersen was acquired by trade). Why bring these guys up? Because the Warriors FO has been trying to draft bigs: Anthony Randolph, Richard Hendrix, Brandan Wright, Stephen Lasme, PoB, Kosta, Ike Diogu, Chris Taft, Andris Biedrins. Those are 9 of the Warriors’ last 12 draft picks.

A couple things:

1) Drafting is not simply a lottery. San Antonio was not dumbly lucky when they bought the pick that got them DeJuan Blair… they saw an opportunity to grab an undervalued player, and they took it. Compare that to our picking POB, an obvious mistake before the fact. (I’m not blaming POB on this regime… if people want to chalk that up as a Mullin mistake, that’s fine.) There is a lot of guesswork in drafting, but it is not 100% guesswork. The Jordan and Blair picks were obviously savvy moves the moment they were announced.

2) I’d put down good money that Richard Hendrix would be more useful to us than Mikki Moore. We waived our rights to Richard Hendrix to keep, among others, Marcus Williams, a guy we had no intention whatsoever of ever playing. Moreover, a guy like Ike Diogu would be an absolute asset to us right now. This team has a habit of dumping any big man that proves to be something less than a star. In many cases, that’s been the right call. But it leaves you thin.

3) For the purposes of this season, what does it matter what our drafting history is? Did we expect that other teams would say, “Look, they’re playing Mikki Moore… well, they tried to draft a lot of bigs in the past five years, so we should go easy on ’em”? We were a big short this summer. Even if you believe that drafting is pure luck, we still should’ve bought a second-rounder to add a warm body. It couldn’t have been a surprise to the front office that this wasn’t an attractive destination… the easiest way to get around that is to draft a guy, so he has no choice to go elsewhere.

If you want to think of the draft as a lottery, fine… it’s still a lottery worth playing for a thin team.

What "statistical measures" are you referencing? I sincerely hope you’re not using Mikki’s 8 shots this season as a significant portion of your "statistical measures."

I mainly brought up Moore’s last-place showing thus far because I thought it was amusing. I’m mainly referring to the Winning Percentages as used by Basketball Prospectus, with an eye towards the Win Shares at basketball-reference.com and the adjusted plus-minus numbers at 82games.com.

Last year, Shelden Williams had a .496 Win%. A team with Williams and four average players would go about 41-41.
Last year, Pops Mensah-Bonsu had a .528 Win%. A team with Mensah-Bonsu and four average players would go about 43-39.
Last year, Amir Johnson had a .505 Win%. A team with Johnson and four average players would go about 41-41.

Last year, Mikki Moore had a .364 Win%. A team with Mikki and four average players would go about 30-52.

That’s not a stream… that’s a river. He rates much worse than all of those guys. By Win Shares, same thing… he’s close to Mensah-Bonsu, actually, but blown away by the other two. In adjusted plus-minus, he’s at least four points worse per 48 minutes than each of them… almost eight points worse than Williams. Remember, this is last year. These metrics have Johnson and Williams as better than Moore in ‘07-’08, as well.

The Warriors were trying to do lots of big things (trade Crawford, trade Jax, trade for STAT, trade for Bosh), do you really think they should have been devoting time to the end of the bench when they didn’t know what kind of players they’d have above that guy?

Yes! Smart teams find the time to think about all 15 roster spots during the course of an entire summer.

It’s not rocket science.

My friend, I’m afraid that’s exactly what it is.

The Rockets reached the second round and took the Lakers to seven games this spring; after Yao went out, their rotation of bigs consisted of

1) Chuck Hayes, who they signed out of the D-League;
2) Luis Scola, whose rights they acquired in a tiny trade designed to save the Spurs some money;
3) Carl Landry, a Sonics second-round pick the Rockets acquired for a future second-round pick.

This year, they’re still missing Yao and T-Mac, but they’re 4-2 and looking legit, thanks in large part to the three players above, and to David Andersen and Chase Budinger, two second-rounders they traded for who become immediate rotation guys.

Stupid teams neglect the end of their bench while they’re trying to trade for a superstar, or clear up a headache elsewhere on the roster. Stupid teams grouse about how they’ll never be good until they get lucky in the draft lottery. Smart teams don’t waste their team doing that. The Rockets are playoff-bound, with an active roster that only features one guy who was taken earlier than the 24th pick overall.

Why? Rocket science. The Rockets believe in science, we believe in luck. And until we stop believing in luck… until we stop hoping that a ball will bounce our way, or that Mikki Moore will maybe do just as well as any other tall guy… we will always, always fail.

by onlxn on Nov 9, 2009 5:07 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Dude you give the longest responses ever

by Missing Barry on Nov 9, 2009 6:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought about addressing the points you made, but thought better of it. You make a pretty solid argument for why Mikki Moore is not a good player and for why the Warriors should have been after somebody else a little earlier. I still contend that the Warriors coaching staff and front office know what they got with Hendrix and that he is still available. The fact that they’ve not gone and grabbed someone else (and that they added Moore knowing Hendrix was out there) tells me that they believe that neither Hendrix, nor another NBDL option will be better than Moore. You may disagree, and that’s fine. I submit that you’re watching from your couch while they’ve got scouts at their disposal who can be at NBDL games. Despite your protestations, they’re not idiotic and incompetent. They may have been a little slow on the pickup in adding Moore, but Richard Hendrix would have gladly take the pay raise any NBA team would give him. Why isn’t anybody calling, let alone just the Warriors?

I’d also argue that the Warriors have been at least as successful mining the second round and NBDL (Monta, Kelenna, CJ, Morrow, heck, you can include Arenas in there), but for guards instead of bigs. I’d rather it be the other way around too, but I’m certainly happy with the “diamonds in the rough” we do have.

Let’s also look at the Rockets from a slightly different angle:

While they were out adding depth to their bigs, they completely neglected their PG position.

Hypothetically, if T-Mac went down (check, and that was well before the draft), Ariza had a minor injury but was on the fritz and unable to contribute due to constant foul trouble and generally playing like an overactive puppy, while Aaron Brooks had a knee injury, and Kyle Lowry dislocated his shoulder…

Why your beloved Rockets would be starting Jermaine Taylor at PG and would have to give Chase Buddinger some serious minutes at SG. You think their fans would be complaining about how they didn’t beef up their PG position?

Taylor may be a decent player, but he’s not a PG by any measure (at least according to his draft bio). Surely they could have used a roster spot to pick up someone like Jason Williams instead! Or even some “savvy” move like buying a 2nd round pick and choosing an underrated prospect! But instead they made the boneheaded move of ignoring the PG position. How dumb.

This is what happens in professional basketball, at one position, you’re thin. If you’re unlucky, you sustain some injuries at positions where you’re thin.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 9, 2009 8:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The fact that they’ve not gone and grabbed someone else (and that they added Moore knowing Hendrix was out there) tells me that they believe that neither Hendrix, nor another NBDL option will be better than Moore. You may disagree, and that’s fine. I submit that you’re watching from your couch while they’ve got scouts at their disposal who can be at NBDL games. Despite your protestations, they’re not idiotic and incompetent.

No, they’re not. But like many NBA observers, they may be a year or two slow to realize that a big man is done. Remember, Mikki is a guy that the defending world champs rushed to get when he came available, costing themselves a shot at the vastly superior Joe Smith in the process. The Celtics quickly realized Mikki had almost nothing to offer anymore.

I don’t think the Warriors front office did a particularly close analysis of Mikki’s game. I think they saw that he was the biggest name left available, and that he could sorta hit a jumper, and they shrugged and signed him. That doesn’t reflect badly on the scouts… for all we know, the scouts told them to avoid Mikki. But it does reflect badly on the front office.

They may have been a little slow on the pickup in adding Moore, but Richard Hendrix would have gladly take the pay raise any NBA team would give him. Why isn’t anybody calling, let alone just the Warriors?

Because he stinks? It’s quite possible. However,

1) he can stink and still be better than Mikki Moore;
2) lest we forget, most teams already have better fifth bigs than Mikki. Several have sixth bigs better than him. Most teams aren’t as desperate for a big as we are. The fact that he couldn’t help a lot of teams doesn’t mean he couldn’t help us.

I’d also argue that the Warriors have been at least as successful mining the second round and NBDL (Monta, Kelenna, CJ, Morrow, heck, you can include Arenas in there), but for guards instead of bigs. I’d rather it be the other way around too, but I’m certainly happy with the "diamonds in the rough" we do have.

No, I’d certainly agree… whenever Nellie’s tenure here comes to a close, his discovery of Azubuike of Morrow will rank as one of the finest accomplishments of his run. But, as you say, all the discoveries have been of a certain type. It’s nice that we have eight guys who can play the three, but you do need other types of players at some point.

Let’s also look at the Rockets from a slightly different angle:

Yes… you could come up with a combination of injuries that would expose the Rockets at the point. (The analogy falls apart at a certain point, because I just don’t buy Ariza coming down with a case of the Randolphs, but we can say his injury forces him to the bench too.) However,

1) It makes a lot more sense to be thin in the backcourt than thin up front. No matter how healthy or injured you are, you know there are going to be a lot of nights when your big guys get in foul trouble early and you’re going to have to go to the bench. If you walk back through all the fifth bigs we discussed earlier, you’ll notice that almost all of them play more often than each team’s third-string point guard.

Frontcourt depth is more important than backcourt depth. The Celtics’ third-string PG is Lester Hudson, a guy who’s played 28 NBA minutes… the Magic’s third-string PG is Anthony Johnson, who pretty much stinks… the Spurs don’t even have a third-string PG. These teams, and the Rockets, aren’t stupid. They know that you’ve got to be built to bang to succeed in the NBA. Backcourt depth isn’t nearly as critical.

2) If the Rockets did find themselves in a position where they had to give heavy minutes to Jermaine Taylor, I’m guessing they’d address that situation pretty damn quick. I don’t think the Rockets would just shrug and keep trotting him out there, the way we’ve been doing with Mikki ever since Wright went down.

This is what happens in professional basketball, at one position, you’re thin. If you’re unlucky, you sustain some injuries at positions where you’re thin.

It does happen. And the Warriors have run into some bad luck. But luck, residue, design, all that. If we’re going to bother to have a fifth big guy, we might as well find someone who can play a little.

by onlxn on Nov 9, 2009 11:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wow..someone likes the quote function...

;) seriously dude…nearly every post has multiple quotes making the page 5 times longer than it needs to be!?!

GSOM Blog Beast!

by BritWarriorGSW on Nov 10, 2009 2:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But, as you say, all the discoveries have been of a certain type. It’s nice that we have eight guys who can play the three, but you do need other types of players at some point.

It’s also nice when you’ve got 8 guys who can play the 5 (I’d realistically extend that to the 4, but Kelenna & Morrow can also play the 2, so it cuts both ways).

1) It makes a lot more sense to be thin in the backcourt than thin up front.

It makes a lot of sense to you and most of the rest of the NBA. Oddly enough, Nellie has ALWAYS gone against conventional thinking. He’s had his successes: “Hey, let’s guard Yao with Al Harrington!” “Hey, I like this Baron/JRich/Jax/Barnes/Biedrins line up, I think they can take down the vaunted Mavericks!”, and his failures: “Hey, Maggette can play the 4.” But, he has never followed conventional wisdom.

They know that you’ve got to be built to bang to succeed in the NBA.

Here’s the root of your problem:

You do not agree with or support Nellie’s philosophy that emphasizes the “matchups and athleticism” and de-emphasizes “bangers.” Before the season, Brandan Wright (our 4th string big) was slotted to get maybe 10 minutes a game… unless he magically learned how to rebound AND make an 18 footer consistently or people above him got injured. Meanwhile, Morrow (arguably our 4th string guard behind Monta, Curry, and Jax) was slotted to get 20-25 minutes, maybe more. Why? Because Morrow is more useful to Nellie.

It’s a difference in philosophy, not a failure to execute or build a team.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 10, 2009 9:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s a difference in philosophy, not a failure to execute or build a team.

A fair point.

At the same time, the proof is in the pudding, is it not? If Nellie insisted on only playing guys who were 5’6" and shorter, and we went 2-80 one year, that would constitute a failure to execute, not just a difference in philosophy.

It’s worth noting that most of the good teams Nellie has coached have had more size than this. The ‘07-’08 team had Biedrins, Al (for all the crap he took, a credible PF), Wright, Croshere, and Barnes (a more viable smallball PF than anyone we currently have) all year… it also featured stretches from Mbenga, Webber, POB and Kosta. Some of those last guys stank, but attention was being paid. The team was never put in a position where it had to start Barnes at the four, let alone a non-rebounder like Jack.

In Dallas, Nellie always had some big depth. In ‘04-’05, he had Dirk, Dampier, Bradley, Alan Henderson, bench bangers in Calvin Booth and Mbenga, and Keith Van Horn, who’s bigger than Randolph or Wright. In ‘03-’04, he had Dirk, Antawn, Bradley, Fortson, viable smallball fours in Antoine Walker and Najera, and a bench banger in Scott Williams. ‘02-’03? Dirk, Bradley, LaFrentz, Popeye, Najera, and a warm body in Evan Eschmeyer to smack people around every now and again. In ‘01-’02, Dirk, Bradley, Juwan, LaFrentz, Wang Zhi Zhi, Danny Manning… you get the idea. Some of the guys listed were as bad as Mikki is now, but not many, and they never saw the minutes Mikki’s currently seeing. Back then, Nellie was pretty energetic about grabbing a new big body when he needed one.

Nellie’s last go-round here? ‘93-’94 was probably his smallest good team ever. Its bigs consisted of Webber, Victor Alexander, Gatling, Billy Owens, the burly phenomenon that was Byron Houston, and a warm body in Josh Grant. Pretty small team, and big credit to Nellie and Webber for pulling it off. At the same time, that team was about as big as the world champion Rockets. It was a substantially smaller and lighter league then. And prior to that season, we had Tyrone Hills and Alton Listers and Tom Tolberts and so on. For all his famous struggles to find a center, Nellie’s teams were rarely actually short on bodies up front, and when they were, they tended to be his weaker teams. Nellie’s Bucks teams had plenty of size for the era.

It’s all well and good to say, “Different strokes for different folks… whatever works.” But it does have to work. Right now we’re being outrebounded by 9.4 a game, and while the injuries to Biedrins and Ronny are the biggest reason why, we could do something about this. We could try to upgrade from Mikki Moore. Instead, we’re sticking to a strategy that’s not working. Last night was great, but it was the result of hot shooting and complete defensive ineptitude by the Wolves, not our smallness. And even in a blowout win, Moore was the glaring weak link.

Nellie’s unconventional wisdom had led to a ton of wins and a ton of good times over the years. But right now, his unconventional wisdom feels like a runaway train, unconstrained by logic or self-examination. There is no real reason to think that it’s helpful to be this small, or to think that Mikki Moore’s the best an injured team ought to be able to do. It feels like the team is just phoning this issue in, and it’s annoying.

by onlxn on Nov 10, 2009 11:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right now we’re being outrebounded by 9.4 a game

And the “We Believe” guys were outrebounded by 5 a game and the arguably better post-We Believe team was outrebounded by 4 per game. It’s one indicator, but not the only one. And certainly not one Nellie focuses on.

Your complaint is that it isn’t working, which is fair. Your focus on the 15th guy on our bench as evidence for why it isn’t working is, to me, ridiculous. It’s not working because the players we have here do not yet know how to work together, do not yet know how to play in the NBA, and none among them is a singular talent on the level of a Chris Webber or a Dirk Nowitski, or a dedicated Baron Davis. That’s the problem. It’s not Mikki Moore.

We could try to upgrade from Mikki Moore.

It’s been, what, 3 games? And Biedrins played in one of them? Please, stop overreacting here. If they’re still trotting out Mikki Moore for 20 minutes a game in December, you’ve got a right to complain that they’ve done nothing to address the situation. Both Andris and Turiaf are still listed as day-to-day. Let’s not jump at trading CJ and Mikki for Pops, just so he can ride pine when, inevitably, Biedrins and Turiaf are back and playing a combined 50 minutes a game and Randolph matures and is able to play 30 minutes (with Maggette or Jax taking the rest of the minutes at the 4).

Instead, we’re sticking to a strategy that’s not working.

Again, reactionary. In many instances, things have to get worse before they get better. In this case, the young guys have to learn to play with each other and take command of the team. There will be hurdles. If you were expecting that to be all roses and puppy dogs, you’re sadly mistaken. And if things don’t get better, no roster upgrade from Mikki Moore to the relatively awesome Pops Mensah Bonsu is going to actually help the team win basketball games. If either of these two is on the floor, that’s a bad sign.

There is no real reason to think that it’s helpful to be this small, or to think that Mikki Moore’s the best an injured team ought to be able to do.

There is no reason to think that:

1. After sustaining somewhat minor injuries to your two top bigs, as well as finding out your best up and coming big isn’t ready within two weeks of each other, that any team would be able to fix things right away. It’s been two weeks, and Biedrins and Turiaf are not expected to miss significant time.

2. A player who’s slightly better than Mikki Moore will step in and “keep the ship aright.”

Finally, when Nellie showed up here, the cupboard was absolutely bereft of bigs. He had Troy Murphy, PoB, Adonal Foyle, and Andris (just ready to break out Andris). That’s it. Murphy and Foyle were better than Moore, but PoB and Andris. Andris was in the “Anthony Randolph zone” of “OMG, this guy is good, but Nellie’s not gonna play him.” It’s not like he showed up and jettisoned qualified guys.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 10, 2009 12:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And the "We Believe" guys were outrebounded by 5 a game and the arguably better post-We Believe team was outrebounded by 4 per game. It’s one indicator, but not the only one. And certainly not one Nellie focuses on.

Indeed not. But can you point to a viable NBA team that has ever been outrebounded by nine per game?

Your focus on the 15th guy on our bench as evidence for why it isn’t working is, to me, ridiculous.

You keep saying Mikki is the 15th guy on our bench. There is literally no basis for that. At no point has Mikki ever been behind Speedy or George in the pecking order. I don’t see any reason to think he was ever behind Acie Law in the pecking order. He’s our 12th guy.

You can act like your 12th guy doesn’t matter either, but good teams think about things like this. And if your response is, “In Nellie’s mind Mikki is the 15th guy, because Nellie doesn’t care about bigs”, the answer to that is, “Then Nellie’s making a serious mistake.”

It’s not working because the players we have here do not yet know how to work together, do not yet know how to play in the NBA, and none among them is a singular talent on the level of a Chris Webber or a Dirk Nowitski, or a dedicated Baron Davis. That’s the problem. It’s not Mikki Moore.

I have repeatedly said Mikki Moore is not the problem. Mikki Moore is emblematic of the problem, which is the thoughtlessness of management. That same thoughtlessness is why you say our players “do not yet know how to work together” even though younger and less experienced teams do, and why you say our players “do not yet know how to play in the NBA” despite the presence of an accomplished eleven-year veteran, an accomplished ten-year veteran, an accomplished six-year veteran, two accomplished five-year veterans, and so on. We’re the tenth-youngest team in the league, not the youngest; we only have one rookie. These excuses just don’t quite add up.

Your point is, “hey, it’s hard to succeed in the NBA.” That’s true! A franchise needs to try very hard to accomplish it. My point is, this franchise isn’t trying very hard. And that sucks.

It’s been, what, 3 games? And Biedrins played in one of them? Please, stop overreacting here. If they’re still trotting out Mikki Moore for 20 minutes a game in December, you’ve got a right to complain that they’ve done nothing to address the situation. Both Andris and Turiaf are still listed as day-to-day. Let’s not jump at trading CJ and Mikki for Pops, just so he can ride pine when, inevitably, Biedrins and Turiaf are back and playing a combined 50 minutes a game and Randolph matures and is able to play 30 minutes (with Maggette or Jax taking the rest of the minutes at the 4).

We don’t have to trade anyone (and in fact, we can’t trade CJ or Mikki for another 5-6 weeks, due to league rules). We can just release Devean George and add somebody. Maybe we think his $1.6 million expiring deal is too valuable a trade chip to lose? I have trouble believing that, given that we have four other expirings, two of which are bigger, and you can’t actually give another team a bundle of seven contracts due to roster constraints. But, fine, we can shop George around. Hamed Haddadi is the Grizzlies’ eighth big, and a worse version of Thabeet… you don’t think they’d be happy to get out from under the money they owe him in ‘10-’11? And would it kill us to burn $1.6 million next year on a player with serious rebounding and shot-blocking potential, when we’re already capped out anyway?

We don’t have to sacrifice someone like CJ to fix this hole. We don’t have to get a good player. But Devean George’s roster spot is inert. We can put a big guy there without much trouble. Why wouldn’t we, exactly?

There is no reason to think that:

1. After sustaining somewhat minor injuries to your two top bigs, as well as finding out your best up and coming big isn’t ready within two weeks of each other, that any team would be able to fix things right away. It’s been two weeks, and Biedrins and Turiaf are not expected to miss significant time.

But Wright is. Even when Biedrins and Turiaf are healthy again, we’re stuck at four total bigs, something that no other team can say, something that is clearly a problem. And with all due respect, the idea that no team could possibly fill a hole right now is laughable. Minnesota had a hole when Love got hurt. Guess what? They got Nathan Jawai and cash from the Mavericks for a conditional second-rounder three weeks ago. You can find help if you care enough to look.

2. A player who’s slightly better than Mikki Moore will step in and "keep the ship aright."

Total straw man… nobody’s saying that. But a player who’s slightly better than Mikki Moore would make this team slightly better. Shouldn’t that be a goal? Do you really think there’s no point in crafting and improving our team until we stumble into a superstar? Has this team really lowered your expectations to that degree, so that you don’t think it’s a problem when laziness creates an easily avoided weakness on our roster?

Come on, man. Look around the league. Teams, even bad teams, try harder than this. Brandan Wright went down more than three weeks before the season started, leaving us with a terrible player as our fourth big man. We have done nothing, nada, zero about it. That’s not about Nellieball or bad luck. That’s simple apathy, and it’s indefensible.

Finally, when Nellie showed up here, the cupboard was absolutely bereft of bigs. He had Troy Murphy, PoB, Adonal Foyle, and Andris (just ready to break out Andris). That’s it. Murphy and Foyle were better than Moore, but PoB and Andris. Andris was in the "Anthony Randolph zone" of "OMG, this guy is good, but Nellie’s not gonna play him." It’s not like he showed up and jettisoned qualified guys.

Ike Diogu was here, too… Ike was and is better than 34-year-old Mikki. But it was more than worth punting on Ike to get rid of Dunmurphy, and Ike still can’t seem to stay healthy wherever he goes. Zarko and Taft had also been here in ‘05-’06, but injuries washed them both out the next year.

Anyway, I agree with your general point: Nellie hasn’t punted on good bigs. That doesn’t mean he has carte blanche to ignore the position. We badly need help up front right now, and have needed it ever since Brandan Wright went down. Whosever job it is to get us that help is failing miserably.

by onlxn on Nov 10, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

also

Per Kawakami (whose opinions I think are pretty dumb, but who tends to report basic facts properly), Biedrins’s back won’t even be re-evaluated for another two weeks, meaning we’ll be without him for at least the next eight games. The lack of depth up front is not a problem that’s about to go away. We need to do something about this.

by onlxn on Nov 10, 2009 2:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the OP.

How Mikki Moore is still in the Association is beyond me. He can’t really do anything. And not starting AR because he is young is the worst excuse ever, especially when the W’s starting one is a Rook. He should be retired or something along those lines, not starting for an NBA basketball team.

by jballa838 on Nov 7, 2009 6:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

HAHA i got a good laugh out of this...
You tend to forget he’s there….because he’s not really there. He spent the first half standing next to the paint, occasionally catching a rebound tapped to him in the way a helpless baby bird would receive his mother’s regurgitation. He doesn’t ‘do his job,’ unless his job to send Chirs Kaman to the All Star game

I’ve seen him avoid slashing players and let them score right next to him. And they’re guards! It’s hard to get mad at him and point a specific error out because he honestly doesn’t do much.

by misterho on Nov 8, 2009 12:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Who voted for Moore?

Nellie? Is that you?

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 8, 2009 12:36 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Ahhhh

You sir it seems…have a true understanding of how basketball must be played. Good post. While I said that I think AR should start, I absolutely agree with you 100% that while Moore is not the best player by a long shot, he does understand the basic principles of the game 200% more than Randolph right now and I am hoping that the primary reason for Moore being here, is to help Randolph learn the game better than he currently seems able to read it.

The fanboyism that every player must be an all star is simply not realistic. Moore is one of those players that might add something useful every now and then, but most importantantly will help teach positional play and basic principle of how to fit into the offense.

To say that Moore is the worst player in the league really is riddiculous.

Do I want him to see large amounts of PT, no….
Do we have much choice right now… No…
Do I hope that Randolph might learn a few things from Moore… Yes…
and as Sam says below… there may be a bigger picture here…

GSOM Blog Beast!

by BritWarriorGSW on Nov 8, 2009 3:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm really happy to see a post like this with so many recommendations

It means I’m not the only one screaming into the tornado.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 9, 2009 9:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

showcasing Moore to be used in a December trade that nets us a big?

Thing A

by sam23 on Nov 8, 2009 2:12 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

asdf

Eh, who cares at this point, I actually turned the game off in the 1st quarter because it’s hard to find something on this team to be excited about other then Randolph and Nellie doesn’t even play him for some insane reason only he knows of. It’s weird if you think about it too because this team has good young players but we already know the outcome of what will happen to them. They’ll stay with the Dubs and play out a mediocre career or they’ll be traded/leave when they’re a FA and become a star.

by JRich4MVP on Nov 8, 2009 2:16 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

who cares who starts? either way Mikki’s going to have to play (since the Warriors are down to him & Randolph at the C spots).

the real complaint is not picking up an extra big man (one who shouldn’t be retired) after Brandan went down. maybe Cohan/Rowell just didn’t want extra payroll, but it makes little sense not to pick up someone who can actually still play in the NBA knowing Wright is pretty much out for the season.

by homer simpson on Nov 8, 2009 8:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

a glimpse on the SAVIOR aka greatest thing since the karaoke machine

from marcus thompson:

Randolph didn’t do himself any favors this night. Certainly, part of the reason is because he has no idea how long he’s going to play or which mistakes he can make. He’s caught between trying to do enough to prove he belongs out there, all the while trying not to make mistakes.
He’s not doing that good of job at the task.

His offense looks uncoordinated at best. He is committing a lot of fouls on defense and he’s getting ridiculous with the goal-tending. But he is rebounding better of late and he drew five charges Friday.
Was asking around and several are saying this latest rift between Randolph and Nellie isn’t Nellie’s fault. Randolph’s attitude and lack of humility is keeping him from excelling on the court.
Randolph has vowed to keep his mouth shut and he’s trying hard not to say the wrong thing. But even that is on a defiant tip. And Nellie, with his fare share of ego, isn’t going to take any attitude from some second-year player who has talent but still needs a lot of work.
But, from what I was told, Randolph is acting as if he’s arrived, like the summer league and first part of preseason earned him a starting spot, big minutes and some leniency.
(LMAO) The moment he realizes he’s got to grind like he was this summer, and be coachable, he’s going to take off, insiders tell me.

from simmons:

During Friday’s loss, Monta Ellis pointed at, yelled at and then dissed Anthony Randolph for not knowing his assignments. After Ellis barked at Randolph, no teammate went to console the second-year player. THANK YOU!

so i guess play this dude huh?

my code name is "kelenna bahongpuki"

by VonteegoCummings on Nov 8, 2009 9:02 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rebounding by AR Overrated

Yes, he mixes it up on defense and is a tenacious rebounder.

However, that DOES NOT win games, if most times when the ball touches his hands on offense he does something stupid to waste the possession.

Rebounds are great…when they translate to points. You can be the best defensive team in the league, but if you can’t score points, you can’t win.

AR is killing this team on offense more than Maggs or Jack combined.

by joegiant on Nov 8, 2009 9:50 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

AR is killing this team on offense more than Maggs or Jack combined.

Last game, his offensive numbers weren’t terrible, if you take into consideration how many free throws he shot. He also had 14 boards in only 30 min.‘s. I’m not saying he’s ready to play, but I think he helped us more than he hurt us. He’s got to reign it in still. He’s a work in progress, but even as is, he does some very good things.

Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.

by Naticus2 on Nov 8, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Rebounding is great, but AR looks pretty hapless out there. He’s not good. He’s not an NBA caliber PF yet. Is that Nellie’s fault? Is it Nelson’s fault Randolph spins around in the paint, jumps straight in the air and throws the ball at the rim like a spaz?

I don’t know. I don’t get it. Randolph is just young. I don’t want to to hate on him, but it’s just stilly the way people hype him up.

He’s NOT GOOD, he’s JUST athletic and active. It’s a start, I guess, but he needs a lot of time.

Is it Nelson’s fault? Really? With Beidrins, Turiaf, and Wright all down, it’s Nelson’s fault we don’t have another big to play? Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. WE HAD TO PLAY MIKKI MOORE!

Don Nelson may not be the answer, but we’ve had A LOT of coaches over the years, and Nelson’s the only one who’s gotten us to the playoffs, so it’s not like a an immediate ugrade at HC is just out there for the taking.

Anyway, Nelson deserves his share of the blame when the team performs poorly, and that includes his overall approach/philosophy, but we ought to at least be frank about the talent on this team.

by Jeremy Belvins on Nov 8, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It hurts

to have so many “good” players on a team, and then have veterans that have roles, but cannot dominate on a day to day basis against the best. That goes for all positions, not just center. Right now, Ellis is the only potential all star on the team, (for this year at least). Unfortunately, his shooting touch is off right now.

Let’s face it, Moore wouldn’t be seeing more than 2 minutes of garbage time per game if Turiaf and Beans were healthy. As a 3rd option he’s not terrible. The last game just shows how many intangibles the centers bring. Hustle and intensity are not always evident in the boxscore.

To all those who say they aren’t in good conditioning: try banging with the biggest, strongest people in the world and come out with just a strained back. Lucky it wasn’t something worse, like a dislocated shoulder.

Anthony Randoph for Most Improved Player

by danielholl on Nov 8, 2009 10:30 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

To ALL those was me....

If You cant bang and bash against the biggest men in the league, you have no business being a starting Centre in the NBA….It really is that simple…..

GSOM Blog Beast!

by BritWarriorGSW on Nov 8, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nelson The Huckster

I love DONE NELSON, its a perfect name for a carnival huckster, who has hoodwinked Cohan, Rowell and some of these gullible Warrior fans, to think that at this stage in his drooling life that he can still coach..

He is like the scamming carnival huckster who will say or do anything for a buck..If you look at Nelson on the bench during games, he has this far away look in his eyes..The assistants do the coaching in the huddles and Nelson laughs all the way to the bank..

Why the hell didn’t Nelson and Riley get some real help up front, instead of signing the worst player in the NBA Moore..

I am hoping and praying that Nelson the huckster doesn’t get his 24 wins..

by The Sear on Nov 8, 2009 11:14 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

again.... Moore the worst player in the NBA???

Please……there are MANY….many worse players currently in the league…

GSOM Blog Beast!

by BritWarriorGSW on Nov 8, 2009 12:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wash your mouth out

- think for a moment – the ramifications of not getting those 24 wins is MORE of “done” Nelson the next year – talk about vulgar language! (oops, sorry, wrong thread)

seriously tho, unless you are stealing the initiative and making the earliest call for tanking the season for next draft (this is even too early for me) the possibility of another season of Nelson should scare you into hoping he gets his hallowed (or hollow?) record and sails off to the Maui sunset …

and MM was never supposed to be anything more than a couple minute per game guy – few teams succeed without their first and second best bigs are dressed out in suits

by hardcore on Nov 8, 2009 1:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Riley & The Huckster

When Wright got hurt, why didn’t Riley and the Huckster do something about it?? Turiaf was already struggling with his knee..So these two geniuses knew the only somewhat healthy big men were Moore & Biedrins(who is always gimpy)..

I hope the Kings rip them a new butthole tonight..

by The Sear on Nov 8, 2009 11:21 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

+1

I know were in trouble cause of injuries but Don is saying he’s now seeing AR more as a 5 which is utterly ridiculous, just cause they dont shoot 3’s doesnt make them centers!

by 123707THIZZ on Nov 8, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The thing that cracks me up about this

Is this fanpost is exactly how Kings fans felt about Moore getting PT over JT last season.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 8, 2009 2:03 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

While I can admit AR needs to develop….but when does that happen? In garbage time? Summer league again next year? D-league? This team is going nowhere right now-let him learn on the fly and develop.

That said, if he is causing problems with his attitude, he shouldnt play.

by Bellringer21 on Nov 8, 2009 2:38 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Maybe when he's not fouling 5 times in 22 minutes...

You need to avoid fouling out if you want to stay on the basketball floor… just sayin’.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 9, 2009 11:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He is a 4 Nellie!

The reason why he is struggling now is cause you play him at center! Why can’t he just realize that having two bigs on the floor that can’t shoot 3’s is sometimes a good thing?

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 8, 2009 5:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I must agree...

Moore is garbage. I really despise how passive he is on the court.

by FishStix on Nov 8, 2009 5:57 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Mikki Moore has been in the league since 98; care to guess why?

I’ll tell you: It’s because he’s SEVEN FEET tall and not totally incompetent.

You gotta problem with Moore or the game of basketball itself? Because he’s not a starter, he’s just a 7’0 guy you stick on the bench until garbage time or when someone goes down. He’s insurance. If he was seven feet tall with considerable skill, he’d be VERY valuable, hence not an insurance player.

Andris and Ronnie go down and people are complaining about Moore?

He is what he is.

by Jeremy Belvins on Nov 8, 2009 7:12 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Right now the poll is 90%-9% or 205 votes in favor of starting Randolph to 21 in favor of starting Moore.

 Moore should be the guy at the end of your bench who only plays in blowouts when you’ve given all your prospect guys their minutes. How the hell has he collected a pay cheque in this league for 11 years? Although i have seen on his wikipedia page he is the all time leader for blocked shots at the University of Nebraska…so i guess thats something.

This is what the warriors need to do:

1)Fire Nelson, he does not deserve to get the last 20 something games to get the all time record for winnning games for a coach, that would be an embarassment. It would be like letting Moore play long enough to get the all time point scoring record.

2)Get Randolph his minutes! 30+ a game no matter what. And if that cant happen please throw him in when you trade Jackson to my Cavs, we would actually use him.

by CavsLebronFan on Nov 8, 2009 9:18 PM PST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Thing About Randolph...
76968623_small
Very realistic Monta Ellis trade
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
Stack Jax for Radman: The Numbers
Small
Thank You, Jack
Allen-iverson-tattoos_small
Bucks-Warriors Analysis From Witness @ The Game

Recent FanPosts

Small
Matt Steinmetz reports Warriors sign Chris Hunter from D-League
Small
Time Will Tell (and Curry > Jennings)
Dscn0324_small
The TK Challenge
Follett_small
Further Cap Relief for the Warriors, But the Bottom Line is Who Cares?
Small
The Inevitable Trade of Ellis... Proposal
Small
Monta Trade that Makes Sense
Small
Replace Ellis with Iverson for the rest of the year!
K_man_13_1_small
Haven't we seen this movie before?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae