How bout Bosh Now?
by VD cant be Contained on Jun 26, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
Email
Print
In all the rumors surrounding this Amare deal, it looks like we'll have to give up 3-4 pieces amongst the Beans/Wright/Bellinelli/Buke/Curry fivesome. Personally, I think 3 is doable, especially if its Beans/Wright/Bellinelli, but 4 is just way too much. But given what's been floating around to PHX, couldnt a comprable package land us Bosh instead? I'd have to think that Beans/Wright/Bellinelli would do it, maybe a lotto-protected or at most a top-5 protected future #1 as icing on the cake. Granted, it would be a lot more difficult to lock him in to an extension before the deal is completed, but Toronto knows hes a flight risk...check that, a flight guarantee, so getting 90 cents on the dollar for him now and young relatively cheap pieces would be ideal for them.
Also, I'm guessing Maggette's name isnt getting any love in any of these deals bc of his contract...a Beans/Maggs for Amare wouldve been nice. Toronto may have an interest in a scorer like him as well...
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If we could do
maggs + andris for anyone i’d pull the trigger just to get rid of maggs contract. but if we can do it to get an all star caliber player…wow wow we wow. not going to happen.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
How about Maggs for Camby
May have to throw in a pick or player but Camby could help rebounding and defense plus there would lots of money in 2010 for free agents
by T-Money on Jun 26, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
i like that deal
be the change you wish to see in the world.
Or how about Maggette for Tyson Chandler
hear me out before you flame -
if we trade Wright but keep Curry in the Amare deal, we need another big and Chandler’s contract is much shorter than Maggette’s, plus with Curry we have firepower coming off the bench
ok, target lit …
Id rather trade for Amare
Amare seems like a perfect fit in our style of offense and I think there is a better chance Stoudemire stays than Bosh
Oakland Raiders Fan
Golden State Warriors Fan
San Francisco Giants Fan
San Jose Sharks Fan
MMA Fan
USC Trojan Fan
by i love sports101 on Jun 26, 2009 10:23 AM PDT reply actions
he commits to defense
amare is all offense,and I believe Bosh is on the same level as Amare on the offensive end too.
Its time for a change...
by RunNdGun on Jun 26, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions
It doesn't matter
I think Bosh will leave us anyway. Stoudemire seems like a match made in heaven with the us.
Oakland Raiders Fan
Golden State Warriors Fan
San Francisco Giants Fan
San Jose Sharks Fan
MMA Fan
USC Trojan Fan
by i love sports101 on Jun 26, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Bosh is younger. Bosh has yet to have a down year where he took a big step backwards. Stoudemire has. I don’t know if it’s decline or attitude or what, but Stoudemire 08-09 is not a player worth max money. Which Stoudemire would show up? (and who plays the part of Nash to get him the ball, something that made a big difference in his his numbers?)
They will both leave us
the problem is if we can get them to sign an extension
Its time for a change...
by RunNdGun on Jun 27, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions
i think that bosh is more of a nellie guy because he has more range on his jumper than amare does and he rebounds better
be the change you wish to see in the world.
Bosh can't play center
that’s why we need Amare, he did it for 2 years with the Suns.
by duballers23 on Jun 26, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Amare can't play center either
In those 2 years, he was getting bulldozed by real centers – hence the Shaq trade.
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
Huh?
I can’t imagine why you’d rather have Amare. Bosh is younger, has a better attitude and is a better defender. The only way the deal gets done w/ either guy is if they sign an extension so if we get Bosh we get him for 5 seasons.
true
bosh is hands down better than amare. amare’s defense is poor (especially exposed when he couldnt do a thing to help on d in that spurs series) also bosh seems to be a much harder worker and has more tenacity.
bosh should be first option
then amare
Bosh has come out and said he wont sign an extension
he’s opting out whatever team hes on and will sign a max deal of his choosing
To say 3 is doable...but 4 is not
for a perennial all-star and arguable the most skilled bigman we’ve had since C-Webb is laughable.
Wright. Belinelli. Curry. They can all be replaced.
I don’t want to part with Bookie, but if it’s necessary, then so be it.
i wouldnt give up bookie
but i think your completely right, between wright marco and curry, thats a reasonable 15-20 minutes per game between the 3 of them unless nelly desides to play a rookie. and for an all-star in the paint who can run the floor, i don’t think you can give up too much, we could even throw in Kurz (our teams future) and i’d be cool with that
buki isnt in the trade talks anymore, supposedly (espn)
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkSJSU on Jun 26, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
SERIOUSLY? YAYAYAYAY
Azubuike? More like Azucutie!
by goldenstatelove on Jun 26, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions
i don't want 1 year of anybody
that’s too much team to give up for a single year of someone. we aren’t winning the championship next year if we give up 3-4 quality players, i don’t care who we get. we’d win down the road when we got our depth back.
Dude
They aren’t going to make the trade if it’s not long term. They are going to try and construct a contract before he is traded if the trade happens.
by duballers23 on Jun 26, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions
part of the agreement
is that he sign an extension, and we are in the process of negotiating the extension
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkSJSU on Jun 26, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
can you negotiate with a player during trade talks? that sounds like tampering.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
if it was tampering
KG wouldn’t be a Celtic right now
did he have an extension lined up before-hand? i honestly don’t recall.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
It was pretty much the same situation
KG had one more year left on his deal and would only sign an extension if he was traded to the team of his choice. Once Minny had a deal they liked w/ Boston, Boston negotiated the contract w/ KG, although the contract was technically signed by Minny and then KG was traded to Boston.
It would be tampering if, let’s say, Amare didn’t get traded to the W’s and the W’s started negotiating a contract w/ him in the Spring for after his current deal expired
can you negotiate with a player during trade talks? that sounds like tampering
It isn’t if you get permission from the other team which is commonplace for something like this.When you’re talking about getting a guy to sign an extension along with a trade, it’s absolutely necessary. Interviewing someone prior to a trade in this context isn’t tampering. It’s significantly different than lobbying for a player under contract to opt out.
hmmm
As much of an offensive monster that is Amare, i’m not a big fan of his because of his defensive ineptness and his underachieving ability to rebound. Plus he’s displayed some attitude last year which makes me wonder if he may display the same type of attitude for us if say… he doesn’t get enough touches, or maybe get’s in Nellie’s doghouse.
I much prefer Bosh for reasons opposite of Amare’s negatives. While neither is really a true center, oh well… we can always make due with what we got.
Finally...someone who knows what they are talking about.
PLEASE DONT DO IT WARRIORS! The buzz here in Az is my thinking EXACTLY… we are getting fleeced on this deal if we give them Curry! Does anyone in the Bay Area understand THIS WILL BE WORSE THAN WHAT THE LAKERS DID TO GRIZZLIES LAST YEAR!!!
Read this from the AZ papers this morning… they are already counting on a 4 for 1 trade with Curry included… and if they try to throw in Barbosa…we are screwed EVEN MORE!
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2009/06/26/20090626sunscurry.html
They should be more than happy to get Beans/Wright and Belinilli.
I cant believe we are even considering this trade. Everyone down here in the desert is pumped about this trade and KNOW Stoudamire is past his prime. Has anyone in SF looked at a medical file on this has been?
BUt a bigger question is : why are’nt we looking at BOSH instead?
by WarriorFanHatesTheSunsInAZ on Jun 26, 2009 2:07 PM PDT reply actions
because we're stupid.
Its time for a change...
by RunNdGun on Jun 26, 2009 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Would you rather have Curry or Bukie?
by High Street Native on Jun 26, 2009 3:19 PM PDT reply actions
Curry is being mentioned as an untouchable in this trade proposal
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
well not really.
Curry is nice, but he isn’t Amare nice. And Kaz is a good role player that it. I would trade him for Amare. And we are getting a extention to Amare. He is not going to leave if that happen. Bosh is going to NY. Just face it, he want to trade The Craptors. But, he isn’t going to come here since it’s a small market. And the dood can’t plays center at all.
by warriorfan4life on Jun 27, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Go after BOTH! Bosh & Amare are both holding their franchises by the scroat
Chicago is in the Bosh hunt too, but let’s figure out how to recapture some leverage.
Hmm, what if we turned to Toronto and offered the same package as for Amare (ignore for a second one is more ideal for GSW than the other – either is an upgrade over Andris and both can make us a contender for WCF).
Andris, Marco, Wright.
No Curry, and we’ll add what we need to if they’re throwing in a player or a pick.
Both GMs know that the other franchise is on the other phone, and both realize the fact that their own PF has leverage because they’re looking at ending up with nothing to show for their stud. Plus, there haven’t been better offers forthcoming since the Amare rumors came to light.
Playing them off each other could move one or the other to make a deal without Curry. Either way, obviously we need an extension if we’re letting Andris go.
Ballsy, I like it. Toronto won’t go for the same package as the one Phoenix wants. Phoenix is over Amar’e. They don’t like his ego, plus the injury is uncertain. Toronto isn’t desperate to unload Bosh. We’d have to give them AB/BW/Marco/Buike or Curry. I’m not down. I’d rather wait and see what the team looks like this year.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"
Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
