Polling GSoM: Who was the worst defender on the 2008-2009 Golden State Warriors?
GSoM friend Tim Kawakami recently posted his 2nd Annual NBA No-Defense Team. This annual fair never ceases to crack me up. We all know the Warriors were the worst defensive team in the league at a whopping 112.3 ppg for a plethora of reasons, namely: a) young players typically play poor D, b) this essentially Chris Mullin constructed roster isn't filled with any players known for their defensive prowess aside from Stephen Jackson and Ronny Turiaf, c) head coach Don Nelson isn't exactly considered a Hall of Fame caliber coach because of his defensive schemes, d) and even the Raiders have a better defensive coordinator than Keith Smart.
Was this required offseason reading for these guys last summer or something?
Each Warriors claim to WDWY (Worst Defensive Warrior of the Year) after the jump.
Around the midpoint of this past season I dropped The 2008-2009 Defense(less) Golden State Warriors (2/5/09). Here's a few additional thoughts now that the "glorious" 2008-2009 Golden State Warriors season finally came to an end.
Kelenna Azubuike- He might be an average to slightly below average defender on another team because he usually plays decent position D. His footspeed isn't there and he gets beat off the dribble, but I'd have a hard time calling Kaz the worst defender on this horrifically defenseless squad.
Marco Belinelli- His D was remarkably improved in essentially what was a decent month of play, but it's still atrocious. If he wants to stay in this league, he should be watching a LOT of film this summer and pay more attention on the court so his man doesn't embarrass him on simple backdoor cuts and what not.
Andris Biedrins- This supposed franchise cornerstone cannot guard a single NBA 4 or 5 man to man. His issues guarding the screen-roll have been documented by Geoff Lepper over at 48minutes.net. Biedrins ranked as the worst Warrior this season on the plus/minus stat: -182 [Talking Points]. Expect a ton of excuses for his poor D this season in the comments from the Biedrins fanboys. I don't expect many Biedrins votes for WDWY, but any made make plenty of sense.
Jamal Crawford- Don't get me wrong I love JC as much as the next delusional Dubs fan (actually probably more so), but it's pretty laughable how bad he looks on D. I can't tell if the mistakes he makes on the defensive side of the ball are because of a lack of effort or because his coaches never made him take Defense 101. I can't fault anyone who awards Crawford with this year's WDWY.
Monta Ellis- Moped Ellis gets my vote. I'll pass the mic to ESPN's John Hollinger for this one:
Monta Ellis (Oakland, CA): Hey Eastcoast media bias! Anyone notice the emerging superstar coming out of the Bay?
John Hollinger: Who -- Monta, or the guy he's guarding?
Stephen Jackson- Captain Jack is actually a stellar defender when he's surrounded by vets like WE BELIEVE. He still had his moments this past season, but with destruction of BoomRich he was improperly cast as the 2nd, then 1st offensive option for this team which took its toll on his defensive energy. The constant yelling at refs and not getting back on D was frustrating as well. I'd be surprised if Jack got more than 1% of the vote though.
Rob Kurz- To tell you the truth I really didn't walk away from this season with any real sort of impression of how good or bad this rook's was, so I'll pass the mic to the GSoM community. Anyone who votes for Kurz as the WDWY is just being mean.
Corey Maggette- How does a guy built like a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle (and that's a compliment), not play like an enforcer on D? Master Splinter would be very disappointed to see such poor defensive effort from a vet in phenomenal shape.
Anthony Morrow- Honestly I thought he played decent D for a rookie. Like Azubuike he doesn't have the raw foot speed and can get beat off the dribble, but overall I thought Morrow tried hard on this side of the ball and added some scrappiness to a team defense filled with um... crappy-ness.
Anthony Randolph- The blocks were there (1.2 in under 18min) and they were mighty impressive and fun to watch. But as far as holding position and rotating, AR's D leaves a lot to be desired. He's was a rookie and rookies tend to struggle on defense, so I'm willing to give him a pass.
Ronny Turiaf- GSoMer RomesDavidWood can be heard in the people's section of the Roaracle known as section 109 screaming "Tur-i-af is a... BEEEAAAST." No doubt. Sure Ronny's defensive rebounding and his foul rate was far from impressive, but anyone who votes for Turiaf for WDWY deserves to have their voting rights revoked in all future Polling GSoMs.
C.J. Watson- Well he resembles Monta on defense. KBLX provides plenty of smooth R&B, but ZERO resistance to opposing penetrating guards.
Brandan Wright- Don't let those pretty Inspector Gadget swats fool you, this second year player is absolutely lost on D. It's the forward-version of Jamal Crawford's defensive positioning.
If I had to rank them, here's how I would list the Worst Defensive Warriors of the Year. (Seriously this was a tough list to come up because they were just that bad.)
- Monta Ellis- See Hollinger's words above. Unless he's moved in a blockbuster trade, Monta should be topping this list for years to come.
- C.J. Watson- Maybe that type of D works in the NBDL?
- Jamal Crawford- The D was so bad it was funny.
- Andris Biedrins- Charmin' soft D that would make even the biggest Troy Murphy fan proud.
- Brandan Wright- He's worse than Biedrins, but he barely played (for good reason).
106 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Consider me a fanboy or not...
but Biedrins certainly wasn’t the problem of the Warriors’ D. His position D might not be stellar but “cannot defend any 4 or 5” is simply ridicolous.
You are on some kind of hatespree. Might have had a bad night or the wrong food.
However I totally agree on your rage about Crawford and Monta. Those two are simply not doing anything and show not a minimum of defensive pride. And this lack of defensive pride makes the character of the team.
btw: Simply making everybody who defends Biedrins a “fanboy” is certainly not a good way to create a enjoyable discussion. You are quite bitter…..
by TheGerman on May 18, 2009 6:21 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
Please explain to me the Warrior killer nights by the likes of Marcin Gortat and the worst season plus/minus. Tim Kawakami’s spot on:
ANDRIS BIEDRINS/
Age: 23.
Contract status: Signed for five more years, at $9M per, through 2013-14, his option for the last season.
Season plus/minus: NEGATIVE 182
Surprisingly bad number; the worst on the team. Biedrins had a NEGATIVE .110 per-minute total, significantly worse than the team average.
Other notable stats: 11.9 points per game, 11.2 rebounds, 2.0 assists, all career highs. Played in 62 games, his lowest total since his rookie season.
Peripheral stats: Bad things happened when Biedrins was on the floor this season, and I can’t completely explain it. One explanation: Turiaf was good. Another: Biedrins struggled and took the Warriors’ offensive with him (4 points worse per 100 possessions) .
They were 9-11 in games he didn’t play, 20-42 in games he did play.
Grade: C-.
Summary: On the surface, this was another decent growth season for Biedrins, with the only noticeable minus his increased uncertainty on offense (career high 1.8 TOs).
But those peripherals and the ongoing ankle problems aren’t sunny signs. He’s still young enough to make me think this was just an odd season, but another season like this and that $11M per is going to look awful.
Name the 4’s and 5’s he shut down for an entire game this season or whose lives he made extra hard. There’s NONE.
I think you’re confusing “rage” with humor. This roster, their defense, this past season, this entire franchise, etc is one big joke.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions
i'll give biedrins a pass
Have a viable 4 play next to him (not sg’s or sf’s) and see how the D adjusts.
Why the kiddie treatment?
That still doesn’t explain the inability to guard opposing 4’s and 5’s one-on-one or those other poor stats that Tim threw out- all evidence that this team played better with Biedrins out and Turiaf in.
Why the kiddie treatment? No one else on this team gets that but Biedrins. It’s reminiscent of the Dunleavy fanboys.
You could say Monta gets a pass because he didn’t have a legit PG playing next to him. Or that Jamal Crawford gets a pass because there wasn’t a great defending guard next to him.
But you wouldn’t say that.
There’s a double standard in how some fans analyze Biedrins’ game compared to the others.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions
i'm not a biedrins fan boy.
I actually wouldnt mind trading him for right peice. But its really hard to argue turiaf is a better post defend. Better BLOCKER yes. But how many second chance points do we give up casuse turiaf is out of position to rebound.
also consider biedrins guarding duncan….. then turiaf comes in on say… oberto. Kind of a big difference.
But its really hard to argue turiaf is a better post defend.
no it isn’t. Turiaf is a much better post defender. i think you’re confusing post defense with rebounding position (which falls under the broader category of position defense).
post defense is when the offensive player post’s up. the biggest key in post defense is fighting for position prior to the opponent catching the ball. often when AB, AR, BW are playing post d, the opposing player is catching the ball way too close to the hoop.
after the catch, Turiaf is best at keeping his body at an angle in between the player and the hoop. often the others guys get beat by a step or give the offensive player an angle. Ronny is great at forcing the opposition to shoot over him.
Ronny’s biggest weakness on defense is he’s undisciplined. he’s overanxious in giving help. in football, he’d be like a defender on the weakside who needs to stay in his zone in case there is a cutback or a reverse, but he’s so anxious to help his teammates that he leaves the spot he’s supposed to be in. at the center position, this often leads to the opposition getting offensive rebounds.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Turiaf’s biggest weakness on D is that he is a poor rebounder and this means too manz second chance points allowed. It is exceptionallz difficult to get defensive stops without a defensive rebound. It requires a turnover if zou are not rebouding well and thus separating rebounding from defense isn’t logical. It is unlikelz that Turiaf will ever be a better rebounder. It is one of those things plazers just don’t improve that often.
The team defensive efficiencz were ridiculouslz close for Turiaf and Biedrins, I doubt a statisticallz significant difference. Turiaf was the better man defender, but his rebounding created a team level liabilitz. Biedrins anchored the boards better, something absolutelz necessarz for solid defense, but could be abused inside. Near identical results. The kez difference between the two plazers was on offense, where things went better when Turiaf was in. Given that the team lacked the sort of ball movement Baron brought the zear before and Turiaf is a much better distributor, I am not particularlz surprised. Turiaf certainlz did not score as much or as efficientlz, but the numbers were rather different at the team level.
For the previous two zears, things were better with Biedrins than without him, significantlz so. It is still possible that we just got a poor sample this zear given how everzthing in general went south. If the split continues though next zear, then it is time to look at it as a bigger problem.
(Still in Germanz and still too layz to fix the swapped z and y kezs)
Please explain to me the Warrior killer nights by the likes of Marcin Gortat and the worst season plus/minus.
Gortat’s actually a pretty good player, good enough to start on more than half the teams in the league, so I don’t think that punchline really works.
I’d agree that Biedrins didn’t have a great season defensively… the plus-minus numbers are a bit troubling. However, to call him a downright terrible defender, you have to ignore
1) two previous seasons of stellar plus-minus numbers
2) 7.6 defensive rebounds (sixth in the league), 1.5 blocks (sixteenth in the league) and 1.0 steals a game
3) the fact that we had some of the worst perimeter defense in league history
I’m not willing to ignore those three things. Biedrins did struggle at times, but he wasn’t one of the five worst defenders on the team last season, and it’s myopic at best to lay the blame at his feet.
by onlxn on May 18, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
On Gortat- Give me a break. For a supposed Top 5 center, a bench player like Gortat should not come in and dominate you in your house, especially when Dwight Howard is sitting out. It comes down to pride. Biedrins is a far superior athelete to Gortat- there’s no excuse. We’ve seen this before with the likes of Josh Boone last season and Andray Blatche this season. These are not unworldly players, yet they’ve dominated the Warriors.
Biedrins had a TERRIBLE season defensively. Is he a terrible defender? I think so. The past 2 seasons he has shown ZERO ability to man up against a legit 4 or 5. He doesn’t give these guys the slightest problem. Do you think for a second opposing teams fear Biedrins or plan around what he can do in the paint?
His poor rotating D on the screen and rolls- a fundamental aspect of NBA basketball isn’t going to cut it. Biedrins poor defensive positioning isn’t going to cut it for a “franchise cornerstone”. I agree the perimeter defense on this team is horrendous (I’ve been saying that for years), but those two aren’t products of his teammates. I’m not impressed by his weakside D and his inability to protect the rim from penetrating guards and wings, but I’d be willing to stomach it if his one-on-on D was at least adequate.
His defensive rebounding and overall rebounding with the Warriors the past 3 seasons have been excellent if not superior. No one’s saying they aren’t and no one’s understating the importance of rebounding on wins. BUT we’ve seen that before with Troy Murphy (who by the way finished with a far more impressive PT and Rebound total than Biedrins). Just like Murph, I fear a disturbing trend— Big Money → Mo Softness
Again Biedrins not the most horrific defender on a horrific defensive team, but his defensive intensity and IQ this past season was horrible.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
now you have great points and evidence, but the conclusion doesn’t follow. yes, he just signed a big contract and his defensive stats have slipped, but i certainly don’t see that as a sign of “softness”. He is obviously committed to improving his game and in the mold of nellie has solidified the skills that he needs in order to improve other aspects of his game. this explains the consistently strong numbers in other statistical categories. i agree he has limitations but i personally feel you exaggerate them. I never felt like biedrins was being abused by other 4’s and 5’s. Sure he doesn’ t abuse anyone himself, but he is still one of the opponent’s top considerations in their game plan. we saw it during the second quarter of the season especially when players were definitely crowding him on rebounds. the fact is, biedrins is in the top 5 active centers.
On Gortat- Give me a break. For a supposed Top 5 center, a bench player like Gortat should not come in and dominate you in your house, especially when Dwight Howard is sitting out. It comes down to pride. Biedrins is a far superior athelete to Gortat- there’s no excuse. We’ve seen this before with the likes of Josh Boone last season and Andray Blatche this season. These are not unworldly players, yet they’ve dominated the Warriors.
A couple points.
1) You and I evaluate players differently. You see that Gortat is a bench player and figure that a highly paid starter should naturally dominate him. I look at Gortat’s production and figure that he’s a good player, and thus am not particularly bothered if he has success against another good player. We won’t agree on this point, but acknowledge that your perspective is not the only valid way to look at it.
2) I’m not sure what you mean by the fact that Biedrins is a “far superior athlete” to Gortat. Can he run faster? Yes. Is Gortat stronger and bulkier? Yes. Both traits have their advantages at the center position. Nothing about the physical skills of the two players tells me that Biedrins should naturally dominate Gortat ten times out of ten.
3) You claim that Gortat “dominated” Biedrins in Oracle. Gortat started in place of the injured Howard and had a successful game, scoring 16 points on 13 shots, grabbing thirteen rebounds and blocking three shots. Gortat was very good in that game. Biedrins was better. Biedrins scored 23 points on twelve shots, grabbed nine rebounds and blocked two shots, and he had only one foul to Gortat’s five. Gortat, playing against Biedrins, had the worst plus-minus in that game of any Orlando player. Biedrins outplayed Gortat. We didn’t lose that game because BIEDRINS LACKS PRIDE; we lost that game because Jamal and CJ let Jameer Nelson do literally anything he wanted on offense.
Josh Boone? Yeah, he had a big game in November, racking up 17 and 14 against us. Again, Biedrins was better. Biedrins scored six more points on four fewer shots, grabbed eleven rebounds of his own, and behind Biedrins, we won the game. Blatche? I have no excuse for Biedrins in that game; he and every other Warrior was completely horrible all around. But Blatche did a lot of his damage against Turiaf and Wright in that game, and he also did most of his damage from twelve feet and farther. He was not muscling Biedrins inside… he was killing him from distance.
Biedrins had a TERRIBLE season defensively. Is he a terrible defender? I think so. The past 2 seasons he has shown ZERO ability to man up against a legit 4 or 5. He doesn’t give these guys the slightest problem. Do you think for a second opposing teams fear Biedrins or plan around what he can do in the paint?
I don’t think they fear him, no. Biedrins is not a big-impact defender, and was worse than usual this year. But he gets a boatload of rebounds, blocks shots and grabs an impressive number of steals for a big man. Those are all very good things. Do they completely negate his struggles with the screen and roll? Of course not. But his struggles with the screen and roll don’t completely negate them, either.
His poor rotating D on the screen and rolls- a fundamental aspect of NBA basketball isn’t going to cut it.
Totally agree with this. Whether it was health issues, coaching mistakes or sheer apathy, he was far worse defending these than he’d been in previous years. That needs to change.
Biedrins poor defensive positioning isn’t going to cut it for a "franchise cornerstone". I agree the perimeter defense on this team is horrendous (I’ve been saying that for years), but those two aren’t products of his teammates. I’m not impressed by his weakside D and his inability to protect the rim from penetrating guards and wings, but I’d be willing to stomach it if his one-on-on D was at least adequate.
Here we disagree. I think his one-on-one D was adequate this season — no better than adequate, but adequate. That’s based both on the 50+ games I watched this year and the numbers. A number of nondescript big men did have big rebounding games against Biedrins — Josh Boone, Drew Gooden, Andray Blatche, Joakim Noah and others — but, lest we forget, we gave up more total rebounds last year than any team has in several years. And while there’s plenty of blame to go around for that, it strikes me that the guy who doesn’t deserve much blame is the one elite rebounder on the team (though Randolph looks to be joining Biedrins in that camp).
Did opposing centers score a lot on Biedrins? Not really. In Biedrins’ 62 games, he gave up 30 points to an opposing center five times: one game each from Yao, Pau, Duncan, Brad Miller and (oy) David Lee. Most of the time he gave up fewer than 20. In general, centers had roughly average offensive performances against Biedrins. I’d call that pretty much the definition of “adequate” one-on-one defense.
Did certain types of players have bigger success against Biedrins than others? Absolutely, but it’s not the ones you might think. It was the good shooters that Beans struggled against. Andray Blatche had two good games against him, based primarily on shooting jumpers; Okur did fairly well against him, and Bargnani even had a big game against Biedrins. On the other hand, Biedrins did pretty well against muscle guys… Shaq never went off on him, Howard played poorly in their one encounter, and bangers like Noah and Jermaine O’Neal were downright terrible against Biedrins.
Floor spacing is Biedrins’s problem, both in the sense that he’s bad at defending the screen & roll (his fault) and in the sense that his outsized defensive responsibilities require him to stay near the hoop to guard the rim and grab rebounds (not his fault). This is a genuine and big problem, one that Biedrins and the team need to solve if we’re going to get competitive again. But it is not the alpha and omega of defense. There are many other aspects to defending the center position well, and Biedrins rates excellently in most of them.
His defensive rebounding and overall rebounding with the Warriors the past 3 seasons have been excellent if not superior. No one’s saying they aren’t and no one’s understating the importance of rebounding on wins. BUT we’ve seen that before with Troy Murphy (who by the way finished with a far more impressive PT and Rebound total than Biedrins). Just like Murph, I fear a disturbing trend— Big Money → Mo Softness
I think we have dark visions of Troy Murphy in our heads when Biedrins struggles defensively, but I don’t think the downside here is nearly that big. For one thing, Biedrins is a far more active defender than Murphy, as he racks up many more blocks and steals. For another, Biedrins is a more reliably good rebounder than Murphy, whose numbers have gone up and down rather sharply over the years. Finally, Biedrins is the more efficient offensive player, even with Murphy’s new three-point stylings.
It’s true that, like Murphy, his defense isn’t his calling card, and that’s hard to square with most people’s visions of a good big man. But Biedrins is a better player than Murphy, and is more surely an asset than Murphy was.
Again Biedrins not the most horrific defender on a horrific defensive team, but his defensive intensity and IQ this past season was horrible.
I consider grabbing rebounds part of defensive IQ, so there’s no way I could call him “horrible” on that front. I’d use the word “disappointing”. In one of the most unenviable defensive positions in the league — doing all the rebounding and rim-guarding for a tiny, listlessly coached team — Biedrins struggled. I’d give him a C for defense for the year, and he needs to be better than that for us to succeed in the future. But it sucked to be Andris Biedrins on defense this year. Next year, with better health and Randolph (hopefully) beside him, I’d expect better results.
by onlxn on May 18, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 7 recs
Nice well-written points. I appreciate the response. Definitely deserving of a Rec. I think we agree on far more than we disagree about.
I’ll have to go back and dig up more games. On the Gortat game- I don’t see an excuse for that happening from a supposed top 5 center and cornerstone of this franchise. He shouldn’t be giving up those kind of numbers to Gortat- ever. Jamal and Cj let an All-Star go off. Biedrins let a bench player go off when he should have shut him down. It was a chance to thoroughly dominate without their superstar All-Star center and DPOY Dwight Howard out, but he didn’t.
Surrendering a 30 point game to a later stage Brad Miller and to David Lee is not acceptable.
Overall I’d give Biedrins a D- for his defense this year and most of the team an F.
Next year- Having Randolph a poor position defender is his one right isn’t going to solve Biedrins’ issue there. There was nothing adequate about his D there. I doubt health is really the issue here since even when he was healthy he didn’t play good man D on 4’s and 5’s.
Hopefully I’m wrong.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions
a couple things
you keep referring to biedrins as a “supposed top 5 center” and a “franchise cornerstone” and i think that this is a misrepresentation of the stance of most posters who like biedrins and what he does for this franchise.
is he a top 5 center? probably not. i like biedrins’ game as much as anyone, but the concerns about his d almost certainly knock him out of that group. he’s probably not much worse than the 5th best center in the nba, though. off the top of my head, we’ve got howard, yao, duncan, al jefferson (someone who is actually miles worse than biedrins on the defensive end, but his ability to carry the team in scoring while still rebounding quite well gives him the edge over andris), shaq, and pao gasol who are clearly better players who played a lot of time at the center (please save the remarks about duncan, jefferson and gasol not being “natural” centers, i don’t care what their natural position is, i care about where they played their minutes this year). it is completely fair to put biedrins in the next tier down from them. that’s a very good tier to be in. nene, camby, bynum when healthy, and andris seem to comprise that group, though it’s possible i’m leaving someone out. those guys are all productive players who do a lot of good things for their teams. they aren’t dominant and aren’t asked to be.
sometimes a good player will have a good game against guys on this tier. brad miller might be getting old, but he’s capable of scoring a lot of points and can hit midrange jumpers, something that is problematic if your center is never allowed to leave the painted area due to terrible perimeter d and having no one to help with the rebounding duties. if you can say that he gave up only 5 30 point games this year, do you really want to call him an atrocious defender? or do you want to say that he had a few bad games against capable players? i’d say the latter, and that’s fine considering he is not here to be our franchise player.
if andris biedrins is the best player on your team, you have a bad team. pure and simple. he is probably “a” cornerstone of this franchise, in that he is signed to a reasonable, long-term deal that will allow him to continue to be one of the four best players on the team for years to come. if andris biedrins is the 3rd best player on your team, your team could very well be quite good. it depends on who the 2 best players are.
sadly last year, andris biedrins was probably the best player on the team going into the season, which is why the team was so bad. minus monta for most of the year and with jack, buike, and morrow as the only guys who could compete for that title, it’s no wonder the team sucked. i’m not saying he had the best year, but given his track record, going into the year, if you looked at what the guys had done in recent seasons, you’d have guessed biedrins was our best player or at least in the top two. jack is a leader, but he’s another guy who should be about the 3rd/4th best player on a good team and we were going into a season with those two as our best and second best players, the guys we expected to carry the load. that is terrible news if you want to win games. both of those guys can be very valuable pieces on good teams, but to call out everyone who says that he’s the “cornerstone” seems to assume that there are people who think that andris should lead this team to glory. if there are people who think that, please stand up, because i’d like to hear the reasons. andris is a nice player who you seem to be attacking on the grounds that some people think that he’s a superstar or that he should be a superstar and i just don’t know who is making those claims. let him be our 3rd best player and save the “cornerstone” jabs for guys who people actually want to build the team around.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on May 18, 2009 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
+1000
I’d put Biedrins at around the 8th-9th-best center in the league. Mocking him for not being the 3rd-best center in the league is sorta pointless… nobody’s saying he is, and he’s not paid as though he is. He is not an elite defender, not a versatile scorer, not a guy who can lead you to the playoffs by his lonesome. But he’s a good player, a significantly above-average center on a good contract, a guy who could still improve. Shouldn’t we be happy with that from a #11 pick? Is this really the part of the roster worth worrying about?
I think we agree on far more than we disagree about.
Yep, I think that’s true. I think we both agree, as would most, that Biedrins does a number of things very well on defense and a number of things very poorly. He’s definitely a mixed bag. However, I have to quibble with some of your counterpoints.
Jamal and Cj let an All-Star go off. Biedrins let a bench player go off when he should have shut him down.
Terms like “All-Star” and “bench player” are too vague to be analytically useful. “All-Star” can refer to anyone from Lebron James (a historically great player) to Allen Iverson (at this point, a truly mediocre, not at all good player); “bench player” can refer to anyone from Paul Millsap (extremely good player) to Rob Kurz (a joke of a player). For your sentence to have any merit, we need to look at 1) exactly how good this “All-Star” and “bench player” are, and 2) exactly how well they did against their respective Warrior opponents.
Jameer Nelson has always been a pretty good and underrated player, but if you called him “an All-Star” a year ago, you’d have been laughed at. His claim to that label is based solely on this season. And let’s be clear — he was really, really good, and deserving of the selection. But he played in only 42 games, and two of his very best — one of the two highest-scoring games of his career and the most-efficient scoring game of his career — came against Messrs. Crawford and Watson. You pull those two games out of his season, and he goes from 16.7 points on 50.3% shooting for the year to 16.2 points on 49.3% shooting for the year, numbers that, fairly or not, would’ve made him a much bigger longshot for an All-Star nod.
So a better way of putting “Jamal and Cj let an All-Star go off” would be, “Against Jamal and CJ, a very good player had two of his best games of the year.”
You call Gortat a “bench player”. Gortat is, in fact, the best backup center in the NBA, an efficient scorer and a monstrous rebounder… the only things keeping him back from stardom are a high foul rate (which most young bigs correct after a year or two) and Dwight Howard. On another team, he’d be a double-double machine and, frankly, a pretty close statistical match for Biedrins. He had a big game against Biedrins, but guess what? He just about always had big games when given the minutes. Two weeks after the game against us, he went for 14 and 9 against the Bulls in 19 minutes, and mauled them even worse later in the year. A week after that first Bulls game, he grabbed 11 rebounds against Al Horford in 21 minutes. A couple weeks later, he scored eight points (on three shots) and grabbed nine boards in 13 minutes against Emeka Okafor. He played 39 combined minutes in two games against the Bucks shortly after and went for 20 points on twelve shots and grabbed 19 rebounds. And in case you didn’t notice, Gortat went for 11 points, 15 boards and four blocks in the playoffs a couple weeks ago. The guy isn’t a one-game wonder; he produces whenever he’s given the chance.
So a better way of putting “Biedrins let a bench player go off when he should have shut him down” would be, “Against Biedrins, a good player had one of his best games of the year.” Yes, Nelson is better than Gortat… but then his performances against the Warriors were better, too. The gaudy stat in Gortat’s game against us is the 13 rebounds, which is hard to pin on Andris, since he was the only Warrior who held his own in that category.
There’s just no fire under all this smoke. Marcin Gortat is a pretty good player, and it’s no crime to give up a good game to him, especially if you respond with a better one. To act like that one game was indicative of Biedrins’s crappiness is to misunderstand the value of Gortat, the value of Biedrins, the context of team rebounding and the importance of sample size. You may not like Biedrins, but this is grasping at straws.
Surrendering a 30 point game to a later stage Brad Miller and to David Lee is not acceptable.
Well, it sure ain’t great… both those games made me tear my hair out.
But is giving up 31 points to Andrea Bargnani acceptable? Because Joakim Noah and Tyrus Thomas did that. Are they “unacceptable” defenders? Jameer Nelson gave up 31 points to Eddie House… does he suck because of that one game? Should Celtic fans run Paul Pierce out of town for giving up 38 points to John Salmons, or 31 points to Wilson Chandler? Should Kobe’s year be defined by the night he gave up 31 to Rasual Butler? Is K-Mart a worthless defender because he gave up 32 and 11 to Ike friggin’ Diogu?
No. It doesn’t work like that. You don’t define players by their worst moments… you define players by the sum of their achievements. Biedrins had a number of very bad defensive games this year, but unlike most Warriors, he had a number of good defensive games as well, outmuscling and outplaying a good number of bigs. Overall, his season was a mixed bag.
Next year- Having Randolph a poor position defender is his one right isn’t going to solve Biedrins’ issue there. There was nothing adequate about his D there. I doubt health is really the issue here since even when he was healthy he didn’t play good man D on 4’s and 5’s.
I’m not totally sold on the idea that Randolph is a poor position defender… I can buy that his positioning is bad, but he seems to have the length and athleticism to get away with it. As for your restatement of Biedrins’s position D as “inadequate”, all I can tell you is that the evidence says otherwise. You may think the evidence is the six worst Biedrins games you can find, but I’ll take all 62 of his games to make my assessment. And there’s plenty of good mixed in with the bad.
by onlxn on May 18, 2009 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I give you a ton of credit for the Gortat analysis, but you’re grasping at straws (in a very verbose way) if you think that’s all I’m basing my analysis of Biedrins’ porous defense on.
If there isn’t all that much difference between Biedrins and a bench player like Gortat, then why does Biedrins merit such a big paycheck? Why does he merit so much praise as a young building block for this team? It’s easy to say now that Biedrins is not an elite player, but not too long ago people in this very community were painting him as an up and coming untouchable 20-10 big man and a nice defender. He is none of the above.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions
the question isn’t about why biedrins warrants a big paycheck, because for a young big as capable as he is, that contract is a steal. i don’t care if he’s supposedly plateaued. we can at least say that he’s young enough to not start to decline anytime soon. gortat will get a very comparable paycheck this offseason. he’s a very good player, i don’t see why the debate should be centered around their contracts or whether or not they need to back up dwight howard.
the problem with your complaints about biedrins is that if you are basing them off what people used to think, they are dated. no one expects him to be a beast; he won’t be. let him be our very productive top 10 center. there’s really no reason to complain about that.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
I think the signing was a mistake, but I’ll get into that later.
the problem with your complaints about biedrins is that if you are basing them off what people used to think, they are dated. no one expects him to be a beast; he won’t be.
You could be right.
let him be our very productive top 10 center. there’s really no reason to complain about that.
I could complain that it’s a meaningless distinction? Where’s Skeptic when you need him?
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions
which is meaningless, that he’s a top ten center or that he’s very productive? i’ll grant you that “top ten” might not be all that helpful in terms of what the guy actually does on the court, but a rebounding force who plays within himself and scores efficiently (even if not in bunches) is a useful cog on this team and will continue to be productive for the next 5 years. if he doesn’t get better, he still produces well. he’s not dwight howard, but he’s better than what most teams have.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by the way, i’d be interested to see the reasons you think biedrins isn’t worth the contract he’s got. i know that if you made it a front page post you’d get all sorts of angry replies about you having a vendetta against him or whatever, but if you’ve got reasons to say that $9M a year over 6 years for an solid young center is too much money, i’d love to hear them.
that sounds a little sarcastic, but i don’t mean it to be. i’d like to really get into what your problem with that deal is, because i don’t see how it’s bad. you are perfectly capable of making intelligent points and i’d like to hear them on that issue. mostly because even if i agreed that biedrins is a terrible defender (which i don’t, especially considering how important rebounding is to defense), the strengths in his game alone are worth his pricetag. do it up at some point.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on May 18, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
you are perfectly capable of making intelligent points
HIGHLY debatable. Haha
I’ll try to incorporate into my next Mullin Myths piece.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 19, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
If there isn’t all that much difference between Biedrins and a bench player like Gortat, then why does Biedrins merit such a big paycheck?
OY, you’re nothing if not stubborn. The description “bench player” is meaningless in terms of actual value. Gortat is a very good player, a player who will make, and deserve, tens of millions of dollars very soon. It is not an insult to Andris to say that they’re comparable.
Why does he merit so much praise as a young building block for this team?
I dunno… because he is a good young building block for this team?
Biedrins has played meaningful minutes for three seasons. In the first season, we improved by ten games and made the playoffs… he was our leading rebounder, leading shot-blocker and most efficient scorer. The next season, we improved by six more games… again, Andris was our leading rebounder, leading shot-blocker and most efficient scorer. This season, we fell off a cliff, but that didn’t have much to do with Andris. Yes, his defense took a step backward, but he still provided boatloads of rebounds and continued to score efficiently.
Did he lead us to success in the absence of Baron, general absence of Monta and presence of Crawford and misguided smallball? No. But who ever said he would? Tayshaun Prince wouldn’t have led the Pistons to the playoffs without Chauncey and ‘Sheed all these years… he’s a complementary player, not a star. That doesn’t mean Tayshaun Prince isn’t a very good, useful player. He is. And so is Andris.
It’s easy to say now that Biedrins is not an elite player, but not too long ago people in this very community were painting him as an up and coming untouchable 20-10 big man and a nice defender.
Who on GSOM, whose opinion you take seriously, contended that Andris was going to be an “untouchable 20-10 big man”? I haven’t seen any regulars make that claim, for the simple reason that it’s crazy. Andris has never shown that potential… why should he be blamed for that, just because some random poster was foolish enough to think that he did? There are occasional posters who think we should start Rob Kurz. Do we all need to sit around and hash out why Rob Kurz doesn’t have that kind of potential?
We took Andris Biedrins with the eleventh pick in the draft… when his rookie contract was up, we signed him to an extension that gives him nine million a year for six years. Nothing about that screams “superstar”… it all screams “really useful player”. You have established that he is not a superstar — something on which we all agree — but do you actually think that Andris Biedrins is not a really useful player?
by onlxn on May 18, 2009 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I would paz the sort of monez that we are giving to Biedrins for Gortat and in a few zears he will probablz be paid accordinglz. It is the going rate for a qualitz center. I do not think zou can get bz without one and be a good team, though obviouslz it is not alone sufficient. While we had better luck this zear with Turiaf, Turiaf’s rebounding will never allow him to be a full time center on a team that wants to plaz solid defense. He will alwazs be a defensive liabilitz since he does not close out enough missed shots.
When the team plazed well for two zears, thez plazed better with Biedrins. When thez plazed poorlz this last season, thez were worse with Biedrins in.
Gortat plazed exceptionallz well all last season. It was onlz that he is on Howard’s team that he had limited PT. Gortat was an unknown last season. I think this flavors the opinion, that somehow he should not be good. He is good. His game against us was one of his better games, but it was not a case of a guz who otherwise could not plaz becoming superhuman.
My biggest problem with Kawakami's analysis
Is that he’s using raw +/- stats. That’s like judging a pitcher based on wins and losses. There’s no adjustment for the fact minutes played, and the four other players on the floor. This isn’t just about Biedrins, but every point Kawakami makes his “bad defensive players’” articles. Raw +/- stats are (mostly) worthless when talking about individual players, and the best models for making adjusted +/- stats are made by staticians who are quickly hired by NBA teams (or smart NBA teams like the Rockets, Blazers, and Thunder).
Also of note, raw +/- stats are awesome when judging 5 man units. Too bad the Warriors didn’t have a single 5 man unit that totaled 100 minutes (http://www.82games.com/0809/0809GSW2.HTM), thanks to (mostly) injuries and (less but still counts) Nelson’s constant line up juggling.
by philthiest on May 18, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Biedrins Gets Screwed......
I don’t know of any other player in the NBA that gets called for fouls when they aren’t. He gets great position defensively an offensive player goes into his space and Biedrins hands are straight up. Instead of being a no call on a missed shot it’s called a foul on Biedrins, which in reality hurts Biedrins because he can no longer be aggressive on defense.
GSoM - was the worst defender of the 2008-2009 Golden State Warriors...
of any other major blog site – hands down!
by streetballer on May 19, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Haha
That’s pretty good. It was a pretty hard team to defend.
Thing 2
by olympicmike on May 19, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
GSoM - with many new bloggers and albeit some of the old dogs...
took a turn for the slime – moving away from benign comments and constructive views, bypassing sarcasm and falling straight into the malignancies that afflict bandwagoners.
by streetballer on May 19, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions
This poll is missing two choices to complete the roster
Jermareo Davidson and Anthony Randolph
Thanks
Just added those. Quite an IQ I must say.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 18, 2009 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Naw, I just got lucky
I was wondering how many people might pick Randolph as the worst defender and didn’t see his name up there. Then I counted up and found 2 missing.
by IQofaWarrior on May 18, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
unfortunately, that’s the one guy who is not going anywhere. larry riley isn’t firing him. rowell isn’t firing him… he may let his contract run out eventually, but he sure as hell isn’t firing him.
since nellie isn’t going to demand defensive effort, we really need a veteran nba star who demands it from his teammates (0.1% chance of that happening) or to trade 75% of the guys who play heavy minutes for guys who actually are good defenders.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I've seen some evidence of team defensive accountability from the coaching staff
while I was watching Brandan Wright late in the season. I remember on one occasion, the entire coaching staff yelled at Wright from the bench because he didn’t rotate over to help because Turiaf got blocked out. Soon after that, Wright got pulled out. I’ve chronicled that in the open thread and recap at the time because everyone always wonders why Wright gets pulled out.
I think the coaching staff DOES push team defense, rotation, and weak side help on the players. The problem I have is whether the staff enforces it on everyone. On a few occasions, I remember seeing Maggette NOT rotating to help from the weak side, yet he doesn’t get yanked out. Why not???
The other problem, as you mentioned, is whether the players hold each other accountable on defense in stopping their man or giving help. I remember Nellie once saying on the radio that during one halftime, Jack was yelling “Damn, I can’t guard EVERYONE out there!” Jack by himself isn’t enough to push everyone to play defense. Who else out there want to push everyone to play defense???
by IQofaWarrior on May 18, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
That’s the weird thing… the coaching staff seems to have strict defensive standards, but only for Brandan Wright. He got pulled at least seven or eight times that I can remember for defensive miscues, but nobody else ever did, and it’s not like he was the main culprit out there.
I remember Nellie once saying on the radio that during one halftime, Jack was yelling "Damn, I can’t guard EVERYONE out there!" Jack by himself isn’t enough to push everyone to play defense.
I actually don’t think he did nearly enough pushing. Jack’s ideal role on this team is as the defensive leader and disciplinarian… instead he spent the year gunning, passing into traffic and complaining about calls. It’s somewhat forgivable because it seems that Nellie, for some reason, wanted Jack to be doing that, but Jack was by no means the leader he could’ve been. With Monta taking the offensive reins, I’m hoping Jack will re-dedicate himself to defense, and to asking more of his teammates on defense. That’d do a lot more for us than a lot of personnel moves we could make.
"but only for Brandan Wright"
That was what drove me nuts. Since we’re not with the Warriors in the locker room or during practice, we can only guess as to what rules the coaching staff had established for players. And it was very hard to figure out exactly what the rules are and what mistakes cause a player to get completely yanked out.
It’s possible that there are different rules for different players at different parts of the floor, so maybe that’s why it’s so hard to figure them out from an outsider’s perspective.
Note that Marco also suffered the yank at least once, I think it was because his man was left completely free for an uncovered fast break layup.
“With Monta taking the offensive reins, I’m hoping Jack will re-dedicate himself to defense”
Let’s hope so. Jack handling the ball less means fewer turnovers, fewer arguing with the refs, and more energy to lead everyone else to play defense.
by IQofaWarrior on May 18, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
That’s the weird thing… the coaching staff seems to have strict defensive standards, but only for Brandan Wright.
You know I pretty much agree with you about Wright, but to be fair Marco was also pulled early on for defensive miscues. I noticed that when he failed to close out on shooters (he had a tendency to sag off and play the passing lanes) he would get pulled. He did end up correcting that habit for the most part though.
It seems like Nellie will develop a pet peeve with younger players and harp on them until they correct that single issue, sometimes entirely ignoring other problems (or positives) with their game. With Marco it was closing out on shooters, with Wright it was blocking out for defensive rebounds, and let’s not forget that he yanked Randolph plenty of times early on too.
I think that Wright has gotten the worst of it, but it could just be that his problem (poor defensive rebounding) is the hardest to correct. Marco and AR both showed improvement and had their playing time increase because of it (or at least they didn’t get the hook suddenly as often).
Thing 2
by olympicmike on May 18, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions
It’s true… Marco got pulled for defensive lapses, too. I mainly remember Randolph being pulled for general crappiness, but you may be right that defensive mistakes were the triggers.
"general crappiness"
Yeah, you may be right. My point was more that Nelson will pick an issue, for AR I think it may have been turnovers(he was doing so many things wrong early in the year that it’s hard to tell), and ride them until they improve that issue. I think that most of Wright’s defensive miscues involved defensive rebounding position.
Thing 2
Yep, totally agree.
It’s a weird problem for a young player to have; even all of us dorks on this board were probably taught to box out somewhere along the line. It may been that Wright’s freaky length made him such a good natural defensive rebounder that he never really needed to focus on proper positioning till now. Here’s hoping he gets a little better at it, because it’s the only significant hole in his game.
You're kidding right?
There were plenty of times other players on the team were taken out for their lack of defense. Anthony Randolph didn’t even get too play because he wasn’t playing defense. So, yeah! There you go.
you’re right. nellie & co. do preach it to the youngsters.
(in regards to your last paragraph) yeah. when Baron was here and felt like playing defense, that’s when the W’s were at their best defensively. they need another defensive leader who has the ear of the young guys.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions
A few points:
1. The poll would probably be more substantial if we only included heavy rotation players. I don’t think anyone really cares if Rob Kurz is the worst defensive player… tho if its a starter or one of the first guys off the bench- its a different story.
2. I believe certain players are bad at D simply because of their strategy (or lack thereof). Take Maggette for example (my pick btw): No help D, doesn’t move his feet and will 9 times out of 10 try to take a charge before challenging a shot. Maggette’s slow down offensive strategy also plays an adverse effect on how our defensive strategy works- ie- by slowing down the game on one end it works to our disadvantage on the other.
3. A more telling poll would be who was the Dubs’ BEST defender. As our team was last year- they were mostly bad individual defenders on a horrible defensive team (by this logic maybe Don Nelson was the team’s worst defender). Best defenders in order: Turiaf, Randolph, Azubbuike.
4. as of this post one person actually picked Buike as the teams worst defender…???!!!!?!!- Are you serious??!!? The guy often times guarded the other teams best offensive player, and has gotten better on both ends of the floor each and every year in the league. If Mullin did two good, cost effective things, while here- it was signing Buike and Turiaf to small contracts. Those are two role players who are part of the solution rather than the problem.
Man
I’m surprised Marco got 5 votes and CJ got 7. Towards the end of the season when he actually played I thought Marco was one of our best defenders, he at least made an effort. CJ is atrocious and so is magette who only got 4 votes. I think we have some Marco hating going on…
"Maybe I need somebody that can save me from the parts of myself that keep making me crazy" -Slug-
by drizztismoneybaby on May 18, 2009 7:32 AM PDT reply actions
Marco was one of our best defenders
this just goes to show how sad the Warrior’s on the defensive end.
we could really use a Battier type player – that alone might get Jack to once again give effort on defense.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions
I'll agree with that about Marco
I wouldn’t say best, but better as a defender, especially before his injury. He was a noticeable harasser.
by IQofaWarrior on May 18, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
which is y, nellie drives me crazy
MArco was the only perimeter guy aside from jack committed to playing some form of defense. Another coach would have put marco on floor 20 mins a night alone for that, to let his players know “hey guys… if u try hard on D you’ll play” He had his momments on D. He is by no means a ‘defensive specialist’ but he is becoming a legitimate nba defender.
Not nellie!! Hey guys if u jack up 5 threes a half, i’ll put u in!!
I just know marco will end up in san antonio or houston or somewhere, and ac cell when put in an actual system based on defense and an offence that isnt 1 on 5 mentality
I just know marco will end up in san antonio or houston or somewhere, and (excel) when put in an actual system based on defense and an offence that isnt 1 on 5 mentality
as one of the few W’s players that puts in effort on d (though i wouldn’t call him a good defender; i’d say above-average), i’d hate to see Marco go, but seriously – he’s a Vujacic type guy. if you were optimistic, maybe a little young Brent Barry. someone who is nice to have off your bench. though maybe you don’t mean excel, maybe you meant “he’d do better.” in that case, i might agree (though 75% of the time both the Spurs & Rockets run that “dump it into the post player and stand at the 3 pt line offense” made famous by the Hakeem Rockets). i think most of our players, save guys like monta & jack would do better in more rigid systems.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions
+1000
exactly man marco would try on defense then get on the offensive end and try to get everyone involved but never get the ball back once he passed it
by Belinelli's the savior on May 18, 2009 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Finaly
A Good post. That was good. How did Anthony Morrow only get my vote for worst? The guy couldn’t stay in front of Yao Ming if it was needed!
+1
"Maybe I need somebody that can save me from the parts of myself that keep making me crazy" -Slug-
by drizztismoneybaby on May 18, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions
I would say Monta
Normally, I would say that Monta is a worse defender than Crawford, but Monta barely played any games this year.
Ellis to the RIM!
Monta for the win?! YES!
I’m still waiting for the 5-10 random, unexplained votes for Turiaf…
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on May 18, 2009 9:21 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
There's 1 already
This might be the one time I agree with you…who in their right mind could saw Turiaf was the WORST defender on our team?
That’s just silly.
We still believe!!
Follow me on Twitter! Username - RDizzleGSoM
the one time I agree with you
Haha. Reminds me of this so-called “vegetarian” I used to go to lunch with, who would always say, chowing down on his burger, “this is the first time I’ve eaten meat in years…”
I can’t remember now, are we sworn enemies or secret lovers…? ;-)
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on May 18, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions
How easily you forget things old man…
Sworn enemies. There is no love. Kind of luck Mario and Sonic, Link and Gannondrof, or better yet, Pikachu and Pichu.
We still believe!!
Follow me on Twitter! Username - RDizzleGSoM
Monta
Was by far the worst defender. He has all that speed and agility, yet can’t stay in front of his man, how the hell is that even possible?
Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or John Wall. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Andre Smith in Silver & Black in 2009.
it’s like football, sometimes when you’re too fast, you over pursue, leaving yourself vulnerable to cut backs. he’s fine when the offensive player just goes straight to the hoop.
he’ll never be a good defender b/c he is a zero in pick & roll (which is the staple of NBA offenses). he can’t get through screens to recover and he’s at the mercy of the big man if he switches. and he’s not long enough to bother anyone over 6 ft tall on close outs.
every player has their weaknesses. just something we have to deal with.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Pick & roll defense
Exactly. Monta’s biggest problem defensively is against the pick & roll, and until he gets better at it he’s gonna continue to leave his big men out to dry. It certainly didn’t help that Crawford and Watson were equally as bad in that department. I do hope that Monta can still improve in this area; Crawford, I think, is a lost cause.
in my mind
its
crawford
cj/monta (both get deflections with quickness but both suck at locking people down)
Crawford was the worst defender, but Monta’s bad defense is obviously the most troubling going forward.
I have to say, the results of this poll are thoroughly sensible. According to GSOM, Crawford was the worst by far, followed by Monta, Maggette and CJ, in that order… the only guys who haven’t received votes are Turiaf and Randolph. All of that strikes me as exactly right. Good job, team!
Yeah
It was a tossup for me between Monta and Crawford for the worst. But at least Monta gets steals.
Steals per 48 minutes:
C.J. Watson 2.45
Monta Ellis 2.1
Jamal Crawford 1.1
I added CJ on there because that’s one part of his defense that was noticeable, but I didn’t know he was 1st on the roster. Also, CJ did make some small improvements late in the season at keeping his guy in front of him, so I didn’t consider CJ the worst.
by IQofaWarrior on May 18, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
While fouls are not a good thing, Crawford’s low foul total suggested to me that he was not trzing. A random hand check gets called now and then. It is not possible to have a foul total as low as Crawford’s unless zou if zou are even remotelz trzing to stop zour man. Crawford was too passive to make the sort of mistakes that I notice Monta making. It requires some level of effort to make a mistake.
Looking up the foul stats...
Personal fouls per 48 minutes, bottom 5 guys:
Kelenna Azubuike 3.7
Monta Ellis 3.6
C.J. Watson 3.5
Stephen Jackson 3.1
Jamal Crawford 1.8
by IQofaWarrior on May 19, 2009 1:42 AM PDT up reply actions
What I don’t understand is why Jackson gets a pass because he played better defense when he had better teammates in the We Believe days but Biedrins doesn’t.
It seems like the same situation, but for one player, it’s situational, but for the other it is a lack of skill?
You can reference Gortat this year, I can reference Garnett last year. Individual performances mean nothing. What matters is the consistency of a player during a year long season.
Besides, Gortat is pretty good from what I’ve seen.
hm.
with Jackson i’m going to say it was his effort that diminished.
with AB it was more about his skills diminishing (like his lateral quickness wasn’t there to cut off the opposing ballhandler vs. pick & roll). his effort is always there.
other arguments you could make are that Jack didn’t have a bench guy do better as AB did with Turiaf. plus AB, as the center, plays the most important position on defense, so the emphasis will always be higher.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I don’t think Turiaf has the biggest impact on Biedrins defense, the perimeter defenders do. If there is constant penetration, there will be constant fouls, there will be no defensive rhythm established, you will be less able to play aggressive on ball post defense because you have gotten too many fouls from your constant help defense. That’s what I saw this year.
But if you want to talk about his lateral quickness, I can understand your point, but would that be his skills diminishing? Or his conditioning?
And if it was his conditioning, could any of that be put on an injury? Because if you remember him doing it the past couple of seasons when he was healthy, and it’s not like he is at an age where he skills should be diminishing.
I would argue that it is just as situational for Biedrins as it is for Jackson, but, you brought up some good points, maybe you could convince me otherwise.
in regard’s to Turiaf’s impact, i’m talking about how we perceive AB. before with Foyle, Murphy, Diogu, POB, Harrington, Mbenga, Croshere, Webber, etc, AB was better than them at almost everything on the defensive end. at worst, they were only slightly better than him. in contrast, Turiaf is vastly better than AB at a lot of things on the defensive end (but AB is so much better on the glass that they are about even overall). everyone talks about how good AB was in 07 & 08, but it’s conceivable that his back ups were just that bad (which make AB look good in comparison).
of course it could be injury, other guys not following the game plan, fatigue from extra minutes or playing for the national team finally catching up to him…
it’s situational, but if we had JVG as our coach, there is no question in my mind that Jack would be just as good as he was in 07 & 08. AB would not be b/c no matter how much JVG stressed defense to the perimeter defenders, Crawford (horrendous), Maggs (bad to average), CJ (below avg), Morrow (bad) and company are (sadly) much worse defenders than Baron (bad to great), MP (good) and Barnes (avg).
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m not sure that I’d rule out that effort was an issue for Biedrins this year. I wouldn’t say that there was a lack of effort in the sense that Biedrins wasn’t playing hard, but his consistently bad spacing with the pick & roll seemed sloppy to me. It’s true that his lateral quickness took a hit, and that played a part, but Biedrins was flat-out in the wrong place at times.
Really, to me, it keeps coming back to inept defensive coaching. Jackson and Biedrins were defensive pillars of a solidly good team — not a good defensive team, but a team that stopped the defensive bleeding enough to succeed — for a season and a half. Both took defensive steps backwards last season, as did Monta, and while there were injury issues with all three, I don’t think injuries tell the whole story. It just seems like nobody was preaching defense, either in terms of strategic specifics or in terms of intensity and emphasis. I’m not suggesting that we give Biedrins or Jack or anyone else a mulligan on the year — Turiaf had a successful defensive season in this environment, and guys like Marco and Azubuike showed improvement — but the problem is the atmosphere more than the players. I think Biedrins will again be an acceptable defender when Nellie (or whoever else) again demands it.
i guess you could argue AB had mental lapses. didn’t seem like it, but it’s hard to disprove.
according to the Lepper article, it seems Nellie & Co. say it had more to do with other players (BD, MB, MP) hiding AB’s flaws. watching BD w/ the Clips, MP w/ the Magic and MB w/ the Suns, they often push the ball handlers out on pick & roll giving AB that extra split second b/c the ball handler isn’t able to take as sharp an angle off the pick or is one step out.
when he was w/ the W’s, BD was great at digging down and helping his big men out in the low post – something AB sorely missed. plus, knowing that BD is going to come down and slap at your hands probably was a deterrent as well.
i guess you could also argue that those 3 were better at (for example) if you’re going to get driven by, get driven on the left. game plan type stuff that allows AB not to have to think about where he needs to go to help, b/c he knows where he has to be. that uncertainty might have been there.
either way, AB has his strengths and weaknesses. in every defensive system i know of, the center always anchors the defense. that’s what makes guys like big ben (when he was good), dwight howard and even lesser guys like brendan haywood (see Wiz last yr vs this year) so valuable.
maybe i’m just disagreeable. i was one of his biggest supporters when everyone said he sucked. now i’m the guy going “he’s not that good” after someone says how great he is.
by the evil monkey on May 18, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I can buy that AB’s better S&R results in previous years had to do with better positioning help from teammates. Actually, it correlates with something I noticed in looking at Biedrins’s game log: that his results, especially defensively, took a dramatic turn for the worse when Crawford showed up. Biedrins looked like a genuine All-Star for the first eleven games of the season, but from game #12 on, his rebounding took a distinct turn for the worse, and opposing centers’ numbers upticked considerably. It may be that Biedrins will look better again on screen & rolls when Crawford’s not the guy he’s partnered with.
I wonder how the votes would go
If Crawford wasn’t an option.
Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or John Wall. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Andre Smith in Silver & Black in 2009.
Just guessing...
1. Monta
2. Maggs
3. CJ
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on May 18, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Theres no question
CJ Watson is the worse defender on this team, why does he play defense standing straight up? Does it hurt him to bend his knees and get into a defensive position?
no question, its obv crawford
at least ellis gets his hands all over the passing lanes…
crawford doesnt do ANYTHING except be dead weight
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
rob kurz
was the best defensive player on the team. he blocked yao!
by Rob Kurz blocks Yao Ming on May 18, 2009 12:26 PM PDT reply actions
Couple thoughts...
First off, I voted for Crawford. I think he was the worst by a significant margin which, on this team, is really saying something. He couldn’t stay in front of his man, he was never aggressive, he was constantly caught out of position. To add to that, he was so happy to stop defending and go play offense that there was more than one occasion (probably about five) where a defensive rebound would actually bounce off of him as he turned around to run up court. He would usually see it coming at the last second and try to get a hand up and the ball would deflect off of him out of bounds or to another teammate.
As for Monta, I’m willing to give him a little slack this year as he was coming off of an injury and had a lot to prove with regard to playing point guard. His defense was really, really bad, but at least he was aware enough to get twice as many steals as Crawford and put in a much better effort on the defensive boards (3.8 to 2.7 per 36min).
CJ Watson, comes in second in my book. He played about 1000 more minutes than Monta and had many more opportunities to hurt us. Could someone please tell CJ that when fighting over a screen he doesn’t have to run all the way out to half court before pursuing his man. While your at it, let him know that just because a guy comes down with the ball in his right hand you don’t have to position yourself three feet to the right. If you are going to shade a guy to his off-hand at leas be ready to stick with him when he crosses over. Instead he would actually take a step toward the spot where the player was when he made his move, once again putting himself in a position to have to chase his man all the way to the rim where he could add to the foul total of our bigs.
Speaking of the bigmen, they all had there problems defensively, but I can’t in good conscience put any of them in the running because they were constantly having to cover for the absolute worst perimeter defense in the entire league.
Ronny played very good man defense and blocked lots of shots, but rebounded poorly.
Andris rebounded incredibly, had the most steals per minute among players that played the most minutes at center for their team (at least he did 3/4 of the way through the season when I compiled the stats, he was ahead by quite a bit so I doubt it changed) blocked shots reasonably well, but played poor man defense and poor pick and roll defense.
Randolph rebounded exceptionally, blocked shots (some real highlight material blocks too), but was also overpowered in the post and lost track of his man in transition on a regular basis.
Wright may have been the worst of the bigs on defense. He actually did a pretty good job of keeping good position in the post and challenging the shot despite his thin frame, but he could not block out his man to save his life and had more than his fair share of “who am I supposed to be guarding?” moments.
I guess, since this is turning out to be more extensive than I thought, I should mention Maggette too. He was bad. I don’t think he was as bad as most people make him out to be though. His effort was definitely hit and miss, but I think he did a pretty admirable job considering he was over matched guarding PF’s for much of the season. His defense on LaMarcus Aldridge comes to mind as an example of two nights that he really got under a guys skin on defense and that’s something you can’t even say about Monta, CJ or Crawford. He also rebounded pretty well and that is a part of defense in my book, so I have to give him credit for that. So IMO he was not a good defender but not in that truly horrible category that a couple of our other guys fell into.
After ripping into so many of our guys I just want to add that the more I watch basketball the more I get the sense that defense is just as much about the culture of your team as it is about physical ability. I’m not sure how exactly you create that culture (though I’m sure it has a lot to do with coaching) but it seems like it’s necessary to get your top two or three offensive players to buy into it and the rest will fall in line. I think if you can create an atmosphere where you are expected by your teammates to give a top effort on defense that can do much more than manipulating a guys playing time, or going after him verbally on the sidelines (though these too might be important in creating that atmosphere). I doubt we’ll have that kind of culture on this team without a coaching change or a serious change in the roster, or both. Heck, I’d be happy if they just got back to being respectable and unconventional, like they were during the We Believe run, creating turnovers and running some strange gimmick defenses.
Thing 2
by olympicmike on May 18, 2009 1:17 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I think you pretty much nailed how to build a defensive team
You need a coach and a coaching staff that believes in it. You need several of your better players to play that “pit bull” aggressive defensive role (as Charles Barkley calls them) and to push others to do the same. Even the We Believe Warriors were aggressive with their fearsome swarming defense that overwhelmed the opponents into turnovers. That was some great defense considering the available players. On a side note, the 2007-08 Warriors played disruptive defense, but not aggressive physical defense.
by IQofaWarrior on May 18, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions
You need several of your better players to play that "pit bull" aggressive defensive role (as Charles Barkley calls them) and to push others to do the same.
Strange Barklez would make such a comment. His defense was never much to write home about. I guess he lacked a pitbull to provide him with such and example. The onlz thing that kept him from being a trulz terrible defender was his prodigeous rebounding.
Great post. And good on ya for defending Maggette’s, er, defending… I sorta think he gets a bad rap too but have been loath to open that can of worms.
Maggette actually strikes me as a guy who would’ve fit right in on the “We Believe” team defensively, and I don’t mean that in an entirely bad way. That team was bad defensively and often even lazy defensively, but they had some skills and they did some clever things on defense that surprised people. That pretty much sums up Maggette’s defense to me.
Risky and chaotic?
The We Believe defense involved a lot more chaos: taking risks, taking charges, getting into passing lanes. It was all about generating turnovers. You’re right on two counts: Maggs isn’t a very good defender, but he can take charges and bother big guys into making mistakes; and the team defense was downright awful when they got lazy, because the style was predicated on being incredibly active, and they weren’t good enough or motivated enough to sustain it. Perhaps the fact that most of the players on the team were fighting for contracts played into what effort they did show, as that certainly didn’t occur this season once everyone received their extensions (or signed elsewhere, i.e. Barnes and MP).
Maggete may have done descent against PF's
that were slower than him and unable to drive past him, but against someone at his position that was quicker than him he’d do that lazy poke from behind that Monta and Baron and other lazy defenders do and he’d get called for reaches. Then he’d throw his hands up and act so surprised. I saw enough of that this season. I think he gives up on d and thinks its ok cause he can score. It’s not. I was surprised this morning when I saw Marco had more votes than him, I’m glad it evened out.
"Maybe I need somebody that can save me from the parts of myself that keep making me crazy" -Slug-
by drizztismoneybaby on May 18, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I basically agree...
I’m not saying he’s good. You’re right that his perimeter D in particular was really bad. I just think he’s better than the other guys I mentioned. I think people tend to pick on Maggs weaknesses more than other players for some reason.
Marco on the other hand was (sadly) actually one of the better defenders on the team (I know it’s not saying much). Maggs definitely deserves more votes than Marco.
Thing 2
I rember an article on
Basketball Prospectus, about half way through the year in which C.J. was cited as our best defender according to their system. Even the articles author seemed baffled by the idea, I know I was.
I just voted for Maggette because it irritates me that he only gets the same number of blocks per game as Crawford. Especially considering the vertical he gets on his jams.
Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar
Stop using points per game
Points per game doesn’t tell you anything. Per possession and efficiency stats are much more meaningful. Not that the Warriors fare that much better in that regard (28th versus dead last).

by 

























