Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

geez guys, let's keep it together.

yikes. its always gonna kill me that dudes can make seriously obscene amounts of money and have approximately 4 oz of character. i'm speaking about monta. i am hugely disappointed if the rumors are true. i have to side with other posters here who may have used the term "prima donna" to describe him. he's got a sweet deal for someone who got badly injured, lied about it, and has yet to demonstrate that he can even return to that playing form.

that been said, i don't think he should go. i would like to see him be a professional, step up and assume the leadership position, and play good team basketball. doesn't it seem so simple? i'm not gonna hold my breath cuz this is the golden state of "unhappy stars who bail for other teams and wind up having a wonderful career". come to think of it i suppose this situation does fit the template.

i hope the warrior organization isn't strong-arming crawford into opting out. that is not the way to welcome a contributing team member. it's not hard to tell a grown man that the future financials probably will not pan out and that other options may need to be explored in an environment of working together. i can dig if people are stressed out with a horrible losing season and pissed fans. but when aren't the fans pissed and when do they not show up to oracle even to watch some scrubbs (who always seem to have an excellent chance of beating us)?

jamal is a good dude. good dudes with character tend to have longer careers and make more of a contribution on and off the court. Grant Hill? Derek Fisher? Shane Battier? these dudes are always gonna have a job either as a player, coach, assistant, executive, sportscaster, etc. because they are solid and people like them. bad attitudes, no matter how much talent, always seem to be expendable. Ron Artest. Starbury. Zach Randolph. if GS can't afford jamal's price tag that's one thing. don't treat him like a punk though...

as for the rest of the team? the only guy that i'm itching to unload is marcus williams only because I get more playing time than he does. if these dudes could simply be more competitive in the areas that don't require any real talent - defense, rebounding, moving the ball and moving without it - then they could have at least a couple of winning seasons. the things that prevent the warriors from winning more is lack of focus and effort. clearly, no other team has the combination of awesome firepower the warriors have. this isn't even a contest. but they beat themselves twice as much as any other team does by not positioning themselves to unload that firepower.

taking the team apart to rebuild will yield little to nothing in the near term. we do this like every four years. when the going gets tough, the tough get tougher. the warriors have enough personnel to play good, competitive basketball. but do they have the wisdom to realize that and the heart to keep it together? i am hopeful, but have my reservations.

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

Comment 129 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

AWESOME POST

As you can see, all the Monta supporters have their period over me and act like I’m disrespecting Jesus. I don’t think I’ve seen any who just say their opinion and leave it at that lol. We all have our way of bringing out what we think, but you made some excellent points. I don’t like how Monta just doesn’t take responsibility. Lots of his supporters are just too mesmerized by his skills. Skills and good attitudes/team players go hand-in-hand.

by Golden Boy on Mar 8, 2009 12:25 PM PDT reply actions  

except

this person says he wants monta to stay. you said you want monta to leave and crawford to stay.

by saintdee on Mar 8, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

How sad

Look at you trying to instigate.

by Golden Boy on Mar 8, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

no

you are.

read what you wrote

As you can see, all the Monta supporters have their period over me and act like I’m disrespecting Jesus. I

by saintdee on Mar 8, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow, making a signature on me.

I’m honored to be your hero. I would never make a signature off of you. Personally, I don’t think you’re worth it.

by Golden Boy on Mar 8, 2009 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

it’s called italic, it’s not his signature …

by hardcore on Mar 8, 2009 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

no, no it's not

he was quoting you. get over yourself

by Calamity on Mar 8, 2009 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah, well...

That’s just your opinion. Golden Showers Boy’s opinion is that it was his signature.

My opinion is that the earth is flat. So all you round-earth-loving haters can go frak yourselves.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 8, 2009 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

what do u expect?

monta is barely a high school educated kid with prob the same level of character. if you were super rich and a NBA player when u were in high school (obv hes not IN highschool but he does have the metal capacity and social capacity) wouldnt u be pretty cocky?? cmon admit it.

he’ll grow up and if he leaves the team, u’ll be sorry

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Mar 8, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

i expect a grown man with $63mil coming his way.

this ain’t summer break. this ain’t ya boys’ house party. this is a professional sport that rewards contribution.

i might be cocky if i wasn’t even legal to drink and i was already the most improved player. but i think the cliche “easy come, easy go” applies here. monta is raw when healthy, no discussion necessary. my point is that a player with average ability and outstanding character (hopefully high basketball IQ too) will do more for a team than a player with awesome ability who is a complete duchebag. Shawn Marion? Steve Francis?

but it don’t have to be like this for monta. if he just focuses on getting healthy and putting up numbers and let the rest take care of itself – its gonna work out for everybody all around.

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

good post but

i have to disagree with things that “dont require real talent.” i would argue that millsap has just as much talent as amare. just because millsap’s talent is below the rim rebounding and amare is freakish atleticism doesnt make amare a better player in my opinion. We do need to just tweak this team with one or two moves to make this a playoff team. we have all ready rebuilded and just need one of our high paid perimeter player to be gone, or bring a player of need in return.

by IndubitableBayAreaGM on Mar 8, 2009 12:53 PM PDT reply actions  

and...

different players have different skills sets based largely on their athletic abilities and god given talents.

i consider both amare and paul wonderful, wonderful big men. i might give the edge to paul because of demonstrated work ethic (a function of character, btw) but that can’t take away from the miles of highlight reel amare has managed to manufacture.

when i talk about real talent it is this:

ben wallace has some severely obscene athletic ability. he has very little actual talent. he can barely shoot the ball to save his life and has been in the league for like 12 years. he is not marketable for his talents. he still has a job because he’s barely 6’9" but because of his athleticism and basketball IQ he can contend and defend some of the very best offenders. he’s also a cool dude with a very humble history that he doesn’t forget.

jj reddick isn’t even a factor in the nba. he’s a legendary college player. i have the better basketball shooting video and i love it. he has freakish shooting talent, almost zero athletic ability. he has not and will not make a real impact in this league unless its a clutch three or free throws. not to say he won’t have a long career (look at steve kerr), but just to show the contrast between actual talent and sheer athletic ability.

and to recap – defense, rebounding, moving the ball and moving without it are activities that don’t require any real talent except awareness and determination. things that you’d think would be prerequisites but are dying arts in today’s game

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

+100!!

