Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

RECAP: Warriors 119, Mavs 110: Now that’s what I’m talking about!

3cc2b76f-fc32-4dcd-8723-9083e71cdfaa_medium

We want more!

Warriors finally show a little heart and spunk and guess what ... we beat the Mavs 119 to 110 Friday night. The best part was watching our young guys do it all by themselves. With Brandan Wright starting against Dirk, Monta looking as good as ever, and the combo of Randolph and Buike coming off the bench, it was too much for the Texas playoff team to handle. Who knew?

This was the type of game I needed to see, the type of game that put my irritation and grumpiness away for a little while and reminds me why I love the Warriors so much. Let's just pray this develops into a more consistent thing. But for now let's give props to the guys who won the game in our own home tonight shall we?

Jump:

 


 

Star-divide

C8d8fb82-99ec-4794-95f8-f306b360d2d9_medium

Let's hope it's nothing serious!

First off for the bad news. Andris went down in the first half with what looked like an ankle sprain or something. I'm no doctor but I'm sure we'll hear more about it tomorrow. This season hasn't panned out as plan for Biens but I'm hoping it's nothing serious and he'll be back as soon as possible. Get well Biens!

Now for the good news:

The game was fun to watch. Dallas had a 2 point lead after the first quarter but the Warriors quickly gained control and lead the rest of the way. They did it by hustle and determination. The best part is that they played like a team and I don't remember the Warriors grabbing that many rebounds (40) in a game in a long time.

Monta Ellis: He's been getting a lot of crap recently and for good reason but it was fun watching him play tonight. As days go by it looks as though he's getting his groove back and had a nice game with 29 points, 3 assists and 11 rebounds. Monta was everywhere tonight. Flying past Jason Kidd, running around the screens, he showed the quickness we missed so dearly when he was out. Granted his defense was lacking as Jason Kidd recorded yet another triple double with 21 points, 11 rebounds and 10 assists, but I'll take that if we win. Too much talk about his depression or in-house fighting with the staff, etc. I just want to see this kid get back on track and become the star we know he can become.

 

2736e562-3a0f-45ff-8e56-dde187fa844b_medium

Anthony Randolph: If it takes me bagging on him every single time to get this kind of performance out of him, then I'll do it! I was surprised he didn't start, but I think Nellie knew what he was doing when he had Randolph coming off the bench and playing for 21 minutes. Randolph had a productive game notching 14 points and 7 assists. Even better were his 3 blocks that could have been 5 for the game. In his post game interview he mentioned a competition he has with Turiaf each time to see who can get the most blocks. Imagine a healthy team of Randolph, Biens, Turiaf and Wright blocking shots? Now that's a great thought! It was nice to hear him speak about humility and hard work. That's the type of stuff that makes fans want to root for you. In the game AR did a good job hustling back on D and converting free throws, but the highlight for me was his stat for turnovers ... 0!

2f620ad5-0790-408f-9f46-62926cac94cd_medium

Next time just hit him on the head AR!

 

Brandan Wright: Here's another guy I don't like to give too much credit too, but seeing him come back from injury was nice. I practically wrote him off the team a couple months ago. For that I was wrong. I enjoyed watching him play tonight even thought he only played 15 minutes. Wright scored 12 points and grabbed 5 boards. I still think he has a long way to go but I was pleasantly surprised by his performance. Why Nellie started him I have no idea but it will be interesting to see how much playing time he gets for the rest of the season and whether or not he'll start other games.  

Turiaf & Buike: The perfect role players. Turiaf came in when Biens went down and helped Randolph control the paint with blocked shots and important rebounds. On the offense Buike shot the ball well scoring 14 points and grabbing 4 rebounds. With Maggette out for the game these two guys gave us a deep bench to rely on and control whatever the Mavs threw at us. Terry and Singleton from the Mavs also had a nice game off the bench but in the end couldn't help their starting lineup like ours could.

Warrior Wonder: Lastly, I have to give the Warrior Wonder to Stephen Jackson. My last recap and preview I called him out for his inability to lead this young team and not teach them how to keep their composure and close out games. But tonight he did just that. With some nice stats of 31 points, 10 assists and 7 rebounds, Captain Jack did an even better job of keeping the Warriors from losing this game. The Mav's were pressing and trying to break the 10 point deficit in the fourth, but in the end it was Jackson that controlled the game and kept our lead. With 3 minutes to go he forced a 3 point foul off of Jason Terry that basically took the wind out of the Mav's sail. I know it's hard with such young players, but this is the type of performance I expect from Jackson every night. He doesn't have to score all the time, but he needs to lead by example and spread the ball around. Without a true point guard, we need all the assists we can get and tonight Jackson was a big one.

 

Ebb65400-44af-4172-bece-399bcb39ad63_medium

all images via a.espncdn.com



 

 



 

 

0 recs  |  Comment 119 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

wow

totally snubbed turiaf.

turiaf deserved one for this one or last games.

He totally controlled the paint this game.

by saintdee on Mar 13, 2009 11:42 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

agreed

this game was won cause we totally intimidated them from going to paint.
co-warrior wonders- RT and AR

by KeepdaCore on Mar 13, 2009 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

honorable mention- BW

for coming back strong. nice to see him again.

by KeepdaCore on Mar 13, 2009 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 bigs on the floor

it’s amazing to see how well this team can play when they actually play a 4 and a 5 at the same time. Hell the won the rebounding battle two games straight.

by jtrosa on Mar 14, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats a big @$$ armpit!

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 13, 2009 11:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

his tats look like shit. with a 66 million dollar contract (oh sorry, $63 million now) you would think he could afford some quality work. maybe he figured he had to cut expensise now that he was fined 3 mill.

by jnormous on Mar 14, 2009 1:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve seen him get some stuff done at a tattoo parlor last season that I go to. Ricky’s Tattoos in Alameda around Chinatown.

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Mar 14, 2009 2:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he needs some japanese artwork

come on now monta. you live in the yay and you dont follow the trends? Even Lebron has a sleeve

by bojangles408 on Mar 14, 2009 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he needs some japanese artwork?

   He needs to think about what he’s gonna look like when he’s 50 years old and still sporting out of date crap on his body :>)

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

He kinda looks 50 in that photo…

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 14, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, my wife calls him "gramps"

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about.....

no tattoos? Is that still in?

Kelenna is mine...;>

by girltothemax on Mar 14, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is that still in?

  That’s next week’s hot item

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeee

Kelenna’s all about that (:

I love Kelenna David Azubuike! <333

by goldenstatelove on Mar 14, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: he needs some japanese artwork

Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.

by bloodsweatndonuts on Mar 14, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i'm gonna go out on a limb

and say we will beat the lakers in LA on TNT next thursday!

by Dub4lif3 on Mar 13, 2009 11:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh god, I hope so

If EVERYONE is completely healthy, we have a good chance. Keep the dream alive!!

by FishStix on Mar 14, 2009 1:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Randolph was the reason why we were beating the Lakers last time

The Warriors gained the lead in the 1st quarter and maintained that lead the rest of the game, but then Randolph got benched after his 5th foul and all of a sudden the Lakers got momentum and retook the lead to win the game.

If Randolph never got that 5th foul (or if Nellie decided to keep playing him) the Warriors would have probably won the game.

Another thing is that Azubuike wasn’t playing and we really needed him. Luke Walton kept posting up Jamal Crawford and it was hurting the Warriors. If Azubuike plays in the next game vs the Lakers then the Lakers won’t have that many mismatches against us like the Walton/Crawford mismatch.

by Precise Films Productions on Mar 14, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To all you Monta Haters!!!

Do you still want to trade Monta? Warriors are 2-0 since him coming back. The guy is the best player on the team… by far. He’s a difference maker, and he proved it tonight.

Remember this guy???

Remember how Monta Ellis really plays basketball???

Its hard for some fans to appreciate his superhuman abilities when they haven’t seen it in a year. Well here you go.

Monta is our future. Except it. Embrace him.

by Gurthy on Mar 13, 2009 11:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL...cant wait 2 see the reply's!

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 13, 2009 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

AR didn't start

because Nellie says that injuries don’t cause you to lose your starting job. So he had to start Wright, which wasn’t a bad thing either.

A HUGE HUGE HUGE Honorable Mention goes to Turiaf, for anchoring the defense when Biedrins was out. He was blocking and changing shots left and right out there.

Welcome back Wright! He looked like he’s been here all year! Monta looked great too, exploding to the basket for a dunk, HAAAAAANNNNNGING and still putting in another shot, and high jumping for rebounds. He’s on his way back to being his old self.

Morrow might not have shot that well, but I definitely seem him fighting for rebounding position under the basket.

Crawford is still the odd man out, and I think everything about this has already been said elsewhere.

For those that wonder where Wright went, I suspect that Nellie went to smaller quicker players in the 2nd half to do his 2007 playoffs double team on Dirk. Or it could also be Nellie not overworking a guy who just came back from injury.

YaoButtaMing, you covered just about everything else I wanted to say. Biedrins/Turiaf + Wright/Randolph is a terrific front court. Biedrins + Wright are better on offense, but Turiaf + Randolph are monsters on defense. That’s depth. That’s teamwork. That’s a sweet 4-hit punch combo to the opponent.

by IQofaWarrior on Mar 14, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Awesome to see Wright back and on form. Wright and the new, more disciplined Randolph really could make for a pretty interesting power forward tandem. I’m not saying I don’t want Blake Griffin, but we may be onto something here.

Branthony Wrightdolph tonight: 36 minutes, 26 points (on 17 shots), 12 boards, 3 assists, 3 blocks, 3 steals, 1 turnover. That is a damn good night for a starting power forward. Yes, it’s only one game, but let’s remember — these guys have both been playing around this level for awhile now. Wright plays high-accuracy, moderate-rebounding basketball; Randolph makes more mistakes, but makes some plays that Wright can’t, as well It’s a pretty interesting one-two punch.

Obviously great to see Monta coming along, and several guys had great games, but to me, the most exciting thing about tonight was the 4. Good play from two young guys, and a coach who seemed to be noticing.

by onlxn on Mar 14, 2009 12:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m not saying I don’t want Blake Griffin, but we may be onto something here.

  If they keep winning these worthless games you won’t have a choice, we’ll draft too low to get him.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

whoa skeptic...

it sounds like you’re giving the stick men a little bit of credit…..could it be?

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

worthless???!??!?

 Well actually they have negative value to us so they are less than worthless.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not my boys?

   The boys aren’t useless, the wins are ! The boys can win all they want starting with the first game next season until the last game they still have a chance for playoffs. After that it’s foolish to win.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're right

he’s amazing. i think he’s the next Dwight Howard. I think we should sit everyone and have teams play 5 on him!

hahaha just playing

by YaoButtaMing on Mar 14, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just a reminder, YaoButta:

His attitude + lack of hustle + desire to showboat after one decent play = bust!

When you harsh on one of our kids that badly, you gotta expect a little playful trashtalk from the diehards… ;-)

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 14, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick thoughts...

First of all, it was great to watch Wright play again. I would have liked to see him play a bit more considering he looked good and didn’t even foul once.

I’m not sure which of our young PF’s is better right now but I think it will be interesting to see if Randolph continues to get a longer leash than Wright as the rest of the season rolls on.

I’m excited to see this group of young bigs playing together for a while. Andris, Turiaf, Wright and Randolph could be one of the better big man rotations in the league next year if everyone continues to develop at this pace.

Monta looked pretty good. He’s obviously still learning on the job but physically he looked much sharper and his shot is looking better and better. I’m beginning to feel a bit more confident that he can at least get back to what he was at the end of last season. Will he be a point guard? Who knows, but he’s got a good chunk of games to try to figure it out without the pressure of having to win.

Turiaf was a great signing. He has really done a lot for this team. To bad the season was a waste, but I’m glad we will have him moving forward. In my mind he is the glue of the frontcourt.

Predictions:
We end the season on a hot streak.
We draft Lawson somewhere in the 8-10 range.
Crawford opts out.

Next season we look something like this:

PG: Monta / Lawson
SG: Jackson / Morrow
SF: Maggs / Buike
PF: Wright / Randolph
C: Andris / Turiaf

We all hope that Monta, Wright and Randolph can improve enough to turn us into a competitive team.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 12:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

NO on the lineup

cuz maggs is in it…get maggs out!

put randolph at the 3!

1: monta/(holiday/teague/rubio)
2: jackson/morrow/buki
3: randolph/buki
4: wright/randolph/buki
5: andris/turiaf/randolph

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Mar 14, 2009 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah you're both wrong

PG: Monta / Marco
SG: Jackson / Morrow
SF: Buike / Maggette
PF: Randolph / Wright
C: Andris / Turiaf

My hope is that we can draft a decent prospect for a future PG as well, to either replace our be yet another backup for Marco / CJ.

by FishStix on Mar 14, 2009 1:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's more like

PG: Monta/Lawson
SG: Jackson/Marco/Buike
SF: Randolph/Maggette/Buike
PF: Wright/Davidson?
C: Biedrins/ Turiaf

by ZaMzAm FiRe on Mar 14, 2009 1:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

which is what i said...(as far as the starters go)

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Mar 14, 2009 2:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

THIS is the Lineup

Ok, here’s whats gonna happen, we’re gonna land the first pick overall and draft blake griffin, then we trade wright crawford (and throw in CJ for some incentive) and pick up a good backup PG and then put randolph at the 3, griffin at the 4

PG: Ellis/Backup through trade
SG: Jackson/Belinelli/Morrow
SF: Randolph/Maggette/Azubuike
PF: Griffin/Jamareo
C: Biedrins/Turiaf

And then we have a playoff team!

DO YOU STILL BELIEVE?!

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Mar 14, 2009 2:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

its this line up.

pg: Monta Ellis/Jamal Crawford(or sg)
sg: Gerald Henderson/Corey Maggette(or sf)
sf: Stephen Jackson(or sg)/Anthony Randolph(or pf)
pf: Andris Biedrins/Brandan Wright
c: Hasheem Thabeet/Ronny Turiaf

The Beginning of the "We Believe" Movement of Melbourne, Australia.

by DoomBizzle on Mar 14, 2009 5:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we should do this...

pg: monta/ cj
sg: Dwade/ marco
sf: lebron/ buike
pf: garnett/randolph
c: biedrins/turiaf

by tafkasam on Mar 14, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't you think?

 It would be more “Warriors” if Kabuki, Rudolf, and Marco start and Lebron, Garnett, and DWade come off the bench?

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

where's dwight howard?

he could be the third string center on this fantasy warrior squad!

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 15, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And then we have a playoff team?

    It would be better to get a big skilled point guard and play Montay at the 2 spot with Jax and Magette rotating in to 2 and 3 spots as needed. The Rudolf,Griffin,Rony/Andris part looks promising.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

it was a prediction not an opinion.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sober up, hawk

If we were to be blessed with Rubio he starts and we are an run-n-gun offensive Juggernaut. This team starts to look real scary on offense and defense with Rubio at the point. He’s a fantastic defender (steal machine) and passer, and big enough to guard the big 1’s like D-Will and Baron.

So we’d look more like:
1. Rubio/Monta/CJ
2. Monta/Kelenna/Morrow (aka AMo)
3. Jack/Maggs/Kelenna/Randolph
4. Randolph/Maggs
5. Beans/Turiaf

And yes, two guys are missing in that list: Wright, Marco and Crawford. We have too many guys on this team right now, so someone’s gotta move — and those are the ones I’m guessing will go. Namely because they deserve minutes somewhere, and seem to be odd men out here.

Cross your fingers Kelenna’s not on that list. If I were another team, I’d demand him in any deal — esp. if it were a deal with Crawford. Kelenna has the best contract on the team.

by b.radley on Mar 14, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is the lineup

1- monta, marco, rookie/f.a.
2-jak, ammo, f.a.
3-buike, maggs, aminu
4-randolph, wright, f.a.
5-beans, ronny, the new d league player on the warriors!

thats like 44= plus wins right there an d we would still be the youngest in the league, imagine how good this could look in 2 years!

by nateoak10 on Mar 14, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s a lineup with many, many ‘ifs’ in order to win 44 games. It requires that Randolph and Wright are for real and have an upward slope, that Jax doesn’t shoot the team out of many, many games, but most of all, it requires that the two players listed at point who haven’t shown the ability to be NBA point guards somehow become NBA point guards. Healthy, that team should win mid to high 30s, but getting over .500 requires some things that are far from certain at this point.

by jae on Mar 14, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t disagree with your general argument, but we’ve actually had real streaks of offensive success without a point guard this season (I don’t consider Crawford any more of a point guard than Monta). Monta’s not a guy who needs a point guard to be effective offensively, and neither is Maggette; Jack can create his own shot to some degree (though not to the degree that he thinks). Biedrins’s scoring efficiency might be a bit down due to the lack of Baron, but he’s still been good; Wright’s done well offensively, and so has Randolph for the last couple months.

I don’t really think Monta Ellis is a point guard, and I think it’d be good to get a purer point to back him up this summer. But I’m not altogether convinced that we need a point guard to execute on offense.

I’m not at all convinced that a healthy, properly-used (read: no smallball) version of this roster isn’t a .500 team. To me, that lineup looks more or less like a .500 team. It would require continued good production from Wright and Randolph, but the key word is “continued” — if they can simply keep up what they’ve been doing in their NBA careers, they’ll give us acceptable play at the position. It absolutely requires a healthy Monta, and that’s not a given, but his recent results have been pretty good. You bring up another key point — whether Jack will be content to be the third option (at best) on offense, as he probably should be. We’ll have to wait and see on that front.

One of the biggest variables, rarely touched upon, is whether this team can get a clue about winning road games. At Oracle, we’re 17-15 (oddly, better than all but three teams in the East), with a point differential that’s even more impressive. On the road, we’re as bad as any team in basketball. I don’t know if that’s youth, coaching, scheduling or what, but there’s no path to success that involves losing 80-90% of your road games.

I’m not saying Dubs fans should be satisfied with the roster above… I think it probably wouldn’t make the playoffs in the West most years. But some health and some bigger, Crawford-free lineups would do a hell of a lot for our prospects.

by onlxn on Mar 14, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

but we’ve actually had real streaks of offensive success without a point guard this season

Is that kind of like how Crawford has some real streaks of good shooting? I’m teasing, but while I’m still optimistic about Monta I’d say PG is still a big question mark for us.

 We don’t have anyone on this team that can consistently create for others without hurting us in other ways (shooting a low percentage, turning the ball over). CJ has actually done an admirable job considering the circumstances and the fact that he has never really been a true point. He’s not good enough to be a long term solution IMO though (not to mention his defense).

I don’t think Marco is a Point at all. He has shown some ability to create, but he’s basically the same player as Crawford on offense.

I’d like to see a good solid PG to play behind (and with) Monta. I’m feeling pretty good about our PF tandem. Center looks good. Maggs, Jackson, Buike and Morrow could be a reasonably good wing rotation.

I think we are still banking on improvement from the young guys for good things to happen for us. Although it’s still more likely that we are going to use one or two of them in a trade to get a real game-changer than any of them develop into one.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I generally agree. I don’t think Monta and Marco are point guards, and while I agree that CJ has done quite well considering, he’s not really an answer either.

On the other hand, our offense has been decent this season. I’m not talking about points per game, as that’s a function of pace… I’m talking about efficiency. Our field-goal percentage isn’t great, and considering our pace, we don’t record many assists. However, we score more on free throws per game than any other team (thanks, Corey), and shoot well from three… in points per shot and adjusted FG%, we rate a bit above average. It’s been a fairly effective NBA offense.

Now, you could argue that a Don Nelson team needs better than “fairly effective” offense to compete, and you’d be right. But replacing Crawford with Monta (I doubt Crawford leaves, but that’s the hypothetical we’re talking about) would do a lot for the offense. The gap in their scoring efficiencies is big… enough to make us a top-ten offense if we were able to make that switch. It probably wouldn’t be a significantly worse offense than the one we had in ‘07-’08, as the superior playmaking Baron gave us was largely negated by tons of bricked threes.

The biggest difference? Turnovers. We commit almost two more turnovers a game than we did last year, and that’s a meaningful difference… the main culprit, as you might imagine, is Jack. It may be that for this offense to run the way it’s been running, we have to live with Jack turning it over four times a game. It’s hard to survive that way, and I think Jack’s turnovers are the biggest question mark in our attempt to function without a pure point.

But I think we might be able to do it. It doesn’t sound right to me either, but we’ve been a credible offensive team without a point guard this year, to the point that I think a Monta/Jack backcourt is absolutely worth trying. It’d help to get our best players on the floor and to shore up our horrible defense and rebounding. Can they provide enough playmaking to get us by? Possibly not, but I’d like to see them get a shot at it.

by onlxn on Mar 14, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

couple things...

I pretty much agree. Only a couple points.

But replacing Crawford with Monta (I doubt Crawford leaves, but that’s the hypothetical we’re talking about) would do a lot for the offense. The gap in their scoring efficiencies is big… enough to make us a top-ten offense if we were able to make that switch.

I’m not sure that’s a given at this point. Monta still isn’t 100% but he’s looking better and better. My big question is what will his assists and turnovers will look like when he is the full time point guard. I hope he can pull it off but despite his efficient scoring I’m not sure if he can create opportunities for others consistently without turning it over at a high rate (see Jackson, Stephen). We’ll see. I’m cautiously optimistic.

It probably wouldn’t be a significantly worse offense than the one we had in ‘07-’08, as the superior playmaking Baron gave us was largely negated by tons of bricked threes.

I may be nitpicking here but I think largely might be an overstatement. It is hard to say but I think Baron had a pretty big positive impact despite his low shooting percentage.

we’ve been a credible offensive team without a point guard this year, to the point that I think a Monta/Jack backcourt is absolutely worth trying.

I agree with this. I’m not totally sold that it will be successful, but I think that is our best option at the moment. Monta definitely deserves a good look at the point. It’s one thing I’m really looking forward to watching the rest of the year.

Overall I think that in order to overcome our deficiencies (defense, rebounding…) we will probably have to be quite a bit better than average offensively. Then again, if Randolph continues to impress and shares time with Wright at PF rebounding and defense might not be as big of an issue either. There are still lots of question marks out there.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Baron had a pretty big positive impact despite his low shooting percentage.

No, I agree — obviously Baron was a huge plus. I was referring to the team’s overall three-point shooting, which wasn’t very good… Barnes also shot quite poorly from three, and nobody shot particularly well. Al’s .375 mark led the team. We have four guys doing better than that this year.

Overall I think that in order to overcome our deficiencies (defense, rebounding…) we will probably have to be quite a bit better than average offensively. Then again, if Randolph continues to impress and shares time with Wright at PF rebounding and defense might not be as big of an issue either. There are still lots of question marks out there.

Yep. It’s a weird and flawed roster, but there’s some upside here. The next six weeks should be interesting.

by onlxn on Mar 15, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

team’s overall three-point shooting

Gotcha. I agree completely.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 15, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We won't really know without Biedrins

Not having him is a pretty big loss in terms of rebounding/defense. Hopefully Randolph/Turaif/Wright can get it done… It’ll be interesting to continue to project what this team could do next year, especially with a real chance of getting lucky in the lottery.

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0

by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 16, 2009 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

but monta is most likely going to be 20 ppg or more next year an same with jak an didnt baron shoot us out of some games.that just comes with having out type offense

by nateoak10 on Mar 14, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Crawford opts out.

I’ve been trying to figure out under what set of circumstances Crawford would opt-out under and I can’t think of any.

In a time where teams are cost cutting and the salary cap may actually decrease, is anyone going to pay $9 mil per year for a streaky, volume-shooter?

A comparable player, Ricky Davis, based on his work through the 07-08 season signed a 2-year $5mil contract. He’s only 1 year older than Crawford and shoots better form the field by like 5%.

This year, Davis has gone down the toilet but he got his contract prior to that and you have to adjust for the fact that he’s been playing in a living hell. Regardless, I think Crawford is more overpaid than people realize. I like him, but not objectively. He seems like of a cool guy (based on his fan chat and news coverage) and his crossover is ridiculous, but he isn’t all that productive for what he’s paid.

I’d be interested to see what the Warriors could get for him in trade because, his agent will have to find some really stupid team to use that much cap space on him. He almost has to stay put.

Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.

by bloodsweatndonuts on Mar 14, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BSD

I wrote up a reply when I was at work but forgot to hit post I guess. Basically I said that I agree with pretty much everything you wrote. I don’t really expect Crawford to opt out, just like I didn’t expect Baron to opt out. It was more of an off the cuff prediction than anything. I think that Crawford does have some trade value seeing as he is a high scoring, entertaining player that can excite a crowd. He won’t help your team win games but I think we’ll probably find a taker if we look to deal him. We won’t get anything stellar in return but hopefully we can find a somewhat productive player that fits in better with the team.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seems like as good a place/time as any

To trot out the ol’ twist on the tony.psd classic…

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 14, 2009 2:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL... old school!

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 14, 2009 7:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha...

i never seen this one before

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

… says the man with the “finger” webpin … XD

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 14, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

i guess it’s time to switch pics now! right on freud!

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aw shucks.

I feel bad that the “important part” is getting cut off in your webpin, tho’. Here’s a square one (400×400 px) that should work better for you…

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 15, 2009 6:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha...

yeah…that sucks that it does that…thanks again sleepy!

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 15, 2009 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do love the front pic you chose Yao Butta...

Jackson is all hype but Buike looks like he’s doing the salsa!

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 14, 2009 8:02 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

haha

I thought the same thing.

by disguy on Mar 14, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Progress

Remember when we complained that AR never slapped our FT shooters after a ft? Well tonight he was slapping each time. And he was helping beans off the court.

And no one mentions that awesome dance on the floor after tipping in that shot? Raw emotions are fun.

We won a game without beans (warrior curse!) and with our backup center still hurt.

So after last game, where monta did not play in the 4th and jamal played pg, this game jamal was out most of the 4th and nellie stuck with monta and buike (whose husstle plays and 3pt shooting helped seal the deal). We saw taller, more defense oriented nellie ball.

Jamal – wish he would get to the rim more often rather than settle for jump shots. Buike was doing his maggs impersonation and getting to the line with several and-ones.

I wonder if nellie really wanted this win (he hates Cuban), since he didn’t play marco/cj.

And morrow got to play the 4th qtr again, interesting choice. Sadley he had an off shooting night

by mosdl on Mar 14, 2009 8:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

proper nellie ball is based on good D

creating turnovers, getting in passing lanes, and RUNNING. you cant run if they keep scoring lol. Nellie wants the backcourt to be monta/jack…. and if he could, would get a long athletic 3 to play alongside wright and randolph. Dont know who that will be.

by tafkasam on Mar 14, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

long, athletic...

remind you of someone?

by ZaMzAm FiRe on Mar 14, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

POB right? :)

I’d say Maggs might fit the 3 (minus length) requirements – he draws charges and rebounds decently.

Or get lamar odom somehow!

by mosdl on Mar 14, 2009 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was fine with BW

only playing 15 minutes. He’s been gone for 27 games. He doesn’t need to be playing so much in his first game back.

by disguy on Mar 14, 2009 10:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

when AR fouled out...

were any of yall shaking your head at Nellie’s decision to go small again…with Jack at the center spot? I was like “awww shiiiett…here comes our demise” but they played through it. I woulda preferred Wright to sub in and continue to play a taller lineup but i aint complaining because it worked….this time.

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep...

I thought the same thing at the time. I’m glad they pulled it off but I was thinking that Wright would have been a better choice to bridge the gap until Ronny came back in.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha

i guess i didnt consider that. especially with the game hanging on the line…who knows how good he could have played. he might have folded or he might have kept us afloat and still won the game. who knows? but i still think i would have probably put him in instead of going super small again.

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he's such a sissy,

maybe you should try to fight him or something and teach him how to man up. We can all see how big of a man you are on the internet.

by ZaMzAm FiRe on Mar 14, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe you should try to fight him or something and teach him how to man up

  Bad idea ! Thizz ’d just rip off his wing and back on the DL for wright.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 14, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jack played great last nighit...

but i’m pretty pissed at him for being so stupid by running into Randolph’s shoulder right when he obviously hurt it. Wow that was stupid.

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As a Mavs fan

I love this young GS squad..

It’s too bad about Beans but RT really stepped up.. Keep your head up Warrior fans

by JayKim41 on Mar 14, 2009 11:04 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

thank you

you do the same thing.

Kelenna is mine...;>

by girltothemax on Mar 14, 2009 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

right on man

Yeah…Turiaf was amazing last night. it’s great to have a guy like him on our team

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

From Marcus Thompson
  • By the way, Randolph acknowledged getting banged on by Jason Terry (as if he could deny it). He certainly lit a fire under him.
    Randolph: "I take anytime someone dunks on me personal."

by IQofaWarrior on Mar 14, 2009 12:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Did you notice...

that Terry pushed off with his foot on Randolph’s thigh? When I saw it live I thought “No way. How did he get up like that.” Then they play the replay and sure enough, he put his foot into Randolph and climbed a few more inches.

Randolph shouldn’t feel too bad. He gave him a boost so he should take some credit for the dunk. =P

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GstQDccguo

Watch his feet and look at how he gets up a little higher when he pushes off.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 14, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh damn

good eye. I was wondering how the hell he was able to hang in the air for so long. That explains everything.

by disguy on Mar 14, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

yea…he climbed the ladder to dunk on AR…it wasn’t all him

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

monta obama?

is it just me or does Monta look like a young Barack Obama?

by tongnar on Mar 14, 2009 12:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i was watching the highlights on NBA.com, and the lady announcer kept sayin Mont-uh ellis

even our “superstar” doesnt have enough recognition to have his name pronounced right
(but she did get Kelenna azubuike right…)

by 123707THIZZ on Mar 14, 2009 1:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought..

the warrior wonder shoulda went to Monta Ellis. I think he played extremely well and his numbers showed it. Not to mention, with all the Monta hating going on, I think he deserved a nice pat on the back for just coming out and playing basketball. For me, it’s no question, that we need this guy on our team. The WW coulda went to hella different guys last night. Turiaf, Jack, AR, BW, Monta and even Crawford just for not shooting us out of this game haha. He let the other guys, who were obviously hot, do their thing. LGW!

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 14, 2009 1:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Should try it

but marco hasn’t been the same player with the same confidence he had prior to injury.

by Lincoln Logs on Mar 14, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

for a crappy team

we sure are on ESPN a lot.

o well.. time to get embarrassed!Q

by saintdee on Mar 14, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know, at least at home we have a chance....

to bad they wont have Porter or Amare to let Azu rain down threes again

by 123707THIZZ on Mar 14, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

azubuike had 7 rebounds, not 4.

talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish

by starry night on Mar 14, 2009 8:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Matt Steinmetz reports Warriors sign Chris Hunter from D-League
Small
The Thing About Randolph...
76968623_small
Very realistic Monta Ellis trade
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
Stack Jax for Radman: The Numbers
Small
Thank You, Jack

Recent FanPosts

Act_marco_belinelli_small
Was Jackson holding Monta back from his full potential?
Follett_small
Monta Ellis and the Warriors Frustrated Brandon Roy and the Trail Blazers
Small
Time Will Tell (and Curry > Jennings)
Dscn0324_small
The TK Challenge
Follett_small
Further Cap Relief for the Warriors, But the Bottom Line is Who Cares?
Small
The Inevitable Trade of Ellis... Proposal
Small
Monta Trade that Makes Sense

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae