RECAP: Warriors 106, Lakers 114 - Just Not Enough
It was a close game but just not quite enough defense to get the W. Sound familiar? The Lake Show shot 50% from the field and 50% from 3. The Lakers put the game away at the start of the 3rd when they tore off an 11-0 run to push a 1 point halftime lead to a 12 point, good night Warriors, lead. From there, the Warriors fought back but were playing from behind the rest of the night. Even though the Warriors cut the lead to 3 with under 3 minutes to go, it just didn't have the feel of a Warrior win. The Lakers seem to do that to the Warriors. They let the Warriors get close enough but not all the way. It's like seeing how far you can go without hitting that breaking point. I have to admit though, it keeps these Warriors-Lakers games very interesting.
There's already so much to be negative about, I'm not too excited at the prospect of ripping the Warriors or telling you all about how bad this team is. Instead, let's look at some of the positives.

Ronny, smell my hand
Brandan "My Shoulder is Fine" Wright
He finally got some real PT. I’m sure it helped that AR got hurt, but the starting nod and 33 minutes is an encouraging sign. Double double, 11 and 10. Throw in the 4 assists and BW (does his middle name start with an M?), put together one of his better pro games, against the top team in the West too.
Corey "I’m the PG" Maggette
Wow, move over Monta, here’s out PG of the future. 7 assists? From Corey Maggette in one game? Heck he had 7 assists in 22 minutes! I didn’t even know he knew how to pass the ball. All he seemed to know was catch, dribble, get the ref to call a foul so I can shoot some free throws. The 7 assists are astonishing. I’m speechless. Is he turning over a new leaf? Auditioning for PG spot in 2009-2010? Or was this just a fluke because he couldn't score much tonight.
Kelenna "Lights Out" Azubuike
This guy and Ronny Turiaf were two excellent additions to this Warriors team this offseason. Money well spent. Tonight he had 25 points, 8 rebounds, and shot the lights out. I wonder how his offseason will be. Is he going to get better or has he hit his ceiling? His defense could improve but offensively, he's been quite efficient is someone you can count on.
Stephen "Lights Off" Jackson
My mama always said, "if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all." I’ll leave it at that Mr. 5-17 and 4 turnovers.
Monta "I’m Back" Ellis
Whatever he had to eat back home in Mississippi with his mama is what everyone on the team needs to eat. Tonight he continued to play and shoot well. 27 points on 19 shots along with 5 assists makes it look like he can be that scoring point guard that Nellie wants him to be.
Playing tough without 3 key players
No Andris, no Jamal, and no AR against the top team in the West, and some would say the league. With 3 minutes to go, the Warriors nearly won the game. It's possible that the score doesn't change with those 3 guys but I'd like to think that they have a positive impact on the game. So, all in all, it's not a bad loss. Not bad at all. Just a little closer to a higher draft pick.


72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
HOORAY
Kelenna for the WW!
Hey it’s all gravy. W’s gave the Lakers a run for their money. Made it hella close at the end.
I love Kelenna David Azubuike! <333
by goldenstatelove on Mar 19, 2009 11:36 PM PDT reply actions
hello! thanks! i'll be repping my kelenna love for you and girltothemax (:
I love Kelenna David Azubuike! <333
by goldenstatelove on Mar 20, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Can we trade eyes for tonight??? Please???
lol
Kelenna is mine...;>
by girltothemax on Mar 20, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Home Court Refs
i usually don’t gripe about the refs, but HOW MANY times did they blow out of bounds calls ( i counted 3) and let the Lakers MAUL either Jack or Maggs in the paint then and the next possession call a ticky tack on the W’s against Lamar or Pau hitting the rim at full tilt. About 5 times.
But no…nobody can comment about the ref’s because Donaghy proved the games are not fixed – oh wait he did fix games.
And the league isn’t pushing hard for a Cleveland/LA finals – Kobe v Lebron – oh wait…they are.
whatareyougonnado
The game was lost twice
Once in the third when the Lakers came out aggressively and caused us to play terribly until we were down 18. The second time was in the 4th when we were had ALMOST fought back to tie the game, and Buike took what looked like a rushed three, which missed and led to a Laker score so we were down 5. That killed our momentum during that 16-4 run and allowed the Lakers to recover, letting them off the hook.
I thought JD had some nice minutes with a couple of shots and a cleanup dunk. I didn’t catch it it live, but some people posted saying that JD had trouble getting rebounds. In any case, JD has made enough of an impact on me to believe in him as a 3rd backup guy.
Jack’s bad offensive night didn’t help us, though he played pretty good defense on Kobe. Um, except for that flop Jack tried to take. That’s a moment when you hope the photographers are taking photos of Kobe driving, and not of you falling backwards on your butt.
BWright got a double double! I didn’t notice BWright getting that many rebounds, probably because he got 7 rebounds in that first qtr. Um, yeah, the qtr that got wiped out because of the Cavs-Blazers OT. Thanks LeBron for NOT FINISHING THE GAME ON TIME!!! But I did hear Jim praising BWright on the radio side about BWright being all over the glass.
I did see one moment of concern for BWright, and that was when Trevor Ariza was under the basket, and Wright was there, and Wright ran up to Ariza’s SIDE, instead of Ariza’s FRONT. That opened the lane for Trevor to run by Wright for a reverse jam. On the timeout, I saw Nellie yelling at Wright about it. I thought Wright would be gone from the game after that, but without AR, I guess Nellie had no choice but to put Wright back later in the game.
Well, we gave the Lakers a scare. Plus it piles on to the issues they recently had about their “mental toughness”, or “killer instinct”. It’s always good to hear about problems in Lakerland.
Yup, not bad. Definitely one of those nights where I was loving the kids and hating the vets — Jack and Maggs bitching to the refs gets really, really old sometimes. Conversely, you had another pretty good Monta game, a stellar performance from ‘Buike, and a sloppy but fairly productive 33 minutes from Wright. (He’s given many better performances — the numbers just seem more impressive when he plays more. Tonight was actually the worst shooting performance of his NBA career.)
Some real ugly stretches here and there, but overall this was one of our better road efforts of the season. In some ways the most important remaining games are the ones on the road… we already know we can hang with teams in Oracle. We didn’t get a win tonight, but we showed some fire. I’ll take that.
Maggette and Jackson
While both of these guys make huge contributions at times, their turnovers are absolutely atrocious, and tonight was a good example.
Despite getting 7 assists tonight, Maggette has proven to be an absolutely horrible passer. Throwing it cross-court twice way above the head of his teammate when he was getting double teamed… what a complete joke.
And good ’ol Clumsy Jack, getting stripped repeatedly because he thinks he is a good ball handler.
Another thing I noticed was Jermareo Davidson giving the Lakers two extra possession on two different occassions, both presumably because he wanted to up his rebound total. One time, the ball was headed for Monta below him after a missed shot, but he stuck his hands out and knocked it out of bounds. The second time, Kobe missed a shot and instead of blocking out Odom I think it was and letting it go out of bounds (which he easily could have done) he lunges for it and once again sends it out.
by randolphforpresident on Mar 20, 2009 1:09 AM PDT reply actions
Jermareo Davidson giving the Lakers two extra possession on two different occassions
Those things happen when you play hard, it’s not always possible to see all the other guys in the area so you gotta go for anything you can reach. Barnes did something like that in 2007 and everyone was calling him crap but his hustle also won us a lot of games later.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions
did you see maggs turn overs?
wow those were UGLY
we NEED to get rid of maggs + crawford + watson (yes watson is decent but we have a logjam at the 1/2 and id rather have bellineli/morrow/jackson/ellis at the 1 and 2 and even draft a point!! so we need to lose crawford and watson)
i like our future, if we get a good PG draft pick…even tho ellis can be a scoring point…id prefer him to be a SG that has point guard skills…with a real PG running the show!
PG: <insert name here (curry/rubio/harden/holiday)>, bellineli
SG: ellis, morrow
SF: jackson, buki
PF: randolph, wright
C: andris, turiaf, davidson
looks like an excellent future imo…(depending on the point of course)…and toss in whoever u can get from maggs+crawford being gone
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
did you typed "watson is decent"
LostHawk, you’re becoming quite like the Warriors boys…full of surprises.
Maggette's not the problem...
even though he does play dumb sometimes. He plays hard every night and really contributes on the offensive end and on the boards.
As for Crawford, the writing’s on the wall and he’s on the way out. Nice guy, bad fit.
Watson is fine as a third PG or a quick bit of energy off the bench. He can spell Monta b/c they’re too small and bad at defense to play together. If he plays more than 10-15 minutes a night, though, we’re in trouble. When his shot’s not on, like it hasn’t been the past few weeks, he has no value whatsoever. He’s not a bad player, though.
NO
maggette is terrible for our team and play style
offensively he only pads his own stats with just points…his ‘assists’ come with TONS of turn overs, far wose than anyone on the team. defensively he just tries to flop every time he can, hes very bad defensively for a forward.
the big problem i have with his offensive game, for a SF he is VERY half court oriented in the sense that when he gets the ball…and ISO is set up…and he drives and just tries to draw a foul. this does not help all our other offensive threats get into the game (which helps them offensively and defensively, since a good offensive possession for a player can help fuel them on the defense)
basically maggette is a very bad fit for our team and is not useful in any way for our future. crawford, as much as i like the player and his game…he has to go as well
our future is in randolph/wright/ellis/andris/marco/turiaf…primarily in randolph/ellis/andris…we need to build a team around those players…and magg/crawford really cannot fit that mold well.
and paying a guy as much as hes getting paid just to score points off the bench is insane, especially when we are having major flaws at the starting position of PG.
we NEED to get rid of maggs/crawford during the offseason
we NEED to draft a PG with tons of potential to build with our core team
we NEED to BELIEVE in our FUTURE!
i know I BELIEVE
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
Corey?
I don’t know exactly how Corey used to play. (on other team) If I recalled correctly, he used to hog the ball so much… But, now he’s passing. Credit him that. Besides, it’s not like Monta is any better with the ball handling… Frankly speaking, the team isn’t that great at ball passing… But they’re improving…
passing?
passing to the other team u mean
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
lol
dear. 7 dimes must count for something. that’s the total of 2 games from our future PG Monta. But we gotta see how he does tonight.
BTW, out of curiosity, are you a female?
ya hes decent
and for me, him being decent means hes a good trading chip! we dont need another 1.5 gaurd!
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
It doesn't look like Brandan Wright has a middle name or initial
so no BMW nickname for him.
lmfaoooo
wow. i thought that was really funny bro.
Maybe i should go to sleep now ?
Romes Mac Mojous
by ROMESdavidWOOD37 on Mar 20, 2009 3:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Hmm, BKW
that sounds like a Burger King name.
by IQofaWarrior on Mar 20, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Who was shutting down Kobe?
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 20, 2009 6:30 AM PDT reply actions
Mostly Jack
Despite an awful game on the offensive end, he gets at worst a C for the job he did on Kobe…
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on Mar 20, 2009 6:45 AM PDT up reply actions
So not only do the pundits and $$$ don't come for defensive efforts
You also get zero love from your own fans when you shut down one of the top 2 players in the NBA. Great!
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 20, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions
he gets at worst a C for the job he did on Kobe…
I’d give him an A for keeping Kobe under 40 points, Kobe almost looked like he was feeling sorry for Jax so gave him a break?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Jack did play great D
When he’s motivated, which is usually the case if the team’s any good (unlike all of this year) or it’s a big game, he’s one of the best wing defenders in the NBA. If you don’t appreciate what he did on defense then you don’t appreciate defense in general. The Warriors’ biggest problem is he seems to be the only one who consistently plays defense, along with Buke, Turiaf and maybe Randolph. (Morrow looks like he’s quickly becoming a much better defender, the Ariza 3 at the end of the game not withstanding.)
thanks for the good vibes...i won 300 last night
and no i am not your ankol..or tito hahaha
my code name is "kelenna bahongpuki"
by VonteegoCummings on Mar 20, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions
.i won 300 last night
Now maybe maxigirl will go out with you?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions
=0
what’s that supposed to mean?? lol
Kelenna is mine...;>
by girltothemax on Mar 20, 2009 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sayin she's a golddigger :>)
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 21, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
How bout kuya or manong?!
Brandon Jennings or Ty Lawson. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Andre Smith in Silver & Black in 2009.
kuya perhaps
Manong is for ilokanos…which I’m not lol
my code name is "kelenna bahongpuki"
by VonteegoCummings on Mar 20, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions
haha i call my older cousins/peers manong still
And alot of em are Tagalog.
So you can have both =P
Brandon Jennings or Ty Lawson. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Andre Smith in Silver & Black in 2009.
haha awesome
Now you can buy all of us here in GSoM some dinner for tonight!
Kelenna is mine...;>
by girltothemax on Mar 20, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Ball Handling
We need a really good ball handler next year. No surprise there.
What is interesting was they had more turnovers, and we only got rebounded by 8. We had more steals and equal assists.
They shot better.
I am scared of next season – 9 winning teams in the west, plus us/clips/thunder will probably play better next year. West is going to be murder.
Clips won't be much better
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 20, 2009 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Nobody in this year's draft is going to help immediately
Blake Griffen? Not going to be much better than Kaman/Randolph/Camby next year. In the future, sure, but not next year.
No PG is going to be better than Baron, no SG or SF is going to be immediately be better than Gordon or Thornton. So, you’re expecting an old team to get one year older, add a bench rookie, and get a lot better? No. They probably won’t be 13-69, but there’s no way they come close to the playoffs unless there’s a complete roster overhaul, including Dunleavy.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 20, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Never said playoffs for them
The west could have 12 “good” teams in theory assuming no team is majorly injured. I’d say the playoffs next year may be settled by who isn’t injured.
Well...
The other 11 will be challenging for 8 playoff spots. If you’re grouped with 14 other teams and 11 of the other teams are better than you and only 3 are worse, you’re not a “good team.”
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 20, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I got annoyed
The Cavs and Blazers went into Overtime, so we missed like the whole first quarter. This game could have been tied at 102, but instead it was the Lakers 105-102. That 3 points that the referees just gave Famar in the 1st half was crucial. It’s that play where Farmar pump faked, then Maggette made sure not to land on him. Then in Typical Warriors/Lakers fashion, Farmer put up a bunny-hop, scored, and converted a free throw.
Eff the Cavs for not finishing earlier...
I hate TNT-only games for the Dubs, especially when the first game goes into OT because somehow LeBron can beat us at the buzzer on the road but not at home.
by Scooter Ellis on Mar 20, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
How is that three points?
Farmar made the shot and the refs called a questionable “and one” on Maggs. Yeah, Maggs barely grazed him, but he kinda deserved the whistle just for being so throughly faked out of his boots. Either way, the FT is one additional point, not three.
And that’s ignoring the inherent absurdity of pointing to that one call as the difference, as opposed to any of the other 15 zillion discrete events that might have swung the game three points in one direction or another.
The Lakers won fair and square. They’re a much better than team we are.
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on Mar 20, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Nope
Maggette didn’t touch him. Okay fine if no foul, we would have been down by 2. Still, we wouldn’t have needed a 3 pointer to tie.
Haha.
Well, ten, all things being equal, we would have ended up losing by seven instead of eight, right? Yay.
No, no, let me guess: in your fantasy alternate universe, that one point would prevented Kelenna from pulling up for that ill-advised three … right? Instead, he would have taken it strong to the rack and dunked it Kobe’s grill, tying the game. Not only that, in the wake of the dunk, Kobe would have fallen to the floor funny and blown out his ACL, MCL and kneecap, effectively ending his career and sending the Lakers into a tailspin from which they would never recover.
Meanwhile, your joy at the sight of Kobe writhing on the floor in agony would have been so intense that after the game, instead of staying at home blogging, you would have gone out and celebrated, met the girl of your dreams, bought a lotto ticket and hit all six numbers plus the powerball. With the winnings, after buying the coolest house, car, and xbox in your neighborhood, you would have invested in writing, math, and logic classes, which would have enabled you to become the coolest, most beloved and most popular poster on GSoM.
Am I warm…?
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on Mar 20, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Positives that I can take..........
from the game is that we played really sloppy and was able to compete. The whole game I thought we played out of sync expecially that 3rd turnover prone qtr.
Here are some more POSITIVES cuz what’s the point of negativity?
Monta Ellis – his mid-range jumper is back. once his explosiveniess to the basket is 100%, how can u defend that guy? Altho he isn’t a true PG, i feel just so much more comfy when he handles the rock as oppose to those one-on-one play we see started by jax and maggete. Please don’t leave next year Monta!
Bukie – he is a legit 3pt threat! is it me or are nelly and them clueless? sasha killed us with his 3s, and he got them cuz of ball movement and penetration. why can’t the warriors seem to do this for the likes of bukie and morrow. when we were coming back in the 4th, maggs penetrated and dished to bukie twice. the result…..a 3ptr. why can’t we seem to do this more with our offensive weapons??
those are the only 2 positives i could find in last nite’s game. wait….that’s a positve in itself cuz only monta and bukie had good games and we still competed.
what’s the point of negativity? :)
Were the Dubs really playing to win?
I thought in the final 3 minutes when we had a chance to win the game there was a severe lack of coaching. This is not meant to give Nelliehater a chance to go off – holster those guns cowboy – just questioning why Nellie does not take the opportunity to coach in game instead of jsut seeing what happens.
There were some bad decision made on the floor
-rushed shots
-no drive and kick when the opportunity was present
-lack of ball movement
The Warriors had good chance to learn something and gel as a team who should be much improved next year. I feel like those chances are wasted sometimes, but maybe Nellie discusses this stuff with film the next day or whatever.
indeed
Need to go back to ball movement. Marco/cj need to handle the ball more and try to facilitate the offense. I really think Nellie needs to have marco especially work on ball handling and try to have him/morrow play the 1/2 together as the 2nd unit.
Like I've said, I predicted a win until I read "Warriors by 1."
Now, let’s beat the 76ers! (please stop posting Warriors by 1!!!)
(please stop posting Warriors by 1!!!)
Who’s writing the open thread? No warriors by 1 ok? Don’t make me hafta come over there now.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 10:17 AM PDT reply actions
Ummmmmmm....
Nellie doesn’t really want Monta to be a scoeing point guard. He kinda wants him to be a facilitator but Nellie is willing to work with him the time being.
Monta's Back!
He wasn’t himself, obviously, in the first batch of games when he returned but now he’s the Monta that the Warriors gave $60+ million to.
He’ll never be a pass first point guard and I think it’ll be a while before he even register 10 assists in a game, so it is best for Crawford to either opt out or be traded and bring in a true PG while moving Jackson to the 3, Wright/Randolph at the 4 and Biedrins at 5.
As for Maggette, keep him at his 6th man spot because the guy can just score period and his defense isn’t too bad that the Warriors should consider trading him after only 1 year into his contract.
The Warriors have a solid bench with Azubuike, Turiaf and Morrow so one main acquisition this off-season I would love to see is sign J-Kidd to a 2 year contract with the money saved from Crawford leaving.
Boom, roasted.
Word
Great post, probably b/c I agree with everything said. J-Kidd would be an awesome addition to the W’s b/c while he isn’t special any more in the half-court he’s still a joy to watch in transition, the Warriors’ specialty. Being a Cal / Oakland guy, he may be enticed by finishing his career it started and where he grew up. If we could sign him and draft or sign a young project PG he could learn from one of the best PGs in the history of the game.
I would have liked this a few years ago
But Kidd’s too old for the way we play now. Plus, he’s just about at the end almost. I’m sure he’ll want to go play for a contender.
he may be enticed by finishing his career it started and where he grew up. If we could sign him and draft or sign a young project PG he could learn from one of the best PGs in the history of the game.
You know, I kinda like that idea? Might be nice to have a vet point play a few critical minutes per game, but would Nellie use him correctly?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
The NBA/TNT/Refs couldn't let it happen
There were numerous times when blown calls killed our momentum, but I can pinpoint it to one moment that really did it. When this happened I turned to my friends and said if we lose this is why.
We were on a 12-0 run and had cut the lead to six when Sasha Vujacic turned the ball over trying to inbounds it by walking along the baseline. Unfortunately the ref did not/chose not to see that and what should have been Warriors ball became a three pointer for the Lakers.
I hate to try to blame the refs for a loss because our players certainly did a lot of things to allow this game to get away… but it really seems like every time we play the Lakers it’s not just them that we have to overcome. Remember last year when Monta “fouled” Derek Fisher in overtime by being pulled to the ground by him?
We were on a 12-0 run and had cut the lead to six when Sasha Vujacic turned the ball over trying to inbounds it by walking along the baseline.
I didn’t see the play, but if we literally had just cut it to 6 on a made basket, the inbounder is definitely allowed to walk the baseline (or run, or skip). He’s just still gotta inbound the ball within 5 seconds. Perfectly legal. Now, if we’d airballed a shot or turned it over, then you’ve got a gripe.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 20, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I think he’s talking about the inbounds where Sasha changed his pivot foot, and you’re not allowed to do that unless it’s a made basket. The TNT commentators talked about that, saying the ref standing right behind Sasha didn’t see it because he wasn’t looking down at Sasha’s feet. It SHOULD have been a turnover, but I understand why the ref missed it.
by IQofaWarrior on Mar 20, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions
The announcers aren't standing right next to Sasha
where looking at Sasha’s feet means NOT looking on the floor
by IQofaWarrior on Mar 20, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions
where looking at Sasha’s feet means NOT looking on the floor
Yeah, if he makes any meaningful movement the ref will catch it anyway, if his shoulders don’t move more than his pivot reach then who cares?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions
:)
Love you too
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 23, 2009 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Remember last year when Monta "fouled" Derek Fisher in overtime by being pulled to the ground by him?
Montay thought Fish was a moped and tried to cop a ride?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 20, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
