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Mar 8, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

OK

At the same time, that doesn’t mean their behavior wasn’t bad. Furthermore, that certainly doesn’t mean the organization should pacify a young man who is clearly in the wrong. If so, they encourage MORE wrong behavior.

by Naticus on Mar 8, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

"attitude problems"
Kobe and Shaq bickered their way to 3 titles. Now Kobe is leading his team to another, after being a huge locker room cancer just 2 summers ago.

Shaq and Kobe’s immense talent overcame their bickering 3 times, but the bickering cost them a great shot at building a dynasty.

MJ wasn’t a great teammate.

depends what you mean by “great teammate.” If you mean “being nice to everyone all the time” then no he wasnt a great teammate. If you mean “knew how to push his teammates buttons and push them to get maximum production out of their talent while not pushing them to the point that it ruined team chemistry” then he was a GREAT teammate.

Sheed was a guy with attitude problems before (and after) Detroit.

But there were at least 3 other strong personalities that kept Sheed in check during their most successful run, once Larry Brown, Ben Wallace and now Chauncey and Sheed had a bigger and bigger role as a leader on that team the team got worse and worse. coincidence?

Stephen Jackson was considered a bad guy in ’07

a bad guy maybe….but no one has ever called him a bad teammate, in fact almost everyone who has played with him say he is one of the best theyve ever played with.

Thing A

by sam23 on Mar 8, 2009 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

eh, maybe

but compared to what they could have/should have been?……no way

Thing A

by sam23 on Mar 9, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

3 titles = dynasty

come on now

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Mar 16, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

costs and consequences...

kobe pretty much has better numbers than jordan by the same age. not as many titles and mvps but i think that he’s just about done it all in an era where the level of athletic competition raises every 6 months. but kobe does not get the hands down props he deserves unless its from die hard laker fans. why do you think that is?

it took colorado and a $4 million pink rock to his beautiful wife before this guy got his head out of his keyster. and what’s happened since? nba finals and looking at a repeat.

shaq may have bickered with kobe but you, me, and every other cat reading this post knows that shaq is the MAN where ever he goes. he has one of a kind personality and showmanship (did you see the kobe diss last year?), fantastic bball IQ, and pure dominance his whole career. even in his present stint that looks like it may end with a scheduled fishing trip in may, i personally have never seen him play better. but you cannot separate his continued success from his attitude toward the game.

MJ was the ultimate teammate because he devoted all of his amazing talent and effort to the team, particularly later in his career when he was only taking off from like two feet in front of the free throw line. chicago would not have gone anywhere without him, but he wasn’t all “barry bonds” about it. he simply did what it took for his team to win, period. not exactly the attitude problem i was talking about.

artest is very talented, at basketball. his rap album sucked. but he’s not welcomes with open arms, he’s welcomed with terms and conditions. perhaps he has cooled down a little this late in his career and hasn’t socked any other fans like a couple years ago, but the nba is exciting enough without additional popularity stunts done in bad taste. artest is undeniable raw talent. i just don’t think he’ll ever get the respect you’d think he deserves because he doesn’t play the professional role well enough. do you see artest being a respected sportcaster like reggie miller when his playing days are done?

as for captain jack, he hasn’t been a saint. in fact wasn’t him and artest taking turns heaving haymakers in auburn hills? all the same, whether its been because he’s trying to rectify a troubled past or because he just has more heart than your average player he has stepped up and assumed a leadership position that most shy away from. his road from the cba to panama to a title to a brawl (and a stripclub!) to here shows some true grit. and character. oh, and where are his numbers this season as a result?

i’m simply pointing out that better attitudes and long, respected, and illustrious careers are closely related. bill russell, magic johnson (more or less), alonzo mourning.

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

kobe pretty much has better numbers than jordan by the same age.

Really? Well, if you only count this year where Kobe is 30 you’re right. You know why? Because Jordan was playing baseball.

Other than that you can pretty much choose any age you want and Jordan was better. Jordan was the focus of every defense he faced and still managed to average 50% shooting as a guard to Kobe’s 46% (including all the years that Shaq was the focus of the other teams defense). Jordan led the league in scoring 7 times by 30(to Kobe’s two), led the league in steals three times (to Kobe’s… none) and averaged more rebounds, assists, blocks and less turnovers than Kobe. And if they had played in the same era I suspect that Jordan would have locked Kobe’s @$$ up on D.

We tend to forget as time passes but Jordan was ridiculous. He was better than anything we’ve seen since.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 9, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

hmmmm, touche

you got me. technically speaking jordan had numbers that will probably always overshadow kobe or king james for that matter (if you can really compare them). did jordan have any particularly outrageous scandals that magnified any serious character flaws? of course, none of that stuff seemed to ever touch his game on court. i only can think of his alleged gambling problem and the mysterious death of his dad.

yeah, cats like jordan, oscar robertson, sleepy floyd (i guess), vinny the microwave seem to come around less and less. alot of the fundamentals of the game have been lost in the flashin’ lights, to the point where ability trumps talent in this league like 4to1. all the same, the level of play has increased markedly over the years.

still, even though i am a bonafide lifelong laker hater, this is the first time in his career i can say that i actually like kobe and might want to invite him and his family over for dinner sometime. but i don’t think i’d feel that way if he hadn’t manned up some, yaoming?

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

you got me. technically speaking jordan had numbers that will probably always overshadow kobe or king james for that matter

Dont rule out LeBron just yet. He’s on pace to obliterate most of Kobe’s numbers, IF he can put a few championships with that he has a shot to be close to the Jordan level…..Kobe doesnt really have a shot at that (even though ESPN would love for you to believe he does)

of course, none of that stuff seemed to ever touch his game on court. i only can think of his alleged gambling problem and the mysterious death of his dad.

you mean his gambling “problem” that is rumored to be the cause of his dad’s death AND the reason why he was retired/possibly secretly suspended for a season? If thats not scandal that affects your on-court game I dont know what is. I don’t want to throw unfounded allegations around and I’m about as skeptical as anyone of those conspiracy theorists who speculate that Jordan was actually suspended, but if that type of situation occured today it would probably trump steroids, Cowboys, AND Kobe rape stories on ESPN….I suspect that you dont think of it as that big of a scandal only because it hasnt received the same level of media attention.

the level of play has increased markedly over the years.

The average players’ athleticism may be better than it was in Jordan’s day, but I strongly disagree that the overall level of play is better.

Thing A

by sam23 on Mar 9, 2009 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

LMAO

Resembles Satan and Little Bitch?

by venom322 on Mar 9, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's true, no?

Kobe’s a diabolically good player, but he’s also the devil.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Are we going to the zoo?

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0

by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 10, 2009 8:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Haha

Those last two actually snuck up on me and got a good chuckle.

The playoff stats are telling. Jordan was so incredibly competitive, he got better at just about everything in the post-season. It really makes me wish I was as into basketball as much then as I am now (it was only a passing interest for most of Jordan’s career). I only followed the game closely from the mid-late 90’s on so “Jordan fatigue” had already set in and I have to admit I took the guy for granted.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 9, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

Anyone else kind of surprised how quickly the whole basketball world put that behind them.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 9, 2009 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

you left one out

 underwear salesman

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 9, 2009 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

hahahaa

friggin’ skeptic! you crack me up!

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 9, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

you just compare crawford to battier, fisher and grant hill? first of all battier and fisher are role players. They hit their 3s and other shots consistantly and they play defense. Fisher is I think leading the league in drawing offensive charges.

Grant Hill is collecting like the vet minimum and never plays outside what he is capable of.

Crawford is a volume shooter who demands the ball and shoots pretty horribly most of the time

golden state of “unhappy stars who bail for other teams and wind up having a wonderful career”

who is having a wonderful career other than fisher who doesn’t really count since he already had success.

by saintdee on Mar 8, 2009 2:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Arenas comes to mind..

minus the injury. Honestly, I cant think of anyone else. Maybe Richardson, but he has to do something with the Suns before I can consider that.

by venom322 on Mar 8, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Was Arenas unhappy here? He bailed because the Warriors couldn’t pay him close to what Washington could. Richardson hasn’t been any better since he left GS. I don’t remember him being unhappy here either and he didn’t ‘bail’, but was traded and apparently wasn’t happy about it.

by jae on Mar 8, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I wasnt referring to being unhappy

He did leave tho. And started to have a wonderful career, and probably will again.

by venom322 on Mar 8, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

i think

he was talkin about over the past years…many former warriors left to have a good career…sprewell, Cwebb, Jamison, arenas, richardson, murphy has a solid career ,although he was traded, even boykins had a decent career in denver after he left, brian cardinal did good for the dubs but fell off…oh and danny fortson had a decent year for the sonics…pietrus is having a great season with the magics.. oh and Al harrington is kinda beastin for the knicks as of lately… i think what he meant was that at some certain points the warriors had a solid playoff contender team.. but always seem to let some of our key players slip away.. could you just imagine at one point our starting 5 could have been… C-Dampier PF- Murphy SF- Jamison SG Richardson PG Arenas… thats an all star caliber team…

by GSD1 on Mar 8, 2009 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

we're talking attitudes, not numbers

and besides, everybody has a role to play on a team. even a superstar.

have you seen how fish, grant, and shane carry themselves off the court? do you think that these guys wouldn’t have offers lined up out the door for them to be involved in just about any organization at any position? these guys have quality character and proven leadership skill. if you disregard this stuff then you miss out on the tradition that is uniquely nba. it is very much part of the mandatory dress code that stern instituted and does affect perception management and ticket sales.

nobody is perfect, no on is a saint. but keeping composure as a celebrity/professional is important to longevity and future earnings. chris brown’s stock tanked after he beat down rihanna. the same logic applies here and is not exactly reflected in the stats. and a wonderful career extends through playing days to broadcaster to coach to assistant to agent to special consultant, hell even to mayor (see johnson, kevin).

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

touche

if crawford makes 5 mil, he wouldnt be asked to opt out… its financial… what he does, isnt worth the money. not on a team where monta gets 11, maggette 10 and jack 10. u cant have over 40 mil tied to 4 shooting guards
obviously nellie prefers him to belinelli morrow etc but not at the cost of his contract… not when it limits the ability to bring in a Lamar Odom or an upper teir FA this offseason

by tafkasam on Mar 9, 2009 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

and i know...

theres no garentee we can sign a guy like that, but it doesnt mean we should spend the money on a player limiting us from getting that player in the future. That the kind of logic that signs maggette

by tafkasam on Mar 9, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

By the way...

Richardson is sharing top scorer for the Suns game right now, along with Barbosa

by venom322 on Mar 8, 2009 2:42 PM PDT reply actions  

crawford

i think crawford would be happy being a ‘role player’ on a good/great team who could occasionally explode for big numbers. its just hes been on consistently bad teams and really been forced to take the lead and hoist up shots.

i know everyone likes to label crawford as a “loser” in terms of the winning percentages of the teams he’s been on. however, karteblanche is right. he is one of the better people in the league and i don’t think he can be considered a loser or cancer in any way. he is too good of a person to have a negative effect on locker room chemistry in the way that other players have.
he might be overpaid based on his abilities, but that is skewed due to his stats—which are in turn skewed by the fact that he has been on bad teams. i think if surrounded by better players, crawford’s weaknesses wouldn’t be exposed and he would be in the same category as a grant hill.

by gogoldenbears on Mar 8, 2009 4:11 PM PDT reply actions  

WHO GIVES A FU*#@

about whos a good person or not. What the hell is this. Whos GOt the Best Personality constest… This is basketball man, and crawfor flat out is not the right person to compare monta with, crawfod does not even compare. MOnta gots killa Numbers and skill man crawford is weak. crawford plays no D , Teams game plan on him becuse of his weak ass D that gets everyone in foul trouble Espcially Beans. He is not a really good shooter , when some of you say so. Hes got to chuck up shots to get his points man. Does any of the good players got to do that .. good players do there scoreing within the 4 quarters of the game, hell throw 4 bricks in 2 min sometime on a row and give the other teram the lead. Hes got a good loooking stroke that dosent do shit except on every 4th game. He not even presence man people drive by him like nothing and then looks at the dude .(StaRESat the Dude)thats his defence. He kills the momentum of the teams offense. he dribbles dribbles moves to the right then left dribbles some more and then shoots it over a hand in his face. The balll movement dies and the next play the offense is stagnet ,. He dosent now how to do shit , except come through every 4 th game.. and still then he dosent do nothin. Montas plain presence on the floor make other teams do other things , when crawford on the floor teams game plan to attack him / they can drive by him for the layup or start the drive and kick. crawford sucks man.. Just a opinion that makes sense

by X0HennessyX0 on Mar 8, 2009 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

So Crawford plays no d

Who ever said the Warriors are a defensive team anyway?

by Golden Boy on Mar 8, 2009 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good call

Let’s also keep getting crappy defensive players because Don Nelson is the defensive coach of the year, right?

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

good defensive players play good defense whether their coach is good defensively or not...

nelson doesn’t know how to develop and teach defense. if a player already knows it then whats the problem

"so much losers" - hiero

by montamazing on Mar 9, 2009 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol.

Monta also doesn’t have much defense either.

Montas plain presence on the floor make other teams do other things

Yes, like drawing offense fouls from Monta. That’s a talent of Monta’s…one that he definitely needs to work on…badly. Either that or he’s too easy to be read.

by Shells on Mar 9, 2009 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

ho hum. you've got to read my replies in this thread

to get the full effect of the importance of attitude in most any area of life, but we’ll limit discussion to nba.

you cannot in all honesty sit there and say that jamal crawford is weak. that is just pure blasphemy. how many 50 point games has monta had in his career? you know, we really have to step back and realize the impact of a player in don nelson’s system. i don’t know what it is but he may have just as much to do with the success of the players he’s coached than they themselves. crawford is a shooter, and shooters shoot. michael redd, rip hamilton, peja stoyakavic. does he play d? not exactly, but i can count on one hand the number of warriors who do play defense (beans, buike, ronny, randolf, jack and sometimes watson). nellie is obviously more concerned with execution and shooting a team out of the gym than with holding them to 90 points or less a night. there are no less than 5 or 6 streaky player on the roster already, jamal fits right in. whether his $9.5 mil a year will fit is yet to be seen.

and last point on the defense, since that’s your only real beef here: have you been watching any of the games in the last 3 years? every nobody-about-to-be-somebody who has played the warriors has damn near had a career night. guys you have never heard of come out and play the dubs and end up signing autographs after the game. brian scalabrine. marcin gortat. charlie villanueva. brandon bass (ewww he be doing us nasty). it is part of the warriors literally staring at defenders as they fly to the hoop. but on any given night against the warriors, someone will have a career night. it happens every time. i just call it the magic that the dubs bring to the floor, unfortunately it rubs off on the other team just as well. i bet crawford could take you off the dribble…

look, i ain’t knocking monta’s potential skill. but he needs to focus more on playing his game and improving his skill than being a momma’s boy trying to ghostride the moped. he will do more for himself, the fans, and the organization if he steps up to the plate and becomes the man he’s being paid to be.

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

thats a pretty weak man

we were never talkin bout the teams defence

by X0HennessyX0 on Mar 8, 2009 11:47 PM PDT reply actions  

I know

Because you were talking about his “defence”

He not even presence man people drive by him like nothing and then looks at the dude .(StaRESat the Dude)thats his defence.

by Golden Boy on Mar 8, 2009 11:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Defence.

Acceptable alternate spelling, standard spelling in the UK. Maybe you should glance at a dictionary before making fun of others?

More importantly: you don’t really think Crawford’s horrific D is a non-issue … do you? If he played D like Pippen (or heck, even he played D like Baron) I suspect a lot more people here would agree with the silly premise of this diary.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 4:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not from the UK

So I wouldn’t have known. Dude you’re funny. Every time you respond to something of me, you make fun of me all the time. So who are you to tell me not to make fun of someone? When I wasn’t even doing so. My guess is that the majority of you are either late teens to mid-20’s, because only very few of you can tell me your opinion without an insult towards me for making fun of mine. It’s okay I’ll just brush you guys off.

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry

I thought you were mocking his spelling. If not, my bad.

On insults: as many others have pointed out, it’s silly to dish it out as much as you do and then cry victim when you get it back. If you treated others here with respect, and didn’t turn every discussion into a personal referendum about you, I suspect you’d find the tone of your responses change for the better. As I’ve said to you before, no one here gives a rat’s hindquarters about you … and that’s a good thing. There’s your first step towards internet enlightenment.

On topic: you still haven’t answered the question about Crawford’s lack of D. Lord knows I can be a pretty sarcastic dude, but when I’m sarcastic it’s generally to make a point about something I sincerely believe. In the case of Jamal and his execrable defense, it seems to me that you’ve trapped yourself in a sarcastic box where you’ve lost track of the point you were trying to make.

All irony, snark, sarcasm and ;-) aside, I’ll restate the question: do you actually not think Crawford’s horrendous defense (and poor rebounding) are an issue when considering his fitness to be our starting PG?

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

To answer maybe some of what you asked

I get sarcastic back when people are sarcastic with me. You think I like going back and forth and annoying other readers? I’m not like that. I have no problem with people disagreeing with me at all, but say your opinion, maybe why you think that if you want, and leave it at that. It goes both ways. Respect me, and I’ll respect you back.

Yeah dude Jamal probably doesn’t play good d, but who else do we have that can play the pg position effectively? I may be wrong as I’m not the team’s talent scout, but from what I’ve seen. I think it’s him, and we have to work with what we got. With a healthy Monta, I would love to have Crawford at the 1, and Monta at the 2. Specifically, I’d like Crawford to still score when necessary, but overall I’d like him to make plays for others. With his, what I like to call breaking ankles capabilities, I know he can get others wide open and get them the ball quickly.

However, the talk lately is whether him or Ellis should go. If I had to choose one, you all know who I would choose. Monta is the favorite, so 9 out of 10 people here will choose him. I don’t fault them, but I also don’t insult them just because they choose Ellis. Some of you will probably quote some things I said, but it all goes down to how you talked to me first.

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I get sarcastic back when people are sarcastic with me. You think I like going back and forth and annoying other readers? I’m not like that. I have no problem with people disagreeing with me at all, but say your opinion, maybe why you think that if you want, and leave it at that. It goes both ways. Respect me, and I’ll respect you back.

Not that it matters, but this is pretty much BS. Just to jog your memory: you started your last diary off by saying" I don’t care what any of you haters have to say." How is that not starting stuff? It’s easy enough to track down a ton of other instances where you were the instigator rather than victim (I won’t bother quoting them this time, but I think you know what I’m talking about).

I readily admit that I have started crap with you — mostly because you seem to take yourself so freaking seriously — but that hasn’t always, or even usually, been the case. And are plenty of other posters who you’ve basically attacked out of the blue.

Bottom line: stop playing the victim and move the frak on. It’s beyond old.

On topic: I refuse to be pigeonholed into a Monta or a Crawford “camp.” I think both have their strengths and their flaws, but it’s obvious that Monta’s realistic performance expectation next year is higher, and that his upside is a great deal higher. But as I’ve said, at this point I’d be kind of OK with dealing Craw (or letting him walk) and voiding Monta — assuming either is realistic — and moving on with one of the PGs in the upcoming draft.

This for me would be close to an ideal 09/10 ten-man rotation:

1. Rubio/Belinelli
2. Jackson/Morrow
3. Maggette/Azubuike
4. Randolph/Wright
5. Biedrins/Turiaf

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

The I don't care what haters have to say

Is from previous posts’ of the heat i drew from choosing Crawford. I’m just saying that because I knew I’d draw more heat. Dude it’s one of those things that a lot of ya’ll hate me, so no matter what I say, there’s going to be fault in it just for the fact it’s coming from me.

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Totally your imagination.

Can’t speak for the other posters here, but personally don’t know you remotely well enough to hate you or love you. All I have are your words, which, fortunately, you can control really easily. If you started posting in a more reasonable, more impersonal, and less confrontational way, I would forget all this BS in like three seconds.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

You'll be surprised

that if you talk to me respectfully, I can talk back to you the same way. That’s just what type of person I am. If you’re an a$$hole to me, I’m one right back. I’m never one to just be one. Seriously dude, with all due respect, you’re wasting time telling me stuff like be less confrontational. Just talk to me normally, and you’ll see the results. Now, I know you’re sarcastic as your personality. I thought you were like totally insulting my intelligence. I’m just not used to joking around with sarcasm to people I don’t know well. My bad.

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

1. Rubio/Belinelli 2. Jackson/Morrow 3. Maggette/Azubuike 4. Randolph/Wright 5. Biedrins/Turiaf

  Wow, That really sucks! A raw rookie and the town idiot at point? Ballhog boss and don’t you dare touch the ball at 2? The muscle twins bowling squad at #3, Stickmen duo at POWER forward? and the Doo-boyz foul-a-thon at #5?? Who’s the coach? Bozo the clown??

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 9, 2009 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haha.

Well if you put it that way…

I guess it really hinges on whether Ricky Rubio is all that and a plate of tapas. If he’s even 85% of what the scouts are saying (“by far the best and most advanced PG prospect in the world”) I’d gladly go to war with that team. It’s probably a 40-45 win team out of the gate, and, depending on Randolph’s development, a potential 50-60-win team. And even if Rubio’s only as good as, say, Jose Calderón (pretty much his worst case scenario, as he’s apparently already far superior on defense) I like the team better than any we’ve had since the Hardaway-Spree-Owens-Webber crew.

How bout this… you take all your faves: Baron, JRich, Barnesy, TMNT Harrington, together with your league-average bulky center with normal hair — I dunno, say, Erick Dampier. I’d much rather have my team. Yes, even with Bozo the drunken, fat, lying, blackmailing clown as coach.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's (partly) why we need to keep Kelenna around.

His matinee-idol looks keep this place together. If GTTM allows her romantic attention to wander, all hell could break loose here… ;-)

Fortunately, Kelenna is also a very, very solid player. Anecdotally, we seem to suck even more than usual when he’s out.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 9, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol. CP3!
Anecdotally, we seem to suck even more than usual when he’s out.

So true!

Wait, you almost sound like you have a man crush on Kelenna…

by Shells on Mar 9, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haha

Between this and Goldenboy’s apologies for dissing my sexual preference, I’m developing quite a reputation this thread…

Not that it matters, but any mancrush I have on Kelenna is purely of the aesthetic / “wow, think of all the chicks I could have if I were young, single, and had that body!” variety — as opposed to the “Sigh … I want his body” variety.

But of course, there ain’t nothing wrong with the latter, regardless of one’s gender… ;-)

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 10, 2009 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol

Don’t you live in the City? Say you do (I think I’ve read that you did …or was it someone else?)…Alright, say you are really from S.F., then that gender issue certainly doesn’t come as a surprise. =X

That sounds like something to be envious about: Kelenna and his body. Kelenna and his looks. Kelenna is single?

I know for sure, I’m rather envious of his dimples.

by Shells on Mar 10, 2009 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I live in the City...

NYC.

But I lived on Potrero Hill for over 10 years, and basically consider SF home. And yeah, I’m about as pro-gay-rights as Harvey Milk.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Mar 10, 2009 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

’m about as pro-gay-rights as Harvey Milk.

-sorry, goldenboy seems to have left so someone had to pick up the immature gay joke void

Thing A

by sam23 on Mar 11, 2009 5:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

any mancrush I have on Kelenna is purely of the aesthetic / "wow, think of all the chicks I could have if I were young, single, and had that body!" variety

Haha, that would make a nice sig line.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Mar 10, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

for girltothemax. =X

  Ok, but what about you?

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 9, 2009 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

LMFAO!

the town idiot? don’t you dare touch the ball? the muscle twins bowling squad? the stickmen duo? the foul-a-thon duo? omg dude you got me over here rolling! that’s just friggen hilarious. i’d expect nothing less from a true warrior fan.

by karteblanche on Mar 9, 2009 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

hmm

doesn’t seem like that great of a team—especially for an “ideal” rotation. this rotation is ideal for tanking so we can get who? john wall? derrick favors? renardo sidney? greg monroe (if he doesnt come out this year)?

i guess thats not so bad then—but i think we can all agree that we’ve had enough of losing after 14 years…

rubio i doubt will be in this coming draft class and likely in 2010 anyway

by gogoldenbears on Mar 9, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good Attitude?

I’d like to see the “best fans in the NBA” have good attitudes before we ask our players to.

That starts with ridding ourselves of homosexual-degrading comments.

by bradyk2 on Mar 9, 2009 12:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Are you blind?

I apologized to Sleepy already and had no idea of his sexual preference. All I was doing was making fun of his name in return of making fun of mine. Dude quit kidding yourselves. You’re just down talking me just cuz I don’t like Ellis. Get over it.

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Or I'm "down talking you"

because I think the word you used is extremely derogatory whether you were joking or not. I wouldn’t call one of the warriors an N word, and I wouldn’t expect you to call a fellow fan such a word…

No down talking. no hating for you disliking monta. merely stating that I’m not really ok with degrading words.

XOhennesseyXO seems to like Monta Ellis, and he used the same word and I find that just as offensive. Contrary to your belief, I really don’t live my life around your opinions, and am therefore basing my comment merely on what you said that was offensive.

by bradyk2 on Mar 10, 2009 5:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great Post!

I’d like to see Monta handle the situation a lot better than he has. He should automatically assume that he has to make up for what he has done and gain back the respect from the fans. Instead, it looks like his ego has gotten bigger in size like his tatoos have gotten bigger in amount. I want him on this team but he needs to remind everyone why he was offered a $66 million dollar contract and just do the things that we have grown accustomed to seeing him do.

I personally don’t like how they are treating Crawford too. If the rumors are true, than this does not look good for the Warriors. NBA players already don’t want to come to the Bay Area and if they see that this franchise likes to strong arm people to get what they want then that’s how it’s going to continue to be. No stars will want to come here to play ball. I like the points you made about players with good attitudes having longer careers in the NBA and the other guys end up being expendable. You provided some really good examples of that as well. You get a REC.

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 9, 2009 11:19 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Yo

GOLDEN BOY you must have alot of time on your hands. What do you do, watch this site for messages all day. And then cry that everybody else thinks differently then you.

by X0HennessyX0 on Mar 9, 2009 1:42 PM PDT reply actions  

this is all pure entertainment

what a great way to kick start my work week! I’m just at my desk laughing comment after comment.

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 9, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

what a great way to kick start my work week! I’m just at my desk laughing comment after comment.

  I’m sitting in the sun drinking a beer, that’s even better

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 9, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

with glasses of cranberry juice.

are you at the beach..hearing them shells?

by Shells on Mar 9, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

are you at the beach..hearing them shells?

  yeah, they are singing their sweet siren song

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 9, 2009 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

how does the song go?

post the lyrics! share the music sheet…please?

by Shells on Mar 10, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

dang skeptic!

I envy you! hahaha

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 9, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I envy you! hahaha

 Haha, Naw Homes I’d trade my life of leisure, my experience, my fancy cars, and all my women for your ball and chain desk and your youth.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

what cars?

I’d possibly be interested in such a trade, depending on the said cars…

by bradyk2 on Mar 10, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nah idiot, i work with a computer so of course i can check messages

damn most, not all, of you monta supporters cry like babies just because i don’t care for the guy.

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm wrong.

Let Monta stay instead of Crawford. That make you happy?

by Golden Boy on Mar 9, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 9, 2009 6:57 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

My hottest seller on my site LOL...

It helped me go to Wondercon, pay my PG&E Bill and my Comcast Bill LOL!

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 9, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey Tony

I bet if you made one with this guy’s face:

On this poster

And maybe this guy thrown in for good measure:

Just a friendly suggestion. I ain’t askin’ for no free stuff or anything.

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0

by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 11, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOL... it's neverending!

There’s just so much drama!

Beyond Golden State of Design... and than some!
http://www.tonypsd.blogspot.com/

by Tony.psd on Mar 9, 2009 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

tell me about it bro...

there’s drama everywhere you look and TNT thinks they know drama. They don’t know drama until they become a Warriors fan. Seriously though, what direction is this team headed? Does anyone know?

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 10, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously though, what direction is this team headed? Does anyone know?

Yes, I believe I know. It’s just a matter of seconds, hours, days, weeks, months, years and or maybe even a few more decades but it’ll happen. Just a matter of time. We’re going to nail the championship title, didn’t you know?

by Shells on Mar 10, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Awesome!

Thanks Psychic Shells but can you tell me if we’re gonna be champions before I die? or at least before I have grandchildren? haha

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 10, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks Psychic Shells but can you tell me if we’re gonna be champions before I die?

  Hahah, she’s like those shells you place up to your ear and hear a lot of noise but it’s all background noise and don’t mean a thing, LGW, still .

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

you mean..it's not music to your ears?

Is the siren song getting to you? (where’s my music sheet?)

by Shells on Mar 11, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is the siren song getting to you?

  take pity on the poor sailor

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 11, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol

that my dear is beyond my control. I am only allow to see so much of the future.

But seriously, I hope the same thing. In fact, before my great-great grandchildren get married…and I still know what the heck basketball is.

by Shells on Mar 11, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

maybe even a few more decades but it’ll happen.

  the earth has a better chance of getting wiped out by a large meteor

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol

that must be some heck of a meteor.

by Shells on Mar 11, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

that must be some heck of a meteor?

   no, it’s just a garden variety meteor but the odds of the warriors winning a ring are even smaller.

Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 11, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ve said it before, I guess I’m saying it again. Those who think Monta should not be mad at his situation because he is getting a lot of money out of it, that is your perspective. Obviously, not having as much money as Monta does, you are going to value it more (well, most people will). But if you are Monta and you have been playing ball at a high level all of your life, and all of a sudden playing at a high level is not an option for you, you are telling me you would not get frustrated? You accepted your suspension of thirty games, but now even when you are back, your injury is still nagging you and again you are being shelved even though you mentally prepared yourself through the entire fall and winter to be back and ballin by now? Do you really think he is only focused on the money? What I don’t understand is so many of us fans have been complaining about the team and getting fed up this year, but now Monta can’t do that? Doesn’t showing emotion make him look like more of a team player, that he cares about the team succeeding, despite all this money he has?

And getting tattoos is an irrelevant point, if anyone wants to put that out there. Not only does it have nothing to do with his skills, it has nothing to do with his attitude.

No matter what, when Monta got his money, most of the people calling him humble were going to turn on him. They don’t realize they called him humble because they felt closer to Monta since he was paid relatively little to other players (for his performance). I’m sure plenty of us feel like we deserve to be getting paid more. But putting our feelings on someone else, watching that person’s actions not coincide with our feelings, and then putting misunderstanding judgments on that person is unfair. That’s not on Monta. He’s always been “cocky.” You just never wanted to notice it before. But now that the team is struggling because of him you can conveniently notice that. Like I said, that’s unfair.

To any underground rap fan, it’s like this. You might like a certain rapper who keeps it real, doesn’t “sell out,” etc. because you know that’s what you would do if you were a rapper, you would rap for love. But then that rapper begins making his or her way up, and all of a sudden they sold out to you. All of a sudden they are acting different to you, doing all this stuff that you assumed they would never do. When really, it was unfair of you to assume that they should suffer for your entertainment purposes to begin with. When really, it was you wanting them to stay underground that led to your misconceptions about their actions more than their “selling out.”

Don’t be so quick to judge Monta, give him an opportunity to redeem himself.

by belilaugh on Mar 10, 2009 12:46 AM PDT reply actions  

You make a lot of good points...

… but what exactly does Monta need to redeem? We all know he made a mistake over the summer. More importantly, HE knows he made a mistake. He’s not ducking that. I think given the opportunity, he would just like to move on from the incident and get back to ballin’. However, he can’t just drop the issue because the W’s are still holding the whole situation (more specifically, his contract) over his head.

If there are examples of Monta having a bad attitude, I’m missing it. He didn’t bail on the team to “tend to his ill mother”. The team said he had a stiff ankle, which he denies. Honestly, if I were in his situation, and my boss kept me in the doghouse because of one mistake, I would be mad too, especially if I wasn’t given the opportunity to make up for it.

But let’s assume that this specific situation is Monta’s doing. What about all this mess with Crawford now? And Marcus Williams? And not playing Wright and Randolph (until recently), our last two lottery picks? Let’s face it, this team is dysfunctional and is quickly becoming the second coming of the Clips. I don’t know who’s to blame for all this. Maybe Nellie for being stubborn and sticking to his antiquated philosophies and not playing guys that don’t fit his system. Maybe it’s Rowell for getting involved too fast and doling out the fat contracts to Jackson and Nellie. Maybe it’s Mullin for bringing in the right coach and the wrong players, or the right players but the wrong coach. Who knows? All I know is that it’s sad to see this team go from having all this potential one season, and then nothing the next.

Seriously, do any of you see an easy way out of this? We just signed Nellie to a contract extension which means he’s around for 2 more years. He’s already been rumored, in various forms, to have wanted to get rid of Wright, Randolph, Monta, Crawford, Maggette. If these guys don’t fit his style, then we are looking at a completely different team than what is assembled now. And how in the world are we going to make any moves with everyone signed to a long term contract?

Sorry for going OT and into rant mode, but after following the W’s for all these years, and really liking the potential of some of the players we have here, it’s sad to see none of it working, for whatever reason.

by barrance on Mar 10, 2009 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

good post man!

it’s complete chaos in warrior land. It sucks! It seems like drama is popping up everywhere. There’s so many questions with this team.

They can't stop me!!

by ItsDatFriscoSwag84 on Mar 10, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t know who’s to blame for all this.

That’s the real problem. It isn’t clear who is in charge, and I suspect that’s because no one is really in charge. The top level personnel decisions seem to be made three different people at different times with differing and conflicting agendas.

by jae on Mar 10, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

The first thing that needs to be done, in the offseason, is decide who is going to make the calls.

Unfortunetly it looks like it will be Larry Riley as a puppet for Nelson below him and Rowell above him. It would be nice if Cohan and Rowell can bring in one guy and hand him the keys to the Warriors basketball operations, atleast we would have a clear direction and a goal, and someone to fire if we dont reach the goal.

Thing B

by warriorsscore110 on Mar 10, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nellie says whatever he wants, whenever he wants in an effort to motivate his players

Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, and sometimes it backfires. But more to the point, Nellie hasn’t so much tried to get rid of these guys as try to trade his assets for proven talent. Nellie was also rumored to be trying to get rid of Andris (we’ll ignore what was coming back in return… just like you’ve done above), and I’m sure somebody’s spread a rumor about Jack being dangled in a few trade scenarios… looks to me like everybody’s on the trade block! Yay!!! It’s the same for every NBA team, I don’t see what’s so wrong about being open to trading your assets for better pieces. None of the trades went through, so obviously the better pieces weren’t available at the right price.

As much as this season has sucked, and as much as I sound like a broken record here, we’re not as bad as we have performed or as bad as we look. We had a tough, injury & controversy riddled first half of the season, got the major pieces together for 10-15 games to see how they mesh (the results looked pretty good to me), and then shut it down by “resting the veterans” so we could keep our draft position. We’re going to land a top 8 draft pick (barring some insanely bad luck with the ping pong balls), Randolph, Wright, and Belinelli are going to go from unreliable end of bench fodder to somewhat reliable bench players, and hopefully more. We’ll have a healthy Monta, we’ll have a healthy Jax, Maggette will hopefully not try to keep playing on severely injured legs, and Jamal might even opt out, giving us tons of cash that we can use to sign that All Star PF away from Memphis!

The sky is not falling.

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0

by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 10, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nellie says whatever he wants, whenever he wants in an effort to motivate his players

Nellie says whatever he wants, whenever he wants. Player motivation is one, but almost certainly not the only reason for this.

by jae on Mar 10, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, I don’t necessarily think Monta has to redeem anything. I was addressing those that thought he did, so I put it in terms that they would understand. At least I think I did.

by belilaugh on Mar 10, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

second coming?

they have a better record of playoff appearances than we do….they might be the second coming of the Warriors this season

by warriorsvictim on Mar 10, 2009 9:58 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree,

I don’t like Monta’s attitude. And with that kind of attitude, you DO NOT deserve to be the “star” player on the franchise.
But If only we can switch the Minds of Crawford and Monta,…

Then That would be great.

Back to reality, Monta’s attitude/teammate vibe < Craford’s attitude/teammate vibe.

Can you choke without coughing?

by AlbinoWhale on Mar 10, 2009 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

What about Kobe? He's a star, right?

Did his attitude of demanding a trade make him deserving of being a star? Did his raping a young woman in Colorado make him deserving?

Being a star in the NBA, or anywhere else for that matter, has everything to do with what you can do on the court (or the court room, or the construction site, or the corner office). It’s all about execution, getting the job done and earning your company money. You attitude may help or hinder your performance, but it’s still just your performance on the job that matters.

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0

by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 11, 2009 6:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Why Steph Curry is the Warriors most important player, and why they should heavily consider trading him
Warriors2_medium_small
Tom Abdenour... Where is he now?

Recent FanPosts

Ringnovember1981_small
Klay Thompson, a bust?
Small
A little off topic: does GOM sell t-shirts?
Small
Warriors @ Nuggets Preview
Monta_small
Warrior Wonder Standings (December/January)
Angel_beats__logo_small
Looking at the Late-Game playcalls
Ringnovember1981_small
Should Andris Biedrins be sent to the D-League?
Angel_beats__logo_small
An Alternative Explanation to why the Warriors let Lin, Williams and Bell go
Small
Now's the time to trade Curry to Charlotte
Small
Now is the time to make a trade.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot