NBA Draft Superthread III
2009 NBA Draft:
June 25, 2009
ESPN
4 p.m.-9 p.m. PST
Current Draft Order:
1. Los Angeles Clippers
2. Memphis Grizzlies
3. Oklahoma City Thunder
4. Sacramento Kings
5. Washington Wizards
6. Minnesota Timberwolves
7. Golden State Warriors
8. New York Knicks
9. Toronto Raptors
10. Milwaukee Bucks
11. New Jersey Nets
12. Charlotte Bobcats
13. Indiana Pacers
14. Phoenix Suns
Our Projected Pre-Off-Season 2010 Depth Chart:
PG: Monta Ellis, Jamal Crawford, CJ Watson
SG: Stephen Jakson, Anthony Morrow, Marco Belinelli
SF: Kelenna Azubuike, Corey Maggette
PF: Anthony Randolph, Brandan Wright
C: Andris Biedrins, Ronny Turiaf
Why the Warriors should draft a PG:
If there's a position we are thin at it will be at the PG position. We are lacking playmaking PG's while we are stocked well in scoring PG's.
Our PG's: Ellis, Morrow, Watson, Crawford
Why the Warriors should draft a SG or SF:
Personnel wise we are OK at both positions, especially at the 3. When it comes to true SG's. We have none other than Marco. Drafting a SG is certainly an option.
Our 2's: Ellis, Morrow, Crawford, Belinelli, Jackson, Azubuike
Our 3's: Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike, Randolph [Possible]
Why the Warriors should draft a PF:
Power Forward is a position we have great talent and potential at with Randolph and Wright. Depth over a future starter would be the ideal reason to draft a 4, but there are other needs.
Our 4's: Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf, (All 3's if we play small)
Why the Warriors should draft a C:
The Warriors should draft a Center, but not as a starter, but a backup. This years draft is incredibly weak at the Center spot with only 2 1st round talents in Thabeet and Mullens. You do not draft a backup at #7, but once again if we go BPA and Thabeet is available at our slot not at #1 then he may be the pick.
Our 5's: Biedrins, Turiaf, Randolph, (All 4's if we play small)
Why the Warriors should Trade The Pick:
The Warriors should trade down if at our slot there is no perfect candidate to pick with (Mainly a non-top 3 pick). A trade down to the mid-later 1st would give us many specialists to pick and some pre-season high rated prospects such as Mullens, Teague, Aminu, Lawson, Collison. We can also trade for current NBA players who management target.
Draft Tek's Big Board
(Updated May 17th)
| Rnk | Player | College | Psn 1 | Psn 2 | H | Wt |
| 1 | Blake Griffin | Oklahoma | PF | 6-10 | 252 | |
| 2 | Ricky Rubio | DKV Joventut | PG | 6-3 | 180 | |
| 3 | Jordan Hill | Arizona | PF | 6-10 | 235 | |
| 4 | Hasheem Thabeet | Connecticut | C | 7-3 | 265 | |
| 5 | James Harden | Arizona State | SG | 6-5 | 220 | |
| 6 | DeMar DeRozan | USC | SG | 6-6 | 210 | |
| 7 | Brandon Jennings | Virtus Roma | PG | 6-1 | 170 | |
| 8 | Earl Clark | Louisville | SF | 6-10 | 230 | |
| 9 | Stephen Curry | Davidson | PG | SG | 6-1 | 180 |
| 10 | Gerald Henderson | Duke | SG | 6-4 | 210 | |
| 11 | Tyreke Evans | Memphis | SG | 6-6 | 219 | |
| 12 | Jonny Flynn | Syracuse | PG | 6-0 | 185 | |
| 13 | James Johnson | Wake Forest | SF | 6-8 | 235 | |
| 14 | Eric Maynor | VCU | PG | 6-3 | 180 | |
| 15 | Ty Lawson | North Carolina | PG | 6-0 | 195 | |
| 16 | Jeff Teague | Wake Forest | PG | 6-2 | 175 | |
| 17 | DeJuan Blair | Pittsburgh | PF | 6-6 | 287 | |
| 18 | B.J. Mullens | Ohio State | C | 7-0 | 275 | |
| 19 | Chase Budinger | Arizona | SG | SF | 6-7 | 218 |
| 20 | Terrence Williams | Louisville | SG | SF | 6-6 | 220 |
| 21 | Wayne Ellington | North Carolina | SG | 6-5 | 194 | |
| 22 | Gani Lawal | Georgia Tech | PF | 6-9 | 233 | |
| 23 | Jrue Holliday | UCLA | PG | SG | 6-3 | 205 |
| 24 | Patrick Mills | St. Mary's | PG | 5-11 | 180 | |
| 25 | Sam Young | Pittsburgh | SF | 6-6 | 220 | |
| 26 | Tyler Hansbrough | North Carolina | PF | 6-8 | 245 | |
| 27 | Darren Collison | UCLA | PG | 6-0 | 170 | |
| 28 | DaJuan Summers | Georgetown | SF | 6-8 | 225 | |
| 29 | Austin Daye | Gonzaga | SF | 6-10 | 200 | |
| 30 | Derrick Brown | Xavier | SF | 6-8 | 227 |
ESPN's Big Board
| RK | Player | AGE | POS | HT | WT | SCHOOL/COUNtrY | PROJECTION | |
| 1 | ![]() |
Blake Griffin | 20 | PF | 6-10 | 248 | Oklahoma | Top 5 |
| May 13 update Griffin looks like the closest thing to Superman the NBA has ... more | ||||||||
| 2 | ![]() |
Ricky Rubio | 18 | PG | 6-4 | 180 | Spain | Top 5 |
| May 25 Update: Will he sign with the team that drafts him? To terminate ... more | ||||||||
| 3 | ![]() |
Hasheem Thabeet | 22 | C | 7-3 | 267 | Connecticut | Top 5 |
| May 14 Update: Thabeet is one of the most polarizing players in the draft. ... more | ||||||||
| 4 | ![]() |
James Harden | 19 | SG | 6-5 | 222 | Arizona State | Top 10 |
| May 15 Update:We've had Harden ranked in the Top 5 of our Top 100 ... more | ||||||||
| 5 | ![]() |
Jordan Hill | 21 | PF | 6-10 | 232 | Arizona | Top 10 |
| May 21 update: Among the most improbable storylines of the NBA draft has been ... more | ||||||||
| 6 | ![]() |
Stephen Curry | 21 | PG | 6-3 | 181 | Davidson | Lottery |
| Apr 23 Update: It shouldn't come as a huge surprise that Curry has decided ... more | ||||||||
| 7 | ![]() |
Tyreke Evans | 19 | SG | 6-5 | 220 | Memphis | Lottery |
| Apr 20 Update: Evans has made the argument over the last two weeks of ... more | ||||||||
| 8 | ![]() |
Jrue Holiday | 18 | PG | 6-4 | 199 | UCLA | Lottery |
| May 18 update: In a draft without many players with big upside, Holiday has ... more | ||||||||
| 9 | ![]() |
Jonny Flynn | 20 | PG | 6-1 | 196 | Syracuse | Lottery |
| May 25 update: Over the past few weeks, a number of GMs seem ... more | ||||||||
| 10 | ![]() |
DeMar DeRozan | 19 | SG | 6-6 | 211 | USC | Lottery |
| Apr 8 Update: DeRozan is riding a terrific March back into the lottery. He ... more | ||||||||
| 11 | ![]() |
DeJuan Blair | 20 | PF | 6-7 | 277 | Pittsburgh | Lottery to mid first round |
| May 18 Update The problem for Blair is in the definition of "big man." ... more | ||||||||
| 12 | ![]() |
Brandon Jennings | 19 | PG | 6-2 | 165 | Italy | Lottery to mid first round |
| May 28 Update: Jennings is all over the map for NBA teams, and seeing ... more | ||||||||
| 13 | ![]() |
Jeff Teague | 20 | PG | 6-2 | 175 | Wake Forest | Lottery to mid first round |
| Apr 8 Update: Teague got off to a terrific start this year and a ... more | ||||||||
| 14 | ![]() |
Austin Daye | 20 | SF | 6-11 | 192 | Gonzaga | Lottery to mid first round |
| May 14 Update: Daye has had one of the biggest swings of any player ... more | ||||||||
| 15 | ![]() |
Earl Clark | 21 | SF | 6-10 | 226 | Louisville | Lottery to mid first round |
| May 18 Update: The question about Clark always has been about heart. Does he ... more | ||||||||
| 16 | ![]() |
Eric Maynor | 21 | PG | 6-3 | 164 | VA Commonwealth | Lottery to mid first round |
| Mar 23 Update: Maynor is another guy who came up big in a losing ... more | ||||||||
| 17 | ![]() |
James Johnson | 22 | PF | 6-8 | 257 | Wake Forest | Lottery to mid first round |
| April 4 Update: Johnson is a very intriguing prospect. He's a great athlete, has ... more | ||||||||
| 18 | ![]() |
Gerald Henderson | 21 | SG | 6-5 | 215 | Duke | Lottery to mid first round |
| April 25 Update: After two pretty non descript years at Duke, Henderson blew up ... more | ||||||||
| 19 | ![]() |
Tyler Hansbrough | 23 | PF | 6-10 | 234 | North Carolina | Mid to late first round |
| May 15 Update: Word out of North Carolina, where he's working out, is that ... more | ||||||||
| 20 | ![]() |
B. J. Mullens | 20 | C | 7-1 | 258 | Ohio State | Mid to late first round |
| Mar 26 Update: Mullens was projected as a Top 5 pick at the start ... more | ||||||||
EJ's Draft Board with Personal Scouting reports:
1. Blake Griffin
2. Ricky Rubio
3. Hasheem Thabeet
4. James Harden
5. Jordan Hill
6. Brandon Jennings
7, DeMar Derozan
8. Tyreke Evans
9. Johnny Flynn
10. Jrue Holiday
Demar DeRozan
Demar is another Pac-10 prospect and could've been a favorite among SC fans if he did not declare. Was a highly regarded SG/SF prospect coming out of High School. Two words to describe Demar: Offensive Powerhouse. Demar is an excellent offensive option from 17 feet to the hoop. His mid range game is the best in the class, he's a highly effective slasher and gets to the hoop well with fluidity and grace, and he's deadly in transition. His freakish athleticism and long wingspan should make him a good defender, but his footwork needs some tweaking. Demar is in my opinion a 'project' prospect, very high ceiling and great tools, but inconsistency, a less than stellar 3-Point range, inability to create for teammates, and below average ball handling may make him bust. Drafting DeMar would give us a legit SG and could possibly free up Monta for a trade.
Tyreke Evans
Tyreke Evans was another highly touted HS prospect. Was ranked in top 5 by most major scouting agencies and major sports networks. Tyreke is a score first PG, but may has the ability to play SG in the NBA. Tyreke has excellent size at 6'6" and a Wingspan of 7'3". He has great range and has the ability to hit from downtown, is excellent in transition, and finishes very well at the hole. Him and Jennings are probably the most exciting players in this draft. He's able to defend both guard positions which was seen alot with the Tigers and is apt in grabbing steals. Tyreke has all the tools to be an offensive juggernaut, but he has to cut his turnovers down (Worst in this years Draft class), needs to work on his lackluster PG skillset, needs to be more disciplined on the court (He's spontaneuous), and has off court issues.
Johnny Flynn
The former Orange star has risen up draft boards with fellow PG prospect Holiday within the last weeks. He was the 4th best PG in the High School class of 07 according to both Rivals and Scout scouting sites. He is very similar to size to Ty Lawson, but Flynn outhsines Lawson in athleticism. Flynn's college campaign ended with a spectacular Sweet 16 run, Syracuse's first sicne 04, in which they beat Harden's best Pac-10 team, the Sun Devils, before gettign eliminated by Griffin's Sooners. Johnny's strenths are in his excellent athelticism and speed when combined with his leadership, court vision, and driving ability he is the perfect playmaker designed for an uptempo team like the Warriors. However, like Lawson he is undersized. He also needs to work on his outside jumper, his occasional erattic playstyle, his defense, and watch his turnovers.
Blake Griffin
Blake is the unofficial #1 prospect in this draft. He's likely to go #1 and will not go past #2 in any situation. Blake is a big and mobile PF who loves to do the dirty work down low and was the most efficient player in the NCAA. The former Sooner has an NBA Ready body that will get you rebounds, will get you points in the paint, and will get his hands dirty on Defense. A great character and teammate, high work ethic, to add to his freakish athleticism for his size. Handles the ball well and passes well for a big man. However, he is not a perfect specimen; he still has not developed a good mid range game (Can't hit well beyond 13-14 feet), is only a 60% FT shooter, Defensive technique is inadequate, has had knee injuries, and is turnover prone.
James Harden
James Harden was the best player in the Pac 10 this year. Was highly efficient on both sides of the ball. Offensively he's able to get to the rim with relative ease and his body control is outstanding, he's able to twist his body which make him an excellent slasher and a perfect guy to have on the fast break. He's a SG who has great court vision, great passing ability, high basketball IQ, and is not erratic with his shot selection. Defensively, he is one of the best, he can guard well Man to Man, is strout, is active on terrorizing passing lanes, and looks as if he actually wants to play D. He has decent range (Can hit downtown as well), but has an inconsistent jumper. He also has average, or maybe less than average, agility and athelticisim. He's also very turnover prone and his handling skills are questionable.
Jordan Hill
Jordan Hill is likely to be the second PF taken off the board. Jordan is another athletic big with an ideal NBA body. The former Wildcat contested well for top Pac-10 player, but I have Harden narrowly beating him out. Jordan, a Junior, has showed great improvement since his Freshman year. He has developed a very solid mid range game, is working on post moves, is a stout shot blocker, is quick and mobile for his size, and is an excellent rebounder. However, he has not developed advanced post moves yet, is old for the draft class, is still inexperienced (Only started playing in High School), is a 65% FT shooter, and still needs to make smarter decisions and work on fundamentals (FT Shooting, Passing, Footwork).
Jrue Holiday
Like Flynn, Holiday has shot up many draft boards including mine. Jrue was ranked the best PG in the HS class of 08 and 2nd overall for Rivals while ranked the best SG and ranked 2nd overall for Scout Inc. A GSoM favorite, the former Bruin although recruited as a combo guard has told scouts and GM's that "I'm a Floor General." His willingness to focus on the PG spot is very encouraging to teams as his ceiling is one of the highest in the draft, another Boom or Bust pick. Blessed with a huge wingspan, 2nd longest amongst Lottery PG's, he will cause matchup problems for the opposing defense as well as have the ability to guard multiple positions on defense, which he already excels at. He has great PG skills in his vision and passing, is extremely smart, and is unselfish. However, his less than stellar College campaign has strayed away people. He also is average when it comes to athleticism, his jumper, and his 3point shot.
Brandon Jennings
Brandon Jennings was the #1 prospect coming out of HS according to Scout Inc and ESPN and the 4th best accourding to rivals last year and became a High School to EuroLeague Trailblazer. A true PG who is amazingly fast, athletic, and flashy. Dangerous off the dribble and in transition, a terror in the press, and wonderful in stealing the ball (Ranked #1: 5.1 Steals/40 Minutes). He gets to the hole with relative ease while being able to create for himself and for others which makes him a nautral playmaker. Another boom or bust pick, one who screams allstar and another which can yell bust. Skeptics ask; Did the decision cost him? Although he has matured significantly and played in the second best league he is still turnover prone, is undersized and skinny, is an average jumpshooter, and is a lackluster rebounder.
Ty Lawson
Former Tar Heel and Champion, Ty Lawson, is one of 3 excellent true PG's in this years class. As shown in his fantastic big dance performence he is the fastest person in this draft, is a terror on the open court, is phenomonal in the press and in stealing the ball, and is great in creating oppurtunities for others. His PG skillset is excellent in terms of his passing ability, court vision, and ability to draw defenders to himself via his speed which allows him to make easy passes. He has a solid jumpshot with 3-Point range, takes care of the ball very well, and terrific at getting to the hole. Although, he has good bulk for his size, frankly, he is short. He's under 6 foot (5'11") which will give him a hard time offensively against taller defenders. Although a Junior he is still inexpereinced and needs to inspire his teammates in ways other than on the court.
Ricky Rubio
Pistol Pete, Steve Nash, Jason Kidd. These are the comparisons that he is being drawn to and may be rightfully so. Best PG skillset in this draft as well as one of the youngest. Ricky is a wonderful passer, has eagle eye court vision, a great knowledge of the game, has faced many tough opponents, and is a tenacious defender. He is excellent in transition and Ricky has the best Assist/40 Minutes in this draft class, which sits at 10.8/40 Minutes and that's saying something in the Slower paced Euroleague. He's a wild defender, think Sasha Vujacic, and like the other 2 excellent PG's is great in the press and at stealing the ball. He also has the best size of the 3 standing tall at 6'3". He does have weakness though; he's coming off an inury to his wrist, is less than average with his jumper, and is highly turnover prone (2.8/2.4 Ratio in the Euroleague and 2.6/3.0 in the lesser Spanish league). He's also young and inexperienced and has the tendency to be too flashy at times.
Hasheem Thabeet
Hasheem "The Dream" Thabeet was probably my second favorite prospect coming in this year. Hasheem has good athleticism for his size and position and is one of the most mobile Centers I have seen in a long time. His big body also allows him to grab rebounds. Hasheem is a marvelous shotblocker and uses his excellent 7'3" height to help him in doing so. His shotblocking and Defense has drawn comparisons to Mt. Mutombo. He's also shown vast amounts of improvement since joining the Huskie basketball program. As gifted as he is Defensively, it's hard to say that about his offense. He still has not developed much post moves outside of his baby hook and really needs to work on his offensive repertoire. He also needs to work on handling the ball better. He's inexperienced as he's only been playing several years. Lastly, he seems to fade in big games and has been outshined by DeJuan Blair of Pitt.
EJ's Mock Draft
Pick #1 - Clippers: Blake Griffin
Unanimous #1 goes to the lottery Winner, the Clippers.
Alt. Pick: Rubio, Trade the Pick
Notes: Expect Z-Bo, Camby, or Kaman to get traded. Baron Davis is also a candidate to go.
Pick #2 - Grizzlies: Hasheem Thabeet
Rubio's diva attitude seems to be driving away Memphis, but Thabeet would be an excellent pick, he gives the Grizzlies an excellent front court which will enable Marc to slide to PF. Thabeet, Gasol, and Gay would be a solid 345.
Alt. Pick: Trade Down, Rubio
Notes: A trade down to Sacramento would be ideal as the Kings are searching for a new PG. If Thunder are really interested in Rubio, they are an option as well.
Pick #3 - Thunder: Ricky Rubio
The Thunder need a big man and the Grizzlies have drafted Thabeet. This leaves em with the oppurtunity to pick the best player avaialble and that's Ricky. Ricky would be foolish to pass up an oppurtunity to play for a very talented and young squad. This will move Westbrook to the 2 positon and would give the Thunder a nice 1-2-3.
Alt. Pick: Hasheem Thabeet, Jordan Hill, Trade Up/Down, James Harden
Notes: Thunder are also in a position to trade up for Thabeet or Rubio or Trade down with Sacramento if Rubio is available.
Pick #4- Kings: Jrue Holiday
Kings are begging for a PG. With Rubio off the board, they go for the high draft riser in Jrue. He provides better Defense then Rubio, but the playmaking still needs to be seen.
Alt. Pick: Ricky Rubio, Trade Up, Brandon Jennings, Jordan Hill
Notes: The Kings really want Rubio, they can easily trade up to positons 2 or 3 if Rubio is there. Also, look for a possible move of Beno.
Pick #5- Wizards: Jordan Hill
Wizards are looking for in my opinion the BPA. They can draft an heir at the 1, find a true 2, get 3 depth, get a brusing 4 or 5. And it looks like they'll solidify their frontline with Hill. Hill will give them a versatile frontline and some help for the screaming Butler.
Alt. Pick: James Harden, Trade Down
Notes: Also look to see if they will trade a big especially if they draft Hill.
Pick #6- Timberwolves: James Harden
Unlike the earlier 5, with the exception of Sacramento, the T'Wolves have an excellent frontcourt. Look for the T-Wolves to draft a Wing. And they've lucked out, James Harden has fallen out of the top 5 and they get what in my opinion is one of the safest picks in the draft.
Alt Pick: DeMar DeRozan, Tyreke Evans, Trade Up, Jrue Holiday, Brandon Jennings
Notes: If they feel so, they may give up on Telfair and try their stab at one of the Combo Guards in Evans and Holiday and see if they can win the job from him, if not they can play the 2. A Jennings would autoamtically mean they want competition. Look for them to trade up as well, their 3 1st rounders are gold.
Pick #7- Warriors: Brandon Jennings
The Warriors will be looking for PG help and they have alot to choose from. Jennings [and Flynn] would be ideal for this offense. Warriors are not sold on any one person yet so this will fluctuate within the next few weeks.
Alt. Pick: Jrue Holiday, Johnny Flynn, Tyreke Evans, DeMar Derozan, Ty Lawson, Jordan Hill, Trade Up
Notes: Look for the Warriors to dangle Ellis and/or Biedrins especially if they draft Jennings or DeRozen.
Pick #8- Knicks: Stephen Curry
The Knick fans and D'Antoni will be ecstatic to have Curry. They get a great shooter with adequate PG skills, perfect for D'Antoni's Offense.
Pick #9- Raptors: DeMar Derozan
The Raptors are lacking a real 3. And DeRozan has the potential to be one of the best 3's to come out of this draft. Will be a flashy player that will draw the crowd in.
Pick #10- Bucks: Johnny Flynn
They are rumored to be looking for a PG and it may be Flynn.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
173 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The possibilities
get me exited, giddy as a school boy, and terrified all at once.
Go Dubs, make the right pick. Get a PG.
imo this is what will, and should, happen
Pick #1 – Clippers: Blake Griffin
Pick #2 – Grizzlies: Rubio (and trade to Kings)
Pick #3 – Thunder: Harden
Pick #4- Kings: Thabeeth (and trade to Grizzlies)
Pick #5- Wizards: Jordan Hill
Pick #6- Timberwolves: DeRozen
Pick #7- Warriors: Jrue Holiday
Pick #8- Knicks: Stephen Curry
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
the Thunder wouldn't let Thabeet by
so that would mess up the Kings-Grizz trade scenario you’ve got going there
i think the thunder
would want harden more than thabeeth actually…so maybe they get involved in a 3 way deal then?
Pick #1 – Clippers: Blake Griffin
Pick #2 – Grizzlies: Rubio (and trade to Kings)
Pick #3 – Thunder: Thabeeth (trade to Kings, who trade to Grizz)
Pick #4- Kings: Harden (trade to Thunder)
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
NBA Mock Draft 2009
Update: Sixth
Last updated: Wednesday; June 3, 2009
1.) Los Angeles Clippers — Blake Griffin, PF/Oklahoma
2.) Memphis Grizzlies — Hasheem Thabeet, C/Connecticut
3.) Oklahoma City Thunder — James Harden, SG/Arizona State
4.) Sacramento Kings — Ricky Rubio, PG/Spain
5.) Washington Wizards — Jordan Hill, PF/Arizona
6.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DeMar DeRozan, SG/USC
7.) Golden State Warriors — Stephen Curry, PG/Davidson
8.) New York Knicks — Brandon Jennings, PG/United States of America
9.) Toronto Raptors — Earl Clark, SF/Louisville
10.) Milwaukee Bucks — Jrue Holiday, PG/UCLA
11.) New Jersey Nets — Ty Lawson, PG/North Carolina
12.) Charlotte Bobcats — James Johnson, SF/Georgia Tech
13.) Indiana Pacers — Gerald Henderson, SG/Duke
14.) Phoenix Suns — Jonny Flynn, PG/Syracuse
15.) Detroit Pistons — Wayne Ellington, SG/North Carolina
16.) Chicago Bulls — Chase Budinger, SG/Arizona
17.) Philadelphia 76ers — Tyreke Evans, PG/Memphis
18.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Eric Maynor, PG/VCU
19.) Atlanta Hawks — B.J. Mullens, C/Ohio State
20.) Utah Jazz — Jeff Teague, PG/Wake Forest
21.) New Orleans Hornets — Terrence Williams, SG/Louisville
22.) Dallas Mavericks — DeJuan Blair, PF/Pittsburgh
23.) Sacramento Kings — Omri Casspi, SF/Israel
24.) Portland Trailblazers — Gani Lawal, PF/Georgia Tech
25.) Oklahoma City Thunder — Patrick Mills, PG/St. Mary’s
26.) Chicago Bulls — Derrick Brown, SF/Xavier
27.) Memphis Grizzlies — Tyler Hansbrough, PF/North Carolina
28.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DaJuan Summers, SF/Georgetown
29.) Los Angeles Lakers — Taj Gibson, PF/USC
30.) Cleveland Cavaliers — Sam Young, SF/Pittsburgh
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 3, 2009 10:34 PM PDT reply actions
his ceiling is a skinny ass Ben Gordon
"We Deserve"
They all probably have high ceilings
Given that they’re professional NBA players (and Curry will be one as well), they can afford rich houses which typically have high ceilings. So Curry’s ceiling will likely be the same height as Ben Gordon’s AND Ray Allen’s.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 4, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions
morrows ceiling is ray allen!
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
Ray Allen isn’t just a ridiculous shooter, he’s also got the size you want in a 2 and he’s a much better athlete…
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 6:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Monta can't shoot?
Come on, I rail on the fact that Monta’s awful at D but the guy’s jump shot isn’t suspect at all. While he doesn’t routinely take a lot of 3s, I think he has one of the better mid-range jumpers in the league. I also saw his jumper look better from distance last year – I think he’s close to having a reliable 3.
I can’t directly comment on Holiday. I’ve read that he’s an awful shooter and I’ve read he’s actually a pretty good shooter. I didn’t watch enough UCLA games to have an opinion.
Monta Ellis is a good shooter.
totally agree with u
monta is an offensive powerhouse as long as he has a PG to back him up
every draft combine stuff says that holidays jumper is looking very good….and he has already proven that he can finish as good as anyone around the rim…
holiday + monta would be an excellent backcourt….and out of all the options in the draft…probably the best defensively
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
holiday + monta would be an excellent backcourt
They could be an excellent back-court. Since most guys drafted don’t work out to, and even guys drafted #7 aren’t likely to be excellent, I think stating anything more than “could” is premature.
by jae on Jun 4, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions
sorry, you're right
they COULD be an excellent backcourt
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
you’re right, “can’t shoot” isn’t accurate. Can’t shoot the 3, though. Not many teams succeed when their starting backcourt is as incapable of stretching the floor the way a Monta/Holiday backcourt would be. ….Then again I doubt Holiday would be starting for at least a year so maybe one of them could develop better range….. In general I’m not a huge fan of collecting multiple smalls that aren’t much of a 3 point threat, but it is one of the few skills where NBA players do sometimes show dramatic improvement during their career.
Thing A
There’s no legit reason to avoid a guard in the draft just because their 3point range isn’t proven yet. Shooting can be worked on and it can be improved. And I don’t buy that a Holiday/Ellis backcourt would be easy to defend. Monta’s 18-20footer is pretty deadly and just about as effective in stretching the D as a 3pointer.
Even Ason Kidd is a lights out 3 point shooter these days..
"We Deserve"
Guys can also get much better defensively so there’s no legit reason to avoid a guard in the draft just because they don’t project to be a strong defensive player immediately. I’m not so concerned with Holiday/Ellis being easy to defend as I am about how they won’t open the floor up for the rest of the guys.
Thing A
Good point
Look at guys like Kobe and Tony Parker – they had average to poor jump shots when they came in the league and now they’re each money shooting the ball.
(Please don’t respond telling me that ______ isn’t Kobe or Parker – that’s not what I’m saying – I’m saying players can and have improved their jump shots once they got to the league.)
??
Kobe’s 3 pt shooting has never improved dramatically. There are several cases where a player improved their 3 point shooting greatly after entering the league, but you picked two pretty awful examples.
Thing A
Bad examples when you misread what I wrote, I agree
I didn’t mention 3-pt shooting once in my post. I’m talking about an overall consistent jump shot.
Whatever the percentages say, the quality of Kobe’s and Parker’s shot has dramatically improved, in my opinion.
- 1 Griffin
- a basketball player
- a different basketball player
- …
I don’t think I can take another 3 weeks of mock drafts.
by jae on Jun 3, 2009 10:38 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Dude
I don’t know what you’re smoking. Memphis needs “a different basketball player,” they’ve already got good players at “a basketball player’s” position. Besides, I think “a basketball player” has bust written all over him, if he drops to the Warriors, I pray they don’t pick him.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 4, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions
A different basketball player is really athletic. I think he has a high ceiling. If he drops, we should really consider taking him. Unfortunately, chances are we’ll be stuck with “yet another basketball player”, who has potential, but might be a reach.
Yet another basketball player has an NBA body, a freakish wingspan, and ridiculous upside.
Thing 1
by Sleepy Freud on Jun 4, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes,
But 1&Done phenom #1 has way more longpotentialupside than yet another basketball player. Plus he’s younger. And you can’t teach youth.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 4, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions
No way
Yet another basketball player has crazy upside. I can see him being just like either NBA player of similar race and build or NBA player from the same school as yet another basketball player.
Thing A
Problem is, NBA player of similar race and build to and from the same school as yet another basketball player is a subpar rebounder and defender. His PER looks good, but that’s because PER, like the average NBA GM, tends to rewards volume shooters who score a lot of points. By WP48, yet another basketball player is below average for his position. Not surprisingly, the plusminus numbers indicate that yet another basketball player’s team performed significantly better without him on the floor.
I don’t know, for some reason lately I’ve been feeling a different basketball player.
Thing 1
He should probably have waited another year to come out, I hear that Any player we pick should compliment the rest of the team.
by jae on Jun 4, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Ha
I’m quickly becoming a big fan of your compliment/complement joke. It actually gets better with repetition.
Thing 2
Why do people always have to compare prospects to active or past players of similar race?
I think yet another player is going to be more like random crappy guy of a different race from way back in the 50s.
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 4, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Isn’t he a foreigner? I thought yet another player’s game is reminiscent of every other Euro.
by jae on Jun 4, 2009 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions
"Our 4's: Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf, (All 3's if we play small)"
huh? wouldn’t they be 5’s if the team was playing small?
by Rob Kurz blocks Yao Ming on Jun 3, 2009 10:39 PM PDT reply actions
Nellie plays the 3’s/Small Forwards at the 4 position when he goes small.
Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or Tyreke Evans. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Conductor of the We're Back Warrior Movement!
that makes no sense
how is Turiaf a 3 if we are playing small? how is Wright at 3 playing small? maybe i am missing something at 1:30 in the morning i should sleep.
by Rob Kurz blocks Yao Ming on Jun 4, 2009 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes you are
What it means is that; Buike, Jacks, and mostly C-Mag will be playing at the 4 spot. Not the opposite way around.
Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or Tyreke Evans. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Conductor of the We're Back Warrior Movement!
ok
yeah thats what i thought he meant but i still dont see how it works that way the way he typed it….
reading what he typed it says Randolph, Wright, etc. are 4’s normally but if the team is playing small then they are a 3….that makes no sense
by Rob Kurz blocks Yao Ming on Jun 4, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions
dont see how it works that way the way he typed it….
his quote
“Our 4’s: Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf, (All 3’s if we play small)”basically he’s saying “Our 4’s include:” AR, RK, JD, BW, RT (and any 3’s (like Maggette) who play the 4 position when we go small).
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
oooh
haha yeah that makes much more sense. dont know why i was interpreting it wrong. dont do drugs kids.
by Rob Kurz blocks Yao Ming on Jun 5, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions
i dont agree with the warriors alt decisions
the rookies i can see but if we get derozan or jennings we wouldnt dangle ellis especially if it was derozan. but i see us dangling beans if we can get derozan
dangle is so hot right now

Maybe its just because I’ve been procrastinating studying for finals by surfing sports sites all day long lately and MLB trade season is just getting going and the NBA draft is looming, but it seems like “dangle” is the new most popular word in the sports world right now. I’m confused though……by Beans you do mean Biedrins right? Why would we dangle our starting center if we draft a SG like DeRozan?
Thing A
That was unnecessary....
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 4, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions
No way
I can see yet another basketball player is gonna being just like either NBA player of similar race and build or NBA player from the same school as yet another basketball player.
Thing A

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 4, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions
uhh
you list morrow as a point gaurd. no. you also say we have no true shooting gaurd. morrow is as true as it gets. he may not be the one that you personally would choose, but shooting gaurd is definately his position. and if he works on his d he will be tight.
Blazers reportedly wants to trade up into lottery to get Stephen Curry
This can be good for the Warriors in couple ways:
1. We swap picks, our 7th for their 24th and one of their many young talents (Bayless, Sergio Rodriquez, Travis Outlaw) I personally like Bayless and think he can develop into a solid PG, and also like his athleticism.
2. Since this year’s draft is not very deep, I think we have a shot at these following players at pick #24: Terrence Williams, Eric Maynor, Jeff Teague, Patty Mills. This year’s draft is loaded with PGs, so we’re capable of drafting a decent PG at 24.
I forgot to mention
I REALLY like tyler hansbrough at #24 also. I think many people underestimate him.
NO to hansbrough
williams or collison at 24 would be possible tho
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
I read Hansborough is shooting up draft boards and might not last that long anymore. He was more athletic at the combine than expected. By the way, I think the NBA might go through the same evolution as the NFL – where all of a sudden everyone puts way too much stock into combine numbers to determine athleticism and make bad picks, until eventually everyone sees the negative effects and realizes – hey, the combine numbers don’t always accurately reflect a players athleticism…
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 6:34 AM PDT up reply actions
The NFL draft is like that nowadays because teams are trying to avoid players who produced in “gimmicky” spread offenses. I can’t think of anything similar to that in college basketball.
"We Deserve"
Well, I actually think the NFL has improved in this regard. I wasn’t trying to discount the combine as much as highlight that for a while it was basically thought, “hey player x ran a .1 or .2 faster 40 than player Y, so he must be a better athlete.” Then they got into games and found out that speed didn’t translate/show up in games. Now it seems NFL evaluators develop a range they think guys should run in after evaluating their film, and if the guy exceeds or falls short of that range they go back and look at the film again with this new knowledge to see if maybe they had wrongly evaluated him.
Just reading stuff on the NBA draft it seems there’s a little bit of that developing – where player X put up better combine numbers so he must be a better athlete than player Y. Amare Stoudemire put up a solid but hardly amazing ~35" vert at the combine. He’s clearly one of the elite athletes in the NBA. To quote Chad Ford discussing Blake Griffin, “His sprint score was in the middle of the pack and put him in the same league as Nick Collison and Mike Sweetney and just hundreds of a second off Stoudemire.” Clearly those names aren’t comparable athletically. I’ve now heard Hansborough performed better than expected at the combine and so his stock is rising a lot – well, that’s great, but he played the top competition enough times and just didn’t look that athletic that his combine numbers probably aren’t going to translate all that well to the NBA (in terms of his athleticism). As the quote shows, Nick Collison and Amare Stoudemire put up similar numbers in that drill, but calling them similar athletes would be…just flat out wrong.
My real point is I don’t think the combine numbers are really all that telling. I would say height, length and weight are, because it’s so hard to get an accurate estimate of those beforehand, but the drill numbers…eh, watch tape/workouts of the guy, see how he looks. If the numbers match up somewhat with what you were expecting, you probably have his athleticism judged right. If they don’t, you may not have him judged right, but it just may be the numbers aren’t a very good indicator.
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
D’antonio said that the most impressive thing about Stoudemire was his balance. He gets off ‘off balance’ shots in the lane because for him, they’re not ’off balance. Similarly, one of the impressive things about Rodman was not that he could jump straight up, but that he seemed to be able to leap up and sideways, throwing himself at a rebound and still landing on his feet.
Better athletes seem to be able to stay upright and guys who appear ‘less athletic’ seem to stumble more. I wonder if that’s a better differentiator than the agility drills or leaping contest. Not sure how you’d test it. Spin them around in a desk chair and then make them take a sobriety test?
by jae on Jun 5, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Better athletes seem to be able to stay upright and guys who appear ‘less athletic’ seem to stumble more.
There’s inherent athleticism and knowing how athletic you are and being able to trust yourself to make something happen. Some guys have it and are afraid to use it, some guys don’t have it and think they have it, and some guys just don’t have it and know it…
"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 5, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions
What about the guys who borrowed it with a sub-prime loan and weren’t able to pay it off when the adjustable rate changed?
by jae on Jun 5, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions
dancers will tell you it has to do with the core muscles, so however you test for that might work.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions
"gimmicky" spread offenses. I can’t think of anything similar to that in college basketball.
maybe teams that run a full court press? probably inflates their steal #’s and they get more wide open lay ups.
i’ve heard players that play in the NC Secondary & Shuffle offense are difficult to translate to the pro game.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm sick of
people sayin Monta is our PG…dude’s not a pg. plain and simple. I don’t want him to try to be a point guard. Marco was playing decent D and makin good, smart passes and hitting open shots when he had them before he got injured. Monta should stay at sg.
Why?
Why do you guys get so worked up on titles?
Call monta what you want, if he scores a bunch you call him a SG if he assist a bunch let’s call him a PG. Just put 5 guys on the court that work well together. a full court press in the nba is a joke so whoever brings the ball up the court is a “PG” are you kidding me? in a half court set they guy that dribbles is the pg, right? the guy that runs a pick and roll, i.e. jackson, he’s a PG now right? I’m completely over the monta debate. It’s boring and old.
IMO a real PG’s value is in the fast break, but that is about it. So call Marco the PG if it makes you feel good. He can run the break.
you're right
We get most of our halfcourt offense off isolations anyway, NBA position titles be damned.
What I care about most is having one guy on the court who can GUARD a PG, and one guy who can GUARD a SG. Is that too much to ask for?
"We Deserve"
You’re forgetting the part where the PG is quick enough to get dribble penetration in a half court set, and unlike the quick guy who likes to shoot it, uses those opportunities to get his teammates involved…
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions
IMO a real PG’s value is in the fast break, but that is about it.
this is probably only true in pick up games. in organized basketball, a PG’s “value” is in running the offense. it’s kind of why guys like Chauncey are so instrumental even though AI has just as high assist totals and why coaches value guys like Alston, Anthony Carter, Duhon, Blake, etc.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions
It depends heavily on how you initiate the break. If a break is the result of a turnover or some opportune outlet with a guy cheating, it’s not as important. Those are essentially the easy money points that involve the players present when the opportunity presents itself and those opportunities aren’t by any necessity started by a point guard.
If it’s a designed secondary break offense where the goal is to push the ball up quickly, usually by an outlet pass from a rebound (or sometimes from inbound play), a point guard helps immensely. The ideal case is where a rebound gets pushed to the breaking to either spot a guy cutting or a guy with a free look and take advantage of a numbers mismatch. But if that doesn’t occur, a good point guard is a huge asset in keeping the ball going and find the mismatches before their opponents can pick up their man without a stall on the secondary break. If that isn’t an option, knowing when to hold and reset. Ideally, most of your players recognize these differences and if that’s the case, your offense runs effectively, but a point guard with better vision makes it easier to spot him on the initial outlet and make the proper decision of where to launch the attack.
Even “up-tempo” teams get into half court sets more than half the time though. And having a point guard to direct traffic in these situations is very beneficial.
i used to think the same way
but thats the reason why small ball doesn’t work in the long term. i thought theoretically, if you have 5 players who are skilled in every way, doesn’t that make them more dangerous? why not get 5 elite PGs or SGs who can do everything on the floor. the reality is that there is a reason why the roles of C/PF/SF/SG/PG were created. it is a perfect balance and each position has skills that are necessary in the half court and full court.
a team with CP3, deron, kobe, lebron, wade would probably lose more often than not to a team with say….billups, brandon roy, danny granger, david lee, bynum in my opinion.
now that i think of it, this has nothing to do with your argument since you call for no pg. how about wade, carmelo, ben gordon, kevin martin, vince carter vs. billups, roy, granger, lee, bynum. i’d take the traditional lineup
by gogoldenbears on Jun 5, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions
For the record
I put Monta at PG, because Nelson is adamant at trying to make him one. I’m one of those folk who does not see any or little potential of Monta at the 1.
Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, or Tyreke Evans. A Warrior in 09.
With the 6th Pick in the 2009 MLB Draft, the SF Giants pick Donovan Tate.
Conductor of the We're Back Warrior Movement!
I don’t think it’s at all clear that Nelson is adamant about trying to make him one. He’s said that it’s the position Monta has to play if he’s going to succeed. He hasn’t said that he sees him succeeding. His statements (if you believe anything Nellie says) could as easily be taken to be “well, crap, since he’s here, what else am I going to do with him?” as much as “I’m going to turn him into my point guard”.
by jae on Jun 4, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Dude..............
today i had a dream we drafted Earl Clark and i was like hell naw how come u didn’t take Jennings.
Your a Jerk.
Your a Jerk.
Your a Jerk.
I know.
your a jerk
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
I have a WEIRD feeling we're gonna draft a 3 and keep Monta at the 1...
Jrue Holiday or Johnny Flynn PLEASE!no Jennings!No Baron!
We Believe
by RunNdGun on Jun 4, 2009 5:28 PM PDT reply actions
Even if we draft a PG Monta is still our PG.
No rookie is coming in and starting, that’s dillusional. Especially with Nellie as a coach and especially when we’re talking about Jamal Crawford as our backup PG, what rookie is cracking this starting lineup?
Monta
Jack
Buike
AR or BW
AB
That’s right no rookie in the draft would start for our team next year, not even the highly touted Blake Griffin. From this years standpoint, and really from the standpoint of the next 2-4 years, the draft is irrelevant. We have a young core of players that are all under 25. Monta, Belli, AR, BW, AB, Buike, Turiaf and Morrow. That’s why us talking draft is silly, we’re basically debating on who the “Gatorade protector” will be…
by myk on Jun 4, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions
that core isn’t good enough to not worry about the draft. the team we have is not even close to competing for a title without some major changes. the fact that we’re young doesn’t mean that we’re going to take the league by storm in a couple years. we need to keep adding good pieces and hope to improve this team dramatically. if we get enough good pieces maybe we could trade them for the type of player that helps us get over the hump and become a contender, but don’t talk about our young core like they are the envy of the league, in 3 years, that team looks like a low level playoff team.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
Care to elaborate?
Is it his shooting? His ball handling? His passing? His height? What actually makes Flynn a better prospect?
by jae on Jun 4, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions
he is better because “he is a winner”, just like Lebron
by randolphforpresident on Jun 4, 2009 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions

"No no Nene!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5DxNl4EB0
R Dizzle = Wannabe AB1
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 5, 2009 7:24 AM PDT up reply actions
i think people like him cuz of his athletisism
either way i dont like flynn or lawson for us.
if we get a pg….it should be (in this order): rubio, holiday, jennings, curry/evans…and could even trade down to get collison if we want a possible good backup pg
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
I still don’t get the Jennings love. I’m very unclear as to how someone could prefer him over Curry, Lawson, Flynn or Evans.
Thing A
i can see preferring him to evans, who i am firmly against drafting now. he’s got size and rebounds fairly well, but he’s basically a shooting guard who wants to be a point guard and can’t shoot. it’s weird, i just have no idea what i’m getting outside of someone who is big for his position and supposedly a good athlete. i don’t like it.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
yea Evans was the last one on that list for me, I wouldn’t want him over any of the other 3.
Thing A
is jonny flynn the 5th best player in this draft (behind griffin, rubio, harden, and i’ll say it, stephen curry)? i’m nervous about thabeet being a taller sam dalembert, which is hardly a disaster, but i can’t see him being much better than that, and i can see him being considerably worse. i guess i’d throw lawson into the 5th best player discussion, though nothing about him excites me and for some unknown reason i just really like flynn as an nba point guard.
the rest have pretty large question marks that would concern me greatly. i just don’t see the hype with holiday, though i don’t hate him either. derozan looks to be a great athlete still figuring out how to play basketball, same with evans and it’s pretty rare to see guys like that work out. my thoughts on jennings are well documented. i just don’t know what to make of this section of the draft.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
If I had to put it into tiers it would be something like- 1. Griffin 2. Rubio 3.Harden/Thabeet/Hill 4.Curry/Flynn/DeRozan/Lawson
5.Holiday/Evans/Williams/Clark
I’m not all that down on Thabeet. DeRozan and Flynn are growing on me and all along I’ve thought Lawson and Curry’s standout college careers have actually kinda worked against them (unfairly giving them the label of great college player who can’t make it at the next level), I was hoping Evans would excite me a little more than he has and Holiday has separated himself from Jennings but still has a ways to go before I’d love him at 7. I’d be ok with just about any of those guys, Jennings is the only guy I’m really against at this point. If it were up to me I think I’d probably go Curry or Flynn assuming the guys in those top 3 tiers are off the board.
Thing A
forgot about hill, i’d slot him after harden in that same tier and would put jennings in group 5 instead of group nowhere, but generally the tiers you have set up work well for me too (our fundamental differences on thabeet aside).
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
actually, changed my mind about my tiers due to my crazy love of james harden:
1. griffin/rubio
2. harden
3. hill/flynn/curry
3a. (unsure whether to go 3 or 4 for these guys) lawson/derozan
4. holiday/williams/thabeet
5. jennings/clark
6. evans/probably other guys i haven’t thought about
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
I’m really curious what it is that people are seeing in Flynn to rate him above Lawson.
So far I’ve got a nebulous “athleticism”. Flynn jumped higher. He was faster in one of the two drills, but not as fast in the other. He wasn’t as strong as Lawson. They are almost exactly the same height. In terms of actual performance on the court, Lawson shot the ball much better from everywhere, got to the line a bit more, was a bit better at getting steals, at dishing out assists, and was significantly better at avoiding turnovers.
to me, they look to be very similar in terms of how good they’ll be in the pros, it’s sort of a coin flip. for some reason, scouts (who spend a lot more time and effort on this than i do) seem to think flynn’s the better player. i don’t really know, so i stuck lawson in tier 3a. it was really more of a hat tip to the guy’s who do this for a living than a definite declaration that lawson is not as good as flynn.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
for some reason, scouts (who spend a lot more time and effort on this than i do) seem to think flynn’s the better player.
it’s an interesting question b/c, as jae posted, the stats alone clearly show Lawson edges Flynn out.
(after looking around)
on draftexpress under TL’s weaknesses it says “college system makes him difficult to evaluate”. so maybe that’s it?
or maybe they feel Flynn’s superior hops & slightly larger wingspan will better help him overcome his height definciencies? (like help him finish at the pro level)
his personality? it seems ppl have been raving about his vocal leadership in the camps.
i also read that Lawson’s jumper is more of a set shot and that there are questions about him getting said shot off in the pros.
or maybe it’s just b/c Flynn is a year younger?
whatever it is, scouts seem to feel Flynn’s game translates more so to the pro game than Lawson’s despite Ty’s superior stats.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
flynn has longer arms?
LeBron James? I'm the only Ty Crane.
by misterjennings on Jun 5, 2009 5:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Leadership! Intangibles! Winninger attitudeness!
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 6:40 AM PDT up reply actions
What’s up with the Evans hate?
I have no problem with a 6’5" PG (the position he’s played his whole life) who rebounds and defends like a forward and attacks the basket.
"We Deserve"
Evans was a freshman. Antonio Anderson was a senior. Similar situation in UCLA with Collison and Holiday.
"We Deserve"
and
thus in both cases, saying the young guy played PG his whole life/career would be false.
Thing A
what I meant was PG is his “natural position”. He only played SG for a little in college because of seniority
"We Deserve"
antonio anderson
is nowhere close to the talent that darren collison is and didn’t have close to the track record. you would think that if evans, being a top recruit and having that much of a talent disparity would get the role of his choice unlike holiday.
evans is listed as a SG in most draft material. also just because he had the ball in his hand in high school doesn’t mean he was a PG. he probably just iso’ed on every play…
by gogoldenbears on Jun 5, 2009 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I went to UCLA and, let me tell you, Darren Collison has somehow tricked you into thinking he’s more talented than he actually is. There’s a good reason why he stayed all 4 years.
"We Deserve"
perhaps
i mean i don’t think collison is amazing. i meant it as more of a commentary on how average of a player antonio anderson is. i still think collison is much much better than anderson.
btw as a UCLA guy, what are your thoughts on holiday?
by gogoldenbears on Jun 5, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Evans wasn’t recruited as a 1. He wasn’t playing there initially because they thought 2 would be his best position. Then Cal was having issues at the 1 so he moved Evans there to see what would happened, it worked, and he stuck with it.
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
People are seeing shades of Jamal Crawford because of things like:
“Is still prone to tunnel vision, where he seems to forget about his teammates”
“Needs to learn to pick his spots better, rather than attacking into traffic and getting into trouble”
“The 3.6 TOs per game are a result of both the system he was in, and his out of control play”
“Defensively, he is a bit lackadaisical”
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions
He averaged 2 steals and nearly a block per game. I know those stats don’t entirely indicate how good defensively he is. But still.. a 6’5" PG with those stats is hardly “lackadaisical” in my opinion.
"We Deserve"
Steals, while valuable, are a pretty bad way to determine a player’s defensive ability….especially when its 2 spg in conf. USA
Thing A
Steals are a bad way to determine a player’s defensive ability, but they do say something about his activity on the defensive end.
Those stats do differentiate him from Jamal Crawford and his lackadaisical defense.
"We Deserve"
Crawford averaged well over a steal per game at Michigan. I don’t know if he gets to 2 steals per game if he had played in conf. USA, but I think his steal total would increase significantly and his turnover total would come down a bit if he’d been playing basketball powerhouses like East Carolina, UTEP, Marshall, Tulane, Rice, and SMU.
Thing A
with that sort of height advantage over college pgs, it’d be a huge embarassment if he didn’t average about a block a game.
the real issue here is the other points: that the guy is a slasher who doesn’t really involve his teammates well, but for some reason was initiating the offense. when you factor in what a bad shooter he was, the 7 pick is way too high for him.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
considering his 3.9 assists vs 3.6 TO’s per game in college, i don’t think he’s going to be very successful as a PG at the NBA level.
i like Evans, but not for the W’s. from draftexpress:
The problem is that he’s an incredibly ball-dominant point guard, often looking like a fish out of water when he’s forced to give up the rock for more than a few seconds. Memphis’ offense often looks quite stagnant, with Evans over-dribbling the ball at the top of the key as his four teammates stand around and twiddle their thumbs. He can be pretty sloppy with the ball at times, displaying questionable decision-making skills and incredibly poor shot-selection, which wouldn’t be as much of an issue if he was able to make shots at a respectable rate from the perimeter.just sounds too much like Jack & company.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions
Dwyane Wade had a similar A:TO ratio during his freshman year in college too. I’d take Wade’s passing skills as a PG on my team anyday.
"We Deserve"
Wade’s a SG at the NBA level. see Jason Williams / Gary Payton / Mario Chalmers.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Wade’s passing skills are greatly helped by the fact that he’s one of the top 5 offensive players in the league….if Evans can force teams to double and triple team him consistently I think he could throw up some good assist numbers (though still turn the ball over a lot) like Wade. But does anyone think he’s that goode?
Thing A
I don’t think anyone thinks he’s that good.
But, for simplicity’s sake, I’d rather gamble on Evans and hope for Wade than draft DeRozan and hope for JRich.
"We Deserve"
even if “j-rich” was infinitely more likely for derozan to reach than “wade” for evans?
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
i personally think derozan is more likely to turn into vince carter than evans is likely to turn into dwayne wade…
and nobody is advocating derozan. how about one of the other players…
by gogoldenbears on Jun 5, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
how so?
I wasn’t following Wade back in Marquette during the year 2000, but Evans’ physical build, tendencies, combine measurables, projected draft slot, and freshman year stats aren’t very far off from Wade’s.
Check it out:
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Dwyane-Wade-4726/stats/
"We Deserve"
wade’s freshman year stats were much better than evans’. evan’s has a slight edge in assists and pretty much nothing else and wade destroys him in shooting percentages, rebounding, steals and blocks (a half a steal and a half a block per 30 minutes is a big margin). there’s really no question about who was better as a freshman.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
+1
wade was such a beast at Marq…
LeBron James? I'm the only Ty Crane.
by misterjennings on Jun 5, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m mostly talking about tendencies and physical tools and abilities. I don’t remember Kobe coming into the NBA with poor handles, poor defensive effort, and the tendency to settle for midrange jumpers.
"We Deserve"
Things like “questionable decision-making” and “poor shot-selection” don’t exactly surprise me about a college freshman thrown into the SG position for the first time in his life. Age and experience could very well improve these things.
"We Deserve"
yeah, i’m more concerned with the ball-pounding & over-dribbling part.
though (based on his highlights) he is pretty great at dribbling.
by the evil monkey on Jun 5, 2009 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions
At this point I think we’ve discussed the Jennings issue enough. I think we should wait until teams can actually see him in a workout and see what people are saying before we pick it back up…
by Missing Barry on Jun 5, 2009 6:41 AM PDT up reply actions
NBA Mock Draft 2009
Update: Seventh
Last updated: Friday; June 5, 2009
1.) Los Angeles Clippers — Blake Griffin, PF/Oklahoma
2.) Memphis Grizzlies — Hasheem Thabeet, C/Connecticut
3.) Oklahoma City Thunder — James Harden, SG/Arizona State
4.) Sacramento Kings — Ricky Rubio, PG/Spain
5.) Washington Wizards — Jordan Hill, PF/Arizona
6.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DeMar DeRozan, SG/USC
7.) Golden State Warriors — Stephen Curry, PG/Davidson
8.) New York Knicks — Brandon Jennings, PG/United States of America
9.) Toronto Raptors — Earl Clark, SF/Louisville
10.) Milwaukee Bucks — DeJuan Blair, PF/Pittsburgh
11.) New Jersey Nets — Jrue Holiday, PG/UCLA
12.) Charlotte Bobcats — James Johnson, SF/Georgia Tech
13.) Indiana Pacers — Gerald Henderson, SG/Duke
14.) Phoenix Suns — Tyreke Evans, PG/Memphis
15.) Detroit Pistons — Wayne Ellington, SG/North Carolina
16.) Chicago Bulls — Chase Budinger, SG/Arizona
17.) Philadelphia 76ers — Ty Lawson, PG/North Carolina
18.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Eric Maynor, PG/VCU
19.) Atlanta Hawks — B.J. Mullens, C/Ohio State
20.) Utah Jazz — Jonny Flynn, PG/Syracuse
21.) New Orleans Hornets — Terrence Williams, SG/Louisville
22.) Dallas Mavericks — Jeff Teague, PG/Wake Forest
23.) Sacramento Kings — Omri Casspi, SF/Israel
24.) Portland Trailblazers — Gani Lawal, PF/Georgia Tech
25.) Oklahoma City Thunder — Tyler Hansbrough, PF/North Carolina
26.) Chicago Bulls — Derrick Brown, SF/Xavier
27.) Memphis Grizzlies — DaJuan Summers, SF/Georgetown
28.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Taj Gibson, PF/USC
29.) Los Angeles Lakers — Patrick Mills, PG/St. Mary’s
30.) Cleveland Cavaliers — Sam Young, SF/Pittsburgh
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 5, 2009 1:03 PM PDT reply actions
Well, as the title says, it’s my mock draft.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 5, 2009 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions
So why would the W's pick Curry?
He and Monta cannot be paired together. Our backcourt would be tiny and frail. Do the Warriors trade Monta in this scenario?
He and Monta cannot be paired together.
this is getting blown way out of proportion. i’m not saying pick Curry or Flynn or Lawson, but if you were faced with drafting tj ford or gerald green, who do you take?
just b/c you have a young player at that spot shouldn’t preclude you from taking another young player at that same spot. isn’t that how we got Anthony Randolph?
let’s not let having a Tayshaun Prince stop us from taking a Carmelo Anthony (or vice versa). it’s a lot better problem to have than ending up with a Darko Milicic.
by the evil monkey on Jun 7, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
that’s a false choice. the alternatives to drafting Curry aren’t players that you know or think will fail. it’s not like Curry’s clearly better than the players that will also be available to draft at that spot.
and thats a false assumption
How do you know that Curry isn’t clearly better than the players that will be available at that spot? Most reports indicate he had a very impressive showing at the combine workouts. Just because most draft sites have guys 3-12 pretty closely ranked it certainly doesn’t mean the Warriors front office, or any front office, will have them similarly ranked.
Thing A
It’s true that I don’t know that the Warriors or other teams won’t have him ranked much higher than the others. If they do believe he’s an entire “tier” higher than others who are available then I will agree with those that say you should get the better player, regardless of need.
Going by what major media outlets are projecting (ESPN, HoopsHype) and how they’re evaluating the players, though, you can see some trends. The most pertinent is that Curry isn’t being projected as a player who will be better than some of the other names that people have been throwing around for the Warriors, like Holiday and Evans. Even if people do think he’ll be better, it doesn’t seem like he’s being described as a tier above. This is obviously a matter of opinion.
I suppose it all comes down to whether or not you (or the Warriors management) believe that Curry is in a tier above the other options. If they think he is then they ought to pick him. If they think he’s comparable or worse than players who would fit a greater need, I think they should pass on him.
he’s a tier up from holiday, who didn’t really produce at the college level. i understand that he was playing out of position, but the risk that holiday’s high school game is indicative of how good he’ll be at the nba level, despite a subpar showing at ucla, is a risk i’d rather not take. is his ceiling even any higher than curry’s? i just don’t see what the hype is about.
and curry is at least two tiers up from evans, who should not sniff the top 10. he’s a couple years away, and i’m really not sure what he does well outside of rebound fairly well for his position and get to the basket. he can’t shoot, wasn’t a great distributor, was only a decent defender, and the main reason i hear his name brought up so often on this board is that he’s tall and could be paired with monta easily. i’d rather have the challenge of fitting a good player in our backcourt than the simple task of fitting evans in on the end of the bench.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
I suspect there’s a big difference between the way the media and NBA front offices evaluate draft talent. If there weren’t, all of us would be full blown experts with boxscore analyzing, combine measurement comparing, and Youtube-highlight watching.
In reality, by the time the draft comes around, our front office is going to know exactly who projects better. Their JOB dictates that they separate Curry, Holiday, Evans, Jennings, etc into their own ranked separate tiers; or else they’re not doing their job very well. If all they’re doing is trying to find the best “fit” from a media-created tier, then our front office really sucks at evaluating talent.
"We Deserve"
NBA Draft Big Board 2009
Update: Second
Last updated: Friday; June 5, 2009
1.) Blake Griffin — PF, Oklahoma
2.) Ricky Rubio — PG, Spain
3.) James Harden — SG, Arizona State
4.) Jordan Hill — PF, Arizona
5.) Brandon Jennings — PG, United States of America
6.) Jrue Holiday — PG, UCLA
7.) DeMar DeRozan — SG, USC
8.) Hasheem Thabeet — C, Connecticut
9.) Tyreke Evans — PG, Memphis
10.) Earl Clark — SF, Louisville
11.) Stephen Curry — PG, Davidson
12.) Ty Lawson — PG, North Carolina
13.) Eric Maynor — PG, VCU
14.) James Johnson — SF, Georgia Tech
15.) Jonny Flynn — PG, Syracuse
16.) DeJuan Blair — PF, Pittsburgh
17.) Jeff Teague — PG, Wake Forest
18.) Terrence Williams — SG, Louisville
19.) Chase Budinger — SG, Arizona
20.) Gerald Henderson — SG, Duke
21.) B.J. Mullens — C, Ohio State
22.) Gani Lawal — PF, Georgia Tech
23.) Derrick Brown — SF, Xavier
24.) Wayne Ellington — SG, North Carolina
25.) DaJuan Summers — SF, Georgetown
26.) Tyler Hansbrough — PF, North Carolina
27.) Patrick Mills — PG, St. Mary’s
28.) Taj Gibson — PF, USC
29.) Sam Young — SF, Pittsburgh
30.) Omri Casspi — SF, Israel
NBA Mock Draft 2009
Update: Ninth
Last updated: Friday; June 5, 2009
1.) Los Angeles Clippers — Blake Griffin, PF/Oklahoma
2.) Memphis Grizzlies — Hasheem Thabeet, C/Connecticut
3.) Oklahoma City Thunder — James Harden, SG/Arizona State
4.) Sacramento Kings — Ricky Rubio, PG/Spain
5.) Washington Wizards — Jordan Hill, PF/Arizona
6.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DeMar DeRozan, SG/USC
7.) Golden State Warriors — Stephen Curry, PG/Davidson
8.) New York Knicks — Brandon Jennings, PG/United States of America
9.) Toronto Raptors — Earl Clark, SF/Louisville
10.) Milwaukee Bucks — DeJuan Blair, PF/Pittsburgh
11.) New Jersey Nets — Jrue Holiday, PG/UCLA
12.) Charlotte Bobcats — James Johnson, SF/Georgia Tech
13.) Indiana Pacers — Gerald Henderson, SG/Duke
14.) Phoenix Suns — Tyreke Evans, PG/Memphis
15.) Detroit Pistons — Terrence Williams, SG/Louisville
16.) Chicago Bulls — Chase Budinger, SG/Arizona
17.) Philadelphia 76ers — Ty Lawson, PG/North Carolina
18.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Eric Maynor, PG/VCU
19.) Atlanta Hawks — B.J. Mullens, C/Ohio State
20.) Utah Jazz — Jonny Flynn, PG/Syracuse
21.) New Orleans Hornets — Wayne Ellington, SG/North Carolina
22.) Dallas Mavericks — Jeff Teague, PG/Wake Forest
23.) Sacramento Kings — Derrick Brown, SF/Xavier
24.) Portland Trailblazers — Gani Lawal, PF/Georgia Tech
25.) Oklahoma City Thunder — Tyler Hansbrough, PF/North Carolina
26.) Chicago Bulls — Omri Casspi, SF/Israel
27.) Memphis Grizzlies — DaJuan Summers, SF/Georgetown
28.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Taj Gibson, PF/USC
29.) Los Angeles Lakers — Josh Heytvelt, PF/Gonzaga
30.) Cleveland Cavaliers — Sam Young, SF/Pittsburgh
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 5, 2009 8:19 PM PDT reply actions
ha, dude you don’t have to give us your mock draft update every 8 hours….. especially when there are no changes in the top 15
Thing A
I have nothing better to do.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 6, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Nelson is going to fall in love with the guy when watching him in person.
Well, anyway, that’s my theory and why I have him going to the Warriors.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 6, 2009 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I hope we
take Jennings
The Bay is the place to be!!
by Mashed Potatoes on Jun 7, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions
I’m still hoping for A damn good basketball player. He’s at the top of my big board for guys I hope will be available.
by jae on Jun 7, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Where
does the line for a damn good player stop?
by The Dedication on Jun 7, 2009 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions
A damn good player will be taken by someone in the draft. You should check out his stats. He’s clutch too.
i used to like a damn good basketball player, but now i think he reminds me of a decent (but underrated) basketball player who is similar in build and skin tone. i mean, would you draft a decent (but underrated) basketball player at the 7? i wouldn’t that’s way too high.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
NBA Draft Big Board 2009
Update: Third
Last updated: Sunday; June 7, 2009
1.) Blake Griffin — PF, Oklahoma
2.) Ricky Rubio — PG, Spain
3.) James Harden — SG, Arizona State
4.) Jordan Hill — PF, Arizona
5.) Brandon Jennings — PG, United States of America
6.) Jrue Holiday — PG, UCLA
7.) DeMar DeRozan — SG, USC
8.) Hasheem Thabeet — C, Connecticut
9.) Tyreke Evans — PG, Memphis
10.) Earl Clark — SF, Louisville
11.) Stephen Curry — PG, Davidson
12.) Ty Lawson — PG, North Carolina
13.) Eric Maynor — PG, VCU
14.) James Johnson — SF, Georgia Tech
15.) Jonny Flynn — PG, Syracuse
16.) DeJuan Blair — PF, Pittsburgh
17.) Jeff Teague — PG, Wake Forest
18.) Terrence Williams — SG, Louisville
19.) Chase Budinger — SG, Arizona
20.) Gerald Henderson — SG, Duke
21.) B.J. Mullens — C, Ohio State
22.) Gani Lawal — PF, Georgia Tech
23.) Derrick Brown — SF, Xavier
24.) Wayne Ellington — SG, North Carolina
25.) DaJuan Summers — SF, Georgetown
26.) Tyler Hansbrough — PF, North Carolina
27.) Patrick Mills — PG, St. Mary’s
28.) Taj Gibson — PF, USC
29.) Sam Young — SF, Pittsburgh
30.) Austin Daye — SF, Gonzaga
NBA Mock Draft 2009
Update: Tenth
Last updated: Sunday; June 7, 2009
1.) Los Angeles Clippers — Blake Griffin, PF/Oklahoma
2.) Memphis Grizzlies — Hasheem Thabeet, C/Connecticut
3.) Oklahoma City Thunder — James Harden, SG/Arizona State
4.) Sacramento Kings — Ricky Rubio, PG/Spain
5.) Washington Wizards — Jordan Hill, PF/Arizona
6.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DeMar DeRozan, SG/USC
7.) Golden State Warriors — Stephen Curry, PG/Davidson
8.) New York Knicks — Brandon Jennings, PG/United States of America
9.) Toronto Raptors — Earl Clark, SF/Louisville
10.) Milwaukee Bucks — DeJuan Blair, PF/Pittsburgh
11.) New Jersey Nets — Jrue Holiday, PG/UCLA
12.) Charlotte Bobcats — James Johnson, SF/Georgia Tech
13.) Indiana Pacers — Gerald Henderson, SG/Duke
14.) Phoenix Suns — Tyreke Evans, PG/Memphis
15.) Detroit Pistons — Terrence Williams, SG/Louisville
16.) Chicago Bulls — Chase Budinger, SG/Arizona
17.) Philadelphia 76ers — Ty Lawson, PG/North Carolina
18.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Eric Maynor, PG/VCU
19.) Atlanta Hawks — B.J. Mullens, C/Ohio State
20.) Utah Jazz — Jonny Flynn, PG/Syracuse
21.) New Orleans Hornets — Wayne Ellington, SG/North Carolina
22.) Dallas Mavericks — Jeff Teague, PG/Wake Forest
23.) Sacramento Kings — Derrick Brown, SF/Xavier
24.) Portland Trailblazers — Gani Lawal, PF/Georgia Tech
25.) Oklahoma City Thunder — Tyler Hansbrough, PF/North Carolina
26.) Chicago Bulls — Austin Daye, SF/Gonzaga
27.) Memphis Grizzlies — DaJuan Summers, SF/Georgetown
28.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Taj Gibson, PF/USC
29.) Los Angeles Lakers — Josh Heytvelt, PF/Gonzaga
30.) Cleveland Cavaliers — Sam Young, SF/Pittsburgh
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 7, 2009 11:10 PM PDT reply actions
NBA Draft Big Board 2009
Update: Fourth
Last updated: Monday; June 8, 2009
1.) Blake Griffin — PF, Oklahoma
2.) Ricky Rubio — PG, Spain
3.) James Harden — SG, Arizona State
4.) Jordan Hill — PF, Arizona
5.) Brandon Jennings — PG, United States of America
6.) Jrue Holiday — PG, UCLA
7.) DeMar DeRozan — SG, USC
8.) Hasheem Thabeet — C, Connecticut
9.) Tyreke Evans — PG, Memphis
10.) Earl Clark — SF, Louisville
11.) Stephen Curry — PG, Davidson
12.) Ty Lawson — PG, North Carolina
13.) James Johnson — SF, Georgia Tech
14.) Eric Maynor — PG, VCU
15.) Jonny Flynn — PG, Syracuse
16.) DeJuan Blair — PF, Pittsburgh
17.) Terrence Williams — SG, Louisville
18.) Jeff Teague — PG, Wake Forest
19.) Chase Budinger — SG, Arizona
20.) Gerald Henderson — SG, Duke
21.) B.J. Mullens — C, Ohio State
22.) Gani Lawal — PF, Georgia Tech
23.) Derrick Brown — SF, Xavier
24.) Wayne Ellington — SG, North Carolina
25.) DaJuan Summers — SF, Georgetown
26.) Tyler Hansbrough — PF, North Carolina
27.) Patrick Mills — PG, St. Mary’s
28.) Taj Gibson — PF, USC
29.) Sam Young — SF, Pittsburgh
30.) Austin Daye — SF, Gonzaga
NBA Mock Draft 2009
Update: Eleventh
Last updated: Monday; June 8, 2009
1.) Los Angeles Clippers — Blake Griffin, PF/Oklahoma
2.) Memphis Grizzlies — Hasheem Thabeet, C/Connecticut
3.) Oklahoma City Thunder — James Harden, SG/Arizona State
4.) Sacramento Kings — Ricky Rubio, PG/Spain
5.) Washington Wizards — Jordan Hill, PF/Arizona
6.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DeMar DeRozan, SG/USC
7.) Golden State Warriors — Stephen Curry, PG/Davidson
8.) New York Knicks — Brandon Jennings, PG/United States of America
9.) Toronto Raptors — Earl Clark, SF/Louisville
10.) Milwaukee Bucks — DeJuan Blair, PF/Pittsburgh
11.) New Jersey Nets — James Johnson, SF/Georgia Tech
12.) Charlotte Bobcats — Tyreke Evans, PG/Memphis
13.) Indiana Pacers — Chase Budinger, SG/Arizona
14.) Phoenix Suns — Jrue Holiday, PG/UCLA
15.) Detroit Pistons — Terrence Williams, SG/Louisville
16.) Chicago Bulls — Gerald Henderson, SG/Duke
17.) Philadelphia 76ers — Ty Lawson, PG/North Carolina
18.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Eric Maynor, PG/VCU
19.) Atlanta Hawks — B.J. Mullens, C/Ohio State
20.) Utah Jazz — Jonny Flynn, PG/Syracuse
21.) New Orleans Hornets — Wayne Ellington, SG/North Carolina
22.) Dallas Mavericks — Jeff Teague, PG/Wake Forest
23.) Sacramento Kings — Derrick Brown, SF/Xavier
24.) Portland Trailblazers — Gani Lawal, PF/Georgia Tech
25.) Oklahoma City Thunder — Tyler Hansbrough, PF/North Carolina
26.) Chicago Bulls — Austin Daye, SF/Gonzaga
27.) Memphis Grizzlies — DaJuan Summers, SF/Georgetown
28.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Taj Gibson, PF/USC
29.) Los Angeles Lakers — Josh Heytvelt, PF/Gonzaga
30.) Cleveland Cavaliers — Sam Young, SF/Pittsburgh
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 8, 2009 12:51 PM PDT reply actions
NBA Draft Big Board 2009
Update: Fifth
Last updated: Monday; June 8, 2009
1.) Blake Griffin — PF, Oklahoma
2.) Ricky Rubio — PG, Spain
3.) James Harden — SG, Arizona State
4.) Jordan Hill — PF, Arizona
5.) Brandon Jennings — PG, United States of America
6.) Jrue Holiday — PG, UCLA
7.) DeMar DeRozan — SG, USC
8.) Hasheem Thabeet — C, Connecticut
9.) Tyreke Evans — PG, Memphis
10.) Earl Clark — SF, Louisville
11.) Stephen Curry — PG, Davidson
12.) Ty Lawson — PG, North Carolina
13.) James Johnson — SF, Georgia Tech
14.) Eric Maynor — PG, VCU
15.) Jonny Flynn — PG, Syracuse
16.) DeJuan Blair — PF, Pittsburgh
17.) Terrence Williams — SG, Louisville
18.) Jeff Teague — PG, Wake Forest
19.) Chase Budinger — SG, Arizona
20.) Austin Daye — SF, Gonzaga
21.) Gerald Henderson — SG, Duke
22.) B.J. Mullens — C, Ohio State
23.) Gani Lawal — PF, Georgia Tech
24.) Derrick Brown — SF, Xavier
25.) Wayne Ellington — SG, North Carolina
26.) DaJuan Summers — SF, Georgetown
27.) Tyler Hansbrough — PF, North Carolina
28.) Patrick Mills — PG, St. Mary’s
29.) Taj Gibson — PF, USC
30.) Sam Young — SF, Pittsburgh
NBA Mock Draft 2009
Update: Twelfth
Last updated: Monday; June 8, 2009
1.) Los Angeles Clippers — Blake Griffin, PF/Oklahoma
2.) Memphis Grizzlies — Hasheem Thabeet, C/Connecticut
3.) Oklahoma City Thunder — James Harden, SG/Arizona State
4.) Sacramento Kings — Ricky Rubio, PG/Spain
5.) Washington Wizards — Jordan Hill, PF/Arizona
6.) Minnesota Timberwolves — DeMar DeRozan, SG/USC
7.) Golden State Warriors — Stephen Curry, PG/Davidson
8.) New York Knicks — Brandon Jennings, PG/United States of America
9.) Toronto Raptors — Earl Clark, SF/Louisville
10.) Milwaukee Bucks — DeJuan Blair, PF/Pittsburgh
11.) New Jersey Nets — James Johnson, SF/Georgia Tech
12.) Charlotte Bobcats — Tyreke Evans, PG/Memphis
13.) Indiana Pacers — Chase Budinger, SG/Arizona
14.) Phoenix Suns — Jrue Holiday, PG/UCLA
15.) Detroit Pistons — Terrence Williams, SG/Louisville
16.) Chicago Bulls — Gerald Henderson, SG/Duke
17.) Philadelphia 76ers — Ty Lawson, PG/North Carolina
18.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Eric Maynor, PG/VCU
19.) Atlanta Hawks — B.J. Mullens, C/Ohio State
20.) Utah Jazz — Jonny Flynn, PG/Syracuse
21.) New Orleans Hornets — Austin Daye, SF/Gonzaga
22.) Dallas Mavericks — Jeff Teague, PG/Wake Forest
23.) Sacramento Kings — Wayne Ellington, SG/North Carolina
24.) Portland Trailblazers — Gani Lawal, PF/Georgia Tech
25.) Oklahoma City Thunder — Tyler Hansbrough, PF/North Carolina
26.) Chicago Bulls — Derrick Brown, SF/Xavier
27.) Memphis Grizzlies — DaJuan Summers, SF/Georgetown
28.) Minnesota Timberwolves — Taj Gibson, PF/USC
29.) Los Angeles Lakers — Josh Heytvelt, PF/Gonzaga
30.) Cleveland Cavaliers — Sam Young, SF/Pittsburgh
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 8, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions
seriously, this is just cluttering the board at this point. an “updated” mock draft and big board every few hours with no explanation of what’s changed or why it changed or why we should care is overkill. maybe try making a fanpost with your mock and big board, include explanations and update it every few days, explaining why the changes (if any) happened. right now, you’re just throwing a 60 item list at us at very brief intervals. stop.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by 





















































