Would you be suprised if Monta Ellis is no longer a Warrior by next season?

Meaning Monta Ellis would be dealt in a trade during this offseason. As much as he is a valuable player, There IS NO PERCENTAGE of Monta being traded.

Either way, the Warriors roster would still be not only exciting, but will compete for a playoff spot, or maybe more.

So here's my scenario; ...IF Monta is traded for whatever reason,

Say we get Bosh or Amare for Monta and other's, I rather keep Biedrins than Monta because defense is what wins games for you.
-Don't get me wrong, Monta is full of offense but crappy on defense.
-So we get rid of 'some' offense(We won without Monta multiple times)
and we gain some defense(from whoever we get from the trade)

Lineup would be like-

PG- Marco
SG-Steven Jackson(Defensively, I like him, but Turnover MANIAC)
SF- Azabuike
PF-Bosh, Bargnani, Amare or (Whoever we get for Monta& Wright or Maggette)
C- Biedrins

2nd Unit-

PG- CJ Watson- (Whoever we draft-Ty Lawson, Patty Mills, etc.)
SG- Morrow    (He can improve his handles during offseason)
SF- Maggette   (If he doesn't get traded)
PF- Randolph- Wright   (If he doesn't get traded)
C- Turiaf- Davidson- Kurz

*And Crawford, if he doesn't opt out, he probably will get traded for someone who'll be in the 2nd unit also.

I really want Toronto to trade Bargnani and/or Bosh for Monta & Pieces(Exluding randolph) Because- then we'll have the Italy connection with Marco and Bargnani.

Imagine a Starting lineup to be like this:

PG Marco
SG Steven Jackson(Can't get rid of him, 1% chance he'll get traded, no team wants him)
SF Azabuike or Bosh(If we get him)  Randolph( If Randolph, The Lineup is VERY TALL)
PF Bargnani- Randolph
C Biedrins -Turiaf/Davidson/Kurz
-Morrow can be a SG/SF in 2nd unit and CJ& Draft pick 2nd unit for PG.

I know I lack stats and not accurate, so don't take things too seriously.

I don't hate Monta so please don't flame me.

I'm asking for your honest opinion on 'Do you THINK or WANT Monta to is going to be/stay a Warrior.'