I think we might eventually need to trade Jamal to make room fror Marco

If you looked at his stats as a starter this year he put up 15 points and 4 assist, i think next year his stats would bump up to 17 and 5? im not sure but i know were going to eventually need to get rid of jamal, who would you guys pick, Jamal or Marco?

over 3 years ago gswfan1 10 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

well jamal will most likely terminate his contract after this season. he has never been to the playoffs and would probably want to play for a playoff team.

by gorillas on Feb 10, 2009 10:46 PM PST reply actions

i agree

by Fi7ipin0ch3f on Feb 10, 2009 11:03 PM PST up reply actions

I wouldn't mind if that happens

While I like Crawford-the-person, Crawford-the-player is inconsistent, which I think stems from his nice-guy-ness and lack of assertiveness. Plus Marco is more well rounded in skill set, and Marco has shown that he can now defensively harass the opponent.

by IQofaWarrior on Feb 10, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions

but with the team getting healthy and probabaly going to play

good ball, I see him staying. Rememeber he wants to stay on the West Coast and I can’t see him going to any other West Coast team. Also teams are trying to dump for 2010-11, so next year NO ONE is getting any large or max contract.

by dungeness crabdribble on Feb 11, 2009 7:28 AM PST up reply actions

Marco

Marco is younger and can be developed more. Did I also mention that he won’t require as much money as Jamal? I would definitely miss Jamal though; very classy guy.

Ellis to the RIM!
Monta for the win?! YES!

by XIAOXIAO on Feb 10, 2009 11:15 PM PST reply actions

damn i'd hate to lose crawford

he’s got all those nifty moves; he can hit those big shots and he’s got this swagger (think win over pacers where he put back his hand guns in his invisible holsters after hitting a clutch 3). but i mean if he opts out and goes somewhere else i ain’t trippin.