Happy 20th Birthday Anthony Randolph (a Hagiography)
So, like ... have you guys heard about this Anthony Randolph kid? ;-)
In honor of his 20th birthday (yup, a teenager no longer -- in another year he can legally drink) I thought it might be appropriate to consolidate all our current hopes, predictions, speculation, dreams, praise, poetic descriptions etc. for this kid into one diary. I suppose a sober, clear-headed critique or two would be welcome too, if you're a turd-in-the-punchbowl type of guy or gal.
To get things started, here are a couple of recent blurbs from ESPN's TrueHoop.
1. (through two games)
Anthony Randolph should have a Summer League exemption. It's really not even fair to the rest of the competition: 24 points on 10-of-13 from the field, 11 boards, five blocks. We saw him finish with his right, run the break in transition coast to coast, post, shoot from the perimeter. It was the full Randolph canvas on Saturday, and he's far and away the best talent here over the first two days.
2. (in the wake of his Vegas-record 42 points -- on a superefficient 22 field goal attempts, with zero turnovers -- three majestic swats, four steals...)
Randolph's dominance this week can't be overstated. The scoring exploits are impressive, but Randolph has been at it defensively (12 blocks and nine steals in four games), on the glass (8.5 rebounds per game), and passing out of double teams with poise and precision (zero turnovers today). Randolph isn't only the primary scorer on the floor, but the most creative facilitator.
Also, while it was hard to tell from my fuzzy four-inch square internet feed of the games how much muscle he had put on in the last few months, it's pretty clear in the NBA.com Summer League front-page image. Also pretty cool that his sad, regal visage is currently the splash page of both nba.com and the espn.com basketball page.
Once again: Twenty. Years. Old.
Plus ... #14 pick in the draft??? Incredible to think that after all my years wishing and hoping the Warriors would some year suck enough to get a high enough pick to land a franchise player, they may have finally landed one the year they went 48-34 -- their best record since the Webber debacle. Maybe there is something to this whole karma notion.
Anyway, fire away with your Randolph thoughts, observations, and shameless paeans (I was going to entitle this "Anthony Randolph: a Sploogefest," but wasn't sure it was suitable for a "family show").
p.s. One thing that I hope this diary won't descend into is another bad-nickname-fest, though I will admit that yesterday as I was pondering the wonder of Randolph and listening to the awesome early 70s Oakland funk/soul band Tower of Power, it occurred to me that we could do worse for an AR handle than "Tower of Power"...
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
6 recs |
122 comments
Comments
Hey, where’s the vote for “Tower of Power”?
There's a party in my mind.
And I wish that I was there.
by qin on Jul 15, 2009 8:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha
I actually meant the poll to pose the question “which historical figure do you prefer?” But I suppose if people interpret it as another nickname poll, that’s OK, too. Really, however you want to interpret it…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
best poll
ever. “select one” if i had to choose my savior… i mean can sweet jesus dunk with his left and right?
"We're Menudo," -BB
by eshock on Jul 15, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
better yet
there can only be ONE
"We're Menudo," -BB
by eshock on Jul 16, 2009 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you had me at hagiography
(Has anyone ever read Fifth Business by Robertson Davies? Maybe my favorite book, and very much about hagiography)
by jakarta on Jul 15, 2009 8:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Man i
hope Randolph becomes a hall of fame player and stays in Golden State for the rest of his career. Everyone is talking about AR so hopefully he can become a household name in the NBA. This guys potential is through the roof and he is hungry to become a great player like Lebron and Kobe. He just now is 20 and is all ready on his way to becoming a great player with the summer not even over yet. AR has a good opportunity to make a name for himself and hopefully becomes a multiple time All Star. Is Randolph 6’11 or 7’0 feet though cause i’m hearing he is now 7’ 0
by GSW9 on Jul 15, 2009 9:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Is there really any way to know once they make the bigs? It all seems very unscientific. When I watch Boston play Dallas, I’m struck by the fact that Garnett, who’s listed at 6’11", is clearly an inch or two taller than Nowitzki, who’s listed 7’0". At their level, I think some of it is how they want to be listed. Garnett apparently always had an issue with being considered a seven-footer; other guys probably like the distinction. Which is to say, if and when AR hits it big, I think he may have final say in whether he’s 6’10", 6’11", or 6’12", or 7’0".
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it comes down to strategy also...
Some guys like being listed smaller so that the opposing team can match up a smaller player against them that they can take advantage of. Or vice-a-versa, a player might want to get listed larger to get a bigger player that he can be quicker than and get around more easily.
I remember my foot ball days….I was listed @ 205, but was actually around 225…I feel like Al Bundy @ times reliving those days..LOL.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect that the rest of the league isn’t fooled by what a player is listed at in the slightest. It takes a moment of walking out on the court and seeing that a guy is or isn’t as tall as another player. If it works at all, it only works once, and then everyone in the league can see that their 6-10 guy is actually 3 inches shorter than the “6-11” guy wearing the other uniform.
by jae on Jul 15, 2009 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very true, not that it's fooling the league in anyway..
But as much as we can guesstimate what the height of a player is on the court, it’s hard to truly determine the height up a player unless they’re measured out, or compared out right in full upright posture to an opponent.
Those couple of inches of gray area always keep people guessing. How much of an advantage it is? Who knows.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
or compared out right in full upright posture to an opponent.
What if the opponent is exaggerating about his height as well?
WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...
by JustSomeName on Jul 15, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dwight howard also didnt want to be listed at 7-0 when he entered draft
didn’t want to be considered less ‘athletic’ cause he’s 7-0. Dont think anyone considers him less athletic now…
by tafkasam on Jul 15, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dwight Howard just isn’t 7’ is he? He looks quite a bit shorter than most of the taller centers.
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he’s more like 6’10", but he may be close to 7’ from shoulder to shoulder…
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
basically
once you hit high school and start having stats like height and weight on rosters it becomes one big lie. For height you are measures with your shoes on, and then on top of that some players or coaches will want to add another inch or two. When it comes to weight there is always an extra few pounds added. It’s all for intimidation when looking at the other teams roster. For me, i am a legit 6’4 176 pounds last year in high school but i was listed as 6’5 1/2 and 185. I also played against several players who claimed to be 6’6 on the roster yet i was taller than them. Other players like KG think the opposite(which i agree with). Instead of adding 2 inches and 10 pounds and then your opponents seeing you and saying “wow, there actually not that big”, subtract a few inches and pounds and then when your opponents see you there shocked how big you are. Its all really stupid but its just the way it is. And by the way, even though i heard randolph grew a little, at the draft combine w/o shoes he was exactly 6’9.
by bizz 192 on Jul 15, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Back in high school I was listed in between 5’9 and 6’1 depending on which tournament or publication you looked at or whatever. The only really accurate measure you’ll ever get are combine numbers.
By the way, official heights are supposed to be height in shoes, not w/o shoes.
by Missing Barry on Jul 15, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only really accurate measure you’ll ever get are combine numbers.
Even those have a bit of play in them, probably according to how careful the measurer is. I noticed that Wayne Ellington and Ty Lawson went to combines both of the last two years. Both were taller this year. Could be true. People do grow in their early 20s in some cases. But both had shorter wingspans this year. Are we really to believe that their arms got shorter? Or is there some wiggle-room even in the combine numbers.
Of course more important than how tall or how heavy someone is is how the guy actually plays the game. Listing someone taller or shorter or heavier or lighter doesn’t change that one bit.
by jae on Jul 15, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My assumption is year to year things might change a little bit in terms of measurements and what not, and I’d expect slight yearly biases, but I would think you could hold things pretty standard for players across a given year.
by Missing Barry on Jul 15, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
both had shorter wingspans this year. Are we really to believe that their arms got shorter?
Maybe they bulked up and lost some stretchibility?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 15, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Randolph is going to make Kevin Garnett look like Elvin Hayes.
Thing C
by markdash on Jul 15, 2009 9:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Randolph is going to make Kevin Garnett look like Elvin Hayes?
I’d be more impressed if he could make KG look like Elvis Presley.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 15, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m beginning to get so sick of the Randolph love fest around here I’m beginning to resent him…Joking! Kind of…
I have high hopes for Randolph as a Warriors fan, but my expectations are quite a bit lower. It seems everyone else has raised their expectations to the levels their hopes are at. That front page picture of Randolph hardly gives us a good shot of how much bigger he is. He also tied the summer league record for points held by such superstars as Marcus Banks and Von Wafer. It’s summer league, the competition sucks, and I can’t get worked up over anything that happens there.
Hopefully everything said about Randolph is true, but I’ll wait until I see him against actual NBA players to make any judgements. We’ll see…
*On a side note, while watching highlights for that dunk people were raving about I saw a highlight of Randolph taking a jumpshot – he has a pretty low release point, I’m not a fan.
by Missing Barry on Jul 15, 2009 9:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure you mentioned you don't live in the Bay, did you get to watch the games toward the end of last year?
(*Not trying to talk isshhh lol)
by 123707THIZZ on Jul 15, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve got slingbox so sometimes I watched games. I’ll say I didn’t watch too many towards the end of the season since I was so tired of watching that dreadful team.
by Missing Barry on Jul 15, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow man… The more comments I read from you the more its becoming clear that you don’t recognize whats going on with Randolph simply because you aren’t even watching the games.
by randolphforpresident on Jul 15, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or it’s because I have a little perspective on guys who have looked good in small time periods, or guys who have been overhyped by the media/fans or whoever else and aren’t as good as advertised. Randolph has a lot of potential, and it’s certainly better to be hearing good things than bad things, but as of right now he has yet to prove a whole lot at the NBA level.
You’re right about my lack of viewing Randolph, and in my comments I try not to address things I haven’t seen. At no point have I said his jumpshot is bad – more like I’ll believe it’s a weapon when I see him using it against NBA competition. I’ll believe he’s as big and jacked (relatively speaking, of course) as everyone is all of a sudden claiming when I see him next to NBA players who’s size I’ve seen enough to have a good feel for how big they really are. I’ll believe in his work ethic when I actually see the improvement for myself on the court, and no, playing against summer league players doesn’t prove anything.
I also wasn’t trying to rag on him for his low release point. I’m just saying it’s not optimal. With his quickness and height/length, I’m sure it’ll do fine, but it’s not exactly KG status, you know? Or Rasheed Wallace. They’ve got that size/length, AND the high release to where they can get it off any time they want (doesn’t mean at a high %).
There are a lot of reasons to be excited about Randolph. There are lots of other guys people are excited about, too. Always have been, always will be. Most of them never even get close to living up to their potential. I’m just trying to put that perspective on things before we got annoiting Randolph as the second coming of Jesus.
by Missing Barry on Jul 15, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
The most impressive things thus far about AR....
IMO, it wasn’t the end of last season as he came on strong, not the fact that he scowled at Yao after going up and over him, TWICE, not even the impressive birthday eve dropping of 42 points.
The thing that impresses me the most is the fact that he still feels he should have had a better game. The fact that he feels that the needs to be more “verstile” to help his squad win. His gripe that he only pulled 3 boards is a great measure as to how good this kid wants to be. He’s not content w/ setting the Summer League record, he wanted to do more to help his team.
After hyping this kid from draft day, my boys are finally saying that I may be right about him. He is now officially my favorite Warrior. Can’t wait to see what he can do during the season.
I’m thinking some where along the lines of 15pts, 8 Rebs, 2 Asts, and 1.5 Blks a game and I’ll be more than content. Not to mention .5 Posterizings a game.
What do you guys think is an acceptable line for his progression?
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 9:49 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I think that stat line sounds about right…. maybe 13/14 points, but he could possibly be in the 9/10 rebound area. I’m wondering what option he will be offensively this year. I think Monta will be one with Curry possibly being the 2nd. Which leaves jack and randolph and I hope Randolph becomes 3rd option so Jack doesn’t do to much creating and becomes our spot up shooter/defender/leader.
by FeartheBeard4 on Jul 15, 2009 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure Curry is ready to be the 2nd Option...
Yet. He’s forcing his shots up in the Summer League, he % reflects that. But i think we all know the kid is a great shooter, and he’ll come around. I think Nellie will keep him on the pine for the beginning, letting him test the waters a bit in garbage time. Kind of what he did w/ AR last year.
As much as I’m not in favor of some of the things Nellie does, he’s handled AR perfectly. I hope he does the same w/ Steph.
I see Monta as the 1st, Jax as the 2nd option, I think Mags(even off the bench) and Randolph will pretty much be the 3rd options. Nellie has a lot of confidence in Jax, and he’s the leader of the team.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re crazy if you think Curry is the second option instead of Jackson.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 15, 2009 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m thinking some where along the lines of 15pts, 8 Rebs, 2 Asts, and 1.5 Blks a game and I’ll be more than content.
Without a ‘mpg’, the raw numbers there don’t mean much. If he’s playing 38 minutes a game and only getting 8 rebounds, he’s taken a big step backwards. How many shots to make those 15pts is as important as the total itself.
by jae on Jul 15, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
I was simply going w/ the assumption that hell be seeing starter like minutes.
I don’t necessarily feel that 8 Rebs a game would be a step back from his game last year, even @ a 38 Min per. His number would be called a little more often and plays would be run for him, putting him more out of position to get the random boards that he would normally get playing off the ball. But I truthfully I do hope to see him w/ a higher rebounding rate than that, as it seems to be a forte. But I’d think that was at least adequate for a 2nd year player w/ his potential.
As for the shot totals, in Nellie’s inflated system, it’s hard to gauge what sort of shot output he’ll be getting. Especially since we haven’t seen the what the options look like when Monta and Jax would be on the floor. I hope he’ll get a good 10-12 looks a game, perhaps a little more. Depending on if he’s on or off. I think shooting near 45 % w/ a few from the stripe would be good enough.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh...and I don't think he'll be seeing the 38 mpg
They front office still looking for front court help. I’m think it’ll be closer to 25-30 Mpg. Especially to start the season with a chance to see a few more if he plays well.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Wright is healthy, he’ll only see about 25-30 mpg with Wright seeing 10-15 mpg. Remember who our coach is? He’ll probably have Maggette and/or Azubuike play some PF minutes as well…
WARRIORS BASKETBALL!!! Patiently waiting for a title...I may be waiting for a long time...
by JustSomeName on Jul 15, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you guys think is an acceptable line for his progression?
That he plays in a manner that he can maintain all season without injury. Anyone can go out and play over their head for a few minutes or even a few games but the real stars can perform at a high level all season long without pressing.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 15, 2009 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In 4 days it's my bday
Stop.......... Hammertime!!!!!
by MR. Bigshot 123 on Jul 15, 2009 10:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What are the chances?!?!
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
roughly
8/365 (that it would be within 4 days of AR’s) Crazy!!!!!!!
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looked at another way…
• The number of people required so that there’s a greater than 50/50 chance that two of them will have birthdays within four days of each other? 9.
• Number required so that there’s a better than 50/50 chance two of them will have the exact same birthday? 23.
• Chances that in a group of 57 random people, two will have the exact same birthday? Better than 99%.
• Chances that in a group of 400 random people one will have the exact same birthday as Anthony Randolph? Better than 60%.
There are a whole lot of people on GSoM. Mark Dash or another “boy genius” can use the wikipedia formulas to figure out the exact chance that someone on this site (other than Bigshot) has a birthday within four days of Anthony Randolph, but I suspect it’s damn near 100%.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, I think my stats teacher rattled off those exact facts the first day of class (minus the AR part) ……..right before I fell asleep. Good to know that the constantly and dramatically increasing cost of tuition doesn’t mean I’m being cheated out of lesson plans cut and pasted straight from wiki.
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya, but ya know it’s all 50-50 on any given day ;-P
by hardcore on Jul 15, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
nicely done
that joke was just sitting there waiting to be made…..
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m honored that you called me a boy genius, but frankly I find the use of quotation marks insulting.
And in light of the true ages of monta.da.boss and other users, I’m not sure I qualify for boy status anymore. I’m more than twice 14…
Thing C
by markdash on Jul 15, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
will see your twice and raise you another 14 … and change!
by hardcore on Jul 15, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And people make fun of ME for being old!
by IQofaWarrior on Jul 15, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
An extremely sore back after running only a couple miles this morning, concern over what appears to be a burgeoning beer belly and the need for an afternoon nap today were making me feel very old today…… until all you fogies started talking b-days and ages….. proceed.
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
switch to scotch, it’ll take care of the beer belly
you’re welcome padwan …
by hardcore on Jul 15, 2009 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
which should then clear up the back and need for a nap I guess…… scotch is the answer to everything
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oops
I meant to just put the quotes around “genius”… ;-)
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it keeps coming
“Randolph just had the dunk of summer leagues, past-present-and future. Think Superman’s throwdown, plus the And1 factor. Stunning and sweet!”
The dude is going to be awesome.
by warriorsvictim on Jul 15, 2009 10:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The dude is awesome.
Fixed for accuracy. :)
Thing C
by markdash on Jul 15, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Summer League exemption?
Haha, I was thinking the same thing. Scoring 42 points in summer league is like a bully playin in the special olympics . Does it make the bully look cool or make him look needy? Could this be the high point of rudolf’s career?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 15, 2009 11:23 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you trying to say that Marcus Banks and Von Wafer scoring 42 points didn’t solidify their status as NBA superstars?
by Missing Barry on Jul 15, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but Marco Belinelli dropped only 36 and anyone who watches him play now knows that he’s our best PG despite all statistical evidence to the contrary.
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree
Marco does a great job running the point, and he’d have great stats if he played a good amount of minutes. He’s way better than Curry at this point and should be ahead of him in the rotation
by WeStillBelieve on Jul 17, 2009 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but Marco Belinelli dropped only 36
So apparently Morrow is 1.30 times better than Marco? This stats stuff makes it easy!
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 18, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not Christian so it’s Randolph all day. Sorry Jesus.
by belilaugh on Jul 15, 2009 11:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
hahaha!!!
Stop.......... Hammertime!!!!!
by MR. Bigshot 123 on Jul 15, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's kinda stretchin it...
Don’t you think? Cuz as much as he may have dominated, he’s there w/ a bunch of second and even 3/4 year players. And he’s even younger than a lot of the rookies! haha
Skill wise, I don’t mind he dominated, but I do agree that it’s only Summer League….see Marco Belinelli.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 11:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Belinelli, Banks, Von Wafer
They had their good games by getting hot. Sinking shot after shot. AR was out there hustling; hitting jumpers, driving, getting to the line. Yes against some not too great D, but it’s different than just heating up as a shooter
by 123707THIZZ on Jul 15, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look what you did...
Randolph is more popular than Jesus. Are you ready for the the backlash Sleepy?

Thing 2
by olympicmike on Jul 15, 2009 11:53 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Uh-oh
When they come picketing on my front lawn, I could always tell them I meant Jesus Shuttlesworth…

There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
for a second
i thought that ray allen in a throwback warriors outfit.
2009-2010 chef's menu:
Buike Burgers
Stack Jacks (singles, doubles, triples)
Beans
Magnuggets
Randolph's Red light specials
Stephen's Curry
Ronny-O's
Bwright's Blocks of Brownies
CJ (calmansi juice, free refills courtsey of AMMO)
Monta's Mississippi Milkshake
by seven72deuce on Jul 15, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Randolph’s disappointment after the 95-83 victory over Chicago was measured. He did, after all, score 42 points the day before his 21st birthday, matching a mark only two others have accomplished in the Summer League’s six-year run in Las Vegas. bq.
Silly nba.com getting it wrong
by TheJza on Jul 15, 2009 12:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Dude...
I’m really starting not to like TK…lol…
He has that elite-level arrogance, which is absolutely a good thing, and looks like is carrying through against SL Scrubs./blockquote>
Um…really..Arrogance? He really needs to differentiate between “Arrogance” and determination or will. I mean, arrogance would be him saying " I know I’m the best ", while the kid keeps saying he wants to BE the best and improve. He shows good determination and conviction by working out in the summer before the rest of his squad, that’s just his desire.
by esco41510 on Jul 15, 2009 1:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Randolph
Where were most of you last year when AR was in Don’s dog house, and I said he was the second coming !! ?
Sleepy was ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ back then =)
by ForestGrump on Jul 15, 2009 3:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Happy BDay, AR! I hope this works...
Remember that monster block of AR on Thomas from last season? These 2 gifs are different angles of that block, synced up, same number of frames. So if your browser starts these 2 animations at the same time, this should produce a neat little “split screen” effect of that block. If not, well then, EXPERIMENT FAIL!

by IQofaWarrior on Jul 15, 2009 3:21 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Awesome, IQ.
And lest we forget the awesome continuation of that scene, wherein Thomas continues to writhe on the ground crying like a little girl, while Randolph, stone-faced, lands on his feet, saves to Biedrins, gathers himself, gets it back and dribbles coast to coast for a lay in at the other end.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol, i would have added that
but that would have pushed the gif way past 1MB. I like to keep these small in size so pages don’t stall while downloading these gifs.
by IQofaWarrior on Jul 15, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So if nobody complained about this being out of sync
I can assume this worked for everyone…? That is, both gifs are in sync?
by IQofaWarrior on Jul 16, 2009 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way, I don’t know what the deal is, but nobody else thought Randolph’s putback dunk over Odom where he just jumps right over him was cool enough to put on Youtube or anything. Does anyone else remember that play and think it was as nasty as I do?
by Missing Barry on Jul 16, 2009 7:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thomas:
Do you guys remember the the slams Thomas made after that block?
by ForestGrump on Jul 15, 2009 4:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
shh rotfl
We must be still A Legend is being born !! =)
by ForestGrump on Jul 15, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sleepy, you’ve apparently reached (probably a little while ago) celebrity/rock star status on GSoM. Because, and no offense to you because I am not saying you wrote a bad diary (average IMO) or expected the diary to get six recs, but I am a little confused as to how this diary got six recommendations. It seems to be pretty average (though the formatting is excellent, props for that).
Anyway, what I am hoping is that after his latest high scoring, low rebounding effort, Randolph will be motivated to at least attempt to keep his offensive game up (like a 15+ point effort in a reasonable amount of shots) while getting his rebound on massively (20+ at least). I want to see him take those measly 3 rebounds personally and respond by grabbing every ball up for grabs.
by belilaugh on Jul 15, 2009 8:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
its a simple formula
an idea expressed clearly+a subject that most Warriors fans enjoy talking about+expressed in a pretty unique way+solid formatting+good grammar and spelling+citing reliable sources+a small joke or two=rec’d fanpost….. I actually didn’t rec this one, but I don’t think you can simply chalk it’s popularity up to Sleepy’s “rock star status.”
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 15, 2009 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll add that a clear title where people get a very good idea of what the thread will start out being about is good too. [Contrast with the other Randolph thread started today (“Why the Hail Not?”) and only one makes me aware of what it’s about before opening it up. I assumed the latter would be another inane trade proposal with a suggestion to make it (e.g. “why the hail not trade Monta for Jordan Farmar and change to make the deal work?”). It wasn’t such a thread, but it should have been titled better.]
by jae on Jul 15, 2009 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
clear title?
Hagiography?!
I’d venture if we’d’ve run a poll on how many GSoM knew that word before it’d’ve been less than 2%
by hardcore on Jul 15, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sleepy, you’ve apparently reached (probably a little while ago) celebrity/rock star status on GSoM.
Sleepy is the original rockstar of GSoM. :-P
It seems to be pretty average (though the formatting is excellent, props for that).
Well, it might be average for a regular poster (though, I personally enjoyed it quite a bit more than that) but it’s certainly much better than most of the fanposts that pop up here.
Good point about the formating though. I’ve actually recommended posts purely for good formating. I remember one time in particular giving one of hardcore’s posts a rec before I read it just because it was so aesthetically pleasing. I think the content turned out to be pretty good too.
Beyond that I’ll just give a big +1 to sam and Jae as they already made some great points.
Thing 2
by olympicmike on Jul 15, 2009 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Belilaugh:
I was thinking the same thing (about the lameness of the diary, not the rock star stuff); and I actually felt a pretty strong twinge of embarrassment when it got recced up. The only nugget of an interesting point was the irony (from the POV of a frequent tanking advocate) of the fact we may have landed our first franchise guy since Webber the same year we had our best record since Webber. But that point kinda got buried amid a fair amount of pointless fluff. Hold me to a higher standard next time, groupies!!! ;-)
On topic: I was also thinking the same thing about the rebounds. I’m not sure I saw Randolph (or really any other Warrior) box out and grab a clean defensive rebound the entire game against the Bulls. It was painful. 20+ rebounds of atonement to close out the LVSL sounds appropriate. Now let’s see if he can “pull a Wilt” and reach a statistical threshold simply because he decides he wants to do it. Against that level of competition, I wouldn’t bet against him.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 15, 2009 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your poll lol (smh)
Judge: "In the case of 3 month old Tracie Taylor, we find that Dirk Nowitzki .... IS the father!"
Dirk [in Hassellhoff accent]: "That baby don't look like me!"
by AR4 on Jul 15, 2009 8:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Does the Tower of Power moniker come with a supply of former ToP bassist Victor Conte’s amazing workout supplements? Might be exactly what anyone who wants him and Brandan to “bulk up” really need.
by jae on Jul 15, 2009 8:49 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Off topic...
I’m having an issue when I try to skip from new comment to new comment using the “z” function. It just sends me to the top of the page every time now. Anybody else having the same issue?
Thing 2
by olympicmike on Jul 15, 2009 9:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
nope, works fine for me
firefox 1.5.0.12, firefox 3.0.11
by IQofaWarrior on Jul 15, 2009 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks...
It’s been hit or miss. I’m actually on safari 4.0.2 right now, but I thought it was doing this when I was at work too (Firefox, not sure what version…). I just checked with firefox 3.0.11 and it was working fine. I think I just updated Safari, so there could be some issue there. I’ll probably just switch browsers.
Anybody else feel free to post if you are having a similar issue.
Thing 2
by olympicmike on Jul 15, 2009 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s buggy. I’ve had the same thing from time to time with both the c and z key features. It’s never consistently though and seems to be a problem in Firefox, Opera and (in the rare instances where I find myself on windows) Chrome. It does not appear to be a browse model issue. I suspect it’s part of the scripts running that put up the ad banners stealing your cursor. Or at least that’s my working hypothesis.
by jae on Jul 15, 2009 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m having an issue when I try to skip from new comment to new comment using the "z" function
Does it work with the “c” key?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 15, 2009 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the page loads buggy...
then neither of them work properly. They just bounce me up to the top of the page. Same thing happens when I post something.
It’s fine right now, but it seems to be happening more in the last few days.
Thing 2
by olympicmike on Jul 15, 2009 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Already too good for summer league
AR is a man
by runningdonut on Jul 16, 2009 2:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
More random Randolph thoughts...
Not trying to force a nickname on him, but my earlier description of him as “stone-faced” made me think of the original “Great Stone Face,” one of my all-time favorite screen performers, Buster Keaton (yes, RDizzle, before my time…) The way he throws himself around and “puppyf*cks” the opponent (thanks, Skeptic) is also vaguely reminiscent of Keaton.

Not saying I’d go so far as to make an explicit Keaton connection, but I just kinda like the connotations of “Stoneface.” Recapping a few of Randolph’s metaphorical associations that have resonated for me (again, I’m NOT proposing nicknames)…
• Stoneface
• Tower of Power (or ToP)
• Fire in the Sky (submitted by another GSoMer, because of resemblance to the aliens in the movie; also a nice description of the player)
• Candyman (yeah, totally ruined by Olowokandi, but woulda been perfect — I can totally see him with a hook-hand and a mouthful o’ bees…)
• Comanche (something his warrior / “noble savage” bearing suggest a Native American connection, a la Robert “the Chief” Parish…)
In the end, I’m quite sure that the awful “AR4” will start to gain a foothold, unpoetic and unoriginal as it is, simply because it’s easy to type.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 16, 2009 9:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Of all the players who could be bestowed with the nickname “Stoneface,” is it really appropriate that it’s the player who basically cried on the sideline last year after being pulled out of the game?
Thing C
by markdash on Jul 16, 2009 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the end, I’m quite sure that the awful "AR4" will start to gain a foothold
I thought he was Rudolf , come to magically guide our sleigh outta loser hell?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 16, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
D'oh
How the heck I forget that one? I even made a funny pic in its honor…

There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 16, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

The resemblance is uncanny!
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 16, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
as a keaton fan
you probably know how he acquired his skills. to get laughs on the vaudeville circuit, his parents used to pick him up by the feet and use him like a broom to sweep up.
before technology transformed performing arts into mass entertainment, actors, dancers, jugglers usw. were considered the lower dregs of society, one step above begging and close to prostitution. (some of the higher regarded arts were those associated with royal patronage or the church which of course was also immensely wealthy) those of us who witnessed and remember the 50s and 60s know there was a rough parallel in what happened in professional sports once it tapped into television revenues. rick barry liked to tell the story how the woe-yrs gave him one road uniform and he had to hand wash it himself in the locker room.
randolph himself comes from a middle class background, i believe, parents in the military? let’s wait for him to succeed against true competition—i look forward to it and by no means am i predicting failure—before anointing him anything. ellis has been anointed many times over, but it’s hardly assured that he’ll be anything greater than a well paid, narrowly specialized, scoring guard.
by the.monk on Jul 16, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"With the #14 pick...."
For fun, here’s a list of the #14 guys taken since 1990, which should give a sense of what kind of player one can generally expect from that draft slot. (Was about to post this in the now-deleted “Best Player in 2008 draft” thread, but it fits here).
90 Travis Mays
91 Rich King (seriously, who the F is Rich King???)
92 Malik Sealy
93 Scott Haskin
94 Yinka Dare
95 Eric Williams
96 Peja Stojakovic
97 Maurice Taylor
98 Michael Dickerson
99 William Avery
00 Mateen Cleaves
01 Troy Murphy
02 Fred Jones
03 Luke Ridnour
04 Kris Humphries
05 Rashad McCants
06 Ronnie Brewer
07 Al Thornton
08 Anthony Randolph
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 16, 2009 10:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
… or Yinka Dare!
Can you say “NBA Body”?
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 16, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember when Dare had the record for most time played without getting an assist. His comment when asked about it was that eventually, it would happen but he wasn’t going to force it.
by jae on Jul 16, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SLEEPY F...WHY THE RANDOLPH VS JESUS POLL?!
Randolph is a basketball player, not a prophet of God! I think AR knows this, but unfortunately, it appears that you (Sleepy) do not. Throughout history anyone that got a God complex was destroyed! So, let’s pray AR never gets one.
The poll is very disrespectful. You may be an atheist, but that does not give you the right to disrespect others. In the final analysis, we are all judged by the decisions we make.
So please, just show a little respect!
by deja8 on Jul 16, 2009 9:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
In the final analysis, we are all judged by the decisions we make.
What if you are wrong and Rudolf is the true prophet ?
Maybe write a bible about him ? it could be a best seller?? :>) then a tv show where I get lost souls to send me money to build my compound? then some hookers??
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 16, 2009 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll take that as a vote for Jesus? ;-)
I have tons of respect for for the teachings of Jesus. He seems to have been a very cool dude.
Poll was 100% in jest. Please, show a little humor.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jul 16, 2009 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
new poll
A. Anthony Randolph
B. Asian chicks
Thing A
by sam23 on Jul 16, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
or make it a 3 way?
jesus, Rudolf and asian chicks.
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 16, 2009 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
chicks is plural, it have to be at least a quad …
by hardcore on Jul 17, 2009 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
chicks is plural,
not when you objectify them
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 17, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He seems to have been a very cool dude
and probably pissed at the way people twist his words?
Now wheres the rubbers? Whose got the rubbers?
I noticed there's so many of them
and there's really not that many of us.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jul 16, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who’s being disrespected? SF is showing Jesus mad props by putting him in the same poll as Anthony Randolph, Hardwood Hero.
Thing C
by markdash on Jul 16, 2009 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
atheist people at gsom?
Cause Havoc. Bring Nash in and 120 point games will be very expected
by montadaboss on Jul 19, 2009 11:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
There’s a difference between not being Christian and being atheist, remember that.
by belilaugh on Jul 22, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















