What should the Warriors do about the Stoudemire Situation?
by warriors8ymail on Jun 26, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
Email
Print
via/ Charlotteobserver.com
I think that the Golden State Warriors Should keep Stephen Curry in the Bay Area becuase his style of play fits the Warriors so well. If he stays in the Bay Area he has a big chance of being named Rookie of the Year. They are saying he cant play defense but at Golden state he wouldn't need to. He is one of the best shooters in the draft and he will be a big scorer for the warriors. He can also pass well and move the offense. Even if he dosent start if he plays 15 min a game he can score a lot of points. So i say Keep him, C'mon Golden State.
Now if we decide to make the trade for Amare Stoudemire i say this is all we should offer the Phx Suns.
Phx Suns Recieve:
- Biendrins C
- Marco SG
- Wright PF
Golden State Warriors Recieve:
- Stoudemire PF/C
That should be the offer we should make to PHX, if they say no then its done. No Amare then.
- I say we should say no to PHX if they ask for Azubukie, becuz if we loose him our defense drops a lot. He's a great defender.
- Also if PHX says no to that offer we will still be a great team i think.
- Biendrins is a very young talented player and he's one of the best Centers in the game. Could be one of the best in future. He gets Double doubles, rebounds, points, and he can block.
- Wright still needs to develop and needs to get stronger, and put on weight. but he will be solid in the future. But I think Randolph is ahead of him rite now.
- Marco is a great shooter and he showed his PG skills last year, but our roster is so crowded with guards its going to be hard for him to get playing time. but good for when we are in need for 3's.
Warriors Projected Line up with Amare and the Deal Above:
- PG: Ellis/ Curry/ Law Maybe Warriors resign Watson???
- SG: Jackson//Morrow
- SF: Azubukie/ Maggette
- PF: Randolph/ Turiaf/ Kurz/ Davidson
- C: Stoudemire
- SUBS:
- PG Claxton
- PG Demarcus Nelson- can someone tell me if the warriors might use him next year???
Warriors Projected Line Up without the Stoudemire Trade:
- PG: Ellis/ Curry/ Law
- SG: Jackson/ Marco/ Morrow
- SF: Azubukie/ Maggette
- PF: Randolph/ Wright/ Turiaf
- C: Biendrins
- SUBS:
- PF Kurz
- PF Davidson
- PG Claxton
Trades the Warriors Should Make:
- I say the warriors should try to trade Maggette because he's costing us soo much money.
- IDK if we should resign Watson but he's really good with the Warriors.
- I think we should trade or cut Claxton.
- We should see if we could trade Wright or Marco becuz they wont get enough playing time.
- What's gonna happen with Demarcus Nelson? he was really good.
Rumors:
- Maggette for AK47 Andrei Kerilenko??? IT would be cool to have next to biendrins wouldn't it???
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
107 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Don't trade Curry
Biedrins, B Wright and Marco is already a lot…….
azubukie is not a good defnder..
hes average
mp is a good defender, jack is a solid defender
bukie is not a good defender..
plus we need to lose him or maggette to help with the log jam
I think I threw up in my mouth.
I say we should say no to PHX if they ask for Azubukie, becuz if we loose him our defense drops a lot. He’s a great defender.
Two things definitely wrong with this sentence:
1. Azubukie is a role player. He’ll be no better than he was last year imo. Holding up an Amare Stoudamire trade for freakin’ Azubuike?! I say this with as much respect as possible, GTFO.
2. Azubukie was, at best a mediocre defender as a Warrior. Translation: On a non-Warrior team, he’s a crappy defender. He fails to exert any effort at defending the pick-n-roll. How’s his close-outs? I’d say infrequent at-best.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
by kenntoe on Jun 26, 2009 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Bukie can do it all
he can defend, dunk over kobe, and shoot. He is a key to the warriors lineup.
GSW, SFG, SF49ers #1
I'll pass on Amare
I like our squad as it is, get em healthy and get em on the court. We should chase down somebody else for our roster. I like our bigs and feel they can do just fine. Biedrins is a solid reliable ballplayer who keeps his mouth shut, knows his role and plays. He is still young and can get better. BWright is a good ball player when healthy. He’s gotta be on the mend and ready soon enough. Don’t forget, Yao is out, Oden sucks and Shaq is back in the East. Our bigs will do just fine.
Let them play together, let them gel and develop a chemistry. We’ve got the talent and did last year as well we just need them to start clicking.
Claxton as a sub? He wont make this roster.
Now you're just pulling my chain.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
I know claxton wont be on the roster
if you would have read i said most likely he would be traded or cut.
GSW, SFG, SF49ers #1
Please, please, Warriors, do NOT cut Claxton. He will be useful at the deadline.
Maybe in a revised Amare deal? I don’t know…maybe.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
you make it sound like trading Maggette is easy...
Its time for a change...
by RunNdGun on Jun 26, 2009 4:46 PM PDT reply actions
no i dont
i didn’t say that it was official it’s called a rumor.
Plus nobody wants Maggette becuz of his big contract $50 mil.
GSW, SFG, SF49ers #1
where is this rumor?
link?
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkSJSU on Jun 26, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm President of the Maggette
Hater Club, and even still it’s a horrible idea for us. Kirelinko has an even worse contract than Maggette and he’s not nearly the offensive threat that Maggz is. Also, Nellie doesn’t play guys that can’t put the ball in the basket, and AK47 is an atrocious offensive player.
We’d be lucky to move Maggz with the contract he has, having said that, let’s start our own rumor.
-Corey Maggette for a Shawn Marion Sign & Trade. SPREAD THE WORD!
Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!
Attrocious? Me thinks you’re using that word a bit freely. Kirilenko isn’t attrocious on offense. He’s not a star, but he’s been above average efficiency (sometimes far above average) for all of his career. He isn’t a high volume scorer. Don’t confuse that with “attrocious”. They don’t mean the same thing. Kirilenko can, and does put the ball in the basket. His TS% has been very good for his entire career.
Maggette is not nearly the defensive player that Kirilenko is. Defense is half the game, even if it’s a half that gets ignored by those do believe the hype.
He is with the Bulls for now. They'll try him out.
Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell? Oh no hide the children!
by Nuck Chorris on Jun 26, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Easily Tradeables- in no particular order
Claxton contract (on its own or after 60 days it can be combined).
Acie Law (same as above)
Azubuike
Wright
Maggette
Belinelli
Davidson
Kurz
I would consider trading Curry or Jackson depending on what was coming back, but Biedrins deserves one more year here. Garbage stats are underrated and not only are Biedrins’ impressive, but he gets them in limited minutes. There aren’t very many good centers available in the 2010 FA.
Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell? Oh no hide the children!
Garbage stats are underrated and not only are Biedrins’ impressive, but he gets them in limited minutes.
He limits his own minutes by sucking on “D” and fouling too much, not to mention giving up a ton of 3-pt. plays!!! He’s pretty much as good as he’s going to be, and if that’s all, I’m ready to move him for someone better…Amare!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jun 26, 2009 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions
We've seen what happens...
…When Amare is asked to play the 5 on a regular basis. This deal is way sketch, why give up on Wright/Belli so fast. And Beans is a great center for the game we run.
Bad Idea.
That's pretty much why the suns got Shaq. Neither worked out for them.
Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell? Oh no hide the children!
by Nuck Chorris on Jun 26, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Before Shaq
The Suns had the best record in the West with Amare at center, then when they got Shaq they got worse.
They have to SIGN CURRY right away.
That way they won’t be able to trade him for a while.
That’s what happened when we got Brandan Wright, Mullin stupidly signed him right away and couldn’t trade him for KG until August 26, 2007. While we were waiting for that date, the Celtics finally gave in and decided to offer Al Jefferson to KG (an offer we couldn’t beat).
Had Mullin not signed Wright, the Warriors could have packaged him for KG before the Celtics could consider giving up Al Jefferson.
by Precise Films Productions on Jun 26, 2009 4:57 PM PDT reply actions
We don't make the trade
we’re a 34 win team (HEALTHY).
We do make the trade (Biedrins, Belinelli, Wright AND even Curry
We’re a 48-50 win team (HEALTHY).
PG: Monta, CJ
SG: Jack, Morrow
SF: Azubuike, Maggette
PF: Randolph, Turiaf
C: Amare, _______
I’d like our chances next year being able to lure some decent FA’s with a Monta + Randolph and Amare core.
34 wins, damn that's low.
I actually like this team a lot. I don’t think 40-45 wins are out of our range at all. Add in growth, Monta, Curry, the fact that Nellie didn’t figure out are best lineup with these players until the offseason, I say 40-45 are possible
No no its Amar'e
minus Wright Bellineli and possibly Curry or Azubuike that win us those other 14 games
haha
all that added offense and lack of defense is the recipe for more win’s huh?
retarded
this trade is stupid, amare isn’t taking any team anywhere.
it's just a game.
www.bayareascores.com
all that added offense and lack of defense is the recipe for more win’s huh?
Where’s the Defense?
Biedrins = Rebounds, maybe a few blocks, but a ton of “and 1’s”!
Wright = Changes shots, but he’s not going to get any playing time anyway!
Belinelli = Improved defense and hustles, but once again, he won’t get any playing time!
Curry = Reports have been that he’s not a defender so nuff said!
So what makes getting Amare stupid in terms of gaining more offense for ummm the lack of defense already exhibited by the ones we’re trying to trade? We’d still have Turiaf to man the middle, and Randolph alone blocks a couple of shots per game.
There’s a lot of “if’s” both ways, but IF Amare can be as good as he was when he’s 100% healthy, and IF he can stay healthy, he’s easily capable of 20+ pts and 9+ rebounds per game!
We’ve seen the Warriors make some questionable moves or moves that never panned out (Marcus Williams), so we should be used to all of it now. At least we’d be getting an All-Star player in return this time!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jun 26, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions
i must agree
i like how biengrins plays in the warriors lineup.
He is arguabily one of the best centers in the NBA.
He can put stats on the board.
I remember when he had like 18 straight double doubles or something.
GSW, SFG, SF49ers #1
If an Amare trade included an extension clause...
Which is pretty doubtful, I would probably do it. But it doesn’t seem sustainable in the least bit.
I say we don't rush this trade
We’re offering the best deal out of any team. Let’s see how summer league, training camp, and the first month or 2 of the season go. If it is obvious that this team actually blows (they don’t) then we trade for Amar’e we still have the best offer for Phoenix.
No need to rush, wait it out, see what’s up.
+1
I don’t think there is a rush, but I do think they’re just waiting to see if Amare would sign an extension, then they’d pull the trigger assuming the Warriors are actually open to trading Curry too.
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jun 26, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
But then we only get half a season of Amare.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
For Amare
I want Amare, but not for Curry, that’s too much.
Just replace Morrow with Curry (another pure shooter, slower than curry, can score lots of points, not the playmaker curry is)
biedrins
Wright
marco
Morrow
done deal
We still look like this
Curry/Watson/Law/Monta
Monta/Buike/Curry
Jax/Buike
Randolph/Ronny
Amare/Ronny
I was just over on the suns SB site
They would be pissed if the deal didn’t include Curry, unless it includes AR. So we’re banking on Steve Kerr being an big idiont, which seems possible
That's just plain greedy =)
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
Amare or Nash?
I been reading the buzz in AZ, it’s split: the naysayers don’t understand what they getting or why:
Let me spell it out: the only reason we make this trade is because were hungry for a Star to many years of being starless in Oaktown:
The Suns need to realize a few things:
Beans game will explode in AZ, he will work so well with Nash on the pick and roll it’ll will be scary to watch, AB has good hands and great footwork, he will dominate the boards for them this year:
He’s only 22 and will only get better, because he has a great attitude and wants to be a winner: very talented for a big man: he will fill the void that Amare leaves almost by himself with the help of Nash: management knows this already: If we trade for Nash I would keep the team we have: let Nash make everyone better especially AB.
Secondly, BW will mature this year as a low post scorer, his biggest drawback is he’s too weak still, he needs to get in the weight room and put on 20 lbs like AR did: this could happen over the summer, and then they have a PF that was the 8th pick 2 years ago that’s coming into his prime, great attitude, tones of talent, and will only get better and better: I honestly don’t know what his ceiling is, because in order for him to reach full potential he needs to put on 20 to 30 pounds and then he may be something special;
Marco’s potential has not even begun to be taped into yet, I don’t know what Rod’s talking about on KMBR? This kid has massive potential, the problem with him is he can’t flourish under Nelson, he need’s that prototypical point guard to steady his game and show him his place on the count: Nash is the key to this trade for the Suns:
He will bring the best out of these guys, they will be transformed under his leadership:
What I would be willing to do is trade Monta straight up for Nash hands down right now at 35, we need him for 2 or 3 years to form this team, let Stephen learn the point under the master: Beams will turn into a different player, everyone will find their place on the court, Don knows Nash like the back of his hand:
I could say a lot more but this is enough to get the point across:
Bottom line is, Rather than give up AB,BW,MB, and SC, for Amare, I would rather get Nash for the next few years and build up the team we have now:
by ForestGrump on Jun 26, 2009 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Saying BW only needs to put on 20 to 30 pounds
and then he may be something special is equal to saying Monta will grow 2-3 inches this summer and be a taller and dominant SG.
Everyone’s anointing Curry as the next Jesus Shuttlesworth…I just don’t see it happening..
No to trading Monta for Nash….
+1
So Curry can shoot in college…we’ve seen Morrow not only shoot in the NBA, but be the most accurate long range shooter in the NBA! Curry’s still a small PG or SG, if Monta played the point, so where does that leave us in terms of defense? Can they really coexist? What good would a trade for Nash do w/ Curry in the lineup too?
I think I’d rather have a Monta + Amare combo than Nash + Biedrins!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jun 26, 2009 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Can they really coexist?
initially vehemently against pairing Monta & Curry on the roster as redundant talents, but am now warming to Monta-Jax-Curry rotation at the 1-2: Monta and Curry wouldn’t be on the floor together all that much, and when they are we’re pretty hard to guard – Monta drive & kick out to Curry, or Curry off the Pick&Roll, etc.
of course we wouldn’t be a good defensive backcourt there, but w/ Jax rotating in at the SG & SF to match up as necessary we’d be one less step from atrocious, and if we started Monta-Jax-Kaz we’re two steps away from atrocious at least to start games.
MAYBE
But to be honest…I don’t think the addition of Curry makes us thaaaat much better than last year! We basically have the same team, minus Crawford, who actually single-handedly won us a couple of games.
My concern is not only the defensive aspect of having both Monta and Curry out on the floor at the same time, but still the lack of a dominant PF! I’m high on Randolph, but I don’t think he can still be a true PF. He’s better off the dribble or slashing or coming in for tip-ins, not playing w/ his back to the hoop or playing pick and rolls like an Amare would.
Obtaining a player like Amare, almost automatically lifts the team w/ just his presence! I don’t think Biedrins or Wright in the lineup actually scared any teams, if you know what I mean!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jun 26, 2009 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions
By having everyone play 70 games we are easily 10 wins better than last year
thats a conservative estimate in all honesty
the addition of Curry (by himself) doesn't make us thaaaat much better than last year
agreed, not on his own maybe
but let’s also subtract Crawford & add Amare for the pkg we’ve been hearing -
Guards in Rotation:
Monta, Curry, Jax, Maggette, Morrow (- and maybe KAz, maybe not)
Bigs in Rotation:
Amare, Randolph, Turiaf
I’d really like to get Clark back in the Amare deal, particularly if we send 4: Andris, BWright, Marco, AND KAz
But with or without Clark, that club is a playoff club, and a potential WCF club.
minus Crawford, who actually single-handedly won us a couple of games.
The games he singlehandedly won were dwarfed by the ones where he contributed heavily to losses by shooting poorly and playing no defense at all. That’s not as conspicuous as lighting up the scoreboard. That doesn’t make it less of an impact just because it doesn’t make the highlight reel. Losing Crawford is not a detriment.
by jae on Jun 27, 2009 6:17 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's not just Curry's scoring -
Being the only option for his team, he was always bring the ball up the court against all kinds of traps and double teams, and breaking the pressure with ease. He still managed almost 7 apg (while leading the nation in scoring) with unreliable teammates to pass to. Imagine what he could’ve done with someone like Beans in the paint and Morrow on the wing.
There’s a video of Bobby Knight breaking down Curry’s passing game, says he’s one of the best passers the college game has ever seen. It may take a while, but Its conceivable that he becomes a Steve Nash type point in less time than it took Nash to get there. Compared to Crawford, he may not have as many 50 point games in him, but I think he’ll be able to score on a more consistent basis, and will definitely improve the players around him more than Jamal (unfortunately, defensively it’s probably a wash).
If Stoudemire goes through
he should play the 4, while Randolph moves to the 5. Stoudemire is not going to come in and do Biedrins’ job.
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
amare played the center for the suns before shaq was there
under nellie’s system he would be an ideal center.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkSJSU on Jun 26, 2009 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions
He was being demolished by real centers
that is why Shaq needed come there. Randolph is developing his rebounding nicely that can complement Amare’s, while not displacing as much paint space as Shaq did. He’s reported to have put on 20lbs and grew an extra inch (omg!). He still won’t fare very well against true centers, but Biedrin’s didnt either.
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
andris did terrible against great centers on both ends. amare at least demolishes them and creates mismatches on the other end.
there arent many players that can posterize yao at will
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkSJSU on Jun 26, 2009 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions
no argument there
he can still do all of that at the 4, while relieving pressure of him defending the 5 (not adequately, though)
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
But, it did not translate to playoff success
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
but the warriors need to focus on getting to the playoffs
before worrying about playoff success. that’ll come once you consistently get there.
They needed Shaq because they had Diaw at the PF.
They wanted to have two big guys so that they could handle the other teams like the lakers who had two big guys. (Bynum & Gasol)
by ZaMzAm FiRe on Jun 27, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
WHAT ABOUT...
Turiaf? Did everyone forget about him? He doesn’t have to play heavy center minutes, but he can do what most centers are called upon to do…plug up the middle, block shots and guard bigger opponents! Add that he can step back and drain 10-15 footers is a plus for a 5!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jun 26, 2009 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions
The Phx suns said they are most likely not going to trade if Curry is not in deal.
But Warriors really want to keep him.
It would be nice to get Amare’ but
I am confident in the Warriors with the roster how it is, but maybe a little more adjustments.
GSW, SFG, SF49ers #1
Keep Curry, Get Nash
I think Curry is too much to give them: because the truth is Amare is 26 going on 35 body wise:
Were rolling the dice with Amare, would I take him for AB, BW, & MB? Yes, but not if it included Curry and only if we were sure to keep him:
The Suns would be Idiots not to accept that package: otherwise we go after Nash:
Yeah Phoenix would be dumb not to accept that trade
they’re getting the better end of the deal
c'mon warriors
i think we should go after Amare slot him at PF not C he isnt a center, then look into free agency for a quality C
Word he's a PF not a Center
And we’d be trading the only Center we have for him. Start Ronny at center with Amar’e every game? No thanks. We have our PF his name is ANTHONY RANDOLPH, straight beast!!!!!!
Why, when we could easily play Turiaf at center.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
Where are you going to get a center???
All who want Amare should sit back take a chill pill and let it go. Every only sees what he used to be. He is damaged goods. And we do not have a nash type pg yet? Also why is noone giving AR his credit. Lets see what we have in him.
We are not winning anything with Amare, so why go after him. If AR does not show improvement. Then next year there will be plenty out there
Biedrins, Marco, and Wright for Amare in a heartbeat
But if they want anything more I think we should deny it.
Message to Kerr, take it or leave it
Nash if we keep AB mBW & MB
The Key to this is for us to go after Nash if they balk:, because he will make everyone better, I truly believe we will go deep in the playff’s with Nash and the team we have now:
Can't disagree, Nash makes everyone better.
No way we get him unless it’s like Curry Jackson and BWright…. then maybe
Yes, take it or leave it. (Show em' your 'Poker Face' Riley!)
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
We have a lot of nice players at basically every position, some positions are too crowded so this is the perfect time to make a deal where where we trade a handful of good players for an all star. If we can get something that’s fair, we need to do it. If this trade doEsnt happen because we don’t want to part with azabukie I will cry.
by Agent Zero on Jun 26, 2009 6:47 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Curry Untouchable:
I agree, we pull the trigger for 4 players:
AB, BW,MC and KA: we fill the gapes with free agents: but that is it, No SCurry:
Or we really should wait
until he’s a free agent next year, cause there’s no deal without him agreeing to an extention. If he does then that means he could sign with us next summer and we can keep our young core
we don't need to wait that long
we have the best offer phoenix has seen. Wait til December/January, see how good the team is, then pull the trigger if we need to. I love our young guys, all of them, I wanna seem them do well, in Warriors jerseys. GIVE THEM A CHANCE!! Portland had chances to trade away their young core, they were patient, now their a top 10 NBA squad
Agreed
If Amare’s going to bolt anyways, we might as well keep what we have and try our luck in the FA market in 2010. We have plenty of time during the season to free up cap space. It’ll be a long shot, but not impossible.
Honestly I only read as far as your Kelenna-defense statement.
I just read the rest and its pretty much the best thing i’ve ever read. You brought up so many points that my little mind hasn’t been introduced to on this blog or thought about already. Maybe I should make a fanpost now about something that has 50 diaries and articles on the main page about.
This is the only thing I seem to agree with you on:
Phx Suns Recieve:
Biendrins C
Marco SG
Wright PF
Golden State Warriors Recieve:
Stoudemire PF/C
Are you happy now that you’ve gotten my approval? Great, knew you would. Next time I’ll bring cookies.
P.S. I didn’t think my initial comments warranted your “rag” comments. I figure if you really meant it, I should get my money’s worth. Ok, I’m done.
P.S.S. Who gives a crap about DeMarcus Nelson?
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
by kenntoe on Jun 26, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Honestly I only read as far as your Kelenna-defense statement.
This is the only thing I seem to agree with you on:
Phx Suns Recieve:
Biendrins C
Marco SG
Wright PF
Golden State Warriors Recieve:
Stoudemire PF/C
Are you happy now that you’ve gotten my approval? Great, knew you would. Next time I’ll bring cookies.
P.S. I didn’t think my initial comments warranted your “rag” comments. I figure if you really meant it, I should get my money’s worth. Ok, I’m done.
P.S.S. Who gives a crap about DeMarcus Nelson?
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
by kenntoe on Jun 26, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
stupid laggy computer.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
crap you're right, I didn't notice the double post.
PWND!
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
"It takes a special kind of anti-mojo for a team to miss the playoffs 14 out of 15 seasons. Like, say, the Warriors under Chris Cohan."
ESPN
watching sportscenter and they said that Curry will probably not be involved in the Amare trade. Pretty much the same things we already know. But they also said that Phoenix is shopping him around and one possible scenario is to Atlanta for Josh Smith.
if PHX can do better
more power to them, but no way we get into a bidding war beyond what we’ve offered … posted elsewhere that what we need to do is go after Bosh and let PHX and Toronto worry about not getting the best deal
wasn’t Atlanta supposedly trying to move Josh Smith to cut costs? how is Amare going to help them do that?
by homer simpson on Jun 26, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Phoenix just dealt Shaq with a $20 million expiring...
J-Smoov has a trade kicker that forces the team that trades for him to pay $6million.
Not really sure the cost-cutting Suns are willing to do that.
No Way--No deal--
If the suns don’t want Amare and are in blow up mode. So be it. Why woudl they not want to build around a guy that can score 25 points a night.
Becuase is is damaged goods
Amare is now a star that “IF” he would not had gotten the injury bug would have been GREAT! for a long time!! Now he is a Great player that unfirtunately has the injury bug and always will from now on
Let shoot for something else where we can keep our core
AmareBaron is now a star that "IF" he would not had gotten the injury bug would have been GREAT! for a long time!! Now he is a Great player that unfirtunately has the injury bug and always will from now on
Let shoot for something else where we can keep our core
Then why do people on this site fantasize about Baron all the time. There isn’t a week where there is atleast one post that is about a plan to get baron to return. I’m sick of it.
Cause Havoc. Bring Nash in and 120 point games will be very expected
by montadaboss on Jun 27, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions
You guys know
theres a reason the Suns are tryin to get rid of Amare. If he suppose to be so good they would be trying to keep him. Keep our young core together and let them grow. Our team is not as bad as it seems
BUIKE's VALUE
His value to the team is the DEPTH he brings to the bench. Without depth, this team even with Amare is looking at 1 and done, if they even make the playoffs.
The only thing I don’t like about Buike’s game is his slow trigger on his jump shot – i don’t know how he doesn’t get blocked every other attempt.
Still. 50% from 3, 50% from Field. Can guard 2 and 3’s.
Keep him
What if we back off...
The Suns may get desperate. They certainly don’t want to get NOTHING for Amar’e and teams do NOT want to pay max salary. Let’s wait a while.
Waite
let the Suns sweat a little and they will break and give us Amare for the players we offer and no Curry involved. We will have a team of Amare, Curry, Stephen Jackson, Monte Ellis. How does that sound? Sounds like a dominant offensive team in the west to me.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"
Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
Featured Stories
Most Commented
In Association With
Ball Don't Lie - NBA - Yahoo! Sport
- Days of NBA Lives: Wherein Roy Hibbert tap-dances to Maine
- Grizzlies Valentine’s Day cards are the key to love
- Kevin Love would like the NBA to take the MLB’s approach on All-Star games
- Kobe Bryant fires a few hilarious salvos at Jeremy Lin
- Brandon Jennings states the obvious regarding his 2014 free agency, everyone goes nuts
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
