Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Free agents of interest

 The Warriorsarguably are justas crazy as the warriors when it comes to the offseason and there are some good players out there this year. But notablymost of the players hyere to get would require us loosing Maggs, Marco, Crawford, or Wright.

 

-Mike Bibby: Nelly said they will look at veteran point guards and Bibby would fit well with our offense.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=61

-Jason Kidd:A veteran guard who can play defens, rebound, pass and shoot the 3. Buthe is 36 years old.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=429

-Anthony Carter: He would strictly be a backup but would bring veteran leadership and a good passing ability off the bench.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=137

-Ron Artest: Having him in our lineup would make us look down right dcary. Great Defender, good rebounder an he is a decnt 3 point shooter.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=25

-Trevor Ariza: Great defender, good shooter, still young. He could be good starting or off the bench.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=2426

-Lamar Odom: Him and Randolph would be the dynamic duo and he is good at the 3 or 4. He would fit in perfectly here.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=617

- Hedo Turkoglu:He said he is leaning toward opting out and he is a good passer, and shooter but is not a great rebounder an a decentdefender, but he would demand a large contract.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=862

-Andre Miller: Veteran pint guard who is a good passer and defender but seems like he plays better in a slower system but not neccisarily half court.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=557

-Matt Barnes: Hustle man and why wouldnt we want him back? Everyone remembers howhe played before the tragedy of his mother dying. http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=1765

-Grant Hill: He may be old but he he can run the floor great and would be perfect with Nelly. Leadership skills, and a good defender.http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=336

 

Poll
Who do you most want to see in our uniform?
J-Kidd
72 votes
Ron Artest
90 votes
Lamar Odom
98 votes
Trevor Ariza
60 votes
Hedo Turkoglu
11 votes
Matt Barnes
32 votes
Other (say who)
60 votes

423 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

0 recs  |  Comment 109 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'd be really

happy with any of them except Carter and Hill and Barnes.

The Time Is Now! Win Warriors Win!

by ballin on Apr 27, 2009 6:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Do not put Grant Hill in the same sentence as Anthony Carter or Matt Barnes.

Although I may be biased since he was/is my favorite player from the 90’s.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Apr 28, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

whats wrong w/ barnes

aside from the awful tattoes

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I miss Barnes

He’s cheap, plays with heart, plays solid D, rebounds, is a tough guy, makes Roaracle go nuts, he knows Nellie’s system, he shoots the 3 well – Bring him back!

by Neon on Apr 30, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

picked artest

but kidd or if we could boozer or marion

by Warriorfan on Apr 27, 2009 6:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i picked artest

but if i could, i pretty much equally want artest and odom

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Apr 27, 2009 6:36 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

andre miller

or boozer.

49er faithful since July 11, 1985

by J2daZ on Apr 27, 2009 6:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ron Artest

Is basically a poor man’s Stephen Jackson at this point. He’s not a good rebounder, nor is he particularly good at anything else (He’s a solid defender, but I think he may be coasting a bit on his reputation in that regard).

On the bright side, he’s helping to keep the Rockets/Blazers series tight with his chucking ways. Flip him and Brandon Roy and the Rockets would have swept easily.

On topic: we can’t afford any of the above, except for the ones we don’t want or need like Barnes and Hill. And whose minutes would we be giving to these guys?

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Apr 27, 2009 7:11 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Pretty much nailed it

Artest would probably average more turnovers than Jackson if he handled the ball as much as him. Worst 3 point shooter, maybe even a worst shot selection than Jackson. And we most definitely can’t afford any of those guys unless we somehow get rid of Maggette AND Crawford.

Maybe Andre Miller takes the MLE I doubt it though.

by Captain Jack on Apr 27, 2009 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

nailed it

I wanted Artest a couple years ago, but he was a better defender and a more efficient scorer then. Now he chucks threes on offense and just pushes guys around on defense. The Stephen Jackson comparison is shockingly accurate. I’m not saying he’s a bad defender now, but he’s nowhere near the lockdown guy he was 3, 4, or 5 years ago.

And we won’t have more than 6 mil to spend whether Crawford opts out or not. Odom, Artest, and Hedo (and Boozer-he wasn’t mentioned but I’m sure his name will pop up here soon if it hasn’t yet) will certainly command more than that. I suspect Ariza will make require more than that too, with a good playoff showing he certainly will. Even if he doesn’t play particularly well in the playoffs I’m sure some contender will offer him their MLE which will be more attractive than our offer. I’m guessing Andre Miller and Jason Kidd are in similar positions. They’ll get better money offers or get similar offers from contending teams. Do we really want to overpay for Grant Hill or Matt Barnes? I don’t. Our best hope for free agency is that Kidd doesn’t price himself out of our range and would rather come back home and have the chance to get a few more minutes per game than chase a title by taking MLE money with a contender. Basically free agency isn’t really gonna solve many (if any) of the Warriors problems.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Warriors' cap situation

The 2008 NBA salary cap was $58.7mil.

Our projected cap figure in the offseason with Crawford is $59.3mil.
Without Crawford it is $49.92mil.

The cap has gone up every year at least $2.5mil in the last 3 years, but there are rumors that the cap will actually go down because of the recession. Who knows how much it will go down.

But Crawford’s opt out decision WILL have huge salary cap implications for us this offseason.

"We Deserve"

by YaHeard on Apr 27, 2009 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m pretty not 100% sure about this but I think because of the difference between the hard cap and soft cap Crawford opting out doesn’t actually give us much money to spend at all. I think if he does opt out it puts us about 6 mil below the soft cap but we lose the MLE. If he doesn’t opt out we about a 5-6 milliion dollar MLE. Again, I’m not entirely certain how this all works, I’m sure jae, cap, DFiB or someone else with much more knowledge about the workings of the salary cap can explain this much better, but I’m almost positive Crawford’s decision doesn’t really have much impact on how much money we have to spend this offseason.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We also have to have 12 players under contract. For purposes of signing a free agent, if that free agent wouldn’t put us at 12 or more contracts, the NBA min salary is added to the cap as holds for those spaces. Unless we relinquish Watson and do not pick up Morrow’s contract, we’ll have to calculate in a couple of additional warm bodies that will eat up a small bit of the theoretical Crawford-opt-out-space.

Crawford really makes some difference in whether MLE pushes us towards lux tax or not, but it does almost nothing for out short term spending possibilities without any other moves.

by jae on Apr 28, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget...

about our first round pick. By my quick math we will be around 50.65mil if Crawford opts out, but our rookie will count against our cap right away and that should eat up another 2.2-4.1mil depending where we pick. So that leaves us at around 52.85 best case.

Assuming that Cap stays at $58.7mil (which, as you said, it may not)

58.7 – 52.85 = 5.85 mil of Cap space, right? I could be off by a bit, but not by that much.

If you combine that with the fact that Crawford is not very likely to opt out, it’s not really worth getting excited about.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Apr 27, 2009 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks, thats what I was lookin for. don’t we also lose the MLE if he does opt out?

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...

We can choose whether or not to accept the MLE. If we accept it we have to operate as if we are over the cap. If we choose to pass on the MLE and use whatever cap space we have, we have the added advantage of being able to make trades where we take back more salary than we send. The strict trade rules with regard to salary only apply if you are over the cap.

So theoretically, if Crawford opts out, we could make a trade like:

Brandan Wright
1st round pick

for

Better player that makes around 5mil more than we are sending out.

I think…

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Apr 27, 2009 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok

well then there is a significant advantage to be gained by him opting out, it just doesn’t really apply to free agency at all. Thanks.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When does Crawford have to decide on his opt out? If its before the draft that would give us even more money to work with in a trade.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 28, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No problem...

I did the same thing a while ago and someone (probably Jae) reminded me too. It could still help in terms of a trade, but there doesn’t look to be any hope of signing anybody for more than the MLE.

Sam: I’d have to look it up for sure, but I think the deadline for the opt-out is after the draft, and just before free agency. I think it’s one of those things that screws us in multiple ways, because I don’t think we can trade him until he officially makes his decision. So if there is someone interested in taking him off our hands as part of a draft day deal I think we would have to get him to approve it by giving written notice that he will not opt out. I could be off on all this but IIRC that’s how it works.

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Apr 28, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In a foggy, beer-blurred view I can see Kidd decide that he wants to give it a go playing in the Bay Area and settling for an MLE deal here. That’s what other non-Dallas teams will have to work with as well. The fear is that the Warriors drool at that and toss more years at him than any other team would pony up. The only ‘good’ thing is that the over-36 rule means that they’re further limited in the number of back-end years they can give him.

And then I sober up and realize that he would have to be drunk to want to play here.

by jae on Apr 27, 2009 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Artest is a much better defender than Jackson

they call battier and him the 2 headed snake. and he shot 40 percent on 3’s and shot the same on overall Fg. He also has been a much better career rebounder so….

by montadaboss on Apr 27, 2009 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Artest has the reputation of a much, much better defender than Jackson, but again if you really watch him I don’t think he’s really all that much better. That reputation is perpetuated by the guys at ESPN and TNT to the point where we all simply assume it to be true. He’s stronger than Jackson and thus a better post defender, but from what I’ve seen of him this season the days of him shutting down elite scorers are over. Sure its probably a pain in the ass for guys to have to deal with being defended by the extremely pesky Battier AND the super-physical Artest (particularly in the playoffs where he’s can be even more physical) I’m not saying he’s a bad defender, he’s still an above average one, but Stephen Jackson is too (when he wants to be) Artest is probably still better defensively but I wouldn’t call him elite anymore.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jack v. Artest

Yeah, I was being intentionally provocative with the “Poor Man’s Jackson” comment. I think they’re comparable players in terms of productivity — Jack a better playmaker, TruWarier a slightly better rebounder and more rugged defender, both WAY too in love with iso plays and launching from deep. And, checkered pasts aside, they’re both very charismatic and likable dudes who can contribute to good team chemistry if they have a true team leader/ franchise player to keep their egos in check. I’d gladly take either (or even both) of them on reasonable 3 year MLE-type deals that took them up to age 32-33 or so. But it’s silly to think either is an irreplaceable franchise-cornerstone-type player.

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Apr 28, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I thought Stephen Jackson was a Poor man’s Stephen Jackson…depending on what night you get to see him.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Apr 28, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually agree with you

I was thinking that he’s just like Jackson while I was voting on this poll. Me agreeing with you…? I think I’m gonna barf.

by Golden Boy on Apr 29, 2009 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aha

You’re beginning to see the light, grasshopper… ;-)

Now here’s a gift for you:

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Apr 29, 2009 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

a much better defender.

and if u believe it, actually a much worse (or actually less efficient) shooter

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

id go for AC

defneds and passes and is a vet just what the doctor ordered we dont need another 2/3 swingman we need a PG but are overestocked for a starter. so AC is who id choose

+have you seen kid play lately?

defense? come on

by gswfan1 on Apr 27, 2009 7:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

AC?

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Apr 27, 2009 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anthony Carter

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually not the worst idea. George Karl really likes him so I don’t know how much we’d have to overpay to get him out of there, but he could be a nice bench player. I’d rather draft Ty Lawson, but if we somehow lucked into a top 3 pick or don’t draft a PG I wouldn’t mind Carter at all

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jason Kidd is still a better defender than any of the guards and wings not named Stephen Jackson on our roster.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

POINT GUARD

Andre Miller, Jason Kidd, Mike Bibby – in that order. Playoffs for sure with either of those 3 and minus Crawford.

by Neon on Apr 27, 2009 8:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Marco Belinelli and Rob Kurz for Lebron James and Mo Williams

We Believe

by RunNdGun on Apr 27, 2009 8:49 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

salaries don’t work. plus, i’m not sure i’d want to give up marco, any way we can work that trade with crawford instead?

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Apr 27, 2009 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

because you started off with “salaries don’t work” you actually had me for a half a second…..til I read the name.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

glad to keep you on your toes.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Apr 28, 2009 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NO WAY

i would never trade kurz for lebron

kurz is our mascott

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Apr 27, 2009 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i pay 500 to sit courtside for kurz.

cant say the same for lebron

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

1. Jason Kidd – doesn’t matter how old he is. He improves every aspect of our team: perimeter defense, halfcourt offense, fastbreak offense, ball movement, ballhandling, veteran leadership, rebounding, everything.

2. Lamar Odom – a real point forward who can shoot, defend, and rebound

3. Rasheed Wallace – he’s old but still provides two valuable dimensions: post defense and post scoring

5. Jamario Moon – athletic defender with a solid jumper

6. Ron Artest – still one of the best defenders in the game. We’re the worst defensive team the NBA has seen in years, what Artest does to or for our offense doesn’t matter as much

7. Ramon Sessions – true PG and huge upgrade over CJ Watson

8. Shane Battier – proven and consistent defense, 3-point shooting

If Crawford opts out, we’ll have $8-9mil in cap space to use. If he doesn’t opt out, we’ll have the $5-6mil MLE to use. There is also always the possibility of sign-and-trades as well.

"We Deserve"

by YaHeard on Apr 27, 2009 9:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Foyle's contract

already counted that

"We Deserve"

by YaHeard on Apr 27, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

like OM said above

when you figure in the rookie we’ll draft there isn’t much of difference at all

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 27, 2009 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wait what?
3. Rasheed Wallace – he’s old but still provides two valuable dimensions: post defense and post scoring

The first? Sure. The second? I don’t think so. Rasheed Wallace is about the un-postiest-post that you’ll ever meet, when it comes to offense.

by markdash on Apr 29, 2009 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

really?

you don’t like his turnaround jumper from the post? it’s kind of unstoppable

"We Deserve"

by YaHeard on Apr 29, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a good move

and hard to stop, but you can get turnaround jumpers from any position, really. It’s a lot harder for point guards to back a guy down, make a head fake and dunk on someone’s dome.

That’s the kind of stuff I usually associate with “post scoring,” but I’m open to the possibility that my definition is too narrow.

by markdash on Apr 29, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

I don’t think your definition is too narrow. Sheed has shown he does have some very nice post moves, however he doesn’t have much of a post game because he sits outside waiting to chuck 3’s so much more often than he goes down low and uses his post game. Does anyone really think Don Nelson is gonna be the guy who gets a stubborn old Sheed to STOP throwing up 3’s? I’m not against Wallace if the price is right because I think his unique skill set would still help this team, but I probably don’t want him for any more than the MLE which is what he’ll get from a contender. Sheed in San Antonio makes them contenders for one or two last runs. Parker/Manu/(random veteran who can hit an open shot and defend)/Sheed/Duncan creates sooo many ridiculous matchup problems. I don’t know if they could stay healthy, but if they could theyd almost certainly give the Lakers all they can handle.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

1kidd- probably wants 1 more run at championship and can still start. Id love him to end his career in oakland though

2 lamar- we dont have cap room for him, even if crawford opts out.

3 sheed- championship team

4 unsure where 4 went lol

5 jamario- not an upgrade to our current team. just gives nellie another sf option at pf to limit bwrights minutes

6. artest- artest + jackson = inefficiency at its best

7 sessions- doubt milwakuee lets ih league

8 houston loves him but hed bee a great role player

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Andre Miller

would be the perfect addition to the team. Likely won’t be too expensive, can guard the bigger guards that monta cannot, and is an actual distributor. just look what he did with the barely above average 76ers!

by livingthedream on Apr 27, 2009 11:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bob Fitzgerald is that you?

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 28, 2009 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

that’s the right thinking, IMO – we need a 1 who can do the things you said

by Neon on Apr 28, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Miller is not the kinda player that would do well under Nellie. Slow, half court oriented, cant shoot from the outside…no

Odom could do well here, will be up for grabs and shouldnt demand anymore than 10 mill a year (aka Maggette money), making him a good play.

Artest…I like the idea, but homeboy is in denial about his offensive skills. Still a decent on balll defender, but the guy thinks he can score the ball like james or kobe. He would kill this team. I cant see it working.

Ariza is going to be locked up by lakeshow, hence the reason odom will be in play.

Jason Kidd would be solid on this team, but no matter how good he can be, you dont want to overpay and/or give too long of a contract to a 36 year old. Of course, the warriors had the same fear with Baron and decided not to extend the 29 year old point….i guess that will be the exact reason the warriors offer Kidd a multiyear deal!

Barnes….not sure why nobody wants him back. He is thriving in Phoenix once Gentry took over. I think he has the skills, and it doesnt seem like a lot of teams will offer him a lot….hell, phoenix has him for less than 1 mill this year….maybe we can get him for an azabukie type contract

Hedo….too much money for what the guy can really do. Cant play D, subpar rebounder for his size, likes to shoot..a lot….sounds like the warriors kind of player, but we are much better off without him.

Anthony Carter….solid bench player, but is he really a difference maker? wouldnt mind seeing him here, but it has to be in addition to other, bigger moves

Rasheed Wallace = cancer. This guy, when he’s not winning, is half hearted, doesnt care, racks up T’s (which we have enough of with the Captain). Yes he’s talented, but no thank you. We may have revived Jackson’s career, but I dont see Wallace thriving in Oaktown.

Mike Bibby – could work out ok. Moves the ball, shoots fairly well…not worth a long term contract though. Maybe 3 years at 5 mill or something…Im not sure he’s worth anything more, and no reason to offer too much. Solid contributor, but not a savior.

Boozer/Bosh….sign an extension first and then we’ll talk

by rtgunn on Apr 27, 2009 11:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Miller is not the kinda player that would do well under Nellie. Slow, half court oriented

I don’t think we’re talking about the same Andre Miller.

I was a huge fan of picking up Odom until about 6 months ago. Now I’m not sure that even if we were able to free up the kind of money it would require it would be worth taking a lot of minutes from Randolph. If we were to free up some money Odom would require a pretty hefty and long term contract. I’m not convinced either he or Randolph is very good fit at the 3 and if you’re counting on Monta and Biedrins to join those two in the starting lineup for the next 5 years then you don’t have anyone who really stretches the defense by being much of a perimeter threat. I like Odom a lot and I’d love to see him playing under Nellie, but unless you’re planning on making Randolph a part of a deal for another veteran star I don’t think its worth it.

I agree that Ariza is not likely to get out of LA. If he does I think another contender goes after him hard.

Yea you don’t want to give Kidd too much but we’ve got pretty limited funds to work with and how long of a deal can he really be looking for? I think he’s a pretty good fit and who wouldn’t love to see one of the best Bay Area hoopsters ever finish his career here?

I don’t really have anything against Barnes but he seems like a strong candidate to get too much money for too many years. I don’t want another wing like that. For a couple mil per or for a little more money on a one or two year deal sure bring him back.

Hedo is intriguing to me. I think its pretty unrealistic to think we have any kind of a real shot at him, and yes, his D is just as bad as most of the guys we already have. But he is the rare kind of playmaking wing who would make Monta at PG much, much easier.

I totally agree about Carter. Meh, I’d take him, but I don’t think it makes us more than 1 or two wins better max.

I’m curious to see what the market for Sheed looks like. If no contender wants to deal with him and he’s looking for MLE money on a short term deal (very unlikely) I think he’s too good of a talent, and too good of a fit to not pursue.

Bibby-I really don’t know. I wrote the guy off as done a couple years ago and he continues to surprise me. He’s not a very efficient scorer, but he seems to have made Atlanta a much better team.

Boozer-probably not worth the money (not that we’d have it to give anyway)
Bosh-depends on Toronto’s asking price. One of Monta/Biedrins/Randolph plus one of Jackson/Maggette/Crawford plus one of Azubuike/Belinelli/Wright plus maybe a swap of draft picks (assuming neither of us gets a top 3 pick) and I’m probably in. More than one from that first group and I’m against it.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 28, 2009 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice to see

someone is on the same page as me. I think your comments echoed and clarified what I posted above, especially about sheed. I think the only thing I disagree about is miller and bosh. I would be willing to see any part of your mentioned combinations for bosh so long as he’s extended, instead of trading the house and watching him bounce after next year. As for Miller…I know hes a decent defender, a great passer and a good sized guard…i dont know, maybe i think he’s slow when really he’s a bit more patient. It would be interesting, but again, I dont know if he’s the difference maker for this team

by rtgunn on Apr 28, 2009 1:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

miller is not a halfcourt pg...

he’s running the show for one of the best run and gun teams in the league right now…the 76ers…that is not a half court team..

"so much losers" - hiero

by montamazing on Apr 28, 2009 3:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Miller is a beast in the open court. Whomever thinks he can’t run doesn’t watch a lot of basketball. The guy’s made for the open court b/c of all his passing skills. His biggest problem is his shot isn’t that good, which is why he’s not as good in the half court, though of course he’s still way above average.

by Neon on Apr 28, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea I think Miller is the only one we truly disagree on, and even though I think he’s a very good uptempo PG, I don’t see him as a great fit either. I don’t know that we need a 3 pt marksman in the backcourt with Monta but I think we certainly need someone who is at least something of an outside threat. A starting backcourt with two guys who rarely even take, much less make, an open 3 probably isn’t the best idea for any team. I like Andre Miller a lot, but I think Bob Fitzgerald hyping him up every day on KNBR has made many think he would be some sort of franchise savior. I don’t know if its just sentimentality, but I’d much rather get Kidd (I know he’s not the most reliable outside shooter either).

I’m willing to take a chance on dealing for Bosh even without an extension in place simply because I don’t feel like we have all that much to lose. I wouldnt want to deal 2 of our 3 best young players for him anyway, but if we did I would certainly expect we’d either have an extension in place or some good reason to believe he’d be staying/

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 28, 2009 3:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

miller is a physical defender

 thats why he would be a great fit, even though he does not spread the floor as well. but if half court we should be running motion offense, not the crappy drive and kicks to bust threes which imho did not work well for us.
 another thing that miller brings is he can post up smaller guards ala baron. in fact come to think of it, baron had trouble posting up miller in their matchups down low, as well as other physical pgs like deron, billups and cp3.
  I dont know if miller acquisition will get us to playoffs next year, but spreading the floor is the least of my worries, because we will have jack on the 3, and morrow, kaz as backups. with solid passing PG pushing the ball we should have most of our early offense going to Monta with Randolph running the floor as well. In fact that is what Philly doing right now, mostly early offense, where T.Young is playing that athletic finisher role.
 Now if Randolph can develop a reliable 18-20 feet jumper that would be a huge bonus for us, and in that case we can probably sneak into playoffs.
 Miller is by far the best option for us at PG right now. Kidd will be very good as well, but he has slowed down quite a bit, and nearly not as effective on defensive end.

by farid on Apr 28, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how much do u think ariza will command?

I would love him in golden state, even if hes superflous. but theortetically if we can trade a few swings for a big we could use a swing signing

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He would help so much

imagine Jack only having to guard the opponent’s best defender half the time – wow

by Neon on Apr 30, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah obviously we'd have to make some trades

but i really like his game. I think hes only going to improve. Seems to have his head on straight and care. Sadly i dont see lakers parting with him unless we grossly overpay

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anybody on that list except

Anthony Carter, Matt Barnes, Grant Hill and J-Kidd

If you want a success story just take a look at mine.

by LighTz707OuT on Apr 28, 2009 8:07 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

so anybody on the list except the ones we might be able to afford?

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 28, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

People seriously underestimate Grant Hill.

Dudes a beast! He’ll put up 25/6/5 in small ball…..easily. In under 25 minutes a game too. He’s the next Jordan.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Apr 28, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hill before his disastrous ankle fracture

seemed headed to be one of the best all time forwards—I actually preferred his all around game and style to Jordan’s. He’d still be one of the best defenders on this woe-yr squad in his diminished capacity, as challenged on d this team is.

by the.monk on Apr 28, 2009 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only real time i’d root against the Bulls was when they played the Pistons with Grant Hill. Too bad we never got to see him dominate the league in his prime, same goes with Penny.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

by kenntoe on Apr 28, 2009 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

by

all around game
do you mean “not nearly as good of a scorer”? If not what do you mean, because MJ’s game was about as “all around” as anyone’s. ever.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

noticed a typo

MJ’s game was as about as even more “all around” as than anyone’s. ever.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Apr 29, 2009 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ha

thanks

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

though

LeBron is looking like he may give him a run for his “all around” money.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Magic

Was a 6-9 PG (best PG ever, actually) who filled in for Kareem at center in the playoffs. Point, Magic. Then again, he didn’t play D like Jordan or LeBron.

I guess I need a better definition of “all-around” (as distinct from simply “great”) before casting my vote…

Thing 1

by Sleepy Freud on Apr 29, 2009 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmmm

ok, that’s fair. i’d count overall excellence as a part of an all around game, so a “jack of all trades, master of none” would clearly be inferior to a “jack of most trades, master of a bunch”. it’s close, but i think the d gives jordan the “all around” edge, but again, it’s really, really close. can we start having the nba give out awards for things like this? or would that ruin the fun of just debating it for no reason?

and i think lebron eventually claims the title of “best all around game”. ever.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Apr 29, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

do you think LeBron will be viewed as better then MJ when his career is done? Obviously its way too early to make a very educated guess, but the fact that he’s even got a realistic shot is impressive. This could probably be a decent offseason thread topic.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i wanna say yes. the guy is such an athletic freak and adored by his teammates, so it seems like he’ll be able to have good guys flock to play with him (something that isn’t directly related to his game, but could determine how many titles he wins). a friend of mine put it this way: “lebron james splits the difference between mj and magic.” and i couldn’t disagree. if he keeps improving, he’ll be better than mj; he doesn’t have that far to go.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Apr 29, 2009 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s not always the best marker, but if Lebron doesn’t come close to Jordan’s 6 titles, the consensus will be that Jordan was better, that his competitive fire just burned brighter. It’s tough to remember just how good Jordan, Magic and Bird were at their peak but I think Lebron is in that category though in terms of individual production. In some respects, he may be better relative to the league as a whole, though presently being ring-less will create doubt.

by jae on Apr 29, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s tough to remember just how good Jordan, Magic and Bird were at their peak

Not if you pop the three “Ultimate Jordan” DVDs in as often as I do. : )

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jordan is overrated

How many titles did he win without Phil Jackson and Scottie Pippen?

That’s right, zero!

(I just wanted flip the usual anti-Phil Jackson argument around to see how it looked. As I expected, it looks preposterous.)

by markdash on Apr 29, 2009 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fool your ass is on crack.

Jordan is the greatest of all time. He made everybody on team better. His Wizards team doesn’t count. He was too old to bring them back. They known nothing about winning. If you want to know who is overrated? Lebron is overrated. That dood can’t shoot if his life depend on it. Was his D’s better than Jordan in his early yrs? Hella naw. The only reason why he is getting so much love is because his team plays in the weak ass east. Back in day Jordan plays in a strong eastern conference. And ppl said he is better then Kobe? Bullshyt. Hand down Lebron will always be second to Kobe and a 100 mile away from Jordan.

by warriorfan4life on May 3, 2009 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you clearly did not understand my post.

by markdash on May 3, 2009 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he even read it, quite frankly ...

… or maybe he thinks words in parentheses don’t count.

by Ronaldinho on May 4, 2009 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha
Not if you pop the three "Ultimate Jordan" DVDs in as often as I do. : )

The actual copy from my personal collection…

Thing 2

by olympicmike on Apr 29, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ha, nice

I seriously can’t count the number of times I’ve watched those 5 games.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 30, 2009 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

his team is not good

without lebron cleveland doesnt make the playoffs. Less u think wallyworld will shoot them in.

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

way too early to tell. MJ wasnt MJ at 24. He hadnt won any titles. Itll be defined by winning. 2 three peats with no championship losses is pretty impressive. Especially considering he retired in between.

by tafkasam on Apr 30, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jordan won his first title in his 7th year (I think) Lebron is in his 6th year. Not a huge difference there.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 30, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lebrons been to a final

granted in a weak east….but with a real crap team

by tafkasam on May 3, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lets face it

anyone on that list would make us better.

There's a party in my mind.
And I wish that I was there.

by qin on Apr 28, 2009 2:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yes and no

I’m not a huge fan of Bibby and I wouldn’t be exciting about brining him in, but I also would never have guessed he would be the guy to take Atlanta from “talented bunch of youngsters” to legitimate playoff team. He doesn’t look all that fantastic on paper, but the guy has already been a big part of turning around two woeful franchises with PG issues. Its not like he or the Hawks get much attention, I’m not sure you can call him overrated.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Odom or Ariza

Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or John Wall. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Andre Smith in Silver & Black in 2009.

by ejdacanay on Apr 28, 2009 10:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Odom or MIller

I'm gametime_gsw, and i aprove this message.

by gametime_gsw on Apr 28, 2009 11:02 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

drew G

30 Y 197 cm 115 kg 0 IQ

by Lat We N Trash on Apr 29, 2009 12:29 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

ha

really?

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

really?

no :)

30 Y 197 cm 115 kg 0 IQ

by Lat We N Trash on Apr 29, 2009 1:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ramon Sessions

What about Ramon Sessions?

by Arr on Apr 29, 2009 10:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Last summer, I thought that he was a guy we might have been able to make a reasonable trade for. Now he’s a better known entity and won’t come as cheaply, but is still a guy who would improve our team.

The Bucks will have to make some decisions regarding payroll to stay under the tax and they may have to decide between Villanueva and Sessions (it’s a no brainer in my opinion, but NBA execs may feel differently) which might make him obtainable. He might be available in the same way that Turiaf was: price the Bucks into the tax if they want to keep him.

Not a free agent, but a guy who might be available in trade is Renaldo Balkman. He’s the complete opposite of exciting in that he’s not a point scorer, but he’s efficient when he (ever so rarely) shoots, doesn’t turn the ball over and a phenomenal rebounder for a 3. He’s a plus defender who is underutilized in Denver and could be a Bowen-style lockdown with added rebounding punch. He’s such the opposite of what Nellie wants that I know it won’t happen, but if the team was looking for a way to sure up defense and rebounding, he’d be a great acquisition.

by jae on Apr 29, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bowen was a good offensive player for the Spurs. If you can shoot the corner 3 like that you’re not an offensive liability. Balkman seems like a straight up offensive liability to me. I wonder what he even does… he’s probably not the best screener, he can’t float around the perimeter, he can’t clog up the post, he can’t handle the ball…

I would be intrigued If the Nuggets still played decent offense with him on the floor. Conventional wisdom says that a 3 with his range and offensive skillset can’t help offensively, but conventional wisdom is often wrong.

by antihero on Apr 29, 2009 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bowen was not a good offensive player overall. He was a one-trick pony who had a good 3pt set shot, but his offensive efficiency was better than the league average in his career and he hit average one other time. His overall shooting percentage was only slightly higher than his 3 pt % (almost half his shots were 3s), he didn’t hand out assists and he almost never got to the FT line (and when he did, he wasn’t very effective there).

by jae on Apr 29, 2009 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bowen was right for the Spurs. They didn’t want or need him to learn any new tricks. He did one thing well enough, stretch the floor to make his more talented teammates deadlier, and that allowed the Spurs to play him as much as they did. Bowen driving and getting fouled, or handling the ball and making nice passes, would have made the team offense worse.

If the Balkman could find a role like that here, great. Maybe he’s great at diving to the basket and we can capitalize on that in our game plan. Or maybe he’s just a liability.

by antihero on Apr 30, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

defense and rebounding? what are those?

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 29, 2009 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what about shawn marion?

they list him as free agent this year, is that correct? i understand he can opt out if we give him a longer term contract, or we can sign and trade.

by farid on Apr 30, 2009 2:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yea he’s a free agent, but he really wasn’t very good this year. I’d probably sign him to a 2 year deal at MLE money but I don’t think I’d offer more than that.

Thing A

by sam23 on Apr 30, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Help Fire Don Nelson By Signing Petition
We_re_back__small
Terms of Service and Moderation on GSoM...
Small
Five Good Things So Far
484214594_82b6b3554a_small
The Warriors as Simpsons
Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Live-Tweeting from Row 8!!! (GSoM's Charity Auction seats)

Recent FanPosts

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small
Jonny Flynn, Wayne Ellington, Corey Brewer: Summer Glimpse to Fall For-Real
Sp_baron_edited_small
Could the Warriors run the triangle offense?
Small
Would you be opposed to trading Ellis?
Australian_flag_reduced_small
Miami Interested in Stephen Jackson Trade
Small
Who is your starting 5 if you ran the team?
Follett_small
The Golden State Warriors players have already given up on Don Nelson
Photo-225x300_small
On Mikki Moore, Anthony Randolph, and 'Done' Nelson
Oaklandathletics_small
facebook Members: Keep the A's in OAKLAND
Small
They're bad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GSoM Motto

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Ads

SPONSORS

2009-2010 Around the Association

2009-2010 Golden State Warriors Preview

Golden State Warriors 2k9-2k10 Super Preview Blowout Special!


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Chef_randolph_gs_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae