Warriors Conference Call with Season Ticket Holders: ROUGH Notes UNCUT
UPDATE (6:59 pm): A page with the audio clips of the phone conference is now up over at Warriors.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As you already know the Golden State Warriors just held a phone conference with season ticket holders and team president Robert Rowell and GM Larry Riley with play-by-play man Bob Fitzgerald moderating. There were 1,000 season ticket holders on the call and as you can imagine not all questions were answered. For instance my critical question wasn't answered even though it was an obvious softball:
I know the new OKC team is named the Thunder, but can the Warriors please bring back Thunder? It's just not the same without him, inflatable Thunder, and mini Thunder! If not, are there plans to bring in a new mascot?
As you can see Rowell really dodged the tough questions.
Just kidding. We appreciate the invitation to the call.
After the jump we've got some rough (repeat: ROUGH) notes from the call.
DISCLAIMER: I guarantee no accuracy in what follows because 1) these notes were taken while the call was going on, 2) I'm a terible typr, and 3) I'm a terrible typer. Still it's the golden web and GSoMers want and expect things fast. I'll update this post with a link to the actual audio file from Warriors.com when available. Until then enjoy these rough notes- that is if you can make any sense of my digital chicken scratch.
Jump for notes from the 1st Warriors Conference Call with Season Ticket Holders-- UNCUT!
Fitz: Warrior fans get info that is "filtered". Get the "best and most accurate information" to Warriors information.
Rowell: Suspension for 3 million dollars- actually total of 6 million to reduce season ticket prices. Reduced pricing by 4 million dollars and ammenties
Most important thing for them is to put together a good atmosphere for players.
Fitz: Youngest team in the league, lots of injuries
Rowell: Focus on product. This team needs to win basketball games. Need to hold players accountable.
Fitz: View around league on Warriors players. What do other GMs think?
Larry RIley: Great deal of interest in players. We like them too. We aren't far from being a good team. We will probably make changes in team. Doesn't see making changes and putting out an unrecognizable
Young players still have growth.
Riley: Thinks crop is weaker than last year, but you just have to get 1 player. He sees that in the #7 pick.
What can you learn in workout?
Riley: Coaches get a chance to see the players.
Can you tell us short of LeBron James you're going to hold onto Anthony Randolph?
RIley: I like him. We don't have plans other than let him grow.
Is Rowell's job in jeopardy?
Rowell: Good question and fair question. 6th season as president. Under as much pressure as anyone else. Commited to making this a winning franchise and organization. In 1998 he took over buisiness of Warriors. 30th in season ticket sales and sponsorship. His focus is to make sure product is in the top 10 in NBA as well. Has to make sure product is good for fans. All of energy and focus should be on court. Pressue- tremendous pressure. More pressure under fans.
What's the goal of the team? Trying to win now?
Riley: Feel like they can be in the playoff hunt with tweak. Winning is what they're interested in now.
Rowell: We have one of the best coaches in the NBA. We want to win and we want to win now. And we want to win to 5 years from now.
PG situation
Riley: We like MOnta as a PG. It wouldn't hurt to add a PG. We like CJ Watson as well. WIll look into improving it over the summer. Monta is one of the main focuses.
Better team defense.
Riley: Probably a better defensive team than given credit for. Better way to judge is point differential between two teams than points allowed. A great deal more emphasis on D from coaches and players.
Don Nelson retiring soon
Rowell: Focus is on this season to give Don Nelson help this season.
Fitz: Thinks rebounding and FG% defense.
Riley: FG% defense is what it's all about and rebounding quickness. Style of play is something they want to continue with. Exciting play is important, but winning is more important.
Chris Mullin situation- a lot of fans have a bad taste.
Fitz: (angrily) Do you have a question?
Rowell inserting himself in the Baron Davis situation. How much of a role has Rowell had in the basketball decisions?
Rowell: I don't think you should believe everything you read. The facts are a lot different than the misinformation out there. I actually went out on got Mullin. Worked closely with Chris on a lot of contractual decisions. 3.5-4 years been involved in negotiations with agents. Has a degree in business. Has the experience. Doesn't claim to be an expert of basketball. A big basketball fan. When you're sitting across from a lawyer-agent, you need business people.
We're a big man away from next level. Is there a possible way to get a big man via trade or draft?
Riley: Everyone in NBA is in search for a big man. We're looking to make some change. I would like some "beef" around basket. Need strength and power around basket. Our fans know the game as well.
Fitz: Got a lot of length with Biedrins, Turiaf, AR, Wright. Where do you find this guy?
RIley: Looking at guys on other squads and trades. Young guy with beef is good, but a young guy with experience is good.
Warriors BBQ was great. Nice to hear from Warriors more periodically, not just through the media.
Rowell: Beginning of new era. More outreach. This is an introductory press conference. So much speculation out there. Newspaper business in trouble. A lot of people trying to position themselves for next gigs.
Riley: We can't stop media from speculating. Robert and I are willng to have more press conferences with media and talk to fans more.
Fitz: Player agents haven't had agendas like they do now.
Riley: Bottom line. WHen you win a lot of problems aren't problems. When you lose a lot of things get magnified.
What is the future with Jamal Crawford?
Riley: Jamal has been ultimate professional. Will be evaluated like every other player. Won't be shipped off for nothing.
Customer relations- any changes to concessions, so fans can bring their own food?
Rowell: The arena subcontracts with Levvy restaurants and part of the deal. Had a 2 day meeting in Chicago about changing the menus. We've got to be able to charge for food to operate and to get players for Riley. Maybe we need to create more affordable food options.
Why the rush to sign Stephen Jackson?
Rowell: Need to get facts straight. We sat down last summer with the entire basketball staff and everyone was in agreement to extend. At the time of the extension there were 96 players in the NBA who were paid more than him. He's a player our coaches, front office, and basketball people wanted. If they want to move him later, it's a movable contract.
Riley: Stephen Jackson is worth this much. We don't talk specifically about players for them and us.
NBA is about closing games which you need an All-Star caliber guy. What's the plan in having more success in attracting free agents?
Riley: You're astute in noting we don't have a guy who can close games. We want Monta Ellis and Anthony Randolph to grow into those roles. Chris Bosh couldn't do that his rookie year, but he can do that now. If there's a free agent or trade that can do this, we'll go after him.
PG- Arenas, Parker, Brooks, vs. Monta
Riley: Not a whole lot of difference between them. Parker runs the pick and roll a lot better than Monta. Hard to find a John Stockton type guy. You don't need one to be successful.
When Mullin's contract expired, were there other GMs considered besides Riley?
Rowell: Yes.
Don Nelson's friend.
Caller said something to the effect of "Don Nelson has never won anything... He ruined team before and he's ruining it again."
-- Seems like caller got cut off --
Rowell: Nelson won a bunch of championships as a player. Don can be a pain. We need someone in this organization who can understand and manage Nellie. Riley's done it for the past 6 years. RIley is an excellent communicator. Bottom line- it's about players.
Riley: I'm being challenged and I understand. What matters is we have to go to work.
How will you guys get season ticket holders more interactive with players? Pics, autographs, hang out, etc.
Rowell: More access planned..
Been going to Warriors games since 1965 and season ticket holder for past 10 years. Last year was the most frustrating. After 45 years, really dissapointed what is our direction?
Riley: Take young players and develop them and add pieces and get into the playoffs.
Playoffs next year isn't realistic. Everyone's top 2 players are better. Hopefully Monta grows. Isn't better to angle for 2 guys?
Riley: I'll go one step further. It isn't 2. It's 3. We're in a position where we need to add a guy and grow. We need to have a go to guy at the end of the game. Very difficult to go from 29 to playoffs, but he's about setting high goals. Next year you'll see more balance in West. If we can get into the range of 40-42, that might do it. With a healthy roster, we're better than the 29 win total. It isn't fool's gold to say let's be one of those teams that gets into the playoffs.
Financial problems for NBA teams. How are the Warriors here?
Rowell: Fiscal health in leu of economy is pretty good. A lot of it is being in the 5th largest market in the country. Closing in on 70% renewal of season tickets. This will rank in the top 12 in league. Our players feed off energy from crowd. Other cities have no one watching. You guys are the best. We need you back. One of things you're going to see is that the salary cap and luxury tax actually go down. Have to be creative through free agency, sign and trades, etc.
Riley: Not automatic to lose close games. It's on us to make changes. We need to play a better brand of basketball on the road- be close to .500.
Trade front. Would you say Warriors are more likely to package youth or more likely to take experience and go young, like OKC did?
Riley: What I'd like to see is be like Boston- get KG and Ray Allen. We have enough young players, getting another young player doesn't get much. Getting as establish veteran and leader is better. No question that economy has gotten ahold of all but 4 or 5 teams in the NBA. A lot of teams will be looking to cut costs.
PG is important. Monta has a 2-guard mentality, not a point guard mentality.
Riley: He does not have a 1-guard mentality. Doesn't run a team. He's going to have to do it a different way. He can't run a pick and roll. Will he there at that Chauncy Billups level? Probably not year. Our passing skills need to improve. We use a lot of people at the point guard, they just aren't called point guards. Better to have a true point guard. We've got to find a different way to do it. We are looking for an established player, but he needs to be a passer. It is likely Don Nelson finishes a game in a smaller lineup. You put the other teams in a bind, also yourselves with rebounding. You have a PF who has to guard a guard. You usually have better free throw shooters, etc.
So m any players with amazing potential, but we have to rebuild year after year and because we don't keep them.
Riley: Morrow and Randolph played big minutes. We want to keep players 2-5 years and build off of them. I fully believe in college seniors of today. Josh Howard taught me that. I have nothing wrong with drafting a senior player. We have had discussions with Monta. Spoke with Monta two days ago to see how Monta feels mentally. He's a guy they want to see develop. If you put Anthony Randolph in this year's draft, he might go #1. He'd be 1 or 2.
Rowell: Randolph averaged 17.9 minutes. More than TMac, Kobe, and Jermaine O'Neal as rookies. Agrees we do need to build on young guys and keep them together.
Accountability. Organization has made playoffs 1 in 15 years. Where is your acountability? Why should fans believe organization will be different? How serious is this organization in going farther than just 1st round?
Rowell: 100% there. We are accountable. Our focus is to create an exciting environment. Over the course of the last decade, I'll put our building against any in the league. Hope you were exciting this past season and saw promise. I'm not happy with 1 in 15 playoff appearances. We barely made it 3 years back. Next year we finished with 9th record- went 10-12 at the end of the season. Part of accountability and management. We have to do a job and win basketball games.
Call finished off with this Fan Poll: This fan poll has been helpful in my decision to renew season tickets.
For some proof that we actually value grammar and complete sentences around these parts see: Warriors Conference Call with Season Ticket Holders: What would you ask Robert Rowell and Larry Riley?
-----------------
UPDATE (3:04 pm): Loyal GSoMer RayAlmeda also has some notes- far superior to my digital chicken scratch- in the FanPost: Recap of the 2009 Warriors Fan Forum. phiLthyphiL also has a nice transcription in the comments of the announcement piece.
Seriously are we not the biggest bunch of losers for: 1) caring about the Warriors, 2) actually being a season ticket holders of this sorry organization, 3) participating in this call, and 4) actually risking serious carpal tunnel to type out what basically amounted to the status quo company line?
I must say the passion around these parts is quite Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
36 comments
|
Comments
Beat my recap
By two minutes. nice recap ABO!
Golden State Warriors fan since 1984. The Filipino sensation!
The loudest Warrior fan in Section 208, Row DS, Seats 15-16.
by RayAlmeda on May 21, 2009 3:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No way- You da man. Your notes are better. Let me give them some link love.
by Atma Brother ONE on May 21, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, AB1.
Pretty standard boilerplate stuff. I found this to be the most troubling answer…
Riley: Probably a better defensive team than given credit for.
Um…?
Better way to judge is point differential between two teams than points allowed.
This statement is not untrue, but by point differential, we were the seventh-worst team in basketball, just as we were by record. This was not a misleading 29-53… we were a very bad team, and the overwhelming reason why was our defense. By any pace-adjusted metric you can find, we were one of the three worst defensive teams in basketball. We were not better than we were given credit for… our defense, from coaching to execution to roster construction, was unacceptable, and it’s troubling to hear the new GM play it down.
by onlxn on May 21, 2009 3:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Probably a better defensive team than given credit for.
This is a true statement because people like to say the following things:
1. The Warriors don’t play defense
2. The Warriors are the worst defensive team in the NBA
So being, by your estimation, somewhere between the 3rd and 7th worst defensive team in the league is still better than they get credit for.
Let’s turn that frown up-side-down!
Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.
by bloodsweatndonuts on May 22, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Riley: Everyone in NBA is in search for a big man. We’re looking to make some change. I would like some “beef” around basket. Need strength and power around basket. Our fans know the game as well.
Fitz: Got a lot of length with Biedrins, Turiaf, AR, Wright. Where do you find this guy?
RIley: Looking at guys on other squads and trades. Young guy with beef is good, but a young guy with experience is good.
SOUNDS LIKE WE’RE GETTING BIG BABY!!!!
by tafkasam on May 21, 2009 3:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like a bunch of stock BS to me.
Man, I dislike Fitz.
by AndOnTheDrums... on May 21, 2009 3:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
Fitz’ homerism is unparalleled.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
by kenntoe on May 21, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like him on KNBR, just not his biased commenting in games
Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or John Wall. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Andre Smith in Silver & Black in 2009.
by ejdacanay on May 21, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i used to like him on KNBR, but his lack of objectivity is getting annoying.
by tafkasam on May 21, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
how does the kool aid taste buddy?
my code name is "kelenna bahongpuki"
by VonteegoCummings on May 22, 2009 2:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still unsure about the direction we're heading in...
I think Rowell and Riley are lining up for runs as politicians w/ all the red herring mumbo-jumbo. A few solid answer in believe Monta is the point, and that they like what they see from AR, but I’ll be skeptical of everything until the starting lineup goes in before game 1 next year.
by esco41510 on May 21, 2009 4:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
its nice to know they atleast realize the talent of AR, and aren’t willing to dump him yet
by tafkasam on May 21, 2009 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s like saying “Phew! Good thing they’re only dumb, cuz I was getting worried that they were retarded”!
Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.
by bloodsweatndonuts on May 22, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oh...
and much love for the recap, Atma n Ray, you both did a good job. Much appreciated.
by esco41510 on May 21, 2009 4:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I did like the fact that they were high on the Anthony brothers
But boy what the hell were they talking about Monta? He’s our point guard, but he doesn’t think like a point guard and we should get a point guard???
There's a party in my mind.
And I wish that I was there.
by qin on May 21, 2009 5:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Towards the end of the season
Monta told the team he didn’t want to be the PG. Nellie said this in his last interview of the season. So the warriors are going to try and get a new pg. That’s why they are mentioning now he is not a pg.
by The Golden One on May 22, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
are you sure?
dont recall it being publicized at all… and it would have been
by tafkasam on May 25, 2009 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And thanks for the quick recap, its about time the FO wants to keep in touch wit there fan base.
To bad it took a low renewal rate to get them there.
And whats up with not being able to ask what the deal with Mullin was? It did leave leave a bad taste in a lot of our mouths regardless on if it was the right move or not.
There's a party in my mind.
And I wish that I was there.
by qin on May 21, 2009 5:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice work on the recap
This took me back. like, wtf?
Q- “PG- Arenas, Parker, Brooks, vs. Monta”
“Riley: Not a whole lot of difference between them” = Epic Fail
wow, this guy doesnt know basketball.
by meximocha on May 21, 2009 5:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
cmon aaron brooks is not better than monta. He had a good series against the slowest pg in the nba, derek fisher. Arenas at 22 looked similar to monta. Parker is much better
by tafkasam on May 21, 2009 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
riley's ambivalence for ellis coming out
in one response, he considers ellis not too different than arenas, parker, brooks, with the little comment that parker runs the pick and roll better….then a little further he’s a little more forthcoming: ‘(ellis) doesn’t have a 1-guard mentality, can’t run a team, can’t run the pick and roll’—yet riley also states ‘we like monta as a point guard…Monta is one of the main focuses’(of the summer)
a reasonable supposition to make after this equivocating would be that ellis is a main focus for trade consideration. at least Riley came right out and gave a specific expectation of 40-42 wins, which is upper tier mediocre and realistic. they’re not getting there simply by having their present team healthy, though, a minimum of two strong additions (don’t have to be stars) are required just to get to .500.
by the.monk on May 21, 2009 6:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i think they dont have a choice. Monta is untradeable. They r hoping he has a good summer and comes back strong. I still dont rule out trading him… though i wouldnt unless we had a pg in waiting (a la sessions and mo williams in milwaukee)
by tafkasam on May 21, 2009 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm curious
about what it says on the teleconference page about the exclusive videos and answers that weren’t answered on the phone calls
by thecity23 on May 21, 2009 6:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I just hate Rowell..
I can never hear or read about an interview with that guy without seeing the words, “season-tickets, renewals, entertainment value.”
*#&$@
by phiLthyphiL on May 21, 2009 8:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
when he was asked about rebuilding he sai 2-5 guys
when you look at the great teams they keep more than that. he is just a bad owner in general. but i have some hope for riley
by gsw.raiders on May 21, 2009 9:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
anyone else thing its suspicious
when asked about not having a closer he brings up chris bosh? Granted bosh is an all star but when i think of ‘closers’ cant say hes anywhere in my frame of thought. It ussually goes Kobe, DWade, Lebron, cp3 and so on
by tafkasam on May 22, 2009 8:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm really surprised the Thunder question wasn't asked
Atma, woulda been a good one to ask that (it was my backup in case they didn’t answer my “validity on Baron/Marcus Williams and Maggette/Amare Stoudemire/Chris Both trade reports” question).
It’s too bad nobody remembered about it. It really gave our team a lot… now it’s the same ol’ Pizza (can can can!) song all the time during breaks.
Golden State Warriors fan since 1984. The Filipino sensation!
The loudest Warrior fan in Section 208, Row DS, Seats 15-16.
by RayAlmeda on May 22, 2009 9:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually it was asked.
But the warriors chose not to answer that question.
by The Golden One on May 22, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way Riley and especially Rowell speak of Don Nelson is disrespectful and pathetic
That’s like Rob Kurz and Jamario Davidson criticizing the way Karl Malone goes about his business. Riley and Rowell are not qualified to wash Nelson’s balls (basketballs naturally) much less speak of him in even remotely condescending terms.
They’re over-compensating for the public perception that Don Nelson is going to dictate all of the Warriors player-personnel decisions and it makes them sound even lamer. They signed up for the Don Nelson experience, the good the bad and the fugly. Man-up, deal with it. They are at his mercy but they know that is, by far, the best hope this franchise has at winning games and filling the Oracle every night. Best not to risk pissing him off by disrespecting him publicly.
Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.
by bloodsweatndonuts on May 22, 2009 5:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That photo advertising the conference call is pretty funny
What person looks at that and thinks “that ‘you’ really could be ‘me’ and that sounds great!”?
Who the hell want’s to be in Larry Riley/Robert Rowell manwich?
Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.
by bloodsweatndonuts on May 22, 2009 5:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















