Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: New media and the Loss of Sportsmanship

Who is your starting 5 if you ran the team?


I think we have alot of talent so some decisions are close.  These are my 5

 

C-Biedrins

PF-Randolph

SF-Jackson

SG-Morrow

PG-Ellis

Rotation-Curry, Maggette,Turiaf, Azubuike, Moore

I think Curry should come off the bench to back-up Ellis and spot Morrow at times.  Maggette will back-up Jackson, Turiaf backs up Biedrins, and Azubuike basically gets squeezed out of the rotation (few minutes at back up SG, but not enough).  I like him more than Maggette, but how can we trade Maggette without playing him (that wont happen either, but I can dream right?)  Wright would back-up Randolph, but since he is hurt we have to deal with the corpse called Mikki Moore to back him up.  What do people think of my rotation and starting 5?  What would you do?  (Need something to talk about besides Jackson's trade request and Nellie forgetting he coaches the Warriors)

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

0 recs  |  Comment 64 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

pg- Curry
sg- Morrow
SF- Law
PF- Watson
C- Randolph

did you see our +/- when we ran that team last night?! amazing!

by tafkasam on Nov 9, 2009 8:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but that was against the Kings

How could CJ at 6’2" and 175 work as PF consistently

by Throw up the Dub on Nov 9, 2009 9:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

One problem

Did you see Sac’s lineup when that team had there seemingly “amazing +/-”?

You’re telling me you’re not gonna start Ellis? and Law and Watson are staters?

I’d go with this:
PG – Curry
SG – Ellis
SF – Jackson till he’s traded then Buke
PF – Randolph
C – Biedres

Ideally I think we should try to get a real PF even if it costs us Ellis…That’s why I was excited about the possibility of Amare (Not that he’s necessarily the right guy, but that idea). Ideally with the team we have now what our starters should be is:

PG – Curry
SG – Morrow
SF – Randolph
PF – (Whoever we trade for that is legit here)
C – Biedres

by WarriorSth on Nov 9, 2009 10:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

my post was 100% serious

No Sarcasm in CJ @ the 4.

by tafkasam on Nov 9, 2009 10:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

5 Games into the season

And already its extremely painful to watch the Warriors play. A lot of our poor play has to be chalked up to Don Nelson’s inconistent lineups and complete lack of emphasis on Defense, but I think its been understated how much we’ve missed a healthy Turiaf and Biedrins in the middle (let alone Wright.) We’ve had absolutely no rebounding and no blocked shots, people just score inside at will or get a second shot to sink in. If we are going to make any sort of trade for Jackson, it better be for a rebounder.

by Pearlsofwisdom on Nov 9, 2009 10:28 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

+1

This would be an excellent lineup. Great shooting and rebounding team, and it would definitely be fun to watch if nothing else.

by WYK on Nov 9, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like it EXCEPT

I’d try a string of games with Buike at the point, alongside Monta, with Morrow at SF.

PG Buike
SF Monta
SF Morrow
PF Randolph
C Biedrins

Buike brings strength, stability, and defense at the guard spot that he can’t bring as an undersized Don Nelson “forward.” He’s a natural G. And even if he is not ideally built for an “uptempo” offense, he’s an unselfish “team first” guy, he has brains, he passes, can drive AND hit the three, and he takes care of the ball, unlike Nelson’s current “point” options. (See: Monta, Jackson, etc.)

As for the rest, Curry needs to come off the bench until he proves he belongs in the starting line-up (i.e. shoots over 40 percent) Jackson needs to go to a strip club, and Morrow needs to LEAD the team in shots (not get ignored for 70 percent of the game) if this team has any chance at competing on the NBA level.

by formerlythecity on Nov 9, 2009 1:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+37000

Highly agree with this lineup, sam23.

Honestly, i dont care if this is not a starting lineup.

I WANT this LINEUP 30+ mpg.

Curry, Morrow and AR probably have the best chemistry on this team.

Curry knows to pass the rock to A-Mo more, and if we could just get the bigs to set screens for Morrow…we could be talking some serious lightz 0ut.

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 9, 2009 3:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep, I think that’s the one. Requires Randolph to settle down, but this is a hypothetical anyway, so let’s just say we ply him with a mild sedative before tipoff each night.

It’s too bad that Monta-as-sixth-man seems like a sort of taboo concept, because he could really be dynamite as a change-of-pace guy.

by onlxn on Nov 9, 2009 3:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s taboo because generally you try to get your best players a lot of minutes…

by Missing Barry on Nov 9, 2009 6:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

doesnt mean he won’t play a lot minutes

Thing A

by sam23 on Nov 9, 2009 6:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It would only work in the Manu Ginobili fashion

I.e. If we are a championship contender and Monta’s basically assured the “6th man of the year” accolade. If not, Monta’s gonna be pissed that he’s not given a more influential role. Everybody’s happy with bit parts when the team’s cruising. However, when you’re AI in Memphis sitting behind OJ Mayo and Mike Conley, and your team is losing games to the Warriors, you get pretty pissed that you aren’t given more of a chance to win a few games.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 10, 2009 4:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Curry
Monta
Buike
Randolph
Biedrins

Morrow + Maggette first wings off the bench, obviously Turiaf is the first big off the bench. Try not to play Maggette at 4 as much as possible, though obviously he’s going to have to do it while Wright’s out.

by Missing Barry on Nov 9, 2009 10:49 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Curry
Ellis
Buike
Jackson
Biedrins

With Turiaf 1st off the bench in for Curry. For me Randolph would be the 2nd PF in the game and Morrow would split the minutes of Jackson and Buike on the wing with Maggette as 4th option off the bench either at SF or PF. I’d run Ellis out there as long as his body can take it playing a mix of both PG and SG.

A Sonics fan without a team... but after 6 seasons now of GS Warriors season tickets have convinced me to adopt the boys from Oakland.

by mcwalter44 on Nov 9, 2009 10:53 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf for Curry? Jackson at the PF? Interesting choices

by Bellringer21 on Nov 9, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson can’t play PF. Simply put – he rebounds like a PG, which is not going to get it done at the 4.

by Missing Barry on Nov 9, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

But if he can get the starting PF in Foul trouble by bring him out to the wing to contest his jumpers and drives then we can bring a more traditional lineup with Turiaf or Randolph at PF.

A Sonics fan without a team... but after 6 seasons now of GS Warriors season tickets have convinced me to adopt the boys from Oakland.

by mcwalter44 on Nov 10, 2009 8:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on rebs

But, if Jackson can get the starting PF in foul trouble by bring him out on the wing to contest his jumpers and drives, then it would be a push in terms of his rebounds and lack of size in the post. Once the PF is in foul trouble you can bring in Randolph to play the PF or if that doesn’t work Turiaf in for Curry sliding Jaxs to SF, Buike to SG and Monta to PG.

A Sonics fan without a team... but after 6 seasons now of GS Warriors season tickets have convinced me to adopt the boys from Oakland.

by mcwalter44 on Nov 10, 2009 8:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is just silly

Jackson isn’t a dominant wing player. He’s not going to get anyone in foul trouble. By and large, other teams are HAPPY when Jackson tries to dominate by constantly shooting or driving on his man.

If it was that easy to get other PFs in foul trouble, you’d see teams go small all the time. But it doesn’t work.

by Ronaldinho on Nov 10, 2009 10:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mine goes like this

Pg. Ellis
Sg. Jackson
Sf. Randolph
Pf. Turiaf
C. Biedrins

This lineup makes me happy. Once Jackson is gone substitute Morrow at the 2.

by JLopez on Nov 9, 2009 11:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

PG Curry
SG Morrow
SF Azubuike
PF Randolph
C Biedrinis

for the rest of the season each and every game. I’d sent Monta and Jack home until I could trade them.

by Jagz8 on Nov 9, 2009 11:38 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Ah yes, sending our best player home is always a great solution. It also will really help his trade value…

by Missing Barry on Nov 9, 2009 12:52 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Monta? What's he done?

Other than being the heart and soul of the team….. If we did that imagine how far the rest of our players would fall. You send players home that are always whining. Monta isn’t whining.

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 9, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he's not done any better for them right now.

he’s not making anyone else better, his defense is awful with the exception of a few spurts and his presence can only hinder Curry’s growth. I’d get rid of him and if I couldn’t I’d send him home. He would certainly bitch if he had to come off the bench.

by Jagz8 on Nov 9, 2009 3:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair, Curry’s been getting abused even worse than Monta on defense so far.

I ain’t hatin’ on Monta. He’s a good player, and his heart seems to be in the right place… I like that he seems bothered by how we’re playing. I don’t think sidelining the guy is the answer. But I do think refining his role a bit could help both him and the team. He’s trying to do everything for us right now, and as good as he is, he’s not that kind of player.

by onlxn on Nov 9, 2009 3:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Curry’s D has one on one D has been spotty as expected he is a rookie, but for this team standards his D has been ok. His team defense is solid.

I just don’t like what I’m seeing from him right now attitude or playing wise. If he didn’t seem bothered by us losing right now I’d be even more concerned. He plays well in spurts and the reverts back to chuck and duck. His D is really lacking besides a few steals. I’d like to see how he plays when Jack is off the team and if that’s the problem then I’m all for him, but if this is what he is then I don’t really care for it. He had the upside to be a Bradon Roy caliber player, he’s still where he was 2 years ago unfortunately.

by Jagz8 on Nov 9, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is easy.

pg – Anthony randolph
sg – Steph Curry
Sf- Anthony Morrow
PF- Ronny Turiaf
C – Andris Biedrins

6th Man – Monta
7th man – Jackson

Corey Maggette would get 0 minutes a game/ DNP – coach’s decision unless it was obvious garbage time

by JimBarnett2KevinGarnett on Nov 9, 2009 12:44 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'd love to see this experimented with AR running point...

But I still think sam23’s lineup is the best option for us right now.

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 9, 2009 3:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Curry
Morrow
Mags (assuming he returns to career form, rather than being the mediocre player he’s been much of this season so far)
Randolph
Biedrins.

Monta comes off the bench, but plays the same number of minuets as Curry and Morrow, split between the two guard spots.

Buike gets as many minutes as Mags at the three, and supplants him there if Mags doesn’t return to form.

Turiaf backs up the 4 and 5.

by Ronaldinho on Nov 9, 2009 1:07 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

my 5

PG – Curry
SG – Ellis
SF – Buike
PF – AR
C – Biedrins

Off the bench order:
1. Morrow
2. Turiaf
3. Maggette
4 – whatevers. who cares?
Absolutely last: Moore

by HireMeAsGM on Nov 9, 2009 1:31 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

1- Curry
2- ME
3- Buike
4-AR
5-Beans

Ammo, Ronny, Jack, Maggs (bench in this order)

Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"

by dubzfan on Nov 9, 2009 2:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Are you that good of a shooter? Wow!

Thing C

by markdash on Nov 10, 2009 11:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rick Barry
Jamaal WIlkes
Clifford Ray
Derrek Dickey
George Johnson
They’re only 60, I bet they can still play better in the half court than the current roster

by warriorsvictim on Nov 9, 2009 2:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Seriously though...

You have to play whichever 5 have the best chemistry. We dont know what happens in practice, but I like what I see with these guys:

Curry
Morrow
Buike
Turiaf
Biedrins

I would love to put Randolph in there, but he is still too raw. Another year and he might be ready to start every game

by warriorsvictim on Nov 9, 2009 2:27 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting....

I think we have no chance to make the playoffs this year, so we want Randolph to develop as much as possible. Obviously we do want to win some games, but if we dont develop the young players our future is bleaker.

by Bellringer21 on Nov 9, 2009 2:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

UM...
…we want Randolph to develop as much as possible

Is that what the Development League, aka D-League, for? Seriously, if your that concerned then why don’t we just send him some where were he’ll get consistent minutes play the 4 and 5 spots? Otherwise, he should man up and stop complaining about his pt, because he just isn’t ready yet. This is another reason why leaving early isn’t for every play. Obviously it’s the smart financial move, but he’s got to realize that he needs to really work on his game. It looks like he has… especially if you look back at how he look at this time last season. That said, you don’t want to throw him into a situation were he’s out matched to the point of being completely dominated on the defensive end.

I’m not saying he needs to go to the D-League, but the idea of just throwing him out there at the 4 or 5 blindly just for the sake of “development” seems like short side/instant gratification reaction.

A Sonics fan without a team... but after 6 seasons now of GS Warriors season tickets have convinced me to adopt the boys from Oakland.

by mcwalter44 on Nov 10, 2009 8:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

One caveat...

Turiaf and Biedrins never double team anyone together. It is ok to try to go up for a blocked shot from the weak side, but there can be no more constant fouls.
It would be better to give up 2 points and get it back on the other end than to have them in constant foul trouble

by warriorsvictim on Nov 9, 2009 2:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hi, my name is Don Nelson

Here’s my ideal starting 5:

Curry – Man, I love the kid. I’m really excited about what he can do. He’s a little young, but hey, he’s way better than CJ or Acie.
Monta – I’m just waiting for him to get his shooting stroke back, and actually be comfortable being a shooting guard. If Monta can get his jumper back, he’ll make up for his limitations on defense.
SJax – I need him out there because he’s the only guy I can count on to remotely hold the Kobes of the NBA in check. I just wish he wouldn’t be so dumb on the other end of the court.
Randolph – Man, I wish this kid were ready. He’s really exciting when he’s in a groove, and he can do so many things and take advantage of pretty much any match up on him. He’s like my dream player. Problem is, he has no (expletive) idea what he’s doing out there. Which means I have to start Turiaf or (shudders) Mikki Moore because Brandan is perpetually injured.
Biedrins – He’s solid. He does his job, scores well enough to keep defenses honest, and at least tries to man the paint.

That’s my ideal starting five, only problem is:
Curry’s just a rookie
Monta’s jumper isn’t back to form, and he feels threatened by Curry and is trying to do too much
Jax still does his Kobe impression on offense (he doesn’t seem to get the idea that I’m having him watch the film so he can spot tendencies and defend them, he seems to think he’s supposed to emulate Kobe on offense)
Randolph has no idea what he’s doing
Biedrins is injured.

So, my starting five just isn’t showing up at any position.

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 9, 2009 2:40 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It does not matter

It does not matter until we run an actual offensive set. Why are we running a motion offense that never gives us a look at the basket that is within 10 feet. It boggles my mind that we have such a crappy offensive set. We set horrible screens, we seldom look for the roll on a pick and roll. We don’t trust any of our big men to actually post up. I am sorry but I would rather let Beidrins and Randolph attempt post moves from 6 feet in then let Jack, Maggs, Curry, and Monta let fly from 20 feet plus.

At least trying to work the ball in the paint will give us a chance to get an offensive rebound. Last night all we did was shoot and have 5 people run back on defense (4 if Jackson tried to make a layup; or 4 if Beidrins was in because he actually tried to rebound).

I will say this, Randolph looked stiff last night. He looked like a man with a sore back and def wasn’t at 100%. However, he has looked timid all season when he plays which is sign that he fears his coach doesn’t trust him to be a playmaker. He drops f bombs after each mistake because he knows he might get pulled.

So you want to win… Learn to set a screen, Learn to pass to the roll on the pick and roll, learn to enter the post with an actual big man. Learn an offensive that isn’t a motion offense. That works in college, and in high school. But not in the NBA. Time to grow up.

Starters:

Monta
Jack
Buike
Randolph
Beidrins

First off bench by possition:
Curry
Morrow
Maggs
Turiaf
Mikki Moore

I know your old but time to grow up Nellie. Can we at least try playing a traditional offense. Spread the floor hit the high post, look to the low post or swing. It is not rocket science and we have enough talent to make it work.

by shooter1525 on Nov 9, 2009 2:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

PG-Curry
SG-Monta
SF-LeBron
PF-Randolph
C-Biedrins

OWENS! OWENS! OWENS! OWENS!
- Joe Starkey

by 9ersDubsGiantSharks on Nov 9, 2009 3:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I like this lineup best.

by Missing Barry on Nov 9, 2009 6:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No.

Guess you haven’t been a Warrior fan long enough.

Lebron would get injured for the rest of the year after the 7th game.

Just like Amare woulda got injured after game 8.

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 10, 2009 12:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t say I agree with your take at all. The biggest problem we’ve had is a lack of talent, not talent getting injured since I’ve been following the team in the early 90’s (and yes, I do own a hat with a Victor Alexander autograph). We ran Webber off, obviously, but other than that, it’s been situation where we get a top pick in years where the best guys are Mike Dunleavy or Antawn Jamison, and when drafts like Lebron/Melo/Wade/Bosh come around, we’re nowhere to be found. It’s been a timing/bad drafting issue….

So yeah, what that means is there’s no way we’d ever get Lebron in the first place.

by Missing Barry on Nov 10, 2009 7:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was just kidding.

and overexaggerating like I never do.

I agree that we have missed several times in the draft when we’ve had top picks, which concludes to my overexaggerated statement that implies we just always seem to have bad warrior luck.

Even if we were to get Lebron James miraculously, someway somehow… something would go wrong, whether it be a long time injury, player becomes digruntled because of ownership\coaches and then leaves, or a potentially good player ends up with a bruised ego for us, leaves us and then becomes a very good player.

I know this type of scenario happens with a lot of organizations, but for organizations like the Warriors it is ridiculous for it to happen continuously for a very very long stretch of time.

I know there are a lot of Ike Diogu haters, but I liked him when he was here and I liked the pick during the time. The thing is, we missed big time on that one when we could have drafted Danny Granger who I also really wanted during that time.

Oh well.

Victor Alexander was still dope.

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 10, 2009 10:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I know what you were saying…we’re Warriors fans man, we’re all in the same boat. It’s tough. I just think a lot of our bad era can be explained by timing misfortune. Just think if that ping pong ball came up with us #1 instead of the Spurs and we landed Duncan…

by Missing Barry on Nov 10, 2009 11:53 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ya...we would sucked severly for 3 years until...

2000-01.

and maybe we could have had a team of:

Chris Porter
Larry Hughes
Antawn Jamison
Marc Jackson
Tim Duncan

off the bench:

Vonteego Cummings
Chris Mullin
Chris Mills
Adonal Foyle

(ya. still a crappy team. but the next season, the roster would have progressed to…..

[see next post] )

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 10, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

2001-2002 roster

Arenas
Jrich
Troy murphy
Antawn Jamison
Tim Duncan

off the bench:
Adonal Foyle
Bobby bawSura
Chris Mills
Larry Hughes

That woulda been nice. Gary St. Jean would have been considered a genius if would could have kept this core.

Bleh. Would could talk about this for days with all the What if’s.

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 10, 2009 12:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

PG – Curry
SG – Jackson (when he’s traded, than Morrow)
SF – Azubuike
PF – Randolph
C – Biedrins

I like Curry starting because to me he seems like a better PG than Ellis. He seems to try and get more ball movement involved rather than just shooting it. Also, it’s his rookie year and the Dubs are going nowhere so they might as well let him develop. Ellis and Maggette will probably get a lot of playing time too, but coming off the bench. This lineup is good because it can match up with other teams sizes rather than the small ball lineup the Dubs have now.

by DubsFan408 on Nov 9, 2009 3:38 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Will Ellis handle coming off the bench well?

Might as well start him every game and let a different group of fab five come off the bench to dominate in minutes if that group miraculously becomes productive.

I still like Ellis on our team, still think he can help this team win, but I would assume Ellis would not like being a player coming off the bench to this type of team.

Coming off the bench for the Lakers he would say yes. To the Warriors? Umm…I would assume “Hail no.”

Romes Mac Mojous

by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Nov 9, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ellis
Buike
Jackson
Randolf
Biedrens

Bench-
Morrow
curry
Ronnie
law

WE SUCK

by stevenro59 on Nov 9, 2009 4:10 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Ellis – Curry
Azubuike – Morrow
Jackson – Maggette
Turiaf – Randolph – Maggette when needed
Biedrins – Randolph

I wish Randolph could start but he seems to have fallen off due to Nellie’s craziness/media hype.

Sad, that even after I put this lineup together…I still wouldn’t expect 35 wins.

by dong4ce on Nov 9, 2009 4:44 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

oops

I meant 25…sadly.

by dong4ce on Nov 9, 2009 4:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here is my lineup

this is the smartest lineup if we want to stay competetive
Monta 30
Jackson only 30 a night
Corey Maggette only 25
Randolph at least 25 we need him to develop and he is our best bet
Biedrins at least 30
 
Have steph be a sixth man
this gives us a really solid bench with Azubukie Morrow Turiaf CJ and Moore coming off the bench
I hat Corey too but we need his size and rebounding

There are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq Chuck Norris lives in Texas

by Mike Fox on Nov 9, 2009 5:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

love this game

1-Ellis
2-Buike
3-Jackson
4-Turiaf
5-Biedrins
IMO this is our best starting line up. We’re fairly big yet we can still run. Buike and Jackson can both stretch the floor, turiaf can hit the 15 footer, and Ellis can get to the hole when he wants, Jackson can help Ellis get the ball to Biedrins, and we shouldn’t get killed on the boards. Buike is a good rebounding guard and this is a seasoned squad.

2nd sting
1-curry
2-morrow
3-maggette
4-randolph
5-moore
curry is needed more with the 2nd string players because morrow and randolph both need to be assisted to score effeciently. Maggette shouldn’t play more than 25 minutes a game to keep him healthy and packaging Moore with Randolph at least gives us some length.

by Balance on Nov 9, 2009 5:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Well i

believe we need to just blow this team up. Larry Ellison buys the team fires our whole front office(maybe except Riley) and trade everyone. Try and keep Randolph, Curry, Morrow, Andris, Ronny, Bukie and maybe Wright and just have a full youth movement. We are most likely going to have a losing season anyway sowhy not lose and develop or young guys instead of playing Monta, Jack, and Maggette 40 mins every game. My lineup would be something like this in full Youth movement
Curry/CJ/Law
Morrow/?
Bukie/?
Randolph/Wright when he gets back
Andris/Ronny/Moore

Golden State Warriors Fan 4 Life!!!
The Golden Future
PF: Anthony Randolph
PG: Stephen Curry
Can't wait until GS wins a championship!!!

by GSW9 on Nov 9, 2009 5:36 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I wish Marco was still on the team...

But since he’s not here’s what I’d throw out there

Curry
Monta
Morrow
Jackson
Biedrins

bench

Law
Buike
Maggette
Randolph*
Wright*

*interchangeable

"Maybe I need somebody that can save me from the parts of myself that keep making me crazy" -Slug-

by drizztismoneybaby on Nov 9, 2009 5:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

PG – Watson
SG – Ellis
SF – Jack
PF – Randolph
 C – Biedrins

by LoGiiK on Nov 9, 2009 6:04 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I dont like curry starting. He is a great player but i dont want him starting just yet.

by LoGiiK on Nov 9, 2009 6:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting

I see Curry as the type of young player who would benefit from starting a lot of games, while Randolph might hurt the team starting and playing heavy minutes.
Curry has a control that Randolph is lacking, and being a shooter, he needs a ton of reps so he knows how to get his shot up in front of NBA caliber defenders

This year is a throw away anyway. So I would start Curry no matter what this season

by warriorsvictim on Nov 10, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

For starters...for breathers

1Monte
2Buike
3Jackson
4Randolph
5Andris

Curry
Watson
Morrow
Maggette
Turiaf

by MAN99LAW on Nov 11, 2009 4:52 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I will have to do some trades first

Trade Monta Ellis for Rip Hamilton straight up

Move AR to starting small forward

Reach a buyout deal with Stephen Jackson

Trade Andris Biedrins and Brandan Wright for a big and strong center ( We all know Biedrins will get killed against Pau Gasol, D12, Shaq and so-on)

Lineup: PG: Curry
                SG: Rip
                SF: AR4
                PF: Turiaf
                 C: Kendrick Perkins or Tyson Chandler

Bench: Morrow, Moore, Azubuike, Law, Watson, Maggette ( we are a little thin on the frontcourt still so we should get a nice backup like Brendan Haywood package Watson Claxton and a 2nd round for him and I think we got a deal

Also eliminate all that run and gun crap. Sure it is fun to watch but that will get us nowhere.I think we should adopt the Lakers or Celtics style of play. Now that is a move we need to do

 I think we should fire Don Nelson and then we promote Keith Smart to head coach. Smart is more of a defensive coach so are defensive stats should go up. If we do all of that which is very very unlikely, we will be a good team

Fear is the Mind Killer

by dubzero23 on Nov 11, 2009 11:58 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
FANS VS. COHAN 2.0 :: You Won't Want to Miss This <--------------
Small
Nelson and his record ...
Small
A Big Man That Could Help Us
Bimbo_quote_small
Giant Public Relations Monster Devours Gilbert Arenas

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Warriors Should Follow the Thunders Example
Small
2010 NBA Draft: Evan Turner (Possibly better than John Wall at the next level) and Hassan Whiteside (sleeper center)
76968623_small
Highly Radical Rebuilding Plan
Sonic_rip_small
ESPN's Hollinger calls Ellis Overrated
Ramiele_small
Better chance at Wall or new coach?
Sp_baron_edited_small
Contest: What will Monta's Points Scored & Shooting % be tonight?
Small
2 Reasons the Warriors shouldnt draft John Wall
Small
Waiving Claxton Might Be a Good Sign
Small
Trade Idea with Wizards
Images_small
Warriors Should Go After Iguodala

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

West_coast_promo_fb_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae

Small IQofaWarrior

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot