Would you be suprised if Monta Ellis is no longer a Warrior by next season?
Meaning Monta Ellis would be dealt in a trade during this offseason. As much as he is a valuable player, There IS NO PERCENTAGE of Monta being traded.
Either way, the Warriors roster would still be not only exciting, but will compete for a playoff spot, or maybe more.
So here's my scenario; ...IF Monta is traded for whatever reason,
Say we get Bosh or Amare for Monta and other's, I rather keep Biedrins than Monta because defense is what wins games for you.
-Don't get me wrong, Monta is full of offense but crappy on defense.
-So we get rid of 'some' offense(We won without Monta multiple times)
and we gain some defense(from whoever we get from the trade)
Lineup would be like-
SG-Steven Jackson(Defensively, I like him, but Turnover MANIAC)
PF-Bosh, Bargnani, Amare or (Whoever we get for Monta& Wright or Maggette)
PG- CJ Watson- (Whoever we draft-Ty Lawson, Patty Mills, etc.)
SG- Morrow (He can improve his handles during offseason)
SF- Maggette (If he doesn't get traded)
PF- Randolph- Wright (If he doesn't get traded)
C- Turiaf- Davidson- Kurz
*And Crawford, if he doesn't opt out, he probably will get traded for someone who'll be in the 2nd unit also.
I really want Toronto to trade Bargnani and/or Bosh for Monta & Pieces(Exluding randolph) Because- then we'll have the Italy connection with Marco and Bargnani.
Imagine a Starting lineup to be like this:
SG Steven Jackson(Can't get rid of him, 1% chance he'll get traded, no team wants him)
SF Azabuike or Bosh(If we get him) Randolph( If Randolph, The Lineup is VERY TALL)
PF Bargnani- Randolph
C Biedrins -Turiaf/Davidson/Kurz
-Morrow can be a SG/SF in 2nd unit and CJ& Draft pick 2nd unit for PG.
I know I lack stats and not accurate, so don't take things too seriously.
I don't hate Monta so please don't flame me.
I'm asking for your honest opinion on 'Do you THINK or WANT Monta to is going to be/stay a Warrior.'