The potential future of the Warriors and target players (i.e. John Wall)
As gratifying as it has been to see the Warriors front office attempt to be players in the offseason, we all must remember the current rumors and news we are being fed is "Faze 1" for the GSW organization. A lot of fans and loyalist become enamored to any proposition presented that includes our beloved squad, and I too find any bit of news intriguing. The deal of Jamal Crawford to the ATL for Texas Tech "college star" AC Law (and the expiring/insurance covered contract of Speedy Claxton) saves the Warriors some starter money to play in 2010. Also, in terms of team, Jamal was too much Allen Iverson and not enough Chauncey Billups. This was the first move of the offseason and should be interpreted as move to begin to balance this unorthodox roster.
Now to Amare. No matter the back and forth banter going on about Mr. Stoudemire, we all must look at the reality of any action that may take place. First, Amare is a 6'10 249 lb physical presence who is 27 years old, he has averaged 21 ppg, 8 rpg and 2 apg along with being a 4 time All Star. Yes he has had micro-fracture surgery and torn retina, but even with that in mind, he is STILL going to be more dominate than 95% of all low post presence in the League. Giving up Bean's, Wright and Marco is the only true reality the Warriors can reasonably provide; Monta, Randolph, Morrow, Captin' Jack and Corey I just don't see them being moved in any way (at this moment in time) due to many different individual factors and reasons. Many of the Warriors fan base also still yearns to actually see this core as currently constructed all play together healthy to see what can happen, but lets be realistic, all healthy the Warriors are not a playoff team now or in the near future, PERIOD. The big issue pertaining to the Amare deal is not newly acquired Stephen Curry being factored in the deal (not going to ever happen in this scenario) but the large contract extension Amare is going to demand which would end up being around the $95 million range.... are those figures even in Cohan and Rowell's vocabulary? If so, than the Warriors can be proud to have at least made a significant enough move that may aid in the ever challenging rise up the Western Conference ladder.
Now no one around the Warriors front office, GoldenStateOfMind family or t.v. & radio media have talked much about the Warriors inclusion in the epic crop of available NBA talent in the 2010 free agency coming soon. I think the reasoning is obvious; the Bay area is not a market that David Stern has any true interest if helping develop and promote, thus making the Warrior franchise way less than an afterthought for most NBA celebrities. I also do not accept the time zone issue being a factor for the "East Coast Bias" since L.A. Lakers have no problem as well all know. The Warriors fun style and arena atmosphere are trademarks that help expose and shine a spotlight on the Bay, but the overshadowing front office soap opera issues make up the Warriors "Yin-Yang" perception. Yet, regardless, if the money is there to play with, than landing a possible star free agent MUST be discussed into the plans of this franchise. LeBron is the only one I feel is out of the question, not going to happen, but again, if the money is right, Wade (yes even him), Bosh (who we should look at now in trade talks), Dirk, Chandler, Roy (restricted), Gay (restricted) etc, etc, etc, are all "options". Management must take the initiative to market to these players as aggressively as they can, which the cause of concern for most is do the ones in charge have not just the desire to do so, but even more so, the imagination and creativity to appeal the franchise they are in charge of. Most blame the management of not caring to improve an actual team because the business and bottom line mean more to them. Yet in reality, a lack of personality along with creativity and craftiness do not give these individuals much to work with in competing to win the desire of an NBA superstars ego an interest. Dollars talk, we all know that, but being in the Bay Area should be (I emphasize should be) presented for all the greatness that comes along with it and if done correctly, should be a huge advantage in capturing the interest of at least one of those free agents.....DAMN YOU DAVID STERN, you are no help!!!
Next, I would like to be the first to say this.........If the Warriors stink it up (again) this upcoming year and if (big "if") we get lucky and get a #1, #2 or #3 pick, we are in for a plethora of options. The 2010 NBA draft may be one of the most strongest top to bottom in the past couple decades! There are legit superstar contenders here, many know a few names, but most do not follow and research enough to understand, I will try to help.
First off, everyone wants that #1 Spot, and in this case, that is the absolute truth. Who cares that we have Monta and Curry, the #1 pick of the Warriors should and would be, may I present to you, John Wall. If you all do not know by now, here is a little preview.
This player is major in regards to scouts and NBA personnel. Comparisons can be made and attempted, but when watched extensively like I have for the past couple years, I see Derrick Rose and Dwayne Wade combined. Speed, handles and athleticism are obvious, but the furiosity and power that Wall plays with is resembled by few. His learning curve is at an advantage already because of this which he now already knows to bring on both sides of the floor. He is headed to an unusually loaded Kentucky squad with new head coach Calipari and will be presented with an even larger spotlight which will most certainly increase his image as the obvious #1 pick in the 2010 NBA Draft. May the drool fest begin.
Other than Wall, this draft is headlined by a field of big men talent that will overshadow the talent at the guard position (except for Wall). Names like Ed Davis (North Carolina), Cole Aldrich (Kansas), Derrick Favors (Georgia Tech), Al-Farouq Aminu (Wake Forest), Greg Monroe (Georgetown), Donatas Motiejunas (Lithuania) (yes I'm even aware of the overseas talent too). All are on another level then anyone found in this past draft (except for Griffin). On top of the big men available, we have to mention Lance Stevenson (via NYC but not decided on college, may go overseas), Xavier Henry (6'6 220 lbs FR SG going to Kansas with NBA made body and game), DeMarcus Cousins (6'10 250 PF FR going to, yes, Kentucky...straight BEAST!), Kemba Walker (UCONN), Willie Warren (Oklahoma), the list goes on and on.
The Golden State Warriors are engulfed right now with a few options today, but a sea of possibilities later. Whatever choice they make today with Amare or Bosh or maybe even Boozer are great and I will be thrilled and excited, but even without I get to see Randolph, Morrow, Ellis and Curry shine regardless which we all should feel privileged and excited about. Also if our beloved Bay Area squad continues to shed the cap space and grow those dollars for the 2010 season along with gain some luck and/or make some moves for the 2010 NBA draft, we all will not be let down. I do not see any logical scenario in which going up is not the path traveled, we have a team (forget the franchise and management) that captures our attention and thrills us every step of the way. Frustration may come and go, but the entertainment and satisfaction of being apart of this team is undeniable.
Just think about it, think about it all!!
****John Wall is not a movement, its a revolution baby! ****
Watch the link and see the truth
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
4 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very nice blog
I do realize that we can either do trades now and sign with the FA’s that are available right now or should we wait for the o’10 FA roster with possibly a better amount of players? I wonder if we trade some now at this point in time, how many times we will actually succeed versus waiting a couple of years when the time is right and how many times we will succeed for more years to come. This would sound almost stupid but if John Wall was available for the o’10 draft and he is the best, BEST, in the draft and other drafts possibly, I would probably make the o9 and o’10 season fail just to try to get him. Who knows we can possibly succeed after getting him or other better FA’s.
The major problem is that we haven't been winners
Minor success recently hasn’t changed the perception around the country that we’re a bottom dweller. And the media has been harsh towards the warriors front office, which with all the Rowell stuff aside is making good personnel decisions right now. If are team can develop into a perennial playoff team, or look like they can then our reputation and status with the commissioner will grow to where it deserves to be.
by T-Money on Jun 27, 2009 3:56 PM PDT reply actions
We don't know how to TANK. We don't know how to compete.
We only know how to be in limbo. Not bad enough to land a draft stud. Not good enough to win an NBA Championship.
Lottery purgatory. Where Golden State Amazing Happens.
Yeah, we got too many middling players to do something like Vinsanity for young player & crap. Or Paul Pierce’s mysterious lingering injury the Oden/Durant year (even though that didn’t work out for them). We dump Crawford, still have Jack, Maggette, ME & Beans to keep us in lottery purgatory.
We don’t know how to TANK.
Nellie does know, he just did it way too late (for those that don’t know, Tanking = playing young players & sitting or getting rid of vets).
by homer simpson on Jun 28, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions























