Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Missouri Survives Scare, Louisville And Marquette Roll

Possible Trade Idea

What do you guys think about trading Belinelli, Maggette, and Wright for Baron and DeAndre Jordan? I was always happy with getting Turiaf but I think he should be our starting four. Not because he's not good at the five but because Beans needs help defensively. I've been noticing teams are becoming really eager to slash in the lane whenever we put Turiaf back on the bench for Beans, and I've REALLY been noticing that Andris can't do much about it. I think Ronny's defensive prowess and Biedrins' rebounding gives us quite the interior presence. Jordan is an athletically gifted big man who we could work on developing for the future, and is physically more of a "true" five than both Biedrins and Turiaf. Bringing Baron back doesn't really need to be explained, it's an obvious factor for us.

* Also, I just wanted to add that maybe we should consider drafting Terrence Williams. That way if we made this trade and Baron didn't come back as... well, Baron, then he could be our future big guard to play along with Monta and defend the other teams' SG's. Just a thought.

Starters:

PG: Baron Davis
SG: Monta Ellis
SF: Stephen Jackson
PF: Ronny Turiaf
C: Andris Biedrins

Bench:

PG: C.J. Watson
SG: Kelenna Azubuike
SF: Anthony Morrow
PF: Anthony Randolph
C: DeAndre Jordan

Reserves: Jamal Crawford (Yes, I know he's no one's reserve but until we figure out his future with the organization, I'm putting him here), Jermareo Davidson, Rob Kurz, +2 Draft Picks

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Not happening

First off, if we even wanted BD back it’s rumored we could basically have him for Maggs. If we didn’t want to sign BD to a 4 year/56 million dollar deal (including the year he opted out of) why would we trade for him when he has a more expensive and longer deal?

Second, we’d basically be trading Marco and BW for Jordan. I’m not sure why anyone would want to do that, I don’t think Nellie would have any use for him and I don’t think his value would be higher than Marco and BW.

by JRich4MVP on Jun 4, 2009 7:29 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

If I remember correctly...

BD did sign a 5 year $65 million deal to go to the Clipps right? So technically, looking at the salaries, he has 4 years $42 million left on his deal. So we’d be technically getting him at a discount, not a more expensive and longer deal.

by phiLthyphiL on Jun 4, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

you subtracted wrong. 5 yr 65 mill turns into 4 yrs 52 mill. not 42 mill.

you forgot that it works the same for the other deal. so that 4 for 56 is now 3 for 39.

3 for 39 vs 4 for 52.

either way, the W’s picked youth movement as soon as we traded Richardson (and therefore picked Monta). right or wrong, they should just stick w/ that direction and not make any more decisions that go against that philosophy (signing Maggette, extending Jack, trading Harrington for a guy w/ a longer contract).

by the evil monkey on Jun 4, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

yes

I like this trade and the only way I’d want BD back is with Jordan. Although does jordan still have any value?

by Balance on Jun 4, 2009 9:39 AM PDT reply actions  

GIVE IT UP

BD AIN’T COMING BACK! BUILD A BRIDGE AND GET OVER IT!!!

WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...

by JustSomeName on Jun 4, 2009 9:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Agreed

The Bay is the place to be!!

by Mashed Potatoes on Jun 6, 2009 7:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

We need to leave baron alone.

As much as I liked baron during we believe, I dont think he would be good for us in the long run. He may be decent for another year or 2 but thats about it. Baron is lazy on defense and performs most of the time when its primetime (national broadcast). He would be the answer to some of our problems but only in the short term. We need to move on! if would could get him for cheaper, then maybe, but I dont see that happening.

by Butt Secks on Jun 4, 2009 10:27 AM PDT reply actions  

We need to dump Crawford

not Maggette. Baron making $15 for the next 4 years – I’ll pass.

by Neon on Jun 4, 2009 12:28 PM PDT reply actions  

wee need to dump both

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 4, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

but if you had to pick 1…

by Neon on Jun 4, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

In another year Crawford will actually be a fairly valuable trade chip as an expiring contract.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 4, 2009 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Jack, but Crawford may actually be the 3rd contract I’d most like to be ride of.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 4, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah. if anything we should be trying to move Jack & Maggette’s contracts to near-contenders like Denver & Cleveland (though the rumor is the Cavs want to clear space for ‘10 to add another superstar next to Lebron – if they resign Varejao, it should pretty much take that off the table) or team’s who are desperate to build a winning team and keep their star players like Toronto. It’s not happening and we’re idiots anyway b/c with a healthy roster we are playoff bound!

by the evil monkey on Jun 4, 2009 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

randolph should start at PF...

turiaf off the bench

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawk on Jun 4, 2009 3:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Not just yet...

Randolph is growing in leaps and bounds but Turiaf (at least defensively) is pretty much already there, so I think it would be more for Beans’ sake to have Turiaf starting than anything else. Randolph would obviously start some, though. Like when the Lake Show comes to town.

by GSBoi86 on Jun 4, 2009 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

HERE's another one

I read that Boston is willing to trade Ray Allen along with Rondo. RONDO! So why don’t we try to put a package together for those guys

by bushido on Jun 5, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions  

yea I saw that, but

1) I have a hard time believing they would trade their best young player
2) They would certainly require Monta in return… my guess would be that they’d at least be looking for something like Monta/Belinelli/Jackson/Turiaf in exchange for Rondo/Allen, and I’m sure they are thinking about something more like Amare or Bosh if they really are serious about s blockbuster deal

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 5, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is what we should do

1 Dump Corey Maggette or trade him with Biedrins for a good big man maybe Tyson Chandler (throw in Morris peterson or Rasual Butler and i would love that deal

2 Trade #7 pick, Marco , Brandan Wright to Detroit for Tayshaun and #15 pick

3 If available at pick 15 draft Brandon Jennings ( I heard that his stock has dropped) if not available draft either Terrence Williams Ty Lawson or trade pick for more players

4 Trade or release Jamal Crawford

If we do all these things we should be good

starting lineup:

PG Monta
SG Stack Jack
SF Tayshaun
PF AR4
C Tyson Chandler

Bench: Ronny Turiaf C.J. Watson Kelena azubuike Rasual Butler Terrence Williams Anthony Morrow Rob “MVP for 2010” Kurz and Jamareo Davidson

The Bay is the place to be!!

by Mashed Potatoes on Jun 6, 2009 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

is chandler that much better than biedrins

he’s older, slightly injury prone, a worse rebounder but better defender. Offensively hes actually more limitd than AB

by tafkasam on Jun 6, 2009 11:58 AM PDT reply actions  

NO

Chandler is no better than Biedrins. They have the same strengths (rebounding, dunking, moving well for a big dude) and limitations (no offensive game whatsoever, average man to man defender at best), plus Chandler is older and hurt enough to not be accepted by a team that traded for him last year.

No thank you.

by Neon on Jun 6, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Warriors2_medium_small
Tom Abdenour... Where is he now?

Recent FanPosts

Ringnovember1981_small
Should Andris Biedrins be sent to the D-League?
Angel_beats__logo_small
An Alternative Explanation to why the Warriors let Lin, Williams and Bell go
Small
Now's the time to trade Curry to Charlotte
Small
Now is the time to make a trade.
Small
What was Nate Robinson's pre-dubs rep?
Kanji_love_small
Let's Party: GSoM Superbowl XLVI Open Thread
Small
2012 Draft: To Pick or Not to Pick, That is the Question
Small
To Tank, or Not To Tank
Small
stats question

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot